Laparoscopic surgery in situs inversus: a literature review and a report of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis in situs inversus

Background Situs inversus (SI) is a rare autosomal recessive congenital defect in which the position of abdominal and/or thoracic organs is a mirror image of the normal one, in the sagittal plain. In 25% of these cases, SI is part of the Kartagener syndrome, together with bronchiectasis and chronic sinusitis.Methods We present a case of a patient with Kartagener syndrome and complete SI that was laparoscopically operated on for diverticulitis. We also review the published English information available on this rare condition.Results A review of the literature revealed another single case of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy and 27 cases of other laparoscopic interventions in the presence of SI. Those laparoscopic procedures included basic procedures such as explorations and cholecystectomies, as well as advanced procedures such as gastrectomy and gastric bypass.Conclusion The laparoscopic approach is feasible in cases of SI, although technically more complicated because of the different position of the organs and the different laparoscopic view of the anatomy.     

Use and outcomes of emergent laparoscopic resection for acute diverticulitis

BackgroundThe use and outcomes of laparoscopic sigmoid resection during emergency admissions for diverticulitis are unknown.MethodsThe Nationwide Inpatient Sample was queried for colorectal resections performed for diverticulitis during emergent hospital admissions (2003–2007). Univariate and multivariate analyses including patient, hospital, and outcome variables were performed.ResultsA national estimate of 67,645 resections (4% laparoscopic) was evaluated. The rate of conversion to open operation was 55%. Ostomies were created in 66% of patients, 67% open and 41% laparoscopic. Laparoscopy was not a predictor of mortality (odds ratio [OR] =.70; confidence interval [CI], .32–1.53). Laparoscopy predicted routine discharge (OR = 1.31; CI, 1.06–1.63) and a decreased length of stay (absolute days = ?.78; CI, ?1.19 to ?.37). There was no difference in the cost of hospitalization between the 2 groups (P = .45).ConclusionsIn acute diverticulitis, urgent laparoscopic resection decreases the length of stay. However, it is associated with a high conversion rate, no cost savings, and no difference in mortality.     

经阴道腹腔镜下乙状结肠癌根治术的围手术期护理

目的探讨经阴道腹腔镜下乙状结肠癌根治术患者的围手术期护理方法。方法回顾分析首例经会阴腹腔镜下乙状结肠癌根治术患者的临床资料,总结围手术期的护理方法,预防并发症的发生。结果患者术后无切口及肺部感染、无腹腔出血及感染、无阴道分泌物、无吻合口漏及吻合口狭窄、无尿潴留及腹泻等并发症发生。结论结肠癌患者围手术期精心护理对疾病的康复具有重要意义,能预防和降低并发症的发生率,缩短住院时间,提高患者生活质量。     

Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for benign disease

Background  Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) has made its initial forays into clinical minimally invasive surgery. SILS combines in part the cosmetic advantage and decrease parietal trauma of natural orifice surgery, but allow operative realization with standard and validated laparoscopic instruments. We report here the first clinical transumbilical SILS sigmoidectomy for benign disease.
Method  Preliminary experience with transumbilical single incision laparoscopic surgery (or embryonic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery) sigmoidectomy in a female patient (34 years, BMI 22 kg/m²) with sigmoid stenosis caused by nodular endometriosis was reported. Transumbilical SILS treatment of pelvic endometriosis was performed during the same operation through cauterization.
Results  Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy was feasible with conventional laparoscopic instruments. The combined uses of straight and articulated laparoscopic instruments allow the avoidance of transparietal sling suture for exposition. Operative time for sigmoidectomy and endometriosis therapy was 125 min. No intra-operative or postoperative complications were recorded. SILS achieved excellent cosmetic results and may be associated with accelerated recovery.
Conclusion  Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is feasible by experienced laparoscopic surgeons using conventional laparoscopic instruments and staplers. The combined uses of strait and articulated instruments allow transumbilical SILS sigmoidectomy without the need for additional incision or transparietal sling suture. SILS sigmoidectomy may have the clinical advantage over NOTES of offering the safety of laparoscopic colectomy and the avoidance of vaginal access. It has to be determined if SILS offers benefit to the patient, except in cosmesis, compared with standard laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.     

