Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula?

It is common practice to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the Schwartz formula (a height creatinine/ratio), although it has its limitations. Cystatin C was found to be a superior marker of GFR. No formula has been validated to estimate GFR from cystatin C in children. Children (aged 1.0–18 years, n=536) with various renal pathologies undergoing nuclear medicine GFR clearance studies (^99mTc-DTPA single-injection technique) were tested. Cystatin C was measured with a nephelometric assay. The Schwartz GFR was calculated using enzymatically determined serum creatinine in micromoles per liter using the constant 48 for adolescent males and 38 otherwise. Using multiple stepwise regression analysis on log/log-transformed data, we derived the following relationship between the cystatin C concentration and GFR: log(GFR)=1.962+[1.123*log(1/Cystatin C)]. Using the Bland and Altman analysis to test agreement between the Schwartz formula and gold standard GFR showed considerable bias, with a mean difference of +10.8% and a trend towards overestimation of the GFR by the Schwartz formula with lower GFRs. In contrast, the Bland and Altman analysis applied on the GFR estimate derived from cystatin C showed the mean difference to be negligible at +0.3% and no trend towards overestimation of the GFR with lower GFRs. In the regression analysis of the estimate and the GFR, the Schwartz estimate showed significant deviation from linearity, whereas the cystatin C estimate did not. In conclusion, the data suggest that this novel cystatin C-based GFR estimate shows significantly less bias and serves as a better estimate for GFR in children.This study was supported by a research grant from Dade Behring GmbH, Germany. There is no conflict of interest.     

Correlation between cystatin C- and renal scan-determined glomerular filtration rate in children with spina bifida

We report on the relationships between serum cystatin C level, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated from a cystatin C-based prediction equation (that of Filler and Lepage), GFR calculated by the Schwartz formula and technetium 99m-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (⁹⁹Tc-DTPA)-determined GFR in 28 children with spina bifida. All children underwent measurement of height, weight, serum cystatin C level, and serum creatinine level at the time of their renal scan. The relationship between variables was assessed by Pearson correlation. Pearson correlation for the relationship between ⁹⁹Tc-DTPA GFR and GFR calculated by the cystatin C-based equation was significant and higher than that of the relationship between ⁹⁹Tc-DTPA GFR and GFR calculated by the Schwartz equation, which was not statistically significant. The correlation for Filler GFR was 0.42 (P = 0.03) and for Schwartz GFR was 0.21 (P = 0.28). Although we use renal scan determination of GFR as the best measure, and a creatinine-based formula as the most practical measure, perhaps a formula such as that published by Filler and Lepage, which is not dependent on anthropometric data, might be a more useful (and accurate) tool for establishing GFR in children with spina bifida.     

Serum cystatin C as a reliable marker of changes in glomerular filtration rate in children with urinary tract malformations

PURPOSE: Cystatin C has been suggested as a simple method of estimating GFR more accurately than creatinine in children. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C with serum creatinine and the Schwartz formula for estimating GFR in patients with UTMs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively compared 72 patients with UTMs (20 days to 36 months old, 58 males and 14 females) with a group of 72 healthy controls (10 days to 48 months old, 53 males and 19 females). All patients underwent nuclear medicine clearance investigations with (99m)Tc DTPA. RESULTS: Serum concentration of cystatin C revealed a higher correlation with (99m)Tc DTPA (r = 0.62, p <0.001) than serum concentration of creatinine (r = 0.30, p <0.01) or Schwartz formula (r = 0.51, p <0.001). These results were more evident in patients with uropathy (19) with mild renal impairment. Agreement between methods was assessed using Bland Altman analysis. Mean differences between GFR calculated with (99m)Tc DTPA and cystatin C based GFR estimation or Schwartz formula were -2.6% +/- 46.7% and -73.4% +/- 53.6%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy in identifying decreased GFR measured as AUC was always highest for cystatin C but hardly sufficient for the 3 variables. Cystatin C performed better in the 0 to 6-month-olds (0.70 +/- 0.08 for cystatin C, 0.58 +/- 0.07 for Schwartz estimate) and patients older than 12 months (0.82 +/- 0.09 for cystatin C, 0.65 +/- 0.11 for Schwartz estimate). CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C proved to be a superior marker rate over serum creatinine in estimating glomerular filtration in children younger than 3 years with UTMs and mild renal impairment, thus, offering a more specific and practical measure for monitoring GFR.     

