Helicobacter pylori eradication: proton pump inhibitor vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate plus two antibiotics for 1 week-a meta-analysis of efficacy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor vs. ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) with two antibiotics for 1 week in Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: Randomized trials comparing 1-week regimens with (i) proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics [clarithromycin (C) and amoxycillin (A) or a nitroimidazole (N)]; or (ii) RBC plus the same antibiotics. Eradication was confirmed by histology or 13C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. Data sources included PubMed database and abstracts from congresses until October 1999. Statistical analysis was by meta-analysis combining the odds ratios (OR) of the individual studies in a global OR (Peto method). RESULTS: Twelve studies met the selection criteria. Nine compared proton pump inhibitor vs. RBC plus C and A, and five compared proton pump inhibitor vs. RBC plus C and N. With RBC, C and A, mean H. pylori eradication efficacy by intention-to-treat analysis (pooled data) was 76.6% (95% CI: 72-81%) and 73.7% (95% CI: 69-78%) with proton pump inhibitor, C and A. The OR for the effect of RBC vs. proton pump inhibitor (plus C and A) on H. pylori eradication was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.8-1.64%). Mean H. pylori eradication with RBC, C and N was 87. 2% (95% CI: 83-91%), and 74.9% (95% CI: 74-84%) with proton pump inhibitor plus these two antibiotics. The OR for the effect of RBC vs. proton pump inhibitor (plus C and N) on H. pylori eradication was 1.76 (95% CI: 1.08-2.85%). CONCLUSION: RBC and proton pump inhibitor have similar efficacy for H. pylori eradication when given with C and A for 1 week, but RBC seems to have a higher efficacy than proton pump inhibitor when C and N are the co-prescribed antibiotics.     

Meta-analysis: proton pump inhibitor or H2-receptor antagonist for Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIM: To compare H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors as adjuvants to triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: H. pylori-infected patients with peptic ulcer were randomized to receive either 300 mg nizatidine or 30 mg lansoprazole plus 1 g amoxicillin and 500 mg clarithromycin taken b.d. for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was assessed 4 weeks after therapy. Using meta-analytical techniques, we combined the results of this study with other randomized controlled comparisons of H2-receptor antagonists and proton pump inhibitors as adjuvants to triple therapy. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were randomized. H. pylori eradication was 94% (47/50) [95% confidence interval (CI), 83-99%] (intention-to-treat) in the H2-receptor antagonist group vs. 86% (44/51) (95% CI, 74-94%) in the proton pump inhibitor group (P = 0.3). There has been a total of 12 similar studies (1415 patients). The overall efficacy was similar in intention-to-treat analysis: 78% (549/701) with H2-receptor antagonists vs. 81% (575/714) with proton pump inhibitors (odds ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.66-1.12). A non-significant trend favouring H2-receptor antagonist (79% vs. 69%; odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.76-1.71; P = 0.5) was seen in the comparison of clarithromycin-containing regimens. In contrast, in non-clarithromycin-containing trials, there was a slight, but significant, advantage with proton pump inhibitors (85% vs. 78%; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45-0.92; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Overall, proton pump inhibitor and H2-receptor antagonist antisecretory agents appear to be similarly effective as adjuvants for H. pylori triple therapy. It is unlikely that the direct anti-H. pylori effect of proton pump inhibitors is responsible for their ability to enhance anti-H. pylori therapy.     

