Management of recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

Recurrent HCV infection is universal in liver transplant recipients who are viremic pretransplant. The rate of histologic disease progression after transplantation is more rapid, and the risk of cirrhosis by 5 to 10 years is about 30%. Several donor, recipient, and viral factors have been associated with worse post-transplant outcomes in recipients with recurrent hepatitis C.Whether or not HCV-infected recipients of live donor grafts have worse out-comes compared with deceased donor graft recipients is controversial. To maximize the long-term survival of recipients with HCV infection, eradication of infection is the ultimate goal. Treatment of recurrent HCV after liver transplantation can be undertaken at several different time points: (1) prophylactically, at the time of transplantation; (2) pre-emptively, in the early post-transplant period; and (3) after established recurrent histologic disease is present. Prophylactic therapy for HCV infection has no established role at present, but studies are ongoing. Preemptive therapy using IFN and RBV has resulted in variable SVR rates (9%-43%) and is generally poorly tolerated, especially if the patient has advanced liver disease pretransplantation.Treatment of established recurrent HCV disease with combination PEGIFN and RBV is associated with a SVR in about 30% to 35% of patients overall but is limited by high rates of dose reduction or drug discontinuation. In conclusion, successful HCV eradication in the post-transplant setting is difficult with current treatment options, but it is possible. Determination of the optimal doses of antiviral drugs in transplant patients and improvements in drug tolerability may be important first steps in achieving enhanced response rates. There is a need for new drugs in this population that have greater efficacy and a better safety profile.     

Challenges of recurrent hepatitis C in the liver transplant patient

Cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C virus(HCV)is a very common indication for liver transplant.Unfortunately recurrence of HCV is almost universal in patients who are viremic at the time of transplant.The progression of fibrosis has been shown to be more rapid in the post-transplant patients than in the transplant na?ve,hence treatment of recurrent HCV needs to be considered for all patients with documented recurrent HCV.Management of recurrent HCV is a challenging situation both for patients and physicians due to multiple reasons as discussed in this review.The standard HCV treatment with pegylated interferon and Ribavarin can be considered in these patients but it leads to a lower rate of sustained virologic clearance than in the nontransplanted population.Some of the main challenges associated with treating recurrent HCV in post-transplant patients include the presence of cytopenias;need to monitor drug-drug interactions and the increased incidence of renal compromise.In spite of these obstacles all patients with recurrent HCV should be considered for treatment since it is associated with improve-ment in survival and a delay in fibrosis progression.With the arrival of direct acting antiviral drugs there is renewed hope for better outcomes in the treatment of post-transplant HCV recurrence.This review evaluates current literature on this topic and identifies challenges associated with the management of post-transplant HCV recurrence.     

Conversion to mycophenolate mofetil for modulating recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to analyze the influence of cyclosporine A (CsA) taper in conjunction with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) therapy on recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) in liver transplant patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nineteen liver recipients with serologically and morphologically confirmed recurrent HCV were included in this study. After MMF introduction up to a maximum dose of 2000 mg/day, CsA dose was significantly tapered. In the control group immunosuppression remained unchanged. Allograft function and morphology, viral loads, and renal function were analyzed continuously. RESULTS: MMF treatment was well tolerated without risk of rejection. Allograft fibrosis progressed in 6 patients of the MMF group (66.6%) and none (0%) of the controls at 12-month biopsy (P=0.005). Moreover, aminotransferases and viral loads increased slightly in the MMF-treated patients. Renal function improved significantly (serum creatinine: 239.3+/-90.2 micromol/L vs. 175.8+/-46.0 micromol/L; P=0.008) in the treatment group, while deteriorating (serum creatinine: 156.8+/-44.6 micromol/L vs. 214.8+/-120.1 micromol/L; P=0.06) in the controls. CONCLUSION: MMF introduction allows a safe CsA taper in HCV-positive liver transplant patients and results in significant improvement of renal function. However, there seems to be a risk of marked progression of HCV-induced allograft injury.     