Performance of cystatin C-based equations in a pediatric cohort at high risk of kidney injury

Background

Limited data exist on the performance of cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations in pediatric transplant recipients and other high-risk patients. The aim of our study was therefore to evaluate the performance of current cystatin C-based equations in this population.

Methods

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 141 consecutive patients (58 % post-transplant) who received a nuclear medicine GFR (NucGFR) examination using ^99mTc- diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid at our institution. Subjects included children receiving liver, kidney or hematopoietic stem cell transplants and patients with oncologic or urologic disease. GFR estimates using published GFR estimating equations, including those based on cystatin C (Filler, Zappitelli, Larsson, Hoek, Rule and Le Bricon equations, respectively) and on both cystatin C and creatinine (Zappitelli, Bouvet and Schwartz equations, respectively), were evaluated and compared to the NucGFR measurement using Bland–Altman analysis.

Results

The mean NucGFR was 95 (interquartile range 76–111)  ml/min/1.73 m². Of the cystatin C-based equations, the Rule, Hoek, Zappitelli and Schwartz (2009 CKiD equation) formulas provided the closest agreement to the NucGFR estimate. All other formulas overestimated the GFR in our cohort.

Conclusion

Cystatin C-based GFR formulas can provide an accurate estimation of NucGFR in a pediatric population with a high proportion of transplant recipients and oncology patients.     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function.

BACKGROUND: Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, serum cystatin C was proposed as a new endogenous marker of GFR and in our study its diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of other markers of GFR. METHODS: In this study, 164 patients with CKD stages 2-3 (GFR 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m2), who had performed 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid clearance, were enrolled. In each patient, serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were determined. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault (C&G) and the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formulas. RESULTS: The mean 51CrEDTA clearance was 57 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean serum creatinine 149 micromol/l and the mean serum cystatin C 1.74 mg/l. We found significant correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum creatinine (R = -0.666), serum cystatin C (R = -0.792), reciprocal of serum creatinine (R = 0.628), reciprocal of serum cystatin C (R = 0.753) and calculated creatinine clearance from the formulas C&G (R = 0.515) and MDRD formulas (R = 0.716). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (cut-off for GFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) showed that serum cystatin C had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine (P = 0.04) and calculated creatinine clearance from the C&G formula (P < 0.0001), though only in female patients. No difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between serum cystatin C and creatinine clearance calculated from the MDRD formula. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that serum cystatin C is a reliable marker of GFR in patients with mildly to moderately impaired kidney function and has a higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine and calculated creatinine clearance from the C&G formula in female patients.     

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate from Serum Cystatin C: Significant Differences among Several Equations Results

Objectives: Several equations for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from serum cystatin C have been reported. We compared the results obtained using these equations to test the homogeneity of their results as well as their usefulness in clinical practice. Design and methods: Seven hundred and twenty-seven outpatients were studied. Of these, 439 were male and 288 were female, and their mean age was 60.8 ± 24.1 years. GFR was estimated from serum creatinine using the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD-4) equation. GFR was estimated from serum cystatin C levels using five different equations. Results: The simplest (100/cystatin C) formula rendered the highest estimated GFR and the Hoek’s equation rendered the lowest GFR, even significantly lower than the MDRD-4 equation (p < 0.001, Student’s t-test). From the simplest formula to the Hoek equation the mean difference calculated was 25.1 ± 8.7 mL/min (p < 0.001, Student’s t-test). No differences by gender were found among the results of different equations. All cystatin C-derived equations reduced the number of patients diagnosed of chronic renal failure when compared with MDRD-4 formula. No patient with normal renal function was shifted to the renal disease group. Conclusions: A higher value could be expected when GFR is estimated from cystatin C. Nevertheless, vast differences were found in the results when tested using several equations. Physicians should be aware of this problem to avoid a wrong clinical diagnosis of renal function.     

