Should the Schwartz formula for estimation of GFR be replaced by cystatin C formula?

It is common practice to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the Schwartz formula (a height creatinine/ratio), although it has its limitations. Cystatin C was found to be a superior marker of GFR. No formula has been validated to estimate GFR from cystatin C in children. Children (aged 1.0–18 years, n=536) with various renal pathologies undergoing nuclear medicine GFR clearance studies (^99mTc-DTPA single-injection technique) were tested. Cystatin C was measured with a nephelometric assay. The Schwartz GFR was calculated using enzymatically determined serum creatinine in micromoles per liter using the constant 48 for adolescent males and 38 otherwise. Using multiple stepwise regression analysis on log/log-transformed data, we derived the following relationship between the cystatin C concentration and GFR: log(GFR)=1.962+[1.123*log(1/Cystatin C)]. Using the Bland and Altman analysis to test agreement between the Schwartz formula and gold standard GFR showed considerable bias, with a mean difference of +10.8% and a trend towards overestimation of the GFR by the Schwartz formula with lower GFRs. In contrast, the Bland and Altman analysis applied on the GFR estimate derived from cystatin C showed the mean difference to be negligible at +0.3% and no trend towards overestimation of the GFR with lower GFRs. In the regression analysis of the estimate and the GFR, the Schwartz estimate showed significant deviation from linearity, whereas the cystatin C estimate did not. In conclusion, the data suggest that this novel cystatin C-based GFR estimate shows significantly less bias and serves as a better estimate for GFR in children.This study was supported by a research grant from Dade Behring GmbH, Germany. There is no conflict of interest.     

Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates from serum creatinine has not been generalizable across all populations. Cystatin C has been proposed as an alternative marker for estimating GFR. The objective of this study was to compare cystatin C with serum creatinine for estimating GFR among different clinical presentations. Cystatin C and serum creatinine levels were obtained from adult patients (n=460) during an evaluation that included a GFR measurement by iothalamate clearance. Medical records were abstracted for clinical presentation (healthy, native chronic kidney disease or transplant recipient) at the time of GFR measurement. GFR was modeled using the following variables: cystatin C (or serum creatinine), age, gender and clinical presentation. The relationship between cystatin C and GFR differed across clinical presentations. At the same cystatin C level, GFR was 19% higher in transplant recipients than in patients with native kidney disease (P<0.001). The association between cystatin C and GFR was stronger among native kidney disease patients than in healthy persons (P<0.001 for statistical interaction). Thus, a cystatin C equation was derived using only patients with native kidney disease (n=204). The correlation with GFR (r(2)=0.853) was slightly higher than a serum creatinine equation using the same sample (r(2)=0.827), the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (r(2)=0.825) or the Cockcroft-Gault equation (r(2)=0.796). Averaged estimates between cystatin C and serum creatinine equations further improved correlation (r(2)=0.891). Cystatin C should not be interpreted as purely a marker of GFR. Other factors, possibly inflammation or immunosuppression therapy, affect cystatin C levels. While recognizing this limitation, cystatin C may improve GFR estimates in chronic kidney disease patients.     

