Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen and CYFRA21-1 in patients with pathological stage I non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the prognostic value of serum tumor markers (carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CYFRA21-1) in patients with pathologic (p-) stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing complete resection. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-five patients (163 males, 112 females, mean age 67.1 years) with p-stage I NSCLC who underwent complete resection at our institution between April 1999 and October 2004 were examined. Patients who had received preoperative chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded, as were patients who had multiple malignancies including multiple lung cancer. The serum levels of tumor markers were measured using commercially available immunoassays within 1 month before surgical resection. Serum levels of CEA and CYFRA21-1 higher than 5.0 and 2.8 ng/ml, respectively, were considered as positive according to the manufacture's instructions. RESULTS: The histological classification was adenocarcinoma in 193 patients, squamous cell carcinoma in 71, large cell carcinoma in 5, and other histological type in 6. One hundred and fifty-seven patients had T1 disease and 118 patients had T2 disease. The positive ratio of CEA and CYFRA21-1 was 25.7% and 13.7%, respectively, and in relation to histological type was 27.8% and 7.8% in adenocarcinoma, and 20.6% and 28.4% in squamous cell carcinoma. The overall 5-year survival rate was 79.3%. With a median follow-up of 35.5 month for surviving patients, those with initial CYFRA21-1 serum levels higher than 2.8 ng/ml had a significantly worse prognosis (p=0.0041). Patients with an elevated preoperative CEA level exceeding 5.0 ng/ml had a shorter disease-free survival period (p=0.0003). In patients with adenocarcinoma, a CEA level above 5.0 ng/ml was associated with shorter survival and early recurrence, whereas CYFRA21-1 showed no such association. In patients with squamous cell carcinoma, elevated preoperative CEA was not related to survival and recurrence. In these patients, preoperative CYFRA21-1 level exceeding 2.8 ng/ml was associated with a poorer outcome, whereas preoperative CYFRA21-1 level was not associated with cancer recurrence. CONCLUSION: The patients with p-stage I adenocarcinoma whose preoperative CEA level was high might be considered as good candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy. The prognostic value of CYFRA21-1 could not be confirmed for stage I NSCLC, and preoperative CYFRA21-1 level was not useful in selecting the candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.     

Results of CEA-initiated second-look surgery for recurrent colorectal cancer

Seventy-five consecutive patients were followed up prospectively for a median of 24 months after resection of Dukes/Kirklin class B-2 or C colorectal cancers with serial plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values (a mean of 14 per patient) to assess the usefulness of CEA-initiated second-look surgery. Fifteen of 18 tumor recurrences in this group were first diagnosed at reexploration initiated after two successively increasing CEA values despite no other evidence of recurrence. Four of the 15 patients found to have tumor at second-look surgery were resected for cure, and 2 of these patients remain without evidence of disease 13 and 24 months later. Five patients whose recurrences could not be resected for cure were treated with partial tumor resection, regional infusion of chemotherapy, systemic chemotherapy or external beam radiotherapy. Four of these were alive at least 10 months later. Six patients found to have widespread regional or distant tumor recurrence were not treated at all and were dead 6 months after reexploration. Seven of the nine patients whose recurrences were considered resectable or treatable had rates of CEA increase of less than 2.1 ng/30 days. All six of the patients not treatable at second-look surgery had rates of postoperative CEA increase greater than 2.1 ng/30 days. The value of serial CEA as the earliest indicator of tumor recurrence in this group of patients was clear. The rate of postoperative plasma CEA increase after primary resection may help identify those patients most likely to benefit from second-look surgery.     

