Trauma in cirrhotics: survival and hospital sequelae in patients requiring abdominal exploration

Hepatic cirrhosis significantly increases the mortality and morbidity of elective surgery; therefore we hypothesized that cirrhosis would adversely impact outcome after abdominal trauma. We used the trauma registry to identify 17 patients with cirrhosis who sustained trauma injuries requiring emergent exploratory laparotomy. Patients were characterized with respect to age, sex, hospital days, intensive care unit days, and trauma scores. A control group (n = 73) was constructed from the registry by matching age, sex, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and Abbreviated Injury score. Mortality rates were compared by Fisher's exact test and age, ISS, Revised Trauma Score 2, and hospital and intensive care unit days were compared by Student's t test. Despite similar ISS between cirrhotic patients and controls, patients with cirrhosis had a fourfold increase in mortality (mortality odds ratio = 7.2; 95% confidence interval = 2.2-24.0). Cirrhotic trauma patients had a complication rate of 71 per cent and a mortality of 44 per cent. We conclude that cirrhosis is a major independent risk factor for mortality in trauma patients with injuries that require emergent abdominal surgery.     

Evaluation of criteria for temporary external fixation in risk-adapted damage control orthopedic surgery of femur shaft fractures in multiple trauma patients: "evidence-based medicine" versus "reality" in the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society

BACKGROUND: Femur-shaft fracture treatment (FSFT) follows controversial management concepts after multiple trauma: primary-definitive osteosynthesis, secondary-definitive osteosynthesis after temporary external fixation (EF) in all patients, or individualized primary- or secondary-definitive osteosynthesis ("risk-adapted damage control orthopedics"). This study compares the concepts by analyzing literature evidence and a prospective multicenter database. METHODS: A systematic literature analysis was performed. The German Trauma Society trauma registry was used to assess variables predictive of treatment concept. RESULTS: Contradictory results in 63 controlled trials failed to support a "generalized management strategy." In all, 1,465 FSFTs in 8,057 trauma registry patients (age 39 +/- 19.5 years; Injury Severity Score [ISS] 23.5 +/- 14.9; 17.3% mortality) were treated initially (<24 hour) by EF, nail, or plate in 47.0%, 41.1%, and 11.9%, respectively. Despite large interhospital variability, EF was more likely with increasing severity of ISS, Glasgow Coma Score, thorax trauma, base excess, coagulation abnormalities, and initial probability of death. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical "reality" reflects the controversies of "scientific evidence" for FSFT after multiple trauma in Germany. Although decision making is currently based on unvalidated criteria, anatomic and physiologic injury severity appears to influence the choice of management concept.     

Which AIS based scoring system is the best predictor of outcome in orthopaedic blunt trauma patients?

BACKGROUND: Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS)-based systems-the Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Score (NISS), and AISmax-are used to assess trauma patients. The merits of each in predicting outcome are controversial. METHODS: A large prospective database was used to assess their predictive capacity using receiver operator characteristic curves. RESULTS: In all, 10,062 adult, blunt-trauma patients met the inclusion criteria. All systems were significant outcome predictors for sepsis, multiple organ failure (MOF), length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality (p < 0.0001). NISS was a significantly better predictor than the ISS for mortality (p < 0.0001). NISS was equivalent to the AISmax for mortality prediction and superior in patients with orthopaedic injuries. NISS was significantly better for sepsis, MOF, ICU stay, and total hospital stay (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: NISS is superior or equivalent to the ISS and AISmax for prediction of all investigated outcomes in a population of blunt trauma patients. As NISS is easier to calculate, its use is recommended to stratify patients for clinical and research purposes.     

