Low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole vs. full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin for eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To compare, in a randomized controlled trial, the efficacy and tolerability of two 1-week triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, clarithromycin 250 mg twice daily, and metronidazole 500 mg twice daily (LCM group), or lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily, and amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily (LCA group). H. pylori status was assessed by rapid urease test, histology and 13C-urea breath test before and after therapy. RESULTS: At 3 months, H. pylori eradication (intention- to-treat/per protocol analysis) was 92.4%/93.8% in the LCM group and 83.1%/85.7% in the LCA group (P=N.S.). Side-effects were more frequently reported in the LCA group (37.9%) than in the LCM group (19.7%) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In this open, randomized controlled trial, eradication of H. pylori by low-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus metronidazole was higher with significantly less side-effects than by full-dose lansoprazole and clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. This finding may be related to the stronger synergism of clarithromycin plus metronidazole, even at lower doses, than of clarithromycin plus amoxicillin. Considering the lower cost as well, LCM should be preferred to LCA in the eradication of H. pylori.     

Lansoprazole, levofloxacin and amoxicillin triple therapy vs. quadruple therapy as second-line treatment of resistant Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To test the efficacy of levofloxacin-based second-line therapy for resistant Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: One hundred and six patients who failed H. pylori eradication were randomized to receive (i) lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 1 g, levofloxacin 500 mg, all given twice daily for 7 days (LAL); or (ii) lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, metronidazole 400 mg thrice daily, bismuth subcitrate 120 mg and tetracycline 500 mg four times daily for 7 days (quadruple). Post-treatment H. pylori status was determined by (13)C-urea breath test. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat and per-protocol H. pylori eradication rates were 57/60% for the LAL group and 71/76% for the quadruple group respectively. Metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and levofloxacin resistance were found in 76%, 71%, 0% and 18% of patients, respectively. Levofloxacin resistance led to treatment failure in the LAL group. For patients with dual resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin, the eradication rates were 79% in the LAL group (levofloxacin-sensitive) and 65% in the quadruple group (P=0.34). CONCLUSION: Lansoprazole, amoxicillin plus levofloxacin second-line therapy is comparable with quadruple therapy in efficacy. Subjects, especially those with dual resistance to metronidazole and clarithromycin, may consider levofloxacin-based therapy for levofloxacin-sensitive strains.     

First-line eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori in primary health care based on antibiotic resistance: results of three eradication regimens

AIM: To determine the efficacy of three Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens and factors affecting the eradication results in Finland. METHODS: A total of 342 H. pylori-positive adult patients from primary health care referred for gastroscopy at 23 centres in different parts of Finland were randomized to receive either (i) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. (LAM), (ii) lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (LAC), or (iii) ranitidine bismuth citrate 400 mg b.d., metronidazole 400 mg t.d.s. and tetracycline 500 mg q.d.s. (RMT). A (13)C-urea breath test was performed 4 weeks after therapy. RESULTS: The eradication result could be assessed in 329 cases. Intention-to-treat cure rates of LAM, LAC, and RMT were 78, 91 and 81%. The difference was significant between LAM and LAC (P = 0.01) and between LAC and RMT (P = 0.04). The eradication rates in cases with metronidazole-susceptible vs. -resistant isolates were for LAM 93% vs. 53% (P = 0.00001), for LAC 95% vs. 84%, and for RMT 91% vs. 67% (P = 0.002). Previous antibiotic use, smoking, and coffee drinking reduced the efficacy of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected patients in primary health care, LAC was the most effective first-line eradication.     

