Intraoperative temperature monitoring sites in infants and children and the effect of inspired gas warming on esophageal temperature

This study tested the hypotheses that 1) temperatures of "central" sites are similar in infants and children undergoing noncardiac surgery and 2) airway heating and humidification increases distal esophageal temperature. Twenty children were randomly assigned to receive 1) active airway humidification using an airway heater and humidifier set at 37 degrees C (N = 8), 2) passive airway humidification using a heat and moisture exchanger (N = 6), or 3) no airway humidification and/or heating (control, N = 6). There were no statistically significant differences between tympanic membrane, esophageal, rectal, and axillary temperatures. The temperatures of the peripheral skin surface (forearm and fingertip) were significantly lower than tympanic membrane temperature and significantly different from each other. Although esophageal and tympanic membrane temperatures in the entire group were similar, esophageal temperatures in patients receiving active and passive airway humidification were about 0.35 degrees C above tympanic temperatures after induction of anesthesia. In contrast, esophageal temperatures in patients without airway humidification were 0.25 degrees C below tympanic temperatures after induction of anesthesia. Esophageal-tympanic membrane temperature differences in the patients given active and passive humidification differed significantly from the corresponding sum in the control group at all times, but not from each other.     

Intraoperative warming therapies: a comparison of three devices.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of three commonly used intraoperative warming devices. DESIGN: A randomized, prospective clinical trial. SETTING: The surgical suite of a university medical center. PATIENTS: Twenty adult patients undergoing kidney transplantation for end-stage renal disease. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were assigned to one of four warming therapy groups: circulating-water blanket (40 degrees C), heated humidifier (40 degrees C), forced-air warmer (43 degrees C, blanket covering legs), or control (no extra warming). Intravenous fluids were warmed (37 degrees C), and fresh gas flow was 5 L/min for all groups. No passive heat and moisture exchangers were used. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The central temperature (tympanic membrane thermocouple) decreased approximately 1 degree C during the first hour of anesthesia in all groups. After three hours of anesthesia, the decrease in the tympanic membrane temperature from baseline (preinduction) was least in the forced-air warmer group (-0.5 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C), intermediate in the circulating-water blanket group (-1.2 degrees C +/- 0.4 degrees C), and greatest in the heated humidifier and control groups (-2.0 degrees C +/- 0.5 degrees C and -2.0 degrees C +/- 0.7 degrees C, respectively). Total cutaneous heat loss measured with distributed thermal flux transducers was approximately 35W (watts = joules/sec) less in the forced-air warmer group than in the others. Heat gain across the back from the circulating-water blanket was approximately 7W versus a loss of approximately 3W in patients lying on a standard foam mattress. CONCLUSION: The forced-air warmer applied to only a limited skin surface area transferred more heat and was clinically more effective (at maintaining central body temperature) than were the other devices. The characteristic early decrease in central temperature observed in all groups regardless of warming therapy is consistent with the theory of anesthetic-induced heat redistribution within the body.     

Passive and active inspired gas humidification in infants and children

The hypothesis that both active and passive airway humidification prevents hypothermia in infants and children, but that neither decreases the duration of postoperative recovery was tested. Twenty-seven ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients were studied who weighed between 5 and 30 kg, underwent superficial operations, were anesthetized with halothane and 70% N2O, and whose lungs were ventilated via a Rees modification of an Ayre's t-piece. The children were randomly assigned to receive active airway humidification and warming using an MR450 Servo airway heater and humidifier set at 37 degrees C (n = 10), passive airway humidification using the Humid-Vent 1 heat and moisture exchanger placed between the Ayre's t-piece and the endotracheal tube (n = 8), or no airway humidification and heating (control, n = 9). Distal tracheal and tympanic membrane temperatures and airway humidity were recorded during the first 90 min of surgery. Rectal temperature was measured during the postanesthetic recovery period. Relative humidity of inspired respiratory gases was approximately 30% in the control group and approximately 90% in the group given active airway humidification. Initial inspired humidity in the passive humidification group (50%) increased to approximately 80%, a level not significantly different from that in the active group after 80 min of anesthesia. Central body temperature increased 0.25 degrees C during active active airway humidification and heating, whereas temperature decreased 0.25 degrees C during passive humidification and 0.75 degrees C without airway humidification. Distal tracheal temperature was significantly higher in the groups given passive and active humidification than in the control group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Comparison of Two Different Temperature Maintenance Strategies during Open Abdominal Surgery: Upper Body Forced-air Warming versus Whole Body Water Garment

Background: A new system has been developed that circulates warm water through a whole body garment worn by the patient during surgery. In this study the authors compared two different strategies for the maintenance of intraoperative normothermia. One strategy used a new water garment warming system that permitted active warming of both the upper and lower extremities and the back. The other strategy used a single (upper body) forced-air warming system.

