Milligam-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy and stapled mucoprolapsectomy. Clinical comparison of the results

The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the results of treatment for hemorrhoids by Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy and by stapled mucoprolapsectomy in terms of operative time, postoperative pain, lenght of hospital stay, incidence of early and late complications, time to return to work and to normal social activities and patient satisfaction. Between January 2002 and December 2003, a total of 65 patients with hemorrhoids (35 men and 30 women with a mean age of 46.9 years) underwent surgical treatment: 41 patients underwent conventional hemorrhoidectomy and 24 patients stapled mucoprolapsectomy. All patients were contacted by phone or were reviewed in the outpatient clinic with a mean follow-up of 2 months (range 8-31). The Authors emphasize that it is difficult to make an objective comparison between hemorrhoidectomy and stapled mucoprolapsectomy because the two procedures are completely different in terms of rationale and technique; however, stapled circumferential mucosectomy in their experience causes less postoperative pain and bleeding and can be considered a valid therapeutic option for third- and fourth-degree disease.     

Randomized controlled trial to compare the early and mid-term results of stapled versus open hemorrhoidectomy

BACKGROUND: The new technique of circular stapler for the treatment of hemorrhoids has shown early promise in terms of minimal or no postoperative pain, early discharge from hospital, and quick return to work. This study was designed to compare stapled technique with the well-accepted conventional Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: After fulfilling the selection criteria, 84 patients were randomly allocated to the stapled (n = 42) or open group (n = 42). All patients were operated on under spinal anesthesia. The 2 techniques were evaluated with respect to the operative time, pain scores, complications, day of discharge, return to work, and level of satisfaction. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 46.02 years (SD, 12.33) in the stapled group and 48.64 years (14.57) in the open group. Grade III or IV hemorrhoids were more common in men (ie, 80.9% and 85.7% in the stapled and open group, respectively). The mean operative time was shorter in the stapled group 24.28 minutes (4.25) versus 45.21 minutes (5.36) in the Milligan-Morgan group (P < .001). The blood loss, pain scores and requirement of analgesics was significantly less in the stapled group. Mean hospital stay was 1.24 days (0.62) and 2.76 days (1.01) (P < .001) in the stapled and open group, respectively. The patients in the stapled group returned to work or routine activities earlier (ie, within 8.12 days [2.48]) as compared with 17.62 (5.59) in the open group. Only 88.1% of patients were satisfied by the open method compared with 97.6% after the stapled technique. The median follow-up period was 11 months with a maximum follow-up of 19 months (range 2-19 months). CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a safe and effective day-care procedure for the treatment of grade III and grade IV hemorrhoids. It ensures lesser postoperative pain, early discharge, less time off work, complications similar to the open technique, and in the end a more satisfied patient with no perianal wound. However, more such randomized trials are essential to deny any long-term complication.     

Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial

HYPOTHESIS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy offers several advantages over excision hemorrhoidectomy, including reduced postoperative pain, a reduced hospital stay, and an earlier recovery time. Furthermore, stapled hemorrhoidectomy is associated with lower hemorrhoidal recurrence on long-term follow-up. DESIGN: A randomized prospective trial. Patients were blinded to the operation technique used. Follow-up occurred at 1 and 3 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. SETTING: A university hospital providing primary, secondary, and tertiary care. PATIENTS: Forty patients with second- and third-degree hemorrhoid disease were randomized to undergo either stapled or excision hemorrhoidectomy. Two patients were excluded. All patients were subject to a follow-up examination. INTERVENTIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy (Longo technique) vs excision hemorrhoidectomy (Ferguson technique). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operating time, postoperative pain (measured by the visual analog scale), hospital stay, histologic features, morbidity, defecation habit, continence, recovery time (return to work), and hemorrhoid recurrence at 1 year. RESULTS: Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy was associated with a significantly reduced operating time (30 vs 43.25 minutes; P<.001), reduced postoperative pain scores (visual analog score) on the first 4 postoperative days (day 1: 2.7 vs 6.3; day 2: 1.7 vs 6.3; day 3: 0.8 vs 5.4; and day 4: 0.5 vs 4.8, where 0 indicates no pain, and 10, maximum pain; P < or = .001), and an earlier return to work (6.7 vs 20.7 days;P =.001). There were no differences for stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy in length of hospital stay (2.4 vs 2.1 days), complications (3 [15%] of 20 patients vs 5 [25%] of 20 patients), and recurrence rate (1 [5%] of 20 patients vs 1 [5%] of 20 patients). CONCLUSIONS: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is associated with reduced postoperative pain, earlier recovery time and return to work, and a similar recurrence rate compared with the excision technique. Provided further clinical trials confirm these findings, stapled hemorrhoidectomy may become a future gold standard.     

