Recurrent IgA nephropathy after renal transplantation despite immunosuppressive regimens with mycophenolate mofetil.

BACKGROUND: Transplantation offers an excellent option for patients with immunoglobulin-A nephropathy (IgAN) with severe renal dysfunction. However, IgAN frequently recurs in allografts treated with azathioprine. We examined the impact of mycophenolate mofetil immunosuppression on recurrence of IgAN. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of patients transplanted for IgAN at our institution in the cyclosporin era. Patients were excluded from further analysis if follow-up was <12 months or if immunosuppression at engraftment did not include azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Laboratory data, medications and allograft biopsy findings were compiled. RESULTS: 152 kidney transplantations met the study criteria. At engraftment, 61 allografts were treated with azathioprine and 91 with mycophenolate mofetil. By 3 years post-transplant, IgAN developed in six of 60 (10.0%) azathioprine-treated allografts and five of 62 (8.1%) mycophenolate mofetil-treated allografts (P = 0.76). Overall, 13 azathioprine-treated and seven mycophenolate mofetil-treated allografts showed recurrence. As expected in this retrospective study, the duration of observation was longer in the azathioprine group. The interval between engraftment and diagnosis of recurrent disease was also longer. Survival of allografts with recurrent IgAN was similar in the two groups. Survival of allografts with recurrent IgAN was worse than for allografts without recurrence or allografts transplanted into patients with non-IgAN renal failure. Neither switching azathioprine to mycophenolate mofetil nor using an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-II type 1 receptor blocker ameliorated the clinical course after a biopsy documented recurrent IgAN. CONCLUSIONS: Mycophenolate mofetil, compared with azathioprine, did not lessen the recurrence of IgAN or its clinical impact.     

Age-dependency of mycophenolate mofetil dosing in combination with tacrolimus after pediatric renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Dosing of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) must be lower in combination therapy with Tacrolimus (Tac) than with Cyclosporine. One study with mostly adolescent recipients recommended an MMF dose of 250 mg/m2 BID. Because this dose resulted in low area-under-the-curve (AUC) in our infant population, we retrospectively analyzed all available pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles in pediatric renal transplant patients on MMF plus Tac therapy to propose appropriate MMF dosing in pediatric patients of all ages. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-four PK profiles were performed in 27 patients (median age, 11.6 years; range, 1.8-20.7 years). The investigations were performed at a median of 299 days (range, 24-3424) after transplantation. Ten patients were converted to Tac plus MMF, all others received this as primary therapy. For patients with repeated measurements, we calculated the average AUC and doses. We used first-order PK modeling to calculate the doses for a mycophenolic acid (MPA) AUC of 60 ug*h/mL and a Tac AUC of 150 ng*h/mL. RESULTS: The mean Tac dose was 2.6 +/- 1.2 mg/m2/d or 0.086 +/- 0.038 mg/kg/d, resulting in an average AUC of 120.6 +/- 30.4 ng*h/mL. The MMF dose was not normally distributed; the median dose was 549 mg/m2/d (range, 146-1413) and the median MPA AUC was 49.8 ug*h/mL (range, 26.7-156.0). The mean dose for a Tac AUC of 150 ng*h/mL was 3.50 +/- 1.77 mg/m2/d (0.117 +/- 0.058 mg/kg) and was independent of age or time after transplantation. By contrast, we found a negative relationship between the dose per m2 (r2 = 0.29; P = 0.0038) or per kg (r2 = 0.58; P < .0001) required for an MPA AUC of 60 ug*h/mL and patient age. Converted and primary patients behaved identically. The dosing requirement decreased from 500 mg/m2 BID in 2-year-old patients to 250 mg/m2 in adolescents. There was substantial interpatient variability of 44%. CONCLUSIONS: Higher MMF doses are required for young children. Our data suggest a starting dose for infants of 500 mg/m2 BID, with PK monitoring of MPA due to substantial interpatient variability.     

