Acute and continuation risperidone monotherapy in bipolar mania: a 3-week placebo-controlled trial followed by a 9-week double-blind trial of risperidone and haloperidol.

In a randomized, double-blind trial, patients with acute bipolar mania received 1-6 mg/day of risperidone, 2-12 mg/day of haloperidol, or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by double-blind risperidone or haloperidol for 9 weeks. Of 438 patients, 154 were randomized to risperidone, 144 to haloperidol, and 140 to placebo. The mean+/-S.D. modal doses were 4.2+/-1.7 mg/day of risperidone and 8.0+/-3.6 mg/day of haloperidol during the initial 3-week phase and 4.1+/-1.8 and 7.4+/-3.7 mg/day during the 12-week period. At week 3, mean Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) score reductions from baseline were significantly greater in patients receiving risperidone than placebo (p<0.001). Differences between risperidone and haloperidol on this efficacy measure were not significant. Further reductions in YMRS scores were seen in patients receiving risperidone or haloperidol during the subsequent 9 weeks. No unexpected adverse events were reported. Extrapyramidal disorder and hyperkinesias, the most commonly reported adverse events with antipsychotic use, occurred less frequently with risperidone than haloperidol. We conclude that risperidone monotherapy was an effective and well-tolerated treatment for bipolar mania and that efficacy was maintained over the long term.     

Effects of lithium carbonate and haloperidol on cognition in aggressive hospitalized school-age children

A comparison of the effects of lithium, haloperidol, and placebo on cognition is reported for a sample of hospitalized school-age children with a behavioral profile of aggressiveness and explosiveness. In this double-blind study, patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions. The cognitive battery was administered at the end of a 2-week placebo baseline period and again after 4 weeks of treatment. It included a simple reaction time (RT) task with preparatory intervals of 1, 4, and 8 seconds, the Porteus Mazes, and the Matching Familiar Figures Test. Drug effects on cognition, when found, were mild. Slower and more variable RTs were found on the RT task in the haloperidol group (mean dose, 3.1 mg/day), particularly at the 4- and 8-second preparatory intervals in comparison to placebo. This appeared to reflect decreased ability to hold a preparatory set. No other effects of haloperidol on cognitive performance were found. Lithium carbonate (mean dose, 1150 mg/day) caused a deterioration in qualitative performance on the Porteus Maze Test when compared with haloperidol but had no effect on test quotient scores or on the other cognitive measures. Results are discussed in terms of dose effects and the influences of task demands. This is part of a study critically assessing the effects of lithium and haloperidol on behavioral symptoms and other parameters.     

Effects of raclopride treatment on plasma and CSF HVA: relationships with clinical improvement in male schizophrenics

Thirty-two acutely psychotic, male schizophrenic patients received raclopride, at 2, 6, or 12 mg/day, or haloperidol, 15 mg/day for 4 weeks after randomized, double-blind assignment. Twenty-six patients, including 19 who had been assigned one of the three doses of raclopride, completed the study. Raclopride, particularly at 12 mg/day, increased CSF homovanillic acid (HVA) at 4 weeks, and plasma HVA at 2 days, of treatment. The clinical response to raclopride was significantly correlated with plasma raclopride concentrations and baseline plasma HVA concentrations. Although raclopride is a substituted benzamide with atypical properties in animals, these results suggest that the doses of raclopride required for clinical efficacy and elevation of clinical indices of brain dopamine turnover are similar.     

Amitriptyline versus haloperidol in borderlines: final outcomes and predictors of response

The authors report the final results of a 4-year study of amitriptyline and haloperidol in 90 symptomatic borderline inpatients. Medication trials were double-blind and placebo controlled and lasted 5 weeks. Haloperidol (4-16 mg/day) produced significant improvement over placebo in global functioning, depression, hostility, schizotypal symptoms, and impulsive behavior. Significant effects of amitriptyline (100-175 mg/day) were generally limited to measures of depression. Factor analysis identified three symptom change patterns: a global depression, hostile depression, and schizotypal symptom pattern. Medication effects favoring haloperidol were most prominent for hostile depression. Variables predicting favorable response to haloperidol included severity of schizotypal symptoms, hostility, and suspiciousness. Schizotypal symptoms and paranoia predicted poor outcome on both depression patterns with amitriptyline. Placebo effects were most prominent on acute state symptoms, with severe character traits predicting poor response.     

