Heterosubtypic protective immunity against influenza A virus induced by fusion peptide of the hemagglutinin in comparison to ectodomain of M2 protein

Several types of influenza vaccines are available, but due to the highly unpredictable variability of influenza virus surface antigens (hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase) current vaccines are not sufficiently effective against broad spectrum of the influenza viruses. An innovative approach to extend the vaccine efficacy is based on the selection of conserved influenza proteins with a potential to induce inter-subtype protection against the influenza A viruses. A promising new candidate for the preparation of broadly protective vaccine may be a highly conserved N-terminal part of HA2 glycopolypeptide (HA2 gp) called fusion peptide. To study its capacity to induce a protective immune response, we immunized mice with the fusion peptide (aa 1-38 of HA2 gp). The protective ability of fusion peptide was compared with the ectodomain aa 2-23 of M2 protein (eM2) that is antigenically conserved and its immunogenic properties have already been well documented. Corresponding peptides (both derived from A/Mississippi/1/85 (H3N2) virus) were synthesized and conjugated to the keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) and used for the immunization of mice. Both antigens induced a significant level of specific antibodies. Immunized mice were challenged with the lethal dose of homologous (H3N2) or heterologous A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) influenza A viruses. Immunization with the fusion peptide led to the 100% survival of mice infected with 1 LD50 of homologous as well as heterologous virus. Survival rate decreased when infectious dose was raised to 2 LD50. The immunization with eM2 induced effective cross-protection of mice infected even with 3 LD50 of both challenge viruses. The lower, but still effective protection induced by the fusion peptide of HA2 gp suggested that besides ectodomain of M2, fusion peptide could also be considered as a part of cross-protective influenza vaccine. To our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating that active immunization with the conjugated fusion peptide of HA2 gp provided the effective production of antibodies, what contributed to the cross-protection against influenza infection.     

Virus-like particle vaccine containing hemagglutinin confers protection against 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza

Immunization of the world population before an influenza pandemic such as the 2009 H1N1 virus spreads globally is not possible with current vaccine production platforms. New influenza vaccine technologies, such as virus-like-particles (VLPs), offer a promising alternative. Here, we tested the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a VLP vaccine containing hemagglutinin (HA) and M1 from the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus (H1N1pdm) in ferrets and compared intramuscular (i.m.) and intranasal (i.n.) routes of immunization. Vaccination of ferrets with VLPs containing the M1 and HA proteins from A/California/04/2009 (H1N1pdm) induced high antibody titers and conferred significant protection against virus challenge. VLP-vaccinated animals lost less weight, shed less virus in nasal washes, and had markedly lower virus titers in all organs tested than naïve controls. A single dose of VLPs, either i.m. or i.n., induced higher levels of antibody than did two doses of commercial split vaccine. Ferrets vaccinated with split vaccine were incompletely protected against challenge; these animals had lower virus titers in olfactory bulbs, tonsils, and intestines, but lost weight and shed virus in nasal washes to a similar extent as naïve controls. Challenge with heterologous A/Brisbane/59/07 (H1N1) virus revealed that the VLPs conferred minimal cross-protection to heterologous infection, as revealed by the lack of reduction in nasal wash and lung virus titers and slightly higher weight loss relative to controls. In summary, these experiments demonstrate the strong immunogenicity and protective efficacy of VLPs compared to the split vaccine and show that i.n. vaccination with VLPs has the potential for highly efficacious vaccination against influenza.     

Cross-protection against influenza A virus infection by passively transferred respiratory tract IgA antibodies to different hemagglutinin molecules.