Improved renal function after conversion from tacrolimus/sirolimus to tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on the potential nephrotoxicity of sirolimus (SRL) and tacrolimus (TAC) in combination. METHODS: We reviewed the course of 97 kidney transplant patients treated with SRL and reduced-dose TAC. Conversion from SRL to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was prescribed in a minority (n = 19) for various nonrenal side effects. We compared outcomes of converted patients to those remaining on TAC/SRL (n = 78). RESULTS: TAC levels were increased in converters (P = 0.009). Rejection rates were similar between groups over 18 months (21% vs. 16%, p = ns). Serum creatinine (Cr) and MDRD glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were similar between groups at nadir and six-months, but at 18 months the percent change from six-month Cr was +17% in non-converters vs. -10% in converters (P = 0.004 for the difference). The difference in GFR between groups at 18 months was also significant (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, only conversion to MMF was associated with a greater percent change in Cr from 6 to 18 months (P = 0.015). Conversion to MMF also correlated with higher GFR at 18 months independent of rejection, delayed graft function, and ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion from TAC/SRL to TAC/MMF led to improved renal function despite increased TAC exposure after conversion.     

Initial experience with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for renal rescue from cyclosporine nephrotoxicity after heart transplantation

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) have become the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens following heart transplantation, but their use is associated with nephrotoxicity. We evaluated a CNI elimination protocol in 14 patients with renal impairment at 48.3 +/- 36.0 months after heart transplantation. The mean serum creatinine was 321 +/- 107 micromol/L; cyclosporine (n=13) or tacrolimus (n=1) was discontinued with sirolimus commenced immediately, initially aiming for a target trough level of 16 (12 to 20) ng/mL. If patients were not receiving mycophenolate (MMF) this was initiated at 1 g bid. The transfer period was covered with a tapering course of corticosteroids. In addition to monitoring clinical status, hematology, biochemistry, and sirolimus levels, graft function was assessed by echocardiography, ECG, and, where indicated, endomyocardial biopsy. Renal function improved in 12 patients (with 6 having a greater than 40% decrease in serum creatinine), remained unchanged in 1, and deteriorated in 1. Two patients who were converted at 15 and 139 months after transplantation experienced grade 3A rejection. One patient experienced a fall in ejection fraction without histologic evidence of rejection. Sirolimus was discontinued in three patients because of side effects: bone marrow suppression, presumed lymphocytic pneumonitis, and generalized acneform rash complicated by an axillary abcess; 50% of patients continue on sirolimus. In conclusion, withdrawal of CNIs after heart transplantation resulted in an improvement in renal function in most patients: 43% experienced a substantial improvement. CNI elimination protocols need to be refined to reduce the risk of breakthrough rejection and to minimize side effects while protecting renal function after heart transplantation.     

Five-year results of renal transplantation on immunosuppressive triple therapy with mycophenolate mofetil

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) combined with cyclosporine and prednisolone significantly lowers acute rejection frequency in the early post-renal transplantation phase. To date only registry data with very high transplant numbers have shown that MMF significantly influences long-term outcome. A comparative retrospective analysis of the 5-yr results with MMF in a single transplant center was thus undertaken vs. other standard immunosuppressive regimens. The results of 1579 renal transplantations were grouped by treatment modality, subjected to Kaplan-Meier analysis, and compared using the log rank test. Both the total population and subgroups showed a non-significant trend towards better graft survival with MMF, evident at 2 yr and persisting for 5 yr. Extrapolation indicates that on combination therapy with MMF vs. azathioprine, approximately 10% more patients will be alive at 10 yr with a functional graft.     

Randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 6 months

BACKGROUND: This is the first report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. Results at 6 months of follow-up are presented. METHODS: Before transplantation, patients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The primary endpoint of the study was the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection. Patient and graft survival, renal function, and composite endpoints also were evaluated. Safety was assessed by monitoring laboratory parameters and adverse events. RESULTS: By 6 months of follow-up, the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection was similar in both treatment groups (13.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 11.4% tacrolimus+MMF; P=0.64 log-rank). Patient survival (97.3% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 97.7% tacrolimus+MMF) and graft survival (93.0% tacrolimus+sirolimus vs. 95.5% tacrolimus+MMF) were equivalent (P=0.53, overall survival log-rank). There was a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation in patients receiving sirolimus (21.1% vs. 10.8%; P=0.008). Renal function was significantly better in the MMF-treatment group (serum creatinine 1.44+/-0.45 mg/dL vs. 1.77+/-1.42 mg/dL; P=0.018). Hyperlipidemia was significantly more prevalent in the sirolimus-treatment group. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher in sirolimus-treated patients. There were significantly more leukopenia and gastrointestinal adverse events in the MMF-treatment group. The incidence of posttransplant diabetes mellitus was 7.6% in the sirolimus group and 7.7% in the MMF group. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus is equally effective in renal transplantation when combined with sirolimus or MMF. The tacrolimus-MMF combination may be superior in terms of improved renal function and improved cardiovascular risk factors including hyperlipidemia and hypertension.     

