Differential contributions of adenosine to hypoxia-evoked depressions of three neuronal pathways in isolated spinal cord of neonatal rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Hypoxic effects on neuronal functions vary significantly with experimental conditions, but the mechanism for this is unclear. Adenosine has been reported to play a key role in depression of neuronal activities in the CNS during acute hypoxia. Hence, we examined the effect of acute hypoxia on different spinal reflex potentials and the contribution of adenosine to them.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Spinal reflex potentials, monosynaptic reflex potential (MSR), slow ventral root potential (sVRP) and dorsal root potential (DRP), were measured in the isolated spinal cord of the neonatal rat. Adenosine release was measured by using enzymatic biosensors.

KEY RESULTS

In the spinal cord preparation isolated from postnatal day 5–8 rats at 27°C, acute hypoxia induced adenosine release and depressed three reflex potentials. However, in postnatal day 0–3 rats at 27°C, the hypoxic-induced adenosine release and depression of MSR were negligible, while the depression of sVRP and DRP were perceptible responses. In postnatal day 0–3 rats at 33°C, hypoxia evoked adenosine release and depression of MSR. An adenosine A₁ receptor selective antagonist and a high [Ca²⁺]_o, which suppressed adenosine release, abolished the hypoxic-induced depression of MSR but not those of sVRP and DRP.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Hypoxic-induced depression of MSR depends on adenosine release, which is highly susceptible to age, temperature and [Ca²⁺]_o. However, a large part of the depressions of DRP and sVRP are mediated via adenosine-independent mechanisms. This differential contribution of adenosine to depression is suggested to be an important factor for the variable effects of hypoxia on neuronal functions.     

Inhibitory effects of dopamine on spinal synaptic transmission via dopamine D1-like receptors in neonatal rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dopamine released from the endings of descending dopaminergic nerve fibres in the spinal cord may be involved in modulating functions such as locomotion and nociception. Here, we examined the effects of dopamine on spinal synaptic transmissions in rats.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Spinal reflex potentials, monosynaptic reflex potential (MSR) and slow ventral root potential (sVRP), were measured in the isolated spinal cord of the neonatal rat. Dopamine release was measured by HPLC.

KEY RESULTS

Dopamine at lower concentrations (<1 µM) depressed sVRP, which is a C fibre-evoked polysynaptic response and believed to reflect nociceptive transmission. At higher concentrations (>1 µM), in addition to a potent sVRP depression, dopamine depolarized baseline potential and slightly depressed MSR. Depression of sVRP by dopamine was partially reversed by dopamine D₁-like but not by D₂-like receptor antagonists. {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SKF83959","term_id":"1155968032","term_text":"SKF83959"}}SKF83959 and {"type":"entrez-protein","attrs":{"text":"SKF81297","term_id":"1156277425","term_text":"SKF81297"}}SKF81297, D₁-like receptor agonists, and methamphetamine, an endogenous dopamine releaser, also caused the inhibition of sVRP. Methamphetamine also depressed MSR, which was inhibited by ketanserin, a 5-HT_2A/2C receptor antagonist. Methamphetamine induced the release of dopamine and 5-HT from spinal cords, indicating that the release of endogenous dopamine and 5-HT depresses sVRP and MSR respectively.

CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS

These results suggested that dopamine at lower concentrations preferentially inhibited sVRP, which is mediated via dopamine D₁-like and other unidentified receptors. The dopamine-evoked depression is involved in modulating the spinal functions by the descending dopaminergic pathways.     

Adenosine and inosine release during hypoxia in the isolated spinal cord of neonatal rats

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Adenosine and inosine accumulate extracellularly during hypoxia/ischaemia in the brain and may act as neuroprotectants. In spinal cord, there is pharmacological evidence for increases in extracellular adenosine during hypoxia, but no direct measurements of purine release. Furthermore, the efflux pathways and origin of extracellular purines are not defined. To characterize hypoxia-evoked purine accumulation, we examined the effect of acute hypoxia on the extracellular levels of adenosine and inosine in isolated spinal cords from rats.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Extracellular adenosine and inosine concentrations were assayed in an in vitro preparation of the isolated spinal cord of the neonatal rat by HPLC.

KEY RESULTS

The extracellular level of inosine was about 10-fold higher than that of adenosine. Acute hypoxia (10 min) caused a temperature-dependent increase in these two purines, which were inhibited by an increase in external Ca²⁺, but not by several inhibitors of efflux pathways or metabolic enzymes of adenine nucleotides. Inhibitors of adenosine deaminase or the equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT) abolished the hypoxia-evoked increase in inosine but not adenosine. The inhibition of glial metabolism abolished the increase of both purines evoked by hypoxia but not by oxygen-glucose deprivation, hypercapnia or an adenosine kinase inhibitor.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our data suggest that hypoxia releases adenosine itself from intracellular sources. Inosine formed intracellularly may be released through ENTs. During hypoxia, astrocytes appear to play a key role in purine release from neonatal rat spinal cord.     

