Early effects of oral administration of lafutidine with mosapride compared with lafutidine alone on intragastric pH values

Background

The ideal medication for treatment of acid related diseases should have a rapid onset of action to promote hemostasis and resolution of symptoms. The aim of our study was to investigate the inhibitory effects on gastric acid secretion after a single oral administrations of lafutidine, is a newly synthesized H2-receptor antagonist, with mosapride 5 mg or lafutidine alone.

Methods

Ten Helicobacter pylori negative male subjects participated in this randomized, two-way crossover study. Intragastric pH was monitored continuously for 4 hours after a single oral administration of lafutidine 10 mg or lafutidine 10 mg with mosapride 5 mg (the lafutidine being administrated one hour after the mosapride). Each administration was separated by a 7-day washout period.

Results

The average pH during the 4-hour period after administration of lafutidine 10 mg with mosapride 5 mg was higher than after lafutidine 10 mg alone (median: 5.25 versus 4.58, respectively; p = 0.0318). During the 3–4 hour study period, lafutidine 10 mg with mosapride 5 mg provided a higher pH, compared to lafutidine 10 mg alone (median: 7.28 versus 6.42; p = 0.0208).

Conclusion

In H. pylori negative healthy male subjects, an oral dose of lafutidine 10 mg with mosapride 5 mg more rapidly increased intragastric pH than lafutidine 10 mg alone.     

An open-label, randomized, cross-over bioequivalence study of lafutidine 10 mg under fasting condition

AIM: To assess the relative bioavailability and pharmacokinetic properties of two formulations (test and reference) of Lafutidine 10 mg.METHODS: The study was performed as an open label, randomized, two-way, two-period, two-treatment, single dose cross-over bioequivalence study, under non-fed condition to compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of the lafutidine formulation manufactured by Emcure Pharmaceuticals Ltd., India using an indigenously developed active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and the commercially available Stogra^® formulation, of UCB Japan Co., Ltd., Japan. The two treatments were separated by a wash-out period of 5 d. After an overnight fasting period of 10 h, the subjects were administered either the test or the reference medication as per the randomization schedule. Blood samples were collected at intervals up to 24 h, as per the approved protocol. Concentrations of lafutidine in plasma were analyzed by a validated liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method, and a non-compartmental model was used for pharmacokinetic analysis. The pharmacokinetic parameters were subjected to a 4-way ANOVA accounting for sequence, subjects, period and treatment. Statistical significance was evaluated at 95% confidence level (P ≥ 0.05).RESULTS: The mean (± SD) values of the pharmacokinetic parameters (test vs reference) were C_max (265.15 ± 49.84 ng/mL vs 246.79 ± 29.30 ng/mL, P < 0.05), Area under the curve (AUC)_(0-t) (1033.13 ± 298.74 ng.h/mL vs 952.93 ± 244.07 ng.h/mL, P < 0.05), AUC_(0-∞) (1047.61 ± 301.22 ng.h/mL vs 964.21 ± 246.45 ng.h/mL, P < 0.05), and t_½(1.92 ± 0.94 h vs 2.05 ± 1.01 h, P < 0.05). The 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the test/reference ratio of mean C_max, AUC_(0-t), and AUC_(0-∞) were within the acceptable range of 80.00 to 125.00. The mean times (± SD) to attain maximal plasma concentration (t_max) of lafutidine were 0.95 ± 0.24 h vs 1.01 ± 0.29 h (P < 0.05) for the test and the reference formulations respectively. Both the formulations were well tolerated.CONCLUSION: In summary, this study has demonstrated the bioequivalence of the two formulations of lafutidine 10 mg. Hence it can be concluded that the two formulations can be used interchangeably in clinical settings.     

Randomized study of lafutidine vs lansoprazole in patients with mild gastroesophageal reflux disease

AIM: To compare the clinical efficacy of the second-generation H2RA lafutidine with that of lansoprazole in Japanese patients with mild gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).METHODS: Patients with symptoms of GERD and a diagnosis of grade A reflux esophagitis (according to the Los Angeles classification) were randomized to receive lafutidine (10 mg, twice daily) or lansoprazole (30 mg, once daily) for an initial 8 wk, followed by maintenance treatment comprising half-doses of the assigned drug for 24 wk. The primary endpoint was the frequency and severity of heartburn during initial and maintenance treatment. The secondary endpoints were the sum score of questions 2 and 3 in the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), and the satisfaction score.RESULTS: Between April 2012 and March 2013, a total of 53 patients were enrolled, of whom 24 and 29 received lafutidine and lansoprazole, respectively. After 8 wk, the frequency and severity of heartburn was significantly reduced in both groups. However, lafutidine was significantly inferior to lansoprazole with regard to the severity of heartburn during initial and maintenance treatment (P = 0.016). The sum score of questions 2 and 3 in the GSRS, and satisfaction scores were also significantly worse in the lafutidine group than the lansoprazole group (P = 0.0068 and P = 0.0048, respectively).CONCLUSION: The clinical efficacy of lafutidine was inferior to that of lansoprazole, even in Japanese patients with mild GERD.     

