A new synthetic dialyzer with advanced permselectivity for enhanced low-molecular weight protein removal

Optimizing solute removal at minimized albumin loss is a major goal of dialyzer engineering. In a prospective, randomized, crossover study on eight patients (age 63 +/- 14 years) on maintenance hemodialysis, the new Baxter Xenium 170 high-flux dialyzer (BX), which contains a 1.7-m(2) PUREMA H dialysis membrane, was compared with two widely used reference high-flux dialyzers currently available for hemodialysis in North America, the Fresenius Optiflux 180 NR (FO) and the Gambro Polyflux 170 H (GP). Solute removal and biocompatibility were assessed in hemodialysis for 240 min at blood and dialysate flow rates of 300 and 500 mL/min, respectively. Additional ex vivo experiments detecting the interleukin-1beta (IL-1b) generation in recirculated donor blood were performed to demonstrate the pyrogen retention properties of the dialyzers. The instantaneous plasma clearances were similar for the three dialyzers except for cystatin c (cysc), for which a lower clearance was measured with FO as compared with BX and GP after 30 and 180 min of hemodialysis. The reduction ratios (RRs) corrected for the hemoconcentration of beta(2)-microglobulin and cysc were lower in FO (44 +/- 9 and 35 +/- 9%, respectively) versus BX (62 +/- 6 and 59 +/- 7%, respectively) and GP (61 +/- 7 and 56 +/- 8%, respectively). The RRs of the cytokine tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-6 were not different between the dialyzers. The albumin loss was <300 mg for all filters. No differences between the dialyzers were found in the biocompatibility parameters showing very low leukocyte and complement activation. The ex vivo recirculation experiments revealed a significantly higher IL-1b generation for GP (710 +/- 585 pg/mL) versus BX (317 +/- 211 pg/mL) and FO (151 +/- 38 pg/mL). BX is characterized by a steep solute sieving profile with high low-molecular weight protein removal at virtually no albumin loss and an excellent biocompatibility. This improved performance may be regarded as a contribution to optimal dialysis therapy.     

The effects of reprocessing cuprophane and polysulfone dialyzers on beta 2-microglobulin removal from hemodialysis patients

To further define the relationship between dialyzer reuse and the removal of beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) during dialysis, 26 patients who received hemodialysis were studied. Thirteen patients were dialyzed with conventional cuprophane dialyzers, and thirteen patients were dialyzed with high-flux polysulfone dialyzers. Patients in each group were dialyzed with only new dialyzers during the primary-use phase of the study, and reprocessed dialyzers during the reuse phase. Dialyzers were used six times during the reuse phase. Serum beta 2M levels were measured both predialysis and postdialysis, and adjusted for fluid loss. Dialysis with conventional cuprophane new dialyzers during the primary-use phase of the study resulted in a 3.3% increase in serum beta 2M levels, and a 2.4% increase in serum beta 2M levels during the reuse phase. The difference in the change of the concentration of beta 2M between primary-use and reuse phases was not statistically significant. Dialysis with high-flux polysulfone new dialyzers during the primary-use phase was associated with a decrease of 59.5% in the mean postdialysis concentration of serum beta 2M compared with the predialysis level. A corresponding decrease of 62.6% in serum beta 2M levels was observed after dialysis with high-flux polysulfone reprocessed dialyzers during the reuse phase. These data show no evidence of an adverse effect on the clearance of beta 2M during dialysis from the reuse of dialyzers up to six times. The results confirm previous studies that have reported that high-flux dialysis with polysulfone dialyzers removes substantial amounts of beta 2M, and dialysis with conventional cuprophane dialyzers does not.     

Impact of bleach cleaning on the performance of dialyzers with polysulfone membranes processed for reuse using peracetic Acid

Dialyzer performance may change with reuse depending on whether or not the dialyzer is cleaned with bleach. Bleach is usually used in conjunction with formaldehyde as the germicide. Because few data are available for dialyzers cleaned with bleach and disinfected with peracetic acid, we examined dialyzer performance in a cross-over study of dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes reprocessed using bleach and peracetic acid or peracetic acid alone. Each dialyzer was used for a total of 16 treatments, or until it failed standard criteria for continued use. Urea, beta2-microglobulin, and albumin removal were determined during the first, second, seventh, and 16th use of each dialyzer. Urea removal did not differ between the two reprocessing methods and did not change with reuse. Overall, beta2-microglobulin removal remained unchanged in dialyzers reprocessed with peracetic acid alone, but tended to increase after the seventh use in dialyzers reprocessed with bleach and peracetic acid. Approximately 60% of beta2-microglobulin removal resulted from trapping of beta2-microglobulin at the dialyzer membrane. Albumin loss into the dialysate was clinically insignificant throughout the study with both reprocessing methods. These data show that the clearance of both small and large molecules by dialyzers containing polysulfone membranes is well maintained by reprocessing with peracetic acid and that additional cleaning with bleach has limited impact on performance.     

