Relationship of free nortriptyline levels to therapeutic response

The relationship between the free plasma concentration of nortriptyline and therapeutic response was examined. Eighteen depressed inpatients were treated for 21 days with steady state total nortriptyline plasma concentrations between 50-150 ng/ml. Steady state free nortriptyline concentrations were measured. The therapeutic nortriptyline response was measured by administering the Hamilton and the Carroll Rating scales at day zero and day 21. Statistical relationships between free levels of drug and clinical response were found to be insignificant. Qualitative assessment of the data suggest that free serum levels of nortriptyline in excess of 10 ng/ml may have an inhibitory effect on clinical response.     

Valpromide-amitriptyline interaction. Increase in the bioavailability of amitriptyline and nortriptyline caused by valpromide

Valpromide is largely used in the therapy of affective disorders for its presumed thymoregulating activity. So, it is often associated with tricyclic antidepressant treatment. Previous clinical studies lead us to consider the possibility of an interaction between valpromide and tricyclic antidepressants, interaction which could result in an increase of antidepressant plasma concentrations. But no pharmacokinetic study has been realized up to now in order to clearly demonstrate such a phenomenon. The authors studied amitriptyline and nortriptyline plasma levels in two groups of ten patients receiving 125 mg amitriptyline, once a day, during 20 days. In the second group, patients also received 600 mg valpromide daily after ten days on amitriptyline. In the first group amitriptyline and nortriptyline plasma concentrations remained stable between the tenth and the twentieth day. In the second group, addition of valpromide resulted in a significant increase of antidepressant plasma levels: from 70.5 +/- 35 to 105.5 +/- 49 ng/ml (p less than 0.0003) for amitriptyline, and from 61.0 +/- 34 to 100.5 +/- 65 ng/ml (p less than 0.01) for nortriptyline.     

Drug treatment of depression in frail elderly nursing home residents.

The authors conducted a randomized, double-blind, 10-week clinical trial of two doses of nortriptyline in eight nursing homes. Sixty-nine patients, average age 79.5 years, were randomized to receive regular doses (60 mg-80 mg/day) vs. low doses (10 mg-13 mg/day) of nortriptyline. Among the more cognitively intact patients, there was a significant quadratic relationship defining a "therapeutic window" for nortriptyline plasma levels and clinical improvement. There were also significant differences in plasma level-response relationships between depressed patients who were cognitively impaired and those who were more cognitively intact. Depression remains a syndrome that responds to specific treatment, even in frail nursing home patients, and those depressions that occur in patients with significant dementia may represent a treatment-relevant condition with a different plasma level-response relationship than in depression alone.     

Plasma levels of nortriptyline and 10-hydroxynortriptyline and treatment-related electrocardiographic changes in the elderly depressed

Thirty-one elderly depressed patients were treated for seven weeks with nortriptyline with plasma levels kept between 50-180 ng/ml. Electrocardiograms were taken at the third and seventh weeks of treatment. There were significant increases in the PR interval, QTc interval, and heart rate from before and after treatment. However, there were no consistent correlations between electrocardiographic changes during treatment and plasma levels of nortriptyline, 10-hydroxynortriptyline and either of its two isomers (E-10-hydroxynortriptyline, Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline). Increased QRS duration after seven weeks of treatment was correlated with daily dose of nortriptyline.     

Plasma levels, psychophysiological variables, and clinical response to amitriptyline

Hamilton depression scale ratings and physiological measurements were made for 37 patients with primary depression before treatment with amitriptyline (150 mg/day) and again after 2 and 4 weeks of treatment; plasma drug levels were determined weekly. Improvement was maximal at mean amitriptyline + nortriptyline concentrations of 125-200 ng/ml (14 patients), while at lower levels the outcome was significantly poorer (12 patients). Highly variable results were seen in 11 patients with levels between 200 and 301 ng/ml, with lesser improvement occurring in those patients who exhibited poor habituation of the skin resistance response before treatment. Other psychophysiological variables showed significant changes during treatment, but no correlation with clinical results or drug levels.     