A double-blind, controlled study comparing lafutidine with placebo and famotidine in Japanese patients with mild reflux esophagitis

Purpose  

This randomized, double-blind, controlled study examined whether lafutidine is superior to placebo and non-inferior to famotidine in terms of healing rates as assessed by endoscopy in Japanese patients with mild reflux esophagitis. Safety and improvement in symptoms of heartburn were also assessed.     

拉呋替丁联合奥美拉唑治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎临床疗效观察

目的观察拉呋替丁联合奥美拉唑治疗慢性萎缩性胃炎的临床疗效。方法选取该院2014-03~2016-09收治的慢性萎缩性胃炎患者96例为研究对象,使用随机数字表法分为对照组和观察组各48例。对照组单用奥美拉唑,观察组接受拉呋替丁联合奥美拉唑治疗,两组均治疗2个月,比较两组治疗前后血清胃蛋白酶亚群测定值、治疗效果、并发症情况。结果两组治疗前胃蛋白酶原Ⅰ、胃蛋白酶原Ⅱ及胃蛋白酶原Ⅰ/胃蛋白酶原Ⅱ测定值比较,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。治疗后观察组上述指标均明显优于对照组(P0.05)。观察组痊愈20例,显效18例,有效9例,无效1例,对照组痊愈12例,显效16例,有效12例,无效8例,观察组治疗效果优于对照组(P0.05);两组不良反应发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论拉呋替丁联合奥美拉唑能够有效改善慢性萎缩性胃炎患者临床症状,优化治疗效果,安全性高。     

A prospective randomized trial of lafutidine vs rabeprazole on post-ESD gastric ulcers

AIM: To compare the effects of rabeprazole and lafutidine on post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) gastric ulcers.METHODS: Patients with gastric tumors indicated for ESD were prospectively studied. After ESD, all patients were treated with intravenous omeprazole for the first 3 d. Patients were then randomly assigned to oral lafutidine or rabeprazole. Ulcer size, ulcer size reduction rate, and ulcer stage were evaluated 4 wk later. Occurrence of complication was monitored throughout the 4-wk period.RESULTS: Sixty five patients were enrolled in the study, and 60 patients were subjected to the final analysis. In the lafutidine group (30 lesions in 29 patients), initial and 4-wk post-ESD ulcer sizes were 33.3 ± 9.2 and 10.5 ± 4.8 mm, respectively. In the rabeprazole group (34 lesions in 31 patients), the values were 34.7 ± 11.3 and 11.8 ± 6.7 mm, respectively. Ulcer size reduction rates in lafutidine and rabeprazole groups were 32.3% and 33.5%, respectively (P = 0.974). Ulcer stage 4 wk post-ESD did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.868). Two cases in the rabeprazole group and no cases in the lafutidine group developed ulcer bleeding during the oral dose period, although the difference of bleeding rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.157).CONCLUSION: Lafutidine and rabeprazole have equivalent therapeutic effects on post-ESD gastric ulcers.     

Effects of a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist, lafutidine, on the mucus barrier of human gastric mucosa

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lafutidine is a novel histamine H(2)-receptor antagonist used primarily as an antisecretory agent in Japan. Previous human studies have not assessed its gastroprotective effects. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effects of lafutidine on the human gastric mucus layer using both histological and biochemical methods. METHODS: Of the 14 patients scheduled for gastrectomy who consented to participate, seven were given 14 days of lafutidine 20 mg/day (lafutidine group) and the others received no medication (control group). The surface mucus gel layer in Carnoy-fixed tissue sections was examined immunohistochemically. Both the thickness of the mucus layer and its mucin content were measured in gastric corpus mucosa. RESULTS: There was no detectable difference between the groups in the grade of gastritis or the immunohistochemical staining characteristics. The laminated structure of the surface mucus gel layer was retained after administration of lafutidine and it was thicker than the layer in the control group. The surface layer in the lafutidine group had three-fold more mucin than that in the control group. There was no difference between the two groups in the mucin content of the deep mucosa. CONCLUSION: Lafutidine, given at clinical dosages, not only inhibits acid secretion but also strengthens the mucus barrier of the human gastric mucosa.     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori status on intragastric pH during administration of lafutidine or famotidine

