Clinical and pathological characterization of progressive aphasia

OBJECTIVE: The clinical and neuropathological categorization of patients presenting with progressive aphasia is an area of controversy. This study aimed to characterize a large group of progressive aphasic patients from a single center (n = 38), first clinically by case note review, and then pathologically. METHODS: Hierarchical cluster analysis of the cases according to their clinical language deficits was used to establish an unbiased, data-driven classification. RESULTS: This analysis revealed two groups of cases corresponding to the syndromes of progressive nonfluent aphasia (n = 23) and semantic dementia (n = 15). Postmortem analysis showed a majority in both groups of pathologies from the spectrum of frontotemporal lobar degeneration: the most frequent were non-Alzheimer's disease (AD) tauopathy in the nonfluent cases (10 of 23) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions in the fluent cases (8 of 15). Despite rigorous exclusion of cases with clinically significant memory deficits or other cognitive impairments, the pathology of AD was present in approximately one third of each group (overall 12 of 38), although often with an atypical neuroanatomical distribution. INTERPRETATION: Progressive aphasia is best seen as a composite of two conditions, on both clinical and pathological levels: progressive nonfluent aphasia and semantic dementia.     

Frontotemporal dementia: clinicopathological correlations

OBJECTIVE: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is characterized by impairments in social, behavioral, and/or language function, but postmortem studies indicate that multiple neuropathological entities lead to FTLD. This study assessed whether specific clinical features predict the underlying pathology. METHODS: A clinicopathological correlation was performed on 90 consecutive patients with a pathological diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and was compared with an additional 24 cases accrued during the same time period with a clinical diagnosis of FTLD, but with pathology not typically associated with frontotemporal dementia. RESULTS: Postmortem examination showed multiple pathologies including tauopathies (46%), FTLD with ubiquitin-positive inclusions (29%), and Alzheimer's disease (17%). The pathological groups manifested some distinct demographic, clinical, and neuropsychological features, although these attributes showed only a statistical association with the underlying pathology. FTLD with ubiquitin-positive inclusions was more likely to present with both social and language dysfunction, and motor neuron disease was more likely to emerge in these patients. Tauopathies were more commonly associated with an extrapyramidal disorder. Alzheimer's disease was associated with relatively greater deficits in memory and executive function. INTERPRETATION: Clinical and neuropsychological features contribute to delineating the spectrum of pathology underlying a patient diagnosed with FTLD, but biomarkers are needed that, together with the clinical phenotype, can predict the underlying neuropathology.     

Ubiquitin-positive inclusions and progression of pathology in frontotemporal dementia and motor neurone disease identifies a group with mainly early pathology

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with tau-negative, ubiquitin-positive inclusions has been a topic of major interest in recent years, with this group now accounting for the majority of tau-negative cases of frontotemporal degeneration. The severity of neurodegeneration in FTLD is dependent on the stage of disease and is substantial even in the earliest stages. Elucidating the pathogenesis of FTLD requires evaluation of changes during the earliest possible stage of disease. However, the long survival of most frontotemporal dementia cases means that cases with early neuropathology are not frequently encountered. Cases of FTLD with the shortest survival are those with coexisting motor neurone disease (FTLD + MND), making these the ideal group for studying early FTLD pathology. It is not clear, however, what the pathological contribution of MND is in these cases. This study evaluates the pathology of 20 cases of FTLD (11 with no clinical signs of MND and nine with FTLD + MND) as well as 10 cases of MND without dementia. Our findings indicate that the deposition of ubiquitin does not play a key role in the neurodegenerative process in FTLD, and that the severity of neurodegeneration in FTLD is similar in cases with and without clinical MND.     

