Correction of myopia of 7 to 24 diopters with the Artisan phakic intraocular lens: two-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the iris claw phakic intraocular lens (Artisan; Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands) in patients with high myopia. METHODS: Between May 1999 and July 2001, 93 Artisan phakic intraocular lenses (IOLs) were implanted in 60 patients affected by high myopia. All patients underwent 24-month follow-up. The power of the lenses ranged from -7.5 to -22.0 diopters (D). Patients were divided into two groups: group 1 (68 eyes), myopia -6.75 to -15.50 D (SE), and group 2 (25 eyes), myopia -16.0 to -23.0 D (SE). Pre- and postoperative patient evaluation included manifest and cycloplegic refractions, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), endothelial cell count, intraocular pressure, complication rate, safety, and efficacy. RESULTS: At 4 months, 83.8% (57/68) (group 1, myopia -6.75 to -15.50 D) and 68% (17/25) (group 2, myopia -16.0 to -23.0 D) of eyes achieved UCVA of > or =20/40. The BSCVA remained the same or improved in 100% of eyes. After 4 months, 69.1% (47/68) of eyes in group 1 and 52% (13/25) of eyes in group 2 were within +/-1.00 D of the desired refraction; the mean refraction was stable between 4 and 24 months. Of the intraoperative complications, 69.2% were observed in the first 25 lenses implanted; postoperative complications included iris atrophy in 11.8% (11/93), lens decentration in 5.4% (5/93), and night glare in 6.4% (6/93) of eyes. No IOLs were removed. Mean endothelial cell loss was 2.8% at 4 months, 3.9% at 12 months, and 5.4% at 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our results regarding implantation of the Artisan phakic IOL confirm that these lenses are safe and effective for the correction of high myopia, with a stable refractive outcome but with a higher than normal rate of endothelial cell loss during 2-year follow-up.     

Refractive lens exchange versus iris-claw Artisan phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia

PURPOSE: To study a paired-match comparison between refractive lens exchange with pseudophakic IOL implant (RLE) and Artisan phakic IOL for high hyperopia. METHODS: Nineteen eyes (12 patients, 20 to 41 years old) with an Artisan phakic IOL (Model 203: 1.00-D increment) for hyperopia from +2.75 to +9.25 D were matched to 19 eyes (15 patients, 26 to 46 yr) with hyperopia from +2.75 to +7.50 D, who had refractive lens exchange (pseudophakic IOL implantation; lenses: 0.50-D increment). Average paired-match difference was 1.13 D and 7.7 years of age. RESULTS: At 1 month after surgery, 84% of refractive lens exchange/pseudophakic IOL eyes and 94% of Artisan phakic IOL eyes had a spherical equivalent refraction within +/- 1.00 D of emmetropia; 58% and 68% of eyes, respectively, were within +/- 0.50 D (P = .97). No eye lost lines of best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) and no significant changes in BSCVA were found in any eye at 1 month after surgery (P = .17). The percentage of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/40 or better improved from 79% to 89% of eyes at 1 to 2 months after phakic IOL; it remained at 89% to 82% of eyes from 1 to 2 months after refractive lens exchange/ pseudophakic IOL. The coefficient of correlation showed statistically better accuracy (intended vs. achieved refraction; P = .035) for the Artisan phakic IOL (R = 0.83) than for refractive lens exchange/ pseudophakic IOL (R = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: Spherical equivalent refraction outcome and BSCVA after surgery were similar for both procedures. The Artisan phakic IOL in carefully selected patients provided a better overall outcome for young patients with high hyperopia whose accommodation was preserved, as compared to refractive lens exchange.     

