Follow-up loss in smoking cessation consultation: can we predict and prevent it?

BackgroundCigarette smoking has a considerable health and economic burden in modern society, with increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Therefore, smoking cessation policies and medical treatments are essential. However, cessation rates are low and the abandonment of the consultation is common. The identification of characteristics that may predict adherence will help defining the best treatment strategy. This study aimed to identify predictors of follow-up loss in smoking cessation consultation.MethodsWe made a retrospective observational study, including a cohort of patients who started smoking cessation consultation (April-December 2018). Clinical data from consultations was collected and analyzed with IBM SPSS Statistics (SPSS, RRID:SCR_002865).ResultsA total of 175 patients was selected (41.1% female), with a mean age of 53±12 years. Eighty-five patients (48.6%) were discharged for abandonment. They had a median pack-year unit 38±36 (P=0.011), Fagerström and Richmond scores of 5±2 and 7±2, respectively. There was an association between women (P<0.001), younger age (P<0.001), depression/anxiety (P=0.023), lower smoking load (P=0.019), starting the treatment in the first appointment (P=0.004) and the abandonment of the consultation. In binary logistic regression, younger age (less than 50 years) (OR =4.39; 95% CI: 1.99–9.70), starting the treatment in the first appointment (OR =3.04; 95% CI: 1.44–6.42) and depression/anxiety (OR =2.30; 95% CI: 1.08–4.88) remained independent predictors of loss in follow-up.ConclusionsWomen, younger age, depression/anxiety, lower smoking load and starting treatment in the first appointment are predictors of follow-up loss, so, these patients may benefit from more frequent evaluations and intensive cognitive approach. This study also raises awareness about the adequate timing to start pharmacological support for smoking cessation.     

Dietary Patterns and Risk for Metabolic Syndrome in Korean Women: A Cross-Sectional Study

Dietary patterns are a risk factor for metabolic syndrome (MetS). The prevalence of MetS has increased in Korea, and this condition has become a public health issue. Therefore, the present cross-sectional study aimed to identify the associations between dietary patterns and the risk of MetS among Korean women.The data of 5189 participants were analyzed to determine dietary intake and lifestyle. A principal components analysis was employed to determine participant dietary patterns with regard to 106 food items. MetS was diagnosed using the National Cholesterol Education Program, Adult Treatment Panel III. Logistic regression analyses were applied to evaluate the associations between dietary pattern quintiles and MetS and to generate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after adjusting for potential confounders.Three dietary patterns were identified: “traditional,” “western,” and “prudent.” The “prudent” dietary pattern consisted of a high intake of fruits and fruit products as well as nuts, dairy, and a low consumption of grains; this pattern was negatively associated with the risk of MetS. The highest quintile of the “prudent” dietary pattern was significantly less likely to develop MetS (OR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.36–0.68, P for trend <0.001) compared with the lowest quintile. This pattern was also negatively associated with all of the MetS diagnostic criteria: abdominal obesity (OR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41–0.65), blood pressure (OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.59–0.87), triglycerides (OR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85), fasting glucose (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.43–0.95), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.42–0.68). However, the “traditional” and “western” dietary patterns were not associated with the risk of MetS.The “prudent” dietary pattern was negatively associated with the risk of developing MetS among Korean women.     

Evaluating the efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus the optimal drug therapy (ODT) for stable coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundMany studies have reported potential benefits of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) versus optimal drug therapy (ODT) for patients with stable coronary heart disease but with inconsistent results. To examine this, an explicit systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to compared the clinical outcomes of PCI and ODT in these patients.MethodsThe following terms were combined to search relative articles through databases PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and Web of Science published from January 2010 to November 2021 according to Participants, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study (PICOS) criteria: “coronary heart disease”, “stable coronary heart disease”, “stable angina pectoris”, “percutaneous coronary intervention”, “PCI”, “percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty”, “drug therapy”, “optimized drug treatment”, and “optimized drug therapy”. The meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.2, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies.ResultsA total of 12 articles were included in the final analysis. There were 4,288 cases of PCI patients and 4,261 cases of ODT patients. The results showed that, when comparing PCI with ODT, there was a significant difference in the probability of myocardial infarction [relative risk (RR) =0.63; 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.45–0.90] and the patient mortality (RR =0.51; 95% CI: 0.40–0.64). However, there was no significant difference in the prevalence of stroke (RR =1.33; 95% CI: 0.82–2.17), revascularization (RR =0.86; 95% CI: 0.46–1.62) and patient quality of life (MD =10.44; 95% CI: −1.84 to 22.73). Performance bias and detection bias were all unclear in the included studies and should be warned.DiscussionCompared with ODT, PCI reduced the mortality and myocardial infarction rate of patients with CTO or severe coronary artery stenosis. However, the incidence of stroke, revascularization, and quality of life of patients were not significant different between PCI and ODT. Performance bias and detection bias should be cautioned.     