Treatment options for Helicobacter pylori infection when proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy fails in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens has not been extensively investigated in the clinical practice setting. The optimal treatment choice after an initial failed eradication attempt has not been determined. AIMS: To evaluate proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies as first-line eradication regimens in clinical practice, and to establish the efficacy of second-line regimens in the context of an initial failed eradication attempt. METHODS: Three hundred and eight patients with dyspepsia and evidence of H. pylori at endoscopy were recruited. As first-line therapy, 116 patients received omeprazole 20 mg b.d. in combination with amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (OAC) while 192 patients received omeprazole 20 mg b.d. in combination with metronidazole 400 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (OMC). H. pylori status was reassessed at least 4 weeks after therapy (25 patients failed to attend for further testing). Of 52 patients with an initial failed eradication attempt, 20 patients received a 1 week quadruple therapy regimen incorporating omeprazole 20 mg b.d., tripotassium dicitrato bismuthate 120 mg q.d.s., tetracycline 500 mg q.d.s. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s., 20 patients received a 2-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen as described, and 12 patients received a further 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen. RESULTS: Including 308 patients, the intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates for OAC and OMC as first-line regimens were 72% (95% CI: 63-80%) and 73% (95% CI: 67-79%) respectively. A per protocol (PP) analysis on the 283 patients who completed follow-up gives an initial eradication rate of 78% (95% CI: 69-86%) for OAC and 79% (95% CI: 73-85%) for OMC. There were 60 patients (21%; 95% CI: 17-26%) in whom the initial eradication attempt was unsuccessful. With second-line therapy, H. pylori was successfully eradicated in a further 35/52 (67%; 95% CI: 58-73%) patients. The eradication rates with the quadruple regimen and 2-week triple therapy regimens were 75% (95% CI: 56-94%) and 80% (95% CI: 63-98%) respectively (P = 0. 71). The eradication rate with a repeat 1-week regimen was 33% (95% CI: 7-60%). CONCLUSIONS: The eradication rates achieved in this 'in practice' study with recommended first-line 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimens were lower than the rates achieved with similar regimens in the clinical trial setting. A repeat 1-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen was not successful as a salvage therapy. Both the 2-week proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy regimen and the 1-week quadruple therapy regimen were successful second-line treatments in >/=75% of patients.     

中国人群中CYP2C19基因多态性对质子泵抑制剂三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效影响的Meta分析

目的：系统评价中国人群中药物代谢酶CYP2C19基因多态性与质子泵抑制剂三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌疗效的关系,为临床治疗提供循证参考。方法：检索PubMed、Embase、CBM、CNKI、WanFang data、CQVIP等数据库,收集CYP2C19基因多态性与质子泵抑制剂三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌感染的临床文献。根据纳入和排除标准筛选文献、评价和提取数据后,采用RevMan 5.3和Stata 13.1软件进行Meta分析。结果：共纳入12篇文献,包含1 851例对象。Meta分析结果显示：不考虑质子泵抑制剂类型,CYP2C19强代谢型（EM）、中间代谢型（IM）与弱代谢型（PM）的幽门螺杆菌根治率存在统计学差异[EM vs. IM：OR=0.57,95%CI（0.36,0.88）,P<0.05;EM vs. PM：OR=0.39,95%CI（0.25,0.59）,P<0.05;IM vs. PM：OR=0.54,95%CI（0.35,0.86）,P<0.05]。亚组分析表明含奥美拉唑的三联方案中,EM型幽门螺杆菌根治率明显低于IM型[OR=0.21,95%CI（0.11,0.39）,P<0.05],同样结果也发生在EM与PM之间[OR=0.12,95%CI（0.04,0.35）,P<0.05],但IM型与PM型间无差异。其他质子泵抑制剂如埃索美拉唑、兰索拉唑、雷贝拉唑等未发现上述差异。结论：中国人群中CYP2C19基因多态性可能影响奥美拉唑三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效,但不影响埃索美拉唑、兰索拉唑、雷贝拉唑等质子泵抑制剂的根除效果。     