A comparison of the effects of olanzapine, haloperidol and placebo on cognitive and psychomotor functions in healthy elderly volunteers.

The cognitive and psychomotor effects of olanzapine (3 mg) were compared with haloperidol (3 mg) and placebo in a double-blind, cross-over study. Fourteen healthy elderly volunteers (>65 years) were randomized to receive once daily medication for 4 days with a 16-day interval between treatment periods. Assessments of attention, memory and motor control were made prior to dosing on each day, at 2, 4, 6 and 8 h after dosing on days 1 and 4, and at 24 and 48 h following the last dose. On day 1, detectable impairment was observed at all time points in both groups. On day 4, haloperidol treated subjects showed increased impairment compared with day 1 and this was sustained throughout the 48 h of testing. Olanzapine treated subjects showed reduced day 4 deficit (compared with day 1), with no significant difference from placebo beyond 6 h post dose. These results suggest that both haloperidol and olanzapine have a measurable initial effect on cognitive and psychomotor function in elderly volunteers. However, acute effects associated with olanzapine decrease with repeated dosing and show substantial adaptation within 4 days. In contrast, effects seen with haloperidol are sustained and increase with repeated dosing over the same period.     

The effects of Ginkgo biloba extract added to haloperidol on peripheral T cell subsets in drug-free schizophrenia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Objective To investigate the effects of Ginko biloba extract (EGb) administration on T lymphocyte subsets and superoxide dismutase (SOD) levels in schizophrenia.Methods One hundred and nine schizophrenic inpatients were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with 360 mg/day of EGb plus a stable dose of 0.25 mg kg⁻¹ day⁻¹ of haloperidol and placebo plus the same dose of haloperidol using a double-blind design. Clinical efficacy was determined using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms, and Scale for Assessment of Negative Symptoms. T lymphocytes (CD3+), T helper cells (CD4+), T suppressor cells (CD8+), and IL-2-secreting cells were measured using the alkaline phosphatase/antialkaline phosphatase technique; and SOD levels were measured by radioimmunometric assay at baseline and at posttreatment, as compared to 30 sex- and age-matched normal subjects.Results Patients demonstrated significantly lower CD3+, CD4+, and IL-2-secreting cells, together with CD4/CD8 ratio, and significantly higher blood SOD levels than did healthy controls at baseline. There was a significantly negative relationship between SOD and CD4+ cells in the schizophrenic group at baseline. After a 12-week treatment, CD3+, CD4+, and IL-2-secreting cells, together with CD4/CD8 ratio, showed a significant increase, but a significant decrease in SOD levels in the EGb group. There was only a significant increase in CD4+ cells but no change in SOD levels in the placebo group. There was a significant correlation between the change in CD4+ cells at posttreatment vs pretreatment and a reduction of BPRS total score in the whole patient group.Conclusions EGb may improve the decreased peripheral immune functions in schizophrenia. The beneficial effects of EGb on the immune systems and the improvement of schizophrenic symptoms may be medicated through its antioxidant activity.     

Early phase II clinical trial of remoxipride in treatment of schizophrenia with measurements of prolactin and neuroleptic activity

Twenty hospitalized schizophrenic patients on haloperidol (doses 6 to 80 mg/day; median, 30 mg/day) underwent 4 days of placebo washout before being treated for 6 weeks with remoxipride, a new benzamide derivative with selective D2-dopamine receptor blocking properties. All patients completed the clinical trial period with week 6 doses ranging from 75 to 500 mg/day (median, 225 mg/day). Comparison of final scores with end of placebo washout showed improvement in schizophrenic symptoms in 10 patients and a reduction in the mean score for Clinical Global Impression of severity of illness (14.1%) and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale total score (23.0%). Remoxipride caused less parkinsonism than the prior neuroleptic therapy and appeared to have little masking effect on tardive dyskinesia. Only slight evidence of serum neuroleptic activity was shown by radio-receptor assay measurements using [3H]spiperone binding and calf caudates, and the drug's effect on prolactin elevation was short-lasting (less than 10 hours). The mean elimination half-life of remoxipride was 5.9 hours. These results add to the consistent impression that D2 receptor blockade predicts clinical antipsychotic effects.     

