Current incidence, treatment patterns and outcome of end-stage renal disease among indigenous groups in Australia and New Zealand

SUMMARY: The changes in rates of treated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) among indigenous populations have profound consequences for those individuals affected and for health-care providers. By using data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry, we examined the current incidence, treatment and outcomes of ESRD among indigenous groups in Australia and New Zealand. All patients who began renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Australia or New Zealand between October 1991 and September 2000 were included. Rates of ESRD, RRT modalities, renal transplantation and mortality were the outcomes examined. End-stage renal disease rates among indigenous groups in Australia and New Zealand exceeded non-indigenous rates up to eightfold. The median age of indigenous ESRD patients was younger (51 vs 60 years, P  < 0.0001), and there was an excess of comorbidities, particularly diabetes. For Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, and New Zealand Maori patients, mortality rates across all modalities of RRT were 70% higher than non-indigenous rates. Indigenous people were less likely to receive a renal transplant prior to dialysis treatment, less likely to be accepted onto the cadaveric transplant waiting list, and less likely to receive a well-matched transplant. The poorer outcomes among Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders, and New Zealand Maori patients did not appear to be explained by the different comorbid conditions or age. Whether the outcomes reflect unmeasured differences in disease burden or treatment differences is not known. Tackling this problem will involve a spectrum of people and approaches, from tertiary care providers and RRT to local staff and preventative programs.     

Incidence and treatment of ESRD among indigenous peoples of Australasia

Indigenous people in Australia and New Zealand experience rates of ESKD several times higher than non-indigenous people. This relative rate is highest among people aged 45 - 54 for Aboriginal Australians, and 65 - 74 years for Maori. The majority of this is driven by diabetic nephropathy. Both groups have lesser utilization of transplantation as a renal replacement therapy than non-indigenous comparators, and lesser utilization of home dialysis modalities.     

Increases in renal replacement therapy in Australia and New Zealand: understanding trends in diabetic nephropathy

Aim: The incidence of end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) has been increasing worldwide, with increasing numbers of older people, people with diabetic nephropathy and indigenous people. We investigated the incidence of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in Australia and New Zealand (NZ) to better understand the causes of these effects. Methods: Data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA)registry and relevant population data were used to investigate the incidence of RRT in five demographic groups: Indigenous and non‐indigenous Australians, Māori, Pacific Islanders and other New Zealanders, as well as differences between genders and age groups. Results: The numbers of patients commencing RRT each year increased by 321% between 1990 and 2009. This increase was largely driven by increases in patients with diabetic nephropathy. In 2009 35% of new patients had ESKD resulting from diabetic nephropathy 92% of which were type 2. Indigenous Australians, and Māori and Pacific people of NZ have elevated risks of commencing RRT due to diabetic nephropathy, although the risks compared with non‐indigenous Australians have decreased over time. A small element of lead time bias also contributed to this increase. Males are more likely to commence RRT due to diabetes than females, except among Australian Aborigines, where females are more at risk. There is a marked increase in older, more comorbid patients. Conclusions: Patterns of incident renal replacement therapy strongly reflect the prevalence of diabetes within these groups. In addition, other factors such as reduced risk of dying before reaching ESKD, and increased acceptance of older and sicker patients are also contributing to increases in incidence of RRT.     

Indigenous health: update on the impact of diabetes and chronic kidney disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With respect to chronic diseases such as diabetes and its complications, indigenous populations are known to suffer from poor health outcomes in comparison with whites. The purpose of this review is to highlight recent epidemiologic and intervention studies that have occurred in the areas of diabetes and renal disease among indigenous populations. RECENT FINDINGS: The burden of diabetes is increasing among younger indigenous groups with epidemic levels of end-stage kidney disease. As dialysis therapy has contributed to prolong life among indigenous patients, cardiovascular disease has now become the leading cause of mortality in these populations. Clear preventive intervention strategies to improve rates of progression to end-stage kidney disease are not prevalent nor are they emerging over time. Access to kidney transplantation is also reduced among indigenous populations in Australia, New Zealand, the USA and Canada. Reasons for this disparity are unclear but likely multifactorial. SUMMARY: Diabetes and its complications have produced a health crisis among indigenous populations. The impact on healthcare systems in countries where these indigenous populations reside will be substantial unless significant efforts are made to improve diabetic renal disease outcomes in the near future.     

