Lenalidomide before and after autologous stem cell transplantation for transplant-eligible patients of all ages in the randomized,phase III,Myeloma XI trial

The optimal way to use immunomodulatory drugs as components of induction and maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma is unresolved. We addressed this question in a large phase III randomized trial, Myeloma XI. Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (n=2,042) were randomized to induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) or cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRD). Additional intensification therapy with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CVD) was administered before autologous stem-cell transplantation to patients with a suboptimal response to induction therapy using a response-adapted approach. After receiving high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation, eligible patients were further randomized to receive either lenalidomide alone or observation alone. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The CRD regimen was associated with significantly longer PFS (median: 36 vs. 33 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.75-0.96; P=0.0116) and OS (3-year OS: 82.9% vs. 77.0%; HR, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.93; P=0.0072) compared with CTD. The PFS and OS results favored CRD over CTD across all subgroups, including patients with International Staging System stage III disease (HR for PFS, 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.93; HR for OS, 0.78; 95% CI: 0.56-1.09), high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.43-0.84; HR for OS, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.42-1.15) and ultra-high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.67; 95% CI: 0.41-1.11; HR for OS, 0.65; 95% CI: 0.34-1.25). Among patients randomized to lenalidomide maintenance (n=451) or observation (n=377), maintenance therapy improved PFS (median: 50 vs. 28 months; HR, 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60; P<0.0001). Optimal results for PFS and OS were achieved in the patients who received CRD induction and lenalidomide maintenance. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2009-010956-93) and ISRCTN49407852.     

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2 Mutations as Prognostic Markers in Patients With Glioblastomas

The purpose of this study was to perform a meta-analysis examining the association of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)1/2 mutations with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with glioblastomas.Medline, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to January 28, 2015, using combinations of the following keywords: IDH mutation, brain tumor, glioma, glioblastoma, oligodendroglioma, prognosis. Randomized controlled trials, and prospective and retrospective studies of patients with glioblastomas that provided IDH mutation and survival data were included. OS and PFS were used to evaluate the association of IDH1 and IDH1/2 mutations and prognosis. Hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for OS and PFS were calculated and compared between patients with and without mutations.Of 165 studies that were identified, 136 nonrelevant studies were excluded. Twenty-nine full-text articles were assessed, and of these, 5 were excluded as they did not provide a quantitative outcome. Therefore, 24 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. The pooled HR of 0.358 (95% CI 0.264–0.487, P < 0.001) indicated that IDH mutations were associated with better OS. Similarly, the pooled HR of 0.322 (95% CI 0.24200.455, P < 0.001) indicated that IDH mutations were associated with better PFS. When patients were stratified by surgery versus no surgery or IDH1 versus IDH1/2 mutations, the results also indicated that the presence of IDH mutations was associated with better OS and PFS.The IDH mutations are associated with improved survival in patients with glioblastomas.     

Impact of KRAS mutation and PTEN expression on cetuximab-treated colorectal cancer