Methods: In this prospective, randomized study, 53 adult patients were enrolled in one of two intraoperative temperature management groups during open abdominal surgery with general anesthesia. The water-garment group (n = 25) received warming with a body temperature (rectal) set point of 36.8[degrees]C. The forced-air-warmer group (n = 28) received routine warming therapy using upper body forced-air warming system (set on high). The ambient temperature in the operating room was maintained constant at approximately 20[degrees]C. Rectal, distal esophageal, tympanic, forearm, and fingertip temperatures were recorded perioperatively and during 2 h after surgery. Extubated patients in both groups were assessed postoperatively for shivering, use of additional warming devices, and subjective thermal comfort.

Results: The mean rectal and esophageal temperatures at incision, 1 h after incision, at skin closure, and immediately postoperatively were significantly higher (0.4-0.6[degrees]C) in the group that received water-garment warming when compared with the group that received upper body forced-air warming. The calculated 95% confidence intervals for the above differences in core temperatures were 0.7-0.1, 0.8-0.2, 0.8-0.2, and 0.9-0.1, retrospectively. In addition, 14 and 7% of patients in the control upper body forced-air group remained hypothermic (< 35.5[degrees]C) 1 and 2 h after surgery, respectively. No core temperature less than 35.5[degrees]C was observed perioperatively in any of the patients from the water-garment group. A similar frequency of the thermal stress events (shivering, use of additional warming devices, subjective thermal discomfort) was observed after extubation in both groups during the 2 h after surgery.     

Effect of humidifying devices on the measurement of tidal volume by mechanical ventilators

Purpose We hypothesized that expiratory tidal volume was underestimated, because a heat-moisture exchanger traps the expired vapor. We, therefore, designed patient and bench studies to investigate the accuracy of tidal volume monitoring. Methods In a patient study, applying two humidifying systems (a heat-moisture exchanger and a heated humidifier) and two tidal volumes (12 and 6 ml·kg⁻¹) with a Servo ventilator 300, we recorded the displayed expiratory tidal volume and thoracic volume displacement, measured by respiratory inductive plethysmography. Temperature, relative humidity, and absolute humidity were measured at the airway opening and at the end of the expiratory limb. Using a model lung, we also tested three different ventilators (Puritan-Bennett 7200ae, Evita 4, and Servo ventilator 300) to investigate whether the effects of the heat-moisture exchanger and the heated humidifier on monitored tidal volume varied according to the brand of ventilator. Results With the use of the heat-moisture exchanger, the displayed expiratory tidal volume was significantly smaller, by 12%–14%, than that with the heated humidifier, although thoracic volume displacement was identical in the two systems. The temperature and absolute humidity at the end of the expiratory limb were significantly lower with the heat-moisture exchanger than with the heated humidifier. In the model lung study, we investigated the effects of different brands of ventilator on the expiratory tidal volume. A similar degree (8%–14%) of underestimation of tidal volume was observed with the heat-moisture exchanger, regardless of ventilator brand. Conclusion Monitored expiratory tidal volume was underestimated by approximately 10%, when using a heat-moisture exchanger.     

Effect of hygrophobic filter or heated humidifier on peroperative hypothermia]

A study was carried out to find out whether the use of a hygrophobic filter (Pall, Ultipor) or of a heated humidifier (Dr?ger, Aquapor) during surgery had any effect on a patient's intraoperative core temperature and thermal balance. Seventy-five ASA I or II patients scheduled for gynaecological surgery were randomly assigned to three groups: group A (n = 25), where no warming device was used; and two groups (n = 25 for each) where inhaled gases were humidified and heated with either a hygrophobic filter set up between the endotracheal tube and the Y-piece (group B) or a heated humidifier set to 100% saturation at a temperature of 41.5 degrees C (group C). The patients were all anaesthetised with the same technique (thiopentone 5 mg.kg-1, dextromoramide 0.03 mg.kg-1 and 0.1 mg.kg-1 of either pancuronium or vecuronium, followed by enflurane with nitrous oxide in oxygen); the perfused fluids were not heated. Room, tympanic, rectal, oesophageal and four skin (thorax, arm, leg, thigh) temperatures were measured with calibrated Exacon thermistances, on arrival in the operating theatre, during induction, every ten minutes for two hours, and then every twenty minutes for two hours more. Ramanathan's and Burton's formulae were used to calculate mean skin temperature and heat loss respectively. In the recovery room, patients were warmed up with an electric blanket. Shivering was ranked from "0" to "+ +". There were no differences between groups as far as age, drug doses, perfusion volumes and room temperature were concerned.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Preservation of humidity and heat of respiratory gases in spontaneously breathing, tracheostomized patients