Early experience of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in a community hospital setting.

BACKGROUND: Stapled hemorrhoidectomy was introduced as a new procedure for the surgical management of hemorrhoidal disease in 1993. We present a cohort longitudinal study performed in a community hospital setting where the short-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidectomy were compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy. METHODS: We compared 41 consecutive patients who underwent a conventional open diathermy (Ferguson) hemorrhoidectomy between September 1999 and September 2001 with 40 consecutive patients who underwent a stapled hemorrhoidectomy procedure between September 2001 and June 2004. We analyzed perioperative and postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, patient satisfaction and case costing for both groups. RESULTS: The stapled hemorrhoidectomy group comprised 13 men and 27 women. The open hemorrhoidectomy group comprised 9 men and 32 women. There were no intraoperative complications in either group. In the stapled hemorrhoidectomy group, 3 patients presented with postoperative complications and 3 required admission. In the open hemorrhoidectomy group, 14 patients presented with postoperative complications and 11 required admission. At 2-week follow-up, 35 patients (88%) presented no complaints in the stapled hemorrhoidectomy group, versus 27 (66%) in the open hemorrhoidectomy group. The total cost calculated for the stapled hemorrhoidectomy procedure was dollar 716.38, whereas the total cost of the open hemorrhoidectomy procedure was dollar 760.00. CONCLUSIONS: The stapled hemorrhoidectomy technique is a safe alternative to the traditional open hemorrhoidectomy. It can be performed as an outpatient procedure, is well tolerated by patients and is no more expensive than conventional surgical therapy.     

Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy versus Conventional Excision Hemorrhoidectomy for Acute Hemorrhoidal Crisis

We compared the safety and clinical outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidectomy and conventional excision hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of acute hemorrhoidal crisis, and analyzed various factors associated with complications in stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Forty patients underwent stapled hemorrhoidectomy and forty underwent conventional excision hemorrhoidectomy. All had the operation under local anesthesia with conscious sedation within 24 h of admission. The length of surgery, hospital stay, disability, postoperative pain, and the use of analgesics were significantly less for patients in the stapled hemorrhoidectomy group. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy did not significantly increase the rate of complications. Five patients in the stapled group (12.5%) required further surgical intervention: three with thrombosed hemorrhoids and two with recurrent prolapse. No serious complications were reported in either group. Patient satisfaction was similar in the two groups. Increased age was identified as a factor that significantly elevated the risk of complications in the stapled group (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01–1.13). Anemia and time between the onset of prolapsed hemorrhoids and hospital admission were also risk factors for complications, although they were not significant. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a feasible treatment for selected patients with an acute hemorrhoidal crisis and has a similar complication rate to that of conventional excision hemorrhoidectomy. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy is superior in less-postoperative pain, shorter operation time, shorter hospital stay, and earlier return to normal activity. However, we suggest that older patients with anemia or a prolonged hemorrhoidal crisis are unsuitable for stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of The Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, Washington, DC, May 19–23, 2007 (poster presentation).     

