Parents who quit smoking and their adult children's smoking cessation: a 20-year follow-up study

Aims   Extending our earlier findings from a longitudinal cohort study, this study examines parents' early and late smoking cessation as predictors of their young adult children's smoking cessation.
Design   Parents' early smoking cessation status was assessed when their children were aged 8 years; parents' late smoking cessation was assessed when their children were aged 17 years. Young adult children's smoking cessation, of at least 6 months duration, was assessed at age 28 years.
Setting   Forty Washington State school districts.
Participants and measurements   Participants were 991 at least weekly smokers at age 17 whose parents were ever regular smokers and who also reported their smoking status at age 28. Questionnaire data were gathered on parents and their children (49% female and 91% Caucasian) in a longitudinal cohort (84% retention).
Findings   Among children who smoked daily at age 17, parents' quitting early (i.e. by the time their children were aged 8) was associated with a 1.7 times higher odds of these children quitting by age 28 compared to those whose parents did not quit [odds ratio (OR) 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23, 2.36]. Results were similar among children who smoked weekly at age 17 (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.41, 2.58). There was a similar, but non-significant, pattern of results among those whose parents quit late.
Conclusions   Supporting our earlier findings, results suggest that parents' early smoking cessation has a long-term influence on their adult children's smoking cessation. Parents who smoke should be encouraged to quit when their children are young.     

Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: proposal for a common standard

Smoking cessation treatment is now integrated into many health-care systems and a major research effort is under way to improve current success rates. Until now results from randomized clinical trials have been reported in many different ways, leading to problems of interpretation. We propose six standard criteria comprising the 'Russell Standard' (RS). These criteria are applicable to trials of cessation aids where participants have a defined target quit date and there is face-to-face contact with researchers or clinic staff, as follows. (1) Follow-up for 6 months (RS6) or 12 months (RS12) from the target quit date or the end of a predefined 'grace period'; (2) self-report of smoking abstinence over the whole follow-up period allowing up to five cigarettes in total; (3) biochemical verification of abstinence at least at the 6-month or 12-month follow-up point; (4) use of an 'intention-to-treat' approach in which data from all randomized smokers are included in the analysis unless they have died or moved to an untraceable address (participants who are included in the analysis are counted as smokers if their smoking status at the final follow-up cannot be determined); (5) following-up 'protocol violators' and using their true smoking status in the analysis; and (6) collecting follow-up data blind to smokers' allocation to trial group. We believe that these criteria provide the best compromise between practicability and surrogacy for long-term cessation and will enable meaningful comparison between studies. There may be good reasons why other outcome criteria would also be reported, and studies that involve interventions with special groups or where there is no designated target quit date or face to face contact would need to adapt these criteria accordingly.     

Preliminary evidence for gender-specific effects of topiramate as a potential aid to smoking cessation

AIMS: Study aims were threefold: (i) to determine the feasibility, potential efficacy and safety of topiramate as an aid to smoking cessation; (ii) to examine potential predictors of abstinence including gender; and (iii) to explore topiramate's effects on tobacco withdrawal and post-cessation weight gain. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 11-week clinical trial with a 6-week dosage titration period and 5 weeks of maintenance treatment. SETTING: Single-site, out-patient, randomized clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight adult male and 49 female chronic smokers who smoked an average of > 10 cigarettes per day and who were motivated to try to quit smoking. INTERVENTION: Random assignment to receive either topiramate (n = 43) up to 200 mg daily in divided doses or placebo (n = 44) orally combined with brief counseling over an 11-week period. MEASUREMENTS: Carbon monoxide (CO)-confirmed 4-week prolonged abstinence rate during weeks 8-11. Changes in tobacco withdrawal, body weight and safety parameters were also assessed. FINDINGS: Overall, no significant increase in the prolonged abstinence rate was detected, but logistic regression analysis indicated significant gender-specific differences. Men treated with topiramate were nearly 16 times more likely to quit smoking than women on topiramate [37.5% versus 3.7%; odds ratio (OR) = 15.6; P = 0.016] and were roughly four times more likely to quit smoking than placebo-treated men (37.5% versus 13.6%; OR = 3.8; P = 0.098). Topiramate-treated men reported significantly lower tobacco withdrawal scores than both women taking topiramate and men on placebo. On average, male cessators on placebo gained 3.30 kg, whereas topiramate led to a 0.72 kg weight loss (P = 0.03). Study discontinuation rates due to adverse events (AEs) were significantly higher in the topiramate group (topiramate 23% versus placebo 2%). The most commonly reported AEs in the topiramate arm were paraesthesia, fatigue, difficulty with concentration/attention and nervousness. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate produced gender-specific effects on smoking cessation. Male smokers had markedly greater quit rates than female smokers and men were roughly four times more likely to quit smoking when treated with topiramate as compared to placebo. Topiramate was fairly well tolerated, although higher discontinuation rates were seen. Topiramate's triple effects aiding smoking abstinence, attenuating nicotine withdrawal and preventing post-cessation weight gain might make it a promising agent for treating tobacco addiction, at least in men.     