Admission hyperglycemia as a prognostic indicator in trauma

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the utility of two levels of hyperglycemia as predictors for mortality and infectious morbidity in traumatically injured patients. METHODS: All patients >or= 17 years old presenting to a Level I trauma center as a "trauma alert" or a "trauma code" from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2000, were reviewed. Hypoglycemic patients (glucose concentration < 70 mg/dL) were excluded (n = 4). Patients were considered hyperglycemic with an admission glucose concentration > 200 mg/dL (moderate hyperglycemia) or an admission glucose concentration in the upper quartile for the group (mild hyperglycemia [glucose concentration > 135 mg/dL]). RESULTS: Seven hundred thirty-eight patients were included in the study. Hyperglycemia was associated with increased mortality among both patients with moderate hyperglycemia (34.1% vs. 3.7%, p < 0.01) and those with mild hyperglycemia (15.5% vs. 2%, p < 0.01) compared with corresponding normoglycemic groups. Hyperglycemia proved to be an independent predictor of mortality and of hospital and intensive care unit length of stay after multiple logistic regression while controlling for age, Injury Severity Score, Revised Trauma Score, and gender. Infectious complications, including pneumonia (9.4% vs. 2%, p = 0.001), urinary tract infections (6.6% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.001), wound infections (4.9% vs. 0.6%, p = 0.039), and bacteremia (5% vs. 1.1%, p = 0.004), were significantly increased in patients with elevated glucose concentrations. Hyperglycemia is an independent predictor of increased infectious morbidity controlling for age, gender, and Injury Severity Score in multiple logistic regression models. CONCLUSION: Hyperglycemia independently predicts increased intensive care unit and hospital length of stay and mortality in the trauma population. It is associated with increased infectious morbidity. These associations hold true for mild hyperglycemia (glucose concentration > 135 mg/dL) and moderate hyperglycemia (glucose concentration > 200 mg/dL).     

REVIEW OF LIVER TRAUMA MANAGEMENT IN TASMANIA: AN ANALYSIS OF RISK FACTORS FOR MORTALITY AND MORBIDITY

A review of liver trauma treated by the major trauma care facilities of Tasmania in the 5 year period between 1989 and 1993 is presented. The aim of this retrospective review was to provide an audit of the management of liver trauma in the island of Tasmania and to analyse the risk factors contributing to mortality and major morbidity. Thirty-seven patients were treated with a median Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 14 (range 9–34). The overall mortality rate of this series was 5.8%. Age, mechanism of injury (blunt or penetrating), delay prior to hospital presentation and modality of treatment (operative or non-operative) were not significant risk factors for mortality and morbidity; however, transfusion requirement of over 10 units of blood (P < 0.005), ISS score of over 20 (P < 0.005). haemodynamic instability at presentation (P < 0.05) and a Hepatic Injury Score (HIS) grade of 3 or more (P < 0.05) were statistically significant risk factors.     

Zeitintervalle während und nach Schockraumversorgung

Background

The prognosis of severely injured patients depends on a rapid diagnosis and early initiation of therapeutic procedures.

Material and methods

To that end a total of 6,927 prospectively documented severely injured patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥16 from the Trauma Registry of the German Trauma Society (DGU, 2002–2007) were analyzed with respect to time intervals during emergency trauma treatment.

Results

In cases of indicated emergency surgery the average ±time in the emergency department was 42±34 min, in cases of early surgery 75±41 min and in cases of transfer to the intensive care unit (ICU) 83±43 min, respectively. The time from the last diagnostic procedure until the end of emergency treatment was 12 min (emergency surgery), 26 min (early surgery) and 32 min (ICU), respectively. Level I (78 min) and level II (72 min) trauma centres showed similar mean times in the emergency department while level III trauma centres had a mean time of 86 min. According to this analysis no general correlation between shorter duration of emergency trauma care and reduced mortality could be observed.

Conclusion

The duration of time intervals depends on injury severity, treatment after completion of emergency trauma care and the level of the trauma centre. Time management in emergency trauma care can potentially be optimized after completion of the last diagnostic procedure in the emergency room.     

Predictive factors of operative or nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma

AIM: Nonoperative management (NOM) has revolutionized the care of blunt hepatic trauma patients. The aim of the present study was to identify and evaluate the predictors of NOM of these patients. METHODS: The Trauma Registry data of 55 consecutive adult patients admitted with blunt hepatic trauma over a 4-year period was reviewed. Patients were divided into immediately operated (OP-group) and selected for NOM (NOM-group). Factors analyzed were: demographics, injury mechanism, initial vital signs, liver injury grade, concomitant injuries, and total injury severity scoring systems. RESULTS: Concomitant abdominal trauma, high Injury Severity Score (ISS), low International Classification of Diseases 9(th) revision Injury Severity Score (ICISS), and low probability of survival (Ps) were predictors for operative management. Compared to NOM-patients (66%, N=36), OP-patients (34%, N=19) suffered more frequently concomitant abdominal injuries (84.2% vs 47.2%, P=0.004) and were more severely totally injured as expressed by higher ISS (25 vs 20, P=0.01), lower ICISS (0.51 vs 0.74, P=0.003), and lower Ps (0.81 vs 0.98, P=0.005). NOM resulted in lower intensive care unit admission and mortality rates (47.2% vs 78.9%, P=0.002 and 2.7% vs 15.8%, P=0.03, respectively). NOM-success rate was 92%. CONCLUSION: NOM of blunt hepatic trauma is safe and efficient. Concomitant abdominal trauma, ISS, ICISS, and Ps are predictors for operative or nonoperative management.     