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Two Different Circular Staplers for Mucosectomy in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids

Background The main objections against circular stapled mucosectomy have been anal pain and rectal bleeding during the surgical procedure or in the immediate postoperative follow-up. To avoid these consequences, a new stapler (PPH33-03) has been developed. The aim of this trial was to compare the intraoperative and short-term postoperative morbidity of stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-01 versus PPH33-03 in the treatment of hemorrhoids. Methods We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemorrhoidectomy with PPH33-01 (group 1, n = 30) versus PPH33-03 (group 2, n = 30) for grade III–IV symptomatic hemorrhoids. For the follow-up, the patients underwent examination and proctoscopy at 4 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. We recorded anal pain (linear analog scale from 0 to 10), intraoperative hemorrhage, postoperative bleeding, and continence (Wexner Continence Grading Scale). Results Demographic and clinical features showed no differences between the two groups. More patients required suture ligation to stop anastomotic bleeding at surgery when the PPH33-01 stapler was used (15 versus 4, P < 0.05). Rectal bleeding during the first postoperative 4 weeks was similar (P > 0.05). The postoperative pain scores during the first week were similar (P > 0.05). Patients with pain on defecation were fewer in the PPH-03 group (15 versus 2, P < 0.05). Six patients from group 1 and none from group 2 (P < 0.05) had granulomas along the line of staples at the sites of the reinforcing stitches; the granulomas were associated with postoperative anal discomfort and rectal bleeding. One patient in group 1 complained of persistent pain that resolved within 3 months. Of all the intraoperative or preoperative variables analyzed, only the presence of granuloma was associated with postoperative bleeding and anal discomfort. We have not found any recurrence or incontinence during the 6-month follow-up. Conclusions Intraoperative bleeding along the stapled line and tenesmus or discomfort during defecation were less frequent after circular stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-03. Therefore, circular stapled mucosectomy with PPH33-03 decreases the risk of immediate complications and thus allows implantation with more safety as a day surgery procedure.     

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a review of our early experience

Treatment of hemorrhoids may safely be accomplished by using a circular stapler instead of the conventional open procedure for large symptomatic hemorrhoids. Our purpose was to assess the safety and early post-op results of this new surgical technique as it was introduced into clinical practice. Medical records from 62 patients treated by circumferential mucosectomy/stapled hemorrhoidectomy were obtained from 6 surgeons. Preoperative factors assessed included demographics, comorbidities, prior anorectal surgery, hemorrhoid grade, and the indications for surgery. Operative factors examined included operating time, use of perioperative antibiotics, and oversewing of the suture line. Postoperative factors included complications and date of last follow-up. Sixty-two patients underwent this operation, and complications were reported in six patients (10%). There was one death unrelated to the hemorrhoid surgery. Postoperative pain, defined as requiring pain control with intravenous medication, hospital admission, or an emergency department visit, occurred in two patients. Two patients reported postoperative bleeding. One patient experienced bleeding the first evening, and the second patient had bleeding 1 week postoperatively. The first patient was admitted overnight and required no blood transfusion or further intervention. The second patient was subsequently found to have a bleeding diverticulum. One patient experienced urinary retention that resolved with conservative management. Postoperative follow-up was available for over 90 per cent of the patients at a median of 4 weeks postoperatively. No additional complications were discovered at follow-up. This data suggests that stapled hemorrhoidectomy is a safe and effective approach to hemorrhoidal disease. Our findings indicate an acceptable complication rate among a group of surgeons beginning to integrate this modality into clinical practice.     

Glyceryl Trinitrate Ointment Did Not Reduce Pain After Stapled Hemorrhoidectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Medications, including topical 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate (GTN), can reduce anal spasm and pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy. GTN after stapled hemorrhoidopexy was compared with routine postoperative management. Patients with symptomatic grade 3/4 hemorrhoids were recruited. After stapled hemorrhoidopexy, residual perianal skin tags were excised as appropriate. Those requiring double purse-string mucosectomy were excluded. Postoperative pain, pain duration, and complications were assessed. One hundred ten patients (74 men; mean age 50.6 years) were enrolled in the control group and 100 patients (57 men; mean age 49.8 years) in the GTN group. Maximum pain was higher in the GTN group (P  =  0.015). There were no differences between the two groups in residual perianal skin tags requiring excision, postoperative complications, recurrence rates, follow-up period, average pain, duration of pain, or satisfaction scores. Sixteen GTN patients were noncompliant due to side effects. None had persistent perianal skin tags. GTN did not reduce postoperative pain after stapled hemorrhoidectomy.     

Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy is a safe,effective outpatient alternative for the treatment of symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids in the elderly

Background: Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy (CMSP) was first introduced in 1993 as a less painful and highly effective alternative to traditional operative hemorrhoidectomy. Although CMSP has many advantages over traditional hemorrhoidectomy, some authorities and insurers continue to regard it as an inpatient procedure and others have been slow to adopt this progressive technique. This study documents the safe and effective outpatient nature of this procedure. Methods: From December 2001 through August 2002, 33 patients with mucosal prolapse and prolapsing internal hemorrhoids were treated using circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy as outpatients at an ambulatory surgery center. Fourteen (42%) patients were treated using local anesthesia with intravenous sedation, 18 (55%) chose spinal anesthesia, and general anesthesia was used in one patient. Patients were evaluated postoperatively by telephone at 1 and 2 weeks, and seen in clinic at 4 weeks. Results: One patient (3%) required an emergency department visit for minor postoperative bleeding. None of our elderly patients required emergency department evaluation and none reported significant complications. Four patients (13%) required urinary catheter placement prior to discharge from the surgery center due to urinary retention. One patient (3%) developed an uncomplicated urinary tract infection, which resolved with antibiotic treatment. Two patients were seen earlier than 4 weeks at the surgeons request; one was immunocompromised from chemotherapy for metastatic carcinoid, and one reported persistent pain during initial telephone follow-up. No complications were identified in either patient, and no additional complications have been noted to date. Conclusions: CMSP is a safe, effective, time-efficient procedure for patients with mucosal prolapse and prolapsing hemorrhoids that can be performed safely in the ambulatory surgery center setting. Age is not a limiting factor in selecting patients for this safe outpatient procedure.     

Submucosal hemorrhoidectomy with Parks technique: prospective study of 327 patients

Hemorrhoidectomy is the treatment of choice for Stage 3 and 4 hemorrhoids; the most popular technique is that described by Milligan et al. Longo has recently introduced stapled anopexy as an alternative to the Milligan hemorrhoidectomy, however long-term results do not yet demonstrate a convincing superiority. The Parks technique of hemorrhoidectomy is another alternative to Milligan's procedure; it is an established and widely known procedure. The present prospective trial reports the immediate and medium-term results of Parks hemorrhoidectomy performed on 327 consecutive patients between 1997 and 2001. All patients were interviewed using a standard questionnaire before surgery and at 1 and 3 weeks after surgery. An anal incontinence score was recorded before and after surgery in the first 198 patients. No serious operative complications were seen. The daily mean postoperative pain score was less than 3. Mean hospital stay was 2.2 days and work incapacity was 11 days. The anal incontinence score was unchanged or improved in 179 patients (90.4%) and was worsened in 19 patients (9.6%). This trial confirms that Parks hemorrhoidectomy is safe and leads to satisfactory outcome. Postoperative pain is reduced and anal functional sequelae are few.     

Sept ans d’hémorroïdopexies : des premiers essais contrôlés aux méta-analyses

Background

Surgical haemorrhoidectomy is reputed to be a painful procedure for a benign disorder. The circular transanal stapled technique for the treatment of haemorrhoids has the potential to offer a less painful rectal procedure in place of ablative perianal surgery. We compared the short-term outcome of the circular stapled procedure for haemorrhoids with current standard surgery in a randomised controlled trial.

Method

Fourty patients admitted for surgical treatment of prolapsing haemorrhoids were randomly assigned to either Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (n = 20) or the circular stapled procedure. Under general anaesthesia patients underwent standardised diathermy excision haemorrhoidectomy or had a circumferential doughnut of rectal mucosa and submucosa above the dentate line excised and closed with a standard circular end-to-end stapling device. All patients received standardised preoperative and postoperative analgesic and laxative regimens. Patients completed linear analogue pain charts each day and were interviewed at 1, 3, and 6–10 weeks postoperatively. Summary measures of average pain experience were calculated from 10 cm linear analogue pain scores and were used as the primary outcome measure.

