Diagnostic Value of 64-Slice Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: Comparison with Invasive Coronary Angiography

Objective

We wanted to evaluate the image quality and diagnostic value of 64-slice dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) coronary angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation (Afib).

Materials and Methods

The coronary arteries of 22 Afib patients seen on DSCT were classified into 15 segments and the imaging quality (excellent, good, moderate and poor) and significant stenoses (≥ 50%) were evaluated by two radiologists who were blinded to the conventional coronary angiography (CAG) results. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting important coronary artery stenosis were calculated. McNemar test was used to determine any significant difference between DSCT and CAG, and Cohen''s Kappa statistics were calculated for the intermodality and interobserver agreement.

Results

The mean heart rate was 89 ± 8.3 bpm (range: 80-118 bpm). A range from 250 msec to 300 msec within the RR interval was the optimal reconstruction interval for the patients with Afib. The respective overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values were 74%, 97%, 81% and 96% for reader 1 and 72%, 98%, 85% and 96% for reader 2. No significant difference between DSCT and CAG was found for detecting a significant stenosis (reader 1, p = 1.0; reader 2, p = 0.727). Cohen''s Kappa statistics demonstrated good intermodality and interobserver agreement.

Conclusion

64-slice DSCT coronary angiography provides good image quality in patients with atrial fibrillation without the need for controlling the heart rate. DSCT can be used for ruling out significant stenosis in patients with atrial fibrillation with its high NPV for detecting in important stenosis.     

Effect of Heart Rate and Body Mass Index on the Interscan and Interobserver Variability of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring at Prospective ECG-Triggered 64-Slice CT

Objective

To test the effects of heart rate, body mass index (BMI) and noise level on interscan and interobserver variability of coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring on a prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggered 64-slice CT.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and ten patients (76 patients with CAC) were scanned twice on prospective ECG-triggered scans. The scan parameters included 120 kV, 82 mAs, a 2.5 mm thickness, and an acquisition center at 45% of the RR interval. The interscan and interobserver variability on the CAC scores (Agatston, volume, and mass) was calculated. The factors affecting the variability were determined by plotting it against heart rate, BMI, and noise level (defined as the standard deviation: SD).

Results

The estimated effective dose was 1.5 ± 0.2 mSv. The mean heart rate was 63 ± 12 bpm (range, 44-101 bpm). The patient BMIs were 24.5 ± 4.5 kg/m² (range, 15.5-42.3 kg/m²). The mean and median interscan variabilities were 11% and 6%, respectively by volume, and 11% and 6%, respectively, by mass. Moreover, the mean and median of the algorithms were lower than the Agatston algorithm (16% and 9%, respectively). The mean and median interobserver variability was 10% and 4%, respectively (average of algorithms). The mean noise levels were 15 ± 4 Hounsfield unit (HU) (range, 8-25 HU). The interscan and interobserver variability was not correlated with heart rate, BMI, or noise level.

Conclusion

The interscan and interobserver variability of CAC on a prospective ECG-triggered 64-slice CT with high image quality and 45% of RR acquisition is not significantly affected by heart rate, BMI, or noise level. The volume or mass algorithms show reduced interscan variability compared to the Agatston scoring (p < 0.05).     

The Diagnostic Accuracy, Image Quality and Radiation Dose of 64-Slice Dual-Source CT in Daily Practice: a Single Institution's Experience

Objective

We wanted to evaluate the image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure of 64-slice dual-source CT (DSCT) coronary angiography according to the heart rate in symptomatic patients during daily clinical practice.

Materials and Methods

We performed a retrospective search for the DSCT coronary angiography reports of 729 consecutive symptomatic patients. For the 131 patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography, the image quality, the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value [PPV] and negative predictive value [NPV] for detecting significant stenosis ≥ 50% diameter) and the radiation exposure were evaluated. These values were compared between the groups with differing heart rates (HR): mean HR < 65 or ≥ 65 and HR variability (HRV) < 15 or ≥ 15.

Results

Among the 729 patients, the CT reports showed no stenosis or insignificant coronary artery stenosis in 72%, significant stenosis in 26% and non-diagnostic in 2%. For the 131 patients who underwent invasive coronary angiography, 95% of the patients and 97% of the segments were evaluable, and the overall per-patient/per-segment sensitivity, the perpatient/per-segment specificity, the per-patient/per-segment PPV and the per-patient/per-segment NPV were 100%/90%, 71%/98%, 95%/88% and 100%/97%, respectively. The image quality was better in the HR < 65 group than in the HR ≥ 65 group (p = 0.001), but there was no difference in diagnostic performance between the two groups. The mean effective radiation doses were lower in the HR < 65 or HRV < 15 group (p < 0.0001): 5.5 versus 6.7 mSv for the mean HR groups and 5.3 versus 9.3 mSv for the HRV groups.

