Comparison of cold lateral compaction and continuous wave of obturation techniques following manual or rotary instrumentation

AIM: To compare different combinations of root canal preparation and obturation technique. METHODOLOGY: A total of 48 freshly extracted human maxillary central incisors were divided into two identical groups on the basis of root canal length and apical diameter. The root canals were prepared by manual crown-down pressureless technique or with a rotary system (ProFile; Dentsply Maillefer, Ballaigues, Switzerland) in a crown-down technique. The coronal diameter and apical size of the root canals were standardized in both preparation techniques. Each main group was then divided into two subgroups and obturated with either cold lateral compaction or continuous wave of obturation with System B (EIE-Analytic Technology, Orange, CA, USA). The distribution of filling material in each canal was assessed by stereomicroscopic examination of eight cross-sections on each tooth. Areas of sealer, gutta-percha and voids were measured on the digital images of a total of 384 samples. Manipulation time and apical extrusion for each group was also determined. Data were statistically analysed using Kruskal-Wallis, anova (Bonferroni/Dunn) or Student's t-test. RESULTS: The percentage of sealer, gutta-percha and voids area between the obturation techniques was not significantly different (P > 0.05). Continuous wave groups had significantly more apical extrusion of sealer (P < 0.05), while none of the obturation techniques had gutta-percha extrusion. Rotary instrumentation was significantly faster than the manual technique (P < 0.05); continuous wave obturation was significantly faster than lateral compaction (P < 0.05). Total manipulation time in the rotary/continuous wave group was significantly shorter than the other groups (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The distribution of filling materials was similar in all combinations of instrumentation and obturation techniques. The continuous wave technique was faster than lateral compaction and it extruded more sealer.     

Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different devices for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of five different devices and techniques to remove gutta-percha root canal fillings. One hundred and twenty extracted single-rooted anterior and premolar teeth were enlarged to ISO size 35 and obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha using AH 26 as the sealer. Removal of gutta-percha was performed with the following devices and techniques: (a) Gates–Glidden and Hedstrom files, (b) only Hedstrom files, (c) Hedstrom files and chloroform, (d) the Endotec and Hedstrom files, and (e) the XGP drill and Hedstrom files. The following data were recorded: time taken to reach the desired working length, time required for the removal of the gutta-percha, and the amount of material extruded apically. The teeth were split longitudinally and photographed. Cleanliness of the root canal walls was scored using the projected slides with a total magnification of approximately 70 X. The fastest technique to reach the working length was using the XGP drill (e), followed by the Gates–Glidden drills (a), Hedstrom files and chloroform (c), and the Endotec device (d).The use of Hedstrom files (b) without any additional support proved to be most time-consuming. Differences were Statistically significant (U-test, P > 0.05) between the rotary devices and the manual techniques. Time for complete removal of gutta-percha was again shortest with the XGP drills (e), followed by the Gates-Glidden burs (a), the Endotec device (d), Hedstrom files with chloroform (c), and Hedstrom files alone (b). The XGP burs and the Gates-Glidden drills worked significantly faster than the other techniques. The amount of debris and filling material extruded apically in most cases did not exceed 0.1 mg. No significant differences could be detected between the groups (U-test, P > 0.05). Root canal cleanliness proved best following the use of Hedstrom files without additional support (b) and the Gates-Glidden drills (a), followed by Hedstrom files in combination with chloroform (c), the XGP-gutta-percha remover (e), and the Endotec device (d). When using the XGP two instrument fractures occurred in the apical parts of the root canals preventing further instrumentation to the apical foramen. When using the Gates-Glidden burs four instrument fractures occurred, but all fragments could be removed with forceps immediately. The results suggest that the XGP gutta-percha remover and the Gates-Glidden drills are efficient and time saving devices to remove gutta-percha but include a certain risk of instrument breakage and may leave some filling material inside the root canal. The best root canal cleanliness was achieved with Hedstrom files alone which, on the other hand, were shown to be the most time-consuming.     