Use of CEA as an Indicator of Early Recurrence and as a Guide to a Selected Second-look Procedure in Patients with Colorectal Cancer

The usefulness of the CEA as an indicator of recurrence and a guide to selected second-look surgery was evaluated from a retrospective analysis of 358 patients with colorectal cancer and from a prospective experience with 16 patients all of whom had been admitted for second-look surgery because of postoperative elevations of CEA only. Our previous experience had shown that after curative resection the CEA usually returned to normal levels (less than 5 ng/ml) within one month, but became elevated at time of clinically obvious recurrence being very high in patients with liver metastases, but only moderately elevated or normal in patients with local recurrence. All 16 patients had previously had curative resection of colorectal cancer; 13 in the rectum or rectosigmoid and three in the right colon. There were 13 Dukes' C and three Dukes' B cancers. All had been followed clinically and by CEA testing at three monthly intervals and were considered free of disease (NED) at time of CEA elevation.

The median disease free interval was 13 months (range 4-57 months) and the median CEA prompting admission for second-look operation was 21 ng/ml (range 10-56 ng/ml). The sites of recurrence were liver in six, lung in two and localized disease in six. Two patients had negative exploration for recurrence and were found to have cholelithiasis only (one of these later died of metastases). Resection for cure was done in seven and palliative resection or biopsy only was done in nine patients. At this time, four patients are NED (12-37 months), five are living with disease (10-16 months) and seven have died of disease (2-12 months). The CEA test provides a method of early detection of recurrence and may permit surgical retrieval in selected patients and earlier initiation of palliation in other patients. The longterm effects in patient salvage remain to be defined.

     

Preoperative high CEA level in lung cancer patients: significant of measurement of serum CEA level among preoperative and postoperative course in long time observed patient]

We measured pre- and postoperative CEA level in 330 patients who underwent resection for lung cancer at Kyushu Cancer Center Hospital between 1983 and 1986 using RIA method. There were 93 patients with high preoperative serum CEA level above 5 ng/ml. The interrelationships among preoperative serum CEA level, prognostic factors, outcome, and postoperative change of CEA level were investigated in the 93 patients. Five-year survival rate of patients with preoperative serum CEA level ranging from 5.0 to 10.0 ng/ml (N = 53) was 60.0%, while that of patients with preoperative CEA level over 10.1 ng/ml (N = 40) was 24.6% (P less than 0.05). Recurrent rate was higher in patients with preoperative CEA level over 10.1 ng/ml, especially in those with lung cancer at stages I or II. However, patients with preoperative CEA level about 50 ng/ml, showed good outcome after curative resection. All 12 patients in whom postoperative serum CEA level did not return to normal died within 4 years, indicating that normalization of CEA level is an important factor in prognosis. This study indicates that among lung cancer patients with high serum CEA level, the preoperative CEA level and postoperative change of CEA level are apparently prognostic factors.     

Is carcino-embryonic antigen useful in the follow-up management of patients with colorectal liver metastases?

BACKGROUND: The role of carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in monitoring early detection of recurrent or metastatic colorectal cancer, and its impact on resectability rate and patient survival remains controversial. Our objective was to determine any association between the preoperative level of CEA and prognosis, and the resectability and survival by method of diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases. METHODS: We analyzed patients who underwent exploration for hepatic resection for metastatic colorectal cancer over a 15-year period. The patient population consisted of those patients who had undergone primary colon or rectal resection and were followed up with serial CEA levels and of patients who were followed up with physical examination, liver function tests (LFTs) or computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen and pelvis that led to the diagnosis of liver metastases. Also included in the study were patients who were diagnosed with liver metastases at the time of the primary colon or rectal resection and underwent planned hepatic resection at a later time. RESULTS: Three hundred and one (301) patients who underwent a total of 345 planned hepatic resections for metastatic colorectal cancer between January 1978 and December 1993 were included in this analysis. The median preoperative CEA level was 24.8 ng/mL in the resected group, 53.0 ng/mL in the incomplete resection group, and 49.1 ng/mL in the nonresected group (P = 0.02). More of the patients who had a preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL were in the resected group, while those who had a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL were likely to be in the nonresected group (P = 0.002). The median survival was 25 months for patients with a preoperative CEA level < or =30 ng/mL and 17 months for patients with a preoperative CEA >30 ng/mL (P = 0.0005). The resectability rate and the survival of patients by method of diagnosing liver metastases-rising CEA versus history and physical, elevated LFTs, CT scan versus diagnosis at the time of primary resection-was not significant (P = 0.06 and P = 0.19, respectively). Given the nonstandardized retrospective nature of the study cohort and relative small groups of patients, the power to detect small differences in survival by method of diagnosis is limited. In the complete resection group of patients with unilobar liver disease (5-year survival of 28.8%) there was no difference in survival between those patients who had normal preoperative CEA and those who had elevated preoperative CEA, and approximately 90% of them had an abnormal preoperative serum CEA level. CONCLUSIONS: CEA is useful in the preoperative evaluation of patients with hepatic colorectal metastases for assessing prognosis and is complimentary to history and physical examination in the diagnosis of liver metastases. Patients with colorectal liver metastases and preoperative CEA < or =30 ng/mL are more likely to be resectable, and they have the longest survival.     

