Multiple colors by fluorescence in situ hybridization using ratio-labelled DNA probes create a molecular karyotype.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is now widely used for the localization of genomic DNA fragments, and the identification of chromosomes by painting. We now show that half of the chromosomal complement can be painted in twelve different colors by using human chromosome specific libraries carrying three distinct labels mixed in multiple ratios. The photographs are in 'real' color rather than 'colorized'. The painting technique described here can be used for the identification of small or complex chromosomal rearrangements and marker chromosomes in humans or in any other species for which well defined chromosome specific libraries exist in a laboratory equipped with a conventional fluorescence microscope. The versatility of this novel cytogenetic technology may well constitute an advancement comparable to the introduction of chromosome banding and high resolution analysis of chromosomes in prometaphase.     

Chromosomal aberrations in neuroblastoma cell lines identified by cross species color banding and chromosome painting

We have studied cytogenetic rearrangements in karyotypes of five neuroblastoma cell lines [SK-N-AS, SK-N-SH, SH-SY5Y, SK-N-MC, SMS-KCNR] by G-banding, cross species color banding (RxFISH), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome painting probes. Each neuroblastoma cell line had unique modal karyotypic characteristics and showed a variable number of numerical and structural clonal cytogenetic aberrations. The number of rearranged chromosomes in SK-N-AS, SK-N-SH, SH-SY5Y, SK-N-MC, and SMS-KCNR was 11, 3, 7, 14 (tetraploid, 20-21), and 6, respectively. The origins of abnormal chromosomes were effectively analyzed by RxFISH and FISH with multiple chromosome painting probes. The chromosomal origin of the homogeneously staining region in SH-SY5Y was identified as coamplification of chromosome bands 2p13 and 2p24 by chromosome microdissection and FISH. The non-random rearrangements of chromosomes were determined on 1p34 approximately p36, 6q16 approximately q21, 8q24, 9q34, 11q13 approximately q23, 16q23 approximately q24, 17q21, and 22q31. These results may provide useful information for further molecular characterization of neuroblastoma.     

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of the EBV-producing cell line B95-8 (Saguinus oedipus, Platyrrhini) by chromosome sorting and painting

The cell line B95-8 releases Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) with high titres of transforming activity and is widely used as a model in cancer research and virology. There are, however, controversial reports about the species of origin, cell line stability and karyotype. To address these questions, B95-8 chromosomes were analysed by chromosome sorting and painting by multicolour fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Reciprocal painting was performed between B95-8, ‘wildtype’ New World monkey and human chromosomes. Saguinus oedipus was revealed as the species of origin. A further five cell-line-specific marker chromosomes, resulting from translocations, deletions and an insertion were found. Although human chromosome 6 or 13 homologues were always involved in these rearrangements, co-hybridization of an EBV-specific DNA probe did not reveal site-specific hybridization to marker chromosomes or at translocation breakpoints. The multicolour probe set described here will be of special value for further evolutionary studies in New World monkeys. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Differentially painting human chromosome arms with combined binary ratio-labeling fluorescence in situ hybridization

Recently we developed a novel strategy for differentially painting all 24 human chromosomes. It is termed COBRA-FISH, short for combined binary ratio labeling-fluorescence in situ hybridization. COBRA-FISH is distinct from the pure combinatorial approach in that only 4 instead of 5 fluorophores are needed to achieve color discrimination of 24 targets. Furthermore, multiplicity can be increased to 48 by introduction of a fifth fluorophore. Here we show that color identification by COBRA-FISH of all of the p and q arms of human chromosomes is feasible, and we apply the technique for detecting and elucidating intra- and interchromosomal rearrangements. Compared with 24-color whole chromosome painting FISH, PQ-COBRA-FISH considerably enhances the ability to determine the composition of rearranged chromosomes as demonstrated by the identification of pericentric inversions and isochromosomes as well as the elucidation of the arm identity of chromosomal material involved in complex translocations that occur in solid tumors.     