Effect of ornidazole and clarithromycin resistance on eradication of Helicobacter pylori in peptic ulcer disease

BACKGROUND: Clarithromycin and nitroimidazoles such as metronidazole and ornidazole are among the most frequently used antibiotics for curing Helicobacter pylori infection. However, controversial data exist on whether their in vitro resistance has a negative impact on treatment outcome. METHODS: Patients with H. pylori positive active peptic ulcer disease were randomly assigned to receive lansoprazole 30 mg o.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and ornidazole 500 mg b.d. (LAO) or lansoprazole 30 mg o.d., amoxycillin 1 g b.d. and clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (LAC) for 2 weeks. Pre-treatment resistance to ornidazole and clarithromycin was assessed by Epsilometer (E-) test. Four weeks after completion of treatment, patients underwent a 13C urea breath test to assess H. pylori status. RESULTS: Data from 80 patients with active peptic ulcer disease and positive H. pylori status were analysed. The prevalence of primary drug resistance was 25% for metronidazole and 7.5% for clarithromycin. In patients treated with LAO, effective treatment was achieved in 87% of metronidazole-susceptible, but only 30% of metronidazole-resistant strains (P < 0.01). In the LAC group, therapy was successful in 81% of clarithromycin-susceptible strains, whereas treatment failed in all patients with primary clarithromycin resistance (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Resistance against nitroimidazoles significantly affects treatment outcome in H. pylori eradication therapy.     

Efficacy of ecabet sodium for Helicobacter pylori eradication triple therapy in comparison with a lansoprazole-based regimen

BACKGROUND: The cytoprotective agent, ecabet sodium, inhibits urease activity and growth of Helicobacter pylori. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ecabet sodium-based eradication of H. pylori infection, compared with a lansoprazole-based regimen, in a randomized multicentre study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 120 H. pylori-positive patients were assigned to one of two treatment regimens for 2 weeks: ecabet sodium 1 g b.d., amoxicillin 500 mg t.d.s. and clarithromycin 400 mg b.d. (EAC: 60 patients); or lansoprazole 30 mg (o.m.) with the same antimicrobial agents (LAC: 60 patients). Cure of infection was assessed by a 13C-urea breath test 1 month after completion of treatment. RESULTS: One patient in the EAC group and two in the LAC group did not complete therapy because of an adverse event, and three did not undergo the 13C-urea breath test. Cure rates for the intention-to-treat, all-patients-treated and per protocol analysis in the EAC group were 85%, 86% and 88%, respectively, whereas those in the LAC group were 85%, 88% and 91%. There were no significant differences in cure rate or adverse events between the two regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Ecabet sodium in combination with amoxicillin and clarithromycin is as effective as lansoprazole-based eradication therapy for H. pylori.     

Efficacy of low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies are recommended as the first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication. AIM: To evaluate the efficacies of low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy in a metronidazole resistance prevalent area and to compare the efficacies with standard triple therapy. METHODS: In a randomized, multicentre, prospective study, a total of 352 patients with duodenal ulcer or non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomly divided into three groups according to the administered regimen: OAC250 group (omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 250 mg), OAC500 group (omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg) and OTC group (omeprazole, 20 mg, tinidazole, 500 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg). The three groups received each regimen twice daily for 7 days. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed before and 4 weeks after treatment. H. pylori status was determined by rapid urease test and 13C urea breath test. RESULTS: The eradication rates in the OAC250, OAC500 and OTC groups were 76.2%, 65.7% and 64.8% (95% confidence interval: 67.9-84.4%, 56.7-74.8% and 55.7-73.9%), respectively, by intention-to-treat analysis (P=0.149) and 92.8%, 87.2% and 84.1% (95% confidence interval: 84.4-97.3%, 77.9-93.8% and 73.9-91.2%), respectively, by per protocol analysis (P=0.088). All regimens were well tolerated and compliance was excellent. CONCLUSIONS: Both low-dose clarithromycin triple therapy and tinidazole-containing triple therapy are effective and safe regimens for H. pylori eradication.     

