Effect of ciclesonide and fluticasone on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Despite their proven efficacy in the treatment and prevention of asthma exacerbations, current inhaled corticosteroids carry safety concerns, especially adrenal suppression. Ciclesonide (hydrofluoroalkane propellant) is a novel inhaled corticosteroid with few, if any, clinical adverse events. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential effects of ciclesonide therapy on the dynamic cortisol response to sequential low- and high-dose cosyntropin stimulation in adults with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week study in adults with mild-to-moderate asthma. One hundred sixty-four patients were randomized and treated; 148 patients completed the study. Fluticasone propionate (chlorofluorocarbon propellant) was used as an active comparator. The doses administered were 320 microg of ciclesonide once daily, 320 microg of ciclesonide twice daily, and 440 microg of fluticasone propionate twice daily, all doses ex-actuator. RESULTS: For both ciclesonide groups, changes in mean low- and high-dose peak serum cortisol levels and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels corrected for creatinine were small vs baseline and comparable with placebo. For the fluticasone propionate group, significant reductions vs placebo in serum cortisol levels in response to high-dose cosyntropin stimulation and in 24-hour urinary free cortisol levels were observed. Oral candidiasis rates were 2.5% for 320-microg/d ciclesonide, 2.4% for 640-microg/d ciclesonide, and 22.0% for 880-microg/d fluticasone propionate. CONCLUSIONS: These findings confirm the safety of ciclesonide therapy, demonstrating that at doses up to 640 microg/d, the drug does not affect sensitive markers of adrenal function.     

Once-daily ciclesonide improves lung function and is well tolerated by patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are recommended as first-line therapy for persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of ciclesonide once daily in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma. METHODS: An integrated analysis of 2 identical, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trials was conducted. Patients (n = 1015; aged > or =12 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV1 of 60% to 85% of predicted value) were randomized to ciclesonide 80 microg (CIC80), 160 microg (CIC160), or 320 microg (CIC320), once daily (exactuator doses) in the morning or placebo for 12 weeks. RESULTS: All ciclesonide groups showed significant improvements from baseline to week 12 in FEV1 compared with the placebo group (CIC80, 0.12 L [P = .0007]; CIC160, 0.13 L [P = .0004]; and CIC320, 0.14 L [P < .0001]). Likewise, FEV1 percent predicted, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, 24-hour asthma symptom score, daily albuterol use, and nighttime awakenings were significantly improved in all ciclesonide groups compared with the placebo group. Overall ciclesonide safety profile and rates of oropharyngeal adverse events for all groups were low and similar to those of the placebo group. Fewer ciclesonide-treated patients exhibited asthma-aggravated adverse events, and fewer ciclesonide-treated patients discontinued the study for any reason or because of a lack of efficacy compared with those in the placebo group. No suppression of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal-axis function (as assessed by means of 24-hour urinary cortisol levels corrected for creatinine and peak serum cortisol levels after stimulation with low-dose [1 microg] cosyntropin) was observed with any dose of ciclesonide. CONCLUSIONS: In this integrated analysis, ciclesonide once daily administered in the morning is effective and well tolerated.     

Efficacy and safety of fluticasone propionate 250 microg administered once daily in patients with persistent asthma treated with or without inhaled corticosteroids.

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown fluticasone propionate (FP) 100, 200, and 500 microg administered once daily to be effective in the treatment of asthma. The efficacy of a once daily regimen of FP 250 microg has not been evaluated previously. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of inhaled FP 250 microg administered once daily in patients currently receiving inhaled short-acting beta-agonists (SABA) alone or inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). METHODS: In two separate studies, 408 patients in the SABA study and 401 patients in the ICS study were randomly assigned to receive FP 250 microg or placebo for 12 weeks through the Diskus device (GlaxoSmithKline, Research Triangle Park, NC) each morning. RESULTS: At the study endpoint, SABA patients treated with FP and placebo had mean increases in forced expiratory volume in 1 second from baseline of 0.23 +/- 0.03 L and 0.10 +/- 0.03 L, respectively (P < 0.001). ICS patients treated with FP had a mean increase of 0.08 +/- 0.02 L compared with a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of -0.08 +/- 0.03 L with placebo (P < 0.001). Changes of similar magnitude in morning peak expiratory flow rates were seen with FP in both the SABA and ICS studies. Fewer FP-treated ICS study patients were withdrawn from the study as a result of predetermined asthma stability criteria and, therefore, those patients had a greater probability of remaining in the study than placebo-treated patients (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: FP 250 microg, once daily, produced greater improvements in pulmonary function and asthma symptom control than placebo. This new treatment regimen provides clinicians with an additional therapeutic option for patients with asthma previously treated with either beta2-agonists alone or ICS.     