HDDD2 is a familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions caused by a missense mutation in the signal peptide of progranulin

OBJECTIVE: Familial autosomal dominant frontotemporal dementia with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions in the brain linked to 17q21-22 recently has been reported to carry null mutations in the progranulin gene (PGRN). Hereditary dysphasic disinhibition dementia (HDDD) is a frontotemporal dementia with prominent changes in behavior and language deficits. A previous study found significant linkage to chromosome 17 in a HDDD family (HDDD2), but no mutation in the MAPT gene. Longitudinal follow-up has enabled us to identify new cases and to further characterize the dementia in this family. The goals of this study were to develop research criteria to classify the different clinical expressions of dementia observed in this large kindred, to identify the causal mutation in affected individuals and correlate this with phenotypic characteristics in this pedigree, and to assess the neuropathological characteristics using immunohistochemical techniques. METHODS: In this study we describe a detailed clinical, pathological and mutation analysis of the HDDD2 kindred. RESULTS: Neuropathologically, HDDD2 represents a familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions (FTLD-U). We developed research classification criteria and identified three distinct diagnostic thresholds, which helped localize the disease locus. The chromosomal region with the strongest evidence of linkage lies within the minimum critical region for FTLD-U. Sequencing of each exon of the PGRN gene led to the identification of a novel missense mutation, Ala-9 Asp, within the signal peptide. INTERPRETATION: HDDD2 is an FTLD-U caused by a missense mutation in the PGRN gene that cosegregates with the disease and with the disease haplotype in at-risk individuals. This mutation is the first reported pathogenic missense mutation in the signal peptide of the PGRN gene causing FTLD-U. In light of the previous reports of null mutations and its position in the gene, two possible pathological mechanisms are proposed: (1) the protein may accumulate within the endoplasmic reticulum due to inefficient secretion; and (2) mutant RNA may have a lower expression because of degradation via nonsense-mediated decay.     

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration and dementia with Lewy bodies: Clinicopathological issues associated with antemortem diagnosis

Currently, the clinical diagnostic criteria of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) are well known to neurologists and psychiatrists. However, the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of these diseases in autopsy series is not always adequate. For example, FTLD is a syndrome rather than a clinicopathological disease entity that is comprised of various pathological substrates, including Pick's disease, FTLD with microtubule-associated protein tau gene mutation, FTLD with tau-negative ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U), FTLD-U with progranulin gene mutation, corticobasal degeneration, basophilic inclusion body disease, and neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease. Whether these underlying pathologies can be identified clinically is one of the greatest interests in neuropathological research. The pathophysiological relationship between Lewy pathology and Alzheimer pathology in DLB is explored with interest because it may be associated with the accuracy of clinical diagnoses. For example, although Lewy pathology may progress from the brain stem nuclei to the cerebral cortex in Parkinson's disease, recent studies have demonstrated that the progression pattern in DLB is not always identical to that in Parkinson's disease. It is also considered that the progression pattern of Lewy pathology correlates with the evolution of clinical symptoms and that the progression pattern of Lewy pathology may be altered when Alzheimer pathology coexists. In the present paper, the clinicopathological features of two demented cases are presented, and some pathological issues associated with the clinical diagnosis of FTLD and DLB are discussed.     

Frontotemporal dementia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The syndromes of frontotemporal lobar degeneration are increasingly recognized as an important cause of early-onset dementia. Diagnostic consensus criteria have now been established for almost a decade, and form the framework for its clinical classification. While these criteria remain useful, a growing body of evidence suggests that revisions may be necessary to improve their validity and applicability. RECENT FINDINGS: In each individual syndrome, the core features are not uniformly present, and criteria that are currently used to exclude a condition, such as impaired episodic memory, are often present. Imaging, however, may warrant increased diagnostic prominence, particularly for diagnosis in semantic dementia and prognosis in behavioural syndromes. There is clinical and pathological overlap between the syndromes, but the clinical distinction between progressive nonfluent aphasia and semantic dementia is strengthening. Several series have refined our understanding of the correspondence between clinical syndromes and histopathological subtype: strong for tau-negative, ubiquitin-positive forms and more variable for tau-positive forms, yet prospective studies are still rare. The influence of genetic factors varies substantially across the syndromes. SUMMARY: Further research should aim to integrate detailed clinical, radiological, pathological and genetic information.     

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration – tau as a pied piper?