Preferential involvement of the short arm in chromosome 8-derived supernumerary markers and ring as identified by chromosome arm painting

We report on the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with specific chromosome 8 arm painting to characterize further small supernumerary chromosome 8-derived markers/rings (SMC/SRC) identified in three patients. Two patients (patients 1 and 2) who carried the marker (SMC) were evaluated because of mental retardation and minor facial anomalies. The patient (patient 3) who carried the ring (SRC) had ventriculomegaly. Parental blood chromosomes of patients 2 and 3 were normal and unavailable on patient 1. The identification of the SMC/SRC was first characterized by FISH specific alpha-repeat centromeric probes, second by FISH whole chromosome painting (WCP), and finally by FISH chromosome arm painting (CAP). The latter showed involvement of only the short arm of chromosome 8 in all three SMC/SRC cases, suggesting a U-type exchange mechanism.     

A chromosome painting method for human sperm chromosomes using fluorescentin situ hybridization

Summary A method of chromosome painting on human sperm chromosomes using fluorescentin situ hybridization (FISH) is introduced. Sperm chromosome slides were prepared afterin vitro fertilization of hamster eggs with human spermatozoa. The slides were treated by RNase A before FISH. Chromosome 4 was clearly and specifically painted in a majority of sperm-derived metaphase plates after an application of whole chromosome painting DNA probes of this chromosome. This is the first report of successful painting on human sperm chromosomes.     

用染色体涂染技术分析五例染色体结构异常

目的 结合G－显带核型分析诊断染色体易位,并对G显带技术难以鉴定的微小易位进行分析。方法 采用生物素标记的显微切割备的X、Y、14q,10号染色体特异性探针,与患者外周血培养淋巴细胞中期染色体进行荧光原位杂交。结果 室温存放近10年的标本,－80℃冻存标本及新鲜标本均可看到清晰的杂交信号,染色体结构异常很清楚。结论 染色体涂染技术结合G显带核型分析,可以准确识别G显带技术难以鉴定的染色体微小易位。     

Identification of 14 rare marker chromosomes and derivatives by spectral karyotyping in prenatal and postnatal diagnosis

Extra structurally abnormal chromosomes (ESACs) and cryptic rearrangements are often associated with mental retardation and phenotypic abnormalities. In some cases their characterisation, using standard cytogenetic techniques and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), is difficult and time consuming, where a fast and accurate identification is essential, especially when such chromosomal aberrations are found in prenatal diagnosis. A recent molecular technique, spectral karyotyping (SKY), based on the spectral signature of 24 chromosome-specific painting probes labelled with different combinations of five fluorochromes, allows the simultaneous visualisation of all human chromosomes in different colours. We used SKY analysis on 14 cases with rare ESACs or cryptic unbalanced rearrangements found at pre- or postnatal diagnosis. SKY analysis permitted the classification of chromosome rearrangements in all 14 cases analysed in combination with FISH analysis.     

染色体涂染技术在恶性血液病研究中的应用

为探讨染色体荧光原位杂交（ＦＩＳＨ）技术在恶性血液病研究中的价值，应用生物素或异硫氰酸荧光素标记的整条染色体涂染探针，对Ｒ带核型分析揭示有难以识别的染色体结构畸变或标记染色体的１０例恶性血液病进行了ＦＩＳＨ检测。通过染色体涂染和核型分析资料的比较，识别了６例标记染色体的来源，确定了４例染色体易位的类型。结果表明：ＦＩＳＨ是一种有效而可靠的检测手段，它大大提高了常规细胞遗传学方法识别标记染色体和其它染色体结构畸变的能力，因而在恶性血液病的染色体研究中值得更多地采用这一新技术。     

Reciprocal chromosome painting between a New World primate, the woolly monkey, and humans