Toric phakic intraocular lens for the correction of hyperopia and astigmatism

PURPOSE: To evaluate the Artisan toric phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) for the correction of hyperopia and astigmatism. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Department of Ophthalmology, Sint Truiden, Belgium. METHODS: In this prospective study of 47 eyes of 28 patients with hyperopia and astigmatism, Artisan toric pIOLs were implanted between April 1999 and June 2004. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity, refraction, astigmatism, safety, and predictability were analyzed. Change in astigmatism was analyzed with vector analysis. Refractive cylinders are expressed in minus form. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was +4.33 diopters (D) +/- 2.26 (SD). Mean follow-up was 11.1 months (range 6 to 36 months). A gain of 1 or more lines in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was seen in 36.2%. Safety index and efficacy index after 6 months were 1.06 and 0.87, respectively. The mean postoperative astigmatism at 6 months was 0.19 D at an axis of 144 degrees. At 6 months, about three quarters (76.6%) of the eyes had a UCVA of 20/40 or better. One eye lost 2 lines of BSCVA. In 1 eye, the lens position had to be changed because of a large axis misalignment. No serious complications developed in any of the treated eyes during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Artisan toric pIOLs can correct moderate to high hyperopia combined with astigmatism with good refractive results. In this study, there were no serious complications. However, the predictability of the refractive results appeared to be lower than those in the correction of myopia and astigmatism with toric Artisan lenses.     

Phakic refractive lens (Medennium) for correction of +4.00 to +6.00 diopters: 1-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To study the efficacy and safety of phakic refractive lens (PRL) implantation to correct high hyperopia. METHODS: Inclusion criteria for this prospective, observer-masked, interventional study were spherical equivalent > or =+4.00 diopters (D) of cycloplegic hyperopia, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) > or =0.5, anterior chamber depth > or =3 mm, and mesopic pupil size < or =6 mm. Lenses were implanted in all cases under regional anesthesia using forceps. RESULTS: Sixteen eyes of nine patients were included in the study. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +5.65+/-1.41 D (range: +3.25 to +5.75 D). Mean 1-year postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was +0.07+/-0.43 D (range: -0.50 to 0.75 D). Fifteen (93.75%) eyes were within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia, and 16 (100%) eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia. Safety and efficacy indexes were 0.9 and 0.8, respectively. Eight (50%) eyes needed LASIK to correct residual astigmatism. Five (31.25%) eyes lost one line of BSCVA; no eye lost two or more lines of BSCVA. The BSCVA did not increase in any eye. No significant intraocular complications developed. CONCLUSIONS: Phakic refractive lens implantation to correct high hyperopia seems to be a safe and accurate procedure. A mild but significant loss in BSCVA can be anticipated.     

Combined surgery to correct high myopia: iris claw phakic intraocular lens and laser in situ keratomileusis.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of combined surgery, implantation of an Artisan phakic iris claw intraocular lens (IOL) followed by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct high myopia. METHODS: A prospective study of 6 patients (8 eyes) with high myopia who had Artisan phakic IOL implantation followed by LASIK was undertaken. The IOL was a standard -15.00-D, 6-mm diameter optical zone. Residual refractive error was corrected by LASIK. Mean follow-up was 16 +/- 4 months (range, 12 to 20 mo). RESULTS: After the second procedure (LASIK), uncorrected visual acuity ranged from 0.4 to 0.63 (mean, 0.5 +/- 0.07) at 1 month and from 0.6 to 0.7 (mean, 0.62 +/- 0.04) at 12 months. Spectacle-corrected visual acuity improved 2 or more lines in 62.5% (5 eyes) from preoperative values. Mean postoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -0.68 +/- 0.23 at 1 month and -0.35 +/- 0.22 at 12 months after LASIK. All eyes were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia following the LASIK portion of the two-stage procedure and 5 eyes were within +/-0.50 D. We had no major complications. No significant endothelial damage occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The accurate refractive outcome, absence of major complications, stability of results, and most important, improvement in quality of vision (defined as no change in vision when illumination conditions varied, eg, at night) experienced by these highly myopic patients are reasons to continue using and improving this combined technique.     