Clinical cross-over comparison of mid-dilution hemodiafiltration using a novel dialyzer concept and post-dilution hemodiafiltration

BACKGROUND: Several studies have indicated that the improved elimination of middle molecules by convective renal replacement procedures might be associated with a better outcome in end-stage renal disease (ESRD). On-line mid-dilution hemodiafiltration (HDF) with the Nephros OLpur MD 190 hemodiafilter represents a novel extracorporeal renal replacement therapy concept to increase the removal of middle molecules. METHODS: In a prospective cross-over study in 10 ESRD patients, this technique was compared to on-line post-dilution HDF with a conventional synthetic high-flux dialyzer, operated at its technical limit, concerning small and middle molecular solute removal. Each patient was treated 3 times for 4.0 +/- 0.4 hours with both filters. Blood flow was 400 mL/min, substitution flow (Q(S)) during mid-dilution HDF 200 mL/min, and during post-dilution HDF 100 mL/min, and effective dialysate flow of 700 - Q(S) mL/min. Instantaneous clearances, reduction ratios (RR), and middle molecule mass transfer in continuously collected dialysate were determined. RESULTS: While urea and creatinine clearances were significantly lower (6.4% and 3.9%, respectively), middle molecule removal was much more efficient in mid-dilution HDF over the whole range of investigated proteins: compared to post-dilution HDF, beta(2)-microglobulin (11.8 kD) clearance (165.8 +/- 26.59 vs. 201.9 +/- 20.63 mL/min; P < 0.001), RR (80.0 +/- 5.4% vs. 82.2 +/- 5.7%; P < 0.001), and dialysate mass transfer (53% higher; P < 0.001) were significantly higher. For the larger middle molecules, cystatin C (13.4 kD) and retinol-binding protein (21.2 kD), mid-dilution HDF resulted in an even more superior performance, indicated by significantly higher values of all investigated parameters. CONCLUSION: On-line mid-dilution HDF with the Nephros OLpur MD 190 hemodiafilter appears to be a true technologic step ahead in terms of improved middle molecule removal. This efficient procedure gives hope to play a role in preventing or at least retarding dialysis-related long-term complications, such as beta(2)m amyloidosis, in ESRD patients, and may contribute to a more adequate dialysis therapy.     

Effect of beta(2)-microglobulin adsorption column on dialysis-related amyloidosis

BACKGROUND: beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m) is considered a major pathogenic factor in dialysis-related amyloidosis (DRA), often seen in long-term dialysis patients. No effective therapy for this severely debilitating disease is currently available. Lixelle, an adsorption column, has been developed for the elimination of beta2-m; the efficacy of this column has been evaluated in this study. METHODS: Seventeen hemodialysis patients with DRA were first treated with high-flux dialysis for a minimum of 1 year. This was followed by 1-year treatment with Lixelle column connected in series to the high-flux dialyzer. Treatments were used three times a week for both phases of this study. During the study period, beta2-m, pinch strength, motor terminal latency, and activities of daily living were evaluated. RESULTS: After 1-year treatment with high-flux dialysis the beta2-m level remained unchanged; however, after 1-year treatment with the addition of the Lixelle column, beta2-m level decreased significantly from 34.5 +/- 8.4 mg/L to 28.8 +/- 7.3 mg/L (P < 0.05). After 1 year of Lixelle column use, the pinch strength increased from 6.8 +/- 4.7 pounds to 9.1 +/- 5.5 pounds (P < 0.01), and the median motor terminal latency was significantly reduced from 5.1 +/- 1.0 mseconds to 4.5 +/- 1.1 mseconds. A significant improvement was also observed in the activities of daily living score of the upper extremities. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that the addition of Lixelle to the high-flux dialyzer is associated with a significant clinical improvement in DRA patients.     

