Improved posthypoxic recovery in vitro on treatment with drugs used for secondary stroke prevention

Besides aspirin several new drugs for inhibition of platelet aggregation and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibition are used in secondary stroke prevention. Pharmacology and clinical effects, however, are not fully explained by current understanding of underlying mechanisms. Population spike amplitude (PSAP), an established marker of slice integrity, was measured during hypoxia and recovery thereof in hippocampal slices from control CD1 mice (25-35 g) and animals pretreated in vivo with a single i.p. injection of clopidogrel, ticlopidine, or atorvastatine at different time intervals and dosages. Posthypoxic recovery of PSAP was 20 +/- 35% in control CD1 mice. Upon pretreatment with clopidogrel (1-24 h, 0.5-2 mg/kg body weight) an increase up to 81 +/- 20% (p < 0.01 to control) was observed at 1h interval and 1mg/kg. Application of ticlopidine (1-24 h, 1-4 mg/kg body weight) resulted in an improvement of posthypoxic recovery to 61 +/- 41% (p < 0.05 to control) while administration of atorvastatine (1-24 h, 1-4 mg/kg body weight) caused an increase up to 87 +/- 31% (p < 0.01 to control) at 1h interval and 2 mg/kg. On application of these substances in vitro the NADH autofluorescence spectrum in hippocampal slices is blue-shifted suggesting an alteration of oxidative metabolism. The present data demonstrate a shared neuroprotective effect of agents known to inhibit platelets (acetylsalicylic acid, clopidogrel, and ticlopidine) and HMG-CoA reductase (atorvastatine). The time course of this neuroprotective action in the current experimental study (onset within an hour, duration of several hours in contrast to several days) resembles clinical practice in dosing these substances. We hypothesize that an increase of hypoxic tolerance resulting from mild mitochondrial inhibition by these substances is a principal constituent of the effectiveness of these drugs.     

Clopidogrel and [symbol: see text] ticlopidine--improvements on aspirin?

Clopidogrel (Plavix-Sanofi Winthrop/Bristol-Myers Squibb) and [symbol: see text] ticlopidine (Ticlid-Sanofi Winthrop) are inhibitors of platelet function and are promoted as potential alternatives to aspirin. Clopidogrel is licensed for the secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with established atherosclerotic disease. The manufacturer claims that clopidogrel is "significantly more effective at reducing myocardial infarction, stroke and vascular death" compared to aspirin. Ticlopidine is licensed as an alternative to aspirin for secondary prevention of stroke and coronary complications in patients with intermittent claudication. However, in the UK, ticlopidine is more commonly used with aspirin to prevent complications following insertion of coronary stents during angioplasty. We consider whether the claims for clopidogrel and the current use of ticlopidine are justified.     

A benefit-risk assessment of agents used in the secondary prevention of stroke.

Stroke is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Full assessment of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA) patients is required to identify all risk factors and apply appropriate secondary preventative strategies. Antiplatelet therapies are effective in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke and can be justified despite adverse effects such as gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), aspirin plus dipyridamole, ticlopidine and clopidogrel are all of value but their adverse effect profiles vary significantly. Combinations of antiplatelet agents may offer additional benefit but not all combinations have been studied in stroke patients. Anticoagulation with agents such as warfarin is effective with coexisting atrial fibrillation and other conditions predisposing to cardioembolic stroke. Antihypertensive agents have been extensively studied in the primary prevention of stroke; however, relatively few trials of antihypertensive agents in the secondary prevention of stroke are available. The incidence of adverse effects of antihypertensive agents is relatively low and the benefit-risk profile would tend to favour their use in the secondary prevention of stroke. Recent studies of ACE inhibitors have identified an important role for these agents in the secondary prevention of stroke even in those who are normotensive and in those who have had a haemorrhagic stroke. The incidence of serious adverse effects with ACE inhibitors appears relatively low. Lipid-lowering agents may have a role to play in certain groups of patients with stroke. The incidence of adverse effects is relatively low with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Cigarette smoking is an important risk factor for stroke and evidence is available that smoking cessation does reduce the individual's risk of stroke. Pharmacological agents are available to help smoking cessation. In patients with diabetes mellitus, intensive regimens with insulin and oral hypoglycaemic agents have so far not definitively been shown to reduce the incidence of macrovascular complications such as stroke. Tight glycaemic control has been shown to improve microvascular complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy and hence this is reason enough to advocate the use of these agents. Future developments in the treatment of diabetes may help. Secondary prevention of stroke has improved greatly over the past decade and hopefully will continue to improve. The use of pharmacological agents available currently and in the future will be clarified and refined as further clinical trials report.     