Hyperopic LASIK with Esiris/Schwind technology

PURPOSE: To investigate the refractive and visual outcomes of hyperopic LASIK using Esiris/Schwind technology. METHODS: This retrospective non-comparative observational study included 106 eyes (65 patients) operated with the Esiris/Schwind laser for hyperopia. Eyes were divided into two groups: group 1, < or = +3.99 diopters (D) and group 2, > or = +4.0 D (up to +7.0 D). Visual outcome for distance and near uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuities (BSCVA) (decimal values), cycloplegic refraction, keratometry (K), pachymetry, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: In group 1, mean UCVA was 0.4 +/- 0.1 preoperatively and 0.8 +/- 0.2 6 months postoperatively. Mean BSCVA was 0.9 +/- 0.1 preoperatively and 0.9 +/- 0.1 6 months postoperatively. Safety index was 1.1 and efficacy index was 0.97. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was +2.33 +/- 0.9 D preoperatively and +0.3 +/- 0.3 D 6 months postoperatively. Mean K reading was 43.7 +/- 1.1 D preoperatively and 45.0 +/- 1.6 D 6 months postoperatively. In group 2, mean UCVA was 0.3 +/- 0.1 preoperatively and 0.8 +/- 0.2 6 months postoperatively. Mean BSCVA was 0.9 +/- 0.1 preoperatively and 0.9 +/- 0.1 6 months postoperatively. Safety index was 0.98 and efficacy index was 0.92. Mean spherical equivalent refraction was +5.1 +/- 0.9 D preoperatively and +0.4 +/- 0.5 D 6 months postoperatively. Mean K reading was 43.1 +/- 1.6 D preoperatively and 46.0 +/- 1.4 D 6 months postoperatively. Forty-six (90.2%) of 51 eyes in group 1 and 47 (85.5%) of 55 eyes in group 2 were within +/- 0.5 D of emmetropia. At 6-month follow-up, 40 (78%) of 51 eyes in group 1 had UCVA of 20/20 compared to 41 (75%) of 51 eyes in group 2. One (2%) of 51 eyes in group 1 and 4 (7.3%) of 55 eyes in group 2 lost < or = 2 lines of BSCVA. No eye lost >2 lines of BSCVA. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperopic LASIK with Esiris/Schwind technology is effective and safe in the correction of hyperopia up to + 7.0 D. Although a slight statistical significance was found for low hyperopia, visual and refractive results obtained in high hyperopia were encouraging.     

Toric phakic intraocular lens: European multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, complications, and patient satisfaction after implantation of Artisan toric phakic intraocular lenses (TPIOLs) for the correction of myopia or hyperopia with astigmatism. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, comparative (self-controlled) multicenter trial. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy eyes of 53 patients (mean, 35 years; range, 22-59 years) with preoperative spherical equivalent between +6.50 and -21.25 diopters (D) and cylinder between 1.50 and 7.25 D. METHODS: Seventy eyes underwent implantation of a TPIOL with an optical zone of 5.0 mm (Artisan, Ophtec, Groningen, The Netherlands). The dioptric power of the intraocular lens was calculated by considering refraction, keratometry, and anterior chamber depth. The follow-up was 6 months in all cases. Lenses were available in powers ranging from +12.0 D to -23.5 D (spherical equivalent) in 0.5-D increments, with additional cylinder from 1.0 D to 7.0 D, also in 0.5-D increments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main parameters assessed were best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refraction, endothelial cell count (ECC), intraocular pressure, slit-lamp biomicroscopy, indirect ophthalmoscopy, subjective complaints, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Eyes were divided into group A, myopia (n = 48), with an average preoperative spherical equivalent of -8.90 +/- 4.52 D, and group B, hyperopia (n = 22), with an average preoperative spherical equivalent of +3.25 +/- 1.98 D. No eyes in either group experienced a loss in BSCVA, and 46 eyes gained 1 or more lines of their preoperative BSCVA. In 62 eyes (88.6%), UCVA was 20/40 or better. There was a significant reduction in spherical errors and astigmatism in all cases after surgery. All eyes of both groups were within +/-1.00 D of target refraction, and 51 eyes (72.9%) were within +/-0.50 D of target refraction. There was a 4.5% mean total loss of ECC during the first 6 months. No serious complications were observed. Overall patient satisfaction was very high. CONCLUSIONS: Six-month clinical trial results demonstrate that implantation of the Artisan TPIOL safely, predictably, and effectively reduced or eliminated high ametropia and astigmatism with one procedure. The refractive effect was stable at 6 months after surgery.     

