Species differences in mu- and delta-opioid receptors.

The mu opioid receptor ligand [D-Ala2, NMePhe4, Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAGO) and delta opioid receptor ligand [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE) show similar specificity in competition binding studies in whole brain homogenate in rat and mouse. However, in saturation studies, the density and affinity of DPDPE binding sites were substantially greater in the mouse. There was no difference between the mouse and rat in the density and affinity of DAGO sites. Results from dose-response studies for analgesia using the same ligands administered i.c.v. in both species paralleled the binding studies. DAGO was approximately 2 times more potent in the mouse compared to the rat; while DPDPE was more than 15 times more potent in the mouse. Thus, binding capacity and affinity differences appear to be related to the functional potency of the mu and delta ligands in the two species. These results suggest that the difference in potency of DPDPE between rat and mouse is related to the differences in brain delta opioid receptors.     

Overexpression of dynamin is induced by chronic stimulation of mu- but not delta-opioid receptors: relationships with mu-related morphine dependence

Several studies using selective opioid agonists or mice with a deletion of the mu-opioid receptor, have shown that morphine dependence is essentially due to chronic stimulation of mu- but not delta-opioid receptors. Because dependence is assumed to be related to persistent intracellular modifications, we have investigated modifications putatively induced by chronic activation of mu receptors with morphine or selective agonists in vitro in SH-SY5Y cells and in vivo in different strains of mice, including mice lacking the mu-opioid receptor gene. The results show a similar down-regulation and desensitization of mu and delta binding sites, whereas an overexpression of dynamin occurred only with mu agonists, strongly suggesting the relevance of this up-regulation with the opiate dependence. Moreover, translocation of overexpressed dynamin from intracellular pools to plasma membranes was observed in chronic morphine-treated rats. This recruitment could be critically involved in long-lasting changes such as alterations of axonal transport observed in opioid dependence.     

Differential binding properties of oripavines at cloned mu- and delta-opioid receptors.

This study examines the possibility that oripavine opioid receptor agonists bind equally to both high and low affinity states of the mu-opioid receptor. Studies were performed in C6 cells expressing mu- or delta-opioid receptors; high and low agonist affinity states of the receptors were defined by the absence and presence, respectively of Na+ ions and the GTP analog Gpp(NH)p. At the mu-opioid receptor dihydroetorphine and etorphine were full agonists, buprenorphine had moderate efficacy while diprenorphine was an antagonist. At the delta-opioid receptor, dihydroetorphine, etorphine, and diprenorphine had moderate efficacy while buprenorphine was an antagonist. The binding affinities of the oripavines at the mu-opioid receptor decreased only one to 2-fold in the presence of NaCl and Gpp(NH)p. In contrast, decreases in oripavine affinity at the delta-opioid receptor correlated with delta-opioid receptor efficacy. The ability of oripavine agonists to bind with high affinity to the low agonist affinity state of the nu-opioid receptor may explain the high potencies of these compounds in vivo.     

Contribution of supraspinal mu- and delta-opioid receptors to antinociception in the rat.

This study evaluated the contribution of supraspinal opioid receptors to the production of antinociception, in the rat. I.c.v. administration of a selective mu- (DAMGO) and a selective delta- (DPDPE), but not a selective kappa- (U50,488H) opioid receptor agonist, produced significant dose-dependent increase in mechanical nociceptive thresholds. ICI 174,864, a delta-opioid receptor antagonist, completely blocked the antinociceptive effects produced by DPDPE ([D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin) at a dose that had no effect on the increases in nociceptive thresholds produced by DAMGO ([D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin). The simultaneous i.c.v. administration of a low-antinociceptive dose of DAMGO or DPDPE given in combination with sequentially increasing doses of the other opioid agonist, produced synergy (i.e., a more than additive antinociceptive effect), at the lower doses tested. The results of these experiments provide evidence to support the suggestion that both supraspinal mu- and delta-opioid receptors contribute to the production of antinociception, in the rat.     

Activation of mu- and delta-opioid receptors present on the same nerve terminals depresses transmitter release in the mouse hypogastric ganglion.