Secondary prevention of stroke: a practical guide to drug treatment

Stroke is a disease of the elderly and, as a result of the expected demographic changes in many industrialised countries, its incidence is likely to increase in the future. A first-ever stroke significantly increases the likelihood of further events; thus, secondary prevention is of major importance. Only a minority of recurrent strokes can be prevented by surgical or other invasive methods, meaning that most secondary preventive measures involve drug treatment, which has become increasingly sophisticated in recent years. Ischaemic stroke constitutes the vast majority of all strokes; effective secondary prevention depends on a variety of factors, of which the correct classification in terms of subtypes and aetiological mechanisms is a pivotal prerequisite, as is the assessment of the patient's cardiovascular risk profile. In addition to the evaluation of pathomechanisms, stratification of subtypes of brain infarction is mainly based on morphology seen with brain imaging techniques, which provides additional evidence for the presumed cause of the stroke. Inhibitors of platelet function and anticoagulants are the two major groups of antithrombotic drugs used for the secondary prevention of stroke. Antiplatelet agents are still indicated in the majority of patients after ischaemic stroke, especially if an arterial origin is presumed. In addition to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), the position of which as the first-line antiplatelet drug is increasingly being questioned, other compounds with antiplatelet activity have been developed and have proven effective in secondary stroke prevention, including ticlopidine, clopidogrel and dipyridamole. Anticoagulants are principally indicated after cardioembolic ischaemic stroke; however, their inherent bleeding risks render their use in many cases rather difficult, in particular for elderly patients. Patient compliance with the recommended treatment is of major importance, given the somewhat limited efficacy of antithrombotic agents in stroke prevention. Since 'real world' experience does not match the circumstances under which clinical trials are conducted, this article will also deal with problems not covered by specific studies, such as risk stratification for anticoagulant treatment and how to proceed in cases of unknown stroke aetiology. The management of major cardiovascular risk factors is the other mainstay of secondary stroke prevention. Recent evidence indicates that antihypertensive treatment may be as effective as antithrombotic drugs for secondary prevention of stroke. This still needs to be proven for the treatment of other cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and hypercholesterolemia. Nevertheless, the results of recent studies investigating the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors ('statins') on cardiovascular events strongly suggest a stroke-preventive effect.     

How Do HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors Prevent Stroke?

Stroke is a heterogeneous disorder with significantly high morbidity and mortality. The relationship between serum cholesterol level and the incidence of stroke remains controversial. Recent evidence from primary and secondary prevention trials suggests that treatment with hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors may reduce the incidence of stroke in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In this review, we attempt to outline and describe the potential mechanisms of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in the prevention of stroke. In addition to their lipid-lowering action HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors appear to exert their beneficial effects by various nonlipid-lowering mechanisms including anti-inflammatory effects, effect on endothelial function and coagulation cascade. Treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is associated with decreased progression, plaque stablilization and even regression of atheromatous plaque in the carotid arteries. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors also inhibit the coagulation cascade at various levels such as activation of prothrombin, factor V, factor X and liberation of tissue factor in response to vascular injury. Inhibition of fibrinolysis occurs secondary to inhibition of plasmin generation. Pravastatin therapy is associated with a reduction in the size of aortic atheroma which is an independent risk factor for stroke. Lastly, left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction is associated with an increased risk of stroke and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may indirectly decrease the incidence of stroke by reducing coronary events. Most of these effects are independent of the cholesterol-lowering effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. In conclusion, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may have a role in primary prevention of stroke in patients with CAD.     