Effect of treatment of Helicobacter pylori on the prevention of gastroduodenal ulcers in patients receiving long-term NSAIDs: a double-blind,placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: There is controversy as to whether Helicobacter pylori and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs interact to cause peptic ulcers. AIM: To study whether the eradication of H. pylori in patients on long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy prevents the development of ulcers. METHODS: Patients infected with H. pylori whilst receiving long-term non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy, but with no ulcers at baseline endoscopy, were randomized to receive either triple antibiotic therapy (metronidazole 300 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and amoxicillin 500 mg, given four times daily; n = 70) or placebo (n = 70) for 2 weeks. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were continued throughout the study period. Endoscopy was repeated 12 weeks after the end of treatment. The development of ulcers was compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Endoscopy at 12 weeks revealed peptic ulcer development in five [7%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2-16] of the patients who received triple therapy and in six (9%; 95% CI, 3-18) of those who received placebo (P = 1.00). No significant difference in the development of ulcers was found between patients with persistent H. pylori infection (7/80; 9%; 95% CI, 4-17) and those with the eradication of H. pylori (4/52; 8%; 95% CI, 2-19) (P = 1.00). CONCLUSIONS: The eradication of H. pylori in patients receiving long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs did not prevent ulcer development. However, because the rate of ulcer development was low, a study with a larger sample size is required to confirm this finding.     

Is eradication sufficient to heal gastric ulcers in patients infected with Helicobacter pylori? A randomized,controlled, prospective study

BACKGROUND: In Helicobacter pylori infection, the effect of short-term triple therapy with proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics on gastric ulcer healing is not well known. AIM: To compare 1-week triple therapy with 8-week proton pump inhibitor therapy on gastric ulcer healing in infected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We randomly assigned 120 patients with H. pylori and gastric ulcers to proton pump inhibitor plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 1 week (n = 61) or proton pump inhibitor alone for 8 weeks (n = 59), with endoscopic assessment of ulcer healing 8 weeks after the start of treatment. RESULTS: Triple therapy eradicated H. pylori in 51 patients [intention-to-treat, 84%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 75-93%]. At 8 weeks, gastric ulcers were healed in 30 patients given triple therapy (49%; 95% CI, 37-62%) and in 49 patients given proton pump inhibitor (83%; 95% CI, 73-93%, P < 0.001). Healing rates in the triple therapy and proton pump inhibitor-only groups were 89% and 100%, respectively, for ulcers of < 1.0 cm in diameter, 54% and 77% for ulcers of 1.0 to < 1.5 cm in diameter, and 5% and 77% (P < 0.001) for ulcers of > or = 1.5 cm in diameter. CONCLUSIONS: One-week triple therapy healed most ulcers of < 1.0 cm, but not ulcers of > or = 1.5 cm. Short-term therapy is effective for gastric ulcers of < 1.0 cm, but, for larger ulcers, follow-up therapy to suppress acid is needed.     

Meta-analysis: the influence of pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor on Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: There is much debate about the influence of pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor on Helicobacter pylori eradication. The few studies investigating the influence of pre-treatment on triple and quadruple therapies did not find differences in eradication rates. However, the high eradication rates make it difficult to study factors associated with therapy failure in small populations. In order to overcome this problem we performed a meta-analysis. METHODS: The literature was searched in order to identify randomized clinical trials comparing modern triple/quadruple therapies for H. pylori eradication without pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor with exactly the same regimen with pre-treatment. The overall risk difference (with - without pre-treatment) was calculated by pooling the risk differences of the individual studies weighted by the inverse of their variances. RESULTS: Nine studies, investigating a total of 773 patients, were identified. There was considerable variation regarding therapy regimen and duration. Pooled eradication rates were 81.3% (312 of 384) for patients with pre-treatment and 81.2% (316 of 389) for patients without pre-treatment. The (weighted) overall risk difference was 0.1% (95% CI: -5%; 5%). CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment with a proton pump inhibitor does not influence H. pylori eradication.     