1. The inhibitory actions of mu- and delta-opioid receptor agonists on the strong, single fibre synaptic input to neurones contained in the mouse hypogastric ganglion have been examined. 2. The opioid agonists [D-Ala2,NMePhe4,Gly-ol5]enkephalin (DAMGO, 10 nM-10 microM), morphine (10-30 [D-Ser2,Leu5,Thr6]enkephalin (DSLET, 3 nM-1 microM), [D-Pen2,D-Pen5]enkephalin (DPDPE, 10 nM-10 microM), all depressed the single fibre, all-or-nothing, nicotinic, excitatory synaptic potential (e.p.s.p.) recorded in mouse hypogastric ganglion neurones. U50488H (0.3-1 microM) was without effect. 3. The effect of DSLET, but not that of DAMGO, was reversed by the delta-opioid receptor-selective antagonist, ICI 174864 (0.3 microM). Naloxone (0.3 microM) antagonized the effect of both DSLET and DAMGO. 4. The site of action of the mu- and delta-receptor agonists was on the presynaptic terminals, since at the concentrations which depressed the e.p.s.p. these drugs did not affect the resting membrane potential or input resistance of the postganglionic neurone body, nor did they depress the postganglionic, nicotinic response to exogenously applied acetylcholine. 5. Quantal analysis further confirmed the presynaptic site of action; mu- and delta-opioid receptor agonists decreased the mean number of quanta released per stimulus but did not reduce the mean amplitude of the quantal unit. 6. It was concluded that mu- and delta-opioid receptors were located on the same presynaptic nerve terminals since, in the same neurones, mu- and delta-opioid receptor agonists depressed the same single fibre inputs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Binding site of loperamide: automated docking of loperamide in human mu- and delta-opioid receptors

Loperamide is a piperidine analogue, acting as agonist on peripheral opioid receptors, exhibiting affinity and selectivity for the cloned mu human opioid receptor compared with the delta human opioid receptor. Automatic docking studies of loperamide, using AutoDock, on human mu- and delta-opioid receptors is described. Whilst no meaningful difference was detected concerning the docking of the arylpiperidine moiety, mu/delta selectivity could be explained as a different accommodation of the two phenyl groups in two lipophylic pockets of receptors.     

The R7 subfamily of RGS proteins assists tachyphylaxis and acute tolerance at mu-opioid receptors.

Members of the R7 subfamily of regulators of G-protein signaling (RGS) proteins (RGS6, RGS7, RGS9-2, and RGS11) are found in the mouse CNS. The expression of these proteins was effectively reduced in different neural structures by blocking their mRNA with antisense oligodeoxynucleotides (ODNs). This was achieved without noticeable changes in the binding characteristics of labeled beta-endorphin to opioid receptors. Knockdown of R7 proteins enhanced the potency of antinociception promoted by morphine and [D-Ala(2), N-MePhe(4), Gly-ol(5)]-enkephalin (DAMGO)-both agonists at mu-opioid receptors. The duration of morphine analgesia was greatly increased in RGS9-2 and in RGS11 knockdown mice. The impairment of R7 proteins brought about different changes in the analgesic activity of selective delta agonists. Knockdown of RGS11 reduced [D-Ala(2)]deltorphin II analgesic effects. Those of RGS6 and RGS9-2 proteins caused [D-Ala(2)]deltorphin II to produce a smoothened time-course curve-the peak effect blunted and analgesia extended during the declining phase. RGS9-2 impairment also promoted a similar pattern of change for [D-Pen(2,5)]-enkephalin (DPDPE). RGS7-deficient mice showed an increased response to both [D-Ala(2)]deltorphin II and DPDPE analgesic effects. A single intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) ED(80) analgesic dose of morphine gave rise to acute tolerance in control mice, but did not promote tolerance in RGS6, RGS7, RGS9-2, or RGS11 knockdown animals. Thus, R7 proteins play a critical role in agonist tachyphylaxis and acute tolerance at mu-opioid receptors, and show differences in their modulation of delta-opioid receptors.     