A 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil as an adjunct to haloperidol for treating cognitive impairments in patients with chronic schizophrenia

To study the effects of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEIs) in the management of cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia, we investigated the effects of 12 weeks of adjunctive therapy with donepezil on their cognitive impairments. Twenty-four subjects stabilized on haloperidol treatment (5-30 mg/day) for a minimum of 3 months were entered into a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of donepezil as an adjunctive treatment. Subjects were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive either 5 mg/day donepezil (N = 12) or pLacebo (N = 12) for 12 weeks. The subjects were evaluated at baseline, and after 4, 8, and 12 weeks using the Korean version of Mini Mental State Examination (K-MMSE), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), and standard neuropsychological assessment. The K-MMSE scores improved significantly (p < 0.05) but the BPRS scores did not improve significantly in patients given donepezil; subjects showed slight improvement in several cognitive measures. At the end of the study, the difference in the mean K-MMSE scores between the donepezil and placebo groups approached statistical significance (p = 0.056). Of the several domains of cognitive functions assessed, verbal recognition and visual recall memory improved significantly (p < 0.05). But donepezil did not affect scores in the executive function tests. Our findings support a potential positive effect of AChEIs in the management of cognitive impairments in patients with chronic schizophrenia. Further studies with large subjects are needed to confirm our findings.     

Neuroleptic radioreceptor activity and clinical outcome in schizophrenia

The relationship between serum haloperidol concentration and clinical response was examined in 27 schizophrenic inpatients between the ages of 18 and 56 years. All patients were treated with haloperidol, 20 mg/day for the first 2 weeks. Dosage adjustment after 2 weeks of treatment was made in seven subjects based on poor clinical response or side effects. Haloperidol activity was determined by the radioreceptor assay for neuroleptics on weeks 2 and 4 serum samples. The results indicated that higher radioreceptor activity levels, particularly above 22 ng/ml, were associated with poorer clinical response. The data suggest that radioreceptor activity levels are not at a steady state after 2 weeks drug treatment. Additionally, problems secondary to low sensitivity of the radioreceptor assay may limit its utility at low serum concentrations.     

Prophylactic effect of neuroleptics in symptom-free schizophrenics: A comparative dose-response study of haloperidol and propericiazine

Remitted schizophrenic outpatients were treated in order to prevent relapse with three doses of haloperidol or propericiazine for 1 year in a double-blind controlled study employing a randomized design. The drug's ability to prevent relapse was evaluated by counting the number of symptom-free days for each patient before any sign of relapse or over-dose appeared. Patients were randomly assinged to the following drugs orally administered once per day at night: placebo; haloperidol 1 mg, 3 mg, and 6 mg; propericiazine 10 mg, 30 mg, and 60 mg. Serum prolactin levels in each patient were estimated by radioimmunoassay. All patients treated with placebo relapsed within 1 year and the relapse rate with placebo was significantly higher than with any dose of the two neuroleptics. Haloperidol increased the number of symptom-free days in a dose-dependent manner. Propericiazine at 10 mg and 30 mg also increased the number of symptom-free days dose-dependently but at 60 mg, the number decreased. It appears that propericiazine shows an inverted U-shaped dose-response curve. Prolactin levels were elevated dose-dependently by both drugs but failed to show a significant correlation with the number of symptom-free days. The present results indicate that haloperidol is superior to propericiazine from the viewpoint of the wider therapeutic window in maintenance treatment and antidopaminergic properties of neuroleptics, wherein it is important to prevent relapse even in remitted schizophrenics.     

Remoxipride in acute psychosis: Intramuscular followed by oral treatment compared to haloperidol,a doubleblind,multicenter trial

A double-blind, randomized, multicentre study comparing the efficacy and safety of intramuscular (i.m.) remoxipride to that of i.m. haloperidol was undertaken in 119 psychotic patients (mean age: 37 ± 13.4 years). The study period was 1 week i.m., followed by 3 weeks of oral treatment. Dosage was 200–600 mg/day for remoxipride and 10–30 mg/day for haloperidol during i.m. and 150–600 mg/day for remoxipride and 10–40 mg/day for haloperidol during oral treatment. Both drugs produced marked clinical improvements during i.m. and oral treatment. During the i.m. week, the median Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) total score decreased from 51 to 34 in the remoxipride group and from 53 to 38 in the haloperidol group. Over the 4-week treatment period, there was a significantly greater reduction in ‘some factors’ for remoxipride-treated patients when compared to haloperidol-treated patients. Somnolence was reported by 14% of haloperidol-treated patients during i.m. treatment. Akathisia and tremor occurred significantly less in remoxipride-treated patients as compared to haloperidol-treated patients. Intramuscularly administered remoxipride is as effective as haloperidol in reducing acute phase psychotic symptoms, and is associated with fewer extrapyramidal symptoms.     