Background : Ventilation with endotracheal intubation bypasses the upper airway and the normal heat and moisture exchanging process of inspired gases. A continuous loss of moisture and heat occurs and predisposes patients to serious airway damage. We therefore prospectively studied one heated humidifier system, one cold humidifier system and one heat and moisture exchanger in spontaneously breathing, tracheostomized intensive care unit patients to determine the ability to preserve patients' heat and water. Methods : Following a randomized order, 10 patients were spontaneously ventilated for 24-h periods with the Nam 35r? humidifier (Europe Medical, France, a cold water humidifier), the heat and moisture exchanger Trach-Ventr? (Gibeck, Sweden), and the Aerodyner? humidifer (Kendall, USA). In each patient, during the inspiration phase, the following measurements were performed: mean values of temperature and relative humidity of inspired gases. The absolute humidity was calculated. Values were obtained in each patients after 40 min and 24 h. Results : The Trach-Ventr? filter and the Aerodyner? humidifier had better humidification and thermic capacities than the Nam 35r? humidifier (P<0.001). With the Nam 35r? humidifier, no patient had temperature of inspired gas >29°C. Concerning absolute humidity of inspired gases, the Nam 35r? humidifier achieved a lower performance than the other two tested systems (P<0.001). Conclusion : In spontaneously breathing, tracheostomized intensive care unit patients, the Trach-Ventr? heat and moisture exchanger and the Aerodyner? heated system achieved satisfactorily preservation of heat and humidity of inspired gases.     

Effect of heated humidified gases on temperature drop after cardiopulmonary bypass

In an attempt to prevent the decrease in nasopharyngeal temperature (NPT) ("afterdrop") after cardiac surgery, 30 patients undergoing hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were randomly assigned to receive humidified heated inspired gases at 45 degrees C at the proximal end of the endotracheal tube (group I) or dry gases at room temperature (group II), from the time of termination of CPB. All patients received high flow rates on CPB during the rewarming period with the use of vasodilator drugs when necessary. Both groups were comparable with respect to total bypass time, rewarming time, and temperature at termination of CPB. In addition, the NPT was compared with the tympanic membrane temperature (TMT) in group I to assess the validity of the NPT under these conditions. The results indicate that heating and humidifying inspired gases do not prevent afterdrop and do not falsely increase the nasopharyngeal temperature. The reasons for the ineffectiveness of heated humidified gases may include a large heat deficit at termination of CPB despite a normal NPT, and the very small heat content of heated gases. Monitoring the temperature of a site that reflects the heat deficit, and a more complete rewarming during CPB are suggested as a better approach to the prevention of afterdrop.     

Maintenance of body temperature in elderly patients who have joint replacement surgery A comparison between the heat and moisture exchanger and heated humidifier

The effect of a heat and moisture exchanger on intra-operative aural canal (core) and mean skin temperatures was investigated in elderly patients who had elective total hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia with artificial ventilation of the lungs. Group 1 (n = 20) did not receive any form of artificial humidification while in group 2 (n = 20) a heat and moisture exchanger was inserted in the breathing system and in group 3 (n = 20) the inspired gases were humidified and warmed at 40 degrees C by means of a heated humidifier. Time of surgery, intravenous fluid administration and operating theatre temperature were standardised. Mean (SD) aural canal (core) temperature decreased significantly in groups 1 and 2 (p less than 0.001), while there was a fall of 0.3 degrees C (0.6) in group 3, which was not significant. Mean skin temperature decreased during anaesthesia and surgery in both groups 1 and 2 (p less than 0.05), while it increased in group 3. There was a significantly greater loss of body heat in groups 1 and 2 compared with group 3 intra-operatively (p less than 0.001). We conclude tha a heat and moisture exchanger did not prevent the decrease in intra-operative body temperature in elderly patients.     