A twelve-week, double-blind, randomized comparison of nortriptyline and paroxetine in older depressed inpatients and outpatients.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors may be less efficacious than tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of severe depression in older patients. The authors compared the 12-week clinical outcome of older depressed patients treated with nortriptyline or paroxetine in a double-blind randomized comparison in 116 psychiatric inpatients and outpatients (mean age: 72+/-8 years) who presented with a major depressive episode or melancholic depression. Discontinuation and response rates were compared in patients who began or who completed treatment. The discontinuation rate due to side effects was significantly higher with nortriptyline than with paroxetine (33% vs. 16%). There were no significant differences between the rates of response in the Intent-to-Treat analysis (nortriptyline: 57% vs. paroxetine: 55% ), or the Completer analysis (nortriptyline: 78% vs. paroxetine: 84%). Although paroxetine appears to be better tolerated than nortriptyline, the efficacy of these two drugs does not appear to differ in the acute treatment of older depressed patients, including hospitalized patients and those with melancholic features.     

Somatic symptoms in treatment-resistant depression

The purpose of this work was to study the prevalence of somatic symptoms in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) and their impact on the response to antidepressant treatment. Somatic symptoms were assessed during the screen visit with the Symptom Questionnaire (SQ) somatic symptom (SQ-SS) and somatic well-being sub-scales (SQ-SWB) in 40 patients with TRD enrolled in a 6-week open trial of nortriptyline. A logistic regression was used to test whether SQ-SS or SQ-SWB scores predicted clinical response to nortriptyline. Ninety-five percent of patients reported at least one somatic symptom. Higher SQ-SS scores during the screen visit predicted poorer response to nortriptyline. There was a trend for lower SQ-SWB scores to predict poor response to nortriptyline. None of the patients with SQ-SS scores above the mean for the sample responded to nortriptyline. The overwhelming majority of patients with TRD presented with somatic symptoms. In addition, a greater number of somatic symptoms during the screen visit placed patients at risk for further treatment resistance.     

Heuristic comparison of sertraline with nortriptyline for the treatment of depression in frail elderly patients.

Studies have demonstrated that the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressants have similar efficacy to other agents, such as tricyclic antidepressants. However, data are limited for direct comparisons with other antidepressants. The authors conducted a contemporaneous comparison of nursing home residents treated with open-label sertraline in doses up to 100 mg/day with nursing home residents treated in a double-blind randomized study of low vs. regular doses of nortriptyline. There were 97 patients enrolled in the study (28 treated with sertraline), with an average treatment duration of 55 days. There were no differences in the tolerability of sertraline vs. nortriptyline. However, in this group of frail older adults, sertraline was not as effective as nortriptyline for the treatment of depression.     

Accelerating antidepressant response in geriatric depression: a post hoc comparison of combined sleep deprivation and paroxetine versus monotherapy with paroxetine, nortriptyline, or placebo.

Speed of response is an important clinical issue in the treatment of depressed elderly patients. Our objective was to compare rapid response rates in a study combining therapeutic sleep deprivation (TSD) with paroxetine with two earlier randomized, double-blind studies in late-life depression, one of paroxetine versus nortriptyline and another of nortriptyline versus placebo. We measured depressive symptoms with the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale of Depression (HRSD), defining rapid response as an HRSD < or = 10 by 2 weeks. With combination therapy (TSD + paroxetine), 9 of 13 patients (69%) experienced a rapid response. In the nortriptyline versus paroxetine study, nortriptyline brought about rapid response in 12 of 37 (32%) and paroxetine in 11 of 43 patients (26%). In the third study, rapid response to nortriptyline occurred in 10 of 41 patients (24%) and to placebo in 6 of 39 patients (15%). The overall chi square, including the rate of rapid response to placebo, was 14.87 (P = .005). The chi square on the four active treatment groups, excluding placebo, was 10.28 (P = .016). This preliminary observation suggests that combined therapy with TSD plus paroxetine may be twice as successful at achieving rapid response in elderly depressed patients than conventional monotherapy with medication or placebo. A prospective, placebo-controlled evaluation of this dual therapy is warranted.     