A randomized comparison of four omeprazole-based triple therapy regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates in France after therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin are among the lowest in Europe. This study evaluated alternative eradication regimens. METHODS: Helicobacter pylori-positive patients (n=323) with non-ulcer dyspepsia were randomized to receive one of four 1-week regimens consisting of omeprazole, 20 mg b.d., plus either: amoxicillin, 1000 mg b.d., and clarithromycin, 500 mg b.d. (OAC); bacampicillin, 1200 mg b.d., and clarithromycin, 500 mg b.d. (OBC); clarithromycin, 250 mg b.d., and metronidazole, 500 mg b.d. (OCM); or amoxicillin, 1000 mg b.d, and azithromycin, 500 mg on day 1 and 250 mg on days 2-5 (OAAz). Eradication was confirmed by urea breath test 4-6 weeks after treatment. Susceptibility testing was performed in the case of eradication failure. RESULTS: The eradication rate with OAAz was 38% (95% CI, 25.6-49.4) on intention-to-treat analysis, which was lower (P < 0.05) than with the other regimens [OCM, 61% (50.0-72.8); OBC, 65% (54.0-76.5); OAC, 72% (61.8-81.8)]. Of the strains isolated following treatment failure with OAC, OBC or OCM, 84% were clarithromycin resistant. CONCLUSIONS: OAC remains the reference treatment for H. pylori eradication in France, although bacampicillin offers a useful alternative to amoxicillin. Susceptibility testing should be considered after unsuccessful eradication therapy.     

Polaprezinc, a mucosal protective agent, in combination with lansoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin increases the cure rate of Helicobacter pylori infection

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of polaprezinc, a mucosal protective agent, in combination with a 7-day triple therapy containing lansoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin, as a treatment for Helicobacter pylori. METHODS: Sixty-six consecutive patients suffering from dyspeptic symptoms with H. pylori infection were randomly allocated to one of two regimens: one group (LAC; n = 31) received lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., amoxycillin 500 mg b.d. and clarithromycin 400 mg b.d. for 7 days. The other group (LACP; n = 35) received the LAC regimen plus polaprezinc 150 mg b.d. for 7 days. H. pylori status was evaluated by rapid urease test, histology and culture at entry and 4 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Five patients did not complete the treatment: no follow-up endoscopy was performed on two patients in the LAC group; one patient in the LAC group and two in the LACP group had their treatment stopped due to severe diarrhoea. By per protocol analysis, H. pylori eradication was achieved in 24 of the 28 evaluable patients (86%; 95% CI: 72-100%) after LAC therapy, and in 33 of the 33 evaluable patients (100%) after LACP therapy (P < 0.05). On intention-to-treat analysis, the rates of eradication were 24 of 31 patients (77%; 95% CI: 62-93%) in the LAC group, and 33 of 35 patients (94%; 95% CI: 86-100%) in the LACP group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: A 7-day triple therapy with lansoprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin is effective in H. pylori eradication, but this regimen is significantly improved by the addition of polaprezinc.     

Efficacy of sucralfate for Helicobacter pylori eradication triple therapy in comparison with a lansoprazole-based regimen

BACKGROUND: Sucralfate has an inhibitory action against Helicobacter pylori and enhances the anti-H. pylori activity of antimicrobials. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sucralfate-based eradication therapy for H. pylori infection, compared with that based on lansoprazole, in a randomized multicentre study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 150 H. pylori-positive patients. They were randomly assigned to one of two regimens for 2 weeks: sucralfate 1 g t.d.s., amoxycillin 500 mg t.d.s., and clarithromycin 400 mg b.d. (SAC regimen: 75 patients); or lansoprazole 30 mg o.m. with the same antimicrobial medications (LAC regimen: 75 patients). Cure of infection was assessed by a 13C urea breath test 1 month after completion of treatment. RESULTS: Eight patients (four in the SAC group and four in LAC group) could not continue therapy because of severe diarrhoea, and three did not take the 13C urea breath test after therapy. Cure rates for intention-to-treat, all-patients-treated, and per protocol analysis in the SAC group were 80%, 83%, and 88%, respectively, and those in the LAC group were 87%, 87%, and 92%, respectively. There were no significant differences in cure rate or adverse effects between the two regimens. CONCLUSION: Sucralfate in combination with amoxycillin and clarithromycin is as effective as lansoprazole-based eradication therapy for H. pylori.     