Mice that were intranasally immunized with different influenza A virus hemagglutinins (HA), derived from PR8 (H1N1), A/Yamagata (H1N1) or A/Fukuoka (H3N2) virus, together with cholera toxin B subunit as an adjuvant, were examined for protection against PR8 infection; PR8 HA and A/Yamagata HA immunization conferred complete protection, while A/Fukuoka HA immunization failed to confer protection. In parallel with protection, PR8 HA-, A/Yamagata HA-, and A/Fukuoka HA-immunized mice produced a high, a moderate and a low level of PR8 HA-reactive IgA in the respiratory tract, respectively. These IgA antibodies were not only higher in content in the nasal secretions, but also more cross-reactive than IgG. The purified IgA antibodies from respiratory tract washings of PR8 HA-immunized mice, which contained the HA-specific IgA corresponding to the amount detected in the nasal wash, were able to protect mice from PR8 challenge when transferred to the respiratory tract of naive mice. The transfer of IgA from A/Yamagata HA-immunized mice also afforded cross-protection against PR8 infection, whereas the IgA from A/Fukuoka HA-immunized mice failed to provide protection. The ability of transferred IgA to prevent viral infection was dependent on the amount of HA-reactive IgA remaining in the respiratory tract of the host at the time of infection. These experiments directly demonstrate that IgA antibodies to influenza A virus HA by themselves play a pivotal role in defence not only against homologous virus infection, but also against heterologous drift virus infection at the respiratory mucosa, the portal of entry for the viruses.     

Reassortment and evolution of current human influenza A and B viruses

During the 2001-2002 influenza season, human influenza A (H1N2) reassortant viruses were detected globally. The hemagglutinin (HA) of these H1N2 viruses was similar to that of the A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) vaccine strain both antigenically and genetically, while their neuraminidase (NA) was antigenically and genetically related to that of recent human influenza H3N2 reference viruses such as A/Moscow/10/99. All six internal genes of the H1N2 reassortants originated from an H3N2 virus. After being detected only in eastern Asia during the past 10 years, Influenza B/Victoria/2/87 lineage viruses reappeared in many countries outside of Asia in 2001. Additionally, reassortant influenza B viruses possessing an HA similar to that of B/Shandong/7/97, a recent B/Victoria/2/87 lineage reference strain, and an NA closely related to that of B/Sichuan/379/99, a recent B/Yamagata/16/88 lineage reference strain, were isolated globally and became the predominant influenza B epidemic strain. The current influenza vaccine is expected to provide good protection against H1N2 viruses because it contains A/New Caledonia/20/99 (H1N1) and A/Panama/2007/99 (H3N2) like viruses whose H1 HA or N2 NA are antigenically similar to those of recent circulating H1N2 viruses. On the other hand, widespread circulation of influenza B Victoria lineage viruses required inclusion of a strain from this lineage in influenza vaccines for the 2002-2003 season.     

Classical swine H1N1 influenza viruses confer cross protection from swine-origin 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus infection in mice and ferrets

The hemagglutinin of the 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza virus is a derivative of and is antigenically related to classical swine but not to seasonal human H1N1 viruses. We compared the A/California/7/2009 (CA/7/09) virus recommended by the WHO as the reference virus for vaccine development, with two classical swine influenza viruses A/swine/Iowa/31 (sw/IA/31) and A/New Jersey/8/1976 (NJ/76) to establish the extent of immunologic cross-reactivity and cross-protection in animal models. Primary infection with 2009 pandemic or NJ/76 viruses elicited antibodies against the CA/7/09 virus and provided complete protection from challenge with this virus in ferrets; the response in mice was variable and conferred partial protection. Although ferrets infected with sw/IA/31 virus developed low titers of cross-neutralizing antibody, they were protected from pulmonary replication of the CA/7/09 virus. The data suggest that prior exposure to antigenically related H1N1 viruses of swine-origin provide some protective immunity against the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus.     

新型甲型H1N1流感病毒HA基因DNA疫苗诱导小鼠产生中和抗体

目的 探讨新型甲型流感病毒(2009H1N1)血凝素(HA)DNA疫苗诱导小鼠产生中和抗体特性.方法 构建2009H1N1或1918甲型流感病毒(1918H1N1)HA蛋白表达质粒2009HA和1918HA,采用25μg或200μg剂量2009HA质粒免疫小鼠,以2009HA或1918HA蛋白为包被抗原,测定小鼠血清中2009HA抗体总量或交叉反应抗体含量,分别用2009H1N1和1918H1N1两种假病毒(pp)测定抗体中和活性.结果 25 μg或200μg的2009HA质粒加强免疫小鼠后,4～16周内两组小鼠血清中2009HA总抗体水平以及对2009H1N1pp的中和抗体滴度相似(P>0.05),都含有与1918HA蛋白交叉反应抗体,对1918H1N1pp的交叉中和抗体滴度相似(P>0.05).结论 小剂量2009HA质粒DNA疫苗能够诱导小鼠产生持久的高水平中和抗体,对于预防新现流感病毒具有潜在应用价值.     

