Evaluation of HER2 gene amplification in invasive breast cancer using a dual‐color chromogenic in situ hybridization (dual CISH)

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assay is considered the ‘gold standard’ for evaluation of HER2/neu (HER2) gene status, however, it is difficult to recognize morphologic features of tumors using fluorescence microscopy. Thus, chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) has been proposed as an alternative method to evaluate HER2 gene amplification. Here, we examined the dual color CISH (dual CISH) method which provides information regarding the copy number of the HER2 gene and chromosome 17 centromere from a single slide. We examined 40 cases of invasive ductal carcinomas of the breast that were resected surgically. HER2 gene status was assessed with FISH (Abbott) and dual CISH (Dako). HER2 gene amplification status was classified according to the guidelines of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP). Comparison of the cut‐off values for HER2/chromosome 17 centromere copy number ratio obtained by dual CISH and FISH showed that there was almost perfect agreement between two methods (Kappa coefficient 0.96). The results of the two commercial products were almost consistent for evaluation of HER2 gene counts on the sections. The current study proved that dual CISH is comparable with FISH for evaluating HER2 gene status.     

Dual-colour chromogenic in-situ hybridization is a potential alternative to fluorescence in-situ hybridization in HER2 testing

Hwang C‐C, Pintye M, Chang L‐C, Chen H‐Y, Yeh K‐Y, Chein H‐P, Lee N & Chen J‐R
(2011) Histopathology 59 , 984–992 Dual‐colour chromogenic in‐situ hybridization is a potential alternative to fluorescence in‐situ hybridization in HER2 testing Aim: Dual‐colour chromogenic in‐situ hybridization (dc‐CISH) is an emerging methodology for characterizing genomic alterations. This study was aimed at evaluating the performance of a dc‐CISH kit (ZytoVision) in determining human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status in breast cancer. Methods and results: Two hundred and twenty‐eight invasive breast carcinomas arranged in tissue microarrays were analysed in parallel with dc‐CISH, fluorescence in‐situ hybridization (FISH), and immunohistochemistry. Of 227 tumours with available FISH and dc‐CISH results, HER2 amplification and non‐amplification were detected in 49 (21.6%) and 178 (78.4%) tumours, respectively, by both assays. The concordance between dc‐CISH and FISH results showed 100% agreement (κ‐coefficient = 1.00). Immunohistochemically, 162 (71%), 25 (11.0%) and 41 (18%) tumours were scored 0/1+, 2+, and 3+, respectively. The corresponding results with both FISH and dc‐CISH demonstrated HER2 amplification in two (3.2%), nine (36%) and 38 (93%) tumours, respectively. Complete consensus among these three methods was observed in 197 cases, representing 98% of all 3+ and 0/1+ tumours (κ‐coefficient = 0.92). Confirmatory testing of 25 2+ tumours showed complete consensus between FISH and dc‐CISH. Conclusions: dc‐CISH is a promising alternative to FISH in HER2 testing, and the single‐institute incidence of HER2 amplification in breast cancer in Taiwan is 21.2%.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) to detect HER2 gene amplification in breast and gastric cancer: Comparison with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH)

The chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) assay, designed to detect the amplification of the HER2 gene in formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) breast cancer (BC) and gastric cancer (GC) tissue specimens, was evaluated in 125 FFPE BC cases and 198 FFPE GC cases for which the HER2 status had been predetermined using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In the 125 BC cases and the 198 gastric cases, we found a very good concordance (98.4% and 99.0%, respectively) between CISH and FISH. In particular, we evaluated the polysomy cases, as these cases often have ambiguous treatment options in clinical practice. The polysomy of chromosome 17 was defined as the presence of three or more CEP17 signals in at least 10% of the tumor cells. In the 50 BC cases and 54 GC cases displaying chromosome 17 polysomy, the concordance between FISH and CISH was 98.0% and 98.1%, respectively. These results indicate that CISH could provide an accurate and practical alternative to FISH for the clinical diagnosis of HER2 gene amplification in FFPE BC and FFPE GC samples.     

Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens

García‐Caballero T, Grabau D, Green A R, Gregory J, Schad A, Kohlwes E, Ellis I O, Watts S & Mollerup J
(2010) Histopathology 56, 472–480
Determination of HER2 amplification in primary breast cancer using dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization is comparable to fluorescence in situ hybridization: a European multicentre study involving 168 specimens Aims: Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) can be used to reveal several genomic imbalances relevant to proper cancer diagnosis and to the correct treatment regime. However, FISH requires expensive and advanced fluorescence microscopes in addition to expertise in fluorescence microscopy. To determine whether a newly developed dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) method is a suitable alternative to FISH, we analysed the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 gene (HER2) amplification level of 168 breast cancer specimens using dual‐colour CISH and FISH and compared the results. Methods and results: We found 100% agreement between HER2 status determined by FISH and dual‐colour CISH. Furthermore, we observed that the time used to score slides was significantly reduced by 28% in dual‐colour CISH compared with the FISH protocol. Concordance between HER2 protein status and dual‐colour CISH or FISH was equally good with an overall agreement of 96.8%. Correlation between the HER2/centromere 17 gene ratios obtained with dual‐colour CISH and FISH was highly significant with an overall correlation coefficient (ρ) of 0.96. Conclusions: We conclude that dual‐colour CISH and bright field microscopy are excellent alternatives to FISH when analysing the HER2 status of primary breast cancer.     

Detection of Her-2/neu oncogene in breast carcinoma by chromogenic in situ hybridization in cytologic specimens

Determination of Her-2/neu oncogene amplification is important in the current treatment of breast carcinoma. In addition to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and immunohistochemical stain (HercepTest), chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) has been shown to be a sensitive and specific method to determine the Her-2/neu status of surgical specimens. The effectiveness of CISH in detecting the Her-2/neu oncogene in cytologic specimens has not been well documented. Twenty-five cases of fine needle aspirate smears and touch imprints from infiltrating ductal carcinomas were examined. Both CISH and FISH were performed on each case using a digoxigenin-labeled Her-2 DNA probe for CISH (Zymed) and both Her-2 and chromosome 17 probes for FISH (Vysis). Sixty tumor cells were evaluated in each case. The scoring system and interpretation of CISH were as follows: (1) no amplification (<5 brown dots/nucleus), (2) amplification (>10 brown dots/nucleus), and (3) low-level amplification (5-9 brown dots/nucleus). Of the 25 cases analyzed, 23 (3 amplified and 20 nonamplified) showed similar results for both methods. Two cases were discordant. In these cases, low-level amplification was suggested by CISH but nonamplification by FISH. One of the cases can be explained by polysomy for chromosome 17 by FISH. In conclusion, our preliminary data suggest that CISH is a useful technique to determine Her-2/neu oncogene status in cytologic specimens. In a case of low-level amplification, a CISH chromosome 17 probe should be used, or FISH is recommended for confirmation.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization for Her‐2/neu‐oncogene in breast cancer: comparison of a new dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization

Aims: Her‐2/neu testing is used as a marker for Herceptin^® therapy. The aim was to investigate new dual‐colour chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH), in a large number of breast carcinomas (n = 205) with DNA‐specific dual‐colour probes (ZytoVision, Bremerhaven, Germany) and to compare the results with immunohistochemistry (n = 205) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (n = 129). Methods and results: Paraffin‐embedded tissue of 205 patients was used. After immunohistochemistry with a focus on immunohistochemically uncertain cases, Her‐2/neu amplification using dual‐colour CISH (ZytoVision^®) was analysed. Validation by FISH was performed. The results were: immunohistochemistry, 27.8% with strong expression, 53.7% with uncertain overexpression and 18.5% with no expression; FISH, 25.6% amplified and 74.4% negative; CISH, 35.6% amplified, 62.9% negative and 1.5% not evaluable. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with CISH: CISH negative in 100% with immunohistochemistry 0/1+, amplified in 82.5% with immunohistochemistry 3+; 5.9% contradictory results: 4.4% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by CISH, 1.5% negative in immunohistochemistry but amplified by CISH; FISH (129 cases), 8.5% contradictory results to immunohistochemistry, 6.2% immunohistochemistry 3+ and negative by FISH, 2.3% negative by immunohistochemistry and amplified by FISH; comparison of CISH and FISH, 94.6% same results, 3.9% different ones, 1.6% CISH not analysable. Conclusions: CISH, using dual‐colour probes (ZytoVision^®) is as good as FISH for Her‐2/neu analysis. The few discrepant results are likely to be caused by polysomy or tumour heterogeneity.     