Findings

The stapled group had shorter anaesthesia time (median 18 [range 9–25] vs 22 [15–35] minutes). Average pain in the stapled group was significantly lower than it was in the Milligan-Morgan group (2.1 [0.2–7.6] vs 6.5 [3.1–8.5], 95.1 % CI difference medians 1.9–4.7, p < 0.0001. Mann-Whitney U test). Average pain relative to what the patient expected was also significantly less in the stapled group (?2.8 [?4.4 to 1.3] vs 0.7 [?1.8 to 3.4]). Hospital stay and time to first bowel motion were not significantly different between groups. Return to normal activity was significantly shorter in the stapled group (17 [3–60] vs 34 [14–90]). Early and late complications, patient-assessed symptom control, and functional outcome appear similar after short-term follow-up.

Interpretation

The circular stapled technique offers a significantly less painful alternative to Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy and is associated with an earlier return to normal activity. Early symptom control and functional outcome appear similar. However, long-term symptomatic and functional outcome need further study.     

Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy

BACKGROUND: The introduction of a stapling technique for the treatment of haemorrhoids has the potential for less postoperative pain, a short operating time and an early return to full activity. The outcome of stapled haemorrhoidectomy was compared with that of current standard surgery in a randomized controlled study. METHODS: Two hundred patients were randomized to either stapled haemorrhoidectomy (n = 100) or Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy (n = 100) between March 1997 and December 1998. Each patient received standardized postoperative analgesic and laxative regimens, and completed a linear analogue pain score every 6 h during the first day after operation, after the first motion and daily until the end of the first week. Operating time, frequency of postoperative analgesic intake, hospital stay, time to return to normal activity and postoperative complications were also recorded. RESULTS: The mean(s.d.) age of patients in the stapled and surgical groups was 44.1(3.2) and 49.1(12.2) years respectively. The stapled group had a shorter operating time, less frequent postoperative analgesia intake, shorter hospital stay and earlier return to normal activity. Early and late complications, and functional outcome were better in the stapled group. CONCLUSION: Use of a circular stapler in the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease was safe, and was associated with fewer complications than conventional haemorrhoidectomy.     

Stapled and Open Hemorrhoidectomy: Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Results

Abstract The aim of the study was to compare the early results in 52 patients randomly allocated to undergo either stapled or open hemorrhoidectomy. Seventy-four patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids were randomly allocated to undergo either stapled (37 patients) or open (37 patients) hemorrhoidectomy. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy was performed with the use of a circular stapling device. Open hemorrhoidectomy was accomplished according to the Milligan-Morgan technique. Postoperative pain was assessed by means of a visual analogue scale (V.A.S.). Recovery evaluation included return to pain-free defecation and normal activities. A 6-month clinical follow-up and a 17.5 (10 to 27)-month median telephone follow-up was obtained in all patients. Operation time for stapled hemorrhoidectomy was shorter (median 25 [range 15 to 49] minutes versus 30 [range 20 to 44] minutes, p = 0.041). Median (range) V.A.S. scores in the stapled group were significantly lower (V.A.S. score after 4 hours: 4 [2 to 6] versus 5 [2 to 8], p = 0.001; V.A.S. score after 24 hours: 3 [1 to 6] versus 5 [3 to 7], p = 0.000; V.A.S. score after first defecation: 5 [3 to 8] versus 7 [3 to 9], p = 0.000). Resumption of pain-free defecation was significantly faster in the stapled group (10 [6 to 14] days vs 12 [9 to 19] days, p = 0.001). At follow-up 4 weeks and 6 months postoperatively the median (range) symptom severity score was similar in both groups (1 [0 to 2] versus 0 [0 to 3], p = 0.150 and 0 [0 to 2] versus 0 [0 to 2], p = 0.731). At long-term follow-up occasional pain was present in 6/37 (16.2) patients in the stapled group and 7/37 (18.9%) in the Milligan-Morgan group (p = 1.000); episodes of bleeding were reported by 8/37 (21.6%) patients in the stapled group and 5/37 (13.5%) patients in the Milligan-Morgan group (p = 0.542). No problems related to continence and defecation were reported in either group. Patients were satisfied with the operation in 33/37 (89.2%) cases in the stapled group and 31/37 (83.8%) cases in the Milligan-Morgan group (p = 0.735). Hemorrhoidectomy with a circular staple device is easy to perform and achieves better results than the Milligan-Morgan technique in terms of postoperative pain and recovery. Comparable results are obtained at long-term follow-up.     

Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles

Background The aim of the study was to compare the results in 95 patients randomly allocated to undergo either stapled or open hemorrhoidectomy using Ligasure.Methods Ninety-five patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids were randomly allocated to undergo either stapled (50 patients) or open using Ligasure (45 patients). Stapled hemorrhoidectomy was performed with the use of a circular stapling device. Open hemorrhoidectomy was accomplished according to the Milligan-Morgan technique by using Ligasure. Postoperative pain was assessed by means of a visual analog scale (VAS). Recovery evaluation included return to pain-free defecation and normal activities. A 6-month clinical follow-up and an 18 (12-24) month median telephone follow-up were obtained in all patients.Results Operation time for open hemorrhoidectomy using Ligasure was shorter [median 13 (range 9.2-16.1) min vs 15 (range 8-17) minutes, p < 0.05]. Median range of VAS score in the stapled group were significantly lower [VAS score after 8 h: 3 (2-6) vs 5 (3-8), p < 0.01; VAS score after first defecation: 5 (3-8) vs 7 (3-9), p < 0.001. The stapled hemorrhoidectomy was associated with an increased incidence of intraoperative bleeding in 18 cases (36%) vs four cases (8.8%) of the Ligasure group. There were three cases (6%) from the stapled group with recurrence of the hemorrhoids and none from the open technique.Conclusions Hemorrhoidectomy with a circular stapler device is easy to perform, but one more line of clips must be added to the device to avoid intraoperative bleeding from the cut line. Hemorrhoidectomy performed using Ligasure is more painful postoperatively but is a more radical operation.     

Radio-ablation of advanced grades of hemorrhoids with radiofrequency

BACKGROUND: For advanced degree of hemorrhoids with prolapse of the rectal mucosa, the choice is hemorrhoidectomy, which could be open, close, diathermy, Laser, or stapled one. As an effective alternative to this, in situ radio-frequency ablation of the pile mass has been found to be quite efficacious with many added advantages over the conventional hemorrhoidectomy procedures in practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study included 50 patients (34 males and 16 females) treated at Gupta Nursing Home, Laxminagar, Nagpur, India, with the above technique from April 2000 to March 2001 and each case followed up over a period of 12 months. RESULTS: In first 4 weeks of the procedure, 14% of patients complained of bleeding, whereas all of the patients had some amount of pain. Eleven (22%) patients had serosanguinous discharge, but in none of them was there any incontinence or prolapse. All of the patients resumed their routine within 1 week of the procedure. A subsequent follow-up of the patients at an interval of 12 weeks and 12 months showed significant relief in all of the above early postoperative symptoms. During follow-up at the end of 1 year, 7 patients were found to have skin tag formation. However, complications like anal stenosis or stricture or incontinence was not found in any of the patients. CONCLUSION: For advanced degree of piles with prolapse as the main symptom, in situ radio-frequency ablation can be a better choice to various types of hemorrhoidectomy in the sense that the hospital stay is minimized, recurrence is rare, and return to work is faster. The results are more assuring when compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy. The technique fits into the parameters for being called the gold standard procedure. Except the radio-frequency unit, the procedure needs no specialized instrument. It can be performed in any routine surgical setup.     

Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: critical observation on state of art

The authors review pros and cons of stapled hemorrhoidectomy (SH). Postoperative primary lower than after hemorrhoidectomy, but no data are available on the long term recurrences in large prospective series. Severe postoperative complications have been reported and SH seems less effective in patients with 4th degree files. SH is a useful technique, provided that proper indication are strictly followed and the procedure is carried out by specialists.     