Carcinoembryonic antigen testing after curative liver resection for synchronous liver metastasis of colorectal cancer: a Japanese multicenter analysis

Purpose

To identify the possible roles of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) testing after liver resection for synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (CLM).

Methods

The subjects of this retrospective study were patients who underwent complete resection of primary tumors and synchronous CLM between 1997 and 2007 at 20 institutions in Japan. We studied the associations between perioperative CEA levels and the characteristics of recurrence.

Results

Recurrence was detected during the median follow-up time of 52 months in 445 (73.7%) of the total 604 patients analyzed. A postoperative CEA level >5 ng/ml was an independent predictor, with the highest hazard ratio (2.25, 95% confidence interval 1.29–3.91, P = 0.004). A postoperative CEA level >5 ng/ml had a specificity of 86.2% and a positive predictive value of 84.2% for recurrence. Patients with a high postoperative CEA level had a significantly higher recurrence rate, with a shorter time until recurrence and a higher frequency of multiple metastatic sites than those with a low postoperative CEA level. Among the patients with recurrence, 173 (52.7%) had an elevated CEA level (>5 ng/ml) when recurrence was detected.

Conclusions

A postoperative CEA level >5 ng/ml was an independent predictor of recurrence; however, CEA testing was not a reliable surveillance tool to identity recurrence after liver resection.

     

The prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen in T1N1M0 and T2N1M0 non-small cell carcinoma of the lung.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the significance of preoperative clinicopathological factors, including serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), as well as postoperative clinicopathological factors in T1-2N1M0 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who underwent curative pulmonary resection. METHODS: Twenty T1N1M0 disease patients and 25 T2N1M0 patients underwent standard surgical procedures between September 1996 and December 2005, and were found to have non-small lung cancer. As prognostic factors, we retrospectively investigated age, sex, Brinkman index, histologic type, primary site, tumor diameter, clinical T factor, clinical N factor, pathological T factor, preoperative serum CEA levels, surgical procedure, visceral pleural involvement, and the status of lymph node involvement (level and number). RESULTS: The overall 5-year survival rate of all patients was 59.6%. In univariate analysis, survival was related to age (<70/>or=70 years, p=0.0079), site (peripheral/central, p=0.043), and CEA level (<5.0/>or=5.0 ng/ml, p=0.0015). However, in multivariate analysis, CEA (<5.0/>or=5.0 ng/ml) was the only independent prognostic factor; the 5-year survival of the patients with an elevated serum CEA level (>or=5.0 ng/ml) was only 33.2% compared to 79.9% in patients with a lower serum CEA level (<5.0 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: An elevated serum CEA level (>or=5.0 ng/ml) was an independent predictor of survival in pN1 patients except for T3 and T4 cases. Therefore, even in completely resected pN1 non-small cell lung cancer, patients with a high CEA level might be candidates for multimodal therapy.     