The Cockcroft-Gault formula should not be used in children

BACKGROUND: Although designed for adults, the Cockcroft-Gault formula was recently proposed for use in children > or =13 years of age. METHODS: We compared the feasibility of the Cockcroft-Gault formula against the standard pediatric Schwartz formula and a novel cystatin C-based formula. Our patient cohort included 262 children aged 1 to 18 years with various renal pathologies, who underwent a 99-technetium diethylenetriaminepentaacetate ((99)Tc DTPA) glomerular filtration rate (GFR) renal scan. Calculations were performed in Systeme International (SI) units using published constants and recalculated constants from our patient population. Agreement was assessed using Bland and Altman analysis. RESULTS: Published and recalculated constants for the Cockcroft-Gault formula were 1.23 and 0.96, respectively, for boys, and 1.05 and 0.90, respectively, for girls. The published and recalculated constants for the Schwartz formula were 48 and 49.9, respectively, for boys > or =13 years old, and 38 and 46.2, respectively, for all girls and for boys <13 years old. Using published constants, there was agreement between GFR and Cockcroft-Gault formula in boys > or =13 years old (average bias 5.0 +/- 23.5%) while there was an average error of -19.0%+/- 36.4% for all ages. Similarly, the average bias with Schwartz for boys > or =13 years old was -6.8 +/- 24.0% and for all patients was -12.8 +/- 24.2%. Using recalculated constants, the average bias with Cockcroft-Gault in boys > or =13 years old was -19.8 +/- 23.5% and for all patients was -38.5 +/- 35.2%. Similarly, the average bias with Schwartz for boys < or =13 years old was -1.1 +/- 24.3% and for all patients was 3.0 +/- 24.0%. The novel cystatin C-based GFR calculations showed an average error of -4.9 +/- 20.3% in the adolescent boys and 2.4 +/- 20.4% for all ages. CONCLUSION: Cockcroft-Gault formula showed the worst agreement with GFR, regardless of using published or recalculated constants. The cystatin C-based approach resulted in the least error, and should be used for estimation of GFR.     

Cystatin C is a more sensitive marker than creatinine for the estimation of GFR in type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best overall index of renal function in health and disease. Inulin and 51Cr-EDTA plasma clearances are considered the gold standard methods for estimating GFR. Unfortunately, these methods require specialized technical personnel over a period of several hours and high costs. In clinical practice, serum creatinine is the most widely used index for the noninvasive assessment of GFR. Despite its specificity, serum creatinine demonstrates an inadequate sensitivity, particularly in the early stages of renal impairment. Recently, cystatin C, a low molecular mass plasma protein freely filtered through the glomerulus and almost completely reabsorbed and catabolized by tubular cells, has been proposed as a new and very sensitive serum marker of changes in GFR. This study was designed to test whether serum cystatin C can replace serum creatinine for the early assessment of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The study was performed on 52 Caucasian type 2 diabetic patients. Patients with an abnormal albumin excretion rate (AER) were carefully examined to rule out non-diabetic renal diseases by ultrasonography, urine bacteriology, microscopic urine analysis, and kidney biopsy. Serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, AER, serum lipids, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured. GFR was estimated by the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA. In addition the Cockcroft and Gault formula (Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR) was calculated. RESULTS: Cystatin C serum concentration progressively increased as GFR decreased. The overall relationship between the reciprocal cystatin C and GFR was significantly stronger (r = 0.84) than those between serum creatinine and GFR (r = 0.65) and between Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR and GFR (r = 0.70). As GFR decreased from 120 to 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, cystatin C increased more significantly that serum creatinine, giving a stronger signal in comparison to that of creatinine over the range of the measured GFR. The maximum diagnostic accuracy of serum cystatin C (90%) was significantly better than those of serum creatinine (77%) and Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR (85%) in discriminating between type 2 diabetic patients with normal GFR (>80 mL/min per 1.73 m2) and those with reduced GFR (<80 mL/min/1.73 m2). In particular, the cystatin C cut-off limit of 0.93 mg/L corresponded to a false-positive rate of 7.7% and to a false-negative rate of 1.9%; the serum creatinine cut-off limit of 87.5 micromol/L corresponded to a false-positive rate of 5.8% and to a false-negative rate of 17.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C may be considered as an alternative and more accurate serum marker than serum creatinine or the Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR in discriminating type 2 diabetic patients with reduced GFR from those with normal GFR.     