Fulminant hepatic failure: to transplant or not to transplant

Despite progress in intensive care regimens and the introduction of various hepatic support procedures, the survival rate for fulminant hepatic failure remained around 20%. In the past few years, orthotopic liver transplantation has increased the survival rate to more than 50% and thus is generally considered the treatment of choice. However, since about 20% of the patients on standard therapy recover spontaneously, not all patients presenting with fulminant hepatic failure should undergo transplantation immediately. Therefore attempts should be made to identify the patients with "potentially reversible" liver disease in an early phase. In this article strategies for deciding which therapy fits the individual patient are proposed. The decision "to transplant or not to transplant" should be based on residual functioning liver-cell mass (e.g. factor V is less or greater than 15%), the presence or absence of systemic complications such as lactic acidosis and renal failure and the aetiology of the liver disease (e.g. reversible causes such as viral hepatitis B and irreversible causes such as Wilson's disease). A flow diagram has been constructed.     

Mortality predictors in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C cirrhosis.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Recipients of orthotopic liver transplant for hepatitis C (HCV) invariably develop recurrent disease. The risk factors for death and retransplantation following the development of cirrhosis from HCV are unclear. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of survival in liver transplant recipients who develop cirrhosis from recurrent HCV. METHODS: We reviewed records of patients who underwent liver transplantation for cirrhosis due to HCV between January 1990 and December 2001. Prognostic factors of patient survival following the development of recurrent cirrhosis were identified through multivariate analysis. RESULTS: During the study period, 511 patients underwent transplantation for HCV cirrhosis. Of these, 65 patients (13%) developed biopsy proven recurrent cirrhosis from HCV; 43 (8%) were relisted for transplantation, and 24 (5%) underwent retransplantation. The overall Kaplan-Meier patient survival rates after the histologic diagnosis of cirrhosis at 1 and 5 years were 66% and 30%, respectively. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed patients with higher last (i.e. at follow-up or prior to retransplantation) International normalized ratio (INR) values (hazard ratios (HR)=2.02, 95% confidence interval 1.26, 3.24, P<0.01) to have an increased risk of death. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested survival was decreased after the diagnosis of cirrhosis from recurrent HCV. Higher INR was associated with an increased risk of death following the development of cirrhosis.     

Treatment modalities for hypersplenism in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C

Hepatitis C is the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation in the United States. Unfortunately,hepatitis C recurs universally in the transplanted liver and is the major cause of decreased graft and patient survival. The combination therapy of interferon and ribavirin has been shown to be the most effective therapy for recurrent hepatitis C. However, pre- and post-transplant hypersplenism often precludes patients from receiving the antiviral therapy. Splenectomy and partial splenic embolization are the two invasive modalities that can correct the cytopenia associated with hypersplenism. In this report we review the two treatment options, their associated outcomes and complications.     

Treatment modalities for hypersplenism in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C

Hepatitis C is the most common indication for orthotopic liver transplantation in the United States. Unfortunately,hepatitis C recurs universally in the transplanted liver and is the major cause of decreased graft and patient survival. The combination therapy of interferon and ribavirin has been shown to be the most effective therapy for recurrent hepatitis C. However, pre- and post-transplant hypersplenism often precludes patients from receiving the antiviral therapy. Splenectomy and partial splenic embolization are the two invasive modalities that can correct the cytopenia associated with hypersplenism. In this report we review the two treatment options, their associated outcomes and complications.     

Approach to recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Hepatitis C-associated liver failure is the most common indication for liver transplantation. Histologic evidence of recurrence is apparent in approximately 50% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected recipients in the first postoperative year. Approximately 10% of HCV-infected recipients will die or lose their allograft due to hepatitis C-associated allograft failure. HCV-infected recipients who undergo retransplantation have 5-year patient and graft survival rates that are broadly similar to those for transplant recipients who are not HCV infected. Although the choice of calcineurin inhibitor, mycophenolate mofetil, or both has not been clearly shown to affect histologic recurrence of hepatitis C, higher cumulative exposure to corticosteroids is associated with increased mortality and more severe histologic recurrence. In contrast to treatment of non-HCV-infected recipients, treatment of HCV-infected transplant recipients for acute cellular rejection is associated with attenuated patient survival. Steroid-resistant rejection with or without the use of T-cell-depleting therapies is associated with a greater than fivefold increased risk of mortality in HCV-infected liver transplant recipients. Pegylated interferon with or without ribavirin should be considered for treatment of recipients with histologically apparent recurrence of hepatitis C before total bilirubin exceeds 3 mg/dL. The role of hepatitis C immunoglobulin and new immuno-suppressive agents in the management of hepatitis C after transplant continues to evolve.     

Recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplant

End stage liver disease from hepatitis C is the most common indication for liver transplantation in many parts of the world accounting for up to 40% of liver transplants. Antiviral therapy either before or after liver transplantation is challenging due to side effects and lower efficacy in patients with cirrhosis and liver transplant recipients, as well as from drug interactions with immunosuppressants. Factors that may affect recurrent hepatitis C include donor age, immunosuppression, IL28B genotype, cytomegalovirus infection, and metabolic syndrome. Older donor age has persistently been shown to have the greatest impact on recurrent hepatitis C. After liver transplantation, distinguishing recurrent hepatitis C from acute cellular rejection may be difficult, although the development of molecular markers may help in making the correct diagnosis. The advent of interferon free regimens with direct acting antiviral agents that include NS3/4A protease inhibitors, NS5B polymerase inhibitors and NS5A inhibitors holds great promise in improving outcomes for liver transplant candidates and recipients.     

Flexible and individualized treatment to achieve sustained viral response for recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

Summary. Hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation is universal and is a major cause of long‐term graft failure. Improving the effectiveness of recurrent hepatitis C treatment is extremely important. We studied 35 anti‐hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐positive patients who underwent liver transplantation. Among the 35 patients, 25 patients had recurrent hepatitis C and received antiviral treatment. HCV RNA load after liver transplantation was increased by 3.68‐fold. The antiviral treatment regimen comprised pegylated‐interferon (180 μg) every 2 weeks and ribavirin at a dose of 200–400 mg every day. The treatment duration was flexible and individualized, and depended on viral response to treatment. The dosage of tacrolimus was decreased gradually to minimize immunocompromise. Median (interquartile) serum level of tacrolimus was 6.9 (6–8.9) ng/mL at initiation of treatment and 3.8 (3.6–5) ng/mL at the end of treatment. One patient (4.0%) was withdrawn from the study, and three patients (12%) died of infection during treatment. At end of treatment, 18 of 25 patients (72%) were negative for serum HCV RNA. After an additional 6 months following the end of treatment, 16 of the 25 patients (64%) had sustained viral response (SVR) and only two patients had HCV relapse. The 1‐year, 3‐year and 5‐year survival rates were 91.4%, 84.5% and 84.5% for all patients and 88.0%, 82.8% and 82.8% for the 25 patients who received antiviral therapy. In conclusion, recurrent HCV infection is an important issue in liver transplantation. The flexible regimen of antiviral therapy and individualized immunosuppressive agents that was applied in this study achieved a SVR rate of 64%.     

A randomized study on Peg-interferon alfa-2a with or without ribavirin in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We performed a randomized trial on pegylated interferon alfa-2a (Peg-IFNalpha) monotherapy vs Peg-IFNalpha and ribavirin in non-cirrhotic liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. METHODS: Forty-two patients transplanted for HCV-related cirrhosis 12-96 months earlier were randomized to Peg-IFNalpha monotherapy (180 microg weekly) or Peg-IFNalpha and ribavirin, up to the maximum tolerated dose, for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Early virological response (EVR, i.e., HCV-RNA2 log drop at week 12) occurred in 76% of the monotherapy and 71% of the combination groups, respectively (intention-to treat). Sustained virological response (SVR) occurred in 8 (38%) and 7 (33%) patients, respectively. EVR had a positive predictive value for SVR of 50% and 47%, respectively, and a 100% negative predictive value in both groups. Six drop-outs occurred in the monotherapy (including 3 rejections) and 7 in the combination groups (including one rejection). Peg-INFalpha dose was reduced in 7 and 8 patients, respectively. The average daily dose of ribavirin was 435 mg/day. CONCLUSIONS: Peg-IFNalpha-2a, with or without ribavirin, induces SVR in one-third of transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Treatment cessation is indicated in patients without EVR. The low SVR rate is mainly due to inability to sustain full doses of antivirals and lack of the booster effect of ribavirin.     