AIM:To investigate the prognostic value of KRAS mutation,and phosphatase and tensin (PTEN) expression in Chinese metastatic colorectal cancer metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients treated with cetuximab.METHODS:Ninety Chinese mCRC patients treated with cetuximab were evaluated for KRAS mutation and PTEN protein expression by DNA sequencing of codons 12 and 13 and immunohistochemistry,respectively.We then selected 61 patients treated with cetuximab,either in combination with chemotherapy,or alone as a second-line or third-line regimen to assess whether KRAS mutation or PTEN protein expression is associated with the response and the survival time of mCRC patients treated with cetuximab.RESULTS:KRAS mutation was found in 30 (33.3%) tumor samples from the 90 patients,and positive PTEN expression was detected in 58 (64.4%) of the 90 patients.Among the 61 patients who were treated with cetuximab as a second-line or third-line regimen,the resistance to cetuximab was found in 22 patients with KRAS mutation and in 39 patients without KRAS mutation,with a response rate of 4.5% and 46.1% respectively (P=0.001),a shorter median progression-free survival (PFS) time of 14 ± 1.3 wk and 32 ± 2.5 wk respectively (P < 0.001),a median overall survival (OS) time of 11 ± 1.2 mo and 19 ± 1.8 mo respectively (P < 0.001),as well as in 24 patients with negative PTEN expression and in 37 patients with positive PTEN expression respectively (P < 0.001),with a responsive rate of 4.2% and 48.6% respectively,a shorter median PFS survival time of 17 ± 2.0 wk and 28 ± 1.9 wk respectively (P=0.07),and a median OS time of 11 ± 1.3 mo and 18 ± 1.9 mo respectively (P=0.004).Combined KRAS mutation and PTEN expression analysis showed that the PFS and OS time of patients with two favorable prognostic factors were longer than those of patients with one favorable prognostic factor or no favorable prognostic factor (P < 0.001).CONCLUSION:KRAS mutation and PTEN protein expression are significantly correlated with the response ra     

A Meta-analysis Reveals S-1-based Chemotherapy Improves the Survival of Patients With Advanced Gastric Cancer

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of S-1-based therapy versus non-S-1-based therapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC) patients.Eligible studies stratifying objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) in AGC patients were identified from Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases. The STATA package (version 11.0) was used to pool the data from the eligible studies.Fifteen studies with 2973 AGC cases, of which 1497 (50.4%) received S-1-based therapy and 1476 (49.6%) received non-S-1-based therapy, were identified in the meta-analysis. AGC patients who had received S-1-based therapy had a higher median OS, median PFS, and ORR than those who had received 5-fluorouracil (FU)-based therapy (OS: hazard ratio [HR] 0.89, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.80–0.98, P = 0.015; PFS: HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.80–0.98, P = 0.016; ORR: OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.08–1.45, P = 0.003, respectively). S-1-based therapy had similar efficacy to capecitabine-based therapy in terms of median OS (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.91–1.41, P = 0.253), median PFS (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.82–1.25, P = 0.927), and ORR (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.63–1.12, P = 0.226). Subgroup analysis for grade 3 to 4 toxicity showed higher incidence of neutropenia (relative risk [RR] = 0.827, P = 0.006), nausea (RR = 0.808, P = 0.040), and lower diarrhea (RR = 1.716, P = 0.012) in 5-FU-based arm, and higher diarrhea (RR = 0.386, P = 0.007) in capecitabine-based arm.S-1-based chemotherapy is favorable to AGC patients with better clinical benefit than 5-FU-based chemotherapy and with equivalent antitumor compare with capecitabine-based therapy.     

S-1-based combination therapy vs S-1 monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer:A meta-analysis

AIM:To assess the efficacy and safety of combination therapy based on S-1,a novel oral fluoropyrimidine,vs S-1 monotherapy in advanced gastric cancer(AGC).METHODS:We searched PubMed,EMBASE and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies published before March 2013.Our analysis identified four randomized controlled trials involving 790 participants with AGC.The outcome measures were overall survival(OS),progression-free survival(PFS),overall response rate(ORR)and grade 3-4 adverse events.RESULTS:Meta-analysis showed that S-1-based combination therapy significantly improved OS(HR=0.77,95%CI:0.66-0.91,P=0.002),PFS(HR=0.58,95%CI:0.46-0.72,P=0.000)and ORR(OR=2.23,95%CI:1.54-3.21,P=0.000).Sensitivity analysis further confirmed this association.Lower incidence of grade 3-4 leucopenia(OR=4.06,95%CI:2.11-7.81),neutropenia(OR=3.94,95%CI:2.1-7.81)and diarrhea(OR=2.41,95%CI:1.31-4.44)was observed in patients with S-1 monotherapy.CONCLUSION:S-1-based combination therapy is superior to S-1 monotherapy in terms of OS,PFS and ORR.S-1 monotherapy is associated with less toxicity.     