The relationship between cholesterol and stroke: implications for antihyperlipidaemic therapy in older patients

Various studies on the relationship between serum cholesterol level and the risk of stroke have been published recently. Subsequent reviews have extrapolated information on stroke from the clinical trials originally aimed at lowering cholesterol for the primary and secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) in middle-aged patients. We have reviewed the epidemiological knowledge on the relationship between serum cholesterol levels and stroke, and also focused on possible reduction of the risk of stroke with hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor treatment. Possible benefits from such therapy are particularly relevant for the elderly population which is at particularly high risk for stroke. The effects of serum cholesterol levels on the risk for haemorrhagic and ischaemic stroke have been evaluated. Indirect epidemiological evidence indicates that serum levels of total cholesterol and its subfractions are determinants of stroke, but their associations are relatively weak. When exploring the possible association of serum cholesterol levels with the increased risk of stroke with aging, we concluded that, as in younger adults, elevated total cholesterol and decreased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol levels predispose to ischaemic stroke in the elderly. The mechanism through which serum cholesterol levels increase stroke risk is based on its actions on the artery walls. Indirect evidence suggests that the reduction in the stroke risk with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors is larger than would be expected with reduction of elevated serum cholesterol level alone. Therefore, antioxidant and endothelium-stabilising properties of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors may contribute in reducing the risk of stroke in recipients. Lowering high serum cholesterol with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors has been beneficial in the primary and secondary prevention of MI. No trials have specifically tested the effect of cholesterol lowering with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on stroke occurrence. High serum cholesterol levels are a risk factor for ischaemic stroke, although the risk imparted is lower than that for MI. Although the relative risk of stroke associated with elevated serum cholesterol levels is only moderate, its population attributable risk is high given the increase in the elderly population worldwide. The effect of cholesterol reduction with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on prevention of ischaemic stroke should be evaluated in prospective, randomised, placebo-controlled trials in the elderly. The tolerability of lipid-lowering drugs in the elderly and the cost effectiveness of primary prevention of stroke using lipid-lowering drugs also needs to be assessed in the elderly.     

Prevention of ischaemic stroke--antiplatelets

Aspirin is the treatment of first choice for long-term secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with confirmed non-cardioembolic ischaemic stroke or TIA. However, there is no good evidence that it is of benefit in primary stroke prevention. If aspirin is contra-indicated, dipyridamole monotherapy is a relatively cheap, but slightly less effective, alternative. Aspirin and dipyridamole have an additive effect in secondary stroke prevention, but there is a high incidence of side effects and subsequent discontinuation of treatment with combination therapy. It is reasonable to consider clopidogrel for secondary prevention of vascular events in patients with ischaemic stroke who are intolerant of aspirin or dipyridamole, or who have a history of ischaemic heart disease. However, its cost is considerable. Over the next decade, oral antiplatelet agents directed against specific platelet receptors, or a combination of antiplatelet drugs inhibiting different aspects of platelet function, may improve secondary prevention of stroke.     

Antithrombotic drugs for secondary stroke prophylaxis

Stroke is the third most common cause of adult mortality in the United States. Antithrombotic agents form the mainstay of stroke prevention. Aspirin produces a modest reduction in the risk of second stroke and is widely recommended for initial therapy. The thienopyridines ticlopidine and clopidogrel are alternatives for secondary prevention in patients who do not respond to or cannot take aspirin. They are no more effective than aspirin and have been associated with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. The combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole has several mechanisms of action and an additive effect on reducing stroke risk compared with either agent alone. A 2-fold increase in risk reduction and favorable safety profile suggest that the combination can serve as first-line prophylaxis against a second stroke.     

Ticlopidine: a second look. No further use in routine practice

(1) The clinical file on ticlopidine is based mainly on a placebo-controlled trial involving patients with lower-limb arterial disease, and two large double-blind trials in the post-stroke period, in which the comparator was a placebo in one and aspirin in the other. (2) Ticlopidine proved more effective than the placebo in both indications. In secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke, ticlopidine has a moderate advantage over aspirin in terms of efficacy but carries a risk of serious adverse effects, especially haematological. (3) An indirect comparison suggests that clopidogrel, another antiplatelet drug chemically close to ticlopidine, has comparable efficacy in cardiovascular prevention and no severe adverse effects to date.     