Traumatic diaphragmatic injury: experience from a tertiary emergency medical center

Objective

We investigated our 12-year experience of traumatic diaphragmatic injury (TDI) in our emergency medical center. This study aimed to clarify clinical features of TDI and identify factors affecting mortality and morbidity in TDI treatment.

Methods

We analyzed clinical characteristics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), probability of survival (Ps), and mortality of patients treated for TDI at the Tertiary Emergency Medical Center of Tokyo Metropolitan Bokutoh Hospital between January 1999 and December 2010.

Results

TDI occurred in 28 patients. Of 21 TDI patients (75?%) who underwent surgery, 2 died (operative mortality, 9.5?%). Seven (25?%) presented with cardiopulmonary arrest, and TDI was detected during thoracotomy in the emergency room; all of these patients died. Blunt TDI occurred in 12 patients; penetrating TDI in 16. Blunt trauma patients had significantly more injured organs (3.75?±?0.28, P?=?0.043), higher ISS (P?=?0.024), and lower Ps (P?=?0.048). Lengths of intensive care unit (ICU) stay and hospital stay were greater in blunt cases than in penetrating cases (P?=?0.004 and P?=?0.02, respectively). Non-survivors had significantly higher ISS (P?<?0.001), lower Ps (P?=?0.0025), and larger injured diaphragm size (8.44?±?1.97, P?=?0.048). In blunt cases, delays in diagnosis and repair of TDI led to significantly increased ICU stay (16.25?±?3.64, P?=?0.017).

Conclusion

TDI occurs in cases of multiple trauma. Higher ISS and lower Ps predict death; therefore, prompt diagnosis of TDI and immediate repair of diaphragmatic injury are important.     

Prevalence of chest trauma, associated injuries and mortality: a level I trauma centre experience

A review of prospectively collected data in our trauma unit for the years 1998–2003 was undertaken. Adult patients who suffered multiple trauma with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of ≥16, admitted to hospital for more than 72 hours and with sustained blunt chest injuries were included in the study. Demographic details including pre-hospital care, trauma history, admission vital signs, blood transfusions, details of injuries and their abbreviated injury scores (AIS), operations, length of intensive care unit and hospital stays, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and mortality were analysed. Fulfilling the inclusion criteria with at least one chest injury were 1,164 patients. The overall mortality reached 18.7%. As expected, patients in the higher AIS groups had both a higher overall ISS and mortality rate with one significant exception; patients with minor chest injuries (AIS_chest = 1) were associated with mortality comparable to injuries involving an AIS_chest = 3. Additionally, the vast majority of polytraumatised patients with an AIS_chest = 1 died in ICU sooner than patients of groups 2–5.     

Is a full team required for emergency management of pediatric trauma?

Pediatric trauma centers often do not meet the guidelines requiring a trauma team as recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). We reviewed our experience with a team consisting of a pediatric emergency physician, resident, nurse, and respiratory therapist. The surgical and pediatric critical care residents and staff were available within 5 minutes. We conducted a retrospective chart review of 146 patients (aged 8.1 +/- 4.8 years) between 1987 and 1989, with Injury Severity Scores (ISS) greater than or equal to 16 or admitted to the pediatric critical care unit. The time of presentation, surgical services consulted, and the nature of the injury were obtained from chart review. The Pediatric Trauma Score (PTS), the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), the Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) were used to determine the severity of insult and physiologic derangement on admission. The Modified Injury Severity Score (MISS) was determined and the Delta score for Disability Assessment was assigned at discharge. The Delta score was also determined at 3-month intervals up to one year. The probability of survival (Ps) was calculated, using the ISS and RTS. The Z statistic for this group of patients was then determined, using the Major Trauma Outcome Study (MTOS) methodology. The percentages of patients who were normal, disabled, and dead were 61%, 31.5%, and 7.5%, respectively, at 6 months follow-up. Eleven deaths were expected based on PRISM and TRISS analysis. Our mortality and morbidity figures were comparable with those of centers with teams based on AAP guidelines.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Appraisal of early evaluation of blunt chest trauma: development of a standardized scoring system for initial clinical decision making