Superior cross-protective effect of nasal vaccination to subcutaneous inoculation with influenza hemagglutinin vaccine.

Intranasal (i.n.) vs. subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of influenza hemagglutinin (HA) vaccine was systematically compared in BALB/c mice. Mice were immunized with different vaccines, together with cholera toxin B subunit as an adjuvant, and 4 weeks later were challenged with either a small (2 microliters) or a large (20 microliters) volume of mouse-adapted A/Guizhou-X (H3N2) virus, each of which gave virgin mice either a nasal or a lung predominant infection. Both i.n. and s.c. inoculations of A/Guizhou-X vaccine conferred almost complete protection against both challenges, i.n. inoculation of A/Fukuoka (H3N2) or A/Sichuan (H3N2) vaccine conferred almost complete cross-protection against 2-microliters challenge and a partial cross-protection against 20-microliters challenge, whereas the s.c. inoculation conferred no cross-protection against 2-microliters challenge with a partial cross-protection against 20-microliters challenge. Moreover, i.n. immunization of PR8 (H1N1) vaccine gave a slight cross-protection against 2-microliters challenge, while the s.c. inoculation did not. The degree of protection was easily improved by i.n. inoculation of higher doses of vaccine, but not by the s.c. inoculation. In parallel with the protection, the i.n. vaccination produced a high level of cross-reacting IgA and IgG antibody to A/Guizhou-X HA in nasal and broncho-alveolar washes, while the s.c. vaccination produced the cross-reacting IgG antibody alone. Thus, i.n. inoculation with inactivated vaccines, which induces cross-reacting anti-HA IgA antibody as well as IgG antibody, is more effective than s.c. vaccination for providing cross-protection against drift viruses.     

Feasibility of cross-protective vaccination against flaviviruses of the Japanese encephalitis serocomplex

Serological cross-reactivity providing cross-protective immunity between antigenically related viruses is a cornerstone of vaccination. It was the immunological basis for the first human vaccine against smallpox introduced more than 200 years ago, and continues to underpin modern vaccine development as has recently been shown for human papillomavirus vaccines, which confer cross-protection against other oncogenic papillomavirus types not present in the vaccine. Here, we review the feasibility of cross-protective vaccination against an antigenic group of clinically important viruses belonging to the Japanese encephalitis serocomplex in the Flaviviridae family. We will discuss evidence suggesting that 'new generation' flavivirus vaccines may provide effective cross-protective immunity against heterologous Japanese encephalitis serocomplex viruses, and appraise potential risks associated with cross-reactive vaccine immunity. The review will also focus on the structural and mechanistic basis for cross-protective immunity among this group of flaviviruses, which is predominantly mediated by antibodies against a single viral surface protein.     

Intranasal Immunization with a Formalin-Inactivated Human Influenza A Virus Whole-Virion Vaccine Alone and Intranasal Immunization with a Split-Virion Vaccine with Mucosal Adjuvants Show Similar Levels of Cross-Protection

The antigenicity of seasonal human influenza virus changes continuously; thus, a cross-protective influenza vaccine design needs to be established. Intranasal immunization with an influenza split-virion (SV) vaccine and a mucosal adjuvant induces cross-protection; however, no mucosal adjuvant has been assessed clinically. Formalin-inactivated intact human and avian viruses alone (without adjuvant) induce cross-protection against the highly pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus. However, it is unknown whether seasonal human influenza formalin-inactivated whole-virion (WV) vaccine alone induces cross-protection against strains within a subtype or in a different subtype of human influenza virus. Furthermore, there are few reports comparing the cross-protective efficacy of the WV vaccine and SV vaccine-mucosal adjuvant mixtures. Here, we found that the intranasal human influenza WV vaccine alone induced both the innate immune response and acquired immune response, resulting in cross-protection against drift variants within a subtype of human influenza virus. The cross-protective efficacy conferred by the WV vaccine in intranasally immunized mice was almost the same as that conferred by a mixture of SV vaccine and adjuvants. The level of cross-protective efficacy was correlated with the cross-reactive neutralizing antibody titer in the nasal wash and bronchoalveolar fluids. However, neither the SV vaccine with adjuvant nor the WV vaccine induced cross-reactive virus-specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte activity. These results suggest that the intranasal human WV vaccine injection alone is effective against variants within a virus subtype, mainly through a humoral immune response, and that the cross-protection elicited by the WV vaccine and the SV vaccine plus mucosal adjuvants is similar.     