Prognostic value of postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen concentration and extent of invasion of resection margins after hepatic resection for colorectal metastases.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of postoperative concentration of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and extent of surgical margins after resection of liver metastases from colorectal cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Switzerland. SUBJECTS: 49 patients with hepatic metastases after primary colorectal cancer. INTERVENTIONS: Resection of hepatic metastases MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessment of prognostic value of variables by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Median survival was 24 months (range 5-86 months). Resection margins were clear (> 1-cm) in 10, close (< 1-cm) in 25 and invaded in 9 patients. On univariate analysis, a postoperative concentration of CEA of <4ng/ml was correlated with prolonged survival (p < 0.001), but the width of the resection margin was not of prognostic importance. There was no correlation between width of resection margins and postoperative concentration of CEA (p = 0.5). On multivariate analysis, postoperative concentrations of CEA of 4 ng/ml or more were associated with increased risk of death (relative risk 7.3; 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.8-18.7, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Postoperative CEA offers better prognostic discrimination than the width of resection margins after resection of liver metastases from colorectal tumours. Some patients with invaded resection margins did survive for 3 years, but no patient did whose CEA concentration was 4 ng/ml or more. The definition of a potentially curative hepatic resection should include a postoperative CEA concentration of <4 ng/ml (within the reference range).     

The clinical value of serum CA15-3 assay postoperatively in breast cancer patients

Serum carbohydrate antigen (CA15-3) values were examined in 300 normal subjects in order to determine the standard value of this antigen. The clinical relevance of repeatedly assaying this marker in patients with or without recurrent breast cancer postoperatively was compared with assaying the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values. The upper limit of CA15-3 was calculated as being 25.3 U/ml in the normal subjects and the distributions of CA15-3 values were not markedly different among the normal subjects, even if they had been selected according to sex or age. Moreover, no differences were observed among normal women who had been randomly selected according to the age distribution of the breast cancer patients. Thirty samples taken from the breast cancer patients postoperatively revealed values of higher than 25 U/ml and 73 samples showed lower levels. The serum CEA values were positive in 16 samples and negative in 85 samples. Although the accuracy of the CEA assay was about 10 per cent higher than that of the CA15-3 assay, its low positive rate was unsatisfactory for effective use in the breast clinic. The results of this study suggest that serum CA15-3 is not detectable unless there is a relatively large number of tumor cells. The higher false positive rate of the CA15-3 assay should therefore be considered as suggesting recurrence.     

The clinical value of serum CA15-3 assay postoperatively in breast cancer patients

Serum carbohydrate antigen (CA15-3) values were examined in 300 normal subjects in order to determine the standard value of this antigen. The clinical relevance of repeatedly assaying this marker in patients with or without recurrent breast cancer postoperatively was compared with assaying the serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) values. The upper limit of CA15-3 was calculated as being 25.3 U/ml in the normal subjects and the distributions of CA15-3 values were not markedly different among the normal subjects, even if they had been selected according to sex or age. Moreover, no differences were observed among normal women who had been randomly selected according to the age distribution of the breast cancer patients. Thirty samples taken from the breast cancer patients postoperatively revealed values of higher than 25 U/ml and 73 samples showed lower levels. The serum CEA values were positive in 16 samples and negative in 85 samples. Although the accuracy of the CEA assay was about 10 per cent higher than that of the CA15-3 assay, its low positive rate was unsatisfactory for effective use in the breast clinic. The results of this study suggest that serum CA15-3 is not detectable unless there is a relatively large number of tumor cells. The higher false positive rate of the CA15-3 assay should therefore be considered as suggesting recurrence.     

CEA Monitoring Among Patients in Multi-institutional Adjuvant G.I. Therapy Protocols