Oral ulcers in kidney transplant recipients treated with sirolimus and mycophenolate mofetil

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to reduce calcineurin inhibitor toxicity, transplant patients treated with tacrolimus can be switched to maintenance treatment with sirolimus. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, 33 kidney transplant recipients on steroid-free maintenance treatment with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil continued tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (control group, n=18) or were converted from tacrolimus to sirolimus (study group, n=15) at 1 year after transplantation. RESULTS: The study was prematurely stopped as a result of a cluster of nine patients suffering from painful oral ulcerations in the study group. Oral ulcerations did not occur in the control group. The authors here report on the individual cases suffering from this side effect of the instituted immunosuppressive regimen. CONCLUSIONS: The authors review the literature with respect to the occurrence of oral ulcers associated with the use of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil and speculate on the causes of the high incidence of oral ulcers in their study group. Possible explanations are overimmunosuppression during the period of the conversion from tacrolimus to sirolimus without antiviral prophylaxis, the use of the oral emulsion instead of tablets, or the lack of corticosteroid co-administration.     

Long-term mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in combination with calcineurin inhibitors for chronic renal dysfunction after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the first-line immunosuppressive agents administered after liver transplantation, but they cause renal impairment. Two recent randomized trials report cellular rejection and liver graft loss when mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy was used as a renal-sparing agent. Our experience with MMF in the same setting but with longer follow-up is described. METHODS: In 45 patients with serum creatinine more than 120 micromol/L or creatinine clearance less than 50 mL/min, 2 g MMF per day was administered (median 29 months, 1-49 months) either as monotherapy (with all other immunosuppression withdrawn in 1 month) in 16 patients (group I) or in combination with low-dose CNI (trough tacrolimus 相似文献   

The renal benefit of mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation

Haywood S, Abecassis M, Levitsky J. The renal benefit of mycophenolate mofetil after liver transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: E88–E95. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: The risk and benefit of adding mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to a standard immunosuppressive regimen at the time of liver transplantation (LT) is not well described. Methods: We performed a retrospective case–control analysis comparing one‐yr outcomes of all LT recipients at our institution treated with post‐operative tacrolimus (TAC), MMF, and steroids vs. TAC and steroids. Results: A total of 101 LT recipients (50:51 case:control) were analyzed. Despite more renal dysfunction at LT, the MMF + TAC group had similar serum creatinine (Cr) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) as the TAC group one‐yr post‐LT. In this time period, Cr decreased (1.57–1.22 mg/dL, p = 0.04) and GFR increased (57.5–65.1 mL/min per 1.73 m², p = 0.05) in the MMF + TAC group, while Cr increased (1.11–1.35, p < 0.01) and GFR declined (73.5–60.1, p < 0.001) in the TAC group. These findings occurred without a difference in absolute rejection episodes, hospitalizations, infections, deaths, or time to above events (p > 0.05). Subgroup analysis of patients stratified by pre‐transplant renal dysfunction (Cr ≥ 1.2 mg/dL) supported the previous. MMF was reasonably well tolerated with a low rate of discontinuation. Conclusions: The use of adjunctive MMF immediately after LT may protect against calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity, potentially without the need for dose reduction or increased risk of adverse events.     