Facilitatory and inhibitory modulation by endogenous adenosine of noradrenaline release in the epididymal portion of rat vas deferens

Summary The present study aimed at determining the modulation by adenosine of the release of noradrenaline in the epididymal portion of the rat vas deferens. The tissues were treated with pargyline and perifused in the presence of desipramine and yohimbine. Up to four periods of electrical stimulation were applied (5 Hz, 9 min).The A₁-adenosine receptor selective agonist R-N⁶-phenylisopropyladenosine (R-PIA; 100–900 nmol·l^–1) reduced, whereas the A_2A-receptor selective agonist 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (CGS21680; 3–30nmol·l^–1) increased the electrically-evoked noradrenaline overflow in a concentration-dependent manner. The nonselective agonist 5-N-ethy1carboxamidoadenosine (NECA; 30–300 nmol·l^–1) reduced noradrenaline overflow, but the effect did not depend on the concentration. Adenosine deaminase at the concentration of 0.5 ·ml^–1 decreased but at that of 2.0 ·ml^–1 increased noradrenaline overflow. The inhibitors of adenosine uptake, S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine (NBTI; 50 nmol·l^–1) and dipyridamole (3 mol·l^–1), increased the electrically-evoked noradrenaline overflow. The A₁-adenosine receptor antagonist 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX; 20 nmol·l^–1) caused an increase whereas the A₂-adenosine receptor antagonist 3,7-dimethyl-1-(2-propynyl)xanthine (DMPX; 0.1 mol·l^–1) caused a decrease. NBTI (50 nmol·l^–1), partially antagonized the effect of both DPCPX (20 nmol·l^–1) and DMPX (0.1 mol·l^–1).It is concluded that, in the epididymal portion of the rat vas deferens, endogenous adenosine tonically modulates the release of noradrenaline evoked by electrical stimulation, through activation of both inhibitory (A₁) and facilitatory (A_2A) adenosine receptors.Abbreviations CGS 21680 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)phenethylamino-5-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine - DMPX 3,7-dimethyl-l-(2-propynyl)xanthine - DPCPX 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine - NBTI S-(4-nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine - NECA 5-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine - R-PIA R-N⁶-phenylisopropyladenosine Correspondence to J. Gongalves at the above address     

Effects of kinin B1 and B2 receptor antagonists on overactive urinary bladder syndrome induced by spinal cord injury in rats

Background and Purpose

Kinin B₁ and B₂ receptors have been implicated in physiological and pathological conditions of the urinary bladder. However, their role in overactive urinary bladder (OAB) syndrome following spinal cord injury (SCI) remains elusive.

Experimental Approach

We investigated the role of kinin B₁ and B₂ receptors in OAB after SCI in rats.

Key Results

SCI was associated with a marked inflammatory response and functional changes in the urinary bladder. SCI resulted in an up-regulation of B₁ receptor mRNA in the urinary bladder, dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord, as well as in B₁ protein in the urinary bladder and B₁ and B₂ receptor protein in spinal cord. Interestingly, both B₁ and B₂ protein expression were similarly distributed in detrusor muscle and urothelium of animals with SCI. In vitro stimulation of urinary bladder with the selective B₁ or B₂ agonist elicited a higher concentration-response curve in the SCI urinary bladder than in naive or sham urinary bladders. Cystometry revealed that treatment of SCI animals with the B₂ selective antagonist icatibant reduced the amplitude and number of non-voiding contractions (NVCs). The B₁ antagonist des-Arg⁹-[Leu⁸]-bradykinin reduced the number of NVCs while the non-peptide B₁ antagonist SSR240612 reduced the number of NVCs, the urinary bladder capacity and increased the voiding efficiency and voided volume.

Conclusions and Implications

Taken together, these data show the important roles of B₁ and B₂ receptors in OAB following SCI in rats and suggest that blockade of these receptors could be a potential therapeutic target for controlling OAB.     

A1 and A2 adenosine receptor modulation of contractility in the cauda epididymis of the guinea-pig