Anti-inflammatory effects of once daily low dose inhaled ciclesonide in mild to moderate asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND: Ciclesonide exhibits clinical efficacy at 160 microg (ex-actuator) once daily but the anti-inflammatory effects at this dose are not known. We wished to know whether 4 weeks therapy with ciclesonide pMDI 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibited significant anti-inflammatory effects. METHODS: Seventeen patients with mild persistent asthma (FEV(1) 3.35 l) were recruited into a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized crossover study. Measurements were made after ciclesonide and placebo treatment as well as after run-in and washout periods, for adenosine monophosphate (AMP) bronchial challenge (primary variable), exhaled nitric oxide (NO) and induced sputum (in a subgroup). RESULTS: The mean (SEM) AMP bronchial challenge PC(20) following ciclesonide (140 (63) mg/ml) was significantly (P < 0.001) increased compared with placebo (17 (8) mg/ml), run-in (13 (5) mg/ml) and washout (9 (3) mg/ml) periods. This amounted to an eightfold (CI: 5.3-12.0) for ciclesonide vs placebo. Likewise, there were significant improvements in exhaled NO levels and a significant reduction in induced sputum eosinophil cell counts. CONCLUSION: We have shown that inhaled ciclesonide given at 160 microg once daily in the morning exhibits significant anti-inflammatory effects that are in keeping with the previously described clinical effects.     

Long-term safety and efficacy of intranasal ciclesonide in adult and adolescent patients with perennial allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Ciclesonide is a corticosteroid in development for allergic rhinitis that has been shown to be safe and effective in seasonal allergic rhinitis and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) trials of up to 6 weeks in duration. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of ciclesonide are unknown. OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the long-term safety of intranasal ciclesonide, 200 microg once daily, in patients with PAR. METHODS: Patients (> or = 12 years old) with a 2-year or longer history of PAR were randomized in a double-blind fashion to receive ciclesonide, 200 microg, or placebo once daily in the morning for up to 52 weeks. Spontaneous and elicited adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Ear, nose, and throat examinations were performed to evaluate local tolerability. Additionally, 24-hour urinary free cortisol level, morning plasma cortisol level, intraocular pressure, and lens opacification were monitored to evaluate the systemic safety of intranasal ciclesonide. Ciclesonide efficacy was determined by measuring 24-hour reflective total nasal symptom scores. RESULTS: No clinically relevant differences were observed between the ciclesonide and placebo groups in adverse events, ear, nose, and throat examinations, or 24-hour urinary free or morning plasma cortisol levels. Similarly, no clinically relevant differences were found between treatment groups in intraocular pressure, visual acuity, or lens opacification. With regard to efficacy, ciclesonide achieved a significantly greater reduction in 24-hour reflective total nasal symptom score compared with placebo over more than 52 weeks (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In this study, intranasal ciclesonide, 200 microg once daily, was safe and effective for the long-term treatment of PAR, with no evidence of tachyphylaxis.     

Effectiveness of ciclesonide nasal spray in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Ciclesonide is an investigational corticosteroid under development for treatment of allergic rhinitis. Ciclesonide is converted to active metabolite, desisobutyryl-ciclesonide (des-CIC), by upper and lower airway esterases. In vitro studies in human nasal epithelial cells and bronchial epithelial cells have demonstrated a long duration of anti-inflammatory activity of des-CIC. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the dose-dependent efficacy and safety of a hypotonic intranasal formulation of ciclesonide in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). METHODS: This was a phase 2, randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Adults (n = approximately 145 per treatment group) with a minimum 2-year history of SAR received placebo or ciclesonide (25, 50, 100, or 200 microg/d) for 14 days. The primary end point was change in the sum of morning and evening reflective total nasal symptom scores (TNSSs) over 2 weeks. Safety was monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Ciclesonide, 100 microg/d (P = .04) and 200 microg/d (P = .003), significantly improved the sum of morning and evening reflective TNSS vs placebo at more than 2 weeks of treatment. Baseline values for morning and evening reflective TNSS ranged from 17.80 to 18.82 across treatment groups. The average change from baseline in reflective TNSS was -4.2 for placebo and -4.8, -4.8, -5.3, and -5.8 for ciclesonide, 25, 50, 100, and 200 microg/d, respectively. There were no dose-related differences in the incidence of adverse events among treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study indicate that 100-microg and 200-microg daily doses of ciclesonide are effective in the treatment of SAR. Ciclesonide, 200 microg/d, appears to be the optimal dose studied for reducing the symptoms of SAR while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.     