Statins in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke

3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (also known as statins) are drugs active in the blockade of cholesterol synthesis and thus lowering cholesterol serum levels. Since their discovery, experimental evidence showed that statins strongly reduced atherogenesis and the risk of acute ischemic complications, such as acute myocardial infarction and stroke. More recently, direct anti-atherosclerotic effects of statins (independently of lipid profile improvement) have been also shown, suggesting new potential applications for these drugs in both primary and secondary prevention of acute cardiovascular events. Despite some controversies exist, the use of statins has been shown to improve both incidence and survival in acute ischemic stroke. The molecular mechanisms underlying statin-mediated clinical benefits were recently identified in the reduction of carotid plaque vulnerability and the increase of neuroprotection. In the present review, we will update evidence on the promising results with statins to improve ischemic stroke outcomes.     

Antiplatelet drugs in cardiovascular prevention: take adverse effects and costs into account

(1) Several antiplatelet drugs have proven preventive efficacy, including aspirin, aspirin + dipyridamole, clopidogrel, ticlopidine and flurbiprofen. They differ mainly in their adverse effects and costs. (2) Aspirin has essentially gastrointestinal adverse effects, whose incidence can be limited by prescribing a daily dose below 350 mg. (3) The addition of dipyridamole to aspirin can cause headache and diarrhoea. (4) Ticlopidine should be avoided because of the risk of agranulocytosis. (5) Adverse effects are less frequent and less severe with clopidogrel than with ticlopidine. (6) Like other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, flurbiprofen has mainly gastrointestinal adverse effects. (7) Treatment is least costly with low-dose aspirin and most costly with clopidogrel.     

Dual antiplatelet therapy for prevention of recurrent ischemic events.

The advantages of dual antiplatelet therapy over monotherapy in preventing recurrent ischemic events are examined. Atherosclerosis is an insidious systemic process involving multiple vascular beds, including the cerebral, coronary, and peripheral arteries. Atherosclerotic plaque rupture is one of the inciting events in the progression of platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Patients with any clinical manifestation of atherosclerosis are vulnerable to others in different vascular beds since the disease develops throughout the vasculature, and different vascular events have common predisposing risk factors. Ischemic coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease are two of the three most frequent causes of death in the United States. The efficacy of aspirin in the secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke has been demonstrated in numerous trials. While dipyridamole has not been linked with a greater odds reduction than aspirin in the development of MI, stroke, and vascular death, ticlopidine and clopidogrel have been associated with a greater reduction in the development of acute MI, stroke, and vascular death than aspirin. Clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of combination antiplatelet therapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events are ongoing. The rationale for using a combination of two mechanistically different antiplatelet agents is supported by ex vivo and clinical studies. Inhibition of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation is enhanced with dual antiplatelet therapy. Combination antiplatelet regimens with different mechanisms of action to inhibit multiple sites in the thrombotic pathway may further improve long-term clinical outcomes. Dual antiplatelet therapy may have advantages over monotherapy in the prevention of recurrent ischemic events.     

Adverse effects and drug interactions of antithrombotic agents used in prevention of ischaemic stroke