Combined Analysis of EGFR and PTEN Status in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

To determine the relationship between the expression of phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and the clinical outcome of cetuximab-containing chemotherapy.A total of 158 consecutive mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS status who received chemotherapy with or without cetuximab, and for whom tumor tissue was available, were enrolled. The EGFR and PTEN expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC).A total of 158 mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS status were enrolled in the study; 51 patients received chemotherapy combined with cetuximab, 107 patients received chemotherapy alone. Patients who received chemotherapy combined with cetuximab had longer overall survival (OS) compared with patients who received chemotherapy alone. High EGFR expression was detected in 60 patients (38.0%), while normal PTEN expression was detected in 60 patients (59.5%). The PTEN status was significantly related with the histological grade. For patients who received chemotherapy combined with cetuximab the median OS of patients with high-expression of EGFR was longer than the OS of patients with low EGRF expression; 25.0 versus 19.0 months, P = 0.002. For patient with normal PTEN the median OS were longer than the median OS for patients with loss of PTEN; 24.0 versus 19.0 months, P = 0.026. The overall response rate (ORR) had a borderline association with EGFR and PTEN expression (P = 0.055 and 0.048, respectively). In a multivariate analysis, ECOG PS, EGFR status, chemotherapy ± cetuximab, and the interaction of EGFR or PTEN and chemotherapy ± cetuximab were independent prognostic factors for OS.Our findings show that chemotherapy combined with cetuximab demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity for mCRC patients with wild-type KRAS status. Especially, those who have high EGFR expression or normal PTEN expression were more likely to benefit from such a treatment strategy. Subsequent studies in clinical trial cohorts will be required to confirm the clinical utility of these markers.     

S-1-based vs non-S-1-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer: A meta-analysis

AIM: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of S-1-based vs non-S-1-based chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC).METHODS: We extracted reported endpoints, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse effects, from randomized controlled trials identified in PubMed, the Cochrane library, Science Direct, EMBASE and American Society of Clinical Oncology meetings. Stata software was used to calculate the pooled values.RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials involving 2176 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared to non-S-1-based regimens, the use of S-1-based regimens were associated with an increase in ORR (RR = 1.300; 95%CI: 1.028-1.645); OS (HR = 0.89; 95%CI: 0.81-0.99; P = 0.025), TTF (HR = 0.83; 95%CI: 0.75-0.92; P = 0.000), and a lower risk of febrile neutropenia (RR = 0.225; P = 0.000) and stomatitis (RR = 0.230; P = 0.032). OS, PFS and TTF were prolonged, especially in the Asian population. In subgroup analysis, statistically significant increases in ORR (RR = 1.454; P = 0.029), OS (HR = 0.895; P = 0.041) and TTF (HR = 0.832; P = 0.000) were found when S-1-based chemotherapy was compared to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. The incidence of leukopenia (RR = 0.584; P = 0.002) and stomatitis (RR = 0.230; P = 0.032) was higher in the 5-FU-based arm. S-1-based regimens had no advantage in ORR, OS, PFS, TTF and grade 3 or 4 adverse events over capecitabine-based regimens.CONCLUSION: S-1-based chemotherapy may be a good choice for AGC because of longer survival times, better tolerance and more convenient use.     