The importance of the level of metronidazole resistance for the success of Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIMS: To evaluate the role of antibiotic susceptibility for the treatment outcome of proton pump inhibitor-dependent and independent Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled clinical study of peptic ulcer patients with H. pylori infection, patients were randomized to receive lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole twice-daily, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily with lansoprazole or with placebo. Helicobacter pylori status was assessed by culture and antibiotic susceptibility by E-test minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in 205 clinical isolates. RESULTS: Primary resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole was 1 and 76%, respectively. In metronidazole susceptible strains eradication rates were similar at > 90% for all treatment groups (P = 0.49). With low-level metronidazole resistance (4 microg/mL < MIC < 256 microg/mL), eradication rates were similar at >75% (P = 0.80). The major difference was found at high-level metronidazole resistance (MIC >or= 256 microg/mL) with 95%, 58% and 21% eradication in the lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole twice-daily, lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily and placebo, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily groups, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the absence of antibiotic resistance, a once-daily therapy of only clarithromycin and tinidazole can achieve a high rate of H. pylori eradication. Such a combination could offer a simpler and cheaper treatment option for developing countries. The standard, twice-daily proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy was shown to be efficient in H. pylori eradication even in the presence of high-level metronidazole resistance.     

Tackling the 'dyspeptic problem'

Dyspepsia, and the issue of Helicobacter pylori status, can present significant controversies in clinical management. Both primary physicians and gastroenterologists should be aware of options for the treatment of patients with dyspepsia. This article reviews information gathered about the eradication of H. pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD), therapy for NUD not associated with H. pylori , and whether H. pylori testing should replace routine endoscopy in uncomplicated dyspepsia. The benefits of eradicating H. pylori in NUD include superior, cost-effective resolution of symptoms, compared to placebo; reduction of ulcer and gastric cancer risk; and removal of risk of certain adverse effects should long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy become necessary. In patients with normal endoscopy and no evidence of H. pylori, proton pump inhibitor therapy is superior to placebo in controlling symptoms. This benefit is confined to patients with symptoms and/or oesophageal pH-metry indicative of GORD. Non-invasive H. pylori testing may be appropriate for younger dyspeptic patients with no alarm symptoms who are not taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In conclusion, eradication of H. pylori is advisable in patients with NUD. Proton pump inhibitor therapy is superior to placebo in NUD patients without H. pylori, especially if symptoms indicate GORD. H. pylori testing may replace endoscopy in young dyspeptics with no alarm symptoms or NSAID use.     

Review article: tackling the "dyspeptic problem"

Dyspepsia, and the issue of Helicobacter pylori status, can present significant controversies in clinical management. Both primary physicians and gastroenterologists should be aware of options for the treatment of patients with dyspepsia. This article reviews information gathered about the eradication of H. pylori in non-ulcer dyspepsia (NUD), therapy for NUD not associated with H. pylori, and whether H. pylori testing should replace routine endoscopy in uncomplicated dyspepsia. The benefits of eradicating H. pylori in NUD include superior, cost-effective resolution of symptoms, compared to placebo; reduction of ulcer and gastric cancer risk; and removal of risk of certain adverse effects should long-term proton pump inhibitor therapy become necessary. In patients with normal endoscopy and no evidence of H. pylori, proton pump inhibitor therapy is superior to placebo in controlling symptoms. This benefit is confined to patients with symptoms and/or oesophageal pH-metry indicative of GORD. Non-invasive H. pylori testing may be appropriate for younger dyspeptic patients with no alarm symptoms who are not taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In conclusion, eradication of H. pylori is advisable in patients with NUD. Proton pump inhibitor therapy is superior to placebo in NUD patients without H. pylori, especially if symptoms indicate GORD. H. pylori testing may replace endoscopy in young dyspeptics with no alarm symptoms or NSAID use.     

