Epinephrine improves expiratory flow rates in patients with asthma who do not respond to inhaled metaproterenol sulfate

One hundred patients with acute asthma and peak expiratory flow rates (PEFR) less than 150 L/min were randomized and treated in a double-blind treatment protocol with either metaproterenol sulfate aerosol (MPA) inhalation and placebo injection or epinephrine injection (EPI) and inhaled placebo at entry and at 30 and 60 minutes, and then were treated with the crossover comparison regimen at 120, 150, and 180 minutes. The two groups had similar entry PEFRs and FEV1 (MPA, 112 L/min; 0.94 L, respectively; EPI, 111 L/min; 0.85 L, respectively) and similar plasma theophylline levels (MPA, 12.2 micrograms/ml; EPI, 13.8 micrograms/ml). PEFR and FEV1 were measured every 30 minutes for 4 hours. Mean expiratory flow rates among both groups were similar at entry and at 120 and 240 minutes. At 120 minutes, flow rates had improved in 28/46 MPA-treated patients (61%) and 48/54 EPI-treated patients (89%). Among these improved patients, flow rates were significantly higher in the MPA-treated group. At 120 minutes, 18/46 MPA-treated patients (39%) and 6/54 EPI-treated patients (11%) had PEFRs less than 120 L/min and PEFR and FEV1 less than 120% of baseline values (p less than 0.01). In 13 of these 18 MPA-treated patients who did not improve compared to 1/6 EPI-treated patients who did not improve, PEFRs were greater than 120 L/min, and PEFR and FEV1 had increased 20% or more above baseline values after treatment with the crossover comparison regimen (p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Adherence rate to inhaled corticosteroids and their impact on asthma control

Background:  Poor asthma control is associated to high morbidity. The objective of this study was to assess the association between adherence rates to beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) and the degree of asthma control.
Methods:  A cohort concurrent study was carried out for 12 months with 122 asthmatic patients, aged 3–12 years, randomly selected in a pediatric pulmonology outpatient clinic, who received BDP free of charge. Adherence rates were verified by pharmacy records. Clinical control was assessed through a scoring system comprised four variables (nocturnal and morning symptoms, limitation of physical activities and exacerbations). Total score was 16 points. Patients whose score was below or equal to two were considered controlled (group 1), and patients whose score was above or equal to three were considered uncontrolled (group 2). For patients able to perform spirometry, we considered as controlled the patients with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁) equal to or above 80% of the predicted value, and as uncontrolled the patients with FEV₁ below 80%.
Results:  Fewer than half (40.3% maximum) of the 122 patients maintained asthma control. Median adherence rate of groups 1 and 2 were 85.5% and 33.8%, ( P  < 0.001) in the 4th month, 90.0% and 48.0% ( P  < 0.001) in the 8th month and 84.4% and 47.0% in the 12th month ( P  < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusion:  In all periods, there were statistically significant differences in adherence rates for maintaining or not maintaining the asthma control. Optimal asthma control entailed adherence rate higher than 80%. Strategies for reducing asthma morbidity should include a regular monitoring of adherence to inhaled steroids.     

Patients who do not receive continuity of care from their general practitioner--are they a vulnerable group?

BACKGROUND: Continuity of care is much valued by general practitioners but little is known about those patients who do not receive continuity of care. AIM: This study set out to identify and describe a group of patients who did not receive continuity of care from the general practitioner with whom they were personally registered. METHOD: A total of 110 patients (71 female and 39 male) were identified, who did not receive continuity of care, defined as four consecutive face to face consultations which did not take place with the doctor with whom they were registered. This group was compared with an age and sex matched control group who did receive continuity of care, using general practice records, for demographic characteristics, morbidity, relationship problems, number of 'difficult' consultations, failure to attend appointments, and use of an accident and emergency department and of open access clinics. RESULTS: Patients in the study group were more likely to be under the age of 65 years than all patients on the doctor's list. Study patients were more likely than control patients to be in social class 4 or 5 living in a council house. Patients in the study group were more likely than controls to be depressed. Women patients in the study group were more likely to suffer from vaginal discharge. Men patients in the study group were more likely to complain of non-cardiac chest pain. The study group had more marital problems, parent-child relationship problems, and problems involving violence in the family, as well as other relationship problems. Relationship problems included the relationship with the doctor, since a third of all the consultations in the study group were recorded as 'difficult', compared with 3% in the control group. The study group patients were more likely than controls not to attend appointments which they had made, to use the accident and emergency department repeatedly, and to have used other open access clinics. CONCLUSION: Lack of continuity of care is associated with some additional morbidity, an increased number of relationship problems, 'difficult' consultations, and non-attendances, and an increase in the use of open access clinics. The characteristics of this group of patients represent a syndrome which merits further study.     