High‐permeability alternatives to current dialyzers performing both high‐flux hemodialysis and postdilution online hemodiafiltration

Most high‐flux dialyzers can be used in both hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (OL‐HDF). However, some of these dialyzers have higher permeability and should not be prescribed for OL‐HDF to avoid high albumin losses. The aim of this study was to compare the safety and efficacy of a currently used dialyzer in HD and OL‐HDF with those of several other high permeability dialyzers which should only be used in HD. A prospective, single‐center study was carried out in 21 patients. Each patient underwent 5 dialysis sessions with routine dialysis parameters: 2 sessions with Helixone (HD and postdilution OL‐HDF) and 1 session each with steam sterilized polyphenylene, polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and medium cut‐off (MCO) dialyzers in HD treatment. The removal ratios (RR) of urea, creatinine, ß₂‐microglobulin, myoglobin, prolactin, α₁‐microglobulin, α₁‐acid glycoprotein, and albumin were compared intraindividually. A proportional part of the dialysate was collected to quantify the loss of various solutes, including albumin. Urea and creatinine RRs with the Helixone‐HDF and MCO dialyzers were higher than with the other 3 dialyzers in HD. The β₂‐microglobulin, myoglobin and prolactin RRs with Helixone‐HDF treatment were significantly higher than those obtained with all 4 dialyzers in HD treatment. The β₂‐microglobulin value obtained with the MCO dialyzer was also higher than that obtained with the other 3 dialyzers in HD treatment. The myoglobin RR with MCO was higher than those obtained with Helixone and PMMA in HD treatment. The prolactin RR with Helixone‐HD was significantly lower than those obtained in the other 4 study sessions. The α₁‐microglobulin and α₁‐ acid glycoprotein RRs with Helixone‐HDF were significantly higher than those obtained with Helixone and PMMA in HD treatment. The albumin loss varied from 0.54 g with Helixone‐HD to 3.3 g with polyphenylene. The global removal score values ((Urea_RR + β₂‐microglobulin_RR + myoglobin_RR + prolactin_RR + α₁‐microglobulin_RR + α₁‐acid glycoprotein_RR – albumin_RR)/6) were 43.7% with Helixone‐HD, 47.7% with PMMA, 54% with polyphenylene, 54.8% with MCO and 59.6% with Helixone‐HDF, with significant differences. In conclusion, this study confirms the superiority of OL‐HDF over HD with the high‐flux dialyzers that allow both treatments. Although new dialyzers with high permeability can only be used in HD, they are in an intermediate position and some are very close to OL‐HDF.     

Hemodiafiltration--a new treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in hemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Hemodiafiltration is used to increase the convective transport and thereby the elimination of small and middle molecules, mainly beta2-microglobulin (beta2-M) across the dialysis membranes. There is little information concerning urea, creatinine, beta2-M and principally phosphate kinetics during hemodiafiltration in vivo. In this prospective study, we evaluated the transmembrane solute mass removal (TSR) and clearance (Kd) of urea, creatinine and phosphate as well as serum beta2-M reduction rate (beta2-MRR) and collected beta2-M in dialysate plus ultrafiltrate during high-flux hemodialysis (HD) and post-dilutional hemodiafiltration (HDF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: 16 patients were studied using a polysulfone capillary filter (1.6 m2 surface area, 40 microm fiber internal diameter and 200 microm, wall thickness) during 2 one-week periods: first week HD 1.6 m2 and second week HDF 1.6 m2. Treatment time was 4 hours, blood flow rate 300 ml/min with constant dialysate and ultrafiltration rates for HD and HDF periods. TSR, Kd, beta2-MRR and beta2-M collection were assessed during the mid-week treatment. In a second part of the study, we repeated the same protocol using a second high-flux polysulfone capillary filter (2.4 m2 surface area, 30 microm fiber diameter and 150 microm wall thickness). RESULTS: TSR and Kd of urea and creatinine were not improved by HDF, however, HDF increased TSR and Kd of phosphate. Phosphate clearance rose from 120 (HD 1.6 m2) to 159 (HDF 1.6 m2) (p < 0.005) and from 146 (HD 2.4 m2) to 206 (HDF 2.4 m2) (p < 0.005) ml/min. Beta2-MRR increased from 64.1 +/- 8.6 to 77.7 +/- 8.2% (p < 0.005) and from 75.0 +/- 5.1 to 82.9 +/- 8.5% (p < 0.005) during HDF 1.6 m2 and HDF 2.4 m2, respectively. Collected beta2-M remained unchanged. This discrepancy seems to be due to an enhanced beta2-M adsorption to the polysulfone membrane during HDF. CONCLUSION: Our results provide a strong evidence that HDF has no advantage over HD with respect to urea and creatinine removal in vivo. However, HDF did improve the elimination of phosphate and should be considered as an additional treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients. HDF improves significantly the elimination of beta2-M.     