Albuminuria after renal transplantation: maintenance with sirolimus/low-dose tacrolimus vs. mycophenolate mofetil/high-dose tacrolimus

Maintenance immunosuppression with sirolimus (SRL) in renal transplantation has been associated with proteinuria. We report long-term outcomes of kidney transplant recipients maintained on steroid-free regimens, either SRL with low-dose tacrolimus (SRL/L-Tac) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with high-dose tacrolimus (MMF/H-Tac). We conducted a case-matched study of 50 patients receiving MMF/H-Tac, matched 1:2 with 100 patients maintained on SRL/L-Tac. All patients were induced with rabbit antithymocyte globulin followed by early steroid withdrawal. Comparisons were made of patient and graft survival, graft function, acute rejection, and albuminuria. There were no significant differences between the SRL/L-Tac and MMF/H-Tac groups for patient survival, graft survival, occurrence of acute rejection, or graft function. There was no difference in the proportion of patients with albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR) ≥300 μg/mg (19% vs. 20%), but more patients in the SRL group were receiving renin-angiotensin system blocking agents (72% vs. 53%, p = 0.04). Only flushing the donor kidney with histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (vs. UW solution) was predictive of albuminuria. Long-term outcomes are similar at our center for kidney transplant patients receiving either SRL/L-Tac or MMF/H-Tac. Although the occurrence of albuminuria was not different, significantly more SRL-treated patients were receiving antiproteinuric medications.     

Conversion to sirolimus and mycophenolate can attenuate the progression of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and improves renal function after lung transplantation

BACKGROUND: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the major problem after lung and heart-lung transplantation (LTx/HLTx). Sirolimus (Sir) and Mycophenolate (MMF) showed a promising efficacy in the treatment of BOS in animal models. The first clinical experience in converting LTx/HLTx-recipients with BOS from calcineurin inhibitor-(CNI)-based immunosuppression to a Sir-MMF based immunosuppression is reported herein. METHODS: Six LTx- and five HLTx-recipients (eight men; 0.9 to 8 years after transplantation) with CNI-based immunosuppression (plus MMF) in whom BOS was diagnosed were included in the study. Mean patient age was 37+/-13 years (range 17-62 years). Sir was started with 6 mg and continued adjusted to according target trough levels (8-14 ng/ml). Subsequently, the CNIs were tapered down and finally stopped. Follow up included self determined pulmonary function tests, microbiological screening, chest radiographs, and laboratory studies RESULTS: Two acute rejection episodes occurred during the study period. The incidence of infection was 2.2+/-1.3 infections/patient-year after conversion. Mean FEV1 decreased after a mean follow up of 14.8+/-1.4 months: from 2.1+/-0.7 l prior conversion to 1.3+/-0.6l after conversion (P=0.03). However, graft function remained stable in three patients and progression of BOS slowed down in three patients. Overall, 2 of 10 patients died due to ongoing BOS while awaiting retransplantation CONCLUSIONS: After BOS was diagnosed, conversion to MMF and Sir stabilized graft function only in some of the converted patients. Therefore, earlier administration of Sir-based immunosuppression might be a more promising approach. Whether conversion to CNI-free immunosuppression can actually ameliorate the extent or progression of BOS has to be investigated in randomized trials.     

Use of basiliximab with mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation

INTRODUCTION: Randomized, placebo-controlled studies have determined that administration of basiliximab (chimeric IL-2 receptor antagonist) decreases the acute rejection rate in kidney transplantation when used in combination with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids. We report our experience using basiliximab with mycophenolate mofetil, a calcineurin inhibitor, and steroids in kidney transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 127 patients who received their first kidney transplant between September 1, 1998, and December 30, 2000, including 59 who received basiliximab (22 living and 37 cadaveric donor recipients) and the 68 that did not receive this antibody (31 living and 37 cadaveric donor recipients). The groups were demographically comparable for risk factors such as race, peak of panel-reactive antibody, delayed graft function, donor age, and cold ischemia time. The analysis assessed serum creatinine levels, acute rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease incidence as well as patient and graft survival at 6 months. RESULTS: Serum creatinine levels were 3 +/- 3.1 and 2.6 +/- 2.5 mg/dL (P =.346) at discharge, 1.5 +/- 0.6 and 1.7 +/- 1.1 mg/dL (P =.098) at 1 month, and 1.5 +/- 0.7 and 1.6 +/- 0.7 mg/dL (P =.454) at 6 months posttransplantation for patients treated with versus without basiliximab, respectively. Only one episode of acute rejection was seen among patients treated with basiliximab within 1 month posttransplantation versus three episodes among patients treated without basiliximab (P =.382). Three patients (5.1%) treated with basiliximab and two patients (2.9%) treated without basiliximab developed acute rejection within 6 months posttransplantation (P =.536). Patient and graft survivals at 6 months posttransplantation were not significantly different between patients treated with versus without basiliximab (100% and 100% versus 100% and 98.3%, respectively). There was no increased incidence of cytomegalovirus infection with the use of basiliximab (5.1% vs 5.9%, P =.844). There was only one case of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease within 6 months posttransplantation in a patient treated without basiliximab. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that the routine addition of basiliximab to a mycophenolate mofetil-based regimens does not appear to be warranted. A larger prospective randomized study with longer follow-up is needed to confirm these results.     