Combination bupropion SR and varenicline for smoking cessation: a systematic review

ABSTRACT

Background: Tobacco is the leading cause of preventable death in the world. Current cessation medications include nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline, and bupropion, while combination therapy primarily entails NRT with either varenicline or bupropion. However, recent studies have examined varenicline and bupropion in combination. Objectives: A systematic review assessing the efficacy and safety of combination varenicline and bupropion was conducted. Methods: PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched using terms: “varenicline combination”, “bupropion combination”, “bupropion AND varenicline”, and “bupropion AND varenicline combination smoking cessation”, yielding four studies including 1193 total patients. Results: Combination therapy yielded greater efficacy than varenicline monotherapy in two randomized controlled trials and one retrospective outcomes study. One single-arm Phase II trial provided additional efficacy and safety data. Of the prospective trials, one displayed a greater 4-week smoking abstinence for weeks 8–11 with combination (39.8%) versus monotherapy (25.9%) (OR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.07–3.35). The other demonstrated greater prolonged abstinence (continuous abstinence from week 2) at 12 weeks (OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.05–2.12) and 26 weeks (OR = 1.52; 95% CI = 1.04–2.22), though results were not significant at 52 weeks in this study. The retrospective study displayed higher success rates (continuous abstinence rates at 52 weeks) with combination varenicline and bupropion (55.0%; compared to varenicline monotherapy (32.1%), p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses suggest that this combination may be more beneficial in males and patients with higher baseline nicotine dependence. Conclusion: To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first review conducted to compile current literature on this novel pharmacotherapy combination for smoking cessation. Combination bupropion SR and varenicline displayed greater efficacy in smoking cessation than varenicline monotherapy, though further safety analysis is warranted to rule out additive psychiatric adverse effects.     

Smoking and smoking cessation in Latin America: a review of the current situation and available treatments

Tobacco smoking is a growing problem throughout Latin American countries, especially in underdeveloped countries where poverty and lack of education about the dangers of smoking may make people more susceptible to becoming smokers. Moreover, the economies of many Latin American countries have become dependent on the production of tobacco. Furthermore, because of the associated promotion of tobacco, smoking has integrated into many Latin American cultures. Nevertheless, the harmful health effects of tobacco use are well documented, including greatly increased risks of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cardiovascular disease, and many forms of cancer. The medical costs associated with treating these diseases far outweigh the economic benefits of producing and selling this deadly crop. To control the tobacco pandemic in Latin American countries, nicotine addiction must be recognized and treated as a disease. Governments, both national and local, need to be more involved in enacting anti-smoking policies such as higher tobacco taxation, control of illegal tobacco smuggling, and reimbursement of medical smoking cessation interventions. The training of health professions in the area of nicotine addiction must also be improved, so that they may better assist smokers in their quit attempts and advise patients on, and prescribe, effective smoking cessation pharmacotherapies.     

Brief opportunistic smoking cessation interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare advice to quit and offer of assistance

Aims This study aimed to assess the effects of opportunistic brief physician advice to stop smoking and offer of assistance on incidence of attempts to stop and quit success in smokers not selected by motivation to quit. Methods We included relevant trials from the Cochrane Reviews of physician advice for smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT), varenicline and bupropion. We extracted data on quit attempts and quit success. Estimates were combined using the Mantel–Haentszel method and heterogeneity assessed with the I² statistic. Study quality was assessed by method of randomization, allocation concealment and follow‐up blind to allocation. Results Thirteen studies were included. Compared to no intervention, advice to quit on medical grounds increased the frequency of quit attempts [risk ratio (RR) 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.16–1.33], but not as much as behavioural support for cessation (RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.52–3.11) or offering NRT (RR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.48–1.89). In a direct comparison, offering assistance generated more quit attempts than giving advice to quit on medical grounds (RR 1.69, 95% CI: 1.24–2.31 for behavioural support and 1.39, 95% CI: 1.25–1.54 for offering medication). There was evidence that medical advice increased the success of quit attempts and inconclusive evidence that offering assistance increased their success. Conclusions Physicians may be more effective in promoting attempts to stop smoking by offering assistance to all smokers than by advising smokers to quit and offering assistance only to those who express an interest in doing so.     