The importance of clarithromycin dose in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis of triple therapies with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxycillin or metronidazole

BACKGROUND: It is not clear which dose of clarithromycin (500 mg b.d. or 250 mg b.d.) is more effective for Helicobacter pylori eradication in proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies. METHODS: We undertook a meta-analysis of the effect of 7-day triple therapies consisting of a proton pump inhibitor (P), and clarithromycin (C) and amoxycillin (A) or metronidazole (M). A meta-analysis of all clinical trials performed in an adult population and published in English up to March 1998 was undertaken. Studies with doses of clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. or 250 mg b.d. only were included. RESULTS: A total of 82 studies (31 papers and 51 abstracts) involving 110 treatment arms and 6123 patients were analysed that met the predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. In the PAC combination, the pooled eradication rate in patients treated with clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. was 89.5% (95% CI: 86.9-92. 0%) by per protocol analysis and 86.6% (95% CI: 81.0-89.3%) by intention-to-treat analysis. These rates are significantly higher than those achieved with clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. (83.3% by per protocol and 78.2% by intention-to-treat analysis, both P < 0.0001). This difference was confirmed in head-to-head comparative studies. In the PMC regimen, clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. eradicated 90.8% (95% CI: 87.0-94.5%) of the infections compared to 88.5% (95% CI: 85.5-91. 5%) in patients treated with clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. by per protocol analysis (P = 0.082). The corresponding rates by intention-to-treat analysis for clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. and 250 mg b.d. was 88.3% and 86.7%, respectively (P = 0.259). CONCLUSIONS: Seven-day triple therapies with a proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxycillin or metronidazole are highly effective treatments for the eradication of H. pylori. Clarithromycin 500 mg b. d. should be used in these combinations to achieve the best first treatment results, which can minimize the subsequent development of bacterial resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole.     

Healing of lymphocytic gastritis after Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy--a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicentre trial

BACKGROUND: An association between Helicobacter pylori infection and lymphocytic gastritis has been postulated. AIM: To assess the long-term effect of H. pylori eradication therapy on lymphocytic gastritis in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. METHODS: Patients with lymphocytic gastritis were randomized to receive either 1-week triple therapy for eradication of H. pylori or omeprazole plus placebo. Endoscopy and histology was performed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months. Patients of the omeprazole/placebo group with persistent lymphocytic gastritis after 12 months received crossover open-label triple therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were randomized. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed a trend to a higher healing rate of lymphocytic gastritis 3 months after triple therapy compared with omeprazole/placebo (83.3% vs. 57.7%, 95% CI for RR: 0.8-2.8, P = 0.06). After 12 months, the healing rate of lymphocytic gastritis was significantly higher after triple therapy compared with omeprazole/placebo (intention-to-treat 95.8% vs. 53.8%, 95% CI for RR: 1.1-3.5, P = 0.01). All patients (n = 5) who received crossover triple therapy, showed healing of lymphocytic gastritis after further 12 months. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that 1-week triple therapy aiming at eradication of H. pylori leads to a complete and long-lasting resolution of lymphocytic gastritis in the majority of patients.     

Eradication of Helicobacter pylori does not decrease the long-term use of acid-suppressive medication

BACKGROUND: Many patients are not symptom-free after eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori and continue to use proton pump inhibitors or H2-receptor antagonists (H2-RAs). AIM: To ascertain whether a cohort of patients treated for H. pylori were still taking either proton pump inhibitors or H2-RAs more than 4 years after H. pylori eradication therapy. METHODS: In 1993-94, a cohort of 167 patients were given eradication therapy for their H. pylori infection. By means of questionnaires to the patient, general practitioner and pharmacist we were able to retrieve data from 151 patients. The use (at the time of questionnaire) of proton pump inhibitors or H2-RAs was noted. RESULTS: Indications for eradication therapy were peptic ulcer disease: 28 patients (19%) or functional dyspepsia: 123 patients (82%). Mean time of follow-up was 1466 +/- 21 days. In this group, 77 patients (51%) still used acid-suppressive medication (proton pump inhibitors 44% and H2-RAs 7%) at the time of the survey (mean follow-up more than 4 years after eradication). In the group treated for peptic ulcer disease (n=28), only nine patients still used proton pump inhibitors or H2-RAs. In contrast, 68 patients who were treated for functional dyspepsia (total number 123) still used proton pump inhibitors or H2-RAs (55%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Even after successful H. pylori eradication, < 50% of patients stop acid-suppressive therapy. This contributes significantly to economic cost and raises doubts about the practice of routinely eradicating H. pylori in patients with functional dyspepsia. In contrast, the majority of peptic ulcer patients are able to stop acid-suppressive medication.     