Adherence to adding inhaled corticosteroids to rescue therapy in a pragmatic trial with adults with asthma: A pilot study

BackgroundUnderuse of guideline-recommended inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) controller therapy is a risk factor for greater asthma burden. ICS concomitantly used with rescue inhalers (Patient-Activated Reliever-Triggered ICS [‘PARTICS’]) reduced asthma exacerbations in efficacy trials, but whether PARTICS is effective in pragmatic trials is unknown.ObjectiveWe conducted this pilot to determine the feasibility of executing a large-scale pragmatic PARTICS trial and to improve study protocols.MethodsFour sites recruited 33 Hispanic or black adults with persistent asthma, randomized them approximately 3:1 to intervention or usual care, and followed them for 12 weeks. All participants received asthma guideline-based educational videos; intervention participants received video-based instructions on implementing PARTICS plus usual medications. The study involved 1 randomization visit and monthly questionnaires. Timely questionnaire responses (±2 weeks) were monitored. Participants underwent qualitative phone interviews to assess self-reported adherence to PARTICS and understand barriers to completing study procedures.ResultsTimely questionnaire response rates were 61%, 64%, and 70% at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, respectively. Self-reported adherence to PARTICS was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI], 58%-94% [n = 21]), 88% (95%CI, 72%-100% [n = 16]), and 62% (95%CI, 36%-88% [n = 13]) at weeks 1, 6, and 12, respectively. Barriers to completing study procedures included difficulties with questionnaire access, remembering to use ICS and rescue inhalers together, and obtaining refills. Only 22% of participants recognized their short-acting bronchodilator as “reliever” or “rescue.”ConclusionRecruitment was feasible within the allocated period. Adherence to PARTICS was incomplete, questionnaire completion was suboptimal, and common rescue inhaler nomenclature usage was limited. We have modified the full study protocol to attempt to improve adherence to PARTICS and minimize barriers to study procedures. Clinical trials registration: pilot study for ‘PeRson EmPowered Asthma Relief’ (PREPARE, NCT02995733)     

Impact of inhaled corticosteroids on cortisol suppression in adults with asthma: a quantitative review.

BACKGROUND: Studies examining the effects of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) on cortisol suppression show inconsistent results, and there is uncertainty regarding the dose-response relationship between ICSs and cortisol suppression. OBJECTIVE: To determine, using meta-analysis, the extent of cortisol suppression after administration of clinically relevant ICS doses in adults with asthma. METHODS: Database searches (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library) using appropriate indexed terms were performed to identify eligible articles for review. Articles reporting the effects of ICSs on cortisol levels in asthmatic adults, measured using the cumulative serum or plasma cortisol, morning serum or plasma cortisol, or cumulative overnight urinary free cortisol method, were identified. All available cortisol measurements were extracted. Cortisol suppression was estimated, and treatment arms were grouped into low-, medium-, and high-dose ranges according to the Global Initiative for Asthma guidelines. A multivariate model was used to determine relationships between ICS dose and cortisol suppression and to explore sources of heterogeneity among trials. RESULTS: Thirty-one studies providing information on 216 measures of cortisol suppression were included in this meta-analysis. Cortisol suppression in the low-, medium-, and high-dose groups were estimated to be 17.92% (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.08%-24.77%), 26.55% (95% CI, 17.29%-35.80%), and 36.31% (95% CI, 26.48%-46.13%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Statistically significant cortisol suppression was evident at low doses of ICSs and increased with dose. These results support an impact of all ICSs on endogenous cortisol levels and underscore the importance of titrating ICS doses to the minimum required to maintain symptom control.     

Local oropharyngeal side effects of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma

The widespread use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for the treatment of persistent asthma, although highly effective, may be associated with both systemic and local side effects. Systemic side effects of ICS have been extensively studied. In contrast, relatively few studies have been performed to specifically evaluate local side effects of ICS. These local side effects--including oropharyngeal candidiasis, dysphonia, pharyngitis, and cough--are generally viewed as minor complications of therapy. However, they can be clinically significant, affect patient quality of life, hinder compliance with therapy, and mask symptoms of more serious disease. Local side effects result from deposition of an active ICS in the oropharynx during administration of the drug. Numerous factors can influence the proportion of an inhaled dose that is deposited in the oropharyngeal cavity, including the ICS formulation, type of delivery system, and patient compliance with administration instructions. Therefore, the incidence of local side effects can vary widely. The goal in developing a new ICS is to include key pharmacologic characteristics that reduce oropharyngeal exposure to active drug while maintaining efficacy comparable with currently available ICS.     

Cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma: results from the asthma policy model.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids remain underused among United States-based clinicians in treating mild-to-moderate adult asthma. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to estimate the clinical impact, health-related quality of life, cost, and cost-effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroid therapy in a population of patients aged 18 years and over with FEV(1) = 60% to 100% of predicted normal. METHODS: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of quick relievers (eg, short-acting beta-agonists) on an as-needed basis plus inhaled corticosteroid therapy versus quick relievers alone. A mathematical simulation model was developed to forecast symptoms, acute exacerbations, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), health care costs, and cost-effectiveness, measured in both dollars per QALY gained and dollars per symptom-free day gained. All evaluation outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 3% and measured over a 10-year planning horizon. Data on the natural history of disease, drug efficacy, patient preferences, and economic costs were obtained from a variety of observational cohorts, randomized trials, and patient surveys. RESULTS: Over a 10-year period, use of inhaled corticosteroids increases total health costs from roughly $5,200 to $8,400 and improves QALYs from 6.8 to 7.0, implying an incremental cost of $13,500 per QALY gained. Costs per symptom-free day gained are $7.50. Both per-person acute exacerbations and hospitalizations are reduced by 33%. The cost-effectiveness findings are sensitive to the assumed efficacy and side-effects of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled corticosteroids appear to deliver good comparative value in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. Although more research is needed to understand their impact on preferences regarding side effects and compliance, these findings might be useful for priority-setting in limited resource situations.     

Air trapping in mild and moderate asthma: effect of inhaled corticosteroids

BACKGROUND: Air trapping reflects small airway obstruction in asthma and can be assessed quantitatively by high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone dipropionate (HFA-BDP) is deposited across all sizes of airways, including the small ones. However, its long-term effect on air trapping remains unknown in uncontrolled asthma. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of inhaled corticosteroids of different particle size - HFA-BDP and fluticasone propionate (FP) - on lung attenuation in mild-to-moderate uncontrolled asthma. METHODS: A randomized study was performed to analyze the effect of HFA-BDP (400 microg/d) or FP (500 microg/d) given over a period of 3 months to patients with uncontrolled mild-to-moderate asthma. HRCT was performed with spirometric gating, and lung attenuation was measured at residual volume and at pulmonary total capacity. The difference between inspiratory and expiratory attenuation was calculated as an air trapping index. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of 58 patients had abnormal air trapping and could be included in the study. Lung attenuation significantly diminished in the posterior zones of the lung after a 3-month treatment with HFA-BDP or FP, but the difference between the groups was not significant. Adjusted mean variations of the air trapping index from baseline to treatment completion were 34.3 (11.2, 57.3) and 27.3 (6.4, 48.2) for the HFA-BDP and FP groups, respectively. However, the reduction of air trapping area was more pronounced in the group treated with HFA-BDP. CONCLUSION: Inhaled corticosteroids decrease air trapping in uncontrolled asthma regardless of their particle size. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In mild-to-moderate asthma, air trapping assessed by HRCT may be a new outcome related to the control of the disease.     

Sodium cromoglycate as a replacement for inhaled corticosteroids in mild-to-moderate childhood asthma

We investigated whether sodium cromoglycate 10 mg three times daily, delivered as an aerosol via Nebuhaler (in addition to terbutaline 0.5 mg three times daily), could replace inhaled steroid in children with mild-to-moderate asthma. Children (mean age 10.3 years) were randomly allocated to 12-week treatment with sodium cromoglycate 10 mg plus terbutaline 0.5 mg (group A; n =30) or placebo plus terbutaline 0.5 mg (group B; n =32), both taken three times a day. The daily steroid dose was reduced by 50 μg/ week for 4 weeks from a starting dose of 200 μg. Fewer patients withdrew owing to worsening asthma from group A ( n =1) than group B ( n =11). Symptom scores, morning and evening peak flows, and additional β₂-agonist usage, recorded on diary cards, were better in group A than group B. Lung function measured at clinic visits was unchanged in either group. Overall opinions of efficacy favoured Group A. Adverse events were similar in the groups. Sodium cromoglycate plus terbutaline substituted effectively for inhaled steroid therapy.     

Safety of inhaled corticosteroids in the treatment of persistent asthma

OBJECTIVE: Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are the most effective medications available for patients with persistent asthma of all severities and currently are recommended as the preferred asthma controller therapy by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute. Nevertheless, lingering concerns about potential adverse systemic effects of ICSs contribute to their underuse. This review discusses the safety of ICSs with respect to potential systemic effects of most concern to physicians and patients. METHODS: Articles reporting on the safety of ICSs in children and adults with persistent asthma were identified from the Medline database from January 1966 through December 2003, reference lists of review articles and international respiratory meetings. RESULTS: Ocular effects of ICSs and ICS effects on bone mineral density and adrenal function are minimal in patients maintained on recommended ICS doses. One-year growth studies in children have shown decreased growth velocity with ICSs, but long-term studies with inhaled budesonide and beclomethasone show no effect on final adult height, suggesting that these effects are transient. In addition, extensive data from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry show no increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes when inhaled budesonide is administered to pregnant women with asthma. CONCLUSIONS: ICSs have minimal systemic effects in most patients when taken at recommended doses. The benefits of ICS therapy clearly outweigh the risks of uncontrolled asthma, and ICSs should be prescribed routinely as first-line therapy for children and adults with persistent disease.