Medennium posterior chamber phakic refractive lens to correct high myopia

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and safety of phakic refractive lens implantation to correct high myopia. METHODS: In this prospective study, a phakic refractive lens was implanted in 90 myopic eyes in which refractive errors ranged from -6.00 to -20.00 diopters (D) and laser refractive surgery was contraindicated. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest and cycloplegic refractions, and intraocular pressure (IOP) were assessed during a 1-year follow-up period. Possible complications, including endothelial cell counts, were evaluated. RESULTS: Spherical equivalent refraction measurements revealed a significant change from the preoperative mean value of -11.90+/-5.00 D to 0.04+/-0.20 D 1 year postoperatively (P=.001). The UCVA and BSCVA significantly improved postoperatively (P=.001 and P=.01, respectively). Seventy-two (80%) eyes and 61 (68%) eyes were within +/-1.00 D and +/-0.50 D of the target refraction, respectively. A significant increase in IOP was found at every postoperative visit (P=.01). There was a trend toward decreased endothelial cell density postoperatively, although the difference did not reach significance. No major complications were found during the 1-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of a phakic refractive lens seems to be a predictable and well-tolerated procedure for correcting high myopia. Complications such as development of cataract, implant dislocation, decreases in endothelial cell counts, or development of glaucoma did not occur in this study.     

Iris-claw phakic (Artisan) lens to correct high myopia

PURPOSE: To assess the safety and efficacy of the iris claw phakic (6mm Artisan lens) in patients with high myopia. METHODS: Twenty-five eyes with myopia of -7.50 to 16D were implanted with a 6mm artisan lens and followed for 24 months. RESULTS: The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was 13.08+/-3.44D at one year. Mean operative spherical equivalent refraction was 0. 77+/-0.57D and 81.8% of eyes had a spherical equivalent refraction within +/-1.00D. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity was maintained or improved in 62.5% of cases. No iritis or cataract or glaucoma was observed. CONCLUSION: Implantation with the 6mm Artisan lens is an effective method for reducing or correcting myopia up to -16D. Gains in spectacle corrected visual acuity were common, and results suggested good predictability. Because of the incomplete follow up, we cannot draw conclusions about the long term safety of the 6mm Artisan lens.     

Iris-fixated toric phakic intraocular lens: Three-year follow-up

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 3-year safety, efficacy, predictability, and stability of iris-fixated toric phakic intraocular lens (pIOL) implantation for the correction of myopia or hyperopia with astigmatism. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, and Department of Ophthalmology, University Clinic, Bochum, Germany. METHODS: A prospective clinical trial of 40 eyes of 23 patients with high ametropia and astigmatism was conducted. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), uncorrected visual acuity, refraction, astigmatism, intraocular pressure, slitlamp biomicroscopy, and indirect ophthalmoscopy were measured preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Of the 40 eyes, 28 were myopic and 12 were hyperopic. Three years postoperatively, 70% of eyes were within +/-1.00 diopter (D) of the targeted refraction. In the myopic group, mean preoperative BSCVA was 20/40 and improved postoperatively to 20/25. Sixty-six percent of eyes gained 1 or more lines from the preoperative BSCVA. The mean cylinder decreased from -3.58 D +/- 1.26 (SD) preoperatively to -1.15 +/- 1.01 D postoperatively. In the hyperopic group, preoperative BSCVA was 20/25 and improved to 20/20 postoperatively. Thirty-six percent of eyes gained 1 or more lines from the preoperative BSCVA. The mean cylinder decreased from -3.37 +/- 0.88 D to -1.53 +/- 0.69 D postoperatively. The correction was stable in all eyes 3 years after surgery. No potentially sight-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSION: The 3-year follow-up showed the iris-fixated toric pIOL was effective in correcting high ametropia and astigmatism.     

