Comparison of clinical prediction rules for management of pharyngitis in settings with limited resources

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of several clinical prediction rules for culture-positive streptococcal pharyngitis in a single group of patients in a setting in which clinicians routinely treat all cases of pharyngitis presumptively, without laboratory data. STUDY DESIGN: A MEDLINE search identified clinical prediction rules for streptococcal pharyngitis in children. Each rule was applied analytically to data from 410 children in Cairo, Egypt with clinical pharyngitis, in whom throat cultures were performed. The diagnostic effectiveness of these rules for predicting a positive culture were assessed and compared. RESULTS: Seven prediction rules were identified. Of these 7 rules, 4 were developed in North American children, 1 was recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO), and 2 were developed in Egypt. In the Cairo children, the WHO rule was the least sensitive, at 12%. The 6 other rules had sensitivities ranging from 81% to 99% and specificities ranging from 4% to 40%; 2 rules seemed to be effective, with diagnostic odds ratios of 5.2 and 6.1. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction rules demonstrated variable diagnostic effectiveness in the Egyptian children. Without laboratory testing, 2 clinical rules detected > 90% of cases of pharyngitis with positive culture for group A streptococcus and reduced overtreatment of culture-negative cases by approximately 40%. Selected clinical prediction rules have useful characteristics in settings of limited resources and need further validation.     

The influence of pulmonary function testing on the management of asthma in children

OBJECTIVE: To assess how often in a single encounter that pulmonary function tests (PFTs) influenced management decisions in children with asthma, beyond what was obtained from history and physical examination alone. STUDY DESIGN: Children with asthma (n = 367, age 4 to 18 years) performed spirometry before clinical evaluation. Physicians and nurse practitioners in the outpatient pulmonary office evaluated the children and made initial treatment recommendations before reviewing the spirometry results. Any changes based on the test results were documented. RESULTS: Spirometry was abnormal in 45% of the visits, related to underlying asthma severity but not to clinical findings. PFT results changed management decisions in 15% of visits. This frequency was not affected by the patient's age, disease severity, symptom control, or exam findings. When spirometry did not change treatment decisions, the provider was more likely to maintain therapy (58%) than to increase (17%) or decrease (24%) therapy. In contrast, when spirometry did change treatment decisions, the provider was more likely to increase therapy (75%) than to maintain (20%) or decrease (5%) therapy. CONCLUSION: Without PFTs, providers often overestimated the degree of asthma control. This incorrect assessment could have resulted in suboptimal therapy.