Role of mu- and delta-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens in turning behaviour of rats

The role of mu-, delta1- and delta2-opioid receptors in the nucleus accumbens in pivoting was investigated in freely moving rats. Unilateral injections of the mu-opioid receptor agonist, [D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly5-ol]-enkephalin (DAMGO, 1 and 2 microg) and the delta2-opioid receptor agonist, deltorphin II (1 and 2 microg), but not the delta1-opioid receptor agonist, [D-Pen(2,5)]-enkephalin (DPDPE, 1-4 microg), into the shell or the core of the nucleus accumbens significantly induced contraversive pivoting. The pivoting induced by DAMGO (2 microg) and deltorphin II (2 microg) was inhibited significantly by the mu-opioid receptor antagonist, D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Phe-Thr-NH2 (CTOP, 0.1 and 1 microg), and the delta2-opioid receptor antagonist, naltriben (NTB, 0.1 and 1 mg/kg, i.p.), respectively. The DAMGO (2 microg)- or deltorphin II (2 microg)-induced pivoting was also inhibited significantly by co-administration of the dopamine D1/D2 receptor antagonist, cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 and 10 microg). The pivoting induced by unilateral injections of a mixture of dopamine D1 (SKF 38393, 5 microg) and D2 (quinpirole, 10 microg) receptor agonists into the shell was significantly inhibited by cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 and 10 microg) or NTB (1 and 3 mg/kg, i.p.), but not CTOP (1 microg) or delta1-opioid receptor antagonist, (E)-7-benzylidenenaltrexone (1 mg/kg, i.p.). The contraversive pivoting elicited by the cholinergic agonist, carbachol (5 microg), into the core was inhibited by co-administration of the muscarinic M1 antagonist, pirenzepine (1 microg), but not cis(Z)-flupentixol (1 microg). The results suggest that unilateral activation of mu- or delta2-opioid, but not delta1-opioid, receptors in the core and/or shell of the nucleus accumbens elicits contraversive pivoting that requires intact dopamine D1/D2 receptors in the shell, but not intact muscarinic M1 mechanism in the core. The study also shows that delta2-opioid, but not mu- and delta1-opioid, receptors in the core and/or shell modulate the shell-specific, dopamine D1/D2 receptor mechanisms involved in the production of pivoting.     

Expression of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization after short- and long-term withdrawal periods: participation of mu- and delta-opioid receptors.

Repeated amphetamine administration results in behavioral sensitization, an enduring behavioral transformation expressed after short and long periods of withdrawal. To investigate the participation of the opioid system in amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization, we studied the effect of naloxone, an opioid receptor antagonist, on the expression of behavioral sensitization tested after short- (2 days) and long-term (14 days) withdrawal periods. In addition, using quantitative competitive RT-PCR, we examined the levels of mu-opioid receptor (MOR) and delta-opioid receptor (DOR) mRNA in the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcSh) and ventral tegmental area (VTA) of behaviorally sensitized rats, at these two withdrawal times. This study showed that whereas naloxone did not modify the expression of behavioral sensitization tested after 2 days of withdrawal, it completely blocked the expression when tested after 14 days of withdrawal. DOR and MOR mRNA levels were not modified in the NAcSh of rats expressing behavioral sensitization after 2 or 14 days of withdrawal. Conversely, DOR and MOR mRNA levels were elevated in the VTA of animals expressing behavioral sensitization after 2 days of withdrawal. However, whereas DOR mRNA returned to control levels, MOR mRNA levels remained elevated in animals expressing behavioral sensitization after 14 days of withdrawal. These results indicate a striking difference between the role played by opioid receptors in the expression of amphetamine-induced behavioral sensitization, when tested after short- or long-term withdrawal periods. In addition, our results support the notion that repeated amphetamine-induced changes in opioid receptor expression may contribute to the perpetuation of psychostimulant abuse and/or relapse.     

Ketamine retards chronic but not acute tolerance to ethanol.

Motor impairment (tilt-plane test) was used to investigate whether the noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist ketamine prevents the development of chronic and acute tolerance to ethanol. Rats were treated with ethanol or saline in the presence and absence of ketamine (separate groups) for 10 days and tested for ethanol tolerance in the absence of ketamine on the fifth and tenth days. In other studies, the effect of ketamine on acute tolerance to ethanol was examined. Rats that received ethanol daily without ketamine showed significant tolerance to ethanol on days 5 and 10, but those receiving ethanol plus ketamine daily showed significantly less tolerance to ethanol. Thus, ketamine interfered with the development of chronic tolerance just as it had been found previously to prevent rapid tolerance. In contrast, ketamine failed to block acute tolerance to ethanol. These results would suggest that the phenomena of acute tolerance and chronic tolerance have differences not previously reported.     