Peroperative Hypothermia

Heat loss during anesthesia and operation and subsequent hypothermia will increase the postoperative oxygen demand and may endanger patients with restricted cardiopulmonary reserves. Forty patients scheduled for intra-abdominal aortic surgery and 40 patients scheduled for peripheral vascular surgery on the lower limbs were investigated using a warming blanket, humidified heated inspired anesthetic gases at 37-40 degrees C, or both these methods together. A fourth group of patients received no active warming. A warming blanket used alone gave no protection against hypothermia when compared with no active warming. In the abdominal surgical group, there was a steady fall in temperature throughout the operation if no warming method was employed. In this group the use of humidified, heated inspired gases was significantly better than no treatment after 2 h of anesthesia (P less than 0.05). The combination of humidified and heated inspired gases and a warming blanket gave significantly better heat preservation after 40 min (P less than 0.05). Patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery had similar but smaller drops in temperature with the different types of warming procedures employed. The differences in temperature between the intra-abdominal and extra-abdominal operations were statistically significant after 3 h (P less than 0.05).     

Efficacy of intraoperative heat administration by ventilation with warm humidified gases and an oesophageal warming system

We measured changes in body temperature in 12 hypothermic (mean aural temperature 34.4 (SD 1.0) degrees C) pigs during general anaesthesia with an open abdominal cavity and the effect of two warming systems: heating of inspired gases to 39 degrees C (intratracheal temperature) and oesophageal warming to 39 degrees C by a water perfused oesophageal heat exchanger. Each animal underwent both treatments and the control period in random sequence. Each condition was studied over 1 h. No additional protection against heat loss (drapes, blankets, i.v. fluids warming, etc.) was used. Anaesthesia, room temperature and relative humidity, amount and temperature of infusions and extension of exposed visceral surfaces were standardized. Mean decrease in body temperature was 1.0 (0.7) degree C (P < 0.005) without warming and 0.6 (0.2) degree C (P < 0.005) with heated inspired gases: this difference was not statistically significant. Oesophageal warming was very efficient as mean body temperature did not change significantly (-0.1 (0.2) degree C; ns).      

“Deep-forehead” temperature correlates well with blood temperature

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy and precision of "deep-forehead" temperature with rectal, esophageal, and tympanic membrane temperatures, compared with blood temperature. METHODS: We studied 41 ASA physical status 1 or 2 patients undergoing abdominal and thoracic surgery scheduled to require at least three hours. "Deep-forehead" temperature was measured using a Coretemp thermometer (Terumo, Tokyo, Japan). Blood temperature was measured with a thermistor of a pulmonary artery. Rectal, tympanic membrane, and distal esophageal temperatures were measured with thermocouples. All temperatures were recorded at 20 min intervals after the induction of anesthesia. We considered blood temperature as the reference value. Temperatures at the other four sites were compared with blood temperature using correlation, regression, and Bland and Altman analyses. We determined accuracy (mean difference between reference and test temperatures) and precision (standard deviation of the difference) of 0.5 degrees C to be clinically acceptable. RESULTS: "Deep-forehead" temperature correlated well with blood temperature as well as other temperatures, the determination coefficients (r2) being 0.85 in each case. The bias for the "deep-forehead" temperature was 0.0 degrees C, which was the same as tympanic membrane temperature and was smaller than rectal and esophageal temperatures. The standard deviation of the differences for the "deep-forehead" temperature was 0.3 degrees C, which was the same as rectal temperature. CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that the "deep-forehead" temperature has excellent accuracy and clinically sufficient precision as well as other three core temperatures, compared with blood temperature.     

Comparison of two different temperature maintenance strategies during open abdominal surgery: upper body forced-air warming versus whole body water garment