Fibrosing cytolytic liver failure secondary to recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation.

Four patients who underwent transplantation for hepatitis B virus-related liver disease developed rapidly progressive liver failure attributable to recurrent hepatitis B disease typified by hyperbilirubinemia and distinctive hepatocyte ballooning and progressive fibrosis consistent with recently reported fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Among these four patients, the mean interval from transplantation to redocumentation of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) was 5 months, to development of malaise and jaundice 6 months, to histological diagnosis 7 months, and to graft failure 8 months. The only patient who underwent retransplantation had accelerated recurrence of the same syndrome with biopsy documentation 1 month later and graft failure 2 months later. Distinctive histological features included confluent hepatocellular ballooning and progressive periportal fibrosis followed by lobular collapse over 4-6 weeks without significant inflammation. Immunohistochemical staining showed marked HBsAg and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) immunoreactivity. The rapid development of cytolytic hepatocellular necrosis and lobular collapse with prominent HBcAg immunoreactivity without significant inflammation suggests a cytolytic rather than immune pathogenesis for this unique and devastating form of recurrent hepatitis B that might better be termed "fibrosing cytolytic hepatitis."     

Long-term maintenance of sustained virological response in liver transplant recipients treated for recurrent hepatitis C

BackgroundThe recurrence of hepatitis C viral infection is common after liver transplant, and achieving a sustained virological response to antiviral treatment is desirable for reducing the risk of graft loss and improving patients’ survival.AimTo investigate the long-term maintenance of sustained virological response in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C recurrence.Methods436 Liver transplant recipients (74.1% genotype 1) who underwent combined antiviral therapy for hepatitis C recurrence were retrospectively evaluated.ResultsThe overall sustained virological response rate was 40% (173/436 patients), and the mean follow-up after liver transplantation was 11 ± 3.5 years (range, 5–24). Patients with a sustained virological response demonstrated a 5-year survival rate of 97% and a 10-year survival rate of 93%; all but 6 (3%) patients remained hepatitis C virus RNA-negative during follow-up. Genotype non-1 (p = 0.007), treatment duration >80% of the scheduled period (p = 0.027), and early virological response (p = 0.002), were associated with the maintenance of sustained virological response as indicated by univariate analysis. Early virological response was the only independent predictor of sustained virological response maintenance (p = 0.008).ConclusionsSustained virological response achieved after combined antiviral treatment is maintained in liver transplant patients with recurrent hepatitis C and is associated with an excellent 5-year survival.     

A pilot study of interferon alfa and ribavirin combination in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C

Although interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin are widely used in the treatment of hepatitis C, their role in the transplant recipient is unclear. We conducted a pilot study to determine the efficacy and safety of this therapy in transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Patients at least 6 months posttransplantation were treated with IFN-alpha 3 million units 3 times a week subcutaneously and ribavirin 800 mg daily by mouth for 48 weeks followed by ribavirin monotherapy for 24 weeks. The primary end point was sustained virologic response, and secondary end points included biochemical, virologic, and histologic responses at the end of combination treatment. Thirty-eight patients initiated therapy but 16 withdrew due to adverse effects, including 2 with myocardial infarction. Median age was 50 years; 74% were men, and 91% had genotype 1. The median interval between transplantation and enrollment was 23 months. On an intention-to-treat basis, 7 patients (18%) had a biochemical and 5 (13%) had a virologic response at the end of combination treatment. Inflammatory activity did not change, but fibrosis worsened in virologic nonresponders. Ribavirin maintenance caused a further decrease in serum alanine aminotransferase levels, but hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels increased. Only 2 of the 38 patients (5%) had a sustained virologic response. Several patients required treatment with erythropoietin for anemia. In conclusion, IFN-alpha and ribavirin are effective in a small proportion of liver allograft recipients with recurrent hepatitis C. Adverse effects occur commonly, requiring dose reductions and treatment withdrawal.     