Dopamine D1 receptors and adenosine A1 receptors in the rat nucleus accumbens regulate motor activity but not prepulse inhibition

Locomotor activity and sensorimotor gating (measured as prepulse inhibition of startle) are regulated by mesoaccumbal dopamine. Recent evidence indicated antagonistic interactions between adenosine A(1) receptors and dopamine D(1) receptors, as well as between adenosine A(2) receptors and dopamine D(2) receptors in the nucleus accumbens. Therefore, it is conceivable that accumbal dopamine and adenosine are both involved in the regulation of prepulse inhibition and locomotion. We tested whether accumbal adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors control locomotor activity and prepulse inhibition using the following four treatments. (1) Injections of the selective adenosine A(1) receptor agonist N(6)-cyclopentanyladenosine (CPA 1.5 and 3 microg/microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens. (2) Stimulation of the ventral tegmental area by local infusion of the GABA(A) receptor antagonist picrotoxin (25-100 ng/0.5 microl bilaterally). (3) Picrotoxin injections into the ventral tegmental area (100 ng/0.5 microl) and simultaneous bilateral injections of CPA (3 microg/microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens. (4) Injections of the selective dopamine D(1) receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (3 microg/0.5 microl per side) into the nucleus accumbens and ventral tegmental area stimulation by picrotoxin. Intra-accumbal CPA infusion reduced locomotor activity but had no effect on prepulse inhibition. Picrotoxin stimulation of the ventral tegmental area increased locomotor activity which was antagonized by co-administration of CPA or SCH 23390 into the nucleus accumbens. An enhancement of prepulse inhibition was observed after stimulation of the ventral tegmental area and co-administration of SCH 23390 into the nucleus accumbens. These findings demonstrate that adenosine A(1) and dopamine D(1) receptors are involved in the regulation of locomotor activity mediated by the mesoaccumbal dopamine system. The finding that locomotor effects induced by stimulation of the mesoaccumbal dopamine system were not accompanied by a prepulse inhibition-deficit suggests a dissociation of the neuronal substrates involved in the control of locomotion and the regulation of sensorimotor gating.     

Brain regional Fos expression elicited by the activation of mu- but not delta-opioid receptors of the ventral tegmental area: evidence for an implication of the ventral thalamus in opiate reward.

Both mu-opioid receptors (MORs) and delta-opioid receptors (DORs) are expressed in the ventral tegmental area (VTA) and are thought to be involved in the addictive properties of opiates. However, their respective contributions to opiate reward remain unclear. We used intracranial self-administration (ICSA) to study the rewarding effects of morphine microinjections into the VTA of male and female MOR-/- and DOR-/- mice. In brains of mice tested for intra-VTA morphine self-administration, we analyzed regional Fos protein expression to investigate the neural circuitry underlying this behavior. Male and female WT and DOR-/- mice exhibited similar self-administration performances, whereas knockout of the MOR gene abolished intra-VTA morphine self-administration at all doses tested. Naloxone (4 mg/kg) disrupted this behavior in WT and DOR mutants, without triggering physical signs of withdrawal. Morphine ICSA was associated with an increase in Fos within the nucleus accumbens, striatum, limbic cortices, amygdala, hippocampus, the lateral mammillary nucleus (LM), and the ventral posteromedial thalamus (VPM). This latter structure was found to express high levels of Fos exclusively in self-administering WT and DOR-/- mice. Abolition of morphine reward in MOR-/- mice was associated with a decrease in Fos-positive neurons in the mesocorticolimbic dopamine system, amygdala, hippocampus (CA1), LM, and a complete absence within the VPM. We conclude that (i) VTA MORs, but not DORs, are critical for morphine reward and (ii) the role of VTA-thalamic projections in opiate reward deserves to be further explored.     