Predictors of High Motivation Score for Performing Research Initiation Fellowship,Master 1, Research Master 2, and PhD Curricula During Medical Studies: A Strobe-Compliant Article

Translational research plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between fundamental and clinical research. The importance of integrating research training into medical education has been emphasized. Predictive factors that help to identify the most motivated medical students to perform academic research are unknown. In a cross-sectional study on a representative sample of 315 medical students, residents and attending physicians, using a comprehensive structured questionnaire we assessed motivations and obstacles to perform academic research curricula (ie, research initiation fellowship, Master 1, Research Master 2, and PhD). Independent predictive factors associated with high “motivation score” (top quartile on motivation score ranging from 0 to 10) to enroll in academic research curricula were derived using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Independent predictors of high motivation score for performing Master 1 curriculum were: “considering that the integration of translational research in medical curriculum is essential” (OR, 3.79; 95% CI, 1.49–9.59; P = 0.005) and “knowledge of at least 2 research units within the university” (OR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.01–6.47; P < 0.0001). Independent predictors of high motivation score for performing Research Master 2 curriculum were: “attending physician” (OR, 4.60; 95% CI, 1.86–11.37; P = 0.001); “considering that the integration of translational research in medical curriculum is essential” (OR, 4.12; 95% CI, 1.51–11.23; P = 0.006); “knowledge of at least 2 research units within the university” (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.91–6.46; P = 0.0001); and “male gender” (OR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.02–3.25; P = 0.04). Independent predictors of high motivation score for performing PhD curriculum were: “considering that the integration of translational research in medical curriculum is essential” (OR, 5.94; 95% CI, 2.33–15.19; P = 0.0002) and “knowledge of at least 2 research units within the university” (OR, 2.63; 95% CI, 1.46–4.77; P = 0.001). This is the first study that has identified factors determining motivations and barriers to carry out academic research curricula among undergraduate and postgraduate medical students. Improving these 2 areas will certainly have an impact on a better involvement of the next generation of physicians in translational medicine.     

Risk factors for cardiac rupture after acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during the percutaneous coronary intervention era: a retrospective case-control study

BackgroundIn percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) era, more clinically valuable risk factors are still needed to determine the occurrence of cardiac rupture (CR). Therefore, we aimed to provide evidence for the early identification of CR in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).MethodsA total of 22,016 consecutive patients with STEMI admitted to Cangzhou Central Hospital and Tianjin Chest Hospital from January 2013 to July 2021 were retrospectively included, among which 195 patients with CR were included as CR group. From the rest 21,820 STEMI patients without CR, 390 patients at a ratio of 1:2 were included as the control group. A total of 66 patients accepted PCI in the CR group, and 132 patients who accepted PCI in the control group at a ratio of 1:2 were included. The status of first medical contact, laboratory examinations, and PCI characteristics were recorded. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the risk factors related to CR.ResultsThere was a higher proportion of patients with myocardial infarction (MI) in the high lateral wall in the CR group (23.6% vs. 8.2%, P<0.001). The proportion of single lesions was lower in the CR group (24.2% vs. 45.5%, P=0.004). Female (OR =2.318, 95% CI: 1.431–3.754, P=0.001), age (OR =1.066, 95% CI: 1.041–1.093, P<0.001), smoking (OR =1.750, 95% CI: 1.086–2.820, P=0.022), total chest pain time (OR =1.017, 95% CI: 1.000–1.035, P=0.049), recurrent acute chest pain (OR =2.750, 95% CI: 1.535–4.927, P=0.001), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the high lateral wall indicated by ECG (OR =5.527, 95% CI: 2.798–10.918, P<0.001), acute heart failure (OR =3.585, 95% CI: 2.074–6.195, P<0.001), and NT-proBNP level (OR =1.000, 95% CI: 1.000–1.000, P=0.023) were risk factors for CR in all patients. In patients who accepted PCI, single lesion (OR =0.421, 95% CI: 0.204–0.867, P=0.019), preoperative thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade (OR =0.358, 95% CI: 0.169–0.760, P=0.007), and postoperative TIMI grade (OR =0.222, 95% CI: 0.090–0.546, P=0.001) were risk factors for CR.ConclusionsNon-single lesions and preoperative and postoperative TIMI grades were risk factors for CR in patients who accepted PCI. In addition to previously reported indicators, we found that AMI in the high lateral wall maybe helpful in early and accurate identification and prevention of possible CR.     