Conclusion

Dual-source CT coronary angiography is a highly accurate modality in the clinical setting. Better image quality and a significant radiation reduction are being rendered in the lower HR group.     

Myocardial Bridging of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery: Depiction Rate and Morphologic Features by Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography

Objective

To evaluate the depiction rate and morphologic features of myocardial bridging (MB) of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) using dual-source CT (DSCT).

Materials and Methods

CT scans from a total of 1,353 patients who underwent DSCT were reviewed retrospectively for LAD-MB. Seventy-eight patients were excluded due to poor image quality or poor enhancement of the coronary artery. The length and depth of the MB were analyzed and classified as superficial or deep with respect to the depth (≤ 1 or > 1 mm) of the LAD tunneled segment. Superficial MB was subdivided into complete or incomplete types according to full or partial encasement of the myocardium.

Results

Of the 1,275 patients included in this study, 557 cases of MB were found from 536 patients (42%). Superficial MB was observed in 368 of 557 (66%) cases, and deep MB was seen in 189 of 557 (34%) cases. Superficial MB showed 2 types: complete (128 of 368, 35%) and incomplete (240 of 368, 65%). The mean length of a tunneled segment for superficial MB was 16.4 ± 8.6 mm. The mean length and depth of a tunneled segment for deep MB were 27.6 ± 12.8 mm and 3.0 ± 1.4 mm, respectively. The incidence of atherosclerotic plaques in a 2-cm-long segment proximal to MB was 16%.

Conclusion

The depiction rate of LAD-MB using DSCT in a large series of patients was 42%, with two-thirds of MB segments being the superficial type.     

Coronary computed tomography angiography using 128-slice dual-source computed tomography in patients with severe calcification

Purpose

To compare coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) and coronary angiography (CAG) with regard to luminal graphic definition of calcified segments using 128-slice dual-source computed tomography (DSCT), specifically for patients with an Agatston score >400.

Materials and methods

Of 1148 consecutive patients who underwent coronary CTA using a 128-slice DSCT, 132 subjects had severe calcification with an Agatston score >400. Thirty-nine of the 132 patients who had undergone CAG within 3 months before or after coronary CTA were included. We investigated the distribution of calcification, and we visually evaluated significant stenosis in the calcified and all segments. Results were compared with CAG.

Results

The target group in this study had a very high mean Agatston score of 1771 ± 1724. Results for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 247 calcified vs all 325 segments were as follows: sensitivity 93.2 vs 92.2%, specificity 83.9 vs 87.5%, PPV 70.8 vs 69.6%, and NPV 96.7 vs 97.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

128-slice DSCT has potential for evaluation of calcified segments in the lumen, even in patients whose Agatston score exceeds 400.

     

Prospectively Electrocardiogram-Gated High-Pitch Spiral Acquisition Mode Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography in Patients with High Heart Rates: Comparison with Retrospective Electrocardiogram-Gated Spiral Acquisition Mode

Objective

To assess the image quality and effective radiation dose of prospectively electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated high-pitch spiral acquisition mode (flash mode) of dual-source CT (DSCT) coronary angiography (CTCA) in patients with high heart rates (HRs) as compared with retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode.

Materials and Methods

Two hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients (132 female, mean age: 55 ± 11 years) with mean HR > 65 beats per minute (bpm) were prospectively included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups. Collection was performed in group A CTCA using flash mode setting at 20-30% of the R-R interval, and retrospectively ECG-gated spiral acquisition mode in group B. The image noise, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), image quality scores, effective radiation dose and influencing factors on image quality between the two groups were assessed.

Results

There were no significant differences in image quality scores and proportions of non-diagnostic coronary artery segments between two groups (image quality scores: 1.064 ± 0.306 [group A] vs. 1.084 ± 0.327 [group B], p = 0.063; proportion of non-diagnostic coronary artery segments: segment-based analysis 1.52% (group A) vs. 1.74% (group B), p = 0.345; patient-based analysis 7.5% (group A) vs. 6.7% (group B), p = 0.812). The estimated radiation dose was 1.0 ± 0.16 mSv in group A and 7.1 ± 1.05 mSv in group B (p = 0.001).

Conclusion

In conclusion, in patients with HRs > 65 bpm without cardiac arrhythmia, the prospectively high-pitch spiral-acquisition mode with image-acquired timing set at 20-30% of the R-R interval provides a similar image quality and low rate of non-diagnostic coronary segments to the retrospectively ECG-gated low-pitch spiral acquisition mode, with significant reduction of radiation exposure.     

Evaluation of CT coronary artery angiography with 320-row detector CT in a high-risk population

Objectives

The aim of this article was to prospectively evaluate the accuracy and radiation dose of 320-detector row dynamic volume CT (DVCT) for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a high-risk population.