Beta-2-microglobulin in hemodialysis patients. Effects of different dialyzers and different dialysis procedures

beta 2-Microglobulin (beta 2m) has been identified as the major constituent of dialysis-related amyloid. Although there is no clear correlation between absolute beta 2m levels and amyloidosis-related symptoms, elevated serum levels are thought to be the basis for tissue deposition of beta 2m. Besides diminished renal excretion and insufficient removal during hemodialysis, a dialysis-related induction of beta 2m production is discussed as the major cause of elevated serum beta 2m levels. In order to evaluate the influence of hemodialysis membranes and the hemodialysis procedure on beta 2m levels we determined serum beta 2m levels in patients on chronic intermittent hemodialysis. Polymethylmethacrylate 2.0 m2, cuprophane and cellulose acetate dialyzers led to increasing beta 2m levels during dialysis, which was in excess of what could be accounted for by hemoconcentration. The polymethylmethacrylate 1.6 m2 dialyzer did not result in a significant rise of beta 2m levels during dialysis. This indicates that production of beta 2m is not only dependent on the membrane material but also on the surface area of the dialyzer. The use of polysulfone and hemophane low-flux dialyzers did not induce an increase in beta 2m levels during dialysis but a significant clearance of beta 2m was not demonstrable either. Volume-controlled dialysis with high-flux membranes (polysulfone 0.65 m2 and polysulfone 1.25 m2) lowered beta 2m; clearance values, however, were significantly higher when these dialyzers were used in a hemodiafiltration procedure. We conclude from our study that some dialysis membranes appear to induce beta 2m production, whereas others do not.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Transmembrane pressure modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss

The aim of the present study was transmembrane pressure (TMP) modulation in high-volume mixed hemodiafiltration (HDF) to optimize efficiency and minimize protein loss. The optimal flow/pressure conditions in on-line mixed HDF assisted with a feedback control of TMP were defined in this prospective randomized study in order to obtain maximal efficiency in solute removal while minimizing potential side effects. Two different TMP profiles in mixed HDF were compared in 12 unselected patients who underwent two study periods of 2 weeks each in cross-over randomized sequence: (A) constant TMP at around 300 mmHg and (B) profiled TMP, in which TMP was slowly increased from a low initial value to the maximal value. In both procedures, the mean volume exchange was 10.6+/-1.4 l/h. Mean filtration fraction was 53%. Instantaneous beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m) clearance was higher at the start of the session with profiled TMP (207+/-35 vs 194+/-28 ml/min, P<0.005), whereas no differences were found at the end (135+/-19 vs 132+/-19 ml/min). Profiled TMP resulted in a higher mean beta2-m clearance of the session (97.0+/-15.4 vs 87.8+/-18.3 ml/min, P<0.01), in lower albumin loss in the first 30 min (0.62+/-0.14 vs 0.98+/-0.18 g, P<0.0001), and, in the whole session (3.98+/-1.19 vs 5.24+/-0.77 g, P<0.001), in higher dialyzer ultrafiltration coefficients and lower resistance indexes. This study showed that the TMP feedback modulation in mixed HDF was highly effective in maintaining very high ultrafiltration rates and filtration fractions, and minimized potential side effects as a result of the improved preservation of membrane permeability and more favorable dialyzer pressure regimen.     

A study of the basic principles determining the performance of several high-flux dialyzers

The clearance characteristics of several commercially available high-flux dialyzers made from cellulose acetate, polyacrylonitrile, polysulphone, and polymethylmethacrylate were studied in vivo. The impact of increasing surface area and adding ultrafiltration on the clearances of small- and larger-molecular-weight species was assessed. The results show there are major differences in large-molecular-weight substance substance handling by different dialyzers as shown by differences in beta 2-microglobulin clearance, independent of ultrafiltration capacity. Membranes made from similar material, eg, Asahi's PAN and Hospal's AN-69 membrane, both made from polyacrylonitrile, differ significantly in their beta 2-microglobulin clearance. Increased surface area results in much greater increase in large-molecular-weight substance clearance. The present study clearly demonstrates that high water flux is not related to high large-molecular-weight permeability. Decisions with respect to impact on dialysis must be based on a knowledge of both the large- and small-molecular-weight permeabilities of the various membranes.     