Two-stage laparoscopic management of complicated acute diverticulitis. Initial experience

Today no secure consensus exists about the best treatment of complicated diverticulitis. The classic surgical procedures are associated to a high immediate and delayed morbidity. In the last few years several more conservative techniques have been suggested to allow a later elective resection. Laparoscopic exploration, peritoneal lavage, and drain of the abdominal cavity followed by an elective sigmoid laparoscopic resection is a new minimal invasive approach. This approach has been applied in our unit to treat four patients. All patients had an acute abdomen due to complicated diverticulitis and one patient had evidence of free air at the abdomen x-ray. At emergent operation pus was cleaned, a peritoneal lavage was carried out, a drain was placed near the colonic lesion and another one in the pelvis. Patients fully recovered without complication and 2 to 28 weeks after first operation an elective laparoscopic resection of descending and sigmoid colon with a Knight-Griffen colorectal anastomosis was performed. Neither residual abscess nor dense adhesions were found at the second operations. There were no complications and median hospital stay after the second operation was 10 days (range, 8-13 days). Laparoscopic treatment of generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis is an attractive alternative to the traditional management of this disease. Our initial results are comparable to that published in the literature. This approach can be safe and effective in selected cases of complicated acute diverticulitis.     

Factors and consequences of conversion in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease

BACKGROUND: The disadvantages of laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease include the risk of conversion to open operation and longer operative time. The aim of this study was to analyse the causes and consequences of conversion in 168 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopically assisted colectomy between January 1994 and June 2001. METHODS: Data were collected prospectively to analyse the causes and consequences of conversion to open surgery in terms of postoperative morbidity and patient recovery. RESULTS: Postoperative mortality, morbidity, conversion and reoperation rates were zero, 21.4 per cent (n = 36), 14.3 per cent (n = 24) and 3.0 per cent (n = 5) respectively. The reasons for conversion were presence of intraperitoneal adhesions and/or inflammatory pseudotumour (n = 21), an intraoperative diagnosis of sigmoid cancer (n = 1), hypercapnia (n = 1) and abdominal bleeding (n = 1). Three preoperative factors were associated with a significant higher risk of conversion: surgical expertise, the presence of sigmoid stenosis or fistula, and the severity of diverticulitis on pathological examination. Morbidity was no different between laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (30 of 144; 20.8 per cent) and converted procedures (six of 24; 25.0 per cent). Open conversion was associated with a longer operative time and significantly delayed patient recovery and hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: Surgical experience and severe diverticular disease are predictive factors for conversion in laparoscopic elective sigmoidectomy. Even if necessary, conversion does not increase the morbidity rate.     

Elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis

BACKGROUND: We undertook a prospective evaluation of elective laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis in order to assess the risks and benefits of this approach. METHODS: Between November 1992 and November 1996, 54 consecutive patients were included in this study. Their mean age was 59 +/- 13 years (range, 36-81). The number of attacks of diverticulitis before colectomy ranged from one to four (mean, 2.2 +/- 0.7). The operative technique consisted of elective division of the inferior mesenteric vessels, left colonic flexure mobilization, and colorectal anastomosis using the cross-stapling technique. RESULTS: Five procedures (9.2%) were converted. The primary cause for conversion was obesity. These patients had a simple postoperative course. There were no postoperative deaths. Three patients (6.1%) developed abdominal complications, and four patients (8.2%) had abdominal wall complications. Postoperative paralytic ileus lasted only 2.3 +/- 0.7 days (range, 1-6), allowing for a rapid reintroduction of regular diet. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 6.4 +/- 2.7 days (range, 4-15). CONCLUSIONS: Elective laparoscopic colectomy for diverticulitis is feasible in most cases. In most cases, the operative risk is low and the postoperative course is uneventful. Elective sigmoid laparoscopic colectomy should be considered a good therapeutic option for symptomatic diverticulitis.     

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery for recurrent diverticulitis: experience in consecutive cases and a review of the literature

Background  

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has recently gained enthusiasm for application in colorectal surgery. We present the safety and feasibility of using the da Vinci^? robotic system for the surgical treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis.     

Simultaneous laparoscopic radical nephrectomy and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for synchronous renal cell carcinoma and colonic adenocarcinoma

Hand-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy is an established therapeutic choice for localized renal cell carcinoma. Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is becoming accepted for the treatment of locally advanced sigmoid colon cancer. Primary cancer may occur synchronously in two different organs, in which case simultaneous resection is recommended if possible. To our knowledge this is the first report of simultaneous laparoscopic resection of coexistent renal and colonic double primary malignant tumors.     