BACKGROUND: A new system has been developed that circulates warm water through a whole body garment worn by the patient during surgery. In this study the authors compared two different strategies for the maintenance of intraoperative normothermia. One strategy used a new water garment warming system that permitted active warming of both the upper and lower extremities and the back. The other strategy used a single (upper body) forced-air warming system. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized study, 53 adult patients were enrolled in one of two intraoperative temperature management groups during open abdominal surgery with general anesthesia. The water-garment group (n = 25) received warming with a body temperature (rectal) set point of 36.8 degrees C. The forced-air-warmer group (n = 28) received routine warming therapy using upper body forced-air warming system (set on high). The ambient temperature in the operating room was maintained constant at approximately 20 degrees C. Rectal, distal esophageal, tympanic, forearm, and fingertip temperatures were recorded perioperatively and during 2 h after surgery. Extubated patients in both groups were assessed postoperatively for shivering, use of additional warming devices, and subjective thermal comfort. RESULTS: The mean rectal and esophageal temperatures at incision, 1 h after incision, at skin closure, and immediately postoperatively were significantly higher (0.4-0.6 degrees C) in the group that received water-garment warming when compared with the group that received upper body forced-air warming. The calculated 95% confidence intervals for the above differences in core temperatures were 0.7-0.1, 0.8-0.2, 0.8-0.2, and 0.9-0.1, retrospectively. In addition, 14 and 7% of patients in the control upper body forced-air group remained hypothermic (< 35.5 degrees C) 1 and 2 h after surgery, respectively. No core temperature less than 35.5 degrees C was observed perioperatively in any of the patients from the water-garment group. A similar frequency of the thermal stress events (shivering, use of additional warming devices, subjective thermal discomfort) was observed after extubation in both groups during the 2 h after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The investigated water warming system, by virtue of its ability to deliver heat to a greater percentage of the body, results in better maintenance of intraoperative normothermia that does forced-air warming applied only to the upper extremities, as is common practice.     

Prevention of intraoperative hypothermia during abdominal surgery

Heat balance and core and skin temperatures were studied in 111 patients during abdominal surgery. In minor surgical procedures the effects of heating of inspired humidified gases (n = 23) and of a heating mattress (n = 21) were compared with the conditions in an unwarmed control group (n = 24). These two methods were about equally effective in preserving total body heat, although the major effect of the heating mattress was to conserve heat which had been redistributed to the surface, and such heat could subsequently be lost to the environment. During major abdominal surgery 18 unwarmed control patients were compared with patients (n = 25) provided with a heat supply. The combined measures of heated humidified inspired gases, a heating mattress, insulation by a heat-reflecting blanket, warming of all infusions and transfusions and a warm operating room were all needed to balance the great heat losses during the major surgical procedures. With such massive heat supply it was possible to prevent heat loss and a fall in core temperature.     

Preservation of humidity and heat of respiratory gases during anaesthesia - a laboratory investigation

Humidification and heating of anaesthetic gases are desirable to prevent respiratory tract damage and a fall in body temperature during operative procedures. Numerous studies on the humidity and temperature of inspiratory gases in different breathing systems for anaesthesia have been carried out, but comparisons are difficult since different methods have been used. In this laboratory set-up we studied a non-rebreathing system with and without humidifiers and a circle absorber system with low (0.5 l/min) or medium (5 l/min) fresh gas flows regarding their ability to heat and humidify anaesthetic gases. The humidity of inspired gases was acceptable in the non-rebreathing system using either a Bennett Cascade humidifier or disposable humidifiers and in the circle absorber system using a fresh gas flow of 5 l/min or less. The temperature of the inspired gases was highest with the Bennett Cascade humidifier, followed by the low-flow circle system. The circle absorber system used with low fresh gas flow gave higher inspiratory gas temperature and humidity than the non-rebreathing system with a good disposable humidifier.     

Heat conservation during abdominal surgery]

Intraoperative hypothermia is a major problem in anesthetic management. We compared the heat conserving effect of a forced air warming system (Bair Hugger, Augustine Medical Inc.) with that of a warming blanket. Sixteen patients undergoing abdominal surgery were studied. Patients were anesthetized with nitrous oxide and oxygen combined with epidural anesthesia. Patients received tympanic, rectal, bladder and core temperature monitorings. Patients were divided randomly to Bair Hugger group (BH, n = 8) or warming blanket group (WB, n = 8). Temperature were measured every one hour over three hours. The BH group showed significantly higher temperatures than WB group. Bair Hugger system is an efficient way to maintain intraoperative body temperature.     

Oesophageal, rectal, axillary, tympanic and pulmonary artery temperatures during cardiac surgery

Purpose

The gradient between temperatures measured at different body sites is not constant; one factor which will change this gradient is rapid changes in body temperature. Measurement of this gradient was done in patients undergoing rapid changes in body temperature to establish the best site to measure temperature and to compare two brands of commercial tympanic thermometers.