Clinical assessment of serum cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate in patients with various renal diseases

Background. Recent reports have raised questions about the validity of estimating glomerular function and changes in glomerular function from measurements of serum creatinine. To evaluate the clinical usefulness of serum creatinine levels in terms of estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), we determined serum cystatin C levels in 152 patients with various renal diseases and compared them with serum creatinine levels. Methods. Serum cystatin C levels were measured by particle-enhanced immunonephelometry. Two-h creatinine clearance (Ccr) was used as an indicator of GFR. Results. There was a significant positive correlation between serum cystatin C and creatinine levels (r = 0.941) in patients with various renal diseases. Serum cystatin C and creatinine were inversely correlated to Ccr. The overall correlation between serum cystatin C and Ccr was slightly stronger than that between serum creatinine and Ccr. In the patient group with a critical Ccr level (Ccr, 60–80 ml/min per 1.48 m²), the correlation between the reciprocal serum cystatin C levels and Ccr (r = 0.441) was significantly stronger (P < 0.01) than that between the reciprocal serum creatinine levels and Ccr (r = 0.212). A mild reduction of Ccr was detected more easily by serum cystatin C than by serum creatinine, as the clinical sensitivity and specificity of serum cystatin C were superior to that of serum creatinine. Conclusions. The cystatin C assay by particle-enhanced immunonephelometry was found to be a sensitive, fully automated, and rapid method. Serum cystatin C appears to be a promising marker of GFR in patients with impaired renal function. Its diagnostic potential was slightly superior to that of serum creatinine in adults with various renal diseases. Received: October 7, 1998 / Accepted: November 4, 1999     

Cystatin C as a marker for glomerular filtration rate in pediatric patients

Cystatin C is a non-glycated 13-kilodalton basic protein produced by all nucleated cells. The low molecular mass and the basic nature of cystatin C, in combination with its stable production rate, suggest that the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the major determinant of cystatin C concentration in the peripheral circulation. Recently published studies have shown that cystatin C correlates more strongly than creatinine with GFR measured using the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance. The aim of this study was to evaluate serum cystatin C as a marker for GFR in children. GFR was determined on medical indications using the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA technique in pediatric patients (2–16 years) in our renal unit. Simultaneously their cystatin C and creatinine concentrations were also measured. Of our 52 patients, 19 had a reduced renal function (<GFR 89 ml/min per 1.73 m²) based on the ⁵¹Cr-EDTA clearance. The correlation of cystatin C with the isotopic measurement of GFR tended to be stronger (r=0.89, P=0.073) than that of creatinine (r=0.80). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was better (P=0.037) than that of creatinine in discriminating between subjects with normal renal function and those with reduced GFR. This study demonstrates that serum cystatin C has an increased diagnostic accuracy for reduced GFR when compared with serum creatinine. Hence, cystatin C seems to be an attractive alternative for the estimation of GFR in children. Received: 13 May 1998 / Revised: 22 September 1998 / Accepted: 22 October 1998     

Iothalamate versus estimated GFR in a Hispanic-dominant pediatric renal transplant population

Background

Accurate knowledge of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential to the practice of nephrology. Routine surveillance of GFR is most commonly executed using estimated GFR (eGFR) calculations, most often from serum creatinine measurements. However, cystatin C-based equations have demonstrated earlier sensitivity to decline in renal function. The literature regarding eGFR from cystatin C has few references that include transplant recipients. Additionally, for most of the published eGFR equations, patients of Hispanic ethnicity have not been enrolled in sufficient numbers.

Methods

The applicability of several eGFR equations to the pediatric kidney transplant population at our center were compared in the context of determining whether Hispanic ethnicity was associated with equation performance.