Evaluation of single root canals filled using the lateral compaction, tagger's hybrid, microseal and guttaflow techniques

The aim of this study was to determine the percentage of voids, gutta-percha and root canal sealer using 4 different filling techniques. Fifty-two extracted maxillary lateral incisors were prepared using the crown-down pressureless technique. The teeth were randomly divided in 4 groups (n=13): Lateral compaction (LC), Tagger's hybrid (TH), MicroSeal (MS) and GuttaFlow (GF) techniques. Horizontal cross-sections were made at the 2, 10 and 15 mm levels from the apex. Digital images of the root canal areas were acquired using a stereomicroscope and examined using the Image Tool 3.0 software. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (α=0.05). In general, a significant decrease in the gutta-percha filled area and increase of sealer area were observed at the apical level for all the evaluated techniques (p<0.05). With regard to the presence of voids, no significant difference was found. MS and TH techniques showed a larger gutta-percha filled area than LC and GF techniques at the coronal and middle third level (p<0.05). From the results of the present study, it may be concluded that the gutta-percha filled area of fillings decrease at the apical level, regardless of the filling technique used.     

In vitro evaluation of four methods of sealer placement.

Sealer is required during root canal obturation, although no studies have shown which method of sealer placement provides the best coverage. This study evaluated and compared four methods of sealer placement: file, lentulo spiral, ultrasonic files, and master gutta-percha cone. Forty mandibular incisors were prepared by a step-back technique. AH26 (0.04 ml) was applied to the placement device, the sealer was placed in the canal, and the canal was obturated with lateral condensation of gutta-percha. The specimens were cleared and evaluated for the presence of the sealer in the apical, middle, and coronal thirds of the canal. The results showed no statistically significant differences among the four groups. The greatest variation in sealer coverage was found in the apical level. Sealer coverage in the coronal and middle thirds was nearly identical regardless of sealer placement technique.     

Ex vivo study of the efficacy of H-files and rotary Ni-Ti instruments to remove gutta-percha and four types of sealer

AIM: To compare the efficacy of ProFile rotary Nickel-Titanium (Ni-Ti) instruments and Hedstroem-files (H-files) combined with Gates-Glidden (GG) drills during removal of gutta-percha root fillings used in combination with one of the four representative sealers. METHODOLOGY: Forty-eight single-rooted human teeth, with fully formed apices and straight root canals were used. The root canals were accessed and instrumented using a stepback technique with H-files. They were randomly assigned to four groups and subsequently filled with a combination of lateral and vertical condensation of gutta-percha and one of the following sealers: Roth 811, AH26, Endion and Roekoseal. The root fillings were removed 1 year later, using either H-files in combination with GG drills or the ProFile Ni-Ti system. Teeth were then grooved longitudinally and split. The amount of gutta-percha and sealer remaining on the root canal walls was traced and scored visually with the aid of a stereomicroscope. The scores were analysed and statistically compared with the Kruskal-Wallis test between the ProFile and H-file groups, as well as among the four sealer subgroups. Two samples from each group were studied under the scanning electron microscope to enhance inspection of canal walls and remaining material. RESULTS: Sealer remnants were observed with both techniques mainly in the middle and apical third of the root canal. The ProFile system and the H-files were associated with similar amounts of remaining filling material (P > 0.05). In the cervical third of the root canal all sealer remnants were removed with both techniques. In the middle and apical third AH26 was associated with a statistically significant greater quantity of remnants on the root canal walls with both removal techniques (P < 0.05). Endion, Roth 811 and Roekoseal were associated with approximately the same amount of filling material in the middle third of the root canal (P > 0.05), whereas in the apical third Endion was associated with significantly more remnants of filling material than the other two sealers with either ProFile or H-files (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: None of the methods used for the removal of root fillings was totally effective, especially in the apical third of the root canal.     