Meta-analysis: proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists--their efficacy with antibiotics in Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether proton pump inhibitors are superior to H2-receptor antagonists in Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. AIM: To perform a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of both antisecretors when co-prescribed with antibiotics. METHODS: Randomized clinical trials comparing proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists with the same antibiotics were selected. Data sources included PubMed, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and abstracts from congresses up to January 2002. A meta-analysis was performed by combining the odds ratios. RESULTS: Twenty studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the mean eradication rates with proton pump inhibitors and H2-receptor antagonists plus antibiotics were 74% [95% confidence interval (CI), 71-76%] and 69% (95% CI, 66-71%), respectively. The odds ratio for this comparison was 1.31 (95% CI, 1.09-1.58). The number needed to treat with proton pump inhibitors to achieve eradication success, compared with H2-receptor antagonists, was 25. When studies prescribing very high doses of H2-receptor antagonists (two of the outliers) were excluded, the odds ratio (for proton pump inhibitors vs. H2-receptor antagonists) increased to 1.37, the number needed to treat decreased to 20 and the heterogeneity between the studies decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, proton pump inhibitors are more effective than H2-receptor antagonists when prescribed at usual doses with antibiotics to eradicate H. pylori infection.     

Rabeprazole: an update of its use in acid-related disorders.

Rabeprazole is an inhibitor of the gastric proton pump. It causes dose-dependent inhibition of acid secretion. In 8-week studies, among patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), rabeprazole 20 mg/day or 10mg twice daily was as effective as omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in the healing of GORD. Symptom relief with rabeprazole was superior to that provided by placebo and ranitidine and similar to omeprazole. In long-term trials rabeprazole 10 mg/day was similar to omeprazole 20 mg/day in a 2-year study and superior to placebo in 1-year studies, in both the maintenance of healing and prevention of symptoms in patients with healed GORD. In nonerosive GORD, 4-week studies have shown rabeprazole to be more effective than placebo in relieving heartburn and various other gastrointestinal symptoms. Data among patients with Barrett's oesophagus suggest rabeprazole 20 mg/day may be more effective than placebo in maintaining healing of associated oesophagitis after 1 year of treatment. One-week triple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with rabeprazole plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin achieved eradication rates of > or =85%. Rabeprazole is as effective as omeprazole and lansoprazole when included as part of a triple-therapy regimen for the eradication of H. pylori. Eradication rates of >90% were achieved when rabeprazole 20 to 40 mg/day was included as part of a quadruple eradication regimen. As monotherapy for peptic ulcer healing and symptom relief, 4- to 8-week studies have shown rabeprazole 10 to 40 mg/day to be superior to placebo and ranitidine and have similar efficacy to omeprazole. Preliminary 1-year data among 16 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome suggest rabeprazole 60 to 120 mg/day can resolve and prevent the recurrence of symptoms and endoscopic lesions associated with this condition. In clinical trials of up to 2 years' duration the tolerability of rabeprazole is similar to that of placebo, ranitidine and omeprazole. Common adverse events assigned to rabeprazole have been diarrhoea, headache, rhinitis, nausea, pharyngitis and abdominal pain. Histological changes and increases in serum gastrin levels were unremarkable and typical of proton pump inhibitors. No dosage adjustment is necessary in renal and mild to moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole is a well tolerated proton pump inhibitor. It has proven efficacy in healing, symptom relief and prevention of relapse of peptic ulcers and GORD and can form part of effective H. pylori eradication regimens. It is an important alternative to H(2) antagonists and an additional treatment option to other proton pump inhibitors in the management of acid-related disorders.     