Pharmacokinetics of haloperidol and fluphenazine decanoates in chronic schizophrenia

In a double-blind comparison of haloperidol decanoate and fluphenazine decanoate given 4-weekly for 60 weeks as maintenance therapy in 38 chronic schizophrenic in-patients, plasma haloperidol, fluphenazine and prolactin levels were measured at regular intervals by radioimmunoassay. After the first injection, the mean plasma haloperidol level was highest at week 1 and fell gradually towards week 4. Mean pre-dose haloperidol levels changed little after week 8. Results suggested an absorption half-life of 4 weeks, although, in three cases steady state was only achieved after 11 monthly injections. Steady state levels of both haloperidol and fluphenazine correlated highly with dose. In two subgroups observed at steady state, both drugs produced a biphasic pattern of plasma drug concentration between injections, a rapid rise on day 1 followed by stable elevated levels and a gradual return to pre-injection concentration by the end of week 4. In the fluphenazine subgroup there was a second peak on day 7 and a steeper decline, so that the mean area-under-curve in week 4 was 64% of that in week 1. Drug injections at steady state induced an increase in prolactin secretion in all of the fluphenazine sub-group and in half of those receiving haloperidol. Plasma prolactin changes resembled those for drug concentrations, but differences in times of peaks on day 1 resulted in weak correlations. Fluphenazine appeared more potent than haloperidol in provoking prolactin secretion.     

Placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the effects of proglumide in the treatment of schizophrenia.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study was performed to determine whether proglumide added to ongoing neuroleptic medication was efficacious in the treatment of 32 patients with persistent positive and negative schizophrenic symptoms. Patients treated with both proglumide and placebo showed a significant improvement over the 8 weeks of the study, but no significant difference between the patients taking proglumide and those taking placebo could be demonstrated. In addition, proglumide had no effect on plasma homovanillic acid concentrations or neuroleptic drug activity. The results suggest that, at least for the dose of proglumide used in this study (15 mg/day), the addition of this particular cholecystokinin antagonist does not potentiate the antipsychotic efficacy of neuroleptic medication in patients with persistent schizophrenic symptoms.     

Effects of risperidone and haloperidol on superoxide dismutase and nitric oxide in schizophrenia

Oxidative stress may be involved in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. No double-blind study has compared the effects of typical and atypical antipsychotics on both antioxidant enzyme activity and nitric oxide (NO) levels in schizophrenic patients. Seventy-eight inpatients with chronic schizophrenia were randomly assigned to 12 weeks of treatment with 6 mg/day of risperidone or 20 mg/day of haloperidol using a double-blind design. Clinical efficacy was determined using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale. Blood superoxide dismutase (SOD) and plasma NO levels were measured in patients and 30 normal controls. Our results showed that following a 2-week washout period, levels of SOD and NO were significantly increased in patients with schizophrenia compared to normal controls. Both risperidone and haloperidol equivalently reduced the elevated blood SOD levels in schizophrenia, but neither medication reduced the elevated plasma NO levels in schizophrenia. Low blood SOD levels at baseline predicted greater symptom improvement during treatment, and greater change in SOD was correlated with greater symptom improvement. These results suggest that both typical and atypical antipsychotic drugs may at least partially normalize abnormal free radical metabolism in schizophrenia, and some free radical parameters at baseline may predict antipsychotic responses of schizophrenic patients.     

Fluvoxamine dose-dependent interaction with haloperidol and the effects on negative symptoms in schizophrenia