Comparison between immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization in assessing HER-2 status in breast cancer

Human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) is usually determined as a potential target for breast cancer therapy. The purpose of the present study was to compare chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in determination of HER-2 status, in metastatic breast cancer patients screened for the clinical study of chemotherapy +/- herceptin. It was possible to assess both CISH and IHC in 56 cases, using CISH Detection Kit (Zymed) and HercepTest (DakoCytomation), respectively. HER-2 was amplified by CISH in 32 cases (57%) while 33 (59%) were HER-2-positive by IHC. A concordance between HER-2 status determined by CISH and IHC was noted in 43 of 56 cases (77%; P = 0.00008). Gene amplification was observed in 6/16 cases (37.5%) in IHC-negative subgroup (1+), while no amplification was observed in 5/10 cases (50%) in the IHC-positive subgroup (2+). These results suggest that there was a greater heterogeneity on the genetic level and that simple IHC classification was not sufficient. It is suggested that CISH could be considered as a useful additional method to IHC in determining HER-2 status in breast cancer patients, with a recommendation for testing not only the 2+ but also the 1+ subgroup of patients.     

Chromogenic in situ hybridization analysis of HER-2/neu status in breast carcinoma: application in screening of patients for trastuzumab (Herceptin) therapy

Evaluation of HER-2/neu status is important in the management of patients with breast carcinoma, especially in determining the possible application of trastuzumab, a humanized anti-HER-2/neu monoclonal antibody. Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) detection of the HER-2/neu oncogene is a newly developed in situ hybridization method that utilizes a robust and unique-sequence DNA probe labeled with digoxygenin, and sequential incubations with antidigoxygenin fluorescein, antifluorescein peroxidase, and diaminobenzidine. In this study, we examined 20 archival specimens of human breast carcinoma using CISH, and we correlated findings with immunohistochemical findings for HER-2/neu. HER-2/neu immunohistochemistry was carried out with HercepTest, a standardized immunohistochemical examination system for HER-2/neu overexpression in surgical pathology specimens. CISH analysis could be done in 18 out of 20 cases examined. Gene copy signals for HER-2/neu were recognized as intranuclear brown dots in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells. Seven carcinomas showed an increased number or size of signals and were interpreted as being positive for HER-2/neu amplification. Eight cases were positive with the HercepTest. Seven out of eight carcinoma cases found to overexpress immunoreactive HER-2/neu also demonstrated HER-2/neu gene amplification following CISH analysis. There was a significant correlation between immunohistochemical and CISH analyses (P < 0.001). We found that CISH was a specific, sensitive and easily applicable method for the detection of HER-2/neu gene amplification, which may be used together with immunohistochemical examination for the evaluation of patients with breast carcinoma.     

Detection of c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) amplification in breast carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization on tissue sections and imprinted cells

Abnormalities in c-erbB-2 have attracted a great deal of attention. Treatment using an antibody against the c-erbB-2 gene product is effective against breast cancers with amplification and/or overexpression of c-erbB-2. There is an urgent need to establish methodology for selecting patients who would benefit from this therapy. A total of 235 breast carcinomas were examined for c-erbB-2 protein overexpression by immunohistochemistry. Tissue sections with discernible immunostaining from 52 tumors, 70 negative tumors and smear imprints from 35 patients were examined by dual-color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using probes specific for c-erbB-2 and the centromeric region of chromosome 17. The concordance between gene amplification and protein overexpression was 95.7%. When the findings of the two FISH preparation techniques were compared, no discrepancies were found in 24 of the tumors. However, differences were seen in eight cases. In six of these cases the differences did not affect the presence or absence of amplification, but in the other two cases, considered to show low-level amplification on paraffin sections, polysomy 17 was detected instead. It was concluded that FISH is an excellent tool to detect gene amplification in particular, and FISH on touch imprints is a useful adjunct to differentiate between low-level amplification and polysomy 17.     

Prognostic value of HER2 gene amplification detected by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) in metastatic breast cancer

After so many years of research, clinical value of HER2 (Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) is unclear. Perhaps the main reason is variability of testing methods that produce controversial results. There is a lack of studies regarding prognostic value of CISH especially in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) when risk evaluation is based on different parameters than for primary breast cancer. Aim of this study was to compare prognostic relevance of HER2 status in MBC tested by two different methods i.e. immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH).HER2 status of the same group of 107 MBC patients was determined by IHC (protein overexpression) and by CISH (gene amplification). HER2 results obtained by IHC and CISH showed significant correlation, beside the existence of discrepancies. Beside the significant correlation in two methods, there was a difference in prognostic values of compared methods during the course of metastatic disease. There was a significant difference in progression-free interval (PFI) between HER2 non-amplified and HER2 amplified cases determined by CISH, in postmenopausal subgroup and node-positive subgroup, but no significant difference for IHC stratified MBC patients. CISH seems to be accurate and more informative method than IHC regarding prognostic value of HER2 in metastatic breast cancer.     