Elective laparoscopic management of sigmoid diverticulitis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of elective laparoscopic treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. METHODS: Between November 1991 and February 1998, 110 patients were treated by elective laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis. The main data recorded were postoperation pain, return of bowel function, operation time, duration of hospital stay, and early and late complications. RESULTS: Mean age of patients was 63 years (range, 36-83 years). Nine patients (8.2%) required conversion to laparotomy because of severe adhesions, inflammatory process, or obesity. The mean operation time was 167 min. Return of bowel function was 2.3 days. Mean postoperation stay was 8.2 days. There was no perioperation death, and the morbidity rate was 7.3%, with two complications related to the laparoscopic approach (1 trocar site bowel incarceration and 1 small bowel fistula). Of the patients with complications, four (3.6%) needed reoperation. During the follow-up (6-79 months), no incisional hernia was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis is feasible and safe in more than 90% of cases. Benefits of the laparoscopic approach are the improved early postoperation course and the reduction of parietal sequelae.     

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery: a promising approach to sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease

Background

Laparoscopic sigmoidectomy has become the standard procedure in elective surgery for recurrent diverticular disease. To realize further benefits of this minimal invasive procedure and to offer less postoperative pain, shorter recovery time, reduced complications, and improved cosmetic results, attempts are being made to minimize the number of necessary skin incisions for trocar positioning. One method is to use only one port for laparoscopic access to perform diverticular-related elective sigmoidectomies.

Methods

Between 7 July and 4 August 2009, 10 consecutive patients were referred for partial left colon resection due to multiple episodes of diverticulitis. In all cases, access to the abdomen was achieved through a 2- to 2.5-cm single incision via the umbilicus followed by insertion of the single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS?) port system. Outcomes such as change in the procedural method, operative time, postoperative complications, and length of stay were recorded.

Results

Of the 10 consecutive sigmoidectomies, 9 were performed successfully with the SILS? procedure using only one incision in the umbilicus. No mortalities or major complications were noted. The median operating time was 120 min, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 7 days.

Conclusion

As an alternative to the standard laparoscopic procedure, single-incision laparoscopic sigmoidectomy via the umbilicus is technically feasible and effective. This attractive procedure aims to increase the patient’s comfort further after abdominal surgery.     

Critical appraisal of laparoscopic lavage for Hinchey III diverticulitis

Laparoscopic lavage and drainage is a novel approach for managing patients with Hinchey III diverticulitis. However, this less invasive technique has important limitations, which are highlighted in this systematic review. We performed a PubMed search and identified 6 individual series reporting the results of this procedure. An analysis was performed regarding treatment-related morbidity, success rates, and subsequent elective sigmoid resection. Data was available for 287 patients only, of which 213 (74%) were actually presenting with Hinchey III diverticulitis. Reported success rate in this group was 94%, with 3% mortality. Causes of failure were: (1) ongoing sepsis; (2) fecal fistula formation; and (3) perforated sigmoid cancer. Although few patients developed recurrent diverticulitis in follow-up, 106 patients (37%) eventually underwent elective sigmoid resection. Our data indicate that laparoscopic lavage and drainage may benefit a highly selected group of Hinchey III patients. It is unclear whether laparoscopic lavage and drainage should be considered a curative procedure or just a damage control operation. Failure to identify patients with either: (1) feculent peritonitis (Hinchey IV); (2) persistent perforation; or (3) perforated sigmoid cancer, are causes of concern, and will limit the application of this technique.     

Emergency surgery for complicated acute diverticulitis

Aim  Antecedent attacks of diverticulitis are thought to increase the risk of complicated diverticulitis, and unless elective surgery is performed, a high proportion of patients with recurrent symptoms will require emergency operations for complicated diverticulitis with its associated morbidity. In this multicentre study, we aim to assess impact of previous attacks of diverticulitis on patients requiring an emergency surgical intervention.
Method  All patients operated on as an emergency for complicated diverticulitis were retrospectively analysed. Patients were separated into two groups: group A included patients without previous history of diverticular disease, and group B those with previous attacks of diverticulitis.
Results  A total of 96 patients were included in the study. Group A included 68 (70.8%) patients, and group B 28 (29.2%) patients. Generalized peritonitis was the reason for operation in 50 (73.5%) patients in-group A and only four (14%) patients in group B. Perforated diverticulitis occurred more often in group A, whereas pericolonic abscess and phlegmon formation occurred more commonly in group B. Resection was performed in all patients in group B; 50% had a Hartmann's procedure, and the other 50% patients had primary anastomosis. Hartmann's procedure was performed in 52 patients (76.5%) in group A, and 8 patients (11.7%) had resection and primary anastomosis. No difference in postoperative complications was identified between the groups.
Conclusion  Multiple attacks of diverticulitis are not associated with an increased risk of complicated diverticulitis. Recurrent episodes of diverticulitis are not associated with a less favourable outcome or an increased risk of fatality if complications ensue.