Secretory IgA antibodies provide cross-protection against infection with different strains of influenza B virus

This study examined whether secretory IgA (S-IgA) antibodies (Abs) could confer cross-protective immunity against infection with influenza B viruses of antigenically distinct lineages. Wild-type or polymeric Ig receptor (pIgR)-knockout (KO) mice were immunized by infection with different B viruses or by intranasal (i.n.) administration with different inactivated vaccines. Four weeks later mice were challenged with either the B/Ibaraki/2/85 virus, representative of the B/Victoria/2/87 (B/Victoria)-lineage, or B/Yamagata/16/88 virus, representative of the B/Yamagata-lineage. Three days after challenge, nasal wash and serum specimens were assayed for IgA and IgG Abs specific for challenge viral antigens and for protection against challenge viruses. In wild-type mice, B/Ibaraki (or B/Yamagata) cross-reactive IgA Abs were detected at higher levels when infected or immunized with homologous-lineage viruses and at lower levels when infected or immunized with heterologous-lineage viruses. There was a correlation between the amount of nasal cross-reactive IgA Ab and the efficacy of cross-protection with a homologous-lineage virus. In mice lacking the pIgR, nasal cross-protective IgA Abs were only marginally detected in vaccinated mice and an accumulation of IgA in the serum was observed. This reduction of nasal IgA was accompanied by inefficient cross-protection against the B/Ibaraki (or B/Yamagata) virus infection. These results suggest that challenge viral-antigen cross-reactive S-IgA in nasal secretions induced by i.n. infection or vaccination is involved in providing cross-protection against challenge infection with virus within either the B/Victoria- or B/Yamagata-lineage.     

Immunization with a low dose of hemagglutinin-encoding plasmid protects against 2009 H1N1 pandemic influenza virus in mice

A vaccine against the novel pandemic influenza virus (2009 H1N1) is available, but several problems in preparation of vaccines against the new emerging influenza viruses need to be overcome. DNA vaccines represent a novel and powerful alternative to conventional vaccine approaches. To evaluate the ability of a DNA vaccine encoding the hemagglutinin (HA) of 2009 H1N1 to generate humoral responses and protective immunity, BALB/c mice were immunized with various doses of 2009 H1N1 HA-encoding plasmid and anti-HA total IgG, hemagglutination inhibition antibodies and neutralizing antibodies were assayed. The total IgG titers against HA correlated positively with the doses of DNA vaccine, but immunization with either a low dose (10 μg) or a higher dose (25-200 μg) of HA plasmid resulted in similar titers of hemagglutination inhibition and neutralizing antibodies, following a single booster. Further, 10 μg plasmid conferred effective protection against lethal virus challenge. These results suggested that the DNA vaccine encoding the HA of 2009 H1N1 virus is highly effective for inducing neutralizing antibodies and protective immunity. DNA vaccines are a promising new strategy for the rapid development of efficient vaccines to control new emerging pandemic influenza viruses.     