Detection of numerical alterations of chromosome 1 in cytopathological specimens of breast tumors by chromogen in situ hybridization

To investigate the effectiveness of chromogen in situ hybridization (CISH) in the diagnosis of breast tumors, numerical alterations of chromosome 1 were examined by CISH and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) methods, and the presence of der(16)t(1;16) was also examined by FISH in imprinted cytology specimens from resected tissues of 14 carcinomas and five non-malignant lesions. The modal signal counts of chromosome 1 were compared between the specimens processed by CISH and FISH for each case. Aneusomies of the long arm of chromosome 1 were detected in 10 (71%) carcinomas as the major clones by both methods. In addition, one atypical papilloma demonstrated tetrasomy of 1q12 as a major clone by CISH, but such a clone was at first overlooked by FISH. Four other benign lesions showed disomic 1q12 signals as a major clone by both CISH and FISH. As additional information from FISH, eight cancers showed structural or numerical alterations of chromosome 16, and four showed der(16)t(1;16). In total, 10 carcinomas showed chromosome 16 alterations, and all of these overlapped with the carcinomas with 1q12 aneusomies. The CISH method provided almost the same results as the FISH method, and both methods were considered applicable in supportive diagnosis of cytological specimens of breast tumors. In addition, the CISH method was superior in the detection of numerical alterations in carcinoma cells by referring to the morphology of cells and in the detection of significant clones which might be missed under dark-field microscopy.     

Dual-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis of synovial sarcoma

Mounting cytogenetic evidence indicates that synovial sarcomas, regardless of histological conformation, share the specific reciprocal chromosomal translocation t(X;18)(p11.2;q11.2). Application of dual-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on interphase nuclei isolated from archival paraffin-embedded material to identify the specific translocation is of diagnostic importance for pathological practice and retrospective study. Five cases of well-characterized biphasic synovial sarcomas, two monophasic fibrous synovial sarcomas, one embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma, one fibrosarcoma, and one malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumour were analysed. To visualize the translocated chromosomal fragments and their topographic relationships with centromeres of chromosomes X and 18, nuclei from each case were hybridized concurrently with chromosome X centromeric and chromosome 18 painting probes, and chromosome 18 centromeric and chromosome X painting probes, respectively. Six out of seven synovial sarcomas showed chromosomal alterations consistent with t(X;18). One biphasic synovial sarcoma had trisomy 18 and lacked the chromosomal translocation t(X;18). The other three spindle cell sarcomas and the normal control tissues showed the normal numerical and structural composition for chromosomes X and 18. It is indicated from the present study that when histological differential diagnosis is difficult, FISH would be a crucial aid in detecting a known specific chromosomal alteration and that dual-colour FISH is an efficient stable diagnostic tool for pathological research and daily diagnosis. The results also suggest that rare synovial sarcomas may lack the chromosomal translocation t(X;18). © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridisation with fluorescence in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry for the assessment of her-2/neu oncogene in archival material of breast carcinoma

The successful treatment of breast cancer is dependent upon a number of complex factors. Her-2/neu gene amplification is known to be one of the most common genetic alterations associated with breast cancer and its accurate determination has become necessary for the selection of patients for trastuzumab therapy.The aim of this study was to prove the consistency of chromogenic in situ hybridisation (CISH) technique after analyzing the overexpression of the Her-2/neu proto-oncogene in 100 invasive breast carcinomas and by comparing CISH results with immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH). Moreover, it was done to evaluate the possible correlation of estrogen (ERs) and progesterone receptors (PRs), the proliferation marker Ki67 and the tumour suppressor gene p53 with HER-2/neu status of these breast carcinomas.Of the 100 breast carcinomas that were analysed, 22 cases showed HER-2/neu amplification, 66 cases showed no amplification, whereas 12 cases were non-interpretable in both assays (FISH and CISH). Consequently, the overall concordance between FISH and CISH was 100%. Additionally, it was observed that when HER-2/neu gene was overexpressed, there was an association with negative PRs and ERs status, negative p53 protein expression and high Ki67 labelling index.It is concluded that patients with tumours scoring 2+ with the CBE356 antibody (borderline immunohistochemistry-tested cases) would also benefit from CISH as it is shown to be highly accurate, practical and can be easily integrated into routine testing in any histopathology laboratory. Finally, CISH represents an important addition to the HER2 testing algorithm.     

