How nurse practitioners make decisions regarding coronary heart disease risk: a social judgment analysis

PURPOSE: Understanding how nurse practitioners use clinical decision skills in practice has the potential to guide education programs to ensure safe, competent, and high quality advanced nursing practice. This study used the lens of social judgment theory to examine the clinical decision making of 60 nurse practitioners. METHODS: A three‐group pretest–posttest comparison design was used to evaluate how much insight nurse practitioners had into their clinical decision‐making process. FINDINGS: Nurse practitioners had modest insight into their clinical decision‐making process. CONCLUSION: Self‐insight has implications for enhancing nurses' decision making, improving education, and fostering agreement among advanced practice nurses. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Self‐insight has implications for developing professional decision making and promoting appropriate educational opportunities for advanced practice nurses.     

The application of decision making concepts by nurse practitioners in general practice

The application of decision making concepts by nurse practitioners in general practice ¶This paper is concerned with the conceptual frameworks which could be applied to nurse practitioners in general practice in reaching decisions during patient consultations. Four strategies of decision making are explained within a practice context: hypothetico-deductive method, decision analysis, pattern recognition and intuition. The study uses retrospective verbalization and observation of 20 nurse practitioners working alongside general practitioners to explore decision making issues. The results of the study show that important factors relating to decision making include: the ability to recognize patterns in clinical situations to fit with patterns previously seen; an appreciation of the consequences of inappropriate action; and the ability to concentrate simultaneously on complex and sometimes masked patient cues as well as multiple treatment options.     

The Acute Care Nurse Practitioner in Collaborative Practice

Nurse-physician relationships remain, for the most part, hierarchical in nature. A hierarchical structure allows the person at the top, most notably the physician, the highest level of authority and power for decision making. Other health care providers are delegated various tasks related to the medical plan of care. One role of nonmedical health care providers, including nurses, is to support the medical plan of care and increase the productivity of physicians. Medical centers have house staff, usually interns and residents, who work collaboratively with the attending physicians in care delivery. At one medical center, a shortage of medical house staff for internal medicine prompted the development and evaluation of an alternative service. The alternative service utilized master prepared, certified nurse practitioners on a nonteaching service to provide care for selected types of medical patients. Physicians consulted with nurse practitioners, but retained decision-making authority concerning patient admission to the service. This paper describes the development and evaluation of an alternative service based on a collaborative practice model and the role of nurse practitioners working under such a model. Discussion includes suggestions for process guideline development for organizations that want to improve collaborative practice relationships between unit nursing staff, nurse practitioners, and physicians.     

Health Problems Encountered by Nurse Practitioners and Physicians in General Medicine Clinics

Distribution of health problems encountered by nurse practitioners and physicians in general/adult medicine clinics was studied. Proportional samples by clinics were selected from a total of 13,039 patient visits made to four clinics during an 18-week period in 1978. A Patient Encounter Form was used as the instrument and the ICD-9-CM as the coding system. Results showed that (a) 25.1% of the 13,039 patient visits were made to the nurse practitioners and 74.9% to the physicians, (b) 23 frequently reported health problems constituted more than 50% of all health problems seen by both provider groups, and (c) health problems with V codes constituted less than 30% of all health problems seen by both provider groups. Many similarities in health problems seen by nurse practitioners and physicians may indicate that nurse practitioners in the general/adult medicine specialty are used more to substitute for physicians in managing selected health problems than to complement medical practice.     

Two explanations of nurse practitioner interactions and participatory decision making with physicians

The purpose of this study was to test a theoretical model that integrated two explanations of nurse practitioner interaction and participatory decision making with physicians. The two explanations were derived from technology theory and social exchange theory. Nurse practitioners (N = 38) responded to a four-scale magnitude estimation instrument measuring each of four concepts in the model: complexity, expected benefit-cost ratio of interaction, interaction, and participatory decision making. Predictions derived from both theories were supported. Nurse practitioner decisions about interaction with physicians were influenced by the dynamics of social exchange with physicians, as well as the technological requirements of primary care. The findings offer nurse practitioners new strategies for managing professional exchanges on behalf of their patients.     

The clinical trial as a means for organizational change: report of a case study.

