Randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus estramustine and single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere)-based regimens are the new standard therapy in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A synergistic activity has been shown with docetaxel in combination with estramustine in vitro; however, the benefit of this combination remains controversial in clinical practice. We assessed the activity and safety of docetaxel alone and docetaxel-estramustine in HRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 92) with metastatic HRPC and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) while receiving androgen suppression were randomized to 3-weekly treatment with either docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1 (D), or docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), day 2, plus oral estramustine 280 mg twice daily, days 1-5 (DE). RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were treated (DE 47, D 44). A PSA response occurred in 68% (primary endpoint met) and 30% of patients, respectively. Median PSA response duration was 6.0 months in both groups. Median time to progression was 5.7 and 2.9 months, and median survival was 19.3 and 17.8 months in the DE and D arms, respectively. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxic effects were mild and similar in both arms. One patient in each group withdrew due to toxicity. Quality of life was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Combining estramustine with docetaxel in this schedule is an active and well-tolerated treatment option in HRPC.     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in symptomatic androgen-independent prostate cancer

Background:This study sought to dene the activity and toxicityof weekly docetaxel in patients with androgen-independentprostate cancer and cancer-related pain. Patients and methods:Patients and methods: Twenty-ve patients were treatedwith docetaxel 36 mg/m 2 i.v. administered weekly for sixconsecutive weeks followed by two weeks without treatment.This eight-week treatment cycle was repeated until progressionor unacceptable toxicity. Endpoints included palliative re-sponse (a 2-point reduction on the 6-point Present Pain Inten-sity scale without an increase in analgesic consumption or a50% decrease in analgesic use without an increase in pain),PSA response (a 50% decrease maintained at least four weeks),measurable disease response, survival, and toxicity. Results:Twelve of 25 patients (48%, 95% condence inter-val (95% CI): 28%-68%) had a palliative response. Eleven ofthe 24 patients who entered with an elevated PSA (46%, 95%CI: 25%-67%) had a PSA response. Two of ve patients withmeasurable disease had a partial response. Toxicity of therapywas modest with no treatment-related mortality. Twenty-vepercent of patients experienced a grade 3 or 4 hematologictoxicity and 36% of patients experienced a grade 3 non-hema-tologic toxicity. Conclusions:Weekly docetaxel is well tolerated in patientswith androgen-independent prostate cancer and has signi-cant activity as measured by relief of pain, reduction in PSA,and reduction in measurable disease.     

A phase II study of vinorelbine and estramustine in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer

Introduction

This phase II study was designed to evaluate the efficacy of vinorelbine in combination with estramustine in patients with chemotherapy-naïve hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

Material and methods

Patients received vinorelbine (i.v. 25 mg/m²) on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks and estramustine (oral, 600 mg/m²) daily. Eligible patients were required to have progressive metastatic disease following the first hormonal manipulation.

Results

Of the 51 patients enrolled (median age=69 years), 84% presented bone involvement and 75% had at least two organs involved at the time of study entry and 47 were evaluable for treatment efficacy. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) response (≥50% decrease) which was the primary efficacy criterion was reported in 21 patients (41.2%) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and in 20 patients (48.8%) in the perprotocol (PP) population. Of the 7 patients with measurable disease, 2 achieved partial response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.7 months (range: 1.9–8.6) and 14.3 months (range: 4.2–21.2), respectively. grade 3–4 neutropenia was reported in 6.1% of patients and in 1% of cycles. The incidence of complicated neutropenia (febrile neutropenia reported in 1 patient and septic shock with severe neutropenia reported in 2 patients) was 5.8%. The most frequent grade 3–4 non-haematological events (% of patients ≥5%) included anorexia (10%), thrombosis/embolism (8%), vomiting and hypotension (6% each). There were 3 toxic deaths (5.9%) resulting from pulmonary embolism, angina pectoris, and septic shock. The impact of combined chemotherapy on the quality-of-life (QL) of the patients was assessed between baseline and the first evaluation scheduled at 6 weeks indicated a marked reduction in pain while the rest of the symptoms remained stable. Overall, health status improved slightly over the treatment period.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that the combination of vinorelbine and estramustine is an active regimen in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer who had not been treated previously with chemotherapy. Main toxicities included complicated neutropenia even though the incidence of severe neutropenia was low. We observed a higher incidence of toxic deaths which could have been related to the regimen of estramustine used in the study.     