Efficacy and safety of ciclesonide, 200 microg once daily, for the treatment of perennial allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Ciclesonide is an intranasal corticosteroid approved for the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and quality-of-life benefits of intranasal ciclesonide, 200 microg once daily, for the treatment of perennial AR (PAR). METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adults and adolescents with at least a 2-year history of PAR received intranasal ciclesonide, 200 microg, or placebo once daily for 6 weeks. Patient-evaluated total nasal symptom scores (TNSSs), physician-assessed overall nasal signs and symptoms severity scores, and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores were evaluated. RESULTS: Patient baseline characteristics were similar in the ciclesonide (n = 238) and placebo (n = 233) groups and were consistent with moderate PAR severity. Ciclesonide therapy significantly reduced average morning and evening reflective TNSSs compared with placebo (P < .001) and significantly reduced average morning and evening instantaneous TNSSs (P = .001) over 6 weeks of treatment. At the end point, a greater decrease from baseline was observed in physician-assessed overall nasal signs and symptoms severity for the ciclesonide group compared with the placebo group (P = .051). An appreciable improvement in combined Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores at the end point was also observed in the ciclesonide group (P = .01 vs placebo). The frequency of adverse events was similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, intranasal ciclesonide treatment was associated with significant reductions in nasal symptoms and appreciable improvements in health-related quality of life in adult and adolescent patients with PAR. Ciclesonide was well tolerated, with a safety profile comparable with that of placebo.     

Effect of low-dose ciclesonide on allergen-induced responses in subjects with mild allergic asthma

BACKGROUND: Inhalation of allergens by sensitized patients with asthma induces reversible airway obstruction, airway hyperresponsiveness, and eosinophilic airway inflammation. Attenuation of allergen-induced bronchoconstriction and inflammation has been used to examine the efficacy of therapeutic agents such as inhaled corticosteroids in asthma. Ciclesonide, a nonhalogenated inhaled corticosteroid being developed for the treatment of persistent asthma, remains inactive until cleaved by esterases in the lung. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effect of low doses of inhaled ciclesonide, 40 microg and 80 microg, on allergen-induced bronchoconstriction, serum eosinophil cationic protein, and eosinophilic airway inflammation. METHODS: Twenty-one nonsmokers with mild atopic asthma completed a multicenter, randomized, 3-way crossover study comparing the effects of 7-day treatment of ciclesonide or placebo. Allergen-induced responses, including the early and late fall in FEV1, peripheral blood eosinophils, serum eosinophil cationic protein levels, and eosinophils in induced sputum were measured. RESULTS: Ciclesonide 80 microg attenuated the early and late asthmatic responses, including the change in FEV1, serum eosinophil cationic protein, and sputum eosinophils measured at 24 hours postchallenge (P < .025). Ciclesonide 40 microg attenuated the late asthmatic responses and sputum eosinophils measured at 24 hours postchallenge (P < .025), with no effect on the early allergen-induced bronchoconstriction, 24-hour FEV1, or serum eosinophil cationic protein levels (P < .025). CONCLUSION: With the exception of 24-hour postchallenge peripheral blood eosinophils, a low dose of ciclesonide, 80 microg, was effective in blocking all allergen-induced responses measured.     