Frequency,etiology and treatment of childhood end-stage kidney disease in Australia and New Zealand

To describe the trends in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in children in Australia and New Zealand over time and across different ages, we analyzed data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA). A total of 1,485 children aged less than 18 years received renal replacement therapy (RRT) during the period from 1963 to 2006, of which children 55.6% were male. The incidence of ESKD increased over the first two decades but has been stable at 8 per million since the mid-1980s. The prevalence of ESKD continues to increase in all age groups, especially among older children, and is currently 50 per million in those aged less than 18 years. The cause of ESKD over the entire cohort was one-third each for glomerulonephritis (32.5%), structural anomalies (hypoplasia/dysplasia, posterior urethral valves or reflux nephropathy, 35.8%), and cystic disease or other conditions (31.7%). Proportionately, glomerulonephritis is becoming less common. Overall, 50% of children were commenced on peritoneal dialysis as the initial RRT modality, 30% were started on hemodialysis, and 20% underwent transplantation pre-emptively. The proportion of children receiving transplants has not increased over time.     

Timing of nephrology referral: a study of its effects on the likelihood of transplantation and impact on mortality

SUMMARY: Delayed referral of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) to a nephrologist is associated with considerable early morbidity and increased mortality. the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) has collected data regarding the timing of referral to a nephrologist for all patients beginning renal replacement therapy (RRT) since 1 April 1995. We examined survival and likelihood of transplantation for patients who started RRT between 1 April 1995 and 31 December 1998, with follow-up until 31 March 2000 (up to 5 years follow-up). of 4886 patients starting RRT, 1277 (26.1%) were in the late referral (LR) group and 3609 (73.9%) were not (NLR). In a multivariate analysis, predictors of LR were age 0–44 years and the presence of two or more comorbidities. Ninety days after referral, 60% of patients in the LR group were on haemodialysis compared with 55% of patients in the NLR group; 40% of patients in each group were receiving peritoneal dialysis at this time. Patients in the LR group were significantly less likely to receive a transplant in the first year after referral and throughout the duration of the study compared with the NLR group. Mortality rates were 19 and 13 persons per 100 patient years in the LR and NLR groups, respectively. In conclusion, delayed referral to a nephrologist was associated with increased mortality which continued for up to 5 years, even after adjustment for known predictors of mortality including age, sex, comorbidities and primary renal disease.     

Factors influencing reported rates of treated end-stage renal disease

Rates of treated end-stage renal disease have risen relentlessly throughout the Western world over the past 30 years, with little indication of a slowing in the rate. This increase has a number of causes, such as important trends in disease prevalence, changing population structure, and changing treatment patterns. A number of biases also affect measured rates of renal replacement therapy. These biases include lead-time and length bias, as well as classification bias. A further important effect will be changes in competing risks, in particular, changing mortality from cardiovascular disease. We examine the effects of these factors by analyzing data from the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry. Rates of treated ESRD have risen steadily over the past 30 years, which appears to be the result of several factors. Rates among older people have increased particularly, as have rates among Australian and New Zealand indigenous peoples. Higher rates are also seen among some immigrant groups. Accentuating the effect of these changing rates are changes in the structure of the population and the tendency to commence treatment earlier. The increase in rates of ESRD treatment is often ascribed to an explosion of kidney disease. Although a major contribution comes from increasing disease prevalence, understanding the implications of this increase requires comprehension of a number of other factors.     