Combined anti-microtubule therapy: a phase II study of weekly docetaxel plus estramustine in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and estramustine exert anti-tumor effects by inhibiting microtubule function. In vitro data suggest synergism with this combination. This phase II study evaluated the response rate and toxicity of docetaxel and estramustine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) on day 2 and estramustine phosphate 280 mg p.o. tds days 1-3 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks, for a maximum of six treatment cycles. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were enrolled between August 1999 and March 2001; 36 were eligible. Of 31 evaluable patients, responses were observed in 15 patients (47%); two patients (6%) obtained a complete response. Median time to treatment failure was 6 months; median survival was 1 year. Thromboembolic toxicity occurred in 11% of patients: three experienced deep venous thromboses and one had a fatal pulmonary embolism. Myelosuppression was minimal with this regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Despite modest activity in metastatic breast cancer, the toxicity observed with the combination of estramustine and docetaxel precludes the routine use of this combination in the treatment of breast cancer. Further studies using this compound in metastatic breast cancer are not warranted.     

Sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine in patients with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer: results of a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Mitoxantrone/prednisone ameliorates symptoms in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) but has no effect on survival. Docetaxel (Taxotere)/estramustine improves response but with significant toxicity. We reasoned that a sequential administration of the two regimens could be a viable alternative for delivering full doses of chemotherapy, avoiding overlapping toxicity and preserving dose intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty HRPC patients were treated with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2), day 1, every 3 weeks, plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, for three cycles, followed by estramustine phosphate, 280 mg three times daily, days 1 to 5, plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 2, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 10 cycles. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. After mitoxantrone/prednisone treatment, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate was 23%, which increased to 63% after completion of sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone and docetaxel/estramustine treatment (12 partial and 7 complete responses). With a median follow-up of 18 months, median survival for all patients was 18 months, and median progression-free survival was 10 months. The mitoxantrone/prednisone regimen was well tolerated, and the only grade 3-4 toxicity was grade 3 neutropenia in four (13%) patients. Twenty-nine patients received a total of 173 cycles of docetaxel/estramustine (median, 6 cycles/patient). Six (20%) patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia and two (6%) patients had febrile neutropenia episodes. The most frequent non-hematological toxic effects were asthenia, nausea and vomiting, edemas and onycholysis. Two (6%) patients had deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine is a well-tolerated and active regimen in HRPC. Sequential therapy is feasible and can be used to integrate novel, more active regimens.     

Weekly administration of docetaxel in combination with estramustine and celecoxib in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer: final results from a phase II study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of weekly docetaxel, estramustine and celecoxib in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Forty-eight patients received 35 mg m(-2) of weekly docetaxel for 3 out of every 4 weeks, 280 mg of estramustine twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 and 400 mg of celecoxib twice daily until progression or toxicity. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for at least six cycles. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity. Patients received a median of four cycles (range: 1-9). On an intention-to-treat analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was decreased greater than 50% in 28 out of 48 patients (overall response rate: 58%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 44-72) and median duration of PSA response was 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.9-9.0). After a median follow-up of 11.3 months, the median time to progression was 7.1 months and the median overall survival was 19.2 months. The most frequent severe toxicity was asthenia (15% of patients), diarrhoea and stomatitis (8% of patients, each). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in two patients. There was a toxic death during the study due to a gastric perforation. Celecoxib with weekly docetaxel and estramustine is an effective and safe treatment for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, but it does not seem to add any benefit to docetaxel.     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Purpose To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the combination of cisplatin on day 1 and docetaxel on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for the treatment of previously untreated patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methods A group of 38 patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who had not received prior treatment and who were aged under 75 years were enrolled. The patients received intravenous infusions of docetaxel (25 mg/m², days 1, 8, 15) and cisplatin (80 mg/m², day 1), followed by a week of rest.Results Six patients had grade 3/4 neutropenia (18%), but there were no episodes of neutropenic fever. Nonhematologic toxicities were also mild. There were 12 partial responses for an objective response rate of 31.6%. The median survival was 11.8 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 46.5%.Conclusion Cisplatin combined with weekly administration of docetaxel is efficacious against NSCLC with low hematotoxicity, and this schedule may be an alternative for the treatment of NSCLC.     

A phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with anthracycline pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Background: Docetaxel has significant activity in metastatic breast cancer and weekly schedules are associated with less myelosuppression than 3-weekly schedules. We evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly docetaxel in anthracycline-pretreated patients. Patients and methods: A total of 42 patients were studied. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 35 mg/m² weekly as a 30-min infusion for 6 weeks followed by a 2-week rest, with dexamethasone 8 mg i.v. pre-medication and 4 mg orally 12-hourly for 48 h following treatment. Results: The median age of the patients was 53 years (range 34–74). Twenty-six (62%) patients had received prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. Patients received a median 10 weeks of treatment (range 1–24). 11 had a partial response (ORR 26%; 95% CI 13–39%), five of whom had relapsed <12 months since the end of previous anthracycline-based chemotherapy. In addition six patients (14%) had stable disease for >16 weeks. Myelosuppression was rare with only 2 patients (5%) experiencing grade 3 neutropenia (no grade 4 neutropenia). Non-haematological grade III toxicities were as follows: fatigue 17%, neuropathy 0%, hyperlacrimation 5%, stomatitis 7%, diarrhoea 14%, and cutaneous toxicity 19%. Skin toxicity consisted of limb/palmar–plantar erythematous reactions, or fixed-plaque erythrodysaesthesia. Conclusions: Weekly docetaxel has moderate activity in women with anthracycline pre-treated breast cancer. Although the level of myelosuppression is lower than 3-weekly regimens, this weekly regimen cannot be recommended due to the significant non-haematological toxicities associated with the treatment.     

A phase 2 study of estramustine,docetaxel, and bevacizumab in men with castrate‐resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

The use of docetaxel prolongs survival for patients with castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with bevacizumab may further enhance the antitumor effect of docetaxel and estramustine in patients with CRPC.

METHODS:

This cooperative group trial enrolled men with CRPC. Patients received oral estramustine 280 mg 3 times daily on Days 1 through 5 of every cycle plus 70 mg/m² docetaxel and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab on Day 2 every 3 weeks. Prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) values were monitored every cycle, and imaging studies were obtained every 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS), and the secondary objectives were safety, PSA decline, measurable disease response, and overall survival.

RESULTS:

Seventy‐nine patients were enrolled; and 77 patients received a median of 8 cycles and were evaluable. A 50% PSA decline was observed in 58 patients (75%). Twenty‐three of 39 patients with measurable disease had a partial response (59%). The median PFS was 8 months, and the overall median survival was 24 months. Neutropenia without fever (69%), fatigue (25%), and thrombosis/emboli (9%) were the most common severe toxicities. Twenty‐four of 77 patients were removed from protocol treatment because of disease progression, 35 of 77 patients were removed because of a physician or patient decision, and 15 patients were removed secondary to toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combination of docetaxel, estramustine, and bevacizumab was tolerable but complicated by toxicity. Although the endpoint of PFS did not meet the desired level, encouraging antitumor activity and overall survival were observed. Further phase 3 evaluation of the role of bevacizumab in CRPC is ongoing. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

多西紫杉醇治疗激素非依赖性前列腺癌临床研究新进展

预后较差的激素非依赖性的前列腺癌,目前的治疗方法主要是化疗.米托蒽醌和雌莫司汀都是已经FDA批准的可以用于治疗前列腺癌的化疗药物.两种药物与单用激素相比,未延长患者的生存时间.2004年全美临床肿瘤年会(ASCO)上,报告了两项多西紫杉醇联合化疗治疗激素难治性前列腺癌的临床研究,结果显示能明显改善生存.     