Meta-analysis: comparing the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors in short-term use

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors have a prominent role in the management of acid-related diseases. Controlling expenses on proton pump inhibitors would yield great economic benefits for Dutch health care. AIM: To investigate whether clinical differences in proton pump inhibitors exist. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library. We identified papers in English, German, French or Dutch in which two or more proton pump inhibitors were compared under the same clinical conditions in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease or Helicobacter pylori eradication. The pooled relative risks were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method. RESULTS: Two significant differences were found in the proton pump inhibitors compared. In gastro-oesophageal reflux disease, esomeprazole 40 mg was superior to omeprazole 20 mg (relative risk, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.23). In peptic ulcer disease, pantoprazole 40 mg was superior to omeprazole 20 mg (relative risk, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.13). In Helicobacter pylori eradication, no significant differences were found. CONCLUSIONS: Both significant differences found were in favour of the highest dose of proton pump inhibitor on a milligram basis. This indicates that the difference may be dose dependent and not proton pump inhibitor specific. Therefore, when prescribing proton pump inhibitors, arguments other than clinical efficacy, such as those related to pharmaco-economics, may be considered.     

Recurrent symptoms and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in patients with duodenal ulcer treated for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Eradication of Helicobacter pylori has been shown to prevent relapse of endoscopically detected duodenal ulcers. There is controversy regarding symptom improvement after therapy. Some studies have suggested that a substantial number of patients remain symptomatic after eradication therapy. Other studies suggest that gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may develop as a result of H. pylori eradication. AIM: To determine the relationship between symptoms and H. pylori eradication and to determine whether H. pylori eradication results in symptoms or endoscopic findings of GERD. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-two patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer disease and evidence of H. pylori infection by rapid urease testing and histology were studied in four randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trials of H. pylori eradication therapy. All patients underwent symptom assessment and endoscopy with biopsy before therapy and 1 and 6 months after completing therapy. The rapid urease test and histology were used to determine H. pylori status. Interviewers were blinded to H. pylori status after eradication and were unaware of the endoscopic findings (interviews were performed prior to repeat endoscopy). RESULTS: The presence of epigastric pain was significantly associated with persistent H. pylori infection 1 month after therapy (odds ratio 2.3, 95% CI: 1.02-5.2; P=0.041), as was nausea (OR 7.1, 95% CI: 0.93-55.6; P=0.029). The presence of epigastric pain was significantly associated with ulcer relapse at 6 months (OR 7.5, 95% CI: 3.6-15.7; P < 0.001) as was nausea (OR 5.1, 95% CI: 1.7-16.0; P=0.002). Heartburn was not associated with eradication of H. pylori or ulcer relapse. New onset reflux symptoms were reported by 17% (17 of 101 patients) at 6 months and were not significantly different in patients with (15%) and without (22%) persistent H. pylori infection (P=0.47). Erosive oesophagitis was present at endoscopy in one of the 17 cases that developed new heartburn. CONCLUSIONS: One month after completion of therapy, the presence of epigastric pain or nausea is associated with persistent infection and these symptoms at 6 months are suggestive of duodenal ulcer relapse. The incidence of GERD is not increased in patients who have eradication of H. pylori.     