Outcome of early vs. deferred antiviral treatment for recurrent hepatitis C in liver transplant recipients

The optimal timing to treat recurrent hepatitis-C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (LT) remains uncertain. We compared the outcome of early (acute phase) and deferred (chronic phase) antiviral treatment for recurrent HCV infection in this population. Consecutive HCV genotype-1 infected LT patients receiving antiviral therapy between 2001-2010 were retrospectively classified according to histology at treatment start into the early or deferred treatment group. Measured endpoints included sustained virological response (SVR) rates and long-term survival. The study cohort comprised 105 patients: 60 (57%) received early treatment (ET) and 45 (43%) deferred treatment (DT). The median interval from LT to antiviral start was 3 (1-9) and 18 months (11-74) in ET and DT respectively. The SVR rate was similar in both treatment groups (23% ET and 36% DT; p = 0.27). After a median follow-up of 5.8 years, all-cause and liver-related mortality were similar in both groups. Variables independently associated with mortality included pre-treatment bilirubin > 2 mg/dL (HR 6.1, 95%CI: 2.8-13.7; p < 0.001), donor age > 60 (HR 3.1, 95%CI: 1.4-6.7; p = 0.01), and failure to achieve SVR (HR 10.3, 95%CI: 1.3-18.3; p = 0.03). In conclusion, early treatment of recurrent HCV is safe, but does not lead to higher SVR rates. In HCV-infected LT recipients, elevated bilirubin, older donor age, and failure to achieve SVR are independently associated with increased mortality.     

Early predictors of antiviral treatment response in liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C genotype 1

The success of current antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence in liver transplant (LT) recipients remains limited. We aimed at evaluating the value of IL28B genotype and early viral kinetics to predict response to standard treatment in the transplant setting. We retrospectively evaluated 104 LT recipients treated for HCV genotype 1 recurrence between 2001 and 2010. Baseline variables, including IL28B genotype, and early viral kinetics were compared among patients who did or did not achieve a sustained virological response (SVR). Logistic regression analyses of candidate variables were conducted to generate a reliable predictive model based on the minimum set of variables. Twenty‐nine (28%) achieved an SVR. On multivariate analysis, the magnitude of HCV RNA decline at 4 weeks (OR: 3.74, 95% CI: 1.64–9.39; P = 0.003) and treatment compliance (OR: 35.27, 95% CI: 3.35–365.54; P = 0.003) were the only independent predictors of SVR. Favourable recipient IL28B genotype significantly correlates with virological response at week 4 (OR 3.23; 95% CI, 1.12–9.15; P = 0.03). By logistic regression analysis, a model including donor age, recipient rs12979860 genotype and viral load at 4 weeks showed the best predictive value for SVR with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.861. Favourable recipient IL28B genotype strongly correlates with the viral response at week 4 which is the strongest predictor of response. The combination of recipient IL28B genotype and donor age with the week 4 response reliably estimates the probability of SVR early on‐treatment and may facilitate therapeutic strategies incorporating new antiviral agents.     

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common indication for liver transplantation in the United States and Europe, and more than 20,000 patients worldwide have undergone transplantation for complications of chronic hepatitis C. In North America, HCV accounts for 15% to 50% of the liver transplants performed in United States transplant programs. To maximize the long-term survival of liver transplant recipients who have HCV infection, eradication of infection is the ultimate goal. Pretransplant antiviral therapy with the goal of achieving viral eradication before transplantation is a consideration in some patients, especially those who have mildly decompensated liver disease. This article focuses on the management of liver transplant recipients who have HCV infection at the time of transplantation. Prophylactic and preemptive therapies, as well as treatment of established recurrent disease, are the strategies reviewed.     

Treatment of recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation

Cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus infection is now the most common indication for liver transplantation in Western Europe and the United States. In the absence of effective prophylaxis, recurrent hepatitis C virus infection is almost inevitable. Although the natural history and intermediateterm outcome of recurrent infection with hepatitis C virus are now better documented, factors that may influence the recurrence of hepatitis and consequent progression of graft disease remain unclear. Interferon used as a single agent for the treatment of recurrent infection has proven unsatisfactory. Early intervention for recurrent infection with the combination of interferon and ribavirin appears promising, and this approach may prevent or delay progression of hepatitis C virus-related graft disease after liver transplantation