We employed fluorescence-activated chromosome sorting (FACS) to construct chromosome paint sets for the woolly monkey (Lagothrix lagotricha) and then FISH to reciprocally paint human and woolly monkey metaphases. Reciprocal chromosome painting between humans and the woolly monkey allowed us to assign subchromosomal homologies between these species. The reciprocal painting data between humans and the woolly monkey also allow a better interpretation of the chromosomal difference between humans and platyrrhines, and refine hypotheses about the genomic rearrangements that gave origin to the genome of New World monkeys. Paints of woolly monkey chromosomes were used to paint human metaphases and forty-five clear signals were detected. Paints specific to each human chromosome were used to paint woolly monkey metaphases. The 23 human paints gave 39 clear signals on the woolly monkey karyotype. The woolly monkey chromosomes painted by human paints produced 7 associations of segments homologous to human chromosomes or human chromosome segments: 2/16, 3/21, 4sol;15, 5/7, 8/18, 10/16 and 14/15. A derived translocation between segments homologous to human chromosomes 4 and 15 is a synapomorphic marker linking all Atelines. These species may also be linked by fragmentation of homologs to human 1, 4, and 15.     

Chromosome painting: a useful art

Chromosome 'painting' refers to the hybridization of fluorescently labeled chromosome-specific, composite probe pools to cytological preparations. Chromosome painting allows the visualization of individual chromosomes in metaphase or interphase cells and the identification of both numerical and structural chromosomal aberrations in human pathology with high sensitivity and specificity. In addition to human chromosome-specific probe pools, painting probes have become available for an increasing range of different species. They can be applied to cross-species comparisons as well as to the study of chromosomal rearrangements in animal models of human diseases. The simultaneous hybridization of multiple chromosome painting probes, each tagged with a specific fluorochrome or fluorochrome combination, has resulted in the differential color display of human (and mouse) chromosomes, i.e. color karyotyping. In this review, we will summarize recent developments of multicolor chromosome painting, describe applications in basic chromosome research and cytogenetic diagnostics, and discuss limitations and future directions.      

Preferential involvement of the short arm in chromosome 8‐derived supernumerary markers and ring as identified by chromosome arm painting

We report on the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with specific chromosome 8 arm painting to characterize further small supernumerary chromosome 8‐derived markers/rings (SMC/SRC) identified in three patients. Two patients (patients 1 and 2) who carried the marker (SMC) were evaluated because of mental retardation and minor facial anomalies. The patient (patient 3) who carried the ring (SRC) had ventriculomegaly. Parental blood chromosomes of patients 2 and 3 were normal and unavailable on patient 1. The identification of the SMC/SRC was first characterized by FISH specific alpha‐repeat centromeric probes, second by FISH whole chromosome painting (WCP), and finally by FISH chromosome arm painting (CAP). The latter showed involvement of only the short arm of chromosome 8 in all three SMC/SRC cases, suggesting a U‐type exchange mechanism. Am. J. Med. Genet. 90:276–282, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

An Easy and Reliable Procedure of Microdissection Technique for the Analysis of Chromosomal Breakpoints and Marker Chromosomes

Microdissection in combination with reverse painting fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) is a very effective method to identify breakpoints and rearrangements of derived chromosomes and reveal the chromosomal origin of marker chromosomes. We describe an innovation that allows a convenient, fast and safe isolation of microdissected fragments as currently available protocols. The microdissected chromosomes are harvested in a collection drop located in a movable micropipette adjusted to a second micromanipulator under microscopic observation. We used this technique to analyze several cytogenetic aberrations. In order to evaluate the efficiency of our microdissection procedure, we compared the results obtained with microdissection probes made from only one fragment with those obtained with more than six microdissected fragments. In all cases, the single- fragment microdissections were sufficient to provide probes.     