Methods

60 patients with a high risk of CAD underwent DVCT without preceding heart rate control and also underwent invasive coronary angiography (ICA), which served as the standard reference.

Results

On a per segment analysis, overall sensitivity was 95.3%, specificity was 97.6%, positive predictive value was 90.6%, negative predictive value was 98.8% and Youden index was 0.93. In both heart rate subgroups, diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis was similar. The accuracy of the subgroup with an Agatston score ≥100 was lower than that for patients with an Agatston score <100. However, the difference between DVCT and ICA results was not significant (p=0.08). The mean estimated effective dose of CT was 12.5±9.4 mSv. In those patients with heart rates less than 70 beats per minute (bpm), the mean radiation exposure of DVCT was 5.2±0.9 mSv. The effective radiation dose was significantly lower than that of ICA (14.1±5.9 mSv) (p<0.001). When the heart rate was >70 bpm, a significantly higher dose was delivered to patients with DVCT (22.6±5.2 mSv, p<0.001) than with ICA (15.0±5.3 mSv, p<0.001).

Conclusion

DVCT reliably provides high diagnostic accuracy without heart rate/rhythm control. However, from a dosimetric point of view, it is recommended that heart rate should be controlled to <70 bpm to decrease radiation dose.The small diameter of the coronary segments, their complex three-dimensional geometry and their rapid movement throughout the cardiac cycle represent the major challenges for artefact-free coronary CT angiography (CTA). With each scanner generation, motion artefacts re-appear as a major cause of image quality degradation during coronary CTA [1-10]. Coronary CTA studies of each coronary artery with four-multidetector CT (MDCT) at a gantry rotation time of 500 ms had significantly decreased image quality with increasing mean heart rates [3]. Using 16-MDCT at a gantry rotation time of 420 ms, Hoffmann et al [2] found a significant negative correlation between overall image quality and mean heart rate. Even using 64-section CT, with its gantry rotation speed of 330 ms, elevated and irregular heart beats were found to cause relevant degradation of image quality [1,4,9,11]. Using dual-source CT (DSCT) with an increased temporal resolution of 83 ms, there was no significant correlation between mean heart rate and the overall image quality for any coronary segment or for any individual coronary artery. Nonetheless, irregular heart rates still slightly affect the image quality of non-invasive coronary angiography, even with DSCT [10,12].The 320-detector row dynamic volume CT (DVCT) is characterised by 320 slice detectors with a thickness of 0.5 mm and gantry rotation time of 350 ms. With a wide coverage of 16 cm in the z-axis, the whole heart can be covered within one cardiac cycle. Theoretically, DVCT makes it possible to scan patients with an irregular heart rate without “stair-step” artefacts. At the same time, DVCT avoids the overlapping rotations of helical CT, and the application of prospective echocardiogram (ECG) gating has become more feasible. Recent studies of DVCT have mainly been based on a low heart rate [13-17]. Few studies have investigated the diagnostic accuracy in higher heart rates and arrhythmia. Our purpose was to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and exposure dose of DVCT in a high-risk population with high and irregular heart rates.     

320层容积CT无心率(律)控制的冠状动脉血管成像在冠心病高危人群中的初步应用

目的 探讨在无心率(律)控制条件下,320层容积CT冠状动脉血管成像(VCTA)诊断冠心病高危人群冠状动脉狭窄的准确性.方法 对30例有冠心病高危因素的患者,以冠状动脉导管造影(ICA)为金标准,评价VCTA诊断冠状动脉节段狭窄率≥50%的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)及Youden指数;同时采用卡方检验分析心率快慢及钙化程度对2种检查方法诊断一致率的影响.结果 30例患者平均心率(73.7±15.4)次/min(bpm),420个可分析节段的平均Agatston钙化积分中位数为45.6分(OR=181).心率＜70和≥70 bpm分别显示242和169段,诊断一致率差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);Agatston钙化积分≥100分的图像质量和诊断一致率低于Agatston钙化积分＜100分的节段,但VCTA与ICA结果仍具有良好吻合性(P＞0.05).结论 在无心率(律)控制情况下,VCTA对冠心病高危人群的冠状动脉狭窄诊断具有很高的准确性.     

Coronary CT angiography with dual source computed tomography in 170 patients

Introduction

In preliminary studies DSCT provides robust image quality over a wide range of heart rates and excludes CAD with high accuracy.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the reproducibility of these results in a large, unselected and consecutive group of patients scheduled for invasive coronary angiography (ICA).

Material and methods

170 patients (124 men, 46 women; mean age: 64 ± 9 years) with known CAD (101 patients) or suspected CAD (69 patients) scheduled for ICA were examined by coronary CTA prior to ICA. All coronary segments were assessed for image quality (1: excellent; 5: non-diagnostic). The presence of significant vessel stenosis (>50%) was calculated using ICA as standard of reference.