1. The effects of adenosine receptor agonists upon phenylephrine-stimulated contractility and [³H]-cyclic adenosine monophosphate ([³H]-cyclic AMP) accumulation in the cauda epididymis of the guinea-pig were investigated. The α₁-adrenoceptor agonist, phenylephrine elicited concentration dependent contractile responses from preparations of epididymis. In the absence or presence of the L-type Ca²⁺ channel blocker, nifedipine (10 μM) the non-selective adenosine receptor agonist, 5′-N-ethylcarboxamido-adenosine (NECA, 1 μM) shifted phenylephrine concentration-response curves to the left (4 and 5 fold respectively). Following the incubation of preparations with pertussis toxin (200 ng ml⁻¹ 24 h) NECA shifted phenylephrine concentration-response curves to the right (5.7±0.9 fold).
2. In the presence of phenylephrine (1 μM), NECA and the A₁ adenosine receptor selective agonists, N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and (2S)-N⁶-[2-endo-norbornyl]adenosine ((S)-ENBA) elicited concentration-responses dependent contractions from preparations of epididymis (pEC₅₀ values 8.18±0.19, 7.79±0.29 and 8.15±0.43 respectively). The A₃ adenosine receptor agonists N⁶-iodobenzyl-5′-N-methyl-carboxamido adenosine (IBMECA) and N⁶-2-(4-aminophenyl) ethyladenosine (APNEA) mimicked this effect (but only at concentrations greater than 10 μM). In the presence of 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX, 30 nM) CPA concentration-response curves were shifted, in parallel to the right (apparent pK_B 8.75±0.88) and the maximal response to NECA was reduced.
3. In the presence of DPCPX (100 nM) the adenosine agonist NECA and the A_2A adenosine receptor selective agonist, CGS 21680 (2-p-(2-carboxyethyl)-phenethylamino-N-ethylcarboxamido adenosine), but not CPA, inhibited phenylephrine (20 μM) stimulated contractions (pIC₅₀ 7.15±0.48). This effect of NECA was blocked by xanthine amine congener (XAC, 1 μM) and the A_2A adenosine receptor-selective antagonist 4-(2-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl)phenol (ZM 241385; 30 nM).
4. (S)-ENBA (in the absence and presence of ZM 241385, 100 nM), but not NECA or CPA inhibited the forskolin (30 μM)-stimulated accumulation of [³H]-cyclic AMP in preparations of the epididymis of the guinea-pig (by 17±6% of control). In the presence of DPCPX (100 nM) NECA and CGS 21680, but not (S)-ENBA, increased the accumulation of [³H]-cyclic AMP in preparations of epididymis (pEC₅₀ values 5.35±0.35 and 6.42±0.40 respectively), the NECA-induced elevation of [³H]-cyclic AMP was antagonised by XAC (apparent pK_B 6.88±0.88) and also by the A_2A adenosine receptor antagonist, ZM 241385 (apparent pK_B 8.60± 0.76).
5. These studies are consistent with the action of stable adenosine analogues at post-junctional A₁ and A₂ adenosine receptors in the epididymis of the guinea-pig. A₁ Adenosine receptors potentiate α₁-adrenoceptor contractility, an effect blocked by pertussis toxin, but which may not be dependent upon an inhibition of adenylyl cyclase. The epididymis of the guinea-pig also contains A₂ adenosine receptors, possibly of the A_2A subtype, which both inhibit contractility and also stimulate adenylyl cyclase.

     

The pharmacology of descending responses evoked by thoracic stimulation in the neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro

Summary Spinal cords were maintained in vitro and suction electrodes used to record activity in lumbar 4 or 5 ventral roots. Stimulation of the latero-ventral aspect of the thoracic cord elicited fast and slow responses on the same and on the opposite side of the cord. There were 5 distinct responses: ipsilaterally a short latency (d ISL), a polysynaptic and a slow response, and contralaterally a fast (d CON FAST) and a slow response. The largest amplitude component, d ISL, may arise from stimulation of propriospinal neurones; the other responses may arise from stimulation of descending pathways. The slow responses had half decay times of 13–15 s and required a high intensity stimulus to elicit a maximal response. All 5 responses were blocked by 6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione suggesting that kainate/AMPA receptors were involved in their generation. In addition, NMDA receptors were involved in generation of the slow responses. Potentiation of certain responses by the 5-HT₂ antagonists, ketanserin, ritanserin and Lilly 53857, indicated that endogenous 5-HT was exerting a modulatory depression of these responses. In addition to eliciting the 5 responses, thoracic cord stimulation caused an inhibition of segmental reflexes evoked from the lumbar dorsal root. Exogenous 5-HT, 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin, 5-carboxamidotryptamine, dipropyl-5-carboxamidotryptamine and methysergide depressed all or some of the descending responses. Blockade of adrenoceptors using yohimbine, idazoxan, prazosin or propranolol had no unequivocal effect suggesting that the release of endogenous catecholamines was minimal. Clonidine was a potent depressant of the slow responses. Release of glycine and -aminobutyric acid (GABA) (acting upon GABA_A receptors) by stimulation modulated d CON FAST and both slow responses. The large potentiation of slow responses by bicuculline suggests a considerable release of GABA. The absence of effect of 2-OH-saclofen did not suggest any activation of GABA_B receptors by endogenous GABA, but both muscimol and baclofen had potent depressant actions on descending responses.It was concluded that glutamate was involved in the generation of these responses, they were modulated differentially by endogenous glycine, GABA and 5-HT, and application of muscimol, baclofen, clonidine, 5-HT and 5-HT receptor ligands modified the responses.Correspondence to D.I. Wallis at the above address     

Role of ATP and related purines in inhibitory neurotransmission to the pig urinary bladder neck

Background and purpose:

As adenosine 5′-triphosphate (ATP) is one of the inhibitory mediators of the bladder outflow region, this study investigates the possible release of ATP or related purines in response to electrical field stimulation (EFS) and the purinoceptor(s) involved in nerve-mediated relaxations of the pig urinary bladder neck.