New strategies in haemodiafiltration (HDF): prospective comparative analysis between on-line mixed HDF and mid-dilution HDF.

BACKGROUND: Improvement in the uraemic toxicity profile obtained with the application of convective and mixed dialysis techniques has stimulated the development of more efficient strategies. Our study was a prospective randomized evaluation of the clinical and technical characteristics of two new haemodiafiltration (HDF) strategies, mixed HDF and mid-dilution HDF, which have recently been proposed with the aim of increasing efficiency and safety with respect to the standard traditional HDF infusion modes. METHODS: Ten stable patients on renal replacement therapy (mean age 64.7 +/- 8.2 years) were submitted in randomized sequence to one mid-week session of mid-dilution HDF and one of mixed HDF with trans-membrane pressure feedback control. All sessions were carried out under similar operating conditions and involved monitoring pressure within the internal dialyser compartments and calculating the rheological and hydraulic indexes. Efficiency in removing urea, phosphate and beta2-microglobulin (beta2-m) was tested. RESULTS: In mixed HDF, safer and more effective flux/pressure conditions resulted in better preservation of the hydraulic and solute membrane permeability (mean in vivo ultrafiltration coefficient 36.9 +/- 3.9 vs 20.1 +/- 3.3 ml/h/mmHg) and ensured higher volume exchange (38.7 +/- 4.2 vs 35.3 +/- 6.5 l/session, P = 0.02) and greater efficiency in removing small and middle molecules (mean urea clearance: 274 +/- 42 vs 264 +/- 47 ml/min, P = 0.028; eKt/V: 1.78 +/- 0.22 vs 1.71 +/- 0.26, P = 0.036; mean phosphate clearance: 138 +/- 16 vs 116 +/- 45 ml/min, P = 0.2; mean beta2-m clearance: 81 +/- 13 vs 59 +/- 13 ml/min, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mixed HDF was the most efficient technique in the highest range of safe operating conditions. In mid-dilution HDF, high pressures generated inside the dialyser compromised membrane permeability and limited the total infusion rate, resulting in an overall reduction in solute removal.     

Comparison of the new polyethersulfone high-flux membrane DIAPES HF800 with conventional high-flux membranes during on-line haemodiafiltration.

BACKGROUND: Current modalities of renal replacement therapy allow only a limited removal of larger, possibly toxic molecules, which accumulate in uraemia. Recently, a haemodiafilter has been made available with the new, high-flux, polyethersulfone-based membrane DIAPES HF800. We performed a study to compare DIAPES HF800 with two conventional high-flux membranes in on-line haemodiafiltration (HDF), with respect to the removal properties for the two marker proteins, beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)m, 11.8 kDa) and albumin (66.5 kDa). METHODS: In a prospective, controlled study 10 stable end-stage renal disease patients were randomly allocated to 30 sessions of post-dilutional on-line HDF with three types of steam-sterilized membranes: DIAPES HF800, polysulfone and polyamide. Blood flow rate was 250 ml/min and treatment time was 240 min. Pre-treatment beta(2)m and albumin plasma concentrations did not differ between the three groups. The concentration of the two proteins was determined before and after treatment in plasma as well as in the continuously collected haemodiafiltrate. RESULTS: Tolerance of all treatments was very good, without any side-effects for all filters. The mean plasma reduction rate of beta(2)m was 77 +/- 1% for DIAPES HF800 and polysulfone whereas it was 71 +/- 1% for polyamide (P < 0.05). The mean beta(2)m amount removed and found in the haemodiafiltrate per session was 230 +/- 14 mg for DIAPES HF800, 186 +/- 13 mg for polysulfone and 147 +/- 13 mg for polyamide (P < 0.05 between each pair of membranes). The same ranking was obtained for albumin removed and found in haemodiafiltrate per session for the three membranes: 5.7 +/- 0.4, 3.5 +/- 0.4 and 1.0 +/- 0.4 g, respectively. Although DIAPES HF800 showed the highest value for albumin in haemodiafiltrate the mean post-treatment plasma albumin was higher after the treatment with DIAPES HF800 compared with the other membranes (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: On-line HDF has shown to achieve plasma reduction rates for beta(2)m of up to 77% for the DIAPES HF800 membrane and for polysulfone. The amounts of beta(2)m and albumin in haemodiafiltrate were much higher for DIAPES HF800 than for the other two membranes indicating a greater permeability for molecules up to a molecular weight of 66.5 kDa. This could, at least theoretically, offer the advantage also to remove uraemic toxins in the molecular weight range of albumin or of albumin-bound toxins. The future must show whether this will counterbalance the loss of albumin.     