Induction of cross‐protective immunity against influenza A virus H5N1 by an intranasal vaccine with extracts of mushroom mycelia

The identification of a safe and effective adjuvant that is able to enhance mucosal immune responses is necessary for the development of an efficient inactivated intranasal influenza vaccine. The present study demonstrated the effectiveness of extracts of mycelia derived from edible mushrooms as adjuvants for intranasal influenza vaccine. The adjuvant effect of extracts of mycelia was examined by intranasal co‐administration of the extracts and inactivated A/PR8 (H1N1) influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) vaccine in BALB/c mice. The inactivated vaccine in combination with mycelial extracts induced a high anti‐A/PR8 HA‐specific IgA and IgG response in nasal washings and serum, respectively. Virus‐specific cytotoxic T‐lymphocyte responses were also induced by administration of the vaccine with extract of mycelia, resulting in protection against lethal lung infection with influenza virus A/PR8. In addition, intranasal administration of NIBRG14 vaccine derived from the influenza A/Vietnam/1194/2004 (H5N1) virus strain administered in conjunction with mycelial extracts from Phellinus linteus conferred cross‐protection against heterologous influenza A/Indonesia/6/2005 virus challenge in the nasal infection model. In addition, mycelial extracts induced proinflammatory cytokines and CD40 expression in bone marrow‐derived dendritic cells. These results suggest that mycelial extract‐adjuvanted vaccines can confer cross‐protection against variant H5N1 influenza viruses. The use of extracts of mycelia derived from edible mushrooms is proposed as a new safe and effective mucosal adjuvant for use for nasal vaccination against influenza virus infection. J. Med. Virol. 82:128–137, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

IgM,IgG, and IgA Antibody Responses to Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 Hemagglutinin in Infected Persons during the First Wave of the 2009 Pandemic in the United States

The novel influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus caused an influenza pandemic in 2009. IgM, IgG, and IgA antibody responses to A(H1N1)pdm09 hemagglutinin (HA) following A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infection were analyzed to understand antibody isotype responses. Age-matched control sera collected from U.S. residents in 2007 and 2008 were used to establish baseline levels of cross-reactive antibodies. IgM responses often used as indicators of primary virus infection were mainly detected in young patient groups (≤5 years and 6 to 15 years old), not in older age groups, despite the genetic and antigenic differences between the HA of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus and pre-2009 seasonal H1N1 viruses. IgG and IgA responses to A(H1N1)pdm09 HA were detected in all age groups of infected persons. In persons 17 to 80 years old, paired acute- and convalescent-phase serum samples demonstrated ≥4-fold increases in the IgG and IgA responses to A(H1N1)pdm09 HA in 80% and 67% of A(H1N1)pdm09 virus-infected persons, respectively. The IgG antibody response to A(H1N1)pdm09 HA was cross-reactive with HAs from H1, H3, H5, and H13 subtypes, suggesting that infections with subtypes other than A(H1N1)pdm09 might result in false positives by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Lower sensitivity compared to hemagglutination inhibition and microneutralization assays and the detection of cross-reactive antibodies against homologous and heterologous subtype are major drawbacks for the application of ELISA in influenza serologic studies.     

Protection against influenza virus infection by intranasal administration of hemagglutinin vaccine with chitin microparticles as an adjuvant

Chitin in the form of microparticles (chitin microparticles, CMP) has been demonstrated to be a potent stimulator of macrophages, promoting T-helper-1 (Th1) activation and cytokine response. In order to examine the mucosal adjuvant effect of CMP co-administered with influenza hemagglutinin (HA) vaccine against influenza infection, CMP were intranasally co-administered with influenza HA vaccine prepared from PR8 (H1N1) virus. Inoculation of the vaccine with CMP induced primary and secondary anti-HA IgA responses in the nasal wash and anti-HA IgG responses in the serum, which were significantly higher than those of nasal vaccination without CMP, and provided a complete protection against a homologous influenza virus challenge in the nasal infection influenza model. In addition, CMP-based immunization using A/Yamagata (H1N1) and A/Guizhou (H3N2) induced PR8 HA-reactive IgA in the nasal washes and specific-IgG in the serum. The immunization with A/Yamagata and CMP resulted in complete protection against a PR8 (H1N1) challenge in A/Yamagata (H1N1)-vaccinated mice, while that with A/Guizhou (H3N2) and CMP exhibited a 100-fold reduction of nasal virus titer, demonstrating the cross-protective effect of CMP and influenza vaccine. It is suggested that CMP provide a safe and effective adjuvant for nasal vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccine.     