Marker chromosome identification by micro-FISH

Micro-FISH was used to elucidate the chromosomal origin of marker chromosomes in three patients. Ten copies of marker chromosomes were collected with microneedles from GTG banded metaphases, transferred to a collecting drop and amplified by means of DOP-PCR. The PCR products were labeled with biotin-14-dATP and used as FISH probes for hybridization to normal metaphase chromosomes and to metaphase chromosomes of the patients (reverse painting). With the generation of chromosome region-specific painting probes by PCR amplification of microdissected DNA and subsequent FISH it was possible to identify the marker chromosomes in all patients. One marker appeared to be derived from the centromere region of the X-chromosome and the proximal third of the long arm, one from the centromere region of chromosome 17 and one marker chromosome was identified as an isochromosome 18p.     

Chromosome painting as a supplement to cytogenetic banding analysis in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

Chromosomal in situ suppression (CISS) hybridization with biotin labeled chromosome-specific libraries was performed on short-term cultures from five cases of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The painting analysis proceeded in three stages. First-stage CISS hybridization was done with libraries specific for chromosomes that seemed to be lost or rearranged as judged by banding analysis. Second-stage CISS included hybridization with probes specific for chromosomes that, because of banding pattern similarities, were considered to be likely candidates to have contributed unidentified chromatin blocks in the abnormal karyotype. The third and final stage was a confirmation hybridization with a library specific for the chromosome that, at the stage two analysis, was found to have donated the previously unknown chromosomal segment. The aberrant chromosomes were often more complex than the banding analysis had led us to believe. Among the rearrangements whose nature was determined by CISS hybridization were two add(1)(p36) which, in both cases, were shown to be a der(1)t(1;2)(p36;q31). This study illustrates the potential use of chromosome painting in resolving karyotypic uncertainties in NHL, and it shows that new cytogenetic subgroups may emerge when classical banding analysis is supplemented with fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

High chromosome conservation detected by comparative chromosome painting in chicken, pigeon and passerine birds

Chicken chromosome paints for macrochromosomes 1-10, Z, and the nine largest microchromosomes (Griffin et al. 1999) were used to analyze chromosome homologies between chicken (Gallus gallus domesticus: Galliformes), domestic pigeon (Columba livia: Columbiformes), chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs Passeriformes), and redwing (Turdus iliacus: Passeriformes). High conservation of syntenies was revealed. In general, both macro- and microchromosomes in these birds showed very low levels of interchromosomal rearrangements. Only two cases of rearrangements were found. Chicken chromosome 1 corresponds to chromosome 1 in pigeon, but to chromosomes 3 and 4 in chaffinch and chromosomes 2 and 5 in redwing. Chicken chromosome 4 was shown to be homologous to two pairs of chromosomes in the karyotypes of pigeon and both passerine species. Comparative analysis of chromosome painting data and the results of FISH with (TTAGGG)n probe did not reveal any correlation between the distribution of interstitial telomere sites (ITSs) and chromosome rearrangements in pigeon, chaffinch and redwing. In chaffinch, ITSs were found to co-localize with a tandem repeat GS (Liangouzov et al. 2002), monomers of which contain an internal TTAGGG motif.     

Comparative genomic hybridization-aided unraveling of complex karyotypes in human hematopoietic neoplasias

The information obtained by conventional cytogenetics (CC) in human leukemias is sometimes limited, in particular by complex karyotypes with many marker chromosomes. While CC is restricted to metaphases with a good quality, interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I-FISH) is also capable of analyzing specific anomalies in the interphase nuclei. Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) gives additional information about the imbalanced karyotype changes in the whole genome. The aim of this study was to assess the contribution of CGH to the unraveling of complex GTG karyotypes, which are difficult to evaluate by banding analysis, and to compare these results with those by CC and FISH. Thirteen bone marrow samples and one sample obtained from peripheral blood of 13 leukemia patients were examined by CC, FISH and CGH. The GTG banding analysis showed complex karyotypes with many marker chromosomes. The most frequent abnormalities were numerical and structural aberrations on chromosomes 5 and 7. In 12 of the 14 samples, the CGH analysis was able to detect chromosomal imbalances with losses of material on chromosome 5 and 7 as the most frequent aberrations. In all 14 samples, additional FISH analyses were performed. For most of the studied neoplasias, a close correlation between CC, FISH and CGH data was observed. CGH was considerably helpful in adding additional information to classical karyotyping, if the low quality or number of metaphases was insufficient for a reliable CC analysis. Even in cases where whole chromosome painting could be applied, it added information on the breakpoints of the observed rearrangements. In only 2 of the studied 14 samples, neither CGH nor I-FISH could improve the result of karyotyping. CGH, nevertheless, can be regarded as a powerful additional technique in leukemias with unsuccessful CC, incomplete, or complex karyotypes with many marker chromosomes. A systematic analysis by three techniques such as CC, FISH and CGH guarantees an optimal genetic characterization of the neoplasias.     