Clinical outcomes for maintenance hemodialysis patients using a high-flux (FX60) dialyzer

Abstract

Aims: To investigate the clinical outcomes of maintenance hemodialysis (HD) patients using a high-flux (FX60) dialyzer. Method: Thirty patients undergoing dialysis for at least 2 years with a low-flux dialyzer were switched to the FX60 dialyzer for 3 years. Clinical and biochemical analysis was performed monthly for each patient. The parameters monitored included blood pressure, hemoglobin, albumin, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcium and phosphorus levels, the adequacy of dialysis (Kt/V), beta2-microglobulin (β2-MG) clearance rate, as well as antihypertensive and erythropoietin (EPO) medications. Results: After 3 years of dialysis with an FX60 dialyzer, the mean arterial blood pressure fell, hemoglobin increased, serum phosphate level decreased, iPTH declined and medication doses decreased. Conclusions: Dialysis with the FX60 dialyzer has a better clinical outcome for rectifying renal anemia, controlling hypertension and lowering serum phosphate levels making it a better choice for long-term HD patients.     

Impact of hemodialysis membrane and permeability on neutrophil transmigration in vitro

BACKGROUND/AIM: The impact of dialysis membrane permeability on neutrophil transmigration properties in vitro was examined in the present study. This issue has not been fully scrutinized before. METHODS: We studied the capacity of neutrophils collected from a group of dialysis patients randomly treated with cuprophan, low- or high-flux polysulfone, to transmigrate in vitro through a membrane covered with fibronectin (a main constituent of the endothelial basement membrane). The hemodialysis-induced quantitative changes in expression of adhesion molecules were examined in parallel. RESULTS: At the end of dialysis, neutrophils collected from patients treated with high-flux polysulfone dialyzers had a significantly higher transmigration index than neutrophils from patients treated with low-flux polysulfone membrane (p < 0.01) or cuprophan membrane (p < 0.01), and approached the level of transmigration observed in neutrophils collected from healthy controls. In the groups treated with low-flux polysulfone and cuprophan dialyzers, the transmigration capacity was significantly lower (p < 0.02) compared to neutrophils from healthy subjects. We also noted that differences between low- and high-flux polysulfone dialysis, in the context of transmigration properties, were not mirrored by changes in adhesion phenotype, which strengthens the view that there is no strict relationship between these two features. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrates that high-flux polysulfone dialysis, as opposed to low-flux polysulfone and cuprophan treatment, improves the transmigration properties of circulating neutrophils, despite similar effects on adhesion molecule phenotypes. A plausible mechanism is that potentially toxic middle range molecules that inhibit neutrophil migration are more efficiently eliminated during high-flux polysulfone dialysis, but this explanation requires further support.     

Comparison of hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration: a long-term longitudinal study.

Although hemodiafiltration is purported to provide better cardiovascular stability for dialysis patients; other possible benefits of this therapy have not been well defined. We have compared treatment with hemodialysis (HD) and hemodiafiltration (HDF) in 20 stable patients over a period of 18 months. Dialysis parameters (dialysate composition and flow, duration, dialyzer) were the same in the two periods except for the added convection of HDF and a higher tolerated blood flow in HDF. Cardiovascular parameters were remarkably similar in the two treatment periods, indicating that stable patients do not benefit further from this therapy in terms of these factors. The clearance of urea was significantly improved with HDF, which was reflected in a higher Kt/V and lower TACurea. We observed a significant correlation between Kt/V and PRU in both HD and HDF modes. This correlation was linear and the regression line was similar in both modes. The clearance of beta 2-microglobulin was also significantly improved by HDF compared to HD. Thus the benefit of HDF in stable dialysis patients is the improved clearance of small molecules and beta 2-microglobulin without increasing dialysis time. Further clinical benefits due to the improved clearance may only become apparent with longer follow-up.     