Experimental approach:

Urothelium-denuded and intact phenylephrine-precontracted strips were mounted in organ baths containing physiological saline solution at 37°C and gassed with 95% O₂ and 5% CO₂ for isometric force recordings.

Key results:

EFS, in the presence of atropine, guanethidine and N^G-nitro-L-arginine, and exogenous purines, produced frequency- and concentration-dependent relaxations respectively. Adenosine 5′-diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine were more potent than ATP in producing relaxation, while uridine 5′-triphosphate, uridine 5′-diphosphate and α,β-methylene ATP were less effective. The non-selective P2 antagonist suramin, and the P2Y₁ and P1 receptor blockers 2′-deoxy-N6-methyladenosine 3′,5′-bisphosphate tetrasodium and 8-(p-sulphophenyl)theophylline, respectively, inhibited the responses to EFS and ATP. The P1 agonist''s potency was: 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA)>4-2[[6-amino-9-(N-ethyl-b-D-ribofuranuronamidosyl)-9H-purin-2-yl]amino]ethyl]benzene propanoic acid hydrochloride>2-chloro-N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine>-2-chloro-6-[[(3-iodophenyl)methyl]amino]-9H-purin-9-yl]-1-deoxy-N-methyl-b-D-ribofuranuronamide = adenosine. 4-(-[7-amino-2-(2-furyl)[1,2,4]triazolo[2,3-a][1,3,5]triazin-5-ylamino]ethyl) phenol, an A_2A antagonist, reduced the relaxations to EFS, adenosine and NECA. In urothelium-intact samples, relaxations to EFS and purines were smaller than in urothelium-denuded preparations. Neuronal voltage-gated Na⁺ channels blockade failed to modify ATP relaxations. At basal tension, EFS- and ATP-induced contractions were resistant to desensitization or blockade of P2X₁ and P2X₃ receptors.

Conclusions and implications:

ATP is involved in the non-adrenergic, non-cholinergic, non-nitrergic inhibitory neurotransmission in the pig bladder neck, producing relaxation largely through muscle A_2A receptors after breakdown to adenosine, and P2Y₁ receptors after breakdown to ADP. Antagonists of these receptors may be useful for urinary incontinence treatment produced by intrinsic sphincteric deficiency.     

Tonic adenosine A1 and A2A receptor activation is required for the excitatory action of VIP on synaptic transmission in the CA1 area of the hippocampus

Adenosine can regulate synaptic transmission through modulation of the action of other neurotransmitters. The influence of adenosine on VIP enhancement of synaptic transmission in hippocampal slices was investigated. Facilitation of fEPSP slope by 1 nM VIP (23.3+/-1.3%) was turned into an inhibition (-12.1+/-3.4%) when extracellular endogenous adenosine was removed using adenosine deaminase (ADA, 1U/ml). Blockade of adenosine A(1) receptors with 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX, 10 nM) or of A(2A) receptors with ZM241385 (20 nM) attenuated the effect of VIP. When both DPCPX and ZM241385 were present the effect of VIP was abolished. In the presence of ADA, selective A(1) receptor activation with N(6)-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA, 15 nM) or A(2A) receptor-activation with CGS21680 (10 nM) partially readmitted the excitatory effect of VIP on fEPSPs. In contrast, facilitation of PS amplitude by 1 nM VIP (19.1+/-1.2%) was attenuated in the presence of ADA or DPCPX but was not changed by ZM241385. CPA, in the presence of ADA, fully restored the effect of VIP on PS amplitude. In conclusion, VIP facilitation of synaptic transmission to hippocampal pyramidal cell dendrites is dependent on both A(1) and A(2A) receptor activation by endogenous adenosine. VIP effects on PS amplitude are only dependent on A(1) adenosine receptor activation. This differential sensitivity to adenosine modulation might be due to the different VIP circuits contributing to VIP effects on pyramidal cell dendrites and pyramidal cell bodies.     