Stroke is the third most common cause of death in the US. Primary prevention of stroke can be achieved by control of risk factors including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, elevated cholesterol levels and smoking. Approximately one-third of all ischaemic strokes occur in patients with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The mainstay of secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke is the addition of medical therapy with antithrombotic agents to control the risk factors for stroke. Antithrombotic therapy is associated with significant medical complications, particularly bleeding.Low-dose aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) has been shown to be as effective as high-dose aspirin in the prevention of stroke, with fewer adverse bleeding events. Aspirin has been shown to be as effective as warfarin in the prevention of noncardioembolic ischaemic stroke, with significantly fewer bleeding complications. Ticlopidine may be more effective in preventing stroke than aspirin, but is associated with unacceptable haematological complications. Clopidogrel may have some benefit over aspirin in preventing myocardial infarction, but has not been shown to be superior to aspirin in the prevention of stroke. The combination of clopidogrel and aspirin may be more effective than aspirin alone in acute coronary syndromes, but the incidence of adverse bleeding is significantly higher. Furthermore, the combination of aspirin with clopidogrel has not been shown to be more effective for prevention of recurrent stroke than clopidogrel alone, while the rate of bleeding complications was significantly higher with combination therapy. The combination of aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole has been demonstrated to be more effective than aspirin alone, with the same rate of adverse bleeding complications as low-dose aspirin. When selecting the appropriate antithrombotic agent for secondary prevention of stroke, the adverse event profile of the drug must be taken into account when assessing the overall efficacy of the treatment plan.     

In vitro effects of clopidogrel on the platelet-subendothelium interaction, platelet thromboxane and endothelial prostacyclin production, and nitric oxide synthesis

Clopidogrel is an antiplatelet drug that belongs to the group of thienopyridines. Because of its main mechanism of action most studies of clopidogrel have centered on the platelet ADP pathway. The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of clopidogrel, ticlopidine, and aspirin, on platelet activation by collagen (the main inducer of platelet activation in vivo), prostanoid, and NO production, and the effects on blood perfusion experiments. Clopidogrel inhibited platelet aggregation induced in whole blood by collagen and TxB2 production to a greater extent than did ticlopidine. Prostacyclin synthesis did not change after incubation with thienopyridines, whereas aspirin inhibited synthesis in a dose-dependent manner. Thienopyridines increased NO production to a greater extent than did aspirin. All three drugs impaired the platelet-subendothelium interaction under flow conditions. With thienopyridines, the presence of endothelium did not modify the percentage of the surface coated by platelets.     

Clopidogrel: new preparation. An alternative to aspirin

(1) Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet drug chemically similar to ticlopidine, is marketed in France for secondary prevention of thrombotic complications in patients with a history of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke or peripheral arterial disease. (2) Marketing authorisation was based mainly on the CAPRIE trial, a study that involved 19,815 patients. In this trial of secondary cardiovascular prevention, clopidogrel was slightly more effective than aspirin (325 mg/day) according to a statistical analysis of a combined end point (ischaemic stroke, or myocardial infarction, or death of vascular causes). The difference was more marked in the subgroup of patients with obstructive arterial disease of the lower limbs. (3) Clopidogrel was well tolerated in this trial. The only adverse effects more frequent on clopidogrel than on aspirin were rash and diarrhoea. (4) Clopidogrel showed no haematological toxicity, an adverse effect that restricts the use of ticlopidine. (5) The lack of long-term follow-up in real clinical settings prevents any meaningful estimation of the safety profile or of the risk of drug interactions.     