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine-capecitabine combination therapy for pancreatic cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background:Recent randomized controlled trials revealed the combination of gemcitabine and capecitabine (GemCap) regime shows promising efficacy in pancreatic cancer patients. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine (Gem) with GemCap for pancreatic cancer.Methods:The database of MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Controster of Controlled Trials, Web of Science was searched for relevant randomized controlled trials before 8 April, 2020. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), 12-month survival rate, progress free survival (PFS), partial response rate (PRR), objective response rate (ORR), and Grade 3/4 toxicities.Results:Five randomized controlled trials involving 1879 patients were included in this study. The results showed that GemCap significantly improves the OS (hazard ratio = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.037-1.276, P = .008), PFS (hazard ratio = 1.211, 95% CI 1.09-1.344, P = 0), PRR (relative risk (RR) = 0.649, 95% CI 0.488-0.862, P = .003), ORR (RR = 0.605, 95% CI 0.458-0.799, P = 0), and the overall toxicity (RR = 0.708, 95% CI 0.620-0.808, P = .000) compared to Gem alone. However, no significant difference was found in 12-month survival.Conclusions:Despite a higher incidence of Grade 3/4 toxicity, GemCap was associated with better outcomes of OS, PFS, PRR, ORR, as compared with Gem, which is likely to become a promising therapy for pancreatic cancer.     

免疫治疗相关性甲状腺功能异常与不可切除/晚期肝细胞癌患者预后改善相关

摘要 目的：探讨免疫治疗相关性甲状腺功能异常与不可切除/晚期肝细胞癌（HCC）患者预后改善的相关性。方法：回顾性分析45例接受免疫检查点抑制剂（ICIs）治疗的不可切除/晚期HCC患者。根据ICIs治疗过程中是否出现免疫相关性甲状腺功能异常分为甲状腺功能正常组（28例）和异常组（17例）,比较2组患者的预后和免疫应答情况,主要终点指标为中位总生存期（OS）、无进展生存期（PFS）,次要终点指标为疾病控制率（DCR）。结果：所有患者的中位OS、PFS分别为10.8个月（95% CI ：3.0~18.6）和5.0个月（95% CI ：3.0~12.2）。正常组中位OS为5.8个月（95% CI ：3.7~7.9）,异常组中位OS尚未达到（ P =0.026）。异常组中位PFS长于正常组（8.2个月 vs. 3.1个月, P =0.011）,DCR高于正常组（52.9% vs. 21.5%,P =0.030）。多因素Cox回归分析显示,甲状腺功能异常是达到6个月OS（ HR=0.213,95%CI ：0.048~0.944, P =0.042）和PFS（ HR=0.383,95%CI：0.151~0.967,P =0.042）的独立影响因素;甲状腺功能异常（ HR=0.403 ,95%CI：0.185~0.877,P =0.022）、基线无大血管侵犯（MVI）（ HR=2.848,95%CI：1.406~5.768,P =0.004）、Child-Pugh A级（ HR=2.404,95%：1.099~5.255,P =0.028）与12个月PFS相关。结论：免疫治疗相关性甲状腺功能异常的不可切除/晚期HCC患者预期生存和免疫应答效果更佳。治疗期间出现甲状腺功能异常、基线无MVI、Child-Pugh A级与患者预后改善相关。     

Imaging and bone marrow assessments improve minimal residual disease prediction in multiple myeloma

The value of minimal residual disease (MRD) status by bone marrow and imaging analysis as independent prognostic factors has been well established in multiple myeloma (MM). Nevertheless data about their potential complementarity for a more accurate assessment are limited. With this aim, we retrospectively analyzed the prediction of outcome with the combination of PET-CT and MRD, assessed by multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) in 103 patients with newly diagnosed MM. We confirmed the benefit in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), linked to the achievement of negativity by MFC (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.28-0.98), and PET-CT (HR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.09-0.36) individually. By combining both techniques, patients who became MRD-/PET-, with a median of PFS 92 months, had significant prolonged median PFS (P < .001). This is compared with MRD+/PET- and PET+ patients (median PFS of 45 and 28 months, respectively). We observed a significant difference (P = .003) in overall survival (OS) outcomes between MRD-/PET- and MRD+/PET- patients (4-year OS 94.2% and 100%, respectively), vs PET+ patients (4-year OS 73.8%). All survival results were confirmed in a conditional landmark analysis. These findings support the potential complementarity between PET-CT and MFC, and highlight their better predictive capability when improving sensitivity.     