An attempt was made to introduce an innovation (nurse practitioners) into an organization (an outpatient clinic) using the format of a clinical trial. Staff physicians evaluated patients as to their acceptability for care by nurse practitioners before and after a 12-month trial. "Acceptable" patients were randomly assigned to control (regular clinic) and experimental groups (nurse practitioner care). There was a statistically significant increase (p less than 0.001) in physicians' willingness to delegate patients to nurse practitioners for care after the trial. Initial assessments of "acceptable" were highly associated with demographic variables such as age, race, and level of education. Patients' medical status, rather than personal characteristics, were found to be associated with decision making on re-evaluation. Positions were created for nurse practitioners on the staff of the clinic at the end of the experiment.     

Components Necessary in a Successful Nurse Practitioner-Physician Collaborative Practice

In recent years, collaborative practice has gained much attention from nurse practitioners in primary health care settings. This is because many nurse practitioners feel that nurse practitioners and physicians can complement each other's roles. Together, they can provide more comprehensive, quality primary health care than either profession can provide by itself. Nurse practitioners and physicians working together to care for a common group of patients may have varying degrees of collaboration in their practice. This article discusses some elements and components necessary to maximize the quality and extent of collaboration.     

Nurses' and physicians' performance on clinical simulation test: hypertension.

The purposes of this study were to determine whether nurse practitioners with a master's degree (NPM), nurse practitioners with a certificate (NPC), and public health nurses (PHN) perform as proficiently as family practice physicians (FPP) in assessing and managing essential hypertension and whether the four groups use a psychosocial or pathophysiological model in providing care. Subjects included 30 FPPs, 30 NPMs, 33 NPCs, and 40 PHNs. A clinical simulation test required subjects to collect data, identify problems, interpret tests, and formulate care plans. Criterion test performance was established by eight expert nurses and physicians. Physicians and nurse practitioners were equally proficient, and public health nurses were significantly less proficient on only 3 of 11 test sections. Sharpest contrasts were in test interpretation, with FPPs clearly more expert. FPPs practice style was less psychosocial but not more pathophysiological than that of the nurse practitioners. The study suggests that, except for nurses greater use of a psychosocial model, expanded role nurses and physicians perform similarly in assessing and managing hypertension and that, with slightly more training, PHNs could perform comparably.     

Collaborative practice: a critical theory perspective

The purpose of this critical theory study was to investigate the observed failure of nurses and physicians to collaborate, and the underlying meaning behind this failure. Using a phenomenological and participatory approach, 18 family nurse practitioners and physicians in joint practice were interviewed separately and together about their practice relationships. Transcribed interviews and data summaries were returned to the participants for review and validation. Emergent themes were analyzed using the critical theory of Jürgen Habermas. Results demonstrated that distorted communication and nonmeaningful interactions were promoted by both nurses and physicians. Elements identified as contributing to more successful collaborative practices included a willingness to move beyond basic information exchange in nurse/physician interactions, the willingness and ability to challenge distortions and assumptions in the relationship, and a belief system based on critical self-reflection.     

Who is a nurse practitioner? Processes of care and patients' and physicians' perceptions.

During a repeat of a previous study of nurse practitioners conducted at the University of Kansas, an opportunity occurred to examine the impact of two different styles of care provided by nurse practitioners on patients and physicians with whom they worked. The two nurse practitioners involved had similar backgrounds in terms of work experience. The participated in the same training program for nurse practitioners, practice in the same environment, and cared for patients randomly allocated to one or the other practitioner. One practitioner saw her patients more often and for longer periods of time, ordered more medications, and less often sought physician consultation. She also was most optimistic regarding the impact of her services on patients' conditions. The other was more dependent upon physicians for validation of her actions. Physicians did not distinguish between the two practitioners in terms of their performance. However, patients cared for by the practitioner whose behavior suggested an integration of medical and nursing care processes saw nurses as a more common source of information about illness and demonstrated more significant shifts in preferences for services provided by nurses rather than physicians. No significant changes were noted from pretest values among patients cared for by the other nurse practitioner.     