Efficacy and safety of dry powder fluticasone propionate in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Flovent Diskus is a powder formulation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) delivered via a breath-actuated, multidose inhaler. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of dry powder FP administered once or twice daily (200 microg per day) to children with persistent asthma. METHODS: Twelve-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial with a 52-week, open-label extension. Children aged 4 to 11 were required to have pulmonary function 50% to 85% of predicted values. The population was stratified for baseline therapy (inhaled corticosteroid/cromolyn or bronchodilators only). After a 2-week placebo run-in, 242 patients received dry powder FP 200 microg each morning, dry powder FP 100 microg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks; 192 were rerandomized to the QD or BID regimen for an additional 52 weeks of open-label treatment. Primary endpoints were mean changes in FEV1 and morning PEF recorded at clinic visits. RESULTS: Both dry powder FP regimens significantly improved FEV1, evening PEF, and asthma symptoms at the double-blind phase endpoint (P < or = .017 compared with placebo). The BID regimen also significantly improved morning PEF and nighttime awakenings due to asthma (P < or = .005). Among patients previously treated with inhaled corticosteroids/cromolyn, improvements observed with the QD and BID regimens were similar. Patients switched from BID to open-label QD treatment showed additional improvements at week 52 generally comparable to patients who received the BID regimen during both phases. Fluticasone propionate was well tolerated for up to 64 weeks with few reports of drug-related adverse events or morning plasma cortisol abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: Once daily dosing of dry powder FP 200 microg is an effective and convenient alternative for children whose asthma is controlled with a more frequent dosing regimen of inhaled corticosteroids.     

Rapid onset of control with budesonide Turbuhaler in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide (Pulmicort) is an inhaled corticosteroid with high topical potency but low systemic activity. Turbuhaler is a novel breath-actuated, multi-dose, dry-powder inhaler. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of two different dose regimens of budesonide Turbuhaler, compared with placebo, in adult patients with mild-to-moderate asthma not well-controlled with bronchodilator therapy. METHODS: This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study compared the efficacy and safety of 200 microg and 400 microg of budesonide, administered twice daily via Turbuhaler, with placebo, in 273 adult patients (aged 19 to 70 years) with mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV1 67% of predicted normal), not well-controlled with bronchodilator therapy. Efficacy was assessed by pulmonary function tests and patient assessments of asthma symptom control. Safety was assessed in terms of adverse events, laboratory evaluations, and physical examinations. RESULTS: Two hundred and 400 microg of budesonide bid were significantly more effective than placebo at improving morning PEF (mean differences from placebo of 43.63 L/min and 40.10 L/min, respectively; P < .001) and FEV1 (mean differences from placebo of 0.44 L, and 0.50 L, respectively; P < .001) over the 12-week treatment period. Onset of action as assessed by morning PEF was within two days. Basal and stimulated plasma cortisol concentrations were not significantly affected by budesonide treatment compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of adults suffering from mild-to-moderate asthma with budesonide Turbuhaler is well tolerated and results in a rapid onset of asthma control which is maintained over time.     

Effects of treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in children with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (DPI) has been shown to effectively treat asthma in children. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI in the treatment of mild-to-moderate persistent asthma in children previously using inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs). METHODS: A 12-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study evaluated 2 dosing regimens of mometasone furoate DPI (100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily) in 296 children 4 to 11 years old with asthma previously using ICSs. The primary efficacy variable was the change in percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to end point. Secondary efficacy variables included absolute FEV1, forced expiratory flow between 25% and 75% forced vital capacity, morning and evening peak expiratory flow, asthma symptom scores, albuterol use, nocturnal awakenings, response to therapy, and health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Mean changes from baseline at end point in predicted FEV1 were 4.73 and 5.52 percentage points for mometasone furoate DPI, 100 microg every evening and 100 microg twice daily, respectively, the difference of which was not significant, and -1.77 percentage points for placebo (P < or = .002). Significant improvements in secondary efficacy variables were also observed for both mometasone furoate DPI treatments over placebo. Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated, and no significant differences were noted among the 3 treatment groups in adverse event reporting. CONCLUSIONS: Both mometasone furoate DPI doses were well tolerated and significantly improved lung function, maintained effective asthma control, and improved quality of life in children with asthma.     

Once-daily mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler in the treatment of patients with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Although inhaled glucocorticoids are recommended for all stages of persistent asthma, compliance with long-term therapy is often poor, leading to significant morbidity and mortality. A simplified, once-daily dosing regimen may foster improved compliance. Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily (AM) administration of mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler (MF DPI) 200 microg and 400 microg with placebo in patients with asthma previously maintained only on short-acting inhaled beta-adrenergic receptor agonists. Methods: This was a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study. The mean change from baseline to endpoint (last treatment visit) for FEV1 was the primary efficacy variable. Results: At endpoint, both doses of MF DPI were significantly more effective than placebo (P < or = .05) in improving FEV1. Based on morning peak expiratory flow rate, once-daily MF DPI 400 microg was more effective than placebo (P < or = .001) at endpoint. Both active treatments also demonstrated improvement at endpoint in asthma symptom scores, physician-evaluated response to therapy and use of rescue medication. Although both MF DPI dosages were efficacious, MF DPI 400 microg provided additional improvement in some measures of pulmonary function (eg, morning PEFR) when these agents were administered once daily in the morning. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated and treatment-related adverse events occurred at a similar incidence among the three treatment groups. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that once-daily (AM) MF DPI provides a convenient and effective treatment option for patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma.     