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is the second most-common form of cortical dementia in the presenium after Alzheimer disease. Clinically three disease entities can be distinguished: frontotemporal dementia, semantic dementia, and primary progressive aphasia. The underlying neuropathology can be classified into disorders with tau pathology (including Pick disease, corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, and familial frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 – FTDP-17), and into disorders that lack tau abnormalities (including dementia lacking distinctive histology and motor neuron disease inclusion dementia). The recent discovery of tau gene mutations in FTDP-17 brought tau to the center stage, but led to the erroneous trend of collectively grouping all forms of FTLD as tauopathies. However, clinicopathological and genetic studies strongly suggest that the majority of sporadic and familial FTLD cases are not associated with tau pathology and/or tau gene mutations. Furthermore, recent studies have linked several autosomal dominantly inherited familial frontotemporal dementia cases to a variety of gene loci on different chromosomes. Thus, this review is intended to summarize our current knowledge about the sporadic and familial FTLD disorders that lack tau pathology, and shall further strengthen the view that FTLD is heterogeneous, both in terms of clinicopathological phenotypes as well as genetic backgrounds. Electronic Publication     

Screening for the LRRK2 G2019S and codon-1441 mutations in a pathological series of parkinsonian syndromes and frontotemporal lobar degeneration

BACKGROUND: The neuropathology associated with LRRK2 mutations is heterogeneous but Lewy body (LB) type pathology is the most common substrate encountered. While the prevalence of LRRK2 mutations has been extensively studied in Parkinson's disease (PD), limited information is available on the frequency of LRRK2 mutations in dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and in other pathological conditions associated with these mutations, such as non-specific nigral degeneration without LB, tau-immunopositive neurofibrillary tangle pathology, and ubiquitin-positive neuronal inclusions resembling those observed in a subtype of frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD-U). OBJECTIVE: To further investigate the neuropathology associated with LRRK2 mutations. METHODS: We have screened for the LRRK2 G2019S and codon-1441 (R1441G/C/H) mutations in 110 cases from a Spanish Brain Bank, which include: 66 synucleinopathies (33 PD, 25 DLB and 8 multiple system atrophy cases), 29 tauopathies (21 progressive supranuclear palsy, 3 corticobasal degeneration and 5 tau-positive FTLD cases), 3 cases of non-specific nigral degeneration and 12 tau-negative FTLD (9 FTLD-U and 3 dementia lacking distinctive histology cases). RESULTS: The G2019S mutation was found in two cases: One case had a clinical and pathological diagnosis of PD and the other suffered from typical PD and on neuropathological examination had non-specific nigral degeneration without LB. A synonymous variant (R1441R; c.4323C>T) was detected in another PD case. CONCLUSIONS: In this brain bank-based series, LRRK2 G2019S mutation occurred in patients with parkinsonism associated with either typical brainstem LB pathology or non-specific nigral degeneration. LRRK2 mutations were not encountered in other neurodegenerative disorders associated with synuclein and tau deposition.     

TDP-43-negative FTLD-U is a significant new clinico-pathological subtype of FTLD

Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions (FTLD-U) is the most common neuropathological subtype of frontotemporal dementias. While TDP-43 is the pathologic protein in the majority of FTLD-U cases, small numbers of cases have recently been reported with TDP-43-negative FTLD-U pathology. To determine the frequency and to define the clinico-pathological spectrum of TDP-43-negative FTLD-U, we re-evaluated 44 cases with a previous diagnosis of FTLD-U or dementia lacking distinctive histopathology. We identified nine cases (20%) with TDP-43-negative FTLD-U pathology by immunohistochemistry and confirmed the absence of pathological TDP-43 by biochemical analysis. All patients presented with sporadic early-onset frontotemporal dementia with predominant behavioral and personality changes. Besides ubiquitin-positive neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions, the most intriguing neuropathological feature was the presence of ubiquitin-positive neuronal intranuclear inclusions (NIIs), often with curved or twisted morphology, in the neocortex, hippocampus, brainstem, and spinal cord. Double-label immunofluorescence revealed an unusual and distinct immunoreactivity profile for these NIIs, with ubiquitin-immunoreactivity, but absence of p62 labeling. The highly consistent clinical and neuropathological phenotype supports the concept that TDP-43-negative FTLD-U should be considered as a new clinicopathological FTLD entity.     