Changes in intensive care unit nurse involvement in end of life decision making between 1999 and 2016: Descriptive comparative study

ObjectiveComparison of nurse involvement in end of life decision making in European countries participating in ETHICUS I- 1999 and ETHICUS II- 2015.MethodologyThis was a prospective observational study of 22 European ICUs included in the ETHICUS-II and I. Data were collected as per the ETHICUS-I and ETHICUS-II protocols. Four questions within the ETHICUS protocols related to nurse involvement in end of life decision making were analyzed. This is a comparison of changes in nurse involvement in end of life decisions from 1999 to 2015.SettingInternational e-based questionnaire completed by an intensive care clinician when an end of life decision was performed on any patient.SubjectsIntensive care physicians and nurses, no interventions were performed.MeasurementsA 20 question survey was used to describe the decision making process, on what basis was the decision made, who was involved in the decision making process, and what precise decisions were made.ResultsA total of 4592 cases from 22 centres are included. While there was more agreement between nurses and physicians in ETHICUS-I compared to ETHICUS-I, fewer discussions with nurses occurred in ETHICUS-II. The frequency of end of life decisions that were discussed with nurses decreased in all three regions between ETHICUS-I and ETHICUS-II.ConclusionBased on the results of the current study, nurses should be further encouraged to increase their involvement in end of life decision-making, especially those in southern Europe.     

Using cost-analysis techniques to measure the value of nurse practitioner care

Nurse practitioners are in a unique position to deliver high-quality care to a variety of populations and are being utilized in many countries worldwide. Although certain aspects of the nurse practitioner role may differ from country to country, limited financial support and competition for access to patients make it incumbent on nurse practitioners to document the cost-effectiveness of their care. Cost analysis, a business tool that can be used by any practitioner in any health care system, was used to examine business practices of an academic-based nurse-managed centre. In order for this tool to be effective, nurse practitioners must become comfortable with using cost-analysis techniques in their practices. Linking outcome data with cost data was found to be one method for explicating the value of nurse practitioner practice. Nurse practitioners must also recognize that they are competing with primary-care physician practices and other primary health-care practices. It is vital for nurse practitioners to document both the quality and the costs of their care in order to compete with physicians and other health care providers, in order to influence policy and other health-care decision makers.     

Emergency Physicians' Attitudes Toward the Emergency Nurse Practitioner Role: Validation Versus Rejection

A qualitative grounded theory approach was used in this study, which examined the attitudes of a group of emergency physicians toward collaborative practice with emergency nurse practitioners. Interviews were conducted with five physicians who were not currently working with nurse practitioners. Responses were coded, and a substantive theory model of dependent collaboration emerged. The physicians supported the emergency nurse practitioner role on the grounds that it be supervised in the traditional fashion by the physician. Concerns regarding education, trust, liability, and capability were identified. Deficits in knowledge regarding training and the role/function of nurse practitioners were also identified.     

Comparing HMO physicians' attitudes towards NPs and PAs

This study examined the attitudes of physicians working in health maintenance organizations toward the use of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. It also explored some of the underlying reasons for these attitudes: effect upon quality of care, risk of malpractice, role threat and gender bias. The setting was a health maintenance organization serving 270,000 members. The data were derived from a survey of physicians' attitudes and behavior. Physicians from internal medicine, pediatrics and obstetrics-gynecology were the study population. Internists and pediatricians had favorable attitudes toward both nurse practitioners and physician assistants. Obstetrician-gynecologists had somewhat less favorable attitudes. Physicians in all three specialties favored nurse practitioners more than physician assistants. Physicians felt that nurse practitioners were more likely to increase the quality of care and less likely to increase the risk of malpractice. Nurse practitioners were not seen as a greater role threat. Some gender bias appeared to be present, but it did not appear to constrain the use of nurse practitioners. Large, multi-specialty, prepaid group practice health maintenance organizations may be favorable settings for nurse practitioners and physician assistants to practice primary care.     