Interaction of co-expressed mu- and delta-opioid receptors in transfected rat pituitary GH(3) cells

mu- and delta-Opioid agonists interact in a synergistic manner to produce analgesia in several animal models. Additionally, receptor binding studies using membranes derived from brain tissue indicate that interactions between mu- and delta-opioid receptors might be responsible for the observation of multiple opioid receptor subtypes. To examine potential interactions between mu- and delta-opioid receptors, we examined receptor binding and functional characteristics of mu-, delta-, or both mu- and delta-opioid receptors stably transfected in rat pituitary GH(3) cells (GH(3)MOR, GH(3)DOR, and GH(3)MORDOR, respectively). Saturation and competition binding experiments revealed that coexpression of mu- and delta-opioid receptors resulted in the appearance of multiple affinity states for mu- but not delta-opioid receptors. Additionally, coadministration of selective mu- and delta-opioid agonists in GH(3)MORDOR cells resulted in a synergistic competition with [(3)H][D-Pen(2,5)]enkephalin (DPDPE) for delta-opioid receptors. Finally, when equally effective concentrations of [D-Ala(2),N-MePhe(4),Gly-ol(5)]enkephalin (DAMGO) and two different delta-opioid agonists (DPDPE or 2-methyl-4a alpha-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-1,2,3,4,4a,5,12,12a alpha-octahydroquinolino-[2,3,3-g]-isoquinoline; TAN67) were coadministered in GH(3)MORDOR cells, a synergistic inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity was observed. These results strongly suggest that cotransfection of mu- and delta-opioid receptors alters the binding and functional characteristics of the receptors. Therefore, we propose that the simultaneous exposure of GH(3)MORDOR cells to selective mu- and delta-opioid agonists produces an interaction between receptors resulting in enhanced receptor binding. This effect is translated into an augmented ability of these agonists to inhibit adenylyl cyclase activity. Similar interactions occurring in neurons that express both mu- and delta-opioid receptors could explain observations of multiple opioid receptor subtypes in receptor binding studies and the synergistic interaction of mu- and delta-opioids in analgesic assays.     

Dextromethorphan and ketamine potentiate the antinociceptive effects of mu- but not delta- or kappa-opioid agonists in a mouse model of acute pain

Animal and clinical studies have reported potentiation of opioid antinociception by NMDA receptor antagonists such as ketamine and dextromethorphan. The aim of this study was to compare these clinically available NMDA antagonists in combination with classical morphine, mu-selective fentanyl-like opioids, the delta-opioid agonist SNC80 and the kappa-opioid agonist U50,488H. Using a mouse hot-plate test, dose-response relationships were first determined for all compounds individually and then for opioids co-administered with fixed doses of ketamine or dextromethorphan. All compounds were administered intraperitoneally ED(50) values were calculated from the proportion of animals failing to exhibit any response within a fixed cut-off criterion of 30 s. To varying degrees, all compounds produced increases in response latencies over time. Dextromethorphan produced lower ED(50) values for morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil but exerted no effect on the potency of SNC80 or U50,488H. Similarly, ketamine potentiated the antinociceptive potency of morphine, fentanyl and sufentanil but not SNC80 or U50,488H. In summary, these results support the use of mu-opioid agonists in combination with NMDA antagonists, but suggest that there may be no advantage in combining dextromethorphan or ketamine with delta- or kappa-opioids in the management of acute pain.     

Sigma-1 receptors do not regulate calcium influx through voltage-dependent calcium channels in mouse brain synaptosomes

Several lines of evidence suggest that σ(1) receptors regulate intracellular calcium concentration [Ca(2+)](i). However, no previous studies have demonstrated a consistent role for these receptors in the modulation of extracellular calcium entry through plasmalemmal voltage-dependent calcium channels (VDCCs). To search for evidence of such a role we compared [Ca(2+)](i) under basal conditions and after depolarization with KCl in fura-2-loaded synaptosomes from wild-type and σ(1) receptor knockout (σ(1)R-KO) mice. We also tested the effects of the selective σ(1) receptor agonists PRE-084 and (+)-pentazocine and antagonists BD-1047 and NE-100 on the increase in [Ca(2+)](i) induced by depolarization with 60mM KCl. Mibefradil, a nonselective blocker of VDCCs, was used as a positive control. Basal [Ca(2+)](i) and the increase in [Ca(2+)](i) caused by KCl-induced depolarization were similar in brain synaptosomes from both wild-type and σ(1)R-KO mice. Mibefradil (1-30 μM) and all σ(1) receptor ligands studied (3-100 μM) inhibited the KCl-induced increase in [Ca(2+)](i) in a concentration-dependent way. The order of maximum inhibition for the ligands compared here was NE-100>BD-1047=PRE 084>(+)-pentazocine. There were no appreciable differences in their effects between wild-type and σ(1)R-KO mice. These findings indicate that σ(1) receptors are not involved in calcium influx through VDCCs or in the inhibitory effects of these σ(1) ligands on Ca(2+) channels.     