Results

A total of 680 vessels were analyzed. Despite of 45 arrythmic patients all analyzed coronary segments were diagnostically evaluable. Mean Agatston score equivalent was 686 (range 0-4950). ICA revealed 364 lesions with ≥50% diameter stenosis. DSCT correctly identified 336 of these lesions. 115 lesions with a diameter stenosis ≤50% were overestimated by DSCT and thus considered as false-positive findings. On a per-segment basis, sensitivity was 92%, specificity 93%, positive predictive value (PPV) was 75% and negative predictive value (NPV) 98%. On a per-vessel basis DSCT revealed a sensitivity of 93%, a specificity of 88%, a PPV of 78% and a NPV of 97%. On a per-patient basis sensitivity was 94%, specificity 79%, PPV 88% and NPV 90%.

Conclusions

Initial results of preliminary studies showing robust image quality and high accuracy in DSCT cardiac imaging could be approved with the present study enclosing a large consecutive population. However severe coronary calcifications and irregular heart rate still remain limiting factors for coronary CTA.Despite improved image quality and high accuracy of coronary DSCT angiography, proof of indication is necessary, due to still remaining limiting factors.     

Coronary Artery Disease in Asymptomatic Young Adults: Its Prevalence According to Coronary Artery Disease Risk Stratification and the CT Characteristics

Objective

We aimed at evaluating the prevalence and CT characteristics of occult coronary artery disease (CAD) in young Korean adults under 40 years of age by performing coronary CT angiography (CCTA).

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 112 consecutive asymptomatic subjects (90 men, mean age: 35.6 ± 3.7 years) who underwent CCTA as part of a general health evaluation. We classified the subjects into three National Cholesterol Education Program risk categories and we assessed the plaque characteristics on CCTA according to the number of involved vessels, the location and type of plaques and vascular remodeling.

Results

Twelve individuals had CAD (11%, 11 men). The prevalence of CAD was significantly higher in the subgroups with moderate (22%) or high (25%) risk than that in the low risk subgroup (5%) (p < 0.05). Nine patients had single-vessel disease and three patients had two-vessel disease. The most common location for plaque was the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery (60%). All the patients had non-significant stenosis and plaque, including the non-calcified (27%), mixed (47%) and calcified (27%) types. Positive vascular remodeling was identified in all the patients with non-calcified or mixed plaques.

Conclusion

The prevalence of occult CAD was not negligible in the asymptomatic young adults with moderate to high risk, and this suggests the importance of management and risk factor modification in this population. All the patients had non-significant stenosis, and one fourth of the plaques did not show calcification.     

Comparison of dual-source and electron-beam CT for the assessment of coronary artery calcium scoring

Objective

Cardiac CT allows the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification (CAC). Electron-beam CT (EBCT) has been widely replaced by high-end CT generations in the assessment of CAC. The aim of this study was to compare the CAC scores derived from an EBCT with those from a dual-source CT (DSCT).

Methods

We retrospectively selected 92 patients (61 males; mean age, 60.7±12 years) from our database, who underwent both EBCT and DSCT. CAC was assessed using the Agatston score by two independent readers (replicates: 1, 2; 3=mean of reading 1 and 2).

Results

EBCT scores were on average slightly higher than DSCT scores (281±569 vs 241±502; p<0.05). In regression analysis R²-values vary from 0.956 (1) to 0.966 (3). We calculated a correction factor as EBCT=(DSCT+1)^1.026–1. When stratifying into CAC categories (0, 1–99, 100–399, 400–999 and ≥1000), 79 (86%) were correctly classified. From those with positive CAC scores, 7 out of 61 cases (11%, κ=0.81) were classified in different categories. Using the corrected DSCT CAC score, linear regression analysis for the comparison to the EBCT results were r=0.971 (p<0.001), with a mean difference of 6.4±147.8. Five subjects (5.4%) were still classified in different categories (κ=0.84).