Clinical, genetic, and pathologic characteristics of patients with frontotemporal dementia and progranulin mutations

BACKGROUND: Patients with frontotemporal dementia due to mutation of progranulin may have a distinct phenotype. OBJECTIVE: To identify distinct clinical and pathologic features of patients with frontotemporal dementia who have mutations of progranulin (GRN). DESIGN: Retrospective clinical-pathologic study. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight patients with frontotemporal dementia, including 9 with GRN mutations (4 autopsy cases and 5 with only clinical information) and 19 with the identical pathologic diagnosis--frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive and tau-negative inclusions (FTLD-U)--and no GRN mutations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic, symptom, neuropsychological, and autopsy characteristics. RESULTS: Patients with and without a GRN mutation have similar demographic features, although family history is significantly more common in patients with frontotemporal dementia and a GRN mutation. Both patient groups have frequent social and personality complaints. Neuropsychological evaluation reveals a significant recognition memory deficit in patients with a GRN mutation but a significant language deficit only in patients without a GRN mutation. At autopsy, the semiquantitative burden of ubiquitin abnormality is relatively modest in both groups of patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with a GRN mutation differ clinically from those with the same pathologic diagnosis but no GRN mutation.     

Clinicopathological and genetic correlates of frontotemporal lobar degeneration and corticobasal degeneration

Objective To correlate clinical diagnosis and genetic features with different pathological substrates in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Methods 32 cases with pathological proven FTLD or CBD were selected. Patients were classified clinically as frontotemporal dementia (FTD), progressive nonfluent aphasia (PNFA), semantic dementia (SD), CBD or FLTD with motor neuron disease (FLTDMND). Coding exons 1 and 9–13 of MAPT and exons 0–12 of the PGRN gene were screened by direct sequencing. Regarding the neuropathological findings, cases were classified as tau-positive, ubiquitinpositive tau-negative (FTLD-U), neuronal intermediate filaments inclusions disease (NIFID), dementia lacking distinctive histology (DLDH) or CBD. Results 17 patients were clinically diagnosed with FTD. Ten showed tau pathology, 3 FTLD-U, 1 NIFID and 3 DLDH. All patients clinically classified as FTLD-MND (6 patients) or SD (3 patients) were FTLD-U. Tau-positive pathology was the substrate of the three patients with PNFA. All three patients classified clinically as CBD presented neuropathologic features of CBD. The three individuals with familial history of early onset FTD and tau-positive pathology carried the P301L mutation in the MAPT gene. One out of 3 cases with FTLD-U and intranuclear inclusions carried a mutation in the PGRN gene. Conclusions We found that pathology underlying sporadic FTD is heterogeneous and not predictable. MAPT mutations and clinical diagnosis of PNFA and CBD were associated with tau-positive pathology. The presence of signs of lower MND and SD correlated with FTLD-U.A genetic study of MAPT is only recommended when familial history of early onset DFT is present. * Other members of the Catalan collaborative Study Group for FTLD are listed in the Appendix.     

Clinical features of pathologic subtypes of behavioral--variant frontotemporal dementia

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical features in behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia that may help predict tau-positive pathology. METHODS: Clinical and historical features of patients with pathologically confirmed tau-positive and tau-negative frontotemporal lobar degeneration from 1970 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed in a blinded fashion. The initial clinical features of those patients who eventually met consensus criteria for frontotemporal dementia were examined using univariate and cluster analyses to explore characteristics that may be associated with tau pathology. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients (24 tau-positive cases) were included in the analysis. There was no difference in demographics between the tau-positive and tau-negative cases. Univariate analysis showed that poor planning and/or judgment was more commonly associated with tau-positive pathology (P = .03). Cluster analysis using behavioral characteristics identified 2 groups of patients: cluster 1 contained mainly tau-positive cases (57%) and cluster 2 was mostly tau-negative cases (71%). Poor planning and/or judgment was a common presenting sign in the first group (P < .001), while the second group was more likely to present with impaired regulation of personal conduct (P < .001) and a decline in personal hygiene (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: Poor planning and/or judgment was associated with behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia patients who had tau-positive pathology. The constellation of impaired personal conduct and a paucity of dysexecutive symptoms identified tau-negative patients.     