The incidence of treated end-stage renal disease in New Zealand Maori and Pacific Island people and in Indigenous Australians.

BACKGROUND: Although Indigenous Australians, New Zealand Maori and Pacific Island people comprise an unduly high proportion of patients treated for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the two countries, no population-based age- and disease-specific rates have been published. METHODS: From data provided to the Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA), truncated age- and sex-standardized incidence rates were calculated for treated ESRD due to all causes and by primary renal disease, in four broad age groups of Maori, Pacific Island people and all 'other' New Zealanders and Indigenous and non-indigenous Australians, for the period 1992-2001. RESULTS: The incidence of ESRD did not differ in persons aged 0-14 years. In adults, Maori and Pacific Island people had similar rates of ESRD, a little more than half those of Indigenous Australians except in persons aged 65 years and over in whom the rates were nearly equal, but two to ten times the rates in 'other' New Zealanders and non-indigenous Australians. The excess of ESRD in Indigenous Australians was due principally to type II diabetic nephropathy and glomerulonephritis (all common types except lupus nephritis), but was seen also in respect of type I diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive renal disease and analgesic nephropathy, while the excess in Maori and Pacific Island people was confined to type II diabetic nephropathy, hypertensive renal disease and glomerulonephritis (especially lupus nephritis and type I mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis, but not mesangial IgA disease). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and pattern of treated ESRD differs quantitatively and qualitatively between Maori, Pacific Island people and other New Zealanders, and Indigenous and non-indigenous Australians.     

Comparing mortality of elderly patients on hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis: a propensity score approach

The objective of this study was to evaluate differences in mortality over the first year of renal replacement therapy (RRT) between elderly patients starting treatment on hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD). For the period of 1991 to mid-1996, this study defined an inception cohort of all patients aged >65 yr with new-onset chronic RRT who were New Jersey Medicare and/or Medicaid beneficiaries in the year before RRT and who had been diagnosed with renal disease more than 1 yr before RRT. Propensity scores were calculated for first treatment assignment from a large number of baseline covariates. Mortality was then compared among patients initially assigned to HD versus PD using multivariate 90-d interval Cox models controlled for propensity scores and center stratification. Peritoneal dialysis starters had a 16% higher rate of death during the first 90 d of RRT compared with HD patients (hazard ratio [HR], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.96 to 1.42)]. Mortality did not differ between day 91 and 180 (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.71 to 1.51). Thereafter, PD starters again died at a higher rate (HR, 1.45; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.98). These findings were more pronounced among patients with diabetes. Sensitivity analyses using more stringent criteria to ensure that first treatment choice reflected long-term treatment choice confirmed the presence of an association between PD and mortality. In conclusion, compared with HD, peritoneal dialysis appears to be associated with higher mortality among older patients, particularly among those with diabetes, even after controlling for a large number of risk factors for mortality, propensity scores to control for nonrandom treatment assignment, and center stratification.     

Interpreting incidence trends for treated end-stage renal disease: implications for evaluating disease control in Australia

BACKGROUND: Five sources of change modify trends in incidence of treated end-stage renal disease (ESRD): (i) demography; (ii) disease control, comprising prevention and treatment of progressive kidney disease; (iii) competing risks, which encompass dying from untreated uraemia or non-renal comorbidity; (iv) lead-time bias; and (v) classification bias. Thus, rising crude incidence of treated ESRD may conceal effective disease control when there has been demographic change, lessening competing risks, or the introduction of bias. METHODS: Age-specific incidences of treated ESRD in Australia were calculated from Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant (ANZDATA) Registry data by indigenous/non-indigenous status (all causes) and by primary renal disease (non-indigenous only) for two successive decades, 1982-1991 and 1992-2001. RESULTS: We postulate that less competing risks explained much of the increase in treated ESRD in the elderly and Indigenous Australians. The increase in glomerulonephritic ESRD in non-indigenous Australians could be ascribed mainly to immigration from non-European countries. There was no significant change in incidence of treated ESRD in Indigenous or non-indigenous persons aged less than 25 years, in non-indigenous persons aged 25-64 years for ESRD caused by hereditary polycystic disease or hypertension, or in type 1 diabetics aged over 55 years. End-stage renal disease from analgesic nephropathy had declined. The increase in treated ESRD caused by type 2 diabetic nephropathy appeared to be multifactorial. Lead-time/length bias and less competing risks may have concealed a small favourable trend in other primary renal diseases. CONCLUSION: Whether recent disease control measures have had an impact on incidence of treated ESRD is not yet certain, but seems more likely than implied by previous reports.     