The importance of the level of metronidazole resistance for the success of Helicobacter pylori eradication

AIMS: To evaluate the role of antibiotic susceptibility for the treatment outcome of proton pump inhibitor-dependent and independent Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled clinical study of peptic ulcer patients with H. pylori infection, patients were randomized to receive lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole twice-daily, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily with lansoprazole or with placebo. Helicobacter pylori status was assessed by culture and antibiotic susceptibility by E-test minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in 205 clinical isolates. RESULTS: Primary resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole was 1 and 76%, respectively. In metronidazole susceptible strains eradication rates were similar at > 90% for all treatment groups (P = 0.49). With low-level metronidazole resistance (4 microg/mL < MIC < 256 microg/mL), eradication rates were similar at >75% (P = 0.80). The major difference was found at high-level metronidazole resistance (MIC >or= 256 microg/mL) with 95%, 58% and 21% eradication in the lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole twice-daily, lansoprazole, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily and placebo, clarithromycin and tinidazole once-daily groups, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In the absence of antibiotic resistance, a once-daily therapy of only clarithromycin and tinidazole can achieve a high rate of H. pylori eradication. Such a combination could offer a simpler and cheaper treatment option for developing countries. The standard, twice-daily proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy was shown to be efficient in H. pylori eradication even in the presence of high-level metronidazole resistance.     

Pharmacoeconomic comparison of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens

Background Helicobacter pylori is the most important etiologic agent for development of peptic ulcer, chronic gastritis and gastric carcinomas. It is now well established that H. pylori eradication treatment is more cost-effective than acid suppressing therapies alone for the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. However, the comparative cost-effectiveness of various H. pylori eradication regimens is still not clear.Objective This study was designed to make a pharmacoeconomic comparison of different H. pylori eradication regimens in patients with peptic ulcer disease or chronic gastritis, using real-world cost and effectiveness data.Setting Istanbul University Hospital and Marmara University Hospital.Method A total of 75 patients diagnosed as H. pylori (+) by endoscopy were randomized to receive one of the seven H. pylori treatment protocols. These protocols were as follows: (LAC) = ‘lansoprazole 30 mg bid + amoxicillin 1 g bid + clarithromycin 500 mg bid’ for 7 days and (OCM) = ‘omeprazole 20 mg bid + clarithromycin 250 mg bid + metronidazole 500 mg bid’; (OAM) = ‘omeprazole 40 mg qd + amoxicillin 500 mg tid + metronidazole 500 mg tid’; (MARB) = ‘metronidazole 250 mg tid + amoxicillin 500 mg qid + ranitidine 300 mg hs + bismuth 300 mg qid’; (OAC) = omeprazole 20 mg bid + amoxicillin 1 g bid + clarithromycin 500 mg bid’; (OCA) = omeprazole 40 mg bid + clarithromycin 500 mg bid + amoxicillin 1 g bid’; (OAB) = ‘omeprazole 20 mg bid + amoxicillin 500 mg tid + bismuth 300 mg qid’ each for 14 days. Only direct costs were included in the analysis. Effectiveness was measured in terms of “successful eradication”. The cost-effectiveness ratios of the regimens were calculated using these effectiveness and cost data. The perspective of the study was assumed as the Government’s perspective.Main outcome measure Cost-effectiveness ratios of eradication regimens.Results MARB and OCA regimens were found to be more cost-effective than the other treatment regimens. The eradication rates and cost-effectiveness ratios calculated for these protocols were 90% (€158.7) for MARB and 90% (€195.8) for OCA regimen.Conclusion This study confirms the importance of using local pharmacoeconomic data. Analyses such as this give decision-makers the tools to choose a better treatment option which is both highly effective yet and has a low cost.     