Phosphorylation influences neurosteroid modulation of synaptic GABAA receptors in rat CA1 and dentate gyrus neurones

The neurosteroid 5beta-pregnan-3alpha-ol-20-one (5beta3alpha) is a potent, endogenous, positive allosteric modulator of the GABA(A) receptor. Relatively low concentrations of 5beta3alpha (10-100 nM), thought to occur physiologically, caused a concentration-dependent slowing of the decay of GABA-mediated miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (mIPSCs) recorded from hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurones. However, much greater concentrations of this neurosteroid (> or =300 nM) were required to similarly influence dentate granule cell mIPSCs. By contrast, the allosteric modulators pentobarbitone and flunitrazepam were equi-effective in prolonging mIPSCs in both neuronal types. Hence, the neurosteroid selectively differentiates between the synaptic GABA(A) receptors of these hippocampal neurones. Inhibition of either protein kinase A, or C, greatly reduced the sensitivity of CA1 synaptic GABA(A) receptors to 5beta3alpha, but not pentobarbitone, whereas stimulation of PKC had no effect on steroid sensitivity. However, in dentate gyrus granule cells, activation of PKC made mIPSCs sensitive to a previously ineffective concentration of 5beta3alpha. Collectively, these results suggest that the GABA-modulatory effects of physiological levels of the neurosteroid will not be uniformly experienced throughout the central nervous system, or even within the same brain region such as the hippocampus, but will be neurone-specific and will be dependent on the phosphorylation status of the GABA(A) receptor, or associated proteins.     

Control of vascular tone by purines and pyrimidines

In this Commentary, the roles of uridine adenosine tetraphosphate as an endothelium-derived contracting or relaxing factor described in the paper by Tölle et al. are considered and put into the wider context of the mechanisms of control of vascular tone by purinergic signalling via receptors located on both smooth muscle and endothelial cells.     

A spinal mechanism of action for duloxetine in a rat model of painful diabetic neuropathy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study was designed to clarify mechanisms responsible for the anti-allodynic effects of duloxetine in diabetes.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat model was used to compare the efficacy of duloxetine, 5-HT, the 5-HT_2A receptor agonist [1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride (DOI)] and two antagonists (ketanserin and pruvanserin) on tactile allodynia.

KEY RESULTS

Systemic or intrathecal injection of duloxetine alleviated tactile allodynia in diabetic rats. The effect of systemic duloxetine was reduced by intrathecal administration of ketanserin or pruvanserin, indicating participation of spinal 5-HT_2A receptors in the mechanism of action of duloxetine. In contrast to spinal delivery, systemic and local peripheral injections of ketanserin or pruvanserin alleviated tactile allodynia in diabetic rats. This effect was reversed immediately after systemic or local DOI injection.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

These results support the involvement of spinal 5-HT_2A receptors in the ability of duloxetine to ameliorate painful diabetic neuropathy. Our data also suggest that the role of 5-HT_2A receptors depends on the level of the neuraxis at which activation takes place, with peripheral activation contributing to tactile allodynia in diabetic rats, whereas spinal activation of this receptor alleviates tactile allodynia. The development of selective peripheral 5-HT_2A receptor antagonists may offer a novel approach for the treatment of diabetic neuropathic pain.     

Cannabidiol inhibits synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal cultures and slices via multiple receptor pathways

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Cannabidiol (CBD) has emerged as an interesting compound with therapeutic potential in several CNS disorders. However, whether it can modulate synaptic activity in the CNS remains unclear. Here, we have investigated whether CBD modulates synaptic transmission in rat hippocampal cultures and acute slices.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

The effect of CBD on synaptic transmission was examined in rat hippocampal cultures and acute slices using whole cell patch clamp and standard extracellular recordings respectively.

KEY RESULTS

Cannabidiol decreased synaptic activity in hippocampal cultures in a concentration-dependent and Pertussis toxin-sensitive manner. The effects of CBD in culture were significantly reduced in the presence of the cannabinoid receptor (CB₁) inverse agonist, {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY320135","term_id":"1257555575","term_text":"LY320135"}}LY320135 but were unaffected by the 5-HT_1A receptor antagonist, WAY100135. In hippocampal slices, CBD inhibited basal synaptic transmission, an effect that was abolished by the proposed CB₁ receptor antagonist, AM251, in addition to {"type":"entrez-nucleotide","attrs":{"text":"LY320135","term_id":"1257555575","term_text":"LY320135"}}LY320135 and WAY100135.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Cannabidiol reduces synaptic transmission in hippocampal in vitro preparations and we propose a role for both 5-HT_1A and CB₁ receptors in these CBD-mediated effects. These data offer some mechanistic insights into the effects of CBD and emphasize that further investigations into the actions of CBD in the CNS are required in order to elucidate the full therapeutic potential of CBD.     