Cytogenetic study of a patient with infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia using GTG-banding and chromosome painting

Numerical and structural chromosomal abnormalities occur in up to 90% of cases of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Two-thirds of these abnormalities are recurrent. The most common abnormalities are pseudodiploidy and t(1;19), occurring 40 and 5-6% of the time. Hyperdiploidy has the best prognosis, with an 80-90% 5-year survival. The 4;11 translocation has the worst prognosis, with a 10-35% 5-year survival. We report a patient with infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia and nonrecurrent rearrangements of chromosomes 10 and 11. Structural rearrangements between chromosomes 10 and 11 have been observed in 0.5% of all cases of childhood ALL with cytogenetic abnormalities. The identification of the apparently unique structural abnormalities was achieved using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome 10- and chromosome 11-specific painting probes as an adjunct to conventional cytogenetics. As is often the case, suboptimal preparations often preclude unequivocal identification of complex rearrangements by conventional banding techniques. The cytogenetic diagnosis of our patient was established as 46,XY, der(10)-t(10;11)(p15;q14)t(10;11)(q25;p11), der(11)t(10;11)(p15;q14)t(10;11)-(q25;p11). The benefits of FISH serve to increase the resolution of detection for chromosomal abnormalities and the understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of childhood ALL.     

Molecular and fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of a 10;11 rearrangement in a case of infant acute monocytic leukemia

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis in a case of infant acute monocytic leukemia M5 revealed a complex rearrangement between chromosomes 10 and 11, leading to the disruption of the MLL gene. Using two painting probes for chromosomes 10 and 11 and a specific probe for the MLL gene localized on 11q23, we observed a paracentric inversion of the 11q13-q23 fragment translocated to 10p12. Molecular analysis showed that AF10 localized on 10p12 was the fusion partner gene of MLL in this rearrangement (10;11). This report underlined the usefulness of FISH and molecular techniques in identifying complex rearrangements.     

Diagnosis of four chromosome abnormalities of unknown origin by chromosome microdissection and subsequent reverse and forward painting

A molecular cytogenetic method consisting of chromosome microdissection and subsequent reverse/forward chromosome painting is a powerful tool to identify chromosome abnormalities of unknown origin. We present 4 cases of chromosome structural abnormalities whose origins were ascertained by this method. In one MCA/MR patient with an add(5q)chromosome, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), using probes generated from a microdissected additional segment of the add(5q) chromosome and then from a distal region of normal chromosome 5, confirmed that the patient had a tandem duplication for a 5q35-qter segment. Similarly, we ascertained that an additional segment of an add(3p) chromosome in another MCA/MR patient had been derived from a 7q32-qter segment. In a woman with a history of successive spontaneous abortions and with a minute marker chromosome, painting using microdissected probes from the whole marker chromosome revealed that it was i(15)(p10) or psu dic(15;15)(q11;q11). Likewise, a marker observed in a fetus was a ring chromosome derived from the paracentromeric region of chromosome 19. We emphasize the value of the microdissection-based chromosome painting method in the identification of unknown chromosomes, especially for marker chromosomes. The method may contribute to a collection of data among patients with similar or identical chromosome abnormalities, which may lead to a better clinical syndrome delineation. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.