Augmentation with low-dose fluvoxamine (50–100 mg/day) to antipsychotic treatment may improve the negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients, but involves a risk of drug-drug interaction. We studied the effects of fluvoxamine on plasma concentrations of haloperidol and reduced haloperidol, and their clinical symptoms, in haloperidol treated patients. Twelve schizophrenic inpatients with prevailingly negative symptoms receiving haloperidol 6 mg/day were additionally treated with incremental doses of fluvoxamine for 6 weeks (25, 75 and 150 mg/day for 2 weeks each). Plasma drug concentrations were monitored together with clinical assessments before and after each phase of the three fluvoxamine doses. Geometric mean of haloperidol concentrations during coadministration of fluvoxamine 25, 75 and 150 mg/day were 120% (95%CI; 114–127%), 139% (95%CI; 130–149%), and 160% (95%CI; 142–178%) of those before fluvoxamine coadministration, respectively. We found positive correlations between increase in plasma haloperidol concentrations and plasma fluvoxamine concentrations. Scores in negative symptoms were significantly reduced after fluvoxamine coadministration, whereas no changes were observed in the other psychiatric symptoms or any subgrouped side effects. Therefore, this study indicates that fluvoxamine increases plasma haloperidol concentrations in a dose-dependent manner. However, relatively small elevations in haloperidol concentration did not lead to the development of extrapyramidal symptoms under the conditions of this study.     

Fluoxetine in social phobia: a double-blind,placebo-controlled pilot study

The objective of the study was to examine the efficacy of fluoxetine in social phobia. Sixty subjects were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of double-blind therapy with either fluoxetine or placebo. Dose was fixed at 20 mg for fluoxetine during the first 8 weeks of double-blind treatment; during the final 6 weeks, the dose could be increased every two weeks by 20 mg to a maximum of 60 mg/day. An intentto-treat analysis was used. A significant change from baseline to endpoint was found for both fluoxetine and placebo on the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale. However, no significant difference was found between fluoxetine and placebo. The change for fluoxetine was somewhat lower than that found with other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, whereas the placebo response was greater. Fluoxetine failed to separate from placebo in this trial. It is unknown whether a larger dose for longer duration would have yielded separation from placebo. A higher than usual placebo response rate was found.     

Addition of lithium to haloperidol in non-affective,antipsychotic non-responsive schizophrenia: a double blind,placebo controlled,parallel design clinical trial

This double-blind placebo controlled, parallel design clinical trial compared the therapeutic effects of the addition of lithium or placebo to haloperidol in 21 seriously ill state hospital patients with DSM-III-R schizophrenia, who did not have concurrent affective disorders and who had not responded to previous trials of conventional antipsychotic medication. During a baseline period of 6 weeks, patients were switched to a stable dose of haloperidol (mean ± SD dose=13.6±8.1 mg/day). Patients were then randomized to receive either lithium or placebo in addition to haloperidol for 8 weeks (mean ± SD lithium level =0.98±0.13 mEq/1). Symptoms and side effects were assessed weekly. Improvement in symptoms correlated with the non-blind adjustment of antipsychotic dose, but not with lithium or placebo treatment. Side effects ratings did not differ between the two groups, but one patient developed a reversible delirium associated with combined lithium/haloperidol treatment. For these long-term, severely ill patients, combined treatment afforded no advantage over treatment with haloperidol alone.Supported by Grant MH 46700 from the National Institute for Mental Health. Lithium and lithium placebo capsules were supplied by Lilly Pharmaceuticals     

Acute mania: haloperidol dose and augmentation with lithium or lorazepam

Antipsychotic dosing for acute mania has not been well studied. Combined treatment with lithium and an antipsychotic is the most common treatment, but additional antimanic efficacy of a lithium-antipsychotic combination beyond that of an antipsychotic alone has not been well demonstrated. Furthermore, the possibility that lithium could affect antipsychotic dose requirement is believed to have never been studied. In this study, 63 acutely psychotic bipolar manic inpatients were randomly assigned to receive double-blind treatment with 1 of 2 haloperidol doses, 25 mg/day or 5 mg/day, for 21 days. In addition to haloperidol, subjects were randomly assigned to receive concomitant treatment with placebo, standard lithium, or lorazepam 4 mg/day. The high haloperidol dose produced greater improvement and more side effects than did the low dose. Lithium added to the low dose produced a markedly greater clinical response than did the low dose alone. Lorazepam did not improve the outcome for the patients receiving low-dose haloperidol. The clinical response produced by high-dose haloperidol was not enhanced by adding either lithium or lorazepam. All treatment effects emerged by the fourth day of treatment and persisted. Used alone, a haloperidol dose of 5 mg/day is too low for most manic patients, but concomitant lithium produces a dose-dependent enhancement of haloperidol response. Lorazepam 4 mg/day was insufficient to produce an advantage when added to low-dose haloperidol.     