Is Lone Hypertension a Risk Factor for More Severe COVID-19 Outcomes?

Background:Based on current evidence, it is not clear whether lone hypertension increases the risk for severe illness from COVID-19, or if increased risk is mainly associated with age, obesity and diabetes. The objective of the study was to evaluate whether lone hypertension is associated with increase mortality or a more severe course of COVID-19, and if treatment and control of hypertension mitigates this risk.Methods:This is a prospective multi-center observational cohort study with 30-day outcomes of 9,531 consecutive SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive patients ≥ 18 years old (41.9 ± 9.7 years, 49.2% male), Uzbekistan, June 1-September 30, 2020. Patients were subclassified according to JNC8 criteria into six blood pressure stages. Univariable and multiple logistic regression was conducted to examine how variables predict outcomes.Results:The 30-days all-cause mortality was 1.18% (n = 112) in the whole cohort. After adjusting for age, sex, history of myocardial infarction (MI), type-2 diabetes, and obesity, none of six JNC8 groups showed any significant difference in all-cause mortality. However, age was associated with an increased risk of 30-days all-cause mortality (OR = 1.09, 95%CI [1.07–1.12], p < 0.001), obesity (OR = 7.18, 95% CI [4.18–12.44], p < 0.001), diabetes (OR 4.18, 95% CI [2.58–6.76], p < 0.001), and history of MI (OR = 2.68, 95% CI [1.67–4.31], p < 0.001). In the sensitivity test, being ≥ 65 years old increased mortality 10.56-fold (95% CI [5.89–18.92], p < 0.001). Hospital admission was 12.4% (n = 1,183), ICU admission 1.38% (n = 132). The odds of hospitalization increased having stage-2 untreated hypertension (OR = 4.51, 95%CI [3.21–6.32], p < 0.001), stage-1 untreated hypertension (OR = 1.97, 95%CI [1.52–2.56], p < 0.001), and elevated blood pressure (OR = 1.82, 95% CI [1.42–2.34], p < 0.001). Neither stage-1 nor stage-2 treated hypertension patients were at statistically significant increased risk for hospitalization after adjusting for confounders. Presenting with stage-2 untreated hypertension increased the odds of ICU admission (OR = 3.05, 95 %CI [1.57–5.93], p = 0.001).Conclusions:Lone hypertension did not increase COVID-19 mortality or in treated patients risk of hospitalization.     

Testimonial Injustice: Linguistic Bias in the Medical Records of Black Patients and Women

BackgroundBlack Americans and women report feeling doubted or dismissed by health professionals.ObjectiveTo identify linguistic mechanisms by which physicians communicate disbelief of patients in medical records and then to explore racial and gender differences in the use of such language.DesignCross-sectional.Setting/ParticipantsAll notes for patients seen in an academic ambulatory internal medicine practice in 2017.Main MeasuresA content analysis of 600 clinic notes revealed three linguistic features suggesting disbelief: (1) quotes (e.g., had a “reaction” to the medication); (2) specific “judgment words” that suggest doubt (e.g., “claims” or “insists”); and (3) evidentials, a sentence construction in which patients’ symptoms or experience is reported as hearsay. We used natural language processing to evaluate the prevalence of these features in the remaining notes and tested differences by race and gender, using mixed-effects regression to account for clustering of notes within patients and providers.Key ResultsOur sample included 9251 notes written by 165 physicians about 3374 unique patients. Most patients were identified as Black (74%) and female (58%). Notes written about Black patients had higher odds of containing at least one quote (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.20–1.83) and at least one judgment word (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.02–1.53), and used more evidentials (β 0.32, 95% CI 0.17–0.47), compared to notes of White patients. Notes about female vs. male patients did not differ in terms of judgment words or evidentials but had a higher odds of containing at least one quote (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05–1.44).ConclusionsBlack patients may be subject to systematic bias in physicians’ perceptions of their credibility, a form of testimonial injustice. This is another potential mechanism for racial disparities in healthcare quality that should be further investigated and addressed.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-06682-z.     