Beta(2)-microglobulin clearance decreases with Renalin reuse

The HEMO study revealed that beta(2)-microglobulin clearance decreases over time with Renalin reuse in the high-flux group. It was suggested that the reuse of polysulfone or cellulose triacetate high-flux dialyzers with Renalin (without bleach) results in degradation of the high-flux capacity. At our haemodialysis unit (Vila Real, Portugal) we reused dialyzers until January 2000 (limited to 10 reuses), with an automatic machine Renatron (Renal Systems, Minntech. All of our 31 patients who started with postdilution haemodiafiltration on-line (HDFol) were always dialyzed with F-80 polysulfone (Fresenius). The reposition rate was 10 litres/session until 1998 and 20 litres/session thereafter. Reuse techniques were abandoned in our country in January 2000 following an EEC directive. Thereafter, we have decided to maintain HDFol with the same dialyzers without reuse. The mean beta(2)-microglobulin predialysis values did not decrease over time until reuse was terminated (1995 with low-flux haemodialysis: 25.4 +/- 6.4 microg/l; 1997: 24.7 +/- 6.6 microg/l; 1998: 29.2 +/- 8.9 microg/l; 1999: 33.7 +/- 4.7 microg/l) whereas beta(2)-microglobulin clearances were reasonable with HDFol (1998: 56.4 +/- 25.9 ml/min; 1999: 47.9 +/- 16.4 ml/min). After stopping reuse we have noticed that predialysis beta(2)-microglobulin values decreased (2000: 23.0 +/- 3.9 microg/l) in accordance with beta(2)-microglobulin clearance duplication (2000: 84.1 +/- 25.0 ml/min; p < 0.01). It is our opinion that the reuse of polysulfone dialyzers with Renalin should be abandoned in the field of high-flux haemodialysis. It causes deterioration in the beta(2)-microglobulin clearance and probably interferes with the high-flux haemodialysis benefits, namely the reduction of dialysis-related amyloidosis.     

Hemodiafiltration history, technology, and clinical results

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) is an extracorporeal renal-replacement technique using a highly permeable membrane, in which diffusion and convection are conveniently combined to enhance solute removal in a wide spectrum of molecular weights. In this modality, ultrafiltration exceeds the desired fluid loss in the patient, and replacement fluid must be administered to achieve the target fluid balance. Over the years, various HDF variants have emerged, including acetate-free biofiltration, high-volume HDF, internal HDF, paired-filtration dialysis, middilution HDF, double high-flux HDF, push-pull HDF, and online HDF. Recent technology has allowed online production of large volumes of microbiologically ultrapure fluid for reinfusion, greatly simplifying the practice of HDF. Several advantages of HDF over purely diffusive hemodialysis techniques have been described in the literature, including a greater clearance of urea, phosphate, beta(2)-microglobulin and other larger solutes, reduction in dialysis hypotension, and improved anemia management. Although randomized controlled trials have failed to show a survival benefit of HDF, recent data from large observational studies suggest a positive effect of HDF on survival. This article provides a brief review of the history of HDF, the various HDF techniques, and summary of their clinical effects.     

Water permeability of high-flux dialyzer membranes after Renalin reprocessing

Dialysis with high-flux membranes is widely used, in part, because they are thought to increase the removal of middle molecules when compared with low-flux membranes. Dialyzer reprocessing; however, is thought to alter middle molecule clearance. Renalin, a mixture of germicidal agents, has widespread use in dialyzer reprocessing. We determined the effect of Renalin reprocessing on the water permeability of three different dialyzers of Fresenius (F80A and 200A) and Gambro (17R) manufacture using the dead-end filtration method. Two hundred and seventeen, predominantly used but some new, dialyzers were evaluated. Water permeability of the used, but not the new, dialyzers fell abruptly and dramatically with reprocessing. The permeability fell almost 70% in the F80A dialyzer after three reprocessing procedures with similar, but somewhat slower declines, seen in the other two dialyzers. We conclude that there is a decline in water permeability seen in Renalin reprocessed dialyzers. This factor and the associated change in solute clearance and ultrafiltration characteristics should be considered in assessing the effectiveness of dialyzer reprocessing.     

Removal of uraemic plasma factor(s) using different dialysis modalities reduces phosphatidylserine exposure in red blood cells.