BACKGROUND: Current techniques for assessment of chest trauma rely on clinical diagnoses or scoring systems. However, there is no generally accepted standard for early judgement of the severity of these injuries, especially in regards to related complications. This drawback may have a significant impact on the management of skeletal injuries, which are frequently associated with chest trauma. However, no convincing conclusions can be determined until standardization of the degrees of chest trauma is achieved. We investigated the role of early clinical and radiologic assessment techniques on outcome in patients with blunt multiple trauma and thoracic injuries and developed a new scoring system for early evaluation of chest trauma. METHODS: A retrospective investigation was performed on the basis of 4,571 blunt polytrauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > or = 18) patients admitted to our unit. Inclusion criteria were treatment of thoracic injury that required intensive care therapy, initial Glasgow Coma Scale score greater than 8 points, and no local or systemic infection. Patients with thoracic trauma and multiple associated injuries (ISS > or = 18) were included. In all patients, the association between various parameters of the thoracic injuries and subsequent mortality and morbidity was investigated. RESULTS: A total of 1,495 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Patients' medical records and chest radiographs were reevaluated between May 1, 1998, and June 1, 1999. The association between rib fractures and chest-related death was low (> three ribs unilateral, mortality 17.3%, odds ratio 1.01) unless bilateral involvement was present (> three ribs bilateral, mortality 40.9%, odds ratio 3.43). Injuries to the lung parenchyma, as determined by plain radiography, were associated with chest-related death, especially if the injuries were bilateral or associated with hemopneumothorax (lung contusion unilateral, mortality 25.2%, odds ratio 1.82; lung contusion bilateral + hemopneumothorax, mortality 53.3%, odds ratio 5.1). When plain anteroposterior chest radiographs were used, the diagnostic rate of rib fractures (< or = three ribs) increased slightly, from 77.1% to 97.3% during the first 24 hours of admission. In contrast, pulmonary contusions were often not diagnosed until 24 hours after admission (47.3% at admission, 92.4% at 24 h, p = 0.002). A new composite scoring system (thoracic trauma severity score) was developed that combines several variables: injuries to the chest wall, intrathoracic lesions, injuries involving the pleura, admission PaO2/FIO2 ratio, and patient age. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated an adequate discrimination, as demonstrated by a value of 0.924 for the development set and 0.916 for the validation set. The score was also superior to the ISS (0.881) or the thorax Abbreviated Injury Score (0.693). CONCLUSION: Radiographically determined injuries to the lung parenchyma have a closer association with adverse outcome than chest-wall injuries but are often not diagnosed until 24 hours after injury. Therefore, clinical decision making, such as about the choice of surgery for long bone fractures, may be flawed if this information is used alone. A new thoracic trauma severity score may serve as an additional tool to improve the accuracy of the prediction of thoracic trauma-related complications.     

Emergency medical services (EMS) vs non-EMS transport of critically injured patients: a prospective evaluation