Helicobacter pylori eradication using one-week low-dose lansoprazole plus amoxycillin and either clarithromycin or azithromycin

Aim : To evaluate and compare two 1-week low-dose triple therapies based on lansoprazole, amoxycillin and a macrolide in eradicating Helicobacter pylori .
Methods : Seventy consecutive patients, suffering from dyspeptic symptoms with H. pylori infection, were randomly allocated to one of two treatment groups: (A) (LAC; n =35) lansoprazole 30 mg once daily, amoxycillin 1000 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d., all for 7 days; and (B) (LAA; n =35) lansoprazole 30 mg once daily and amoxycillin 1000 mg b.d., both for 7 days, plus azithromycin 500 mg once daily for only 3 days. The H. pylori status was evaluated by means of histology and rapid urease test at entry and 8 weeks after treatment.
Results : Three patients did not complete the treatment: one in the LAC group was withdrawn owing to severe side-effects; two patients in the LAA group stopped the treatment prematurely. H. pylori eradication was obtained in 28 of 34 (82%; 95% CI=66–93%) patients in the LAC group and in 20 of 33 (61%; 95% CI=42–77%) patients in the LAA group. The difference is significant ( P <0.029). On intention-to-treat analysis, the rates of eradication were (28 of 35 patients, 80% in the LAC group and 20 of 35 patients, 57% in the LAA group. Side-effects occurred in nine (26%) and six (18%) patients in the LAC and LAA groups, respectively.
Conclusions : Low-dose lansoprazole plus amoxycillin and clarithromycin is more effective than low-dose lansoprazole plus amoxycillin and azithromycin, but it gave a greater incidence of side-effects.     

One-week ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori in Hong Kong with high prevalence of metronidazole resistance

AIM: To compare 1-week ranitidine bismuth citrate-based (RBC) triple therapy vs. omeprazole-based (O) triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection in Hong Kong with high prevalence of metronidazole resistance. METHODS: Patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia and H. pylori infection were randomized to receive either: (i) RBCCM: ranitidine bismuth citrate (pylorid) 400 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg; or (ii) OCM: omeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 250 mg and metronidazole 400 mg, each given twice daily for 1 week. Endoscopy (CLO test, histology and culture) and 13C-urea breath test were performed before randomization and 6 weeks after drug treatment. RESULTS: A total of 180 patients were randomized. H. pylori eradication rates (intention-to-treat, n=180/per protocol, n=166) were 83%/92% for RBCCM and 66%/70% for OCM (P=0.01, intention-to-treat and P=0.001, per protocol, respectively). RBCCM treatment was unaffected by metronidazole susceptibility and achieved a significantly higher eradication rate in metronidazole-resistant cases (89%) than the OCM group (45%, P=0.0064). CONCLUSION: One-week ranitidine bismuth citrate-based triple therapy is significantly better than omeprazole-based triple therapy for the eradication of H. pylori infection, especially in metronidazole-resistant cases. It is an effective regimen for the eradication of H. pylori infection in regions with a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance.     

Levofloxacin-based triple therapy vs. quadruple therapy in second-line Helicobacter pylori treatment: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND: Levofloxacin has been shown to be effective in Helicobacter pylori eradication. Two 10-day levofloxacin-based triple therapies were compared with standard 7- and 14-day quadruple regimens in second-line treatment. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty consecutive patients who failed to respond to standard triple therapy (clarithromycin, amoxicillin, rabeprazole) were randomly assigned to four groups: (1) levofloxacin 500 mg o.d., amoxicillin 1 g b.d., rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 10 days (LAR, n = 70); (2) levofloxacin 500 mg o.d., tinidazole 500 mg b.d., rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 10 days (LTR, n = 70); (3) tetracycline 500 mg q.d.s., metronidazole 500 mg t.d.s., bismuth salt 120 mg q.d.s., rabeprazole 20 mg b.d. for 7 days (7TMBR, n = 70); and (4) for 14 days (14TMBR, n = 70). Helicobacter pylori status and side-effects were assessed 6 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The eradication rate was 94% in the LAR group and 90% in the LTR group in both intention-to-treat and per protocol analyses. Helicobacter pylori eradication was achieved in 63 and 69% of the 7TMBR group and in 69 and 80% of the 14TMBR group in intention-to-treat and per protocol analysis, respectively. Side-effects were significantly lower in the LAR and LTR groups than in the 14TMBR group. CONCLUSION: Ten-day levofloxacin-based therapies are better than standard quadruple regimens as second-line option for H. pylori eradication.     