Family physician/nurse practitioner: stories of collaboration

AIMS: This paper presents the experiences of nurse practitioners and family physicians working in collaborative practice at four Canadian rural primary care agencies. It focuses on the qualitative segment of a larger study examining the impact of an educational intervention on interprofessional practice. BACKGROUND: Growing awareness of the importance of health promotion and disease prevention, the increased complexity of community-based care, and the need to use scarce human healthcare resources, especially family physicians, far more efficiently and effectively, have resulted in increased emphasis on primary healthcare renewal in Canada. Key to primary healthcare renewal is care delivery through interdisciplinary teams that include nurse practitioners. METHODS: Narrative analysis, a form of interpretive analysis that respects the integrity of the stories told by participants, was chosen as the strategy to examine the narrative data gathered in two sets of interviews with the nurse practitioners and family physicians. The study was undertaken during 2000. RESULTS: Thirteen family physicians and five nurse practitioners with diverse educational backgrounds and varied experience with collaboration participated in the qualitative component of the study. A number of issues related to working in a shared practice were identified in nurse practitioner and family physician interviews across the research sites. The themes identified in participants' stories included issues related to the scope of practice, emphasizing the importance of role clarity and trust, the ideological difference regarding disease prevention and health promotion, differences in perceptions about the operation of collaborative practice, and the understanding that collaborative relationships evolve. CONCLUSIONS: The placement of nurse practitioners and family physicians in a common clinical practice without some form of orientation process does not produce collaborative practice. Educational strategies related to role expectations are necessary to facilitate the development of care delivery partnerships characterized by interdependent practice.     

Northern Taiwan nurse practitioners' perceptions of their roles

The purpose of this qualitative research was to explore northern Taiwan nurse practitioners' perceptions of their roles. Eight nurse practitioners participated in this research, which used purposive sampling. Data were collected by in-depth audio-taped interviews, and analysed by qualitative content analysis. For qualitative research, data analysis and data collection go hand in hand. Four themes were evolved from data analysis, which were roles dilemma, roles daybreak, roles function and roles requirement. According to findings, nurse practitioners confront roles dilemma in both intra-professional and inter-professional conflicts and risk of illegal practice. However, nurse practitioners find daybreak from clinical effectiveness, positive role recognition and the progress of related regulations. They conceive their role capability as that of medical subordinate, coach, counselor, and coordinator. They emphasize important requirements for being a nurse practitioner, such as a Bachelor's degree, 5 years medical-surgical practice experience, achieving level 3 on the nursing clinical ladder and possessing an ACLS license. The above research findings might be used to support decision making for NP policy in the future.     

Clinical Decision Making of Staff Nurses

A qualitative analysis of the satisfaction of nurses with clinical decision making, the nature of the decision making, nurses' involvement in the process and factors that influence decision-making behavior is presented. The data were obtained from interviews conducted with physicians and nurses as a part of a study of nurse turnover and vacancy in hospitals. Staff nurse involvement in decision making is described as being interdependent; nurses reported general satisfaction with their involvement, while physicians generally resisted the decision-making discretion of nurses. Nurses on specialized and critical care units were more satisfied than were nurses who worked on general medical-surgical units. Trust and control were central issues. Implications for considering what knowledge, skill and decisional authority are needed for patient care are discussed.     

Counseling medical patients about cigarette smoking: a comparison of the impact of training on nurse practitioners and physicians

Health providers believe that eliminating smoking is an important health promotion goal, but physicians and nurse practitioners may differ in the implementation of that belief. To determine whether nurse practitioners or physicians were more likely to counsel smokers to quit smoking, 12 internal medicine nurse practitioners (100 percent female) and 40 internal medicine physicians (30 percent female) were studied at four San Francisco Bay-area Kaiser Permanente Medical Centers, both before and after training in smoking-cessation counseling. In addition, exit phone surveys of at least 15 smokers per participant were completed as soon as possible following an office visit to the participant (269 nurse practitioner patients; 948 physician patients). It was found that nurse practitioners discussed smoking with patients more often than did physicians (64 percent vs. 50 percent; p less than 0.001), asked patients more often whether they were interested in quitting (49 percent vs. 40 percent; p less than 0.01), distributed more smoking-cessation literature to patients (37 percent vs. 25 percent; p less than 0.001) and made more follow-up appointments about smoking (36 percent vs. 19 percent; p less than 0.001). These differences in counseling behavior between the two groups were not explained by differences in patient characteristics of the two groups. The authors concluded that, given the same training, nurse practitioners are more likely to counsel smokers about quitting than are physicians.