Prognostic Significance of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor Expression in Renal Cell Carcinoma: A PRISMA-compliant Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The prognostic value of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has been evaluated in a large number of studies, but the reports were inconsistent and remained inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify the significance of HIF expression in RCC prognosis.PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EBSCO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Biological Abstracts were searched for eligible studies. Hazard ratio (HR) data for overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) with 95% confidence interval (CI) related to the expression status of HIF-1α or HIF-2α detected by immunohistochemistry were all extracted. Data were combined using a random- or fixed-effects model based on the corresponding inter-study heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses were also performed.A total of 14 studies composed of 1258 patients for HIF-1α evaluation and 619 patients for HIF-2α evaluation were included for further analysis. When initially analyzed as a whole, the HIF-1α expression was not significantly correlated with OS (HR 1.637, 95% CI 0.898–2.985, P = 0.108), CSS (HR 1.110, 95% CI 0.595–2.069, P = 0.744), and PFS (HR 1.113, 95% CI 0.675–1.836, P = 0.674). Similarly, HIF-2α expression was not significantly correlated with CSS (HR 1.597, 95% CI 0.667–3.824, P = 0.293) and PFS (HR 0.847, 95% CI 0.566–1.266, P = 0.417). However, subgroup analyses concerning subcellular localization of HIFs revealed that the high nuclear expression of HIF-1α was significantly associated with poor OS (HR 2.014, 95% CI 1.206–3.363, P = 0.007) and the high cytoplasmic expression of HIF -2α was significantly associated with poor CSS (HR 2.356, 95% CI 1.629–3.407, P = 0.000).The increased nuclear expression of HIF-1α and cytoplasmic expression of HIF-2α indicate unfavorable prognosis in RCC patients, which may serve as biomarkers for disease management.     

Maintenance treatment with the immunomodulator MGN1703, a Toll-like receptor 9 (TLR9) agonist,in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma and disease control after chemotherapy: a randomised,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

Purpose

This phase II study evaluated the synthetic DNA-based immunomodulator and Toll-like receptor 9 agonist MGN1703 as maintenance treatment in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC).

Methods

Fifty-nine patients with mCRC and disease control after standard first-line chemotherapy were randomised to MGN1703 60 mg (N = 43) or placebo (N = 16).

Results

The hazard ratio (HR) for the primary endpoint [progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of maintenance] was 0.56 (95 % CI 0.29–1.08; P = 0.07) and 0.55 (95 % CI 0.3–1.0; P = 0.04) by independent and investigator review, respectively. MGN1703 significantly improved PFS measured from the start of induction therapy versus placebo on independent (HR 0.49; 95 % CI 0.26–0.94; P = 0.03) and investigator review (HR 0.50; 95 % CI 0.31–1.02; P = 0.02). Overall survival (OS) data remain immature (HR 95 %; 95 % CI 0.3–1.5; P = 0.29) with 28/43 patients alive after a medium follow-up of >17 months. Retrospective subgroup analysis showed a significant effect of MGN1703 on PFS versus placebo in patients with greater than median tumour size reduction and normalised carcinoembryonic antigen concentrations following induction therapy, and in patients with elevated activated NKT cells ≥3.08 %. Adverse events were mild to moderate and limited to injection-site reactions or linked to general immune system activation.

Conclusions

MGN1703 maintenance treatment was well tolerated and appears to induce durable and prolonged PFS and disease control in a subgroup of patients with mCRC following induction therapy. Activated NKT cells may be a predictive biomarker for selecting patients likely to benefit more from MGN1703.     