Behavioral intervention to promote smoking cessation and prevent weight gain: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aims The prospect of weight gain discourages many cigarette smokers from quitting. Practice guidelines offer varied advice about managing weight gain after quitting smoking, but no systematic review and meta‐analysis have been available. We reviewed evidence to determine whether behavioral weight control intervention compromises smoking cessation attempts, and if it offers an effective way to reduce post‐cessation weight gain. Methods We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared combined smoking treatment and behavioral weight control to smoking treatment alone for adult smokers. English‐language studies were identified through searches of PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Of 779 articles identified and 35 potentially relevant RCTs screened, 10 met the criteria and were included in the meta‐analysis. Results Patients who received both smoking treatment and weight treatment showed increased abstinence [odds ratio (OR) = 1.29, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.01, 1.64] and reduced weight gain (g = ?0.30, 95% CI = ?0.57, ?0.02) in the short term (<3 months) compared with patients who received smoking treatment alone. Differences in abstinence (OR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.85, 1.79) and weight control (g = ?0.17, 95% CI = ?0.42, 0.07) were no longer significant in the long term (>6 months). Conclusions Findings provide no evidence that combining smoking treatment and behavioral weight control produces any harm and significant evidence of short‐term benefit for both abstinence and weight control. However, the absence of long‐term enhancement of either smoking cessation or weight control by the time‐limited interventions studied to date provides insufficient basis to recommend societal expenditures on weight gain prevention treatment for patients who are quitting smoking.     

Reimbursement for smoking cessation treatment may double the abstinence rate: results of a randomized trial

AIMS: Few smokers who try to quit smoking use smoking cessation treatment (SCT), and cost could be one factor. To increase the number of successful quitters, we assessed whether financial reimbursement for SCT would encourage the use of SCT and would as a result increase the 6-month point abstinence rate. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We recruited smokers aged over 18 years from a random sample of Dutch inhabitants insured by one health insurance company. INTERVENTION AND DESIGN: The smokers were assigned randomly to the intervention group (n = 632) or control group (n = 634). Respondents in the intervention group received an offer of reimbursement for nicotine replacement therapy, bupropion and behavioural counselling. No reimbursement was offered to the control group. To preclude a change of behaviour due to disappointment in the control group, we used a randomized consent design. FINDINGS: During the reimbursement period, 10.8% smokers in the intervention group reported having used SCT compared with 4.1% in the control group (OR = 2.9, 95% CI 1.8-4.7). In the intervention group, 23.4% smokers tried to stop compared with 20.8% in the control group (OR = 1.2, 95% CI 0.9-2.4). After 6 months, the biochemically validated 7-day point prevalence abstinence rate was 5.5% in the intervention group and 2.8% in the control group (OR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.2-4.1). CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement for SCT seems efficacious in increasing the use of SCT and may double the number of successful quitters.     

Efficacy of exercise counselling as an aid for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial

Aim To examine whether exercise counselling increases smoking abstinence and reduces tobacco withdrawal and gains in weight and body fat. Design A randomized controlled trial. Setting A community‐based stop smoking clinic. Participants Two hundred and ninety‐nine male and female smokers. Intervention Participants were assigned randomly to a 7‐week smoking cessation programme, including nicotine replacement therapy plus either (i) exercise counselling, or (ii) health education advice with equal contact time as for the exercise counselling condition. Measurements Six weeks of smoking abstinence was confirmed by expired carbon monoxide. Findings There was no significant difference in smoking abstinence between the exercise group (n = 154) and the controls (n = 145) at 6 weeks (39.6% versus 38.6%), nor was there any difference in gains in weight or body fat, although those in the exercise group increased their exercise levels. Exercise participants reported less tension, anxiety and stress than the controls during the first week of smoking abstinence (P = 0.03, 0.01 and 0.04, respectively), less irritability throughout 2 weeks of abstinence (P = 0.03), and less restlessness throughout 3 weeks of abstinence (P = 0.04). Conclusions Adding brief exercise counselling to a smoking cessation programme did not increase smoking abstinence or reduce gains in weight or body fat significantly, although exercise levels were raised and there were some beneficial effects on psychological symptoms.