Results

Updated Schwartz, CKiD, and Zappitelli eGFR estimation equations demonstrated the highest correlations.

Conclusions

The authors recommend further prospective investigations to validate and identify factors contributing to these findings.     

Cystatin C does not detect acute changes in glomerular filtration rate in early diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND: The measurement of renal functional reserve (acute change in glomerular filtration rate [GFR] after protein load) allows the detection of sub-clinical renal dysfunction and has prognostic implications in diabetes. Our aim was to test cystatin C as an index of GFR and renal functional reserve. METHODS: GFR was measured by C(Sinistrin) at baseline and after protein load in 28 diabetic patients with serum creatinine <1.2 mg/dL. The C(Sinistrin) was compared with cystatin C, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and Cockcroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: Baseline C(Sinistrin) ranged from 67-172 mL/min. Regression analysis showed an overall low relationship between C(Sinistrin) and the indirect markers of GFR. The highest correlation with C(Sinistrin) was obtained for cystatin C clearance (R(2) = 0.58, r = 0.76, p < 0.001), the 1/serum cystatin C (R(2) = 0.58, r = 0.76, p < 0.001), and serum cystatin C (R(2) = 0.52, r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Renal functional reserve was preserved in 6 of 28 patients. There was no significant change in cystatin C in response to protein load. CONCLUSION: Wide variation in baseline GFR emphasizes the need for the early detection of renal dysfunction. Cystatin C correlated best with C(Sinistrin) at baseline, but did not detect renal functional reserve.     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease

The estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is an essential part of the evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, serum cystatin C has been proposed as a new endogenous marker of GFR. Authors compared serum creatinine, creatinine clearance calculated from Cockcroft and Gault formula and serum cystatin C against (51)CrEDTA clearance in 252 patients with CKD and GFR <90 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Analysis of correlations and diagnostic accuracy (receiver operating characteristic curves) of different GFR markers indicate that serum cystatin C is a more reliable marker of GFR in patients with CKD than serum creatinine.     

Serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin as a marker of renal function in children with chronic kidney disease

Very few biomarkers exist for monitoring chronic kidney disease (CKD). We have recently shown that serum neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) represents a novel biomarker for early identification of acute kidney injury. In this study, we hypothesized that serum NGAL may also represent a biomarker for the quantitation of CKD. Forty-five children with CKD stages 2–4 were prospectively recruited for measurement of serum NGAL, serum cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by Ioversol clearance, and estimated GFR (eGFR) by Schwartz formula. Serum NGAL significantly correlated with cystatin C (r=0.74, P<0.000). Both NGAL and cystatin C significantly correlated with measured GFR (r=0.62, P<0.000; and r=0.71, P<0.000, respectively) as well as with eGFR (r=0.66, P<0.000 and r=0.59, P<0.000, respectively). At GFR levels of ≥30 ml/min per 1.73 m², serum NGAL, cystatin C, and eGFR were all significantly correlated with measured GFR. However, in subjects with lower GFRs (<30 ml/min per 1.73 m²), serum NGAL levels correlated best with measured GFR (r=0.62), followed by cystatin C (r=0.41). We conclude that (a) both serum NGAL and cystatin C may prove useful in the quantitation of CKD, and (b) by correlation analysis, NGAL outperforms cystatin C and eGFR at lower levels of measured GFR.     

Is cystatin C useful for the detection and the estimation of low glomerular filtration rate in heart transplant patients?

Although previously studied in patients with chronic kidney disease, there is less data for the use of cystatin C and cystatin C-based formulas in heart transplant recipients. The ability of creatinine and cystatin C to detect renal failure (glomerular filtration rate [GFR] below 60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)) in heart transplant patients has been compared. The accuracy and precision of a creatinine-based formula (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD]) versus a cystatin C-based formula (Rule's formula) to estimate GFR have also been studied. GFR was measured using the (51)Cr-ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid tracer in 27 patients. There was no significant difference between GFR and the reciprocal of creatinine or cystatin C. Receiver operating characteristic curves for cystatin C and creatinine were similar. Both formulas were well correlated with the GFR. The bias of the cystatin C-based was significantly better than one of the MDRD formula, but the standard deviation appeared better for the MDRD formula (bias of +3.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) versus +12 mL/min/1.73 m(2) and SD of 8.5 versus 11.6, respectively). Plasma cystatin C has no clear advantage over serum creatinine to detect renal failure in heart transplanted patients.     

Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates from serum creatinine has not been generalizable across all populations. Cystatin C has been proposed as an alternative marker for estimating GFR. The objective of this study was to compare cystatin C with serum creatinine for estimating GFR among different clinical presentations. Cystatin C and serum creatinine levels were obtained from adult patients (n=460) during an evaluation that included a GFR measurement by iothalamate clearance. Medical records were abstracted for clinical presentation (healthy, native chronic kidney disease or transplant recipient) at the time of GFR measurement. GFR was modeled using the following variables: cystatin C (or serum creatinine), age, gender and clinical presentation. The relationship between cystatin C and GFR differed across clinical presentations. At the same cystatin C level, GFR was 19% higher in transplant recipients than in patients with native kidney disease (P<0.001). The association between cystatin C and GFR was stronger among native kidney disease patients than in healthy persons (P<0.001 for statistical interaction). Thus, a cystatin C equation was derived using only patients with native kidney disease (n=204). The correlation with GFR (r(2)=0.853) was slightly higher than a serum creatinine equation using the same sample (r(2)=0.827), the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (r(2)=0.825) or the Cockcroft-Gault equation (r(2)=0.796). Averaged estimates between cystatin C and serum creatinine equations further improved correlation (r(2)=0.891). Cystatin C should not be interpreted as purely a marker of GFR. Other factors, possibly inflammation or immunosuppression therapy, affect cystatin C levels. While recognizing this limitation, cystatin C may improve GFR estimates in chronic kidney disease patients.     

Is Serum Cystatin C an Accurate Endogenous Marker of Glomerular Filteration Rate for Detection of Early Renal Impairment in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus?

Background. Researches have recently reported that serum cystatin C is a more sensitive marker of changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than serum creatinine. We conducted this study to evaluate the significance of serum cystatin C as a more sensitive marker of GFR for early detection of renal impairment in special groups of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods. The present study included 40 patients with type 2 DM divided into four equal groups based on their urinary albumin excretion and renal function: group 1 was normoalbuminuric, group 2 was microalbuminuric, group 3 was macroalbuminuric, and group 4 was macroalbuminuric with renal dysfunction. All patients underwent a thorough history, full clinical examination, fasting, and renal function tests. Post-prandial blood glucose levels, glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), proteins, albumin in 24 hr urine, and serum cystatin C were collected. Results. Serum cystatin C and creatinine were significantly higher in macrolbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients with renal dysfunction (group 4: 2.26 ± 1.28, 4.21 ± 2.38 mg/dl, respectively; p < 0.001) than macrolbuminuric type 2 diabetic patients with normal renal function (group 3: 1.04 ± 0.24, 0.96 ± 0.20 mg/dl, respectively), the microalbuminuric group (0.87 ± 0.28, 0.71 ± 0.12 mg/dl, respectively), as well as the normoalbuminuric group (0.55 ± 0.41, 0.60 ± 0.18 mg/dl, respectively). ROC plots demonstrated that area under the curve (AUC) of cystatin C (0.74) was greater than that for creatinine clearance (cr.cl) (0.67) and serum creatinine (s‐cr) (0.74); therefore, the sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of cystatin c was better than cr. cl., and both were better than s-cr. Serum cystatin C showed significant correlation in groups 2–4 with s-cr, cr.cl, and 24 hr urine albumin, but no correlation was found in group 1. Conclusion. Serum cystatin C is a reliable and easily performed marker for GFR to detect renal impairment in patients with type 2 DM.     