Method

A total of 228 sets of temperatures were measured from probes in the oesophagus, rectum, and axilla and from two brands of tympanic thermometer and compared with pulmonary artery (PA) temperature in 18 adults during cardiac surgery.

Results

Measurements from the oesophageal site was closest to PA readings (mean difference 0.0 ± 0.5°C) compared with IVAC tympanic thermometer (mean difference ?0.3 ± 0.5°C), Genius tympanic thermometer (mean difference ?0.4 ± 0.5°C), axillary (mean difference 0.2 ± 1.0dgC) and rectal (mean difference ?0.4 ± 1,0°C) readings. When data during cooling were analysed separately, all sites had similar gradients from PA except for rectal, which was larger. On rewarming, oesophageal readings were closest to PA readings; tympanic readings were closer to PA than were rectal or axillary readings. Readings from the two brands of tympanic thermometer were equivalent.

Conclusion

Oesophageal temperature is more accurate and will reflect rapid changes in body temperature better than tympanic, axillary, or rectal temperature. When oesophageal temperature cannot be measured, tympanic temperature done by a trained operator should become the reading of choice.     

Monitoring and thermal management

Anaesthesia alters normal thermoregulatory control of the body, usually leading to perioperative hypothermia. Hypothermia is associated with a large number of serious complications. To assess perianaesthetic hypothermia, core temperature should be monitored vigorously. Pulmonary artery, tympanic membrane, distal oesophageal or nasopharyngeal temperatures reflect core temperature reliably. Core temperatures can be often estimated with reasonable accuracy using oral, axillary and bladder temperatures, except during extreme thermal perturbations. The body site for measurements should be chosen according to the surgical procedure. Unless hypothermia is specifically indicated, efforts should be made to maintain intraoperative core temperatures above 36 °C. Forced air is the most effective, commonly available, non-invasive warming method. Resistive heating electrical blankets and circulating water garment systems are an equally effective alternative. Intravenous fluid warming is also helpful when large volumes are required.In some patients, induction of mild therapeutic hypothermia may become an issue for the future. Recent studies indicate that patients suffering from neurological disease may profit from rapid core cooling.     

Comparison of forced-air warming and electric heating pad for maintenance of body temperature during total knee replacement

We conducted a randomised controlled trial to compare the efficacy of forced-air warming (Bair Hugger(trade mark), Augustine Medical model 500/OR, Prairie, MN) with that of an electric heating pad (Operatherm 202, KanMed, Sweden) for maintenance of intra-operative body temperature in 60 patients undergoing total knee replacement under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. Intra-operative tympanic and rectal temperatures and verbal analogue score for thermal comfort were recorded. There were no differences in any measurements between the two groups, with mean (SD) final rectal temperatures of 36.8 (0.4) degrees C with forced-air warming and 36.9 (0.4) degrees C with the electric pad. The heating pad is as effective as forced-air warming for maintenance of intra-operative body temperature.     

Core temperature monitoring with new ventilatory devices

Widespread use of new airway devices, such as the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), preclude measuring core temperature in the distal esophagus. Therefore, we tested the hypothesis that core temperature measured with a thermocouple positioned on a LMA or COPA is sufficiently accurate and precise for clinical use. Temperatures were recorded from thermocouples positioned on the cuffs of LMAs or COPAs in 36 patients scheduled for prolonged orthopedic surgery or therapeutic hyperthermia for cancer. These temperatures, recorded at 15-min intervals, were compared with simultaneously obtained nasopharynx and tympanic membrane temperatures. Data were compared by linear regression and the bias calculated. Temperatures measured on the LMA correlated well with both nasopharyngeal (r(2) = 0.94) and tympanic membrane (r(2) = 0.94) temperatures. Temperatures measured on the COPA also correlated well with those on the nasopharynx (r(2) = 0.97) and tympanic membrane (r(2) = 0.96). The fraction of temperatures that differed from nasopharynx temperature by more than +/-0.5 degrees C was 8% with LMA and 11% with COPA; the fraction of temperatures that differed from tympanic temperature by more than +/-0.5 degrees C was 7% with LMA and 10% with COPA. These results suggest that body temperature measured from the cuffs of COPA or LMAs is sufficiently accurate for routine clinical use. IMPLICATIONS: Temperatures measured on airway devices correlated well with independent measurements of core body temperature. Thus, body temperature measured on the cuffs of airway devices is sufficiently accurate for routine use.