Clinical outcomes of multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant with G-CSF or G-CSF and plerixafor mobilized grafts

Impact of Plerixafor (P) mobilized stem cells on immune reconstitution, such as absolute lymphocyte count at day 30 (ALC30), and on long-term outcomes of Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has not been well established. We evaluated total of 469 patients mobilized with G-CSF (G) alone, and 141 patients mobilized with G-CSF plus plerixafor (G+ P). Patients only received plerixafor if they had peripheral blood CD34⁺ blood count <20/μL on first planned day of collection. Primary endpoint, ALC30, was 1.3 K/μL (range, 0.1-4.5) and 1.2 K/μL (range, 0.1-5.1) for G and G + P, respectively (P =. 61). The median PFS was 2.5 years (95% CI, 2.1-3.2) and 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.0-3.3) for G and G + P, respectively (HR: 1.13; 95% CI, 0.84-1.50; P = .42). The median OS was 6.1 years (95% CI, 4.6-NR) for G group compared to 3.7 years (95% CI, 3.2-NR) for the G + P group (HR: 1.64; 95% CI, 1.12-2.40; P = .01). The median follow-up time for OS was 2.53 years (95% CI, 2.13-2.99) and 1.59 years (95% CI, 1.17-2.02) for G and G+ P group, respectively. In this large retrospective analysis of MM patients mobilized with G-CSF vs G-CSF + P, there was no significant difference in lymphocyte recovery or PFS. There was an overall survival difference in patients who were poor mobilizers and could not be mobilized with G-CSF alone.     

Prognostic and Clinicopathological Value of PD-L1 in Melanoma: A Meta-Analysis

BackgroundThere is a growing interest in using programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) as a prognostic marker for melanoma. We conducted this meta-analysis to explore the prognostic and clinicopathological value of PD-L1 in melanoma.Materials and MethodsThe electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. The major investigated parameters were PD-L1 expression levels in relation to patient gender, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), tumor stage, lymph node (LN) metastasis, histological type, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Odds ratios (ORs) and hazard ratios (HRs) were computed using the fixed-effect or random-effects model according to data heterogeneity.ResultsPositive PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with high levels of TILs (OR = 7.56, 95% CI 2.04-28.02), metastatic melanoma (OR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.30-0.67) and LN-positive melanoma (OR = 2.56, 95% CI 1.31-4.99) but not gender or histological type. In addition, the pooled HRs showed no relation between PD-L1 expression and PFS (HR = 1.18, 95% CI 0.83-1.69) or OS (HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.47-1.25). When restricted to metastatic melanoma, positive PD-L1 expression was significantly related to prolonged OS (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.46-0.70).ConclusionsPositive PD-L1 expression may be an important prognostic factor for longer OS in patients with metastatic melanoma.     

Elevated pretreatment serum globulin albumin ratio predicts poor prognosis for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

The aim of the present study was to explore the association between the pretreatment globulin albumin ratio (GAR) and the survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Methods

Patients hospitalized between January 2007 and December 2010 were enrolled and eliminated according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. GAR was defined as the absolute globulin value divided by the absolute albumin value. Chi-squared test was performed to compare clinical characteristics in different groups. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression model were used to determine independent prognostic factors. A P value of ≤0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Total 316 patients were finally enrolled. The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 210.0 and 430.0 days, respectively. The statistical analyses indicated that pretreatment GAR >0.58 [hazard ratio (HR) =1.52, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.12-2.08, P=0.008 for PFS, HR =1.65, 95% CI: 1.20-2.26, P=0.002 for OS], and pretreatment albumin ≤35 g/L (HR =2.09, 95% CI: 1.20-3.65, P=0.003 for PFS, HR =1.92, 95% CI: 1.10-3.36, P=0.022 for OS) were independent prognostic factors for both PFS and OS.

Conclusions

Our study first established a connection between pretreatment GAR and advanced NSCLC patients, suggesting that GAR was an independent prognostic factor and could be the biomarker for prognosis.     