A1 adenosine receptor modulation of electrically-evoked contractions in the bisected vas deferens and cauda epididymis of the guinea-pig

1. The effects of adenosine receptor agonists upon both electrically-evoked and phenylephrine-induced contractile responses were investigated in the bisected vas deferens and the cauda epididymis of the guinea-pig. Electrical field-stimulation (10 s trains of pulses at 9 Hz, 0.1 ms duration, supramaximal voltage) elicited biphasic and monophasic contractile responses from preparations of bisected vas deferens and cauda epididymis, respectively; these responses were abolished by tetrodotoxin (300 nM).
2. In the prostatic half of the vas deferens the A₁ selective adenosine receptor agonists, N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) and (2S)-N⁶-[2-endo-norbornyl]adenosine ((S)-ENBA) and the non-selective A₁/A₂ adenosine receptor agonist, 5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine (NECA) inhibited electrically-evoked contractions (pIC₅₀±s.e.mean values 6.15±0.24, 5.99±0.26 and 5.51±0.24, respectively). The responses to CPA were blocked by the A₁ adenosine receptor antagonist, 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine, DPCPX (100 nM).
3. In the epididymal half of the vas deferens NECA potentiated (at ⩽100 nM) and inhibited (at ⩾1 μM) electrically-evoked contractions. In the presence of the non-selective α-adrenoceptor antagonist phentolamine (3 μM), the α₁-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (100 nM), or at a reduced train length (3 s) NECA inhibited electrically-evoked contractions (pIC₅₀ values 6.05±0.25, 5.97±0.29 and 5.71±0.27, respectively). CPA (at 10 μM) also inhibited electrically-evoked contractions in this half of the vas deferens. In the presence of prazosin (100 nM), CPA also inhibited electrically-evoked contractions (pIC₅₀ 6.14±0.67); this effect was antagonized by DPCPX (30 nM, apparent pK_B 8.26±0.88). In the presence of the P2 purinoceptor antagonist, suramin (300 μM), CPA (up to 1 μM) potentiated electrically-evoked contractions.
4. NECA, CPA and APNEA potentiated electrically-evoked contractions in preparations of cauda epididymis (pEC₅₀ values 7.49±0.62, 7.65±0.74 and 5.84±0.86, respectively), the response to CPA was competitively antagonized by DPCPX (100 nM) with an apparent pK_B value of 7.64±0.64.
5. The α₁-adrenoceptor agonist phenylephrine elicited concentration-dependent contractile responses from preparations of bisected vas deferens and cauda epididymis. NECA (1 μM) potentiated responses to phenylephrine (⩽1 μM) in the epididymal, but not in the prostatic half of the vas deferens. In preparations of epididymis NECA (1 μM) shifted phenylephrine concentration response curves to the left (4.6 fold). In the presence of a fixed concentration of phenylephrine (1 μM), NECA elicited concentration-dependent contractions of preparations of the epididymal half of the vas deferens and of the epididymis (pEC₅₀ values 7.57±0.54 and 8.08±0.18, respectively). NECA did not potentiate responses to ATP in either the epididymal half of the vas deferens or the epididymis.
6. These studies are consistent with the action of stable adenosine analogues at prejunctional A₁ and postjunctional A₁-like adenosine receptors. The prejunctional A₁ adenosine receptors only inhibit the electrically-evoked contractions of purinergic origin (an effect predominant in the prostatic half of the vas deferens). At the epididymis, where electrically-evoked contractions are entirely adrenergic, the predominant adenosine receptor agonist effect is a potentiation of α₁-adrenoceptor-, but not of ATP-induced contractility.

     

Adenosine negatively regulates duodenal motility in mice: role of A(1) and A(2A) receptors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Adenosine is considered to be an important modulator of intestinal motility. This study was undertaken to investigate the role of adenosine in the modulation of contractility in the mouse duodenum and to characterize the adenosine receptor subtypes involved.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

RT-PCR was used to investigate the expression of mRNA encoding for A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃ receptors. Contractile activity was examined in vitro as changes in isometric tension.

KEY RESULTS

In mouse duodenum, all four classes of adenosine receptors were expressed, with the A_2B receptor subtype being confined to the mucosal layer. Adenosine caused relaxation of mouse longitudinal duodenal muscle; this was antagonized by the A₁ receptor antagonist and mimicked by N⁶-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA), selective A₁ agonist. The relaxation induced by A₁ receptor activation was insensitive to tetrodotoxin (TTX) or N^ω-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME). Adenosine also inhibited cholinergic contractions evoked by neural stimulation, effect reversed by the A₁ receptor antagonist, but not myogenic contractions induced by carbachol. CPA and 2-p-(2-carboxyethyl) phenethylamino-5′-N-ethylcarboxamidoadenosine hydrochloride hydrate (CGS-21680), A_2A receptor agonist, both inhibited the nerve-evoked cholinergic contractions. l-NAME prevented only the CGS-21680-induced effects. S-(4-Nitrobenzyl)-6-thioinosine, a nucleoside uptake inhibitor, reduced the amplitude of nerve-evoked cholinergic contractions, an effect reversed by an A_2A receptor antagonist or l-NAME.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Adenosine can negatively regulate mouse duodenal motility either by activating A₁ inhibitory receptors located post-junctionally or controlling neurotransmitter release via A₁ or A_2A receptors. Both receptors are available for pharmacological recruitment, even if only A_2A receptors appear to be preferentially stimulated by endogenous adenosine.