Impact of polysomy 17 on HER2 testing of invasive breast cancer patients

Background: Current American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guidelines define HER2-positive tumors as those with > 6 HER2 genes per nucleus or those with HER2/CEP17 (chromosome 17) ratio > 2.2. These guidelines are potentially contradictory in tumors with polysomy of chromosome 17. The current study was performed to determine the impact of polysomy 17 on the interpretation of HER2 testing of invasive breast carcinomas. Methods: Chromosome 17 copies and HER2 gene status were identified by fluorescent in situ hybridization in 384 cases with invasive breast cancer, and the corresponding HER2 expression was obtained by immunohistochemistry stain. Results: The average CEP17 copy number for the group was 2.1 (range, 1.0-12.4). Forty-eight cases (13.8%, 48/348) were identified as chromosome 17 polysomy with CEP 17 copy number ≥ 3. Ninety-two (26.4%) cases had > 6 copies of HER2 per nucleus, and 92 cases (26.4%) qualified as HER2 gene amplified using the HER2/CEP17 ratio (> 2.2) guideline. Polysomy 17 showed poorly positive correlations with both HER2 gene copy number and HER2 overexpression (P < 0.01, r = 0.338 and 0.271, respectively). The distribution of clinicopathologic parameters of Polysomy 17 tumors was more similar to HER2 negative than HER2 positive tumors. Conclusions: Polysomy 17 is a crucial cause of equivocal HER2 testing results by FISH, depending on which criterion (ratio vs. absolute number) is used for interpretation. Polysomy 17 cannot be an independent predictive factor for HER2 gene amplification or protein overexpression.     

Analysis of HER2 by chromogenic in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry in lymph node-negative breast carcinoma: Prognostic relevance

In patients with lymph node-negative breast carcinoma (LNNBC), the prevalence of HER2 overexpression and gene amplification and their prognostic value have not been extensively evaluated. We examined 162 patients with LNNBC with complete follow-up. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for HER2, Ki67, and p53 was performed. HER2 gene status was analyzed by chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) and discordant cases by fluorescence in situ hybridization. HER2 overexpression was seen in 24.7% of cases (40/162) and amplification by CISH in 17.6% (28/159). Agreement between IHC and CISH was achieved in 147 (92.5%) cases. Amplification was seen in 21 (100%) of 21 (3+), 6 (35.3%) of 17 (2+), and 1 (0.6%) of 121 (0-1+) tumors. Fluorescence in situ hybridization detected 3 (1.8%) additional cases. HER2 overexpression and amplification were present in tumors of high grade, with necrosis and lymph-vascular invasion (LVI) (all P < .027). In addition, amplified tumors showed Ki67 of more than 20% and p53 overexpression (P < .05). By univariate analysis, shorter disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were seen for patients with tumors showing HER2 amplification, LVI, and Ki67 of more than 20% (P < .05) (Kaplan-Meier). However, the multivariate analysis (Cox regression) demonstrated only Ki67 as an independent prognostic factor for both DFS (P = .017) and OS (P = .010), and as a trend for HER2 gene status (OS, P = .087) and LVI (DFS, P = .11; OS, P = .063). We conclude that IHC is a reliable method for detecting HER2 expression that can be complemented by CISH in nondefinitive cases (2+). Moreover, CISH is a valuable tool for the assessment of HER2 gene status with potential prognostic value and, therefore, in clinical decision making for treatment of high-risk LNNBC.     

乳腺癌组织HER2基因扩增的检测方法

目的:评价高分辨率熔体聚合酶链反应(high-resolution melt polymerase chain reaction,HRM-PCR)检测HER2基因扩增的有效性及其与荧光原位杂交(fluorescence in situ hybridization,FISH)和免疫组织化学(immunohistochemistry,IHC)检测法的一致性.方法:采用HRM-PCR法检测HER2阴性及阳性细胞株,评估检测方法的有效性;检测98例已行FISH和/或IHC的临床样本,并与FISH和IHC结果进行比较.结果:HRM-PCR检测可以有效区分HER2阴性及阳性细胞株(P<0.05),具有较好的可重复性;检测98例临床样本显示,阴性和阳性样本检测结果差异有统计学意义(0.18±0.14 vs 1.42±0.88,P<0.01),与IHC的一致性为80.33%(kappa=0.6,P<0.01),与FISH的一致性为87.88%(kappa=0.7,P<0.01),结论:HRM-PCR是一种可靠有效的检测HER2基因扩增的方法,与FISH和IHC均有较好的一致性.     