Intermittent docetaxel therapy with estramustine for hormone-refractory prostate cancer in Japanese patients

Background  We evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of intermittent docetaxel (DCT) with estramustine (EM) for hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Methods  Fifteen patients were enrolled. They received injected DCT (70 mg/m² body surface) on day 1 in association with oral EM 560 mg/day (days 1–5). Treatments were repeated every 3 weeks. Serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were categorized based on the first three courses. Patients exhibiting either a response or stable disease (SD) could have a holiday from treatment (intermittent schedule). The holiday continued until elevation of the PSA level from the nadir baseline level occurred three times. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Survival curves were established using Kaplan-Meier graphs. Results  The median number of courses of DCT/EM therapy was five (range, 3–12 courses). The response rate of the first cycle was 53%: 3 patients with complete response (CR), 5 patients with partial response (PR), 4 patients with SD, and 3 patients with disease progression. Eight patients were able to begin the second re-entry cycle. No patients showed a CR, 2 patients exhibited PR, 4 patients had SD, and the overall response rate was 25%. The survival rates were 93% at 1 year, and 26.1% at 2 years Grade 3–4 anemia was observed in 2 patients (13.3%), neutropenia in 11 (73.3%), and thrombocytopenia in 2 (13.3%). The QOL scale showed good QOL after 6 months, with improvement in the score for nausea and vomiting. Conclusion  Intermittent DCT/EM therapy was well tolerated, and has the potential to prolong survival, with a high QOL, in patients with HRPC.     

Phase II study of weekly docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of weekly docetaxel administration in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven women were treated with 1 h infusions of docetaxel at 40 mg/m2/week after pre-medication with 8 mg dexamethazone. Each cycle consisted of three consecutive weekly treatments followed by a 1 week rest. All patients were assessed for toxicity; five patients were not assessable for clinical response, time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) because of early treatment failure, but they were included in intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: Patients received a median of four cycles (range, 1-9), with a median dose intensity of 28 mg/m2/week (range 22-30) and a median relative dose intensity of 0.95 (range 0.73-1.0). No patients showed complete response, whereas 14 had partial response, which accounted for 38% of objective response rate [95% confidence interval (CI) 22% to 53%]. In addition, three patients (8%, 95% CI 0% to 17%) had stable disease over 6 months. Clinical responses were achieved at a median of three cycles (range 1-4 cycles). The median TTP and OS were 5 and 12 months, respectively. The weekly docetaxel regimen was generally well tolerated. About half of the patients experienced grade > or = 1 neutropenia; only 19% had grade 3/4 neutropenia, including one case of grade 4. No febrile neutropenia was observed and fluid retention syndrome was uncommon. Non-hematologic toxicity, however, such as asthenia/fatigue, nail damage, tearing or hearing disorders, was seen with successive treatment cycles. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel at 40 mg/m2/week is an active and feasible regimen for patients with metastatic breast cancer.     