Salvage therapies after failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication with ranitidine bismuth citrate-based therapies

BACKGROUND: Salvage therapies after initial Helicobacter pylori eradication failure of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based regimens remain undefined. AIM: To test the efficacy of 1-week omeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin as a second-line treatment and 1-week quadruple therapy after repeated failures of RBC- and proton pump inhibitor-based regimens. METHOD: Patients were recruited from a recently published prospective randomized study if confirmed to have failed H. pylori eradication with RBC-based regimens. They were given omeprazole 20 mg, amoxycillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg (OAC) b.d. for 1 week. 13C-urea breath test was performed 4 weeks after the conclusion of medication. Those who failed to respond to OAC were given 1-week quadruple therapy (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg and metronidazole 400 mg q.d.s. plus omeprazole 20 mg b.d.). RESULTS: Among 398 patients receiving RBC-based therapies, 40 (10%) had failed eradication (RAC=7, RC-2=12, RMC=7, and RMT=14). OAC was prescribed to 31 patients (RAC=4, RC-2=9, RMC=6, and RMT=12) and 68% had successful eradication. Nine out of 10 patients with failed second treatment received quadruple therapy; successful eradication occurred in 83% (5 out of 6) after repeated failures of clarithromycin-based regimens. CONCLUSION: One-week OAC is not an optimal second-line therapy when RBC-clarithromycin combinations fail. Quadruple therapy appears to be effective despite repeated failures of clarithromycin-based RBC or proton pump inhibitor therapies.     

Comparison of two low-dose one-week triple therapy regimens with and without metronidazole for cure of H. pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: One-week triple therapy consisting of omeprazole 20 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and tinidazole 500 mg b.d. is an effective therapy for H. pylori infection with a cure rate of 93%. We therefore compared two similar 1-week regimens consisting of a lansoprazole, clarithromycin and either metronidazole or tetracycline in a prospective study. METHODS: Two cohorts, each of 60 patients suffering from H. pylori infection associated with peptic ulcer disease or ulcer-like dyspepsia, were treated for 1 week with either lansoprazole 30 mg b.d., clarithromycin 250 mg b.d. and either metronidazole 400 mg b.d. (cohort A, n = 60) or tetracycline 300 mg b.d. (cohort B, n = 60). Four weeks after treatment, cure of H. pylori infection was evaluated by endoscopy using rapid urease testing together with histology. RESULTS: In cohort A, 55 patients out of 60 showed cure of H. pylori infection (92%); the treatment was well tolerated, but three patients suffered from side-effects. In cohort B, which was free of metronidazole, 50 out of 60 patients showed cure of H. pylori infection (83%); two patients reported side-effects. The differences between the two cohorts were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Triple therapy for 1 week with lansoprazole as the antisecretory agent seems to be as effective as is reported for omeprazole-based regimens.     

枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁三联与兰索拉唑三联及四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的研究

目的:观察枸橼酸铋雷尼替丁(RBC)三联疗法对根除幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori,Hp)的效果,并通过与兰索拉唑三联或四联疗法对照研究以评价不同方案的疗效及其安全性.方法:93例经胃镜证实的Hp阳性伴有明显异常的慢性胃炎患者,随机分成RBC三联组(A组,RBC 350mg 阿莫西林1g 甲硝唑400mg,bid,疗程1周)、兰索拉唑三联组(B组,兰索拉唑30mg 阿莫西林1g 甲硝唑400mg,bid,疗程1周)和兰索拉唑四联组(C组,兰索拉唑30mg 阿莫西林1g 甲硝唑400mg 枸橼酸铋钾220mg,bid,疗程1周).疗程结束4周后复查Hp感染情况,观察Hp根除率、症状缓解率及不良反应等.结果:A,B和C三组Hp根除率分别为85%,84%和90%;3组疼痛缓解率分别为86%,83%和91%.组间比较均无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:RBC为主的三联疗法的Hp根除率与以兰索拉唑为主的三联及四联疗法相当,不良反应发生相似.     