BACKGROUND/AIMS: There has been no study attempting to compare the effects of lafutidine, a novel H2-receptor antagonist and other H2-receptor antagonists in the same subjects and relating them to H. pylori status. The first aim of this study was to investigate the effect of H. pylori status on intragastric pH in healthy volunteers receiving lafutidine or famotidine. The second aim was to compare the effects of the two antisecretory drugs. METHODOLOGY: The study was carried out in 11 healthy asymptomatic male volunteers. H. pylori infection was present in 5 subjects. Subjects were first examined by an ambulatory pH monitoring for 24 hours without medication. The second and third 24-hour pH monitoring study was performed on all subjects. Subjects took 10 mg lafutidine or 20mg famotidine at 9:00 and 21:00. RESULTS: During administration of lafutidine or famotidine, the percentage of period holding intragastric pH >4 was not significantly different between the H. pylori-negative and -positive subjects. Among the H. pylori negative subjects, the percentage of daytime period holding intragastric pH >4 was significantly greater with lafutidine than with famotidine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of lafutidine to increase intragastric pH was not affected by the H. pylori status. Among H. pylori-negative subjects, lafutidine was proven to be more effective than famotidine for acid control during the daytime in Japanese healthy volunteers.     

Stronger inhibition of gastric acid secretion by lafutidine, a novel H2 receptor antagonist, than by the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole

AIM： To compare the antisecretory activity and plasma drug concentrations of a single oral dose of 10 mg lafutidine, a novel H2 receptor antagonist, with those of the proton pump inhibitor lansoprazole （LPZ） 30 mg. METHODS： Ten volunteers without H pylori infection participated in this crossover study comparing lafutidine 10 mg with LPZ 30 mg. Intragastric pH was monitored for 6 h in all participants, and blood samples were collected from four randomly selected individuals after single-dose administration of each drug. RESULTS： The median intragastric pH was significantly higher in individuals who received lafutidine 10 mg than in those who received LPZ 30 mg 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h after administration. Maximal plasma drug concentration was reached more promptly with lafutidine 10 mg than with LPZ 30 mg. CONCLUSION： In H pylori-negative individuals, gastric acid secretion is more markedly inhibited by lafutidinethan by LPZ.     

Gastro-protective action of lafutidine mediated by capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons without interaction with TRPV1 and involvement of endogenous prostaglandins

AIM: Lafutidine, a histamine H2 receptor antagonist, exhibits gastro-protective action mediated by capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons (CSN). We compared the effect between lafutidine and capsaicin, with respect to the interaction with endogenous prostaglandins (PG), nitric oxide (NO) and the afferent neurons, including transient receptor potential vanilloid subtype 1 (TRPV1). METHODS: Male SD rats and C57BL/6 mice, both wild-type and prostacyclin IP receptor knockout animals, were used after 18 h of fasting. Gastric lesions were induced by the po administration of HCI/ethanol (60% in 150 mmol/L HCI) in a volume of 1 mL for rats or 0.3 mL for mice. RESULTS: Both lafutidine and capsaicin (1-10 mg/kg, po) afforded dose-dependent protection against HCI/ ethanol in rats and mice. The effects were attenuated by both the ablation of CSN and pretreatment with NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, yet only the effect of capsaicin was mitigated by prior administration of capsazepine, the TRPV1 antagonist, as well as indomethacin. Lafutidine protected the stomach against HCI/ethanol in IP receptor knockout mice, similar to wild-type animals, while capsaicin failed to afford protection in the animals lacking IP receptors. Neither of these agents affected the mucosal PGE2 or 6-keto PGF1αcontents in rat stomachs. Capsaicin evoked an increase in [Ca2 ]i in rat TRPV1-transfected HEK293 cells while lafutidine did not. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that although both lafutidine and capsaicin exhibit gastro-protective action mediated by CSN, the mode of their effects differs regarding the dependency on endogenous PGs/IP receptors and TRPV1. It is assumed that lafutidine interacts with CSN at yet unidentified sites other than TRPV1.     