The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group (GITSG) has since 1975 included protocols for monitoring carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in its colorectal cancer adjuvant trials. Among the 563 patients on the colon cancer study (GI 6175) and the 207 patients on the rectal cancer study (GI 7175), one third had preoperative CEA determinations and more than 90% had some postoperative CEA monitoring. Colon cancer patients whose preoperative CEA was greater than 5 ng/ml had a greater probability of recurring than those whose values were lower (33% versus 18% recurrence with 21 months minimum follow-up; p < 0.05). The prognostic value of preoperative CEA was apparent only in patients with Dukes' C1 colon tumors. Preoperative CEA values were not of prognostic significance among the rectal adenocarcinoma patients. Although elevated levels of CEA after resection of either colon or rectum cancers were strongly associated with subsequent tumor recurrence, no single CEA value, arbitrarily defined as “elevated”, provided an adequate screening test with both high sensitivity and high specificity. Postoperative CEA elevations were more strongly predictive of recurrence when part of a steadily rising trend. In the colon cancer study, the median monthly increase in CEA for disease-free patients was estimated to be zero, and for the relapsed patients 5.8%. The corresponding estimates for patients on the rectal cancer protocol were zero and 7.8%. Only 36 of the 344 disease-free patients on the colon protocol and 14 of the 94 disease-free patients on the rectal protocol (15%) exhibited a rate of increase of CEA as high as 3% per month over the entire period of observation. Two thirds of the relapsed patients on both studies showed a rate of increase this high or higher. The patterns of CEA rise in individual patients were quite varied, however, and monthly rates of increase as established in our study are not to be used as guidelines in patient management.     

Carcinoembryonic antigen and prognosis in patients with colon cancer.

One-hundred and fifty patients with non-metastatic colo-rectal cancer were followed for a period of 24 to 36 months postoperatively. Preoperative CEA values have been shown to correlate with the extent of the disease and the patient's prognosis. The prognosis for recurrences is greater in patients with elevated pre-operative CEA values regardless of the stage of their disease. This tendency to have recurrences is 1.8 times higher in individuals with increased pre-operative CEA levels. This same relationship occurs to a greater or lesser extent at each stage of the disease.     

Surveillance with serial serum carcinoembryonic levels detect colorectal cancer recurrences in patients who are initial nonsecretors

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, elevated in a subgroup of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) at presentation, are serially followed as part of recommended surveillance after initial resection. The value of following serial CEA levels in patients who initially present with less than or normal levels of CEA (nonsecretors) is controversial. This study sought to determine the use of follow-up CEA levels in nonsecretors. A retrospective review was performed of patients with resected Stage I, II, and III CRC. We excluded patients who did not have a pretreatment CEA level, at least two follow-up CEA levels, or in whom CEA levels did not normalize after resection. The patients were grouped by initial CEA values: CEA 5 ng/mL or less (nonsecretors) and CEA 5 + ng/mL: (secretors). We identified 186 patients with CRC; 146 were initial nonsecretors. We identified 22 patients with recurrent colorectal cancer; 6 were secretors and 16 patients were nonsecretors. In the secretors group, CEA was elevated with recurrence in four (66%) of the patients. In the nonsecretors, CEA was elevated with recurrence in eight (50%) of the patients. In summary, many recurrences of CRC are marked by an elevation of CEA regardless of whether the patients initially presented as secretors or nonsecretors.     

Slope analysis of the postoperative CEA time course and its possible application as an aid in diagnosis of disease progression in gastrointestinal cancer

The postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) time courses of patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract were analyzed to establish a possible correlation with distinct types of disease progression. The diagnosis of tumor progression was obtained by second-look surgery, and in some cases by other clinical diagnostic procedures. In thirty-one of thirty-four patients studied, tumor progression correlated with increasing CEA levels. The calculation of the slopes of the CEA increase in the computerized CEA surveillance diagrams represented a parameter that discriminated between local tumor recurrence and widespread tumor dissemination. All localized tumor recurrences exhibited a flat slope in the range of 0.08 to 0.30 ng CEA increase/ml serum within ten days, with a mean value of 0.17 ng/ml in ten days. The CEA slopes in cases of liver metastases were relatively steep and ranged from 0.9 to 3.8 ng/ml in ten days, yielding a mean slope of 2.2 ng CEA increase/ml serum in ten days.     