LINKED ARTICLE

This article is commented on by Antonioli et al., pp. 1577–1579 of this issue. To view this commentary visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01529.x     

Biphasic action of sarin on monosynaptic reflex in the neonatal rat spinal cord in vitro

The action of sarin, an organophosphorus (OP) compound, was examined in vitro for its effects on the spinal monosynaptic reflex (MSR) in neonatal rats. The effects of sarin were biphasic, i.e. facilitation at lower concentrations (2–20 nM) followed by depression of the MSR at concentrations above 30 nM. Facilitation of MSR was maximal (150% of control) at 20 nM sarin. The depression of MSR was maximal (70% of control) at 200 nM sarin, with half maximal inhibition occurring at 90 nM sarin. Atropine (200–500 nM) effectively reversed the depression caused by sarin, while pretreatment with low concentrations of atropine (10 nM) completely blocked the depression otherwise observed with sarin. Benactyzine was also effective in preventing sarin-induced depression, while pirenzepine was less effective. The nicotinic blocking agents tubocurarine and mecamylamine were, however, ineffective in preventing or reversing sarin-induced depression. The facilitation of MSR seen with lower concentrations (2–20 nM) correlated well with the blockade of late phase inhibition (between 30 and 50 ms conditioning-test interval) elicited in spinal cord by stimulating the adjacent dorsal root at various condition-test intervals, which has been shown elsewhere to be sensitive to bicuculline (Deshpande and Warnick 1988). Thus it is speculated that sarin at lower concentrations blocks GABA transmission, producing facilitation, and at higher concentrations activates the muscarinic receptors producing depression of MSR. The beneficial action of pretreatment with antimuscarinic agents may be attributed to the protection of the muscarinic receptors.     

Systemic morphine produce antinociception mediated by spinal 5-HT7, but not 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors in the spinal cord

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The serotonergic system within the spinal cord have been proposed to play an important role in the analgesic effects of systemic morphine. Currently, seven groups of 5-HT receptors (5-HT1-7) have been characterized. One of the most recently identified subtypes of 5 HT receptor is the 5-HT7 receptor. We aimed to examine the role of spinal 5-HT7 receptors in the antinociceptive effects of systemic morphine. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: The involvement of spinal 5-HT7 receptor in systemic morphine antinociception was compared to that of the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 receptors by using the selective 5-HT7 receptor antagonist, SB-269970, the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, the selective 5-HT2 antagonist ketanserin as well as the non-selective 5-HT1,2,7 receptor antagonist, metergoline. Nociception was evaluated by the radiant heat tail-flick test. KEY RESULTS: I.t. administration of SB-269970 (10 microg) and metergoline (20 microg) completely blocked the s.c. administered morphine-induced (1, 3, 5 and 10 mg kg(-1)) antinociception in a time-dependent manner. Additionally, i.t. administration of SB-269970 (1, 3, 10 and 20 microg) and metergoline (1, 5, 10 and 20 microg) dose dependently inhibited the antinociceptive effects of a maximal dose of morphine (10 mg kg(-1), s.c.). I.t. administration of WAY 100635 (20 microg) or ketanserine (20 microg) did not alter morphine-induced (1, 3, 5 and 10 mg kg(-1), s.c.) antinociception. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings indicate that the involvement of spinal 5-HT7, but not of 5-HT1A or of 5-HT2 receptors in the antinociceptive effects of systemic morphine.     

Agonist-dependent modulation of arterial endothelinA receptor function

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Endothelin-1 (ET-1) causes long-lasting vasoconstrictions. These can be prevented by ET(A) receptor antagonists but are only poorly reversed by these drugs. We tested the hypothesis that endothelin ET(A) receptors are susceptible to allosteric modulation by endogenous agonists and exogenous ligands. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Rat isolated mesenteric resistance arteries were pretreated with capsaicin and studied in wire myographs, in the presence of L-NAME and indomethacin to concentrate on arterial smooth muscle responses. KEY RESULTS Endothelins caused contractions with equal maximum but differing potency (ET-1 = ET-2 > ET-3). ET-1(1-15) neither mimicked nor antagonized these effects in the absence and presence of ET(16-21). 4(Ala) ET-1 (ET(B) agonist) and BQ788 (ET(B) antagonist) were without effects. BQ123 (peptide ET(A) antagonist) reduced the sensitivity and relaxed the contractile responses to endothelins. Both effects depended on the agonist (pK(B): ET-3 = ET-1 > ET-2; % relaxation: ET-3 = ET-2 > ET-1). Also, with PD156707 (non-peptide ET(A) antagonist) agonist-dependence and a discrepancy between preventive and inhibitory effects were observed. The latter was even more marked with bulky analogues of BQ123 and PD156707. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS These findings indicate allosteric modulation of arterial smooth muscle ET(A) receptor function by endogenous agonists and by exogenous endothelin receptor antagonists. This may have consequences for the diagnosis and pharmacotherapy of diseases involving endothelins.     