吻合器痔上黏膜环切术的并发症及防治

目的:探讨吻合器痔上黏膜环切术并发症的产生原因及防治方法.方法:回顾性分析60例严重脱垂性痔病行吻合器痔上黏膜环切术患者,观察患者手术时间、住院时间、恢复正常工作天数、并发症.结果:平均手术时间:14 min(10～20min),平均住院天数:3d(2～5d),10d(7～17d)可恢复正常工作.早期并发症包括:尿潴留30例(50%),术后下腹坠痛14例(27.0%),严重疼痛6例(10%),1例血栓形成,吻合口附近肠壁内血肿1例.随访1个月至14个月,2例复发.60例患者均无大便失禁、肛门狭窄等发生.结论:PPH是治疗严重脱垂性痔的新的、安全的方法,近期疗效肯定,术后并发症少,但尚需多中心临床研究及长期随访证实.     

A new anoscope for transanal surgery

BACKGROUND: Although stapled mucosectomy has several advantages over hemorrhoidectomy for hemorrhoidal prolapse, complications such as hemorrhage, pain, and life-threatening pelvic sepsis may occur, often due to poorly executed purse-string suture. We describe a simple new anoscope that makes it easy to correctly perform and position the purse-string suture that is an integral part of stapled mucosectomy. METHODS: The apex of the middle part of the new anoscope consists of digitiform projections separated by spaces. After insertion of the instrument into the anus, the inner part is removed, allowing strips of rectal mucosa to protrude through the spaces between the digitiform projections. The purse-string suture is made through these protrusions. The suture catches the mucosa and submucosa but not the deeper muscle layer, which does not protrude through the spaces. CONCLUSION: Preliminary histologic studies in the pig suggest that the design of the anoscope prevents inclusion of the muscular layer in the pursestring.     

Documented Complications of Staple Hemorrhoidopexy: A Systematic Review

A systematic review addressing reported complications of stapled hemorrhoidopexy was conducted. Articles were identified via searching OVID and MEDLINE between July 2011 and October 2013. Limitations were placed on the search criteria with articles published from 1998 to 2013 being included in this review. No language restrictions were placed on the search, however foreign language articles were not translated. Two reviewers independently screened the abstracts for relevance and their suitability for inclusion. Data extraction was conducted by both reviewers and entered and analyzed in Microsoft Excel. The search identified 784 articles and 78 of these were suitable for inclusion in the review. A total of 14,232 patients underwent a stapled hemorrhoidopexy in this review. Overall complication rates of stapled hemorrhoidopexy ranged from 3.3%–81% with 5 mortalities documented. Early and late complications were defined individually with overall data suggesting that early complications ranged from 2.3%–58.9% and late complications ranged from 2.5%–80%. Complications unique to the procedure were identified and rates recorded. Both early and late complications unique to stapled hemorrhoidopexy were identified and assessed.Key words: Stapled anopexy, Stapled hemorrhoidectomy, Stapled hemorrhoidopexy, ComplicationsThe stapled hemorrhoidopexy was introduced in 1993 and has been used as an alternative method to the Ferguson and Milligan-Morgan technique for the surgical management of hemorrhoidal disease. The technique has received enthusiasm as it was claimed that it could be completed with speed, minimal postoperative pain and good postoperative outcomes, in comparison with the previously used methods. Despite this, however, long-term sequelae of the stapled hemorrhoidopexy have not been widely documented and recent evidence has led to suspicion surrounding the complication rates of the procedure and how these actually compare with other techniques of hemorrhoidectomy. This review addressed and provided a review in regard to the complication rates of the stapled hemorrhoidopexy and has allowed for collation of data surrounding the major complications reported, within the literature, associated with this technique. It has allowed for a long-term collation of the complications associated with the procedures that have not been readily available and reported on, in the previously conducted randomized control trials (RCTs).     

双半环直肠下端黏膜切除术治疗直肠前突(附15例临床分析)

目的:评价双半环直肠下端黏膜切除术治疗直肠前突的临床疗效及安全性.方法:采用两把PPH分别在直肠前、后壁齿线上3 cm处作半环,行直肠下端黏膜切除.结果:用双半环直肠下端黏膜切除术治疗15例直肠前突患者,均取得了良好的治疗效果.结论:双半环直肠下端黏膜切除术治疗直肠前突临床疗效显著,安全可靠.