Outcome after treatment of ametropia with implantable contact lenses

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term results after insertion of implantable contact lenses (ICLs) in phakic eyes. DESIGN: Prospective, noncomparative, interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy-five phakic eyes (65 myopic, 10 hyperopic eyes) of 45 patients aged 21.7 to 60.6 years were included. INTERVENTION: STAAR Collamer Implantable Contact Lenses (STAAR Surgical Inc., Nidau, Switzerland) were implanted for correction of high myopia and hyperopia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and intraocular pressure (IOP) were determined. Presence of lens opacification and the distance between the ICL and the crystalline lens were assessed by slit-lamp examination before surgery and at 1, 3, 6 months, and yearly after lens implantation. RESULTS: Preoperative mean spherical equivalent was -16.23+/-5.29 diopters (D) for myopic eyes and +7.88 +/-1.46 D for hyperopic eyes. After ICL implantation, mean residual refractive error was -1.77+/-2.17 D in myopic patients and +0.44+/-0.69 D in hyperopic patients. Preoperative mean UCVA was Snellen 0.03+/-0.03 for myopic patients and Snellen 0.12+/-0.16 for hyperopic patients. Preoperative mean BCVA was Snellen 0.49+/-0.23 for myopic patients and Snellen 0.82+/-0.23 for hyperopic patients. After ICL implantation, mean UCVA up to the end of individual observation time was Snellen 0.36+/-0.36 for myopic patients and Snellen 0.58+/-0.28 for hyperopic patients. Mean BCVA was Snellen 0.73+/-0.26 for myopic and Snellen 0.80+/-0.24 for hyperopic patients. Mean preoperative IOP was 14.2+/-2.7 mmHg, and mean postoperative IOP was 13.46+/-2.1 mmHg over all follow-up investigations. The main complication was the development of subcapsular anterior opacifications of the crystalline lens in 25 eyes (33.3%), 2 of which showed direct contact to the ICL. Eleven eyes (14.7%) were stable in opacification and 14 eyes (18.7%) had progressive opacifications. The median time to opacification was 27.1 months. In 8 patients (10.7%), the subjective visual impairment mandated cataract surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The most significant long-term complication after ICL implantation is the formation of opacifications of the crystalline lens with the risk of the necessity of subsequent cataract surgery (10.7%). Old age, female gender, and contralateral opacification are independent significant risk factors for early formation of opacifications in this patient group.     

A randomized paired eye comparison of two techniques for treating moderately high myopia: LASIK and artisan phakic lens

OBJECTIVE: To compare refractive performance and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and Artisan phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) for moderately high myopia. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized trial with paired eye control. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-five patients with myopia ranging from -8.00 to -12.00 diopters (D). INTERVENTION: For each patient, one eye received LASIK and the other one was implanted with an Artisan phakic intraocular lens. The treated eye and the surgical technique were randomized. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was spherical equivalent refraction. Main secondary outcome measures were the change of two or more lines and safety index (ratio postoperative to preoperative best-corrected visual acuity). RESULTS: One year after surgery, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.74 +/- 0.67 D for LASIK-treated eyes and -0.95 +/- 0.45 D for Artisan-treated eyes, and the majority of LASIK-treated eyes (64%) and Artisan-treated eyes (60%) were within +/-1.00 D of the intended result. At 1 month, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was -0.28 +/- 0.71 D for LASIK and -1.07 +/- 0.59 D for Artisan (P < 0.01). The changes of two or more lines were in favor of Artisan (P < 0.05). The safety index was significantly better for Artisan (1.12 +/- 0.21) than for LASIK (0.99 +/- 0.17) at 1 year (P < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In cases of moderately high myopia, LASIK and Artisan phakic intraocular lenses seemed to produce a similar predictability. The best-corrected visual acuity and subjective evaluation of quality of vision were better for Artisan.     