Can we improve early mortality in patients receiving renal replacement therapy?

BACKGROUND: Approximately one in eight patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) die within the first three months of starting renal replacement therapy (RRT). We investigated which factors might improve this early mortality. METHODS: We performed a prospective nationwide study of all patients commencing RRT for ESRD in Scotland over one year. Patients were classified according to how they presented to start RRT, their burden of comorbid diseases, access prepared for dialysis, and duration of care by a nephrologist prior to commencing RRT. Those factors most strongly associated with death within 90 days of commencing treatment were determined by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with an acute unexpected element to their presentation for RRT had early mortality rates between 6.0 and 8.9 times greater than those who commenced RRT electively after a period of care from a nephrologist. Patients in high and medium comorbidity risk groups had early mortality rates of 4.7 and 2.2 times greater than those in the low-risk group. Low serum albumin had a significant association with early death. Patients who progressed steadily to ESRD, who had a planned start to dialysis, and who had mature access were 3.6 times more likely to survive beyond three months than those with no access; they were, however, also younger with less comorbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The factors principally associated with early mortality are nonelective presentation for RRT, comorbid illness, and low serum albumin. Patients cared for by a nephrologist before requiring RRT who have mature access have better short-term survival than those without access. They are also younger with less comorbidity. It may be possible to improve short-term survival in this "unplanned" group if referred early to facilitate reducing cardiovascular risk factors and preparation for RRT.     

Survival of recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants compared with those receiving dialysis treatment in Australia and New Zealand, 1991-2001.

BACKGROUND: Comparison of mortality rates after kidney transplantation with those treated by dialysis is an important factor is assessing treatment options, but is subject to many pitfalls in selection of appropriate control groups, in particular allowing for varying post-operative risk, and recent changes in mortality rates with better immunosuppression and dialysis techniques. We examined the outcomes following cadaveric renal transplantation and compared them with an appropriate control group of dialysis patients, using contemporary national data from Australia and New Zealand and appropriate statistical methods. In particular, we explicitly addressed the changing risks following transplantation, and looked at both younger (low-risk) and older (higher-risk) recipients, and examined the effect of attribution of deaths in the early period following loss of transplant function to the risk of transplantation. METHODS: We performed a cohort study, initially including 11 560 people aged 15-65 years who began treatment for end-stage renal disease in Australia or New Zealand between 1991 and 2000. Of these, 5144 were recorded at least once as on an active cadaveric transplant waiting list. Survival was analysed with Cox regression, including time-dependent covariates to allow for the violation of proportional hazards with changing mortality risks post-operatively. We also performed stratified analyses on low-risk recipients (<50 years, without co-morbidity) and older recipients. RESULTS: There was a clear difference in survival between those on the active transplant waiting list and those not listed. Of those who were on the cadaveric transplant waiting list, 2362 (46%) were transplanted in the period to 30 September 2001. Cadaveric transplantation was associated with an initial increase in mortality [during the first 3 months post-transplantation, adjusted HR 2.0 (1.5-2.7), P<0.001]. This fell below the dialysis group at 6 months [adjusted HR 0.27 (0.16-0.47), P<0.001] and from 12 months post-transplantation, the reduction in risk of mortality was approximately 80% [adjusted HR 0.19 (0.15-0.24), P<0.001]. A secondary analysis showed the excess risk attributed to the period immediately following transplantation was actually due to deaths in the 60 days after loss of transplant function rather than those occurring with a functioning graft. CONCLUSIONS: As well as improved quality of life, cadaveric renal transplantation in Australia and New Zealand is associated with a survival advantage compared with those remaining on the waiting list.     