Are Veterans Getting Their Preferred Depression Treatment? A National Observational Study in the Veterans Health Administration

BackgroundPhysician responsiveness to patient preferences for depression treatment may improve treatment adherence and clinical outcomes.ObjectiveTo examine associations of patient treatment preferences with types of depression treatment received and treatment adherence among Veterans initiating depression treatment.DesignPatient self-report surveys at treatment initiation linked to medical records.SettingVeterans Health Administration (VA) clinics nationally, 2018–2020.ParticipantsA total of 2582 patients (76.7% male, mean age 48.7 years, 62.3% Non-Hispanic White)Main MeasuresPatient self-reported preferences for medication and psychotherapy on 0–10 self-anchoring visual analog scales (0=“completely unwilling”; 10=“completely willing”). Treatment receipt and adherence (refilling medications; attending 3+ psychotherapy sessions) over 3 months. Logistic regression models controlled for socio-demographics and geographic variables.Key ResultsMore patients reported strong preferences (10/10) for psychotherapy than medication (51.2% versus 36.7%, McNemar χ²₁=175.3, p<0.001). A total of 32.1% of patients who preferred (7–10/10) medication and 21.8% who preferred psychotherapy did not receive these treatments. Patients who strongly preferred medication were substantially more likely to receive medication than those who had strong negative preferences (odds ratios [OR]=17.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]=12.5–24.5). Compared with patients who had strong negative psychotherapy preferences, those with strong psychotherapy preferences were about twice as likely to receive psychotherapy (OR=1.9; 95% CI=1.0–3.5). Patients who strongly preferred psychotherapy were more likely to adhere to psychotherapy than those with strong negative preferences (OR=3.3; 95% CI=1.4–7.4). Treatment preferences were not associated with medication or combined treatment adherence. Patients in primary care settings had lower odds of receiving (but not adhering to) psychotherapy than patients in specialty mental health settings. Depression severity was not associated with treatment receipt or adherence.ConclusionsMismatches between treatment preferences and treatment type received were common and associated with worse treatment adherence for psychotherapy. Future research could examine ways to decrease mismatch between patient preferences and treatments received and potential effects on patient outcomes.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-07136-2.KEY WORDS: major depression, treatment preferences, treatment adherence, Veterans     

Interest of anatomical segmentectomy over lobectomy for lung cancer: a nationwide study

BackgroundAnatomical segmentectomy is an alternative to lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer (LC) or in patients at high risk. The main objective of this study was to compare the morbidity and mortality associated with these two types of pulmonary resection using data from the French National Epithor database.MethodsAll patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy for early-stage LC from January 1^st 2014 to December 31^st 2016 were identified in the Epithor database. The primary endpoint was morbidity; the secondary endpoint was postoperative mortality. Propensity score matching was implemented and used to balance groups. The results were reported as odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).ResultsDuring the study period, 1,604 segmentectomies (9.78%) and 14,786 lobectomies (90.22%) were performed. After matching, the segmentectomy group experienced significantly less atelectasis (OR 0.54; 95% CI: 0.4–0.75, P<0.0001), pneumonia (OR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55–0.95, P=0.02), prolonged air leaks (OR 0.75; 95% CI: 0.64–0.89, P=0.001) or bronchopleural fistula (OR 0.35; 95% CI: 0.14–0.83, P=0.017), and fewer patients had at least one complication (OR 0.7; 95% CI: 0.62–0.78, P<0.0001). According to the Clavien-Dindo classification, postoperative complications were significantly less severe in the segmentectomy group (OR 0.52; 95% CI: 0.37–0.74, P<0.0001). There was no significant difference in postoperative mortality at 30 days (OR 0.67; 95% CI: 0.38–1.20, P=0.18), 60 days (OR 0.78; 95% CI: 0.42–1.47, P=0.4), or 90 days (OR 0.77; 95% CI: 0.45–1.34, P=0.36).ConclusionsAnatomical segmentectomy is an alternative surgical approach that could reduce postoperative morbidity, but it does not appear to affect mortality.     