Protective effect of lafutidine against indomethacin-induced intestinal ulceration in rats: relation to capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons

BACKGROUND/AIM: We examined the prophylactic effect of lafutidine, a novel histamine H(2)-receptor antagonist [(+/-)-2-(furfurylsulfinyl)-N-[4-[4-(piperidinomethyl)-2-pyr idyl]oxy- (Z)-2 butenyl]acetamide], on indomethacin-induced small intestinal ulcers in rats and investigated the relation of this action to capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons. METHODS AND RESULTS: Subcutaneously administered indomethacin (10 mg/kg) provoked ulceration in the small intestine, mainly the jejunum and ileum, accompanied by increases in myeloperoxidase (MPO) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) activities as well as the enterobacterial numbers invading the mucosa. Intestinal ulcerogenic response to indomethacin was prevented by 16,16-dimethyl prostaglandin E(2) (10 microg/kg, p.o.) and capsaicin (10 mg/kg, p.o. ) as well as ampicillin (800 mg/kg, p.o.), but not omeprazole (100 mg/kg, p.o.). Likewise, lafutidine (1-10 mg/kg, p.o.), but not cimetidine (100 mg/kg, p.o.), reduced the occurrence of intestinal ulcers in response to indomethacin in a dose-dependent manner, and a significant effect was observed at 3 mg/kg or greater. The protective action of lafutidine as well as capsaicin was almost totally abolished by chemical ablation of capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons. Both lafutidine and capsaicin significantly suppressed the increases in MPO and iNOS activities as well as enterobacterial numbers in the mucosa. These agents also significantly enhanced mucus secretion in the small intestine. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that lafutidine protects the small intestine against ulceration via stimulation of capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons. This action may be attributable to inhibition of enterobacterial invasion in the intestinal mucosa, probably by increasing the mucus secretion.     

Potent and long-lasting action of lafutidine on the human histamine H(2) receptor.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Based on animal models, lafutidine, a novel histamine H(2) receptor (H(2)R) antagonist, is reported to show potent and long-lasting antagonisms of histamine H(2)R-mediated effects. However, no reports have been published concerning its direct interaction with the human H(2)R. This study aims at characterizing its interaction with human H(2)R. METHODS: Chinese hamster ovary cell lines stably expressing human H(2)Rs were obtained. The dose-dependent effects of lafutidine and famotidine on [(3)H]tiotidine binding and histamine-stimulated cAMP production were analyzed. The effects of preincubation with 2.78 x 10(-7) M of lafutidine or famotidine for 30 min on histamine-dependent cAMP production and [(3)H]tiotidine binding were also examined after 0, 1, 2, 4, and 12 h. This concentration is below the C(max) of lafutidine (10 mg p.o.) and above the C(max) of famotidine (20 mg p.o.). RESULTS: Lafutidine inhibited [(3)H]tiotidine binding and histamine-stimulated cAMP production as or more potently than famotidine. At higher concentrations lafutidine was more potent than famotidine. In addition, preincubation with 2.78 x 10(-7) M lafutidine, but not with 10(-5) M famotidine, had marked inhibitory effects which persisted as long as after extensive washing. CONCLUSION: Lafutidine shows a potent and long-lasting antagonism on the human H(2)R.     

Morphologic characteristics of esophageal epithelium in a rat model of duodenoesophageal reflux and protective effect of lafutidine

Backgrounds

The objectives of this study were to delineate differences in the morphologic characteristics of reflux esophagitis between a rat gastroesophageal reflux (GER) model and a duodenoesophageal reflux (DER) model and to evaluate the effects of H2-receptor antagonists on morphologic characteristics of reflux esophagitis in DER model.

Methods

Wistar rats were divided into 3 groups: GER model group (Group G), DER model group (Group D), and control group (Group C). Rats in each group were sacrificed 1 or 12 weeks after surgery. Intraesophageal pH was measured, and the excised esophagus was examined macroscopically and histologically. Subgroups of rats in Group D were given famotidine (10 mg/kg) or lafutidine (30 mg/kg) orally once daily for 1 week after surgery. The rats were then sacrificed, and histological findings were compared.

Results

Intraesophageal pH was significantly lower in Group G than in Group C. At 12 weeks, the epithelium of the lower esophagus in Groups G and D was significantly thicker than that in Group C and showed remarkable hyperplastic changes in Group D. The thickness of the epithelium in Group D + famotidine did not differ significantly from that in Group D. In contrast, the epithelium was significantly thinner in Group D + lafutidine than in Group D.

Conclusions

As a rat model of reflux esophagitis, DER causes severer damage to the esophageal epithelium, including hyperplastic changes, than does GER. Famotidine had no apparent effect on esophageal epithelial damage caused by DER, whereas lafutidine was suggested to attenuate such damage.

     

Afferent signalling from the acid-challenged rat stomach is inhibited and gastric acid elimination is enhanced by lafutidine

Background  

Lafutidine is a histamine H₂ receptor antagonist, the gastroprotective effect of which is related to its antisecretory activity and its ability to activate a sensory neuron-dependent mechanism of defence. The present study investigated whether intragastric administration of lafutidine (10 and 30 mg/kg) modifies vagal afferent signalling, mucosal injury, intragastric acidity and gastric emptying after gastric acid challenge.     