EGFR gene copy number heterogeneity in fine-needle aspiration cytology from breast carcinomas determined by chromogenic in situ hybridization

Most studies have shown epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression to be associated with poor prognostic factors in breast carcinomas. The relationship to EGFR gene copy number is unclear. The aim of our study was to investigate the heterogeneity of the EGFR gene copy number in breast carcinomas. The material consisted of air-dried smears from 29 breast carcinomas and 3 breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7, SKBR3, and T47D). Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) was done using chromogenic detection. The mean signal numbers for EGFR gene and chromosome 7 as well as the EGFR gene/chromosome 7 centromere probe (CEP7) ratio were recorded. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was done on the corresponding paraffin sections.The copy number of the EGFR gene in each tumor/cell line ranged from 1.2 to 5.6. The EGFR gene/CEP7 ratio showed a biological continuum ranging from 0.59 to 1.94 with a mean of 1.04. EGFR gene copy loss was found in 16.6% of cases whereas copy gain was demonstrated in 19.4%. There was no relationship between IHC protein expression of EGFR and EGFR gene copy number or EGFR gene/CEP7 ratio.In conclusion, most breast carcinomas had a balanced EGFR gene/CEP7 copy number with a mean ratio of 1.04. Almost equal subpopulations revealed limited copy gain and copy loss. EGFR high dosage amplification, like in HER-2, was not demonstrated. Demonstration of EGFR gene copy loss might have a potential as a surrogate marker for EGFR gene mutation and/or deletion.     

Correlation between immunohistochemistry (HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for HER-2 in 426 breast carcinomas from 37 centres

Accurate diagnostic assessment of HER-2 is essential for the appropriate application of the humanized anti-HER-2 monoclonal antibody trastuzumab (Herceptin) to the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The diagnostic test needs to be applicable to archival, fixed tissue removed at excision, in many cases several years earlier. We compared the assessment of HER-2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC; HercepTest) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in 426 breast carcinomas from patients being considered for trastuzumab therapy. The tumours were tested in three reference centres having been sent in from 37 hospitals. Only 2/270 (0.7%) IHC 0/1+ tumours were FISH positive. Six of 102 (5.9%) IHC 3+ tumours were FISH negative. Five of the six had between 1.75 and 2.0 HER-2 gene copies per chromosome 17 and the sixth had multiple copies of chromosome 17. Thirteen per cent of tumours were IHC 2+ and overall 48% of these were FISH positive but this proportion varied markedly between the centres. Sixty IHC-stained slides selected to be enriched with 2+ cases were circulated between the three laboratories and scored. There were 20 cases in which there was some discordance in scoring. Consideration of the FISH score in these cases led to concordance in the designation of positivity/negativity in 19 of these 20 cases. These data support an algorithm in which FISH testing is restricted to IHC 2+ tumours in reference centres. The results may not extrapolate to laboratories with less experience or using different methodologies.     

Expression and amplification of Her2, EGFR and cyclin D1 in breast cancer: immunohistochemistry and chromogenic in situ hybridization

Determination of Her2, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and cyclin D1 status is now of major clinical importance due to the development of molecule-targeting drugs in anticancer therapy. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) and chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) are the most simple and convenient methods for evaluating gene alterations and their protein consequences. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the status of Her2, EGFR and cyclin D1 on both IHC and CISH in 95 primary breast carcinomas. There was substantial consistency between the IHC and CISH results of Her2 and EGFR, showing fair agreement between protein overexpression and gene amplification. However, cyclin D amplification was not related to protein overexpression. Moreover, there was no correlation between Her2, EGFR and cyclin D1. Her2 protein overexpression and amplification were positively associated with histological grade, nuclear grade and inversely correlated with the expression of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR). In ER-negative and postmenopausal patients, EGFR gene amplification was strongly associated with worse recurrence-free survival (P = 0.0087, P = 0.0149, respectively). Overall, the present findings suggest that EGFR gene amplification is important in predicting prognosis and this should be evaluated in breast carcinoma in addition to Her2 status in routine pathological practice.