Detecting reduced renal function in children: comparison of GFR-models and serum markers

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the ability of renal indicators [serum creatinine (SCr), cystatin C (SCysC)] and glomerular filtration rate (GFR)-models to discriminate normal and reduced renal function. As a single cut-off level will always lead to false classifications, we propose using two cut-off levels, dividing renal function into normal or reduced, with an intermediate ??gray zone?? of indeterminable results.

Methods

Glomerular filtration rate was measured by plasma clearance of ⁵¹Cr-EDTA (13.7?C147.4?mL/min/1.73?m²) in 119 children (age range 2.3?C14.9?years). Reduced renal function was defined as a GFR of?<82?mL/min/1.73?m². SCr, SCysC, age-normalized creatinine (SCr-ratio), and eight published GFR-models were compared for their ability to correctly classify renal function as normal or reduced. Cut-off levels were determined so as to give 99?% certainty outside the gray zone.

Results

The multivariable GFR-models by Schwartz et al. (J Am Soc Nephrol 2009; 20:629?C637) and Zappitelli et al. (Am J Kidney Dis 2006; 48:221?C230) and two models by Andersen et al. [Am J Kidney Dis 2012; 59(1):50?C57: body cell mass (BCM)-model and Weight-model] performed significantly better than all other variables (P?<?0.01), with the BCM-model performing the best (P?<?0.05). The SCr-based Schwartz formula and SCr-ratio both performed better than SCr and SCysC.

Conclusions

Among the 119 children enrolled in this study and the renal indicators tested, the BCM-model had the best diagnostic performance in terms of screening for normal or reduced renal function, and the SCr-ratio was a superior diagnostic tool to both SCr and SCysC.     

Cystatin C is a more sensitive marker than creatinine for the estimation of GFR in type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best overall index of renal function in health and disease. Inulin and 51Cr-EDTA plasma clearances are considered the gold standard methods for estimating GFR. Unfortunately, these methods require specialized technical personnel over a period of several hours and high costs. In clinical practice, serum creatinine is the most widely used index for the noninvasive assessment of GFR. Despite its specificity, serum creatinine demonstrates an inadequate sensitivity, particularly in the early stages of renal impairment. Recently, cystatin C, a low molecular mass plasma protein freely filtered through the glomerulus and almost completely reabsorbed and catabolized by tubular cells, has been proposed as a new and very sensitive serum marker of changes in GFR. This study was designed to test whether serum cystatin C can replace serum creatinine for the early assessment of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The study was performed on 52 Caucasian type 2 diabetic patients. Patients with an abnormal albumin excretion rate (AER) were carefully examined to rule out non-diabetic renal diseases by ultrasonography, urine bacteriology, microscopic urine analysis, and kidney biopsy. Serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, AER, serum lipids, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured. GFR was estimated by the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA. In addition the Cockcroft and Gault formula (Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR) was calculated. RESULTS: Cystatin C serum concentration progressively increased as GFR decreased. The overall relationship between the reciprocal cystatin C and GFR was significantly stronger (r = 0.84) than those between serum creatinine and GFR (r = 0.65) and between Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR and GFR (r = 0.70). As GFR decreased from 120 to 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, cystatin C increased more significantly that serum creatinine, giving a stronger signal in comparison to that of creatinine over the range of the measured GFR. The maximum diagnostic accuracy of serum cystatin C (90%) was significantly better than those of serum creatinine (77%) and Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR (85%) in discriminating between type 2 diabetic patients with normal GFR (>80 mL/min per 1.73 m2) and those with reduced GFR (<80 mL/min/1.73 m2). In particular, the cystatin C cut-off limit of 0.93 mg/L corresponded to a false-positive rate of 7.7% and to a false-negative rate of 1.9%; the serum creatinine cut-off limit of 87.5 micromol/L corresponded to a false-positive rate of 5.8% and to a false-negative rate of 17.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C may be considered as an alternative and more accurate serum marker than serum creatinine or the Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR in discriminating type 2 diabetic patients with reduced GFR from those with normal GFR.     