An expanded nationwide view of chronic kidney disease in Aboriginal Australians

We summarize new knowledge that has accrued in recent years on chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Indigenous Australians. CKD refers to all stages of preterminal kidney disease, including end‐stage kidney failure (ESKF), whether or not a person receives renal replacement therapy (RRT). Recently recorded rates of ESKF, RRT, non‐dialysis CKD hospitalizations and CKD attributed deaths were, respectively, more than sixfold, eightfold, eightfold and threefold those of non‐Indigenous Australians, with age adjustment, although all except the RRT rates are still under‐enumerated. However, the nationwide average Indigenous incidence rate of RRT appears to have stabilized. The median age of Indigenous people with ESKF was about 30 years less than for non‐Indigenous people, and 84% of them received RTT, while only half of non‐Indigenous people with ESKF did so. The first‐ever (2012) nationwide health survey data showed elevated levels of CKD markers in Indigenous people at the community level. For all CKD parameters, rates among Indigenous people themselves were strikingly correlated with increasing remoteness of residence and socio‐economic disadvantage, and there was a female predominance in remote areas. The burden of renal disease in Australian Indigenous people is seriously understated by Global Burden of Disease Mortality methodology, because it employs underlying cause of death only, and because deaths of people on RRT are frequently attributed to non‐renal causes. These data give a much expanded view of CKD in Aboriginal people. Methodologic approaches must be remedied for a full appreciation of the burden, costs and outcomes of the disease, to direct appropriate policy development.     

Report of renal failure treatment in Australia and New Zealand from the dialysis and transplant registry (ANZDATA)

Summary: The Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) has recorded 15675 patients resident in Australia and 2909 patients in New Zealand who have been treated by dialysis and transplantation for end-stage renal failure. the majority of patients have a functioning transplant (51% Australia, 50% New Zealand). Cadaveric organs have been the mainstay of the transplant programme from 1963 to 1993 (91% Australia, 87% New Zealand). In recent years the early graft survival has dramatically improved; the 12 month graft survivals were 74 and 87% in Australia, and 68 and 78% in New Zealand in 1983 and 1992, respectively. A large majority of patients have dialysed at home (49% Australia, 84% New Zealand) or with low level assistance in facilities remote from tertiary level hospital renal units (21% Australia). While most patients use haemodialysis (64% Australia, 41% New Zealand), continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis is the predominant form of dialysis in the home (63% Australia, 70% New Zealand). the demographic analysis displays a slight predominance of males (55.5% Australia, 50.4% New Zealand), and a steadily increasing number of patients over 65 years old (31% Australia, 15% New Zealand), and of diabetics (16% Australia, 31% New Zealand). Aborigines, Maoris and Pacific Islanders have a strikingly higher rate of renal failure per million population than the Caucasoid/Europid population. Certain causes of renal failure such as excess analgesic ingestion and malignant hypertension have declined. Glomerulonephritis has been the most common cause of renal failure in Australia (33%), diabetic nephropathy the most common in New Zealand (31%).     