Weekly docetaxel for patients with platinum/paclitaxel/irinotecan-resistant relapsed ovarian cancer: a phase I study

Background This study was designed to investigate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dose (RD) of weekly docetaxel treatment in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after the administration of platinum/paclitaxel/irinotecan.Methods Patients were enrolled on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Docetaxel was administered intravenously over a 60-min period on days 1, 8, and 15. Four dosage levels, 30, 35, 40, and 45mg/m², were employed, and the dosage was escalated from level 1 to level 4. DLT criteria were established, and the DLT was used as the criterion for deciding the MTD and RD.Results Twelve patients were enrolled. No grade 3/4 hematological toxicities were manifested at any dosage level. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were manifested at level 4, consisting of fatigue/asthenia in 2 patients and neuropathy/sensory toxicity in 1 patient. Level 4 (45mg/m²) was thus judged to be the MTD, and the RD was concluded to be one level lower, i.e., level 3 (40mg/m²).Conclusions It was concluded that the RD for weekly docetaxel therapy is 40mg/m² per week in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer after the administration of platinum/paclitaxel/irinotecan.     

Docetaxel and epirubicin compared with docetaxel and prednisone in advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised phase II study

Background:

This randomised phase II study compared the activity and safety of the combination docetaxel (D)/epirubicin (EPI) with the conventional treatment D/prednisone (P) in advanced castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients.

Materials and methods:

Patients were randomly assigned to D 30 mg m⁻² as intravenous infusion (i.v.) and EPI 30 mg m⁻² i.v. every week (D/EPI arm), or D 70 mg m⁻² i.v. every 3 weeks and oral P 5 mg twice daily (D/P arm). Chemotherapy was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Results:

A total of 72 patients were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to treatment: 37 to D/EPI and 35 to D/P. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.1 months (95% CI 9.2–12.6 months) in the D/EPI arm and 7.7 months (95% CI 5.7–9.4 months) in the D/P arm (P=0.0002). The median survival was 27.3 months (95% CI 22.1–30.8 months) in the D/EPI arm and 19.8 months (95% CI 14.4–24.8 months) in the D/P arm (P=0.003). Both regimens were generally well tolerated.

Conclusion:

The treatment of advanced CRPC with weekly D combined with weekly EPI was feasible and tolerable, and led to superior PFS than the treatment with 3-weekly D and oral P.     

A phase II trial of CI-958 in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Purpose: To assess the antitumor activity of the benzothiopyranoindazole CI-958 {5-[(2-aminomethyl)amino]-2-[2-(diethylamino)ethyl]-2H-[l]benzothi- opyrano[4,3,2-cd]-indazol-8-ol trihydrochloride} in hormone-resistant prostate carcinoma, using an intravenous dose of 700 mg/m² every 3 weeks. Patients and methods: Patients eligible for this study had advanced prostate carcinoma that had failed hormonal treatment. Changes in an initially elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and regression of objectively measurable disease were used as response criteria. Results: All 33 patients enrolled were evaluated. Of 30 with elevated PSA levels, 6 had a >50% decline maintained for >30 days; response durations ranged from 105 to 623 days. Eleven patients had objectively measurable disease; two had partial responses (lasting 316 and 461 days) consisting of shrinkage of retroperitoneal nodes and of masses surrounding the rectum and bladder. The survival of all responding patients ranged from 366 days to 709 days and the median survival of all patients was 12 months (range 1–23 + months). Neutropenia was common, but thrombocytopenia was not. Nonhematologic side effects included nausea, vomiting, anorexia, asthenia, and chills, but were usually mild. The drug caused phlebitis when given into peripheral veins and central venous administration is recommended. No consistent reductions in cardiac function were documented by sequential assessment of left ventricular ejection fractions. Conclusions: CI-958 has modest but definite antitumor activity in hormone-resistant prostate carcinoma. Its toxicities include neutropenia, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, asthenia, chills and phlebitis. Received: 22 January 1999 / Accepted: 8 April 1999     

A phase II study of weekly docetaxel as salvage chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