Nortriptyline in geriatric depression resistant to serotonin reuptake inhibitors: case series

Research on treatment-resistant depression in the elderly has been limited, and recommendations for clinical management have often been extrapolated from studies using nongeriatric patients. This report describes a series of 10 elderly patients with refractory depression who were treated with nortriptyline after failing to respond to an adequate trial of a serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Seven (70%) of the patients responded to the addition or substitution of nortriptyline. All seven of the responders have remained on nortriptyline for maintenance therapy, none of whom have experienced recurrence of their depression after an average treatment duration of 1 year. Response to nortriptyline occurred in about 4 weeks in most patients. The mean daily dose of nortriptyline was 54 mg, and the mean plasma level was 97 ng/mL. Minor side effects occurred in three patients. No patients developed significant electrocardiogram changes. Nortriptyline, possibly due to its different mechanism of action, may be effective as either an adjunctive or replacement antidepressant in some cases of geriatric depression that are resistant to serotonin reuptake inhibitors.     

Age and nortriptyline concentrations in plasma ultrafiltrate

OBJECTIVES: Since plasma protein binding of tricyclic antidepressants may be relevant to treatment effects and can be influenced by age-associated factors, we examined both plasma ultrafiltrate and total concentrations of nortriptyline (NT) in patients and compared these to age. We hypothesized negative associations with age of both ultrafiltrate NT and the ratio of ultrafiltrate NT to total plasma NT. METHODS: Patients with major depression at a psychiatric service treated with a stable dose of NT were studied. Trough plasma ultrafiltrate NT concentrations and total plasma NT concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Concentrations were corrected for dose. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients aged 26 - 88 years were studied. Ultrafiltrate NT concentrations and the ratio of ultrafiltrate NT to total NT concentrations were both significantly negatively associated with age. Total NT concentrations were not significantly associated with age. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively low ultrafiltrate NT concentrations in older patients may reflect lower tissue exposure at a given total plasma NT concentration. This could be relevant to toxic and therapeutic effects. Studies of relationships between non-bound drug concentrations and NT treatment outcomes across the age span are needed.     

Antidepressant-induced weight gain: a comparison study of four medications

Body weight change was monitored in 73 hospitalized depressed patients treated with one of four antidepressants for 1 month. After a 2-week medication-free period, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with amitriptyline, nortriptyline, desipramine, or zimelidine. By the end of 1 month, treatment with all three tricyclic compounds promoted weight gain, with the greatest increase observed during amitriptyline treatment; less weight was gained by patients treated with nortriptyline and desipramine. In contrast, most patients treated with zimelidine showed no weight gain and, in many cases, demonstrated weight loss. Weight change during treatment was not associated with age, sex, severity of depression, obesity, weight loss during depression, or clinical response.     

Patterns and predictors of remission,response and recovery in major depression treated with fluoxetine or nortriptyline

OBJECTIVE: The first objective of this paper was to describe the pattern of remission, response and recovery in patients with major depression who were randomised for treatment with fluoxetine ornortriptyline. The second objective was to report on the demographic and diagnostic predictors of the response and recovery in these depressed patients. METHOD: One hundred and ninety-five patients with major depression were recruited for this outpatient study. After a detailed clinical and neurobiological evaluation patients were randomized to receive either fluoxetine or nortiptyline as an initial antidepressant treatment. RESULTS: Of the 195 depressed patients randomised to treatment,154 completed an adequate 6-week trial of either fluoxetine or nortriptyline as their initial antidepressant. Of the 41 patients who did not complete an adequate trial the dropout rate was higher on those randomized to nortriptyline (p = 0.02). There was also an important interaction of drug and gender in determining dropouts in that women did not complete an adequate trial with nortriptyline and men did not complete an adequate trial with fluoxetine (p = 0.002).Of the 154 patients who completed an adequate 6-week antidepressant trial there were no significant differences in 6-week measures of depression severity or of percentage improvement. However, if we use an intention to treat analysis and dichotomise outcomes into response,remission or recovery; then recovery rates were significantly higher with fluoxetine than nortriptyline (p = 0.005).Using an intention to treat analysis fluoxetine was superior tonortriptyline in women, in those less than 25-years old, and in those with atypical depression. Independent of drug, those with chronic depressions had a poorer outcome. CONCLUSION: In this sample of depressed patients randomized tonortriptyline or fluoxetine the change in depressive symptoms over 6 weeks were comparable between fluoxetine and nortriptyline. However,when we look at the more clinically important variable of recovery then fluoxetine was superior to nortriptyline. Predictors of a poorer response to nortriptyline were gender, young age and atypical depression.The results challenge traditional beliefs that selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and tricyclic antidepressant have comparable efficacy.     