Budesonide inhalation suspension: a review of its use in infants, children and adults with inflammatory respiratory disorders

Budesonide, a topically active corticosteroid, has a broad spectrum of clinically significant local anti-inflammatory effects in patients with inflammatory lung diseases including persistent asthma. In infants and young children with persistent asthma, day- and night-time symptom scores, and the number of days in which beta2-agonist bronchodilators were required, were significantly lower during randomised, double-blind treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 2 mg/day than placebo in 3 multicentre trials. Significantly fewer children discontinued therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension than with placebo because of worsening asthma symptoms in a study that included children who were receiving inhaled corticosteroids at baseline. Recent evidence indicates that budesonide inhalation suspension is significantly more effective than nebulised sodium cromoglycate in improving control of asthma in young children with persistent asthma. At a dosage of 2 mg/day, budesonide inhalation suspension significantly reduced the number of asthma exacerbations and requirements for systemic corticosteroids in preschool children with severe persistent asthma. In children with acute asthma or wheezing, the preparation was as effective as, or more effective than oral prednisolone in improving symptoms. In children with croup, single 2 or 4mg dosages of budesonide inhalation suspension were significantly more effective than placebo and as effective as oral dexamethasone 0.6 mg/kg or nebulised L-epinephrine (adrenaline) 4mg in alleviating croup symptoms and preventing or reducing the duration of hospitalisation. Early initiation of therapy with budesonide inhalation suspension 1 mg/day appears to reduce the need for mechanical ventilation and decrease overall corticosteroid usage in preterm very low birthweight infants at risk for chronic lung disease. In adults with persistent asthma, budesonide inhalation suspension < or =8 mg/day has been compared with inhaled budesonide 1.6 mg/day and fluticasone propionate 2 mg/day administered by metered dose inhaler. Greater improvements in asthma control occurred in patients during treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension than with budesonide via metered dose inhaler, whereas fluticasone propionate produced greater increases in morning peak expiratory flow rates than nebulised budesonide. Several small studies suggest that the preparation has an oral corticosteroid-sparing effect in adults with persistent asthma and that it may be as effective as oral corticosteroids during acute exacerbations of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The frequency of adverse events was similar in children receiving budesonide inhalation suspension 0.25 to 2 mg/day or placebo in 12-week studies. During treatment with budesonide inhalation suspension 0.5 to 1 mg/day in 3 nonblind 52-week studies, growth velocity in children was generally unaffected; however, a small but statistically significant decrease in growth velocity was detected in children who were not using inhaled corticosteroids prior to the introduction of budesonide inhalation suspension. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function was not affected by short (12 weeks) or long (52 weeks) term treatment with nebulised budesonide. In conclusion, budesonide inhalation suspension is the most widely available nebulised corticosteroid, and in the US is the only inhaled corticosteroid indicated in children aged > or =1 year with persistent asthma. The preparation is suitable for use in infants, children and adults with persistent asthma and in infants and children with croup.     

Randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of divalproex sodium in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic schizophrenia

Experimental and clinical data suggest that GABA-ergic drugs such as valproate may have a potential role in the treatment of schizophrenia. The authors designed a 21-day prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study of divalproex sodium as add-on treatment to haloperidol in 12 hospitalized patients with acute exacerbations of chronic schizophrenia. All patients received haloperidol 10 mg/day for 3 days and 15 mg/day for the remaining 18 days. In addition, five patients were randomly assigned to receive divalproex augmentation and seven to receive placebo. The divalproex dose was adjusted to a target serum concentration of 75 microg/mL for 2 weeks; placebo replaced divalproex during the third and last weeks to determine any carryover effect. Psychiatric rating scales were administered at baseline and on days 7, 14, and 21. Although the placebo group improved with haloperidol treatment, the divalproex group demonstrated greater improvement. On day 21, the divalproex group had greater improvement from baseline on the Clinical Global Impression Scale (p < or = 0.04), Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (p < or = 0.13), and Schedule for Assessment of Negative Symptoms scores (p < or = 0.007). After divalproex withdrawal on day 15, a carryover effect was observed during week 3. The authors concluded that the addition of divalproex sodium to standard antipsychotic drugs may prove effective in relieving the symptoms of acute schizophrenia. Future studies may benefit from the design of this pilot study. However, it is premature to apply this augmentation strategy in the clinical setting just yet because of the small sample size and the likely heterogeneity of the disorder.