Incidence of readmission to the ICU after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundDue to the complexity of cardiac surgery, almost all patients need to be admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for postoperative care after surgery. After being discharged from the ICU, some patients need to be readmitted due to disease deterioration during hospitalization. We conducted a meta-analysis of the literature to investigate the incidence of readmission to the ICU in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.MethodsThe PubMed, Medline, and Elsevier databases were searched using the keywords “cardiac surgery,” “readmission,” “intensive care unit,” and “ICU” to retrieve English-language articles published from January 2000 to January 2021. The articles were screened, and their quality was evaluated. A meta-analysis was performed on the outcomes of patients after readmission to the ICU using Stata16.0 software.ResultsUltimately, 9 articles were included in the meta-analysis, comprising 32,825 cardiac surgery cases, of whom 1,302 were readmitted to the ICU. The incidence of readmission to the ICU was 3.97%. Among the direct reasons for readmission to the ICU, respiratory failure accounted for 13.6–48.6%, while hemodynamic instability accounted for 21.6–51.9%. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the mortality rate of patients readmitted to the ICU was significantly higher than that of patients not readmitted to the ICU [risk difference (RD) =8.05, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.10–12.69, Z=8.965; P<0.0001], as was the length of hospital stay [standard mean difference (SMD) =3.17, 95% CI: 1.40–4.94, Z=3.504; P<0.001], and the incidence of complications (odds ratio =1.97, 95% CI: 1.35–2.87, Z=3.507; P<0.001).ConclusionsNine articles were included in this meta-analysis on the incidence rate of readmission to the ICU of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The results showed that the proportion of readmission to the ICU was 3.97%. Patients readmitted to the ICU had a higher rate of complications, longer hospital stay, and higher mortality rate than those not readmitted.     

Papel dos Níveis de Sódio na Fibrilação Atrial na Insuficiência Cardíaca: Jogador Ativo ou Bystander?

BackgroundThe coexistence of hyponatremia and atrial fibrillation (AF) increases morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). However, it is not established whether hyponatremia is related to AF or not.ObjectiveOur study aims to seek a potential association of hyponatremia with AF in patients with reduced ejection fraction heart failure (HFrEF).MethodsThis observational cross-sectional single-center study included 280 consecutive outpatients diagnosed with HFrEF with 40% or less. Based on sodium concentrations ≤135 mEq/L or higher, the patients were classified into hyponatremia (n=66) and normonatremia (n=214). A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.ResultsMean age was 67.6±10.5 years, 202 of them (72.2%) were male, mean blood sodium level was 138±3.6 mEq/L, and mean ejection fraction was 30±4%. Of those, 195 (69.6%) patients were diagnosed with coronary artery disease. AF was detected in 124 (44.3%) patients. AF rate was higher in patients with hyponatremia compared to those with normonatremia (n=39 [59.1%] vs. n=85 [39.7%), p= 0.020). In the logistic regression analysis, hyponatremia was not related to AF (OR=1.022, 95% CI=0.785–1.330, p=0.871). Advanced age (OR=1.046, 95% CI=1.016–1.177, p=0.003), presence of CAD (OR=2.058, 95% CI=1.122–3.777, p=0.020), resting heart rate (OR=1.041, 95% CI=1.023–1.060, p<0.001), and left atrium diameter (OR=1.049, 95% CI=1.011–1.616, p=0.002) were found to be predictors of AF.ConclusionAF was higher in outpatients with HFrEF and hyponatremia. However, there is no association between sodium levels and AF in patients with HFrEF.     

Effect of hospital case volume on clinical outcomes of patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a territory-wide longitudinal observational study

BackgroundThe utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has increased rapidly around the world. Being an overall low-volume high-cost form of therapy, the effectiveness of having care delivered in segregated units across a geographical locality is debatable.MethodsAll adult extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases admitted to public hospitals in Hong Kong between 2010 and 2019 were included. “High-volume” centers were defined as those with >20 extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases in the respective calendar year, while “low-volume” centers were those with ≤20. Clinical outcomes of patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation care in high-volume centers were compared with those in low-volume centers.ResultsA total of 911 patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—297 (32.6%) veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, 450 (49.4%) veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, and 164 (18.0%) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation-cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The overall hospital mortality was 456 (50.1%). The annual number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases in high- and low-volume centers were 29 and 11, respectively. Management in a high-volume center was not significantly associated with hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61–1.21, P=0.38), or with intensive care unit mortality (adjusted OR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.54–1.06, P=0.10) compared with a low-volume center. Over the 10-year period, the overall observed mortality was similar to the Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation IV-predicted mortality, with no significant difference in the standardized mortality ratios between high- and low-volume centers (P=0.46).ConclusionsIn a territory-wide observational study, we observed that case volumes in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation centers were not associated with hospital mortality. Maintaining standards of care in low-volume centers is important and improves preparedness for surges in demand.     