Treatment and Prognoses in Patients With Primary Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors ≥10?cm: A Single-Institution Experience in China

Data on treatments and specific outcomes of primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) ≥10 cm are limited. We here report the treatments and survival outcomes concerning a subgroup of primary giant GISTs.Data of 83 consecutive patients with primary GISTs ≥10 cm in a single institution were retrospectively collected. Fifty-eight patients underwent surgery before imatinib mesylate (IM) treatment (Group A), 10 underwent surgical resection following IM therapy (Group B), whereas 15 patients took IM as drug therapy alone (Group C).The baseline clinical characteristics were similar among the 3 groups. However, a lower proportion in Group A had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis or surgery compared with Groups B and C (8.6% vs 40.0% vs 40.0%, P < 0.05). The median follow-up duration was 21.5 months. No statistically significant differences were observed on progression-free survival (PFS) among the groups. However, patients in Group B showed significantly better overall survival (OS) compared with those in Group C (P = 0.044). Multivariate analysis showed that patients treated with adjuvant IM were associated with better PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 3.01; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13–7.97; P = 0.027) and OS (HR 29.11; 95% CI 3.32–125.36; P = 0.004). The subgroup with mitotic count >10/50 high-power fields (HPF) showed worse PFS (HR 3.50; 95% CI 1.19–10.25; P = 0.022) and OS (HR 20.04; 95% CI 1.67–143.79; P = 0.018) than that of mitotic count ≤5/50 HPF.Clinical treatment patterns for primary giant GISTs are different, and the outcomes of different interventions vary. The optimal treatments for these subgroup of patients still require further long-term investigation. Moreover, mitotic count and adjuvant IM are closely associated with PFS and OS in giant GISTs.     

Prognostic value of the systemic inflammation response index in human malignancy: A meta-analysis

Background:This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) in malignancy based on existing evidence.Methods:We searched for relevant literature published in the electronic databases PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase before April 10, 2020. Hazard ratios (HR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and pooled to evaluate the relationship between SIRI and malignancy outcomes.Results:We included 14 articles, describing 6,035 patients. Our findings revealed that patients with high SIRI had worse overall survival (OS) (HR = 2.20, 95% CI: 1.85–2.62, P < .001), disease-free survival (DFS) (HR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.49–2.48, P < .001), time-to-progression (TTP) (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.55–2.58, P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.38–2.16, P < .001), cancer-specific survival (CSS) (HR: 3.57, 95% CI: 2.25–5.68, P < 0.001), disease-specific survival (DSS) (HR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.46 - 2.72, P < .001), and metastasis-free survival (MFS) (HR: 2.26, 95% CI: 1.28–3.99, P = .005) than patients with low SIRI. The correlation between SIRI and OS did not change in a subgroup analysis. Meta-regression indicated that heterogeneity may be related to differences in primary therapy strategies. Sensitivity analysis suggested that our results were reliable.Conclusions:SIRI could be used as a useful predictor of poor prognosis during malignancy treatment.     

Genetic polymorphisms in oxidative stress‐related genes are associated with outcomes following treatment for aggressive B‐cell non‐Hodgkin lymphoma

Variable survival outcomes are seen following treatment for aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). This study examined whether outcomes for aggressive B‐cell NHL are associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in oxidative stress‐related genes, which can alter drug metabolism and immune responses. Genotypes for 53 SNPs in 29 genes were determined for 337 patients given anthracycline‐based therapies. Their associations with progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by Cox proportional hazard regression; associations with hematologic toxicity were estimated by logistic regression. To validate the findings, the top three SNPs were tested in an independent cohort of 572 DLBCL patients. The top SNPs associated with PFS in the discovery cohort were the rare homozygotes for MPO rs2243828 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14–3.06, P = 0.013), AKR1C3 rs10508293 (HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.28–3.41, P = 0.0032) and NCF4 rs1883112 (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.43–1.02, P = 0.06). The association of the NCF4 SNP with PFS was replicated in the validation dataset (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.44–1.01, P = 0.05) and the meta‐analysis was significant (HR = 0.66, 95% CI = 0.49–0.89, P < 0.01). The association of the MPO SNP was attenuated in the validation dataset, while the meta‐analysis remained significant (HR = 1.64, 95% CI = 1.12–2.41). These two SNPs showed similar trends with OS in the meta‐analysis (for NCF4, HR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.51–1.02, P = 0.07 and for MPO, HR = 2.06, 95% CI = 1.36–3.12, P < 0.01). In addition, patients with the rare homozygote of the NCF4 SNP had an increased risk of hematologic toxicity. We concluded that genetic variations in NCF4 may contribute to treatment outcomes for patients with aggressive NHL. Am. J. Hematol. 89:639–645, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