BACKGROUND: A previous report of 5,782 trauma patients demonstrated higher mortality among those transported by emergency medical services (EMS) than among their non-EMS-transported counterparts. HYPOTHESIS: Trauma patients who are transported by EMS and those who are not differ in the injury-to-hospital arrival time interval. DESIGN: Prospective cohort-matched observation study. SETTING: Level I trauma center, multidisciplinary study group. PATIENTS: All non-EMS patients were matched with the next appropriate EMS patient by an investigator who was unaware of the outcome and mode of transport. Every 10th EMS patient with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 13 or greater was also randomly enrolled. Matching characteristics included age, ISS, mechanism of injury, head Abbreviated Injury Score, and presence of hypotension. An interview protocol was developed to determine the time of injury. Interview responses from patients, witnesses, and friends were combined with data obtained from police, sheriff, and medical examiner reports. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to the hospital, mortality, morbidity, and length of stay. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients were enrolled (38 non-EMS, 38 EMS matched, 27 random EMS). Injury time was estimated using all available data made on 100 patients (97%). Independent raters agreed in 81% of cases. Deaths, complications, and length of hospital stay were similar between the EMS- and non-EMS-transported groups. Although time intervals were similar among the groups overall, more critically injured non-EMS patients (ISS > or = 13) got themselves to the trauma center in less time than their EMS counterparts (15 minutes vs 28 minutes; P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach can be utilized, and an interview protocol created to determine actual time of injury. Critically injured non-EMS-transported patients (ISS > or =13) arrived at the hospital earlier after their injuries.     

The prognostic significance of thoracic and abdominal trauma in severe trauma patients (Injury severity score > 15)

The aim of the present study was to assess the prognostic significance of thoracic and abdominal trauma in severely injured patients. A retrospective analysis was performed based on data from the period from March 1 2006 to December 31 2007, taken from the Trauma Registry of the University Hospital "SantAndrea" in Rome. A total of 844 trauma patients were entered in a database created for this purpose, and only patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15, (163 patients, 19.3%), were selected for the present study. These patients were divided into 2 groups: Group A (103 patients, 63.2%), consisting of patients with at least one thoracic injury, and Group B (46 patients, 28.2%) consisting of patients with concomitant thoracic and abdominal injuries. The impact of thoracic and abdominal trauma was studied by analyzing mortality and morbidity, in relation to patient age, cause and dynamics of trauma, length of hospital stay, and both ISS and New ISS (NISS). In a vast majority of cases, the cause of trauma was a road accident (126 patients, 77.3%). The mean age of patients with ISS > 15 was 45.2 +/- 19.3 years. The mean ISS and NISS were 25.7 +/- 10.5 and of 31.4 +/- 13.1 respectively. The overall morbidity and mortality rates were 18.4% (30 patients) and 28.8% (47 patients) respectively. In Group A the mortality rate was 23.3% (24 patients) and the morbidity rate was 33.9% (35 patients). In Group B mortality and morbidity rates were 369% (17 patients) and 43.5% (20 patients) respectively. It was shown that the presence of both thoracic and abdominal injuries significantly increases the risk of mortality and morbidity. In patients with predominantly thoracic injuries, NISS proved to be the more reliable score, while ISS appeared to be more accurate in evaluating patients with injuries affecting more than one region of the body.     

Analysis of chest injuries sustained during the 1999 Marmara earthquake

Purpose: The chest injury pattern after a major earthquake is not well understood because data on the type of trauma and surgical intervention are limited. This study was conducted to analyze patients who sustained chest injury during the Marmara earthquake that struck Turkey on August 17, 1999 registering 7.4 on the Richter scale. Methods: The medical reports of 528 patients transported to a military hospital in the first 48 h after the earthquake were reviewed. Two chest surgeons examined these 528 patients, 19 of whom (4%) had suffered a major chest injury. We retrospectively evaluated the injury pattern, Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS), and Injury Severity Score (ISS) in these 19 patients. Results: Eight patients (42%) had isolated chest injuries and 11 (58%) had suffered injury to more than one organ system, including chest trauma. The mean AIS and ISS were assigned as 2.9 (SD: 1) and 22 (SD: 7), respectively. Three (16%) of the 19 patients died, all of whom had suffered multiple injuries. The mean ISS of these three patients was 28.7 (range 25–34). Chest injury after a major earthquake was associated with an overall mortality rate of 16%, but chest injury with multiple injuries and an ISS over 25 was associated with a mortality rate of 60%. All patients with isolated chest injuries survived. Conclusion: Coexistent trauma with chest injury and an ISS over 25 were defined as poor prognostic factors for patients rescued after a major earthquake. Received: April 16, 2001 / Accepted: March 5, 2002     