Artisan iris-claw phakic intraocular lens followed by laser in situ keratomileusis for high hyperopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, complications, and patient satisfaction after Artisan phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation followed by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of high hyperopia. SETTING: Instituto Oftalmólogico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: This prospective trial included 39 eyes with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) of 7.39 diopters (D) +/- 1.30 (SD) and a cylinder between 0 and -4.25 D. The Artisan iris-fixated phakic IOL (Ophtec) for hyperopia was implanted, and LASIK was performed 6 to 8 months later. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refraction, endothelial cell loss (ECL), endothelium morphologic analysis, and patient satisfaction were recorded. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: At 1 year, 37 eyes (94.9%) were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and 31 eyes (79.5%) were within +/-0.50 D. Thirty-five eyes (89.7%) achieved a UCVA of 0.5 or better. There was a statistically significant decrease in BCVA after phakic IOL implantation, but this effect was corrected after LASIK. Nine eyes (23.1%) lost 1 line of BCVA; 7 eyes (17.9%) gained at least 1 line. One eye (2.6%) showed a change in SE greater than 1.0 D over the follow-up period. The mean ECL was 10.9%, but morphologic analysis suggested no additional damage caused by LASIK over that produced by phakic IOL surgery. Overall patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Artisan phakic IOL implantation and LASIK safely, predictably, and effectively reduced high hyperopia. A loss of 1 line of BCVA should be expected in about one third of eyes implanted with this IOL. Halos and glare at night remain a potential problem.     

LASIK in children with hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of LASIK for hyperopia in pediatric eyes with amblyopia resulting from anisometropia. METHODS: Thirty-two children with anisometropic amblyopia in whom conventional therapy was unsuccessful underwent unilateral LASIK between 1999 and 2005. Mean patient age was 10.3 +/- 3.1 years (range: 4 to 15 years), and mean follow-up was 20.1 +/- 15.1 months (range: 12 to 60 months). At the last follow-up examination, spherical equivalent refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), and complications were recorded. RESULTS: Mean preoperative and postoperative manifest spherical equivalent refraction of the treated eyes was 5.17 +/- 1.65 and 1.39 +/- 1.21 diopters (D), respectively (P < .01). Mean UCVA was 0.06 +/- 0.09 (range: 0.01 to 0.5) preoperatively and 0.27 +/- 0.23 (range: 0.05 to 0.8) postoperatively (P < .01). Mean BSCVA was 0.20 +/- 0.17 (range: 0.01 to 0.8) preoperatively and 0.35 +/- 0.25 (range: 0.1 to 1.0) postoperatively (P < .01). Six eyes gained > or = 4 lines of BSCVA, 4 eyes gained 2 to 3 lines, 12 eyes gained 1 line, and 9 eyes were unchanged; only 1 eye lost 1 line of BSCVA due to haze in the flap-stroma interface. None of the patients reported halos or glare. There were no intraoperative or postoperative flap complications. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK seems to be an effective and safe procedure for the management of hyperopic anisometropic amblyopia in select cases. Visual acuity improved in the amblyopic eyes and was associated with decreased anisometropia. The refractive response to hyperopic LASIK in children appears to be similar to that of adults with comparable refractive errors.     

Hyperopic LASIK retreatments with the Technolas laser

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and predictability of hyperopic LASIK retreatments. METHODS: This retrospective, consecutive, non-comparative, observational study included 85 eyes that underwent hyperopic LASIK retreatment with 1-year follow-up. Complete ophthalmic examination included distance uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), cycloplegic refraction, and pachymetry. Patients were divided into two groups according to the preoperative spherical equivalent refraction: group 1, < or = +3.9 diopters (D) and group 2, > or = +4.0 D. RESULTS: The UCVA improved from 0.31 +/- 0.2 to 0.7 +/- 0.2 in group 1 and from 0.2 +/- 0.2 to 0.6 +/- 0.2 in group 2 following retreatment. Mean spherical equivalent refraction improved from +2.8 +/- 0.85 to +0.2 +/- 0.9 in group 1 and from +5.3 +/- 0.9 to +0.3 +/- 1.3 in group 2 after retreatment. In group 1, 32 (72.7%) of 44 eyes had BSCVA > or = 20/25, and in group 2, 24 (58.5%) of 41 eyes had BSCVA > or = 20/25. After primary hyperopic LASIK, 25 (56.8%) of 44 eyes in group 1 and 19 (46.3%) of 41 eyes in group 2 maintained BSCVA or gained > or = 1 lines postoperatively in contrast to 21 (47.7%) of 44 eyes in group 1 and 22 (53.9%) of 41 eyes in group 2 after retreatment. In group 1, 11 (25%) of 44 eyes lost > or = 2 lines of BSCVA after initial hyperopic LASIK compared to 14 (31.8%) of 44 eyes after retreatment. In group 2, 10 (24.4%) of 41 eyes lost > or = 2 lines of BSCVA after initial hyperopic LASIK compared to 12 (29.2%) of 41 eyes after retreatment. After hyperopic LASIK retreatment, 31 (70.5%) of 44 eyes in group 1 and 19 (46.4%) of 41 eyes in group 2 were within +/- 0.5 D of emmetropia. Safety was 0.9 in both groups and efficacy was 0.8 and 0.7 in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Complications included epithelial ingrowth of 1 to 3 mm (30%) and flap edge melting (2%). CONCLUSIONS: Hyperopic LASIK retreatment improved the refractive results of initial hyperopic LASIK surgery with 20% to 30% of eyes gaining > or = 1 lines of BSCVA. The loss of BSCVA was greater after primary hyperopic LASIK than after retreatment.     