Length of Menstrual Cycle and Risk of Endometriosis: A Meta-Analysis of 11 Case–Control Studies

Endometriosis is a complex disease that affects a large number of women worldwide and may cause pain and infertility.To systematically review published studies evaluating the relationship between menstrual cycle length and risk of endometriosis.We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE in databases in July 2014 using the keywords “case–control studies,” “epidemiologic determinants,” “risk factors,” “menstrual cycle,” “menstrual length,” “menstrual character,” and “endometriosis.”We included case–control studies published in English that investigated cases of surgically confirmed endometriosis and examined the relationship between endometriosis risk and menstrual cycle.Eleven articles that met the inclusion criteria included data of 3392 women with endometriosis and 5006 controls. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used for the evaluation.For the association of risk of endometriosis and menstrual cycle length shorter than or equal to 27 days (SEQ27) or length longer than or equal to 29 days (LEQ29), the odds ratio was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05–1.43) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.48–0.96), respectively.In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that menstrual cycle length SEQ27 increase the risk of endometriosis and cycle length LEQ29 decrease the risk.     

Elevated serum lipoprotein(a) is significantly associated with angiographic progression of coronary artery disease

BackgroundLipoprotein(a)[Lp(a)] has been considered as an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD). The present study aimed to evaluate the association between baseline serum Lp(a) and CAD progression determined by angiographic score.MethodsA total of 814 patients who had undergone two or more coronary computed tomography angiography at least 6 months apart were consecutively enrolled and the coronary severity was determined by the Gensini score system. Patients were stratified into two groups according to Lp(a)>300 mg/L and Lp(a) ≤ 300 mg/L or classified as “progressors” and “non‐progressors” based on the Gensini score rate of change per year. The association of continuous Lp(a) and Lp(a)>300 mg/L with CAD progression were respectively assessed by logistic regression analysis. Moreover, further evaluation of those association was performed in subgroups of the study population.ResultsPatients in the “progressors” group had significant higher Lp(a) levels. Furthermore, the multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that elevated Lp(a) (odds ratio [OR]: 1.451, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.177–1.789, p<.001) and Lp(a)>300 mg/L (OR:1.642, 95% CI:1.018–2.649, p = .042) were positively associated with CAD progression after adjusting for confounding factors. In addition, those relation seemed to be more prominent in subjects with lower body mass index (OR: 1.880, 95% CI: 1.224–2.888, p for interaction = .060).ConclusionsElevated baseline serum Lp(a) is positively and independently associated with angiographic progression of CAD, particularly in participants with relatively low body mass index. Therefore, Lp(a) could be a potent risk factor for CAD progression, assisting in early risk stratification in cardiovascular patients.     

Cardiometabolic Morbidity and Other Prognostic Factors for Mortality in Adult Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients in North Jakarta,Indonesia

Background:Although there have been several studies investigating prognostic factors for mortality in COVID-19, there have been lack of studies in low- and middle-income countries, including Indonesia. To date, the country has the highest mortality rate among Asian countries.Objective:We sought to identify the prognostic factors of mortality in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Jakarta.Methods:In this retrospective cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with confirmed COVID-19 from Koja General Hospital (North Jakarta, Indonesia) who had been hospitalized between March 20^th and July 31^st, 2020. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and radiology data were extracted from the medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to explore the prognostic factors associated with in-hospital death.Results:Two hundred forty-three patients were included in the study, of whom 32 died. Comorbid of hypertension (OR 3.59; 95% CI 1.12–11.48; p = 0.031), obesity (OR 6.34; 95% CI 1.68–23.98; p = 0.007), immediate need of HFNC and/or IMV (OR 64.93; 95% CI 11.08–380.61; p < 0.001), abnormal RDW (OR 3.68; 95% CI 1.09–12.34; p = 0.035), ALC < 1,000/µL (OR 3.51; 95% CI 1.08–11.44; p = 0.038), D-dimer > 500 ng/mL (OR 9.36; 95% CI 1.53–57.12; p = 0.015) on admission, as well as chloroquine treatment (OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.09–11.99; p = 0.036) were associated with greater risk of overall mortality in COVID-19 patients. The likelihood of mortality increased with increasing number of prognostic factors.Conclusion:The potential prognostic factors of hypertension, obesity, immediate need of HFNC and/or IMV, abnormal RDW, ALC < 1,000/µL, D-dimer > 500 ng/mL, and chloroquine treatment could help clinicians to identify COVID-19 patients with poor prognosis at an early stage.     