An appraisal of trauma in the elderly

To review the trends of trauma in the elderly experienced at our trauma center compared with other Level I trauma centers. This was a retrospective trauma registry analysis (1996-2003) of 2783 blunt trauma in elderly (BTE) and 4568 adult (BTA) patients in a Level 1 trauma center. Falls and motor vehicular crashes were the most common mechanisms noted in 47 per cent and 31 per cent (84% and 13% in BTE, 25% and 42% in BTA). BTE were sicker, with higher Injury Severity Scores (ISS), lengths of stay, and mortality (5% vs 2%, P value < 0.05). ISS was 5.2-fold higher in nonsurvivors to survivors in BTA and 2.4-fold in BTE. Elevation in ISS resulted in higher linear increase in mortality in BTE (vs BTA) at any ISS level. Mortality in patients with ISS > or = 25 was 43.5 per cent vs 23.8 per cent. ISS > or = 50 had 31 per cent adult survivors but no elderly survivors. Among isolated injuries, head trauma in the elderly carried the highest mortality, at 12 per cent (19% in patients with an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3). Abdominal injuries were the most lethal (18.3% and 41.2% in patients with an Abbreviated Injury Score > or = 3) in multiple trauma victims (41% vs 18% in isolated trauma). There was 4.4-fold increased mortality in the presence of thoracic trauma. Combined head, chest, and abdominal trauma carried the worst prognosis. Thirty-four per cent of BTE and 88 per cent of BTA patients were discharged home. Elderly patients need more aggressive therapy, as they are sicker with higher mortality.     

Injured patients have lower mortality when treated by "full-time" trauma surgeons vs. surgeons who cover trauma "part-time"

BACKGROUND: Studies examining the effect of trauma surgeon volume on patient outcomes have had disparate results. We hypothesize that "full-time" trauma surgeons would have lower patient mortality rates than surgeons covering trauma "part-time." METHODS: Retrospective review of 14,171 patients during a span of 6.5 years (January 1998 to June 2004) from the trauma registry at an urban, university-based Level I trauma center. "Full-time" surgeons practiced primarily trauma, emergency surgery, and critical care. "Part-time" surgeons took trauma call, but mainly practiced another type of surgery (e.g., pancreatic, hepatobiliary, vascular, transplant). Chi square and multiple logistic regression compared mortality between groups. RESULTS: There were no differences in patient demographics or admission injury patterns between the two groups. On bivariate analysis, the subgroup of patients with severe head injury had lower mortality when treated by "full-time" surgeons. With ED deaths excluded, more severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] >15) had a survival benefit in the "full-time" group. Multiple logistic regression showed a 50% increase in mortality for patients treated by "part-time" trauma surgeons when adjusting for age, sex, ISS >15, severe head injury, hypotension, nighttime admission, day of the week, and penetrating mechanism (odds ratio of death 1.45, 95% CI 1.04-2.02). Similar results are seen in only patients surviving to emergency room discharge (odds ratio of death 1.50, 95% CI 1.01-2.22). Z and W scores showed higher than expected survival for all patients with the "full-time" cohort showing a larger benefit. CONCLUSIONS: Even within an established trauma program treating many injured patients, mortality is significantly lower in patients initially treated by "full-time" trauma surgeons.     

The impact of multiple casualty incidents on clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND: Multiple casualty incidents (MCI) highlight discrepancies between patient needs and available resources. It is generally thought that heavy patient loads adversely affect trauma health care delivery. The purpose of this study was to identify the impact of multiple casualty situations on the clinical outcomes of injured patients. METHODS: All severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > or = 12) who presented during a 12-month period to a regional trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. MCIs were defined as treating and admitting three or more trauma patients within a maximum of 3 hours. This cohort was compared with all other patients who did not meet MCI criteria. RESULTS: Ten percent (88/861) of all trauma patients were treated in an MCI setting. Groups did not vary among sex, age, ISS, or mechanism of injury (p > 0.05). MCI patients displayed a greater length of hospital stay, time to first surgical procedure, time to emergency laparotomy, and time spent in the emergency room (p < 0.05). MCI and non-MCI patients did not differ in ICU length of stay, postadmission morbidity, or mortality (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: The impact of a MCI on the quality of trauma care has not been previously defined. MCI events delay definitive care and prolong a patient's length of stay. This is particularly concerning in the emergency department where a trauma center's ability to treat MCI patients effectively via an increased surge capacity relies on swift patient triage and flow. We are now investigating these issues in other trauma centers.     