Nortriptyline versus fluoxetine in the treatment of depression and in short-term recovery after stroke: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study

OBJECTIVE: This study compared nortriptyline and fluoxetine with placebo in the treatment of depression and in recovery from physical and cognitive impairments after stroke. METHOD: A total of 104 patients with acute stroke enrolled between 1991 and 1997 entered a double-blind randomized study comparing nortriptyline, fluoxetine, and placebo over 12 weeks of treatment. The majority of patients were recruited from a rehabilitation hospital in Des Moines, Iowa, but other enrollment sites were also used. Both depressed and nondepressed patients were enrolled to determine whether improved recovery could be mediated by mechanisms unrelated to depression. Nortriptyline in doses of 25 mg/day gradually increased to 100 mg/day or fluoxetine in doses of 10 mg/day gradually increased to 40 mg/day or identical placebo were given over 12 weeks. Response to treatment of depression for individual patients was defined as a greater-than-50% reduction in scores on the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and no longer fulfilling diagnostic criteria for major or minor depression. Improved recovery for a treatment group was defined as a significantly higher mean score from baseline to end of the treatment trial, compared with patients treated with placebo, on measures of impairment in activities of daily living and levels of cognitive and social functioning. RESULTS: Nortriptyline produced a significantly higher response rate than fluoxetine or placebo in treating poststroke depression, in improving anxiety symptoms, and in improving recovery of activities of daily living as measured by the Functional Independence Measure. There was no effect of nortriptyline or fluoxetine on recovery of cognitive or social functioning among depressed or nondepressed patients. Fluoxetine in increasing doses of 10-40 mg/day led to an average weight loss of 15. 1 pounds (8% of initial body weight) over 12 weeks of treatment that was not seen with nortriptyline or placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Given the doses of medication used in this study, nortriptyline was superior to fluoxetine in the treatment of poststroke depression. Demonstrating a benefit of antidepressant treatment in recovery from stroke may require the identification of specific subgroups of patients, alternative measurement scales, or the optimal time of treatment.     

Treatment of poststroke generalized anxiety disorder comorbid with poststroke depression: merged analysis of nortriptyline trials.

OBJECTIVE: The existence of anxiety disorders plays an important role in the prognosis and associated impairment among patients with poststroke depression. The authors examined the efficacy of nortriptyline treatment for patients with comorbid generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and depression after stroke. METHODS: Data from three studies were merged to provide 27 patients with comorbid GAD and depression, who participated in double-blind treatment studies comparing nortriptyline (N=13) and placebo (N=14). Severity of anxiety was measured with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (Ham-A), and severity of depression was measured with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (Ham-D). Activities of daily living were assessed by use of the Johns Hopkins Functioning Inventory (JHFI). RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the nortriptyline and placebo groups in demographic characteristics, stroke type, and neurological findings. Patients receiving nortriptyline treatment showed significantly greater improvement on the Ham-A, Ham-D, and JHFI than patients receiving placebo. The anxiety symptoms showed earlier improvement than depressive symptoms in patients treated with nortriptyline. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that poststroke GAD comorbid with poststroke depression may be effectively treated with nortriptyline, and data indicate the need for a trial specifically designed to examine treatment of anxiety disorder.     