Sealing ability of Thermafil with and without sealer.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the apical sealing ability of root canals filled using three obturating techniques. Sixteen maxillary first molars were obturated with Thermafil, 16 with Thermafil and a ZOE sealer, and 16 with laterally condensed gutta-percha. Two canal instrumentation methods were used, conventional step-back preparation with K-Flex files and traditional instrumentation combining reaming with reamers and filing with K-Flex files. Following obturation, the teeth were prepared for evaluation of the seal using India ink and a Profile Projector. The depth of penetration of the dye was statistically evaluated for each of the three roots with an analysis of variance. For sealing ability, there was no significant difference at the p < 0.05 level between the conventional step-back preparation and the traditional instrumentation technique. However, a significant difference was present at the p < 0.05 level for the obturation techniques. The mean linear dye penetration for the Thermafil technique was greater than that for lateral condensation.     

Apical dye penetration with four root canal sealers and gutta-percha using longitudinal sectioning.

The purpose of this study was to compare the level of apical dye penetration when different sealers were used with lateral condensation of gutta-percha. Fifty teeth with single root canals were biomechanically prepared using the step-back technique and irrigation with 15% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid with cetrimide and 1% NaOCl solutions. The teeth were divided into five groups of 10 teeth each. The control group root canals were filled with laterally condensed gutta-percha without sealer and the other four groups were filled with laterally condensed gutta-percha and either Apexit, Sealapex, Tubli-Seal, or AH-26 sealer. After storage in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for 48 h, the root surfaces were coated with nail varnish (except at the apex), placed in 2% methylene blue dye solution, and centrifuged at 30 x g for 3 min. The roots were sectioned longitudinally to determine the following mean levels of dye penetration: AH-26, 0.48 mm; Apexit, 1.33 mm; Sealapex, 4.59 mm; Tubli-Seal, 5.58 mm; and gutta-percha alone, 7.99 mm. This study demonstrated that a root canal sealer should be used in conjunction with laterally condensed gutta-percha and that AH-26 sealer had significantly less dye penetration than the other three sealers while Apexit had significantly less dye penetration than Sealapex and Tubli-Seal. There was no significant difference between Sealapex and Tubli-Seal.     

A case of unusual anatomy: a mandibular second premolar with four canals

AIM: The aim of this case report is to describe conventional root canal treatment on a mandibular second premolar with four canals. SUMMARY: The pulp of a mandibular second premolar had become irreversibly inflamed, probably as a result of bacterial microleakage from a carious lesion. The general dental practitioner had initiated root canal treatment, but due to procedural difficulties referred the case. Conventional root canal treatment was then performed with magnification. Preparation was undertaken in a crown-down manner using balanced force hand instrumentation with flexible K-type files and files of Greater Taper. The root canals were obturated with vertically condensed gutta-percha technique. KEY LEARNING POINTS: Good illumination and magnification are vital during root canal treatment. Crown-down preparation using the balanced force technique with flexible files makes instrumentation easier and prevents many of the procedural errors that can occur with filing techniques. Greater Taper instruments made of nickel-titanium are sufficiently flexible to be used in complex curved canals and obviate the need for step-back flaring of the apical preparation. Vertical compaction of warm gutta-percha may simplify the obturation of complex root canal systems. When the technical difficulty of a procedure exceeds the expertise of the practitioner, specialist referral may be required.     

The sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer used with five gutta-percha obturation techniques

Abstract – The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the apical sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer (AH-26) when used with different gutta-percha obturation techniques (i.e. cold lateral condensation, warm vertical condensation, hybrid condensation) and with Thermafil and Soft-Core obturators. Straight single-rooted teeth with mature apices were prepared according to the crown-down/step-back technique and divided in five groups of 45 teeth and one group of 12 control teeth. After root canal filling 15 teeth of each group were kept for 1 day, another 15 teeth for 1 week, and another 15 teeth for 4 months at 37 °C in vacutainers in 80% relative humidity. The 237 teeth were immersed in india ink for 90 hours, each root was split and sectioned longitudinally, and the maximum extent of leakage was measured using a stereomicroscope at ×6 magnification. It became clear that leakage occurred whatever technique was combined with AH26 and that leakage increased with time. The amount of apical leakage and the number of leaking teeth in the Soft-Core obturator groups was significantly higher than all other 4 gutta-percha obturation techniques combined with AH26. In this respect, the hybrid gutta-percha condensation technique turned out to be superior to the four other condensation techniques.     

The sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer used with five gutta-percha obturation techniques

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the apical sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer (AH-26) when used with different gutta-percha obturation techniques (i.e. cold lateral condensation, warm vertical condensation, hybrid condensation) and with Thermafil and Soft-Core obturators. Straight single-rooted teeth with mature apices were prepared according to the crown-down/step-back technique and divided in five groups of 45 teeth and one group of 12 control teeth. After root canal filling 15 teeth of each group were kept for 1 day, another 15 teeth for 1 week, and another 15 teeth for 4 months at 37 degrees C in vacutainers in 80% relative humidity. The 237 teeth were immersed in india ink for 90 hours, each root was split and sectioned longitudinally, and the maximum extent of leakage was measured using a stereomicroscope at x6 magnification. It became clear that leakage occurred whatever technique was combined with AH26 and that leakage increased with time. The amount of apical leakage and the number of leaking teeth in the Soft-Core obturator groups was significantly higher than all other 4 gutta-percha obturation techniques combined with AH26. In this respect, the hybrid gutta-percha condensation technique turned out to be superior to the four other condensation techniques.     

Spreader penetration during lateral compaction of resilon and gutta-percha

Resilon, a thermoplastic, polyester polymer-based filling material, is a new material used for sealing root canals after chemomechanical preparation. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare nickel-titanium (NiTi) spreader penetration in root canals having a .04 taper preparation using .02 and .04 tapered master gutta-percha cones and .02 and .04 tapered master Resilon cones. Twenty canals, from extracted human teeth, were cleaned and shaped to a standardized 40/.04 size. Master cones of .02 or .04 tapered gutta-percha and .02 or .04 tapered Resilon were placed in each canal. A fine-fine NiTi spreader was then placed next to the master cone with a 1.5-kg force. The penetration depth was measured, subtracted from working length, and recorded. A significant difference in penetration depth (p < 0.01) was found for both taper of the cone and material used. The depth of spreader penetration from greatest to least was .02 tapered Resilon, .02 tapered gutta-percha, .04 tapered Resilon, and .04 tapered gutta-percha.     

In vitro study of effect of solvent on root canal retreatment

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of five different solvents: xylol, eucalyptol, halothane, chloroform and orange oil on softening gutta-percha in simulated root canals. One drop of solvent was placed into a reservoir made in a simulated canal whose channel was previously instrumented and filled with gutta-percha and N-Rickert sealer. After 5 min, softening was evaluated for each solvent by the penetration of a spreader while applying force with a 442 Instron apparatus to reach a depth of 5 mm. The results were analyzed statistically by the Kruskal-Wallis test. Xylol and orange oil were better in softening gutta-percha than the other solvents. There was no significant difference between xylol and orange oil, but these were statistically different from eucalyptol, halothane and chloroform (p < 0.01).     

A comparative study of the apical leakage of four root canal sealers and laterally condensed gutta-percha.

Previous studies have shown that lateral condensation of gutta-percha and sealer can provide an adequate apical seal. The purpose of this study was to compare the level of apical dye penetration when different sealers were used. One-hundred twenty-five teeth with single root canals were biomechanically prepared using the step-back technique and irrigation with EDTAC and 1% NaOCl solutions. The teeth were divided into five groups of 25 teeth each. The control group root canals were filled with laterally condensed gutta-percha and no sealer and the other four groups were filled with laterally condensed gutta-percha and either Apexit, Sealapex, Tubli-Seal, or AH26 sealer. After storage in 100% humidity at 37 degrees C for 48 h, the root surfaces were coated with nail varnish (except at the apex) and placed in 2% methylene blue dye solution and centrifuged at 3 x g for 3 min. The roots were sectioned transversely at 1-mm intervals to determine the following mean levels of dye penetrations: Apexit, 1.67 mm; Sealapex, 2.28 mm; Tubli-Seal, 1.95 mm; AH26, 0.82 mm; and gutta-percha alone, 8.37 mm. This study demonstrated that a root canal sealer should be used in conjunction with laterally condensed gutta-percha and that AH26 sealer provides a significantly better apical seal than the other sealers.     