Conclusion

CAC obtained from DSCT is highly correlated with the EBCT measures. Using the calculated correction factor, agreement only marginally improved the clinical interpretation of results. Overall, for clinical purposes, face value use of DSCT-derived values appears as useful as EBCT for CAC scoring.Cardiac CT allows the detection and quantification of coronary artery calcification (CAC) and may thus add important in vivo information on the path from risk factor exposure to formation of clinical events [1-4]. Because of its advantages of being a fast technique with limited radiation exposure to the patients, various published clinical outcome data from CAC are based on electron-beam CT (EBCT), and therefore cut-points have been established for EBCT scans. However, since the appearance of newer generations of CT scanners such as dual-source CT (DSCT), scanners of this type are also widely used for CAC scoring as an alternative to EBCT. The spatial resolution of DSCT scanners is much higher, enabling the detection of smaller lesions, and DSCT is more applicable to other radiological procedures such as CT angiography [5]. CAC scoring is performed on these newer scanner generations using the Agatston score algorithm as the standard measure of CAC quantification. There is direct comparison of CAC scores between newer scanners and EBCT [6-9]. However, comparison between EBCT and DSCT is rare [10]. This is of interest for first-time CAC scoring in asymptomatic subjects, and especially for evaluation of disease progression in subjects with prior EBCT testing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of DSCT in the detection of CAC scores to EBCT. In addition, we compared techniques with each other, verifying the ability of CAC score classification.     

The Influence of Reconstruction Algorithm and Heart Rate on Coronary Artery Image Quality and Stenosis Detection at 64-Detector Cardiac CT

Objective

We wanted to evaluate the impact of two reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) on the image quality and the accuracy of measuring the severity of coronary stenoses by using a pulsating cardiac phantom with different heart rates (HRs).

Materials and Methods

Simulated coronary arteries with different stenotic severities (25, 50, 75%) and different luminal diameters (3, 4, 5 mm) were scanned with a fixed pitch of 0.16 and a 0.35 second gantry rotation time on a 64-slice multidetector CT. Both reconstruction algorithms (halfscan and multisector) were applied to HRs of 40-120 beats per minute (bpm) at 10 bpm intervals. Three experienced radiologists visually assessed the image quality and they manually measured the stenotic severity.

Results

Fewer measurement errors occurred with multisector reconstruction (p = 0.05), a slower HR (p < 0.001) and a larger luminal diameter (p = 0.014); measurement errors were not related with the observers or the stenotic severity. There was no significant difference in measurements as for the reconstruction algorithms below an HR of 70 bpm. More nonassessable segments were visualized with halfscan reconstruction (p = 0.004) and higher HRs (p < 0.001). Halfscan reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was below 60 bpm, while multisector reconstruction had better quality scores when the HR was above 90 bpm. For the HRs between 60 and 90 bpm, both reconstruction modes had similar quality scores. With excluding the nonassessable segments, both reconstruction algorithms achieved a similar mean measured stenotic severity and similar standard deviations.

Conclusion

At a higher HR (above 90 bpm), multisector reconstruction had better temporal resolution, fewer nonassessable segments, better quality scores and better accuracy of measuring the stenotic severity in this phantom study.     

High-Definition Computed Tomography for Coronary Artery Stent Imaging: a Phantom Study

Objective

To assess the performance of a high-definition CT (HDCT) for imaging small caliber coronary stents (≤ 3 mm) by comparing different scan modes of a conventional 64-row standard-definition CT (SDCT).

Materials and Methods

A cardiac phantom with twelve stents (2.5 mm and 3.0 mm in diameter) was scanned by HDCT and SDCT. The scan modes were retrospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gated helical and prospective ECG-triggered axial with tube voltages of 120 kVp and 100 kVp, respectively. The inner stent diameters (ISD) and the in-stent attenuation value (AV_in-stent) and the in-vessel extra-stent attenuation value (AV_in-vessel) were measured by two observers. The artificial lumen narrowing (ALN = [ISD - ISD_measured]/ISD) and artificial attenuation increase between in-stent and in-vessel (AAI = AV_in-stent - AV_in-vessel) were calculated. All data was analyzed by intraclass correlation and ANOVA-test.

Results

The correlation coefficient of ISD, AV_in-vessel and AV_in-stent between the two observers was good. The ALNs of HDCT were statistically lower than that of SDCT (30 ± 5.7% versus 35 ± 5.4%, p < 0.05). HDCT had statistically lower AAI values than SDCT (15.7 ± 81.4 HU versus 71.4 ± 90.5 HU, p < 0.05). The prospective axial dataset demonstrated smaller ALN than the retrospective helical dataset on both HDCT and SDCT (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were no differences in ALN between the 120 kVp and 100 kVp tube voltages on HDCT (p = 0.05).

Conclusion

High-definition CT helps improve measurement accuracy for imaging coronary stents compared to SDCT. HDCT with 100 kVp and the prospective ECG-triggered axial technique, with a lower radiation dose than 120 kVp application, may be advantageous in evaluating coronary stents with smaller calibers (≤ 3 mm).     

Coronary Vasospastic Angina: Assessment by Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography

Objective

We aimed to describe the imaging findings of multidetector CT coronary angiography (MDCTA) in cases of vasospastic angina (VA) and to determine the accuracy of MDCTA in the identification of VA as compared with invasive coronary angiography with an ergonovine provocation test (CAG with an EG test).