Cystatin C as a marker of early changes of renal function in Fabry nephropathy

BACKGROUND: A sensitive, feasible and reproducible marker for renal function is necessary to evaluate the clinical efficacy of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) in Fabry nephropathy. Serum creatinine has some limitations and cystatin C has been proposed, in other nephropathies, as a useful marker of renal function. The use of cystatin C as a marker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was investigated in Fabry patients receiving ERT. METHODS: Renal function was evaluated with serum creatinine, serum cystatin C and estimated GFR (through Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD], Cockcroft-Gault [C&G] and Hoek formulae) in 21 Fabry patients receiving ERT with agalsidase alfa for 3 years and in 13 Fabry patients receiving agalsidase alfa for 4 years. RESULTS: During years of ERT while serum creatinine remained stable, cystatin C values showed a significant, increasing trend right from the first year of ERT. CONCLUSIONS: In Fabry disease, cystatin C is a sensitive and reliable marker of renal function, and it should be taken into account when evaluating GFR trends during ERT.     

Comparison of glomerular function tests in children with cancer

Evaluation of renal function should be performed as part of the follow-up during and after chemotherapy in pediatric cancer patients. The aim of this study was to compare an isotope clearance method [isotope glomerular filtration rate (iGFR)] with alternative methods to determine GFR in such patients. Isotope GFR [^99mTc-labeled diethylene triaminopentoacetic acid (DTPA) or ⁵¹Cr-labeled ethylenediaminetetra-acetate (EDTA)] was measured in 36 children (112 studies) and compared with simultaneously measured creatinine clearance (CrCl), serum creatinine (SCr), and cystatin C (CysC) concentrations, as well as the results of Schwartz, Counahan–Barratt, and Cockroft–Gault formulae, using general linear mixed models. Our results showed a significant association between iGFR and CysC concentrations (p < 0.001). No linear relationship was observed between CrCl and iGFR (p = 0.7). As expected, the results of height-based formulae (Counahan–Barratt and Schwartz) had significantly (p = 0.004) better correlation to iGFR than the results of a formula based on weight (Cockroft–Gault) (p = 0.19). Despite significant linear correlation, intraclass correlation coefficients showed poor agreement. Tests of similarity between iGFR estimates showed differences between average values of GFR. Therefore, determination of iGFR remains the method of choice in estimation of GFR in cancer patients. In our study population, assay of serum CysC was the most reliable alternative method to measure glomerular function.     

Measuring glomerular filtration rate with cystatin C and beta-trace protein in children with spina bifida

PURPOSE: We compared the diagnostic performance of cystatin C and beta-trace protein with serum creatinine and the Schwartz formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in children with spina bifida. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystatin C, beta-trace protein and serum creatinine in children who underwent routine measurement of glomerular filtration rate were obtained in a prospective study. A spina bifida group (27 measurements in 27 patients 1.4 to 20.0 years old, 15 female, 12 male) was compared with a group of controls (211 measurements in 201 patients with various other renal pathologies 1.0 to 20.2 years old, 89 female, 122 male). All patients underwent nuclear medicine clearance investigations with 99mtechnetium diethylenetetraminepentaacetic acid. Z scores were calculated for body mass index, height and weight. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and ROC plots were done to assess their diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Serum creatinine and the Schwartz formula did not correlate with glomerular filtration rate in the patients with spina bifida. Correlation coefficients for cystatin C were 0.45 and 0.84 in the spina bifida and control groups, respectively, while correlation coefficients for beta-trace protein were 0.31 and 0.75, respectively. For both groups ROC area was highest for cystatin C (up to 0.97 ROC area in control group). CONCLUSIONS: Only cystatin C served as a suitable marker to estimate glomerular filtration rate in patients with spina bifida. Cystatin C proved to be a superior marker in patients with spina bifida. In the control group the Schwartz formula was comparable to cystatin C and beta-trace protein, although cystatin C remained superior.