Off-pump tricuspid valve replacement for severe infective endocarditis

A 30-year-old man who is a heroin addict was diagnosed with uncontrolled tricuspid valve endocarditis and repeated lung abscesses. He underwent tricuspid valvectomy for the endocarditis. After surgery the patient had severe tricuspid regurgitation and hypoxemia develop. Due to severe tricuspid regurgitation-induced ventricular distension and persistent low cardiac output, reimplantation of the tricuspid valve was planned for 2 weeks after the first operation. To avoid lung injury caused by the cardiopulmonary bypass and to preserve right ventricular function, a self-made superior and inferior vena cava shunt was connected to the pulmonary artery. The tricuspid valve was implanted without cardiopulmonary bypass.     

Staged laparoscopic splenectomy and valve replacement in splenic abscess and infective endocarditis

Splenic abscess is a rare clinical entity that is most commonly associated with infective endocarditis. Valve replacement in the setting of an unaddressed splenic abscess is associated with a high incidence of prosthetic valve infection and death. We describe 2 patients with infective endocarditis and splenic abscess treated by laparoscopic splenectomy followed by valve replacement.     

Long-term survival after aortic valve replacement for native active infective endocarditis

Background: The objective of this study was to analyse the impact of acute surgery for native aortic valve endocarditis and its influence on the long-term prognosis after surgery. Methods: A total of 161 patients underwent aortic valve replacement for native active aortic valve endocarditis (NAAVE) during a 29-year period, from 1967 to 1995 (age range: 10 to 72 years; mean 48 ± 12). The main indication for surgery was progressive congestive heart failure (76%). Other indications were unbeatable sepsis (27%), peripheral or central emboli (12%) and, from 1978, echocardiographic evidence of friable, pedunculated vegetations (3%). Streptococcal and staphylococcal infections predominated. Concomitant procedures were performed in 27% of the patients, including mitral and tricuspid valve surgery and coronary bypass procedures. Results: Operative mortality was 8% in the majority of cases caused by heart failure or multiorgan failure. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified NYHA class IV to be an independent predictor for postoperative death. Long-term survival for discharged patients was 75% at 10 years and 58% at 15 years, with a mortality rate of 3.6%/patient/year. Cox regression analysis identified the year of operation, trivalvular endocarditis and staphylococcal infection as independent predictors of survival. At 10 and 15 years after aortic valve replacement, 91% and 84% of the patients, respectively, were free of recurrent endocarditis. The presence of an abscess cavity at first operation was found to be predictive of recurrent endocarditis. Conclusions: Valve replacement for NAAVE offers a good chance for a cure and satisfactory long-term survival. Improvements in pre- and per-op-rative management of the very ill patient, and the use of allograft valves are likely to further improve long-term results. Finally, the presence of staphylococcal endocarditis requires long-term postoperative antibiotic therapy.     

Mitral valve aneurysm with infective endocarditis

A case of mitral valve aneurysm associated with infective endocarditis is reported. Two-dimensional echocardiography revealed a saccular structure in the anterior leaflet that bulged into the left atrium throughout the cardiac cycle. During operation, the vegetation on the commissure of the right and left aortic leaflet and a 3-mm perforation on the noncoronary leaflet were found. The mitral valve and aortic valve were replaced with mechanical prosthesis. Pathology of the excised valves showed inflammation. For this patient, we considered that the infected aortic regurgitant jet striking the ventricular surface of the anterior mitral leaflet could be the mechanism of the leaflet aneurysm.     

Latent infective endocarditis: epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients with unsuspected endocarditis detected after elective valve replacement

Background

The diagnosis of infective endocarditis is usually made on the basis of clinical and laboratory criteria and may be confirmed by histologic examination or culture of excised valves. We tried to determine the incidence and significance of inflammatory changes in valves excised during operations for reasons other than infective endocarditis.

Methods

The charts and histopathology of all patients undergoing valve replacement during a 10-year period (1993-2002) were reviewed. A total of 868 patients underwent a total of 970 valve replacements during this period, of whom 11 patients (1.3%) were for endocarditis, with the remaining 857 (98.7%) for other indications. All excised valves were cultured and examined histologically for the presence of inflammatory infiltrates, vegetations, and microorganisms.

Results

In 8 of 857 patients (0.9%), the histologic examination unexpectedly demonstrated an infiltrate suggestive of endocarditis. Blood and valve cultures, and serologic tests for Mycoplasma, Chlamydia, Legionella, Q fever, Brucella, Rickettsiae, VDRL, and Bartonella were negative in all but 1 patient, who was found to have Q fever. All received a prolonged course of antibiotics. Six patients had an uneventful recovery; 1 had intramyocardial abscesses and expired during cardiac reoperation; and 1 had recurrent fever and dehiscence of the aortic and mitral valve prostheses and after two cardiac reoperations remains in severe heart failure.

Conclusions

The presence of an unexpected inflammatory infiltrate in heart valves excised for reasons other than endocarditis may occur in 0.9% of such operations; these infiltrates could indicate presence of endocarditis. A microbial origin should be sought, and patients should receive empiric antibiotic treatment for endocarditis.     

Emergency valve replacement for active infective endocarditis

During the last 12 years, 14 patients were subjected to emergency heart valve replacement in acute bacterial endocarditis. Operative mortality was 21% (3/14); significant postoperative periprosthetic regurgitation or reinfection occurred in none of the survivors. Risk factors with unfavourable prognosis are: (1) virulent pathogens ("Non-Viridans"-germs); (2) previously normal heart valves; (3) acute aortic insufficiency with premature closure of the mitral valve; (4) floating vegetations shown by echocardiography. Our results provide further evidence for the efficacy of early surgical intervention in patients with bacterial endocarditis with an unfavourable etiology or a complicated course.     