Clopidogrel: a review of its use in the prevention of atherothrombosis

Clopidogrel is an ADP receptor antagonist that is indicated for the reduction of atherosclerotic events including myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and vascular death in patients with atherosclerosis manifested by recent stroke, myocardial infarction or established peripheral vascular disease. In the 19 185 patients enrolled in the multicentre, randomised double-blind CAPRIE study, the annual risk of the combined end-point of ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction and death from vascular disease (vascular death) was significantly lower during treatment with clopidogrel 75 mg/day than aspirin 325 mg/day [5.3 vs 5.8%/year, respectively; relative risk reduction (RRR) 8.7%, p = 0.043] after a mean follow-up of 1.9 years. Clopidogrel provided even greater reductions in the risk of recurrent ischaemic events than aspirin in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery, diabetes mellitus and in those receiving concomitant lipid-lowering therapy. Moreover there was a significant reduction in the incidence of hospitalisation in patients treated with clopidogrel. In a patient population (Saskatchewan, Canada) with a greater risk of ischaemic events than the CAPRIE study population, the number of patients needed to be treated with clopidogrel to prevent 1 ischaemic event was estimated to be 70 (vs 200 in the CAPRIE study). In randomised trials and registry surveys, clopidogrel 75 mg/day plus aspirin had similar efficacy (as measured by adverse cardiac outcomes) to ticlopidine 250mg twice daily plus aspirin during the 30 days after placement of intracoronary stents. Tolerability of clopidogrel was significantly better than ticlopidine in the randomised, double-blind CLASSICS study. Among patients treated with clopidogrel or aspirin in the CAPRIE study, the overall gastrointestinal tolerability of clopidogrel was generally better than that of aspirin; the frequency of gastrointestinal haemorrhage was significantly lower among patients treated with clopidogrel than aspirin. Diarrhoea, rash and pruritis were significantly more common with clopidogrel than aspirin. CONCLUSION: Clopidogrel was significantly more effective than aspirin in the prevention of vascular events (ischaemic stroke, myocardial infarction or vascular death) [corrected] in patients with atherothrombotic disease manifested by recent myocardial infarction, recent ischaemic stroke or symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease [corrected] in the CAPRIE study. The overall tolerability profile of the drug was similar to that of aspirin, although gastrointestinal haemorrhage occurred significantly less often in clopidogrel recipients. The drug is widely used in combination with aspirin for the prevention of atherothrombosis after placement of intravascular stents, and available data suggest that this combination is as effective as ticlopidine plus aspirin for this indication.     

Statins and neuroprotection

The beneficial effect of β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors (statins) in primary prevention of coronary artery disease in those with hypercholesterolaemia and in secondary prevention in those with established coronary vascular disease are now well known. A growing body of evidence suggests that statins also possess important additional clinical benefits, such as stroke risk reduction. In this article we review the evidence that statins may be neuroprotective, especially in the brain parenchyma during stroke. We also review the observational data that statins may prevent the onset of dementia.     

Intracellular signaling as a potential target for antiplatelet therapy

Three classes of inhibitors of platelet aggregation have demonstrated substantial clinical benfits. Aspirin acts by irreversibly inhibiting COX-1 and therefore blocking the synthesis of proaggregatory thromboxane A (2) (TxA(2)). The indirect acting (ticlopidine, clopidogrel, prasugrel) and the direct acting (ticagrelor) antagonists of P2Y(12) block the thrombus stabilizing activity of ADP. Parenteral GP IIb-IIIa inhibitors directly block platelet-platelet interactions. Despite well-established benefits, all antiplatelet agents have important limitations: increased bleeding and gastrointestinal toxicities (aspirin), high incidence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (ticlopidine), potentially nonresponders (clopidogrel), severe bleeding (prasugrel, GP IIb-IIIa antagonists) and "complicated" relationships with aspirin ticagrelor). In this chapter, we present the genetic and pharmacological evidence that supports the development and expectations associated with novel antiplatelet strategies directed at intrasignaling pathways.     

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of acute coronary syndromes

The benefit of aspirin use in the emergent care of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been well-established. Recent studies have further demonstrated the importance of antiplatelet therapy in the acute setting, primarily with the use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Aspirin and the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) are oral antiplatelet agents that interfere with platelet activation in complementary, but separate pathways. Combination therapy of aspirin with other antiplatelet agents has demonstrated a benefit for the management of ACS. This article reviews the pathophysiology of platelet activation in ACS, landmark trials regarding antiplatelet agents, and the current recommendations for the use of both intravenous and oral antiplatelet agents in the management of patients with ACS.     

The role of antiplatelet therapy in the management of acute coronary syndromes

The benefit of aspirin use in the emergent care of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) has been well-established. Recent studies have further demonstrated the importance of antiplatelet therapy in the acute setting, primarily with the use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor inhibitors. Aspirin and the thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) are oral antiplatelet agents that interfere with platelet activation in complementary, but separate pathways. Combination therapy of aspirin with other antiplatelet agents has demonstrated a benefit for the management of ACS. This article reviews the pathophysiology of platelet activation in ACS, landmark trials regarding antiplatelet agents, and the current recommendations for the use of both intravenous and oral antiplatelet agents in the management of patients with ACS.