Effect of lafutidine, a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist, on monochloramine-induced gastric lesions in rats: Role of capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons

BACKGROUND: Lafutidine ((+/-)-2-(furfurylsulfinyl)-N-(4-(4-(piperidinomethyl)-2-pyr idyl)oxy-(Z)-2-butenyl)acetamide) is a novel histamine H2-receptor antagonist and has been shown to exhibit a potent gastroprotective activity in addition to its antisecretory action. In the present study, we examined the effects of lafutidine on the mucosal ulcerogenic and potential difference (PD) responses induced by monochloramine (NH2Cl) in rat stomachs. METHODS: Oral administration of NH2Cl at 120 mmol/L produced haemorrhagic lesions in the stomach in unanaesthetized rats. RESULTS: Lafutidine (3-30mg/kg), given p.o., showed a dose-dependent and significant inhibition against damage caused by NH2Cl: the effect was significant at 10 mg/kg or greater but disappeared almost totally in the sensory deafferented animals following capsaicin pretreatment. Likewise, capsaicin (10 mg/kg, p.o.), but not cimetidine (100 mg/kg, p.o.) exhibited a potent protection against NH2Cl-induced gastric lesions. Topical application of NH2Cl (10 mmol/L) reduced transmucosal PD in ex-vivo stomachs of anaesthetized rats, but this PD response was also prevented by pre-exposure to lafutidine, in a dose-dependent and sensory neuron-sensitive manner. Mucosal exposure to NH4OH (60 mmol/L) also caused PD reduction in ex-vivo stomachs made ischaemic by bleeding from the carotid artery (1 mL/100 g bodyweight), resulting in severe gastric lesions. These ulcerogenic and PD responses caused by NH4OH plus ischaemia were attenuated by prior application of lafutidine as well as taurine, a scavenger of NH2Cl. The former effect was, again, dependent on the sensory neurons. Intraluminal capsaicin but not cimetidine was also effective in preventing a PD response to NH2Cl. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that lafutidine, but not cimetidine, protects the stomach against NH2Cl, whether occurring endogenously or administered exogenously and that this action may be mediated by capsaicin-sensitive sensory neurons.     

Effect of lafutidine,a histamine H2-receptor antagonist,on gastric mucosal blood flow and duodenal HCO3- secretion in rats: relation to capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurons

Lafutidine is a new type of antiulcer drug, possessing both an antisecretory effect, exerted via a blockade of the histamine H₂ receptor, and gastroprotective activity, mediated by capsaicin-sensitive afferent nerves (CSN). In the present study, we examined the effect of lafutidine on gastric mucosal blood flow (GMBF) and duodenal HCO₃ ^– secretion (DAS) under basal and acid-stimulated conditions in rats. Under urethane anesthesia, GMBF was measured using a laser Doppler flowmeter in a chambered stomach before and after exposure to 20 mM taurocholate (TC) plus 50 mM HCl, while DAS was measured in a proximal duodenal loop before and after mucosal acidification (10 mM HCl for 10 min) by titrating the perfusate at pH 7.0 using a pH-stat method and by adding 10 mM HCl. Lafutidine given intraperitoneally affected neither GMBF nor DAS under basal conditions, but augmented an increase in both GMBF and DAS induced by mucosal acidification. Although the acid-induced GMBF and DAS responses were significantly mitigated by both indomethacin and sensory deafferentation but not by ruthenium red (RT), the vanilloid receptor (VR)-1 antagonist, the responses were preserved in lafutidine-treated animals, even in the presence of indomethacin. Both GMBF and DAS were significantly increased by local application of capsaicin, the responses being attenuated by indomethacin and RT as well as sensory deafferentation. Lafutidine augmented the GMBF and DAS responses to capsaicin and preserved the responses, even in the presence of indomethacin. Capsaicin evoked an increase in [Ca²⁺]_i in rat VR1-transfected HEK293 cells, while lafutidine had no effect by itself on [Ca²⁺]_i in these cells and did not affect the increase in [Ca²⁺]_i evoked by capsaicin. In conclusion, these results suggest that lafutidine mimics endogenous effects of prostaglandins to augment the GMBF and DAS responses to acid or capsaicin, probably by sensitizing CSN through an unknown site other than VR1. The luminal H⁺ itself is not a ligand for the RT-sensitive site of VR1 but plays a modulator role in the CSN-mediated physiological responses.