Protective Efficacy of the Conserved NP,PB1, and M1 Proteins as Immunogens in DNA- and Vaccinia Virus-Based Universal Influenza A Virus Vaccines in Mice

The conventional hemagglutinin (HA)- and neuraminidase (NA)-based influenza vaccines need to be updated most years and are ineffective if the glycoprotein HA of the vaccine strains is a mismatch with that of the epidemic strain. Universal vaccines targeting conserved viral components might provide cross-protection and thus complement and improve conventional vaccines. In this study, we generated DNA plasmids and recombinant vaccinia viruses expressing the conserved proteins nucleoprotein (NP), polymerase basic 1 (PB1), and matrix 1 (M1) from influenza virus strain A/Beijing/30/95 (H3N2). BALB/c mice were immunized intramuscularly with a single vaccine based on NP, PB1, or M1 alone or a combination vaccine based on all three antigens and were then challenged with lethal doses of the heterologous influenza virus strain A/PR/8/34 (H1N1). Vaccines based on NP, PB1, and M1 provided complete or partial protection against challenge with 1.7 50% lethal dose (LD₅₀) of PR8 in mice. Of the three antigens, NP-based vaccines induced protection against 5 LD₅₀ and 10 LD₅₀ and thus exhibited the greatest protective effect. Universal influenza vaccines based on the combination of NP, PB1, and M1 induced a strong immune response and thus might be an alternative approach to addressing future influenza virus pandemics.     

Antibody Breadth and Protective Efficacy Are Increased by Vaccination with Computationally Optimized Hemagglutinin but Not with Polyvalent Hemagglutinin-Based H5N1 Virus-Like Particle Vaccines

One of the challenges for developing an H5N1 influenza vaccine is the diversity of antigenically distinct isolates within this subtype. Previously, our group described a novel hemagglutinin (HA) derived from a methodology termed computationally optimized broadly reactive antigen (COBRA). This COBRA HA, when used as an immunogen, elicits a broad antibody response against H5N1 isolates from different clades. In this report, the immune responses elicited by the COBRA HA virus-like particle (VLP) vaccine were compared to responses elicited by a mixture of VLPs expressing representative HA molecules from clade 2.1, 2.2, and 2.3 primary H5N1 isolates (polyvalent). The COBRA HA VLP vaccine elicited higher-titer antibodies to a panel of H5N1 HA proteins than did the other VLPs. Both COBRA and polyvalent vaccines protected vaccinated mice and ferrets from experimental infection with highly lethal H5N1 influenza viruses, but COBRA-vaccinated animals had decreased viral replication, less inflammation in the lungs of mice, and reduced virus recovery in ferret nasal washes. Both vaccines had similar cellular responses postchallenge, indicating that higher-titer serum antibodies likely restrict the duration of viral replication. Furthermore, passively transferred immune serum from the COBRA HA VLP-vaccinated mice protected recipient animals more efficiently than immune serum from polyvalent-vaccinated mice. This is the first report comparing these two vaccine strategies. The single COBRA HA antigen elicited a broader antibody response and reduced morbidity and viral titers more effectively than a polyvalent mixture of primary H5N1 HA antigens.     

Evaluation of a genetically modified reassortant H5N1 influenza A virus vaccine candidate generated by plasmid-based reverse genetics

Avian influenza A H5N1 viruses similar to those that infected humans in Hong Kong in 1997 continue to circulate in waterfowl and have reemerged in poultry in the region, raising concerns that these viruses could reappear in humans. The currently licensed trivalent inactivated influenza vaccines contain hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase genes from epidemic strains in a background of internal genes derived from the vaccine donor strain, A/Puerto Rico/8/34 (PR8). Such reassortant candidate vaccine viruses are currently not licensed for the prevention of human infections by H5N1 influenza viruses. A transfectant H5N1/PR8 virus was generated by plasmid-based reverse genetics. The removal of the multibasic amino acid motif in the HA gene associated with high pathogenicity in chickens, and the new genotype of the H5N1/PR8 transfectant virus, attenuated the virus for chickens and mice without altering the antigenicity of the HA. A Formalin-inactivated vaccine prepared from this virus was immunogenic and protected mice from subsequent wild-type H5N1 virus challenge. This is the first successful attempt to develop an H5N1 vaccine seed virus resembling those used in currently licensed influenza A vaccines with properties that make it a promising candidate for further evaluation in humans.     