Cigarette Smoking and Risk Perceptions During the COVID-19 Pandemic Reported by Recently Hospitalized Participants in a Smoking Cessation Trial

BackgroundCigarette smoking is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 disease. Understanding smokers’ responses to the pandemic will help assess its public health impact and inform future public health and provider messages to smokers.ObjectiveTo assess risk perceptions and change in tobacco use among current and former smokers during the COVID-19 pandemic.DesignCross-sectional survey conducted in May–July 2020 (55% response rate)Participants694 current and former daily smokers (mean age 53, 40% male, 78% white) who had been hospitalized pre-COVID-19 and enrolled into a smoking cessation clinical trial at hospitals in Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, and Tennessee.Main MeasuresPerceived risk of COVID-19 due to tobacco use; changes in tobacco consumption and interest in quitting tobacco use; self-reported quitting and relapse since January 2020.Key Results68% (95% CI, 65–72%) of respondents believed that smoking increases the risk of contracting COVID-19 or having a more severe case. In adjusted analyses, perceived risk was higher in Massachusetts where COVID-19 had already surged than in Pennsylvania and Tennessee which were pre-surge during survey administration (AOR 1.56, 95% CI, 1.07–2.28). Higher perceived COVID-19 risk was associated with increased interest in quitting smoking (AOR 1.72, 95% CI 1.01–2.92). During the pandemic, 32% (95% CI, 27–37%) of smokers increased, 37% (95% CI, 33–42%) decreased, and 31% (95% CI, 26–35%) did not change their cigarette consumption. Increased smoking was associated with higher perceived stress (AOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.16–1.91). Overall, 11% (95% CI, 8–14%) of respondents who smoked in January 2020 (pre-COVID-19) had quit smoking at survey (mean, 6 months later) while 28% (95% CI, 22–34%) of former smokers relapsed. Higher perceived COVID-19 risk was associated with higher odds of quitting and lower odds of relapse.ConclusionsMost smokers believed that smoking increased COVID-19 risk. Smokers’ responses to the pandemic varied, with increased smoking related to stress and increased quitting associated with perceived COVID-19 vulnerability.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11606-021-06913-3.KEY WORDS: cigarette smoking, electronic cigarettes, COVID-19, risk perceptions     

Fatores que Impactam a Decisão de Realizar Ventriculografia Esquerda em Doença Arterial Coronariana

BackgroundLeft ventriculography is an invasive method for assessment of left ventricular systolic function. Since the advent of noninvasive methods, its use has been questioned, as it carries some risk to the patient.ObjectiveTo assess which factors are independently associated with the decision to perform ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease.MethodsAnalytical, retrospective, database review study of electronic medical records comparing 21 predefined variables of interest among patients undergoing coronary angiography. P-values <0.05 were considered significant.ResultsWe evaluated 600 consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography. Left ventriculography was performed in the majority of cases (54%). After multivariate analysis, patients with chronic coronary syndrome (OR 1.72; 95% CI: 1.20–2.46; p < 0.01) were more likely to undergo the procedure. Patients with known ventricular function (OR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.40–0.85; p < 0.01); those with a history of CABG (OR 0.31; 95% CI: 0.14–0.69; p < 0.01) or hypertension (OR 0.58; 95% CI: 0.36–0.94; p = 0.02); and those with higher creatinine levels (OR 0.42; 95% CI: 0.26–0.69; p < 0.01) had greater odds of not undergoing ventriculography.ConclusionsIn patients undergoing coronary angiography, a diagnosis of chronic coronary syndrome was independently associated with greater likelihood of left ventriculography, while having previously determined ventricular function, a history of hypertension or CABG, and higher creatinine levels were associated with a decreased likelihood of undergoing this procedure.     