BACKGROUND: Solute(s) retained during uraemia cause increased exposure of aminophospholipid phosphatidylserine (PS) on the outer surface of erythrocyte membranes, and this phenomenon may be involved in the pathophysiology of uraemia by promoting abnormal erythrocyte interactions. METHODS: We examined in a prospective randomized cross-over fashion the ability of various dialysis modalities to remove the circulating uraemic factor(s) causing increased PS externalization in red cells. Each patient was treated with haemodialysis (HD) and with on-line haemodiafiltration (HDF) using standard high-flux polysulphone membranes or with the new polisulphone-based Helixone membrane to compare the effects of dialysis technique and membrane type on PS exposure. Removal of PS was assessed indirectly by measuring PS-expressing normal erythrocytes exposed to uraemic plasma or to ultrafiltrate obtained at various time points during the extracorporeal session. RESULTS: Removal of the uraemic plasma factor(s) causing PS exposure was demonstrated by the reduced ability of uraemic plasma at the end of dialysis to induce PS exposure in normal erythrocytes, and by the capacity of ultrafiltrate from the dialysate side of the dialyzer membrane to markedly increase PS-positive red cells. However, the degree of removal varied according to the dialyzer type and to dialysis technique. Removal was greater for on-line HDF using the Helixone membrane, intermediate and comparable with HD with Helixone and with on-line HDF using standard polysulphone, and lower for HD using polysulphone membrane. The putative uraemic compound causing PS exposure seems to be highly lipophilic, somehow associated with plasma proteins, and apparently having a molecular weight between 10 and 10.8 kDa. CONCLUSIONS: Uraemia is associated with retention of compound(s) that are lipophilic, possibly protein-bound and which cause an abnormal exposure of PS in erythrocytes. Our findings, that such compound(s) can be removed during dialysis and at higher rates with convection techniques, indicate a potential benefit for uraemic patients. The present results also seem to confirm the marked ability of high-flux Helixone membranes to eliminate high molecular weight solutes.     

Mixed predilution and postdilution online hemodiafiltration compared with the traditional infusion modes

BACKGROUND: On postdilution hemodiafiltration (post-HDF), convective removal of medium-high molecular weight solutes is, at the highest ultrafiltration rates, limited by high blood viscosity and protein concentration. Prefilter reinfusion (pre-HDF) may overcome this problem, but plasma dilution may affect the overall efficiency of the technique. In this study, an experimental system of online HDF with combined prefilter and postfilter infusion (mixed HDF) was evaluated and compared with the traditional predilution and postdilution modes. METHODS: Removal of urea (U), creatinine (Cr), phosphate (Phos), and beta(2)-microglobulin (beta(2)m), ultrafiltration coefficients of the dialyzer (K(UF)), and rheologic conditions of the blood circuit were evaluated during the three infusion modes (a total of 36 runs lasting 180 min), performed with a polysulfone hemofilter 1.8 m(2), blood flow (Q(b)) 400 mL/min, dialysate flow (Q(d)) 700 mL/min, and infusion rate 120 mL/min (pre-HDF and post-HDF), or 60 + 60 mL/min (mixed HDF). RESULTS: The mean effective U and Cr clearances and urea index of dialysis dose (eKt/V) were significantly higher on post-HDF than on pre-HDF (K(WB) (U) 210 vs. 193 mL/min, K(DQ) (Cr) 152 vs. 142 mL/min, eKt/V 1.41 vs. 1.30), while mixed HDF did not show significant differences versus post-HDF (K(WB) (U) 201 mL/min, K(DQ) (Cr) 149 mL/min). K(DQ) for Phos and beta(2)m were higher on post-HDF in only absolute values. Similar differences were found for instantaneous dialyzer clearances (K(I)) at 60, 120, and 180 minutes of the sessions, with a common trend to decrease with time. K(UF) and the apparent beta(2)m sieving coefficient showed their lowest values toward the end of post-HDF sessions. Increasing filtration fractions (FFs) were associated with increasing transmembrane pressure (TMP) and solute clearances up to FF values of 0.45. These were values achieved in only post-HDF, at which point the curve of the relationship between TMP and FF assumed its steepest exponential trend. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed HDF, by better preserving the characteristics of water and solute transport of the membrane, ensured safer operating conditions than post-HDF, while achieving similar removal of small- and large-size solutes. Optimizing the ratio of prefilter/postfilter infusion and the total infusion according to the relationships found in our study between solute clearances, FF, and TMP, convective flux and transport may avoid excessive hemoconcentration and dangerous pressure gradients.