Background:Docetaxel has shown some activity in advanced gastriccancer. Recent phase I studies found low hematologic toxicity and a favourabletoxicity profile when docetaxel was administered on a weekly schedule. In thisstudy, we explored the activity of weekly docetaxel in patients with advancedgastric cancer who failed first-line chemotherapy. Materials and methods:Patients with stable or progressing diseaseafter first-line chemotherapy received 36 mg/m² weekly docetaxel.One cycle consisted of six administrations followed by a two-weeks rest,patients were re-evaluated at week eight. The optimal two-stage design wasadopted for early stopping of the trial if responses were one or less in 21patients (<20% response rate with and errorprobabilities 0.05 and 0.010 respectively). Results:Twenty-one patients have been enrolled and they are fullyevaluable for response and toxicity. One patient achieved partial response,8 patients had stable disease and 12 patients progressed. Median overallsurvival from the onset of salvage chemotherapy was 3.5 months. Hematologictoxicity was observed in two patients who experienced grade III leukopenia.Beginning from the third week of treatment, most of the patients (90%)showed grade II asthenia which resulted the commonest side-effect. Conclusions:This schedule of weekly docetaxel did not showsignificant activity in pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer.     

Dasatinib combined with docetaxel for castration-resistant prostate cancer: results from a phase 1-2 study

BACKGROUND:

To determine the potential efficacy of targeting both the tumor and bone microenvironment in patients with castration‐resistant prostate cancer (PC), the authors conducted a phase 1‐2 trial combining docetaxel with dasatinib, an oral SRC inhibitor.

METHODS:

In phase 1, 16 men received dasatinib 50 to 120 mg once daily and docetaxel 60 to 75 mg/m² every 21 days. In phase 2, 30 additional men received dasatinib 100 mg once daily/docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 21 days. Efficacy endpoints included changes in prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), measurable disease, bone scans, and markers of bone metabolism. Safety and pharmacokinetics were also studied.

RESULTS:

Combination dasatinib and docetaxel therapy was generally well tolerated. Thirteen of 46 patients (28%) had a grade 3‐4 toxicity. Drug‐drug interactions and a maximum tolerated dose were not identified. Durable 50% PSA declines occurred in 26 of 46 patients (57%). Of 30 patients with measurable disease, 18 (60%) had a partial response. Fourteen patients (30%) had disappearance of a lesion on bone scan. In bone marker assessments, 33 of 38 (87%) and 26 of 34 (76%) had decreases in urinary N‐telopeptide or bone‐specific alkaline phosphatase levels, respectively. Twenty‐eight patients (61%) received single‐agent dasatinib after docetaxel discontinuation and had stabilization of disease for an additional 1 to 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS:

The high objective response rate and favorable toxicity profile are promising and justify randomized studies of docetaxel and dasatinib in castration‐resistant PC. Parallel declines in levels of PSA and bone markers are consistent with cotargeting of epithelial and bone compartments of the cancer. Treatment with single‐agent dasatinib following docetaxel cessation warrants further study. Cancer 2012;. © 2011 American Cancer Society.     

Diethylstilbestrol and docetaxel: a Phase II study of tubulin active agents in patients with metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The addition of diethylstilbestrol to docetaxel modified tubulin composition and improved the response of prostate cancer to chemotherapy in preclinical models. An attempt was made to recapitulate the observations in a clinical trial. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with progressive, metastatic, chemotherapy-naive androgen-independent prostate cancer were treated with diethylstilbestrol 1 mg daily and 5 mg on the day before docetaxel and docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) intravenously weekly for 3 weeks of a 4-week cycle. Prophylactic anticoagulation was used in all patients. Patients were assessed by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) monthly and computed tomography (CT) and bone scans every 3 cycles. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria and PSA decline by >50% maintained for 4 weeks were used to assess activity. RESULTS: The median age was 68 years (range, 56-84 years), Southwest Oncology Group performance status 0 (score range, 0-2), alkaline phosphatase 120 U/L (range, 49-523), hemoglobin (Hgb) 12.6 g/dL (range, 9.2-16.3), PSA 66 ng/dL (range, 4-1962). The median number of cycles administered was 6. Soft tissue metastases were present in 51% of patients and bone metastases in 93%. Twenty-nine patients are evaluable for response. Of these, 20 patients (69%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 49%-85%) had a PSA decline of >50% and the PSA declined by >90% in 12 patients (41%, 95% CI, 23.1%-58.9%). Of 15 patients with measurable disease, 6 (40%, 95% CI, 23.5%-61%) had a partial response. Median time to progression was 6 months (range, 3-19 months). Fifteen patients (51%) suffered grade 3/4 toxicity. Two patients died of causes unrelated to therapy and another died from a steroid-induced ulcer. Six patients developed thrombosis and of those tested 75% had Factor V mutations. Pretreatment PSA, performance status, Hgb, and alkaline phosphatase had no impact on the likelihood of response. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of diethylstilbestrol and docetaxel produces a significant level of activity, measured by PSA decline and measurable disease response rate, and except for venous thrombosis the toxicity appears similar to that seen with docetaxel plus prednisone. These results suggest that tubulin modulation with diethylstilbestrol may improve the therapeutic efficacy of docetaxel and the combination is worthy of further study.     