纳米根管充填材料根尖封闭能力的实验研究

目的 观察纳米材料根充后根尖微渗漏请况，评价其根尖封闭能力。方法 30颗离体单根管牙牙根，随机分为三组，每组10个，预备完成的根管用牙胶尖和一种根管糊荆、采用侧方加压法进行充填。根据染料在牙根中的渗入深度，评价根尖微渗漏情况。结果 三种材料的根尖微渗漏有显著差异（P〈0．01）；n-ZO组的根尖微渗漏最小，n-HA组次之，ZOE组最大。结论 纳米氧化锌糊剂和纳米羟磷灰石糊剂具有良好的根尖封闭性，可以作为根管封闭剞用于根管充填。     

A comparison of root fracture resistance using two root canal sealers

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare in vitro root fracture resistance following root canal filling with either Ketac-Endo or Roth's root canal sealer. METHODOLOGY: The roots of 40 teeth with single canals were instrumented and placed randomly into four groups of 10 teeth. The prepared canals were obturated with lateral compaction using gutta-percha and Roth's 801 sealer, lateral compaction and Ketac-Endo sealer or with a single cone and Ketac-Endo sealer; the fourth group acted as unfilled controls. The roots were stored for 2 weeks in 100% humidity prior to being mounted in acrylic resin blocks. A steel tipped rod attached to an Instron testing machine was positioned against the canal opening and a slowly increasing force was applied until root fracture occurred. The results were subjected to statistical analysis using Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of force required to vertically fracture the roots. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the use of Ketac-Endo sealer in conjunction with lateral compaction or single-cone obturation techniques does not increase the fracture resistance of root-filled teeth.     

Apical sealing efficacy of endodontic obturation techniques

Summary. This study in vitro utilized methylene blue dye to evaluate root canal apical leakage after maxillary central incisors were serially instrumented and obturated with laterally condensed guta-percha and sealer, a single fitted gutta-percha master cone and sealer, sealer alone or paste alone. The linear extent of dye penetration was measured, and the volume of dye leakage was evaluated using a dye-recovery spectrophotometric technique. Under the conditions of this study, the teeth obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha and sealer exhibited the least leakage. The single gutta-percha cone and sealer technique had no advantage over use of sealer or paste when used alone.     

The Effect of Root Preparation Technique and Instrumentation Length on the Development of Apical Root Cracks

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of root canal preparation techniques and instrumentation length on the development of apical root cracks. Forty extracted mandibular premolars with straight roots were randomly selected and mounted on resin blocks with simulated periodontal ligaments, and the apex was exposed. The teeth were divided into four groups of 10 teeth each for different canal preparation techniques and instrumentation lengths: group A: step-back preparation (SB) with stainless steel files (SF) using root canal length (RCL) to guide instrumentation length; group B: SB using RCL ? 1 mm; group C: crown-down preparation (CD) with Profile using RCL; and group D: CD with PF using RCL ? 1 mm. Digital images of the instrumentation sequence were compared for each tooth. Statistical analysis revealed a significant effect of instrumentation length (p < 0.05) but no significant effect of preparation technique (p > 0.05) on the development of apical cracks.     