Three-year outcomes of maintenance nortriptyline treatment in late-life depression: a study of two fixed plasma levels.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the long-term efficacy of two fixed plasma levels of nortriptyline in preventing or delaying recurrence of major depression in elderly patients and in minimizing residual depressive symptoms and somatic complaints. METHOD: The authors randomly assigned 41 elderly patients with histories of recurrent major depression to 3-year, double-blind maintenance pharmacotherapy using nortriptyline, with controlled plasma concentrations of 80-120 ng/ml versus 40-60 ng/ml. The authors compared times to, and rates of, recurrence of major depression. They also compared frequencies of side effects, noncompliance episodes, and subsyndromal symptomatic flare-ups. RESULTS: Major depressive episodes recurred for six (29%) of 21 subjects in the 80-120-ng/ml condition and eight (40%) of 20 subjects in the 40-60-ng/ml condition, a nonsignificant difference. Most recurrences took place in the first year of maintenance treatment. Hamilton depression scores in the subsyndromal range (higher than either 10 or 7) occurred significantly more often at 40-60 ng/ml, while constipation occurred significantly more often at 80-120 ng/ml. The proportions of patients reporting missed doses did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance pharmacotherapy with nortriptyline at 80-120 ng/ml is associated with fewer residual depressive symptoms, that is, a less variable long-term response, than pharmacotherapy at 40-60 ng/ml, but constipation is more frequent and there is no difference in recurrence of syndromal major depressive episodes. Treatment at 80-120 ng/ml may be preferable, because of fewer residual symptoms and less variability of response, as long as side effect burden can be managed successfully.     

Treating delusional depressives with amitriptyline

Thirty-five delusional depressed patients were treated for either 28 or 35 days with amitriptyline. The 12 responders could not be differentiated from the nonresponders on a variety of demographic and clinical characteristics. Patients with amitriptyline+nortriptyline plasma levels above 250 ng/ml were significantly more likely to be responders than were patients with levels below that value (p less than .05). A review of the relevant literature revealed that, although some delusional depressives do respond to treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, the presence of delusions is a predictor of poor response to tricyclic antidepressants.     

Preventing poststroke depression: a 12-week double-blind randomized treatment trial and 21-month follow-up

This study examined the effect of antidepressants in preventing depression after stroke. Nondepressed poststroke patients (N = 48) were randomly assigned to receive nortriptyline, fluoxetine, or placebo for 3 months by using double-blind methodology and were followed-up for 21 months by using a naturalistic design. During the treatment period, one minor depression developed in the nortriptyline group (n = 13 at 3 months), one minor depression developed in the fluoxetine group (n = 13), and five minor depressions developed in the placebo group (n = 15; p <.05). When treatment was discontinued, nortriptyline-treated patients were more likely to develop depression and had significantly more severe depressive symptoms during the next 6 months compared with patients in the other two groups. Both nortriptyline and fluoxetine appeared to be efficacious in preventing depression after stroke. However, nortriptyline produced an increased vulnerability to depression for more than 6 months after it was discontinued. This finding suggests the need to extend prophylactic treatment and monitor patients carefully after the discontinuation of nortriptyline.     

Amitriptyline and nortriptyline plasma levels, urinary 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol and clinical response in depressed women

Thirty-eight depressed female inpatients, treated intramuscularly with 100 mg/day amitriptyline (AMT), were monitored to investigate the relationships between plasma levels of the drug and its metabolite nortriptyline (NT), the urinary excretion of 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG), side effects and clinical response. Considering the whole group, the clinical improvement was better within an intermediate range of AMT plus NT plasma concentrations (100-200 ng/ml). A more favorable outcome was also observed at NT plasma levels below 55 ng/ml. No significantly different percent clinical response among the patient clinical subgroups was observed as well as no significant correlations between MHPG decrease and drug plasma levels.     

A differential response to nortriptyline and fluoxetine in melancholic depression: the importance of age and gender

OBJECTIVE: To consider the impact of age and gender on the antidepressant response to nortriptyline and fluoxetine in melancholic depression. METHOD: Of 191 depressed patients, 113 met study criteria for melancholia. All patients were randomized to receive either fluoxetine or nortriptyline. Response rates, defined as an improvement of 60% or more on the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale over 6 weeks of antidepressant treatment on an intention to treat basis, were examined by age, and by age and gender. RESULTS: Melancholic depressed patients 40 years or older, especially men, had a markedly superior response to nortriptyline compared with fluoxetine. Conversely, melancholic depressed patients, age 18-24 years, especially women, had a markedly superior response to fluoxetine. CONCLUSION: Age and gender appear to be critical variables in understanding differential antidepressant responses to tricyclic antidepressants and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in melancholic depression.