Protection against multiple influenza A virus subtypes by intranasal administration of recombinant nucleoprotein

Vaccination is a cost-effective way to control the influenza epidemic. Vaccines based on highly conserved antigens can provide protection against different influenza A strains and subtypes. In this study, the recombinant nucleoprotein (rNP) of the A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) influenza virus strain was effectively expressed using a prokaryotic expression system and then purified with a nickel-charged Sepharose affinity column as a candidate component for an influenza vaccine. The rNP was administered intranasally three times at 3-week intervals to female BALB/c mice in combination with an adjuvant (cholera toxin B subunit containing 0.2% of the whole toxin). Twenty-one days after the last immunization, the mice were challenged with homologous or heterologous influenza viruses at a lethal dose. The results showed that intranasal immunization of 10 μg rNP with adjuvant completely protected the immunized mice against the homologous influenza virus, and immunization with 100 μg rNP in combination with adjuvant provided good cross-protection against heterologous H5N1 and H9N2 avian influenza viruses. The results indicate that such a vaccine administered intranasally can induce mucosal and cell-mediated immunity, thus having the potential to control epidemics caused by new emerging influenza viruses.     

Genotype Considerations for Virus-Like Particle-Based Bivalent Norovirus Vaccine Composition

Norovirus (NoV) genogroup I (GI) and GII are responsible for most human infections with NoV. Because of the high genetic variability of NoV, natural infection does not induce sufficient protective immunity to different genotypes or to variants of the same genotype and there is little or no cross-protection against different genogroups. NoV-derived virus-like particles (VLPs) are promising vaccine candidates that induce high levels of NoV-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. It is believed that a bivalent NoV vaccine consisting of a representative VLP from GI and GII is a minimum requirement for an effective vaccine. Here, we compared the abilities of monovalent immunizations with NoV GI.1-2001, GI.3-2002, GII.4-1999, and GII.4-2010 New Orleans VLPs to induce NoV type-specific and cross-reactive immune responses and protective blocking antibody responses in BALB/c mice. All of the VLPs induced comparable levels of type-specific serum IgG antibodies, as well as blocking antibodies to the VLPs used for immunization. However, the abilities of different VLP genotypes to induce cross-reactive IgG and cross-blocking antibodies varied remarkably. Our results confirm previous findings of a lack of cross-protective immune responses between GI and GII NoVs. These data support the rationale for including NoV GI.3 and GII.4-1999 VLPs in the bivalent vaccine formulation, which could be sufficient to induce protective immune responses across NoV genotypes in the two common genogroups in humans.     

Efficacy of a high-growth reassortant H1N1 influenza virus vaccine against the classical swine H1N1 subtype influenza virus in mice and pigs

Swine influenza (SI) is an acute, highly contagious respiratory disease caused by swine influenza A viruses (SwIVs), and it poses a potential global threat to human health. Classical H1N1 (cH1N1) SwIVs are still circulating and remain the predominant subtype in the swine population in China. In this study, a high-growth reassortant virus (GD/PR8) harboring the hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes from a novel cH1N1 isolate in China, A/Swine/Guangdong/1/2011 (GD/11) and six internal genes from the high-growth A/Puerto Rico/8/34(PR8) virus was generated by plasmid-based reverse genetics and tested as a candidate seed virus for the preparation of an inactivated vaccine. The protective efficacy of this vaccine was evaluated in mice and pigs challenged with GD/11 virus. Prime and boost inoculation of GD/PR8 vaccine yielded high-titer serum hemagglutination inhibiting (HI) antibodies and IgG antibodies for GD/11 in both mice and pigs. Complete protection of mice and pigs against cH1N1 SIV challenge was observed, with significantly fewer lung lesions and reduced viral shedding in vaccine-inoculated animals compared with unvaccinated control animals. Our data demonstrated that the GD/PR8 may serve as the seed virus for a promising SwIVs vaccine to protect the swine population.