The long-term sealing ability of an epoxy resin root canal sealer used with five gutta percha obturation techniques

AIM: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the long-term sealing ability (both apical and coronal) of an epoxy resin root canal sealer (AH26) when used with different gutta-percha obturation techniques. METHODOLOGY: Straight single-rooted teeth with mature apices were divided into 10 groups of 75 teeth and one group of 40 control teeth. Root canals were prepared according to the crown-down/step-back technique and using both 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and an EDTA paste. Root canals were obturated using cold lateral condensation, warm vertical condensation and hybrid condensation of gutta-percha; and with Thermafil and Soft-Core obturators. AH26 was used as the sealer in all cases. After root canal filling, each group was divided into five individual groups of 15 teeth. The first group of 15 teeth was kept for 1 day, the second for 1 week, the third for 4 months, the fourth for 6 months and the fifth for 12 months at 37 degrees C in vacutainers in 80% relative humidity. The teeth were immersed in India ink for 90 h, each root was split and sectioned longitudinally, and the maximum extent of leakage was measured using a stereomicroscope at x6 magnification. RESULTS: Leakage occurred whatever filling technique was combined with AH26. The number of teeth with gross leakage increased with time up to 4 months, but did not appear to increase between 6 and 12 months storage. The degree of apical leakage and the number of leaking teeth in the Soft-Core obturator groups was significantly higher than all four other gutta-percha obturation techniques. Up to 4 months the degree of coronal leakage and the number of leaking teeth in the Thermafil groups was significantly higher than the other gutta-percha obturation techniques, except for Soft-Core. In the Soft-Core obturator groups the degree of coronal leakage and the number of leaking teeth was significantly higher than the other gutta-percha obturation techniques, except for Thermafil at all evaluation times. CONCLUSION: The hybrid gutta-percha condensation technique was superior to the other four obturation techniques in respect of apical leakage. Coronal leakage was significantly greater during the first 4 months for the Thermafil system as compared to the three condensation techniques; coronal leakage was significantly greater at all time periods for the Soft-Core system. There were no significant differences between the Thermafil and the Soft-core system.     

Apical microleakage after lateral condensation, hybrid gutta-percha condensation and Soft-Core obturation: an in vitro evaluation

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the apical seal of root canals filled with a cold lateral condensation, a hybrid gutta-percha condensation technique and with Soft-Core obturators. Three groups of 35 maxillary anterior teeth and four control anterior teeth were treated with a crown-down/step-back technique. All roots were submerged in India ink for 1 week. The roots were cleared and the degree of linear dye penetration was measured. The mean apical leakage for the Soft-Core technique was at least twice as extensive as for the two other gutta-percha obturation techniques. No statistically significant differences were found between the two other condensation techniques.     

Effectiveness of rotary and hand files in gutta-percha and sealer removal using chloroform or chlorhexidine gel

The purpose of this study was to assess in vitro the efficacy of nickel-titanium K3 rotary files and hand files for removal of gutta-percha and sealer from obturated root canals using either chloroform or chlorhexidine as solvents. Sixty extracted single-rooted bovine teeth with straight, large canals were prepared, obtured and randomly assigned to 3 groups (n=20). The teeth were stored at 37 degrees C for 1 month and then the gutta-percha and sealer were removed using different techniques, as follows. Group I: size 3 Gates-Glidden drills plus size 30 hand K-files and Hedstr?m files and chloroform; Group II: K3 NiTi rotary files and chloroform; and Group III: K3 NiTi rotary files and 2% chlorhexidine gel. Radiographs were taken and scanned and the images were digitized. The total area of the canal and the area with remaining obturation material were measured in millimeters using a computed image analysis system (ImageLab). Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and Tukey test at 5% significance level. The groups differed statistically (p<0.05) with respect to the average percentage of remaining gutta-percha and sealer, presenting the following sequence of effectiveness (from most to least effective): Group I (15.48%), Group II (28.42%) and Group III (35.96%). The findings of this study showed that, despite the technique used for removal of filling material, none of the retreated canals were completely free of gutta-percha and sealer remnants. The use of stainless steel hand files resulted in a lesser amount of filling debris than the use of nickel-titanium rotary instruments.