Efficacy and safety of roflumilast in the treatment of asthma.

BACKGROUND: The central role of chronic inflammation of the airways in asthma pathogenesis is supported by the efficacy of corticosteroids in controlling clinical symptoms. However, the search continues for potentially safer anti-inflammatory alternatives. Roflumilast is an oral, once-daily phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor with anti-inflammatory activity in preclinical models of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dose-ranging efficacy and safety of roflumilast in patients with mild-to-moderate asthma. METHODS: Patients (N = 693) were randomized in a double-blind, parallel-group, phase 2/3 study. After a 1- to 3-week placebo run-in period, patients (mean forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1], 73% of predicted) were randomized to receive 100, 250, or 500 microg of roflumilast once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in FEV1; secondary end points included change from baseline in morning and evening peak expiratory flow. RESULTS: Roflumilast use significantly increased FEV1 (P < .001 vs baseline). Improvements from baseline in FEV1 at the last visit were 260, 320, and 400 mL for the 100-, 250-, and 500-microg dose groups, respectively. Roflumilast, 500 microg, was superior to roflumilast, 100 microg, by 140 mL in improving FEV1 (P = .002). There were also significant improvements from baseline in morning and evening peak expiratory flow in all the dose groups (P < or = .006). Roflumilast was well tolerated at all doses tested. Most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity and transient. CONCLUSION: These results support the emerging role of roflumilast, 500 microg/d, in the treatment of asthma.     

Efficacy and safety of ciclesonide nasal spray for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND: Allergic rhinitis (AR), an inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, affects approximately 25% of adults and 40% of children in the United States. Ciclesonide nasal spray is a corticosteroid being developed as a hypotonic formulation for AR. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ciclesonide nasal spray in adult and adolescent patients with seasonal AR (SAR). METHODS: In this double-blind study patients (age, >or=12 years) were randomized to receive 200 microg of intranasal ciclesonide (n = 164) or placebo (n = 163) once daily for 28 days. The primary measure was morning and evening patient-assessed reflective total nasal symptom score (TNSS). Additionally, instantaneous TNSSs, physician-assessed overall nasal signs and symptoms severity, and the results of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire were evaluated. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. RESULTS: Ciclesonide significantly improved average morning and evening reflective and instantaneous TNSSs compared with placebo over days 1 to 14 (P < .001). Improvements were also noted over days 1 to 28 (P < .001) and over days 15 to 28 (P = .011). Ciclesonide was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Intranasal ciclesonide was superior to placebo in relieving nasal symptoms in adult and adolescent patients with SAR. These results confirm the dose range-finding study in patients with SAR and support the efficacy of ciclesonide in AR. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: In a clinical setting ciclesonide was shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of SAR in adolescent and adult patients.     

Fluticasone propionate/salmeterol combination provides more effective asthma control than low-dose inhaled corticosteroid plus montelukast

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a disease of chronic inflammation and bronchoconstriction. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) provide important anti-inflammatory treatment but may not provide optimal control of asthma when taken alone. Two therapeutic alternatives for enhanced asthma control are to substitute the combination of fluticasone propionate (FP) and salmeterol (FP/Salm Combo) through the Diskus inhaler or to add montelukast to existing ICS therapy. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and safety of FP/Salm Combo through the Diskus inhaler versus montelukast added to FP (FP + montelukast) in patients whose symptoms were suboptimally controlled with ICS therapy. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, 12-week study in 447 patients with asthma who were symptomatic at baseline while receiving low-dose FP. Patients were treated for 12 weeks with one of the following: (1) combination of FP 100 microg plus salmeterol 50 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler, or (2) FP 100 microg twice daily through the Diskus inhaler plus oral montelukast 10 mg once daily. RESULTS: FP/Salm Combo treatment provided better overall asthma control than FP + montelukast with significantly greater improvements in morning peak expiratory flow (+24.9 L/min vs +13.0 L/min, P <.001), evening peak expiratory flow (+18.9 L/min vs +9.6 L/min, P <.001), and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (+0.34 L vs +0.20 L, P <.001), as well as a change in the percentage of days with no albuterol use (+26.3% vs +19.1%, P =.032) and the shortness of breath symptom score (-0.56 vs -0.40, P =.017). The groups had comparable improvements in chest tightness, wheeze, and overall symptom scores. Asthma exacerbation rates were significantly lower (P =.031) in the FP/Salm Combo group (4 patients, 2%) than in the FP + montelukast group (13 patients, 6%). Adverse event profiles were comparable. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients on low-dose ICS therapy had significantly greater improvement in asthma control when switched to the FP/Salm Combo than when montelukast was added to ICS therapy.     