A phase 2 study of carboplatin plus docetaxel in men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer who are refractory to docetaxel

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality among men in the U.S. To the authors' knowledge, there is no proven, effective, second-line therapy for docetaxel-refractory disease. Recent data suggest that platinum salts may be effective when combined with taxanes in metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). The authors conducted a phase 2 trial of docetaxel plus carboplatin chemotherapy in this disease setting. METHODS: Eligible men had metastatic HRPC that had progressed during or within 45 days after the completion of docetaxel-based chemotherapy. Patients were treated with intravenous docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m(2) plus carboplatin at an area under the curve of 4 once every 21 days until they had either disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. Therapy was tolerated reasonably well; Grade 3 leukopenia (graded according to the Common Toxicity Criteria grading system) was the most common adverse event (experienced by 56% of patients), but there was only 1 episode of febrile neutropenia reported. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) declines > or =50% were noted in 18% of patients, and measurable responses were observed in 14%. The median duration of PSA response was 5.7 months. The median progression-free survival was 3 months, and the median overall survival was 12.4 months. Patients were more likely to respond to the combination if they previously had responded to docetaxel. CONCLUSIONS: In men with HRPC who developed progressive disease during or shortly after treatment with docetaxel, the addition of carboplatin resulted in modest additional activity. Taxane-refractory HRPC is an area of unmet need, and the current trial has provided evidence that platinum chemotherapy may be an important therapeutic option.     

Docetaxel, low-dose estramustine, and doxifluridine in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer

Purpose Advanced prostate cancer, which is one of the most common cancers, usually progresses to hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A recent randomized trial of treatment with docetaxel demonstrated improved survival for patients with HRPC. The combination of docetaxel and estramustine phosphate (estramustine) has been reported to be effective for HRPC. Low-dose estramustine suppresses the pituitary–gonadal axis. Docetaxel plus 5-fluoro-5′-deoxyuridine (5′-dFUrd) had supra-additive cytotoxic effects on HRPC cells consistent with the molecular mechanism. Therefore, we examined the efficacy of adding 5′-dFUrd on the chemotherapy regimen, which consist docetaxel and estramustine. Methods All of the HRPC patients were treated with estramustine 140 mg orally twice 5′-dFUrd 200 mg orally four times daily on days 1–21, and docetaxel 60 mg/m² was administered on day 1. We evaluated serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and measurable responses, the progression-free and overall survival, and the impact on adverse effects and the quality of life (QOL). Results Of 34 patients with a median age of 72.3 years, 73% showed PSA responses and 70% showed measurable responses. The median progression-free survival was 18.0 and 5.8 months for PSA responders and non-responders and the overall survival was 19.4 months, respectively. There were few serious adverse effects. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 32.4% of the patients, and was easily managed with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) injection. There was no significant change in the overall QOL scores serially. Conclusions This study shows that the combined regimen is tolerable and effective in Japanese HRPC patients.