The prognostic value of inflammation markers in postoperative gliomas with or without adjuvant treatments

Recent studies have shown that some inflammatory markers are associated with the prognosis of solid tumors. This study aims to evaluate the prognosis of glioma patients with or without adjuvant treatment using the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR).All patients who were diagnosed with gliomas at the first and second affiliated hospital of Guangxi Medical University between 2011 and 2020 were included in this study. The optimal cutoff value of SII, NLR, and PLR was determined by X-tile software program. We stratified patients into several groups and evaluated the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of SII, NLR, and PLR during the period of pre-surgical, con-chemoradiotherapy, and post-treatments. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to detect the relationships between OS, PFS, and prognostic variables.A total of 67 gliomas patients were enrolled in the study. The cutoff values of SII, NLR, and PLR were 781.5 × 10⁹/L, 2.9 × 10⁹/L, and 123.2 × 10⁹/L, respectively. Patients who are pre-SII < 781.5 × 10⁹/L had better PFS (P = .027), but no difference in OS. In addition, patients who had low pre-NLR (<2.9 × 10⁹/L) meant better OS and PFS. PLR after adjuvant treatments (post-PLR) was significantly higher than pre-PLR (P = .035). Multivariate analyses revealed that pre-SII, pre-NLR were independent prognostic factors for OS (pre-SII: HR 1.002, 95% CI: 1.000–1.005, P = .030 and pre-PLR: HR 0.983, 95% CI: 0.973–0.994, P = .001), while pre-PLR was an independent factor for PFS (HR 0.989, 95% CI: 0.979–1.000, P = .041).High pre-SII or high pre-NLR could be prognostic markers to identify glioma patients who had a poor prognosis.     

Bendamustine in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Outcome according to different clinical and biological prognostic factors in the everyday clinical practice

Bendamustine proved to be effective for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, the relationship between its activity with clinico‐biological prognosticators has been addressed only in few studies. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of bendamustine, in a real‐life contest, on 142 patients, median age 70 years, median number of previous regimens 2 (0–8, 13% previously untreated). Bendamustine was administered for a median number of 4 cycles, in 84% of cases with rituximab. Overall (ORR) and complete response (CRR) rates were 68 and 16.5%, respectively. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a relationship between ORR and number of prior treatments (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08–0.71; P = 0.009), del(17p) (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.03–0.32; P < 0.001) and concomitant rituximab (OR 4.37, 95% CI 1.12–17.04; P = 0.033). The estimated 1‐ and 2‐years overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) rates were 76, 61, 51, and 26%, respectively. Previous sensitivity to fludarabine (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16–0.82), response to bendamustine (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10–0.45), and del(17p) (HR 2.18, 95% CI 1.002–4.74) had a prognostic significance in multivariate analysis for PFS, while the number of previous therapies (HR 3.48, 95% CI 1.29–9.38; P = 0.014), concomitant use of rituximab (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.11–0.93) and response to bendamustine (HR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07–0.66) were significant for OS. Side effects included grade 3–4 neutropenia, infections, thrombocytopenia and anemia which occurred in 40, 14, 14, and 10% of patients, respectively. These results confirm the activity and safety of bendamustine and rituximab combination even in patients with unfavorable clinical and biological features excluding del(17p). Am. J. Heamtol. 88:955–960, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.