Comparison of once-daily to twice-daily treatment with mometasone furoate dry powder inhaler.

BACKGROUND: Once-daily dosing with an effective inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) would likely enhance compliance and, therefore, aid in the management of asthma. OBJECTIVE: Several once-daily dosing regimens of mometasone furoate (MF) administered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) were compared with a twice-daily dosing regimen in 286 patients with mild to moderate persistent asthma who were previously being treated with ICS. METHODS: During a 2-week open-label phase, patients received MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily. They were then randomized to continue MF-DPI, 200 microg twice-daily treatment or to receive MF-DPI, 200 microg once daily in the morning (AM), 200 microg once daily in the evening (PM), 400 microg once daily AM, or placebo as part of the 12-week, double-blind phase. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from the baseline to endpoint (last evaluable observation) for FEV1. RESULTS: Once-daily MF-DPI, 400 microg, AM maintained FEV1, and morning peak expiratory flow rate, FVC, FEF25%-75%, and asthma symptom scores, at levels similar to those for MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily and significantly better than placebo. Once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, PM was effective in maintaining pulmonary function, but was less effective on other efficacy measures. In comparison to the other MF-DPI groups, once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, AM was not as effective overall. The incidence of local adverse events, including oral candidiasis, was low with all dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily MF-DPI, 400 microg, AM was as effective as MF-DPI, 200 microg twice daily, whereas once-daily MF-DPI, 200 microg, was more effective when administered in the evening compared with morning, for patients receiving ICS therapy. Once-daily dosing offers an effective and convenient treatment that could aid compliance in the treatment of asthma.     

Effective control of asthma with hydrofluoroalkane flunisolide delivered as an extrafine aerosol in asthma patients.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled corticosteroids are established as maintenance therapy for persistent asthma. A new aerosol formulation of flunisolide delivers a small particle size by using a hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) propellant with a built-in spacer. OBJECTIVE: To compare efficacy and safety of two different flunisolide formulations, HFA and chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), with placebo treatment over a range of doses. METHODS: The multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisted of a 2-week, active run-in phase with CFC flunisolide 500 microg, twice daily, followed by 12 weeks of double-blind treatment with placebo, HFA flunisolide (85, 170, or 340 microg, twice daily), or CFC flunisolide (250, 500, or 1,000 microg, twice daily). Patients (N = 669) were nonsmokers, at least 12 years of age, with mild to moderate asthma who were being treated with inhaled corticosteroids. Outcome measures were change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow rate, as needed albuterol use, nocturnal awakenings, and asthma symptoms. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, patients receiving 170 microg, twice daily, and 340 microg, twice daily, of HFA flunisolide showed a significant (P < 0.01) improvement in percentage increase in FEV1 (12.22% at 170 microg, twice daily, and 14.69% at 340 microg, twice daily) compared with the placebo group (5.35%). At one-third the dose of CFC flunisolide, HFA flunisolide provided similar improvement in pulmonary function versus placebo. Both formulations demonstrated comparable linear dose dependency for the change from baseline in FEV1 without any evidence of cortisol suppression. Outcome values for all seven secondary efficacy measures were numerically superior in patients receiving HFA flunisolide compared with the CFC formulation. Both formulations seemed to be safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: HFA flunisolide provides comparable efficacy and safety at one-third the dose of CFC flunisolide.     