Mortality in Severely Injured Elderly Trauma Patients—When Does Age Become a Risk Factor?

Age is a well-known risk factor in trauma patients. The aim of the present study was to define the age-dependent cut-off for increasing mortality in multiple injured patients. Pre-existing medical conditions in older age and impaired age-dependent physiologic reserve contributing to a worse outcome in multiple injured elderly patients are discussed as reasons for increased mortality. A retrospective clinical study of a statewide trauma data set from 1993 through 2000 included 5375 patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > or = 16 who were stratified by age. The ISS and Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) quantified the injury severity. Outcome measures were mortality, shock, multiple organ failure, and severe head injury. Mortality in this series increased beginning at age 56 years, and that increase was independent of the ISS. The mortality rate increased from 7.3% (patients 46-55 years of age) to 13.0% (patients ages 56-65 years) in patients with ISS 16-24; from 23.8% to 32.1% in those with ISS 25-50; and from 62.2% to 82.1% in those with ISS 51-75 (P < or = 0.05). Severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) was the most frequent cause of death, with a significant peak in patients older than 75 years. The incidence of lethal multiple organ failure increased significantly beginning at age 56 years (P < or = 0.05), but it showed no further increase in patients aged 76 years or older. In contrast, the incidence of lethal shock showed a significant increase from age 76 years (P < or = 0.05), but not at age 56 years. However, from age 56 years, mortality increased significantly in patients who sustained multiple trauma-an increase that was independent of trauma severity.     

Prediction of outcomes in trauma: anatomic or physiologic parameters?

BACKGROUND: Prediction of outcomes after injury has traditionally incorporated measures of injury severity, but recent studies suggest that including physiologic and shock measures can improve accuracy of anatomic-based models. A recent single-institution study described a mortality predictive equation [f(x) = 3.48 - .22 (GCS) - .08 (BE) + .08 (Tx) + .05 (ISS) + .04 (Age)], where GSC is Glasgow Coma Score, BE is base excess, Tx is transfusion requirement, and ISS is Injury Severity Score, which had 63% sensitivity, 94% specificity, (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] 0.96), but did not provide comparative data for other models. We have previously documented that the Physiologic Trauma Score, including only physiologic variables (systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Glasgow Coma Score, age) also accurately predicts mortality in trauma. The objective of this study was to compare the predictive abilities of these statistical models in trauma outcomes. METHODS: Area under the ROC curve of sensitivity versus 1-specificity was used to assess predictive ability and measured discrimination of the models. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 15,534 trauma patients (80% blunt mechanism) admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 3-year period (mean age 37 +/- 18 years; mean Injury Severity Score 10 +/- 10; mortality 4%). Sensitivity of the new predictive model was 45%, specificity was 96%, ROC was 0.91, validating this new trauma outcomes model in our institution. This was comparable with area under the ROC for Revised Trauma Score (ROC 0.88), Trauma and Injury Severity Score (ROC 0.97), and Physiologic Trauma Score (ROC 0.95), but superior compared with admission Glasgow Coma Score (ROC 0.79), Injury Severity Score (ROC 0.79), and age (ROC 0.60). CONCLUSIONS: The predictive ability of this new model is superior to anatomic-based models such as Injury Severity Score, but comparable with other physiologic-based models such as Revised Trauma Score, Physiologic Trauma Score and Trauma, and Injury Severity Score.     

The New Injury Severity Score and the evaluation of pediatric trauma.

BACKGROUND: To compare the effectiveness of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) in predicting mortality in pediatric trauma patients. METHODS: NISS, the sum of the squares of a patient's three highest Abbreviated Injury Scale scores (regardless of body region), were calculated for 9,151 patients treated at four regional pediatric trauma centers and compared with previously calculated ISS values. The power of the two scoring systems to predict mortality was gauged through comparison of misclassification rates, receiver operating characteristic curves, and Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistics. RESULTS: Although there were significant differences in mean NISS and ISS values for each hospital, differences in the predictive abilities of the two scoring systems were insignificant, even when analysis was restricted to the subgroup of patients with severe or penetrating injuries. CONCLUSION: The significant differences in the predictive abilities of the ISS and NISS reported in studies of adult trauma patients were not seen in this review of pediatric trauma patients.