Videokeratography in conductive keratoplasty

PURPOSE: We used EyeSys videokeratography to evaluate corneal shape changes induced by conductive keratoplasty, a procedure that utilizes radio frequency energy to alter corneal shape to correct hyperopia. METHODS: Follow-up data were available for 19 eyes (out of 24 eyes of 13 patients). Preoperative spherical hyperopia ranged from +0.75 to +3.25 D with astigmatism <0.75 D. Manifest refractive spherical equivalent refraction (MRSE), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), topographical parameter predicted corneal acuity (PCA), corneal uniformity index (CU Index), regular astigmatism, total astigmatism, average simulated keratometry (Avg Sim K), effective refractive power, and asphericity were measured preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Twelve months postoperatively, mean PCA, CU Index, and BSCVA were maintained at preoperative levels. Mean UCVA (LogMAR) improved from 0.53+/-0.21 to 0.10+/-0.19 (P<.05) with a mean MRSE change from +1.62+/-0.76 D to -0.06+/-0.84 D (P<.05) from preoperative to 12 months postoperative. Mean asphericity increased +0.044+/-0.24 D (P>.05), mean Avg Sim K increased 1.88+/-0.72 D (P<.05), mean effective refractive power increased 1.71+/-0.79 D (P<.05), mean cylinder (cycloplegic refraction) increased 0.19+/-0.36 D (P<.05), mean regular astigmatism increased 0.25+/-0.49 D (P>.05), and mean irregular astigmatism decreased 0.01+/-0.13 D (P>.05) from preoperative to 12 months after conductive keratoplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Avg Sim K and effective refractive power changes support the refractive results; 12-month postoperative maintenance of BSCVA, PCA, and CU Index suggest the procedure is safe. Conductive keratoplasty induced a slight regular astigmatism in some eyes, which decreased with time. The increase in mean corneal asphericity indicated possible induction of central and peripheral cornea changes.     

Traumatic dislocation of an Ophtec Artisan phakic intraocular lens

PURPOSE: To report a case of a traumatic dislocation of an Ophtec Artisan phakic anterior chamber intraocular lens. METHODS: Retrospective case review. RESULTS: A 38-year-old female underwent successful implantation of an Ophtec Artisan lens in her left eye as part of the phase III U.S. clinical trials. Approximately 5 months postoperatively, the patient was struck with a roll of packing tape in her left eye and noted immediate decreased vision. Following the blunt trauma, the patient had an uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/60 and a best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/20. The wound was intact, however, the superior claw was no longer enclaved to the iris and the lens had dislocated nasally with the optic of the lens resting in the angle. The patient was taken back to the operating room, the lens was repositioned, and the superior claw was re-enclaved to the iris. One week after repositioning, UCVA was 20/30 and BSCVA was 20/20. CONCLUSION: Despite adequate positioning, significant trauma may result in the iris claw tearing free from the iris with dislocation of the Artisan lens. The lens may be repositioned with good visual outcome, however, the long-term effects on endothelial cell density in this patient remain to be seen.     