Materials and Methods

Fifty-three patients with clinically suspected VA were enrolled in this study. Two radiologists analyzed the stenosis degree, presence or absence of plaque, plaque composition, and a remodeling index of the related-segment in CAG with an EG test, which were used as a gold standard. We evaluated the diagnostic performances of MDCTA by comparing the MDCTA findings with those of CAG with an EG test.

Results

Among the 25 patients with positive CAG with an EG test, all 12 patients with significant stenosis showed no definite plaque with the negative arterial remodeling. Of the six patients with insignificant stenosis, three (50%) had non-calcified plaque (NCP), two (33%) had mixed plaque, and one (17%) had calcified plaque. When the criteria for significant stenosis with negative remodeling but no definite evidence of plaque as a characteristic finding of MDCTA were used, results showed sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of 48%, 100%, 100%, and 68%, respectively.

Conclusion

Significant stenosis with negative remodeling, but no definite evidence of plaque, is the characteristic finding on MDCTA of VA. Cardiac MDCTA shows good diagnostic performance with high specificity and PPV as compared with CAG with an EG test.     

Coronary artery fistula in adults: evaluation with dual-source CT coronary angiography

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical value of dual-source CT (DSCT) coronary angiography in the diagnosis of coronary artery fistula (CAF) in adults.

Methods:

A large cohort of 17,548 patients, who underwent DSCT coronary angiography in our hospital between January 2008 and October 2013, were retrospectively reviewed for CAF. The origin, course and drainage site of CAF and coexisting abnormalities were analysed. The conventional angiography results, treatments and follow-up DSCT images were also evaluated.

Results:

A total of 33 CAFs from 17,548 patients were detected. The incidence of CAF was 0.19% by DSCT. CAF originating from the left coronary artery (LCA) was found in 14 (42.4%) patients, from right coronary artery (RCA) in 4 (12.1%) cases and from both LCA and RCA in 15 (45.5%) patients. The pulmonary artery was the most common site of drainage (28/33, 84.8%). 8 of the 33 (24.2%) cases were associated with aneurysms. Six cases were associated with coronary artery atherosclerosis. Four patients underwent conventional angiography.

Conclusion:

Coronary–pulmonary artery fistula in adults was found more often than in previous studies. CAF commonly originates from LCA or both LCA and RCA in adults. DSCT is a robust tool for investigating the origin, course and drainage site of CAF and coexistent abnormalities.

Advances in knowledge:

A large adult patient cohort who underwent DSCT angiography was reviewed to assess CAFs. Coronary–pulmonary artery fistula in adults was found more often than in previous studies. CAF was observed to originate from the LCA or both coronary arteries in adults. DSCT could clearly depict the fistula origin, course, drainage site and coexisting abnormalities. Conventional angiography results, treatments and follow-up DSCT images were analysed.Coronary artery fistulas (CAFs) are anomalous connections of the coronary arteries. The phenomenon was first described in 1865 by Krause.¹ CAF is considered as a major coronary anomaly by Ogden''s classification.² Most CAFs are congenital. CAFs have an estimated prevalence of 0.002% in the general population; however, they are present in 0.05–0.25% of patients who undergo coronary angiography.^3–5 The traditional diagnosis tool for CAFs is conventional angiography. With the advent of 64-slice multidetector CT in chest and cardiac imaging, the number of incidentally found CAFs has been increasing. The advanced electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated technique of dual-source CT (DSCT) could provide high diagnostic accuracy for the assessment of coronary artery disease.According to prior studies, CAF arises from the right coronary artery (RCA) in approximately 50% of patients.^6–8 In particular, 70% of the CAFs in children (mean age, 2.9 years) originated from the RCA.⁹ In this study, we focused on adult patients. A large cohort of adult patients who underwent DSCT angiography was reviewed to assess CAFs. The CAFs and coexisting abnormalities were analysed.     