Long-term renal transplant function in recipient of simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant maintained with two prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive combinations: tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil versus tacrolimus/sirolimus

BACKGROUND: It is not known how different steroid-free immunosuppressive combinations affect long-term kidney transplant function in recipients of simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplant (SPK). Here, we sought to evaluate, in SPK recipients, the impact on long-term renal allograft function of two Tac-based prednisone-free maintenance immunosuppressive protocols: tacrolimus (Tac)/mycophonelate mofetil (MMF) versus Tac/ sirolimus (SRL). METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective, sequential study, we analyzed 59 SPK transplant patients with at median follow up of 5 years. All patients received induction therapy with thymoglobulin and maintenance immunosuppression with Tac/MMF (n=22) or Tac/SRL (n=37). There were no differences between the two groups in regards to age, gender, race, panel reactive antibodies, degree of mismatch, donor age, incidence of delay graft function, and Tac trough levels at different time points after transplantation. RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier patient survival at 6 years after transplantation was not statistically different between the two groups. Rate of ACR was similar. Kidney survival, even if not statistically significant, was better in the Tac/MMF group than in the Tac/SRL (90.7% vs. 70.7%, P=0.09). The slope of glomerular filtration rate decline per month at 5 years after transplantation was not statistically different between the two groups. Both groups had the same decline over time in glomerular filtration rate of 0.40+/-0.06 mL/min/1.73/month. Pancreas survival at 6 years after transplantation was 100% in both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that, in SPK recipients, long-term kidney allograft survival and function are not statistically different. A trend toward an increased rate of renal allograft loss was found in the Tac/SRL-treated group.     

A prospective, randomized trial of tacrolimus in combination with sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil in kidney transplantation: results at 1 year

BACKGROUND: This is the 1-year report of a randomized, multicenter, clinical trial comparing the combination of sirolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression in kidney transplantation. METHODS: Prior to transplantation, recipients were randomized to receive tacrolimus plus corticosteroids with either sirolimus (n=185) or MMF (n=176). The incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 6 months was the primary endpoint of the study. Patient and graft survival, renal function, study drug dosing and discontinuations were evaluated at 1 year. RESULTS: At 1 year, there was no difference in patient survival (95.7% sirolimus vs. 97.2% MMF; P=0.45) or graft survival (90.8% sirolimus vs. 94.3% MMF; P=0.22). Patients without delayed graft function (DGF) receiving MMF had significantly better graft survival (99% vs. 93%; P=0.01). Patients receiving a transplant from a live donor had a trend towards better graft survival with MMF as compared to sirolimus (98% vs. 91%; P=0.07). Patients receiving sirolimus had a significantly higher incidence of study drug discontinuation (26.5% vs. 14.8% MMF; P=0.006). Patients receiving MMF had significantly better renal function as shown by median serum creatinine levels (1.3 mg/dL vs. 1.5 mg/dL; P=0.03) and a trend towards higher calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), (58.4 ml/min vs. 54.3 ml/min; P=0.06). More patients in the sirolimus group had a serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, (20.4% vs. 11.0%; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus is safe and effective in live and deceased donor kidney transplantation when given in combination with sirolimus or MMF. Patient and graft survival were excellent in both arms. Renal function is superior for patients treated with tacrolimus + MMF combination.