准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术治疗儿童高度远视屈光参差性弱视的效果

目的评价准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（LASIK）矫治儿童高度远视性屈光参差的安全性、有效性、可预测性和稳定性,并探讨其对术后弱视治疗效果的影响。方法采用前瞻性自身对照法观察42例高度远视屈光参差性弱视儿童病例,年龄范围6～14岁。使用SVS Apex plus准分子激光系统（其中联合L型mask盘矫正单纯远视9例,联合P型mask盘矫正远视合并散光12例）及鹰视世纪波准分子激光系统（21例）,在局部麻醉或全身麻醉下对患儿高度远视眼行LASIK,术后进行弱视治疗。术后对视力、屈光度和双眼视功能进行分析。随访时间6～24个月。结果矫治屈光度数为＋3．00-＋7．50D,术后2年66．6％术眼残余屈光度数在预计矫正屈光度数±1．00D的范围内。术后随访发现睫状肌麻痹下等值球镜屈光度数波动范围为＋0．99～＋0．67D。最佳戴镜矫正远、近视力均不丢失。术后2年平均最佳戴镜矫正远视力为0．40±0．28,平均最佳戴镜矫正近视力为0．78±0．39。经规范弱视治疗,双眼不等像、同时视、融合、立体视及隐斜均得以改善。结论对患有高度远视性屈光参差且不能耐受戴镜矫治的儿童,采用LASIK矫治屈光参差是安全、有效的,具有良好的可预测性和稳定性,且这一手术有助于提高高度远视屈光参差性弱视的治愈率。     

Artisan phakic intraocular lens implantation after retinal detachment surgery

PURPOSE: To report three cases of Artisan phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation to correct myopic refractive error after previous retinal detachment surgery treated with scleral encircling. METHODS: Artisan PIOLs were implanted in a 29-year-old man with -21.0 -2.0 x 180 manifest refraction and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) of 20/40 (case 1), a 28-year-old woman with BSCVA of 20/20 and -8.5 -1.0 x 180 manifest refraction (case 2), and a 44-year-old man with BSCVA of 20/32 and -11.75 -1.75 x 10 manifest refraction (case 3). RESULTS: In case 1, 24 months after implantation of the Artisan PIOL, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/40. In case 2, 24 months after surgery, UCVA was 20/32. In case 3, 3 months after surgery, UCVA was 20/32. There was no formation of new breaks, progressive vitreoretinal traction, or complications. CONCLUSIONS: The Artisan PIOL may provide an alternative method to correct high myopia after retinal detachment surgery.     

Phakic refractive lens: two-year results

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical outcome and adverse events associated with correction of myopia and hyperopia with a phakic refractive lens (PRL), and to determine the random errors of the analytical methods used in the trial. METHODS: In this prospective clinical study, 14 myopic and 6 hyperopic PRLs were implanted in 20 eyes of 20 patients from April to November 2002. Follow-up included evaluation of the PRL rotation with retroillumination photography, the distance between the PRL and crystalline lens with Scheimpflug images, laser flare meter, endothelial cell count, uncorrected (UCVA) and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), refraction, intraocular pressure, and induced cataract. The random errors of the measurements with laser flare meter were 17%, with Scheimpflug images 10%, and with endothelial cell count 2.8%. RESULTS: Postoperatively, 25% of eyes gained 2 or more lines and no eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. Mean UCVA was 0.89 +/- 0.34. Laser flare values returned to baseline at 3 months and had no changes at 1 or 2 years (P > .05). The PRL rotated less during the second year than the first year. The distance between the PRL and crystalline lens was less at 1 year than at baseline (P < .05) but had no change during the second year. No statistically significant endothelial cell loss was noted between 1 week and 1 or 2 years postoperatively (P > .05). Two (10%) eyes developed pupillary block, one (5%) hyperopic eye showed unexpected postoperative myopia, and in another hyperopic eye (5%) the horizontal iris transillumination defects were noticed at 1 year combined with slight pupil ovalization at 2 years. No induced cataract, glaucoma, or inflammation was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Safety and efficacy indexes were high at 2-year follow-up. The distance between the PRL and crystalline lens decreased by 59% during the first year but seemed to stabilize thereafter. The PRL rotated in only a few eyes after the first year.