Minimally-invasive versus transcatheter aortic valve implantation: systematic review with meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies

BackgroundMinimally invasive aortic valve replacement (MiAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) provide aortic valve replacement (AVR) by less invasive methods than conventional surgical AVR, by avoiding complete sternotomy. This study directly compares and analyses the available evidence for early outcomes between these two AVR methods.MethodsElectronic databases were searched from inception until August 2019 for studies comparing MiAVR to TAVI, according to predefined search criteria. Propensity-matched studies with sufficient data were included in a meta-analysis.ResultsEight studies with 9,744 patients were included in the quantitative analysis. Analysis of risk-matched patients showed no difference in early mortality (RR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.37–1.54, P=0.44). MiAVR had a signal towards lower rate of postoperative stroke, although this did not reach statistical significance (OR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.13–1.29, P=0.13). MiAVR had significantly lower rates of new pacemaker (PPM) requirement (OR 0.29, 95% CI, 0.16–0.52, P<0.0001) and postoperative aortic insufficiency (AI) or paravalvular leak (PVL) (OR 0.05, 95% CI, 0.01–0.20, P<0.0001) compared to TAVI, (OR 0.42, 95% CI, 0.13–1.29, P=0.13), while acute kidney injury (AKI) was higher in MiAVR compared to TAVI (11.1% vs. 5.2%, OR 2.28, 95% CI, 1.25–4.16, P=0.007).ConclusionsIn patients of equivalent surgical risk scores, MiAVR may be performed with lower rates of postoperative PPM requirement and AI/PVL, higher rates of AKI and no statistical difference in postoperative stroke or short-term mortality, compared to TAVI. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these results.     

Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of NM23 expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:There is a heated debate on the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance with non-metastasis 23 (NM23) expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thus, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of NM23 for NSCLC patients.Methods:Pubmed, Embase, and Web of Science were exhaustively searched to identify relevant studies published prior to March, 2020. Odds radios (ORs) and hazard radios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to summarize the statistics of clinicopathological and prognostic assessments. Q-test and I²-statistic were utilized to assess heterogeneity across the included studies. We also performed subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses to identify the source of heterogeneity. Publication bias was detected by Begg and Egger tests. Sensitivity analysis was used to value the stability of our results. All the data were analyzed using statistical packages implemented in R version 4.0.5.Results:Data from a total of 3170 patients from 36 studies were extracted. The meta-analysis revealed that low expression of NM23 was correlated with higher risk of NSCLC (OR = 4.35; 95% CI: 2.76–6.85; P < .01), poorer tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging (OR = 1.39; 95% CI: 1.01–1.90; P = .04), poorer differentiation degree (OR = 1.37; 95% CI: 1.01–1.86; P = .04), positive lymph node metastasis (OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.22–2.74; P < .01), lung adenocarcinoma (OR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.20–1.75; P < .01), and poorer 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (hazard radio = 2.33; 95%CI: 1.32–4.11; P < .01). The subgroup analyses and meta-regression analyses suggested that the “Publication year”, “Country”, “Sample size”, and “Cutoff value” might be the source of heterogeneity in TNM staging, differentiation degree, and lymph node metastasis. Both Begg test and Egger test verified that there were publication bias in 5-year OS rate. Sensitivity analysis supported the credibility of the results.Conclusion:The reduced NM23 expression is strongly associated with higher risk of NSCLC, higher TNM staging, poorer differentiation degree, positive lymph node metastasis, lung adenocarcinoma, and poorer 5-year OS rate in NSCLC patients, which indicated that NM23 could serve as a biomarker predicating the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of NSCLC.     

Determinants of Mortality from Severe Dengue in Brazil: A Population-Based Case-Control Study

Although increases in severity of mortality from dengue infection have been observed in Brazil, their determinants are not fully known. A case–control study was conducted by using the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, including patients with severe dengue during 2000–2005. Cases were defined as patients that died and controls were those who survived. Hierarchical multivariate logistic regression was performed. During the study period, there were 12,321 severe cases of dengue and 1,062 deaths. Factors independently associated with death included age ≥ 50 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.59–3.29), < 4 years of schooling (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.47–2.28), a rural area (OR =2.84, 95% CI = 2.19–3.69), hospitalization (OR = 1.42, 95% CI = 1.17–1.73), and a high hematocrit (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.85–3.28). Factors associated with a lower chance of dying were female sex (OR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.67–0.87), history of previous dengue (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62–0.99), positive tourniquet test result (OR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.33–0.66), laboratory diagnosis of dengue (OR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.61–0.92), and a platelet count of 50,000–100,000 cells/mm³ (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.36–0.87). The risk profile identified in this study should serve to direct public health interventions to minimize deaths.