Effects of morphine and endomorphins on the polysynaptic reflex in the isolated rat spinal cord

At the spinal level, -opioids exert their actions on nociceptive primary afferent neurons both pre- and postsynaptically. In the present study, we used an in vitro isolated neonatal rat (11–15 days old) spinal cord preparation to examine the effects of morphine and the endogenous -opioid ligands endomorphin-1 (EM-1) and endomorphin-2 (EM-2) on the polysynaptic reflex (PSR) of dorsal root-ventral root (DR-VR) reflex. The actions of -opioids on spinal nociception were investigated by quantification of the firing frequency and the mean amplitude of the PSR evoked by stimuli with 20×threshold intensity. EM-1 decreased the mean amplitude of PSR, whereas EM-2 and morphine decreased the firing frequency. The pattern of the effects elicited by morphine was the same as that for EM-2, except at high concentration. Naloxonazine, a selective ₁ opioid receptor antagonist, had no significant effect on PSR by itself, but blocked the inhibition of PSR firing frequency or amplitude induced by EM-1, -2 and morphine. This may suggest that EM-1, EM-2 and morphine modulate spinal nociception differently and act mainly at the ₁-opioid receptors. Although they all act via ₁-opioid receptors, their different effects on the PSR may suggest the existence of different subtypes of the ₁-opioid receptor. The present data is also consistent with a further hypothesis, namely, that morphine and EM-2 activate a subtype of ₁-opioid receptor presynaptically, while EM-1 acts mainly through another subtype postsynaptically. However, since other reports indicate that EM-2, but not EM-1, could stimulate the release of enkephalins or dynorphin, presynaptic and receptors may be also involved indirectly in the different regulation by -opioids at the spinal level.     

Purinoceptor-mediated modulation by endogenous and exogenous agonists of stimulation-evoked [3H]noradrenaline release on rat iris

Summary To investigate whether endogenous purinoceptor agonists affect the sympathetic neurotransmission in the rat isolated iris, and to classify the purinoceptors modulating exocytotic [³H]-noradrenaline release, we have determined the effect of adenosine receptor antagonists on, and the relative potency of selected agonists in modulating, the field stimulation-evoked (3 Hz, 2 min) [³H]-noradrenaline overflow. In addition, the apparent affinity constants of 8-phenyltheophylline (8-PT) and 1,3-dipropyl-8-cyclopentylxanthine (DPCPX) in antagonizing the prejunctional effects of purinoceptor agonists were estimated.The relatively A₁-selective DPCPX 10 and 100 nmol/l increased the evoked [³H]-noradrenaline overflow by about 25%–35%a indicating a minor inhibition of evoked release by endogenous purinoceptor agonists probably via an A₁ adenosine receptor. Whereas the A₁/A₂-antagonist 8-PT failed to increase the evoked [³H]-noradrenaline overflow in the absence of exogenous agonists (without or with dipyridamole 1 pmol/l present), the relatively A₂-selective antagonist CP-66,713 (4-amino-8-chloro -1-phenyl(1,2,4)triazolo(4,3-a)quinoxaline) 100 nmol/l decreased it by 20%–30% in the absence and continuous presence of DPCPX. This may be compatible with a minor A₂-mediated facilitation by an endogenous purinoceptor agonist.All exogenous agonists tested (except UTP 100 mol/l) inhibited the evoked [³H]-noradrenaline overflow. The relative order of agonist potency (IC4o, concentration in mol/l for inhibition of evoked release by 40%) was CPA (N⁶-(cyclopentyl)adenosine, 0.004) > R-PIA (R(–)N6-(2phenylisopropyl)adenosine, 0.066) = CHA (N⁶-(cyclohexyl)adenosine, 0.082) > NECA (N⁵-(ethyl-carboxamido)adenosine 0.44) > ADO (adenosine, 4.1). ATP was n early equipotent with ADO. Maximum inhibition was 70%–80% and similar for all agonists. Adenosine deaminase 1 u/ml failed to affect the ATP-induced, but abolished the adenosine-induced prejunctional inhibition. The adenosine uptake inhibitor S-p-nitrobenzyl-6-thioguanosine (NBTG) failed to enhance the potency of ADO and ATP. The A₁-selective antagonist DPCPX 10 nmol/l did not reduce the ATP potency indicating an effect of ATP per se not mediated via an A₁ purinoceptor.Prejunctional affinity constants of 8-PT were 6.07 when tested against adenosine (in the presence of dipyridamole), and 6.60 against CHA. The apparent -log K_B of DPCPX tested against CPA was 9.71. The high DPCPX affinity is compatible with an A₁ adenosine receptor mediating inhibition of sympathetic neurotransmission in rat iris. This receptor may not be the only prejunctional purinoceptor on rat iris sympathetic nerves. The receptor by which ATP acts prejunctionally in this tissue remains to be determined.This study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Fu 163/2 and 163/3) Send offprint requests to H. Fuder at the above address