Interfaces between cardiovascular and kidney disease among Aboriginal Australians

Rates of kidney disease among several indigenous groups have been shown to be substantially higher than corresponding non-indigenous groups. This excess has been clearly shown among Aboriginal Australians with respect to both end-stage kidney disease and early kidney disease. Rates of cardiovascular disease among Aboriginal Australians are also very high, as are rates of diabetes, smoking, and possibly overweight and obesity. These factors have been traditionally linked with cardiovascular and renal disease as part of a broader "metabolic syndrome." However, the links and interfaces between cardiovascular and kidney disease in this environment extend beyond these "traditional" factors. The factors associated with atherosclerosis have expanded in recent years to include markers of inflammation, some infection, antioxidants, and other "non-traditional" risk factors. Given the high rates of acute infection and poor living conditions endured by many indigenous people, one might expect these "non-traditional" risk factors to be highly prevalent. In this review, we explore the relationships between markers of inflammation, some serological markers of infection, and other selected markers and both cardiovascular and renal disease. In doing so, we demonstrate links between kidney and cardiovascular disease at a number of levels, beyond the "traditional" cardiovascular/renal risk factors. Many of these factors are beyond the control of the individual or even community; addressing these issues a broader focus and biopsychosocial model.     

Impact of graft failure on patient survival on dialysis: a comparison of transplant-naive and post-graft failure mortality rates.

BACKGROUND: While the number of patients returning to dialysis after graft failure (GF) is increasing steadily, the impact of a failed kidney transplant on mortality among dialysis patients has not been studied well. METHODS: Data from the Canadian Organ Replacement Register were utilized to examine the outcomes of an incident cohort of patients (n = 25,632) initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT) between 1990 and 1998. Cox regression was used to compare covariate-adjusted mortality among five RRT categories: transplant-naive dialysis, cadaveric primary renal transplant, living-donor primary renal transplant, post-GF dialysis and retransplant. RRT category-specific hazard ratios (HR) were estimated using Cox regression and adjusting for age, sex, race, calendar period, primary renal diagnosis and comorbid conditions. RESULTS: Mortality among post-GF dialysis patients was approximately equal to that of transplant-naive patients (HR = 0.90; P = 0.30) while the HR for retransplanted patients was significantly decreased, relative to the transplant-naive group (HR = 0.35; P<0.01). Diabetes was found to be a significantly (P<0.01) stronger mortality risk factor among post-GF dialysis patients (HR = 3.71) compared with the transplant-naive group (HR = 1.73). In the post-GF group, cardiovascular disease (HR = 1.66) and 'other serious illness' (HR = 2.07) were found to be much stronger risk factors for mortality than in the transplant-naive group (HR = 1.33 and 1.43, respectively), although the differences failed to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that transplant-naive and post-GF dialysis patients have equivalent mortality risk and that mortality is significantly reduced upon retransplantation. In addition, the results highlight the importance of diabetes and, possibly, comorbid conditions as potential modifiable risk factors in the management of post-GF dialysis patients.     

Different Risk Factors and Causes for Early Death after Initiating Dialysis in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients

The mortality of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is especially high after the start of dialysis therapy, especially in diabetic patients. A part of these patients die within three months after initiating renal replacement therapy (RRT). In the present retrospective study we evaluated all patients with ESRD requiring RRT who died within 3 months after initiating the first RRT. A total of 42 patients who died such early after the start of dialysis treatment during the years 1995–2001 were included in the study. Of them, 28 subjects (age 66 + 11 years) were diabetics and 14 non-diabetics (age 76 + 10 years). Indications for the start of dialysis were end-stage renal failure (creatinine clearance < 10–12 mL/min or < 12–14 mL/min in diabetic patients) or fluid lung associated with chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance < 20 mL/min). Hyperhydration with fluid lung was the most common indication for dialysis therapy in patients with diabetes (64.3% versus 14.3%, p < 0.05). The vascular risk factors blood pressure and serum-lipids were similar in both groups; however, diabetic patients were younger than non-diabetic subjects. The prevalence of vascular diseases tended to be higher in the diabetic group, but difference was not significant (see ). Severe heart failure (NYHA stage III-IV) was more common among diabetics (42.8% versus 14.3%, p < 0.05). The incidence of sepsis (17.9% versus 14.3%) did not significantly differ between the groups. The most common cause of death was cardiovascular events in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients (71.5% and 64.2%, respectively). Heart failure was a more common cause of death in diabetic patients (39.2% versus 21.4%, NS). In conclusion, early death after the initiation of dialysis treatment was more common in patients with type 2 diabetes, though, the diabetic patients were less old. In the diabetic group fluid lung was more often indication for initiating dialysis therapy than in the non-diabetic group. In both, diabetic and non-diabetic patients, the most common causes of death are cardiovascular events.     