Comparison of serum cystatin C and creatinine levels in determining glomerular filtration rate in children with stage I to III chronic renal disease

Abstract

Background: Pediatric studies are relatively scarce on the superiority of cystatin C over creatinine in estimation of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). This study measured cystatin C and serum creatinine levels, and compared GFR estimated from these two parameters in patients with chronic renal disease. Methods: This prospective, observational, controlled study included 166 patients aged 1–18 years diagnosed with stage I to III chronic renal disease, and 29 age- and sex-matched control subjects. In all patients, GFR was estimated via creatinine clearance, Schwartz formula, Zappitelli 1 and Zappitelli 2 formula and the results were compared using Bland–Altman analysis. Results: Patients and controls did not differ with regard to height, body weight, BMI, serum creatinine and serum cystatin levels, and Schwartz formula-based GFR (p?>?0.05). There was a significant relationship between creatinine and cystatin C levels. However, although creatinine levels showed a significant association with age, height, and BMI, cystatin C levels showed no such association. ROC analysis showed that cystatin C performed better than creatinine in detecting low GFR. Conclusion: Cystatin C is a more sensitive and feasible indicator than creatinine for the diagnosis of stage I to III chronic renal disease.     

Measuring glomerular filtration rate with cystatin C and beta-trace protein in children with spina bifida

PURPOSE: We compared the diagnostic performance of cystatin C and beta-trace protein with serum creatinine and the Schwartz formula for the estimation of glomerular filtration rate in children with spina bifida. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystatin C, beta-trace protein and serum creatinine in children who underwent routine measurement of glomerular filtration rate were obtained in a prospective study. A spina bifida group (27 measurements in 27 patients 1.4 to 20.0 years old, 15 female, 12 male) was compared with a group of controls (211 measurements in 201 patients with various other renal pathologies 1.0 to 20.2 years old, 89 female, 122 male). All patients underwent nuclear medicine clearance investigations with 99mtechnetium diethylenetetraminepentaacetic acid. Z scores were calculated for body mass index, height and weight. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and ROC plots were done to assess their diagnostic accuracy. RESULTS: Serum creatinine and the Schwartz formula did not correlate with glomerular filtration rate in the patients with spina bifida. Correlation coefficients for cystatin C were 0.45 and 0.84 in the spina bifida and control groups, respectively, while correlation coefficients for beta-trace protein were 0.31 and 0.75, respectively. For both groups ROC area was highest for cystatin C (up to 0.97 ROC area in control group). CONCLUSIONS: Only cystatin C served as a suitable marker to estimate glomerular filtration rate in patients with spina bifida. Cystatin C proved to be a superior marker in patients with spina bifida. In the control group the Schwartz formula was comparable to cystatin C and beta-trace protein, although cystatin C remained superior.     

Serum cystatin C--a superior marker of rapidly reduced glomerular filtration after uninephrectomy in kidney donors compared to creatinine