Mometasone furoate antagonizes AMP-induced bronchoconstriction in patients with mild asthma

BACKGROUND: Mometasone furoate (MF) is a new potent corticosteroid for use in treating asthma. OBJECTIVE: To test the lower range of the dose-response curve, effects of MF delivered by dry powder inhaler (DPI) on AMP-induced bronchoconstriction were compared with those of placebo. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled, 3-phase cross-over, single-center, double-blind study, 15 patients with mild asthma were randomized to three 2-week treatment phases (separated by 4-week washout phases) with MF DPI 50 microg twice daily, MF DPI 100 microg twice daily, or placebo. AMP challenge was performed before and at the end of each treatment phase. RESULTS: Thirteen patients completed all 3 phases and were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Treatment with MF DPI 50 microg twice daily or with MF DPI 100 microg twice daily significantly reduced the bronchoconstrictor response to AMP, displacing the dose-response curve to the right by 2.81 and 3.11 doubling dilutions, respectively, compared with placebo (P <.001). The improvement in FEV(1) over the 2-week treatment phase was significantly (P < or =.033) greater during treatment with MF DPI 50 microg or 100 microg twice daily than with placebo. Peak expiratory flow rate, wheezing scores, difficulty breathing scores, nocturnal awakenings requiring salbutamol, and puffs of salbutamol per day also indicated a greater improvement in respiratory function and symptoms of asthma with MF DPI 50 or 100 microg twice daily than with placebo. Both doses of MF DPI were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with low doses of MF DPI decreased airway responsiveness to AMP challenge and improved secondary measures of pulmonary function and asthma symptoms.     

Bronchodilator efficacy of indacaterol, a novel once-daily beta2-agonist, in patients with persistent asthma

BACKGROUND: Indacaterol is a novel once-daily inhaled beta2-agonist in development for the treatment of patients with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the bronchodilator efficacy of indacaterol in patients with persistent asthma. METHODS: Patients received a randomized sequence of single doses of indacaterol, 400 microg, via single-dose dry powder inhaler (SDDPI); indacaterol, 200 microg, via multidose dry powder inhaler (MDDPI); and placebo. At each visit, the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was recorded at a series of time points during a 24-hour period. RESULTS: Of 33 patients screened, 25 were randomized to treatment. Adjusted mean FEV1 was significantly higher (P < or = .005) for both indacaterol doses vs placebo at most time points. The first time points at which statistically significant treatment differences were observed for indacaterol and placebo in FEV1 were 0.17 L at 5 minutes after dosing for 400 microg of indacaterol (SDDPI) and 0.21 L at 10 minutes for 200 microg of indacaterol (MDDPI) (both P < .001 vs placebo). Differences relative to placebo at the final time point, 24 hours after dosing, were 0.29 L and 0.15 L for indacaterol, 400 microg and 200 microg, respectively (both P < or = .003 vs placebo). Overall, FEV1 was significantly higher for the 400-microg dose compared with the 200-microg dose from 15 minutes to 2 hours after dosing (P < or = .013) and from 5 hours onward (P < or = .022). Indacaterol was associated with good tolerability and safety. CONCLUSIONS: Indacaterol demonstrates sustained bronchodilator efficacy throughout the full 24-hour period, with a rapid onset of action and a good overall safety profile.     

Comparison of powder and aerosol formulations of salmeterol in the treatment of asthma.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of the aerosol metered-dose inhaler (MDI) formulation of salmeterol for asthma symptoms have been established. Recently, salmeterol has been introduced as a micronized powder formulation administered via a breath-activated multidose powder inhaler (Diskus). OBJECTIVE: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study involving 498 adolescents and adults with mild-to-moderate asthma was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of salmeterol powder 50 microg twice daily via Diskus, salmeterol aerosol 42 microg twice daily via MDI, and placebo. METHODS: Patients were randomized to one of the three treatment groups for 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by serial measurements of forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) over 12 hours, daily peak expiratory flow (PEF), self-rated asthma symptom scores, nighttime awakenings, and supplemental albuterol use. Safety of each treatment was evaluated by monitoring vital signs, electrocardiograms, Holter monitoring, and occurrence of adverse events. RESULTS: As compared with placebo, both salmeterol powder and aerosol produced significant improvement in FEV1 and PEF and decreased nighttime awakenings and supplemental albuterol use. There were no significant differences in the efficacy of the two salmeterol formulations. The magnitude of improvement in pulmonary function was undiminished over the 12-week study. Both formulations of salmeterol were well tolerated, with safety profiles not significantly different from placebo. CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicate that salmeterol, administered either as a powder 50 microg twice daily via Diskus or as an aerosol 42 microg twice daily via MDI, produces clinically significant and comparable improvement in pulmonary function and is well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.