四种治疗方案对儿童幽门螺杆菌感染的临床疗效观察

目的观察4种治疗方案对根除儿童幽门螺杆菌感染(Helicobacter Pylori,H.pylori)的疗效。方法200例H.pylori感染患儿随机分到4组,疗程均为14 d。A组(52例):奥美拉唑、阿莫西林联合克拉霉素混悬液;B组(51例):奥美拉唑、阿莫西林联合甲硝唑;C组(45例):奥美拉唑、甲硝唑联合克拉霉素混悬液;D组(52例):奥美拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素混悬液联合枸橼酸铋剂。结果四组治疗方案对H.pylori感染根除率的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组和D组的根除率均大于90%。结论这些方案均有较高的根除率(≥80%),青霉素过敏患儿推荐C方案,奥美拉唑、阿莫西林联合克拉霉素混悬液组为最佳儿童H.pylori感染根除疗法。     

A multicentre study on eradication of Helicobacter pylori using four 1-week triple therapies in China

BACKGROUND: Short-term proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapies for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori are used widely. The eradication rates vary greatly from country to country and from region to region. AIM: To assess the efficacy at eradicating H. pylori of 1-week regimens containing three medications: omeprazole (O) or colloidal bismuth subcitrate (B), furazolidone (F) or metronidazole (M), and amoxicillin (A) or clarithromycin (C). METHODS: A multicentre study involving 20 hospitals in different regions of China. A total of 892 patients with H. pylori-positive non-ulcer dyspepsia or healed duodenal ulcer confirmed by endoscopy were recruited to receive, randomly, one of four regimens: OMC, OFC, OFA, and BFC, b.d. for 7 days. 13C-urea breath test was performed 4-8 weeks after completion of treatment. RESULTS: The eradication rates with per protocol/intention-to-treat analyses were: OMC (n=217/219) 66%/65%; OFC (n=227/229) 69%/69%; OFA (n=223/225) 87%/86%; and BFC (n=214/219) 80%/78%. The eradication rate (per protocol analysis) in duodenal ulcer (79%) was higher than that in non-ulcer dyspepsia (73%, P=0.033). Patient compliance was good. The adverse events of the four regimens were mild, and mainly gastrointestinal. CONCLUSIONS: The omeprazole, furazolidine and amoxicillin regimen achieves a high H. pylori eradication rate in different geographical regions of China.     

Clarithromycin vs. furazolidone in quadruple therapy regimens for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori in a population with a high metronidazole resistance rate

BACKGROUND: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori plays a pivotal role in the treatment of peptic ulcer disease. Metronidazole resistance, common in Iran, is claimed to be a major reason for the failure of metronidazole-containing regimens. Both clarithromycin and furazolidone are potential alternatives for metronidazole. AIM: To assess and compare the effectiveness of clarithromycin- and furazolidone-based regimens in eradicating H. pylori in a population with a high metronidazole resistance rate. METHODS: Patients with proven duodenal ulcer and H. pylori infection were randomly assigned to one of two groups. The patients received 2 weeks of omeprazole 20 mg b.d., amoxicillin 1000 mg b.d, bismuth subcitrate 240 mg b.d. and either clarithromycin 500 mg b.d. (the OABC group) or furazolidone 200 mg b.d. (the OABF group). RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were randomized, 55 in the OABC group and 63 in the OABF group. The intention-to-treat eradication rate was 84% and 85% for the OABF and OABC groups, respectively. The per protocol eradication rates were 90% for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: OABC and OABF are both effective in eradicating H. pylori in areas where metronidazole resistance is a problem. OABF is a good alternative in the face of growing resistance to clarithromycin in developed countries, and is attractive for developing countries where clarithromycin is not readily available.