Stentless aortic valves as an alternative to homografts for valve replacement in active infective endocarditis complicated by ring abscess

BACKGROUND: The valve substitute of choice in active infective aortic valve endocarditis complicated by annulus abscess in our institution is the cryopreserved homograft. To avoid implantation of any prosthetic material, the Shelhigh No-React stentless valves and conduits may be considered an alternative when no suitable homograft is available. METHODS: Between March 1986 and January 2001, 452 homografts were implanted in the aortic position. From January 2000 to August 2001, 75 Shelhigh No-React prostheses were implanted at our institution. In 25 consecutive patients (study group) with aortic annulus abscess, urgent aortic valve replacement with the Shelhigh SuperStentless and Stentless Aortic Valve Conduit was undertaken. Patients (16 male, 9 female; age, 49 +/- 19 years) were studied with follow-up until March 2002. The control group comprised 68 consecutive historical patients (46 male, 22 female; age, 53 +/- 14.4 years) with similar disease treated between January 1997 and December 1999 in whom an aortic homograft was implanted. This group was also followed up until March 2002. Demographic data and preoperative characteristics of the patients were without significant differences. Patients were studied by echocardiography. RESULTS: Sixty-day mortality was 16% (11 patients) in the control group compared with 12% (3 patients) in the study group. Recurrent infection occurred in 4% in both groups. The instantaneous and mean Doppler gradients yielded no significant differences (19.4 +/- 10.4 mm Hg and 11.8 +/- 5.7 mm Hg versus 18.2 +/- 8.7 mm Hg and 10.9 +/- 5.3 mm Hg, respectively). The mean effective orifice area calculated from Doppler flow velocity for the stentless valve was 2.3 +/- 0.6 cm2. Preoperative evaluation of left ventricular dimensions and global left ventricular systolic function did not vary significantly between the two groups. However, postoperatively evaluated left ventricular end-diastolic diameter dimensions in the study group were significantly smaller than those in the control group (47.6 +/- 7.9 mm versus 56 +/- 9.5 mm; p = 0.05). Ejection fraction was similar in both groups (56.2% +/- 12.8% for the study [Shelhigh] and 52.6% +/- 16.8% for the control [homograft] group). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience with both the Shelhigh No-React SuperStentless and Stentless Aortic Valve Conduit in patients with native or prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis appears to demonstrate good results, similar to those of cryopreserved homografts. Ease of implantation and favorable effective orifice area and pressure gradients, as well as the No-React anticalcification treatment, are promising factors.     

Early valve replacement in active infective endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is associated with a high mortality, but previous studies have suggested that the major complications of the condition might be prevented by early surgery. Of 50 patients treated for infective endocarditis at the Montreal Heart Institute from 1977 to 1982, 30 were treated nonsurgically and the remaining 20 underwent early valve replacement before preoperative antibiotic therapy was completed. Of these 20, 14 had native valve endocarditis and 6 prosthetic valve endocarditis. The organisms involved were Streptococcus sp in 11, Staphylococcus aureus in 2, gram-negative organisms in 3 and Candida parapsilosis in 1. Blood cultures remained negative in three patients. There were three early deaths (15%) following operation and one late death (5%). Infection on implanted prostheses did not recur, but reoperation was required in one patient because of prosthetic dehiscence 7 months after initial implantation. All resected valves displayed evidence of infection. Follow-up was obtained in all survivors. After an average follow-up of 26 months, 12 patients remained in functional class I and 4 in class II (New York Heart Association classification). Early valve replacement has resulted in improved survival of patients with infective endocarditis and is now associated with a low operative mortality and morbidity.     

Aortic root replacement with cryopreserved allograft for prosthetic valve endocarditis

BACKGROUND Our strategy has been to treat aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis (PVE) with radical debridement of infected tissue and aortic root replacement with a cryopreserved aortic allograft. This study examines the effectiveness of this strategy on hospital mortality and morbidity, recurrent endocarditis, and survival. METHODS: From 1988 through 2000, 103 patients with aortic PVE underwent root replacement with a cryopreserved aortic allograft. Abscesses were present in 78%, and aortoventricular discontinuity was present in 40%. Thirty-two patients had at least one previous operation for endocarditis. In 23 patients with a history of native valve endocarditis, the allograft was implanted after one episode (17 patients), two episodes (5 patients), or three episodes of PVE (1 patient). In the 80 patients without a history of native valve endocarditis, the allograft was placed after one previous aortic valve replacement (57 patients), two (19), or three (4) previous aortic valve replacements. Among the 92 patients with positive cultures, 52 had staphylococcal organisms, 20 had streptococcal, 6 had fungal, 4 had gram-negative, and 6 had enterococcal organisms. Mean follow-up was 4.3 +/- 2.9 years. RESULTS: Hospital mortality was 3.9%. Permanent pacemakers were required in 31 patients. Survival at 1 year, 2 years, 5 years, and 10 years was 90%, 86%, 73%, and 56%, respectively, with a risk of 5.3% per year after 6 months. Four patients underwent reoperation for recurrent PVE of the allograft (95% freedom from recurrent PVE at > or = 2 years). Risk of recurrent PVE peaked at 9 months and then declined to a low level by 18 months. CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of radical debridement and aortic root replacement with a cryopreserved aortic allograft for aortic PVE is safe, effective, and recommended.     

Aortic valve replacement for late infective endocarditis after heart-lung transplantation

Infective endocarditis is a rare but life-threatening complication of heart and heart-lung transplantation. We describe a 32-year-old woman who developed aortic valvular endocarditis following heart-lung transplantation. Enterococcus was the infective organism. The patient's condition was successfully managed using prolonged intravenous antibiotic therapy and aortic valve replacement.