Neuropathologic diagnostic and nosologic criteria for frontotemporal lobar degeneration: consensus of the Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration

The aim of this study was to improve the neuropathologic recognition and provide criteria for the pathological diagnosis in the neurodegenerative diseases grouped as frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD); revised criteria are proposed. Recent advances in molecular genetics, biochemistry, and neuropathology of FTLD prompted the Midwest Consortium for Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration and experts at other centers to review and revise the existing neuropathologic diagnostic criteria for FTLD. The proposed criteria for FTLD are based on existing criteria, which include the tauopathies [FTLD with Pick bodies, corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy, sporadic multiple system tauopathy with dementia, argyrophilic grain disease, neurofibrillary tangle dementia, and FTD with microtubule-associated tau (MAPT) gene mutation, also called FTD with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 (FTDP-17)]. The proposed criteria take into account new disease entities and include the novel molecular pathology, TDP-43 proteinopathy, now recognized to be the most frequent histological finding in FTLD. TDP-43 is a major component of the pathologic inclusions of most sporadic and familial cases of FTLD with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions (FTLD-U) with or without motor neuron disease (MND). Molecular genetic studies of familial cases of FTLD-U have shown that mutations in the progranulin (PGRN) gene are a major genetic cause of FTLD-U. Mutations in valosin-containing protein (VCP) gene are present in rare familial forms of FTD, and some families with FTD and/or MND have been linked to chromosome 9p, and both are types of FTLD-U. Thus, familial TDP-43 proteinopathy is associated with defects in multiple genes, and molecular genetics is required in these cases to correctly identify the causative gene defect. In addition to genetic heterogeneity amongst the TDP-43 proteinopathies, there is also neuropathologic heterogeneity and there is a close relationship between genotype and FTLD-U subtype. In addition to these recent significant advances in the neuropathology of FTLD-U, novel FTLD entities have been further characterized, including neuronal intermediate filament inclusion disease. The proposed criteria incorporate up-to-date neuropathology of FTLD in the light of recent immunohistochemical, biochemical, and genetic advances. These criteria will be of value to the practicing neuropathologist and provide a foundation for clinical, clinico-pathologic, mechanistic studies and in vivo models of pathogenesis of FTLD.     

Semantic dementia: a unique clinicopathological syndrome

Semantic dementia (SD), one of the main clinical variants of frontotemporal dementia, presents a unique combination of clinical and imaging abnormalities. We describe the epidemiological, cognitive, and radiological features of SD. The distinctive and consistent neuropsychological deficits in this disorder have had a major effect on current conceptions of the organisation of semantic memory and its links to episodic memory, language, and perceptual processes. Structural (MRI) and functional (fluorodeoxyglucose-PET) studies in SD emphasise the role of the temporopolar and perirhinal cortices. Unlike other frontotemporal dementia syndromes, the neuropathological findings in SD are fairly predictable: most patients have ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative neuronal inclusions.     

TDP-43-immunoreactive neuronal and glial inclusions in the neostriatum in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with and without dementia

TDP-43 is a major component of ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. We immunohistochemically examined the neostriatum from 14 cases of classic ALS (cALS), six cases of ALS with dementia (ALS-D), and 20 control subjects. TDP-43-positive, crescent or circular inclusions were found in neostriatal small neurons in 19 of 20 cases of ALS, but not in controls. Two types of inclusions were found in the large neurons: ubiquitin-positive, TDP-43-negative rod-like inclusions, and ubiquitin- and TDP-43-positive pleomorphic inclusions. The latter were specific to ALS; they were found in seven cases of cALS and in all of ALS-D. TDP-43-positive glial inclusions were also found in 12 cases of cALS and in all of ALS-D. These TDP-43-positive neuronal and glial inclusions were more numerous in ALS-D than cALS. In ALS-D, neuronal loss in the substantia nigra was found in all the cases, whereas mild gliosis without obvious neuronal loss was noted in the neostriaum in only two cases. These findings suggest that the neostriatum is also involved in the disease process of ALS with and without dementia.     

Clinical, genetic and pathological heterogeneity of frontotemporal dementia: a review

Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is the second most common young-onset dementia and is clinically characterised by progressive behavioural change, executive dysfunction and language difficulties. Three clinical syndromes, behavioural variant FTD, semantic dementia and progressive non-fluent aphasia, form part of a clinicopathological spectrum named frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD). The classical neuropsychological phenotype of FTD has been enriched by tests exploring Theory of Mind, social cognition and emotional processing. Imaging studies have detailed the patterns of atrophy associated with different clinical and pathological subtypes. These patterns offer some diagnostic utility, while measures of progression of atrophy may be of use in future trials. 30-50% of FTD is familial, and mutations in two genes, microtubule associated protein tau and Progranulin (GRN), account for about half of these cases. Rare defects in VCP, CHMP2B, TARDP and FUS genes have been found in a small number of families. Linkage to chromosome 9p13.2-21.3 has been established in familial FTD with motor neuron disease, although the causative gene is yet to be identified. Recent developments in the immunohistochemistry of FTLD, and also in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), have led to a new pathological nomenclature. The two major groups are those with tau-positive inclusions (FTLD-tau) and those with ubiquitin-positive and TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa (TDP-43) positive inclusions (FTLD-TDP). Recently, a new protein involved in familial ALS, fused in sarcoma (FUS), has been found in FTLD patients with ubiquitin-positive and TDP-43-negative inclusions. In this review, the authors discuss recent clinical, neuropsychological, imaging, genetic and pathological developments that have changed our understanding of FTD, its classification and criteria. The potential to establish an early diagnosis, predict underlying pathology during life and quantify disease progression will all be required for disease-specific therapeutic trials in the future.     

Clinically undetected motor neuron disease in pathologically proven frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease

BACKGROUND: Frontotemporal lobar degeneration with motor neuron disease (FTLD-MND) is a pathological entity characterized by motor neuron degeneration and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. The ability to detect the clinical signs of dementia and motor neuron disease in pathologically confirmed FTLD-MND has not been assessed. OBJECTIVES: To determine if all cases of pathologically confirmed FTLD-MND have clinical evidence of frontotemporal dementia and motor neuron disease, and to determine the possible reasons for misdiagnosis. METHOD: Review of historical records and semiquantitative analysis of the motor and extramotor pathological findings of all cases of pathologically confirmed FTLD-MND. RESULTS: From a total of 17 cases of pathologically confirmed FTLD-MND, all had clinical evidence of frontotemporal dementia, while only 10 (59%) had clinical evidence of motor neuron disease. Semiquantitative analysis of motor and extramotor pathological findings revealed a spectrum of pathological changes underlying FTLD-MND. Hippocampal sclerosis, predominantly of the subiculum, was a significantly more frequent occurrence in the cases without clinical evidence of motor neuron disease (P<.01). In addition, neuronal loss, gliosis, and corticospinal tract degeneration were less severe in the other 3 cases without clinical evidence of motor neuron disease. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical diagnostic sensitivity for the elements of FTLD-MND is modest and may be affected by the fact that FTLD-MND represents a spectrum of pathological findings, rather than a single homogeneous entity. Detection of signs of clinical motor neuron disease is also difficult when motor neuron degeneration is mild and in patients with hippocampal sclerosis.     

Neuropathologic heterogeneity in HDDD1: a familial frontotemporal lobar degeneration with ubiquitin-positive inclusions and progranulin mutation

Hereditary dysphasic disinhibition dementia (HDDD) describes a familial disorder characterized by personality changes, and language and memory deficits. The neuropathology includes frontotemporal lobar atrophy, neuronal loss and gliosis and, in most cases, abundant Abeta plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs). A Pick/Alzheimer's spectrum was proposed for the original family (HDDD1). Here we report the clinicopathologic case of an HDDD1 individual using modern immunohistochemical methods, contemporary neuropathologic diagnostic criteria to distinguish different frontotemporal lobar degenerations (FTLDs), and progranulin (PRGN) mutation analysis. Clinical onset was at age 62 years with personality changes and disinhibition, followed by nonfluent dysphasia, and memory loss that progressed to muteness and total dependence with death at age 84 years. There was severe generalized brain atrophy (weight=570 g). Histopathology showed superficial microvacuolation, marked neuronal loss, gliosis, and ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative cytoplasmic and intranuclear neuronal inclusions in frontal, temporal, and parietal cortices. There were also frequent neuritic plaques and NFTs in parietal and occipital cortices. The case met neuropathologic criteria for both FTLD with ubiquitin-positive, tau-negative inclusions (FTLD-U), and Alzheimer disease (Braak NFT stage V). We discovered a novel pathogenic PGRN mutation c.5913 A>G (IVS6-2 A>G) segregating with FTLD-U in this kindred. In conclusion, HDDD1 is an FTLD-U caused by a PGRN mutation and is neuropathologically heterogeneous with Alzheimer disease as a common comorbidity.