Resection of the liver for colorectal carcinoma metastases: a multi-institutional study of patterns of recurrence

The Registry of Hepatic Metastases has collected data on consecutive patients from 24 institutions who have undergone hepatic resection for colorectal carcinoma metastases. Patterns of recurrence were examined in a subgroup of 607 patients who had undergone curative resection of isolated hepatic metastases. Forty-three percent of these patient have had recurrences in the liver and 31% have had recurrences in the lung (either alone or in combination with other organs). A multivariate analysis showed that patients with positive pathologic margins or bilobar metastases were at an increased risk of having a recurrence in the liver (68% and 64%, respectively). We conclude that: hepatic resection effectively controls hepatic tumor in a substantial number of patients, adjuvant therapy after hepatic resection should be directed at both the lung and liver to significantly increase survival, and patients with positive pathologic margins or bilobar metastases are at an increased risk for hepatic recurrence.     

Serum carcinoembryonic antigen level in non-small-cell lung cancer patients with preoperative normal serum level

Objective  The prognostic significance of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a normal serum CEA level (<5.0 ng/ml) was examined. Methods  A total of 220 consecutive NSCLC patients with preoperative normal serum CEA levels were included. Patients were subdivided into two groups: preoperative serum CEA level ≥2.5 and <2.5 ng/ml. Results  The 5-year survival of patients with preoperative serum CEA level less and more than 2.5 ng/ml were 79.62% and 62.0%, respectively (P = 0.0036). Multivariate analysis indicated that a preoperative serum CEA level of ≥2.5 ng/ml was an independent prognostic factor. Similar results were found in patients with adenocarcinoma but not found in others. Conclusion  NSCLC patients with a high serum CEA level, especially adenocarcinoma patients, had poorer prognosis even if their serum CEA levels were within the normal upper limit.     

Chromogranin A,a Marker of the Therapeutic Success of Resection of Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases: Preliminary Report

Recent publications indicate that life may be prolonged by surgical debulking of neuroendocrine tumors. A minimum 90% reduction of liver metastases has been suggested to alleviate symptoms of the carcinoid. We have used the tumor marker chromogranin A (CgA) to assess hepatic resection in patients with neuroendocrine metastatic tumor disease. Since 1998, seven patients (3 men) of median age 73 years (range 64–84 years) with carcinoid primary tumors in the ileum who had solitary (n = 2) or multiple (n = 5) liver metastases underwent hepatic resections. Two patients had synchronous small intestinal and liver resections; the rest had deferred hepatic resections after intestinal resection. Hormonal manifestations in the form of loose stools or diarrhea or flushing were observed in five patients, and five had abdominal symptoms from partial obstruction of the small bowel. The resection was deemed radical in five patients. Two patients with non-radical resection needed postoperative octreotide treatment, and symptoms were alleviated or improved in the others. All seven patients are alive with an observation period from 6 to 64 months (median 36 months). Median CgA (normal < 30 ng/ml) was 292 ng/ml (range 79-14,000 ng/ml) before liver surgery. Postoperatively, CgA became normal in three of the radically resected patients, whereas in two others, it decreased to a lowest median level of 79 ng/ml (range 52–105 ng/ml). In two palliatively resected patients, one had a near normalization to 65 ng/ml, and the last patient had a reduction from 14,000 to 2400 ng/ml following debulking surgery. A similar postoperative reduction was noted for 24 hr urinary 5-HIAA excretion. Postoperative octreotide scintigraphy suggested residual hepatic or extrahepatic tumors in three of the patients thought radically resected, whereas two had no clear sign of disease corresponding to a normal CgA value. The CgA values, however, reflected the extent of positive scintigraphy findings. Serum CgA levels monitored the extent and short-term course of the disease and corresponded well with scintigraphy findings and 5-HIAA excretion, but prolonged follow-up in more patients may be necessary before decisive conclusions are allowed to be drawn.     