双源CT前瞻性心电门控序列扫描冠状动脉成像准确性的多中心研究

目的 与常规冠状动脉造影(CCA)对照,研究双源CT(DSCT)前瞻性心电门控序列扫描冠状动脉成像(SAS-CTCA)对冠状动脉狭窄诊断的准确性.方法 前瞻性的多中心研究,46例可疑冠心病患者[平均年龄(58±9)岁,体质量指数(BMI)(25±3)kg/m2]均进行了SAS-CTCA检查,并于14 d以内完成CCA检查.患者纳入标准:(1)心率控制在65次/min(bpm)以下;(2)窦性心律,心律规整,心率波动范围在6 bpm以内;(3)呼吸配合良好,屏气时间可达到12～15s.排除标准:(1)碘对比剂过敏、肝肾功能不全(血肌酐120 μmol/L)、心功能不全及严重心律不齐患者;(2)冠状动脉支架置入或冠状动脉搭桥患者;(3)心率快,而不能服用美托洛尔控制心率者;(4)不能服用硝酸甘油者;(5)体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)30 ks/m2 ;(6)其他心脏疾患:如心肌病、瓣膜病等.2名评价者分析SAS-CTCA及CCA的结果,计算SAS-CTCA对于冠状动脉狭窄诊断的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值,计算2名评价者间、两种检查方法之间的Kappa值,并对辐射剂量进行统计.结果 检查过程中患者的平均心率为(61±6)bpm,99.19%(614/619)的冠状动脉节段达到可供诊断的图像质量.与CCA相比,以冠状动脉血管为单位,SAS-CTCA在显示冠状动脉病变方面的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为96.2%(75/78)、88.2%(60/68)、90.4%(75/83)、95.2%(60/63).两种检查方法之间的Kappa值为0.848(P=0.000).SAS-CTCA的平均有效剂量为(2.95±0.96)mSv.结论 在严格控制入选标准的前提下,SAS-CTCA检查可以在降低辐射剂量的同时获得满意的图像质量,并对诊断冠状动脉狭窄具有较高的可信性.     

Lowering heart rate with an optimised breathing protocol for prospectively ECG-triggered CT coronary angiography

Objectives

The aim was to prospectively characterise the effect of the level of breath-hold on heart rate in CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering and its impact on coronary artery attenuation.

Methods

260 patients (86 women; mean age 59 ± 11 years) underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. Prior to CTCA, heart rates were recorded during 15 s of breath-hold at three different levels of inspiration (normal, intermediate and deep). The inspiration level with the lowest heart rate was chosen for actual CTCA scanning. Coronary artery attenuation was measured, and the presence of backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (as an indicator of increased intrathoracic pressure) was recorded.

Results

The mean heart rate at breath-hold was significantly different for the three inspiration levels (normal, 60 ± 8 bpm; intermediate, 59 ± 8 bpm; deep, 57 ± 7 bpm; p<0.001). The maximum heart rate reduction in each patient at breath-hold averaged 5.3 ± 5.1 bpm, and was observed at a normal inspiration depth in 23 (9%) patients, at an intermediate inspiration depth in 102 (39%) patients and at deep inspiration in 135 (52%) patients. Overall, there was no association between the level of breath-hold and coronary vessel attenuation (p-value was not significant). However, the backflow of contrast material into the inferior vena cava (n = 26) was found predominantly at deep inspiration levels (p<0.001), and, when it occurred, it was associated with reduced coronary attenuation compared with patients with no backflow (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The breath-hold level to best reduce heart rate for CTCA should be individually assessed prior to scanning because a mean heart rate reduction of 5 bpm can be achieved.Low-dose CT coronary angiography (CTCA) with prospective electrocardiogram (ECG) triggering has recently been introduced [1] and shown to offer a tremendous reduction in radiation dose [2-8], which makes its widespread clinical use feasible. Scanning in CTCA with prospective ECG triggering is exclusively performed during a short phase in diastole, called “diastasis”. The new technique appears to be more prone to artefacts caused by coronary motion. This is especially true in higher heart rates because diastasis disproportionally shortens with increasing heart rates [9] and the length of diastasis becomes shorter than the time required for image acquisition when the heart rate exceeds a certain threshold. Furthermore, when low-dose CTCA with prospective ECG triggering is performed with the smallest possible acquisition window to achieve the lowest possible radiation dose, it does not permit image reconstruction in other phases of the cardiac cycle to compensate for a possible reduction in image quality. An aggressive reduction in heart rate with β-blockers below a target heart rate of 63 bpm appears to be a prerequisite for low-dose CTCA [2,10].CTCA is generally performed during the patient''s breath-hold to avoid motion artefacts caused by movement of the thorax during image acquisition. However, the breath-hold and, particularly, the level (or depth) of breath-hold can affect heart rate [11]. Generally, heart rate is lowest at full vital capacity (deep inspiration) and highest at residual volume (normal inspiration) [11]. However, other factors, such as intrapleural and intrathoracic pressure and neural reflexes also determine the heart rate during breath-hold [11]. The lowest heart rates are not always reached at deep inspiration level during breath-hold. Furthermore, during CTCA, very deep inspiration for breath-hold may lead to an increased intrathoracic pressure (Valsalva effect), which may itself impair contrast material flow from the arm veins to the coronary arteries, and thus cause reduced coronary artery attenuation and decreased image quality.Accordingly, the purpose of this study was to describe and characterise the effect of breath-hold on heart rate and on coronary artery attenuation in CTCA with prospective ECG triggering.     

Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography (DSCT) for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) in a population with extensive coronary calcifications without heart rate control. Thirty patients (24 male, 6 female, mean age 63.1±11.3 years) with a high pre-test probability of CAD underwent DSCT coronary angiography and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 14±9 days. No beta-blockers were administered prior to the scan. Two readers independently assessed image quality of all coronary segments with a diameter ≥1.5 mm using a four-point score (1: excellent to 4: not assessable) and qualitatively assessed significant stenoses as narrowing of the luminal diameter >50%. Causes of false-positive (FP) and false-negative (FN) ratings were assigned to calcifications or motion artifacts. ICA was considered the standard of reference. Mean body mass index was 28.3±3.9 kg/m² (range 22.4–36.3 kg/m²), mean heart rate during CT was 70.3±14.2 bpm (range 47–102 bpm), and mean Agatston score was 821±904 (range 0–3,110). Image quality was diagnostic (scores 1–3) in 98.6% (414/420) of segments (mean image quality score 1.68±0.75); six segments in three patients were considered not assessable (1.4%). DSCT correctly identified 54 of 56 significant coronary stenoses. Severe calcifications accounted for false ratings in nine segments (eight FP/one FN) and motion artifacts in two segments (one FP/one FN). Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value for evaluating CAD were 96.4, 97.5, 85.7, and 99.4%, respectively. First experience indicates that DSCT coronary angiography provides high diagnostic accuracy for assessment of CAD in a high pre-test probability population with extensive coronary calcifications and without heart rate control.     

Optimizing the Imaging Protocol for Ex Vivo Coronary Artery Wall Using High-Resolution MRI: An Experimental Study on Porcine and Human

Objective

To optimize the MR imaging protocol for coronary arterial wall depiction in vitro and characterize the coronary atherosclerotic plaques.

Materials and Methods

MRI examination was prospectively performed in ten porcine hearts in order to optimize the MR imaging protocol. Various surface coils were used for coronary arterial wall imaging with the same parameters. Then, the image parameters were further optimized for high-resolution coronary wall imaging. The signal-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-noise ratio (CNR) of images were measured. Finally, 8 human cadaver hearts with coronary atherosclerotic plaques were prospectively performed with MRI examination using optimized protocol in order to characterize the coronary atherosclerotic plaques.

Results

The SNR and CNR of MR image with temporomandibular coil were the highest of various surface coils. High-resolution and high SNR and CNR for ex vivo coronary artery wall depiction can be achieved using temporomandibular coil with 512 × 512 in matrix. Compared with histopathology, the sensitivity and specificity of MRI for identifying advanced plaques were: type IV-V (lipid, necrosis, fibrosis), 94% and 95%; type VI (hemorrhage), 100% and 98%; type VII (calcification), 91% and 100%; and type VIII (fibrosis without lipid core), 100% and 98%, respectively.

Conclusion

Temporomandibular coil appears to be dramatically superior to eight-channel head coil and knee coil for ex vivo coronary artery wall imaging, providing higher spatial resolution and improved the SNR. Ex vivo high-resolution MRI has capability to distinguish human coronary atherosclerotic plaque compositions and accurately classify advanced plaques.     

The Adverse Events and Hemodynamic Effects of Adenosine-Based Cardiac MRI

Objective

We wanted to prospectively assess the adverse events and hemodynamic effects associated with an intravenous adenosine infusion in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease and who were undergoing cardiac MRI.

Materials and Methods

One hundred and sixty-eight patients (64 ± 9 years) received adenosine (140 µg/kg/min) during cardiac MRI. Before and during the administration, the heart rate, systemic blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were monitored using a MRI-compatible system. We documented any signs and symptoms of potential adverse events.

Results

In total, 47 out of 168 patients (28%) experienced adverse effects, which were mostly mild or moderate. In 13 patients (8%), the adenosine infusion was discontinued due to intolerable dyspnea or chest pain. No high grade atrioventricular block, bronchospasm or other life-threatening adverse events occurred. The hemodynamic measurements showed a significant increase in the heart rate during adenosine infusion (69.3 ± 11.7 versus 82.4 ± 13.0 beats/min, respectively; p < 0.001). A significant but clinically irrelevant increase in oxygen saturation occurred during adenosine infusion (96 ± 1.9% versus 97 ± 1.3%, respectively; p < 0.001). The blood pressure did not significantly change during adenosine infusion (systolic: 142.8 ± 24.0 versus 140.9 ± 25.7 mmHg; diastolic: 80.2 ± 12.5 mmHg versus 78.9 ± 15.6, respectively).

Conclusion

This study confirms the safety of adenosine infusion during cardiac MRI. A considerable proportion of all patients will experience minor adverse effects and some patients will not tolerate adenosine infusion. However, all adverse events can be successfully managed by a radiologist. The increased heart rate during adenosine infusion highlights the need to individually adjust the settings according to the patient, e.g., the number of slices of myocardial perfusion imaging.