Acute kidney injury: Epidemiology,outcomes, complications,and therapeutic strategies

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is one of the most common serious complications for all hospital admissions, with its incidence increasing among hospitalized patients, particularly those in the intensive care unit. Despite significant improvements in critical care and dialysis technology, AKI is associated with an increased risk of short‐ and long‐term mortality, prolonged hospital stays, and dialysis dependence. These risks are particularly relevant for critically ill patients with AKI severe enough to require renal replacement therapy (RRT). No specific pharmacologic treatment has been established to treat AKI. Hence, the mainstay treatment for patients with AKI is RRT even though there are still several problematic issues regarding its use including RRT modality, dose, and timing. Recently, the impact of AKI on an increased risk of progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end‐stage renal disease requiring dialysis or transplantation is attracting increased attention.     

The impact of severe acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy on survival and renal function of heart transplant recipients – a UK cohort study

Severe acute kidney injury (AKI), defined as requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), is associated with higher mortality postheart transplantation, but its long-term renal consequences are not known. Anonymized data of 3365 patients, who underwent heart transplantation between 1995 and 2017, were retrieved from the UK Transplant Registry. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for severe AKI requiring RRT, Kaplan–Meier analysis to compare survival and renal function deterioration of the RRT and non-RRT groups, and multivariable Cox regression model to identify predicting factors of mortality and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). 26.0% of heart recipients received RRT post-transplant. The RRT group has lower survival rates at all time points, especially in the immediate post-transplant period. However, conditional on 3 months survival, older age, diabetes and coronary heart disease, but not post-transplant RRT, were the risk factors for long-term survival. The predicting factors for ESRD were insulin-dependent diabetes, renal function at transplantation, eGFR decline in the first 3 months post-transplant, post-transplant severe AKI and transplantation era. Severe AKI requiring RRT post-transplant is associated with worse short-term survival, but has no impact on long-term mortality. It also accelerates recipients’ renal function deterioration in the long term.     

Renal replacement therapy for diabetic end-stage renal disease: data from 10 registries in Europe (1991-2000)

BACKGROUND: There is concern about the rising prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and of the resultant nephropathy. This study uses data from the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association (ERA-EDTA) Registry to provide information on the epidemiology and outcome of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to diabetic nephropathy (DN). METHODS: Data from the following 10 registries: Austria, French-speaking Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Greece, Norway, Scotland (UK), Catalonia (Spain), Sweden, and The Netherlands were combined. Average annual changes (%) were estimated by Poisson regression. Analyses of mortality were performed by Cox regression. RESULTS: An increase in patients with type 2 DN entering RRT has been observed (+11.9% annually, P < 0.05), while large differences in RRT incidence in this disease continue to exist between countries in Europe. There was a reduction in mortality during the first 2 years on dialysis therapy among patients with type 2 DN (AHR 0.96, 95%CI 0.94-0.97 annually). The mortality among transplant recipients decreased for both type 1 DN and nondiabetic ESRD (non DN) within the 1995-1998 cohort (type 1 DN: AHR 0.49, 95% CI 0.35-0.68; non DN: AHR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90) compared to the 1991-1994 cohort. CONCLUSION: This report has shown that during the last decade there has been a marked increase in the incidence of RRT for type 2 DN. Survival analysis showed that over the period 1991-1999 the mortality rates of all dialysis patients and of type 1 diabetic and nondiabetic renal transplant recipients have fallen.