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels of peripheral and portal blood and tumor histopathology in colorectal cancer

Correlation between CEA levels of peripheral and portal blood and 9 histopathologic variables were examined in 66 patients with colorectal cancer. CEA levels of portal blood (mean 26.6ng/ml and positive rate more than 5ng/ml, 59.1%) were significantly higher than those (8.1ng/ml and 33.3%) of peripheral blood. Elevation of CEA levels in portal and peripheral blood were most highly correlated with the grade of vein invasion and its location in the layer of colorectal wall, although the levels were related to the other 8 histopathologic variables such as tumor size, the grade of node metastases, Dukes stage and so on. CEA levels of portal blood elevated from 19.4ng/ml and 40% to 43.6ng/ml and 90.2% respectively following operative stimuli to cancer lesions with vein invasion, but the levels did not elevated in the lesions without its invasion. CEA levels of peripheral blood were as low as 5ng/ml in 3 out of 8 patients with liver metastases. However, the levels in portal blood were much higher than 5ng/ml in all the patients. These results suggested that CEA might be hematogenously drained by portal system from cancer cells in the invasive veins, but not by thoracic duct of lymphatic system, and also that the measurement of CEA in portal blood might be available to predict the vein invasion of cancer lesions and liver metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.     

Plasma DNA is more reliable than carcinoembryonic antigen for diagnosis of recurrent esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND: Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and plasma DNA are known to be elevated in patients with esophageal cancer and are higher in patients with disseminated disease. The sensitivity and specificity of these markers in the diagnosis of recurrent esophageal cancer have not been compared. STUDY DESIGN: Plasma DNA was measured using polymerase chain reaction in 45 patients with esophageal cancer and 44 asymptomatic volunteers. The 95(th) percentile (19 ng /mL) in the volunteers was used to define normal. Thirty-nine patients had localized cancer and underwent resection, and six had disseminated disease at operation. Plasma DNA was measured preoperatively in all patients, with serum CEA measured in 31. Plasma DNA was measured sequentially during followup in 21 patients, including 7 who developed recurrence. CEA was measured in 14 of 21 patients who had sequential plasma DNA measured and in 6 of 7 patients with recurrence. CEA levels greater than 5.0 ng/mL were used as cut-off. RESULTS: Plasma DNA was more sensitive than CEA for detecting unresectable esophageal cancer (100% versus 40%), but it had a lower specificity (22% versus 89%).The positive predictive value (19% versus 40%) and negative predictive value (100% versus 89%) were similar for plasma DNA and serum CEA, respectively. Plasma DNA was also more sensitive than CEA in detecting recurrent esophageal cancer (100% versus 33%). The specificity and positive predictive values were 100% for both tests, but the negative predictive values were higher for plasma DNA. Plasma DNA rose before there was clinical evidence of recurrence in 67% compared with only 17% for CEA. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma DNA is an extremely reliable indicator of the presence of recurrent disease, and, in the majority of patients, it rises before clinical evidence of recurrence. In contrast, a normal CEA should be interpreted cautiously, because it does not exclude recurrent disease.     

Plasma levels of CEA as a prognostic marker in carcinoma of urinary bladder.

Plasma carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels were performed preoperatively by radioimmunoassay in 124 patients with histologically proved bladder carcinoma. The level of CEA was used to determine its prognostic value in patients with bladder cancer. The correlation of CEA levels with the stage of the disease, histology, and resectability was also studied. Values above 2.5 ng/ml were taken as abnormal. Active disease was associated with high CEA levels. All patients with CEA levels greater than 10 ng/ml died in less than 1 1/2 years, while all patients who survived 1 1/2-3 years had preoperative CEA levels less than 10 ng/ml. There was a prognostic significance for patients with transitional cell or squamous cell carcinoma. All patients with squamous cell carcinoma had CEA levels less than or equal to 10 ng/ml, and all patients with transitional carcinoma had preoperative CEA values greater than 10 ng/ml. A correlation between CEA levels and resectability of the primary tumor was found. This study indicates that, in bladder carcinoma patients, preoperative CEA levels greater than 10 ng/ml are of prognostic value, since all of these patients have died and all of the long-term survivors had levels of less than or equal to 10 ng/ml.