Efficacy of quadruple therapy with pantoprazole,bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole as rescue treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To study the efficacy of a 7-day quadruple regimen combining pantoprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole as rescue treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of standard triple therapy. METHODS: A prospective study was made of 140 patients infected with H. pylori and diagnosed with peptic ulcer or non-ulcer dyspepsia in whom triple therapy with proton pump inhibitor, clarithromycin and amoxicillin had failed. The patients were treated with quadruple therapy including pantoprazole, 40 mg twice daily, colloidal bismuth subcitrate, 120 mg four times daily, tetracycline, 500 mg four times daily, and metronidazole, 500 mg three times daily, for 7 days. Two months after completion of therapy, a 13C-urea breath test was performed to confirm eradication. RESULTS: With quadruple therapy, the H. pylori eradication rates were 82% (95% confidence interval (CI), 75-88%) by 'intention-to-treat' and 85% (95% CI, 79-91%) by 'per protocol'. No major side-effects were observed. No differences in eradication success were observed in relation to underlying disease (peptic ulcer: 85% (95% CI, 76-91%) vs. non-ulcer dyspepsia: 83% (95% CI, 68-93%)) or smoking habits (smokers: 86% (95% CI, 75-93%) vs. non-smokers: 83% (95% CI, 71-91%)). CONCLUSION: Quadruple therapy with pantoprazole, bismuth, tetracycline and metronidazole for 7 days is an effective H. pylori eradication treatment for patients in whom standard triple therapy has failed.     

Single vs. double dose of a proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Triple therapies combining a double dose of proton pump inhibitor plus two antibiotics are the standard treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection. Some reports suggest that the use of half the dose of proton pump inhibitor is equally effective. AIM: To compare the efficacy of a single vs. double dose of proton pump inhibitor in triple therapy. METHODS: We conducted a MEDLINE search. The search strategy included the words (pylori) AND (triple, PPI, proton pump, omeprazole, rabeprazole, pantoprazole, lansoprazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, amoxycillin or metronidazole). Abstracts of the articles obtained and papers presented at the European Helicobacter pylori Study Group and American Gastroenterological Association congresses from 1996 to 2001 were examined. Inclusion criteria were: (i) randomized studies with at least two branches of triple therapy including a proton pump inhibitor and two standard antibiotics; (ii) branches could differ only in terms of proton pump inhibitor dosage. A meta-analysis was conducted using conventional shareware (Review Manager 4.1). RESULTS: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 2391 patients. Cure rates with double doses of proton pump inhibitor were higher in both the intention-to-treat analysis (83.9% vs. 77.7%; Peto odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.85; P < 0.01) and per protocol analysis (89% vs. 81%; Peto odds ratio, 1.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.55-2.47; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Triple therapies containing a single dose of proton pump inhibitor are less effective than those containing a standard double dose of proton pump inhibitor.     

Rabeprazole, amoxycillin and low- or high-dose clarithromycin for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole sodium is a proton pump inhibitor. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1-week triple therapy with rabeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: A total of 100 subjects with H. pylori were randomly divided into two groups of 1-week triple therapy with rabeprazole 10 mg b.d., amoxycillin 750 mg b.d. and either clarithromycin 200 mg b.d. (RAC400, n=50) or clarithromycin 400 mg b. d. (RAC800, n=50). Endoscopic examination with four biopsies (two specimens from the antrum and two from the gastric body) was performed. The status of H. pylori infection was determined using culture and histology (Giemsa stain) of the biopsy specimens. Sensitivity to clarithromycin was determined using the E-test: MIC > 8 g/mL was considered to be resistant, whereas MIC < 2 g/mL was considered to be sensitive. Cure was defined as no evidence of H. pylori infection 1 month after completion of treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics of the two groups. Eradication rates (intention-to-treat and per protocol, respectively) were: RAC400: 86% (95% CI: 76-95%) and 89% (95% CI: 80-97%); RAC800: 94% (95% CI: 87-100%) and 97% (95% CI: 94-100%). There was no significant difference between the eradication rates of either regimen. Three subjects with failed eradication in the RAC400 group were all infected with a clarithromycin-resistant strain before beginning the therapy. Haemorrhagic colitis was the only severe adverse event, which was observed in one patient in the RAC800 group. CONCLUSION: One-week triple therapy with rabeprazole, amoxycillin and low-dose clarithromycin is effective for the eradication of H. pylori infection.