The role of mu- and kappa-opioid receptors in cocaine-induced conditioned place preference.

Effects of buprenorphine, U-50,488H, naltrexone and lithium chloride on cocaine conditioned place preference were examined. Buprenorphine, a mixed opioid agonist-antagonist, blocked the cocaine-induced place preference. Furthermore, the kappa-receptor agonist U-50,488H and the mu-receptor antagonist naltrexone both antagonized the cocaine preference. U-50,488H or naltrexone alone induced a place aversion in a dose-dependent manner. However, the cocaine-induced conditioned place preference was not blocked by lithium chloride, although the latter induced a conditioned place aversion, indicating that the antagonism of cocaine-induced place preference by U-50,488H or naltrexone does not result from a functional antagonism. These results suggest that mu- and kappa-opioid receptors may be involved in cocaine-induced conditioned place preference.     

Ethanol tachyphylaxis in spinal cord motorneurons: role of metabotropic glutamate receptors

1. Ethanol (EtOH) tachyphylaxis (acute tolerance), a time-dependent decrease in apparent potency, is known in vivo and in some neuronal preparations. The present studies characterize EtOH tachyphylaxis in spinal motorneurons and test the hypothesis that metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) play a role. 2. Patch clamp studies were carried out in motorneurons in rat spinal cord slices. Currents were evoked by pulses of glutamate, alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methylisoxazole-4-propionic acid (AMPA) or N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA). 3. In nine of 15 cells, ethanol depression of glutamate-evoked currents was time-dependent. EtOH depressed current area 36.9+/-3% at 8-10 min, but only 16.8+/-3% at 20 min. Mean reduction in depression was 20.1+/-1%, N=9. Tachyphylaxis was less prominent in currents evoked by AMPA or NMDA, appearing in two of 10 AMPA and three of 11 NMDA currents. 4. The mGluR agonist trans-(1S,3R)-1-amino-1,3-cyclopentanedicarboxylic acid (ACPD) increased, the antagonist (+/-)-alpha-methyl-4-carboxyphenylglycine (MCPG) decreased the area of glutamate-evoked currents. ACPD also increased the area of NMDA- and AMPA-evoked currents. 5. ACPD increased the incidence of tachyphylaxis in glutamate-evoked currents to 100% (N=9); MCPG markedly reduced tachyphylaxis. ACPD also increased the incidence of tachyphylaxis in currents evoked by NMDA and AMPA to five of eight and four of seven neurons, respectively. 6. Block of G-protein pathways by intracellular GDP-beta-s abolished tachyphylaxis in glutamate-evoked currents (N=8); however, currents recovered only partially following EtOH washout. 7. Activation of mGluRs contributes to neuronal tachyphylaxis to EtOH in spinal cord motorneurons, probably via G-protein pathways.     

5-HT1A receptors of the lateral septum regulate inhibitory avoidance but not escape behavior in rats

Serotonin in the lateral septum (LS) has been implicated in the modulation of defensive behaviors and in anxiety. However, it is currently unknown whether changes in 5-HT mechanisms in this brain area may selectively affect defensive responses associated with specific subtypes of anxiety disorders recognized in clinical settings. To address this question, we evaluated the effect of the intra-LS injection of the 5-HT(1A/7) receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT (0.6, 3.0, 15.0 nmol) in male Wistar rats exposed to the elevated T-maze animal model of anxiety. This test allows the measurement of two behavioral defensive responses in the same rat: inhibitory avoidance and escape behavior. In clinical terms, these responses have been respectively related to generalized anxiety and panic disorder. The effects of 8-OH-DPAT were compared to those caused by a standard anxiolytic compound, the benzodiazepine receptor agonist midazolam (MDZ, 20 nmol). We also investigated whether the intra-LS injection of the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist WAY-100635 (0.37 nmol) was able to block the effects of 8-OH-DPAT. All animals were also tested in an open field for locomotor activity assessments. Results showed that whereas intra-LS administration of MDZ decreased avoidance latencies, suggesting an anxiolytic action, 8-OH-DPAT caused the opposite effect. Neither drug affected the escape performance. Intra-LS administration of WAY-100635 blocked the anxiogenic effect caused by 8-OH-DPAT. No changes to locomotion were detected in the open field. The data suggests that LS 5-HT(1A) receptors are involved in the control of inhibitory avoidance behavior and that a failure in this regulatory mechanism may be of importance to the physiopathology of generalized anxiety disorder.     

Functional interaction among opioid receptor types: up-regulation of mu- and delta-opioid receptor functions after repeated stimulation of kappa-opioid receptors

It has been widely accepted that repeated administration of kappa-opioid receptor agonists leads to the development of antinociceptive tolerance. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of repeated administration of a selective kappa-opioid receptor agonist (1S-trans)-3,4-dichloro-N-methyl-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexyl]-benzeneacetamide hydrochloride ((-)U-50,488H) on the mu- and delta-opioid receptor agonist-induced antinociception and G-protein activation in mice. The mice were injected either subcutaneously (s.c.) or intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) pretreated with saline or (-)U-50,488H once a day for seven consecutive days. Two hours after the last injection, the mice were challenged by either mu- or delta-opioid receptor agonist for the antinociceptive assay. Repeated treatment with (-)U-50,488H (s.c. or i.c.v.) significantly enhanced antinociceptive effect of both mu-opioid receptor agonist (morphine) and delta-opioid receptor agonists ([d-Ala2]deltorphin (DELT) and (+)-4-[(alphaR)-alpha-((2S,5R)-4-allyl-2,5-dime thyl-1-piperazinyl)-3-methoxybenzyl]-N,N-diethylbenzamide (SNC-80) compared to saline-treated groups. Under these conditions, repeated s.c. injection of (-)U-50,488H significantly enhanced both mu- and delta-opioid receptor agonist-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the membrane of the thalamus. On the contrary, either repeated administration of morphine (s.c. or i.c.v.) or SNC-80 failed to affect the kappa-opioid receptor agonist-induced antinociception and G-protein activation. Taken together, these results suggest that repeated stimulation of kappa-opioid receptor markedly increases the functional mu- and delta-opioid receptors, whereas repeated stimulation of either mu- or delta-opioid receptor had no direct effect on kappa-opioidergic function in mice.     

Inhibition of enkephalin metabolism and activation of mu- or delta-opioid receptors elicit opposite effects on reward and motility in the ventral mesencephalon.

The coexistence of endogenous opioid systems and dopaminergic neurones in the midbrain tegmental area suggests functional interactions between dopamine and enkephalins. Nevertheless, the identification of the specific opioid receptors associated with modulation of tegmental dopamine activity and its behavioural concomitants on motility and reward is far from clear, considering the mixed nature of the ligands usually employed. In this way, kelatorphan, a potent inhibitor of enkephalinases and selective agonists for mu- and delta-opioid receptor subtypes (DAGO and DSTBULET, respectively) were infused directly into the ventral tegmental area of the rat to study the role of endogenous enkephalins and opioid receptors in regulating spontaneous motor activity and intracranial self-stimulation behaviour. A greater increase in the rate of intracranial self-stimulation behaviour was found after activation of mu-opioid receptors in the ventral tegmental area, as compared to activation of delta-opioid receptors, whereas enhancement of endogenous enkephalins by inhibiting their metabolism through kelatorphan, reduced the rate of intracranial self-stimulation behaviour. On the contrary, spontaneous motor activity was reduced by the delta-opioid receptor agonist, whereas kelatorphan increased the movements of the animal. Taken together, these results show that inhibition of the metabolism of enkephalins in the ventral tegmental area decreased positive reinforcement from the lateral hypothalamic medial forebrain bundle and increased spontaneous movements. On the contrary, activation of both mu- or delta-opioid receptors in the ventral tegmental area significantly increased self-stimulation and decreased spontaneous motor activity, supporting the view that different mechanisms underlie the behavioural effects, resulting from enhancement of endogenous enkephalins and from activation of specific opioid receptors in the ventral mesencephalon.