AIMS: Acute renal failure (ARF), defined by a rapid decrease of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is associated with high mortality. Early and accurate detection of decreasing GFR is critical to prevent the progression of ARF and to potentially improve its outcome. Serum creatinine, the conventional GFR marker, has major limitations. We prospectively evaluated whether serum cystatin C detected a rapid GFR decrease earlier and more accurately than serum creatinine. METHODS: In ten patients undergoing nephrectomy for living related kidney transplantation, serum creatinine and cystatin C were determined daily. The decrease of GFR was quantitated preoperatively by creatinine clearance and MAG3 scintigraphy. The GFR decrease was defined by a 50-100% increase of cystatin C or creatinine from preoperative values. Ten patients without renal impairment served as controls. RESULTS: Initially, patients had a creatinine clearance of 105 +/- 14 ml/min/1.73 m2. Due to nephrectomy, patients lost 45 +/- 3% of their renal function. Serum cystatin C significantly increased already one, serum creatinine two days after nephrectomy. Cystatin C demonstrated an increase by 50-100% 1.4 +/- 0.9 days earlier than creatinine (p = 0.009). Serum cystatin C performed well detecting the GFR decrease with higher diagnostic values compared to creatinine. This was indicated by a sensitivity of 50, 70 and 80% of cystatin C to detect the GFR decrease on the three days following nephrectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Serum cystatin C detects rapid GFR decreases one to two days earlier than creatinine. Cystatin C is an early and accurate marker to detect rapid GFR decreases as in ARF.     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous parameter of the renal function in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C is a proteinase inhibitor with a low molecular weight. The serum levels of cystatin C are mainly dependent on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) making cystatin C an endogenous parameter of GFR. The aim of the study was to elucidate the applicability of serum cystatin C as a parameter of GFR in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function and to estimate a reference interval for serum cystatin C. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients (25 males and 21 females) aged 22 to 83 years with various kidney diseases and 250 blood donors (164 males and 86 females) aged 19 to 64 years were included. Cystatin C was measured by an automated particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay, serum creatinine by an enzymatic and by Jaffé method, urine creatinine by an enzymatic method, and GFR by 99mTc-DTPA clearance. RESULTS: Serum levels ofcystatin C and creatinine showed increments with decreasing values of 99mTc-DTPA clearance and a linear relationship was found between 99mTc-DTPA clearance and l/serum cystatin C, l/serum creatinine (enzymatic method), and creatinine clearance. Comparison of the non-parametric receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots for serum cystatin C (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.996; SE = 0.005), serum creatinine (enzymatic method) (AUC = 0.899; SE = 0.044), serum creatinine (Jaffé method) (AUC = 0.870; SE = 0.051), measured creatinine clearance (AUC = 0.959; SE = 0.025), and estimated creatinine clearance (0.950; SE = 0.029) revealed significant differences for serum cystatin C and serum creatinine (enzymatic and Jaffé method) (p values: 0.03 and 0.01). No significant differences were demonstrated between serum cystatin C and measured and estimated creatinine clearance (p value: 0.14 and 0.12). The non-parametric reference interval for serum cystatin C was calculated to be 0.51-1.02 mg/l (median: 0.79 mg/l; range: 0.33 - 1.07 mg/l). CONCLUSION: Serum cystatin C seems to be a better parameter of GFR than serum creatinine in adults with various types of kidney disease with normal to moderately impaired kidney function.     

Cystatin C does not detect acute changes in glomerular filtration rate in early diabetic nephropathy

BACKGROUND: The measurement of renal functional reserve (acute change in glomerular filtration rate [GFR] after protein load) allows the detection of sub-clinical renal dysfunction and has prognostic implications in diabetes. Our aim was to test cystatin C as an index of GFR and renal functional reserve. METHODS: GFR was measured by C(Sinistrin) at baseline and after protein load in 28 diabetic patients with serum creatinine <1.2 mg/dL. The C(Sinistrin) was compared with cystatin C, serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and Cockcroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: Baseline C(Sinistrin) ranged from 67-172 mL/min. Regression analysis showed an overall low relationship between C(Sinistrin) and the indirect markers of GFR. The highest correlation with C(Sinistrin) was obtained for cystatin C clearance (R(2) = 0.58, r = 0.76, p < 0.001), the 1/serum cystatin C (R(2) = 0.58, r = 0.76, p < 0.001), and serum cystatin C (R(2) = 0.52, r = 0.72, p < 0.001). Renal functional reserve was preserved in 6 of 28 patients. There was no significant change in cystatin C in response to protein load. CONCLUSION: Wide variation in baseline GFR emphasizes the need for the early detection of renal dysfunction. Cystatin C correlated best with C(Sinistrin) at baseline, but did not detect renal functional reserve.     

肾移植术后随访中检测受者血清胱抑素C的临床价值

目的 探讨血清胱抑素C(SCys C)浓度检测能否作为肾移植受者随访中移植肾功能测定的理想指标.方法 选择肾移植术后接受长期随访的受者70例,于随访当日检测受者SCys C和血清肌酐(SCr)水平,同时用99mTc-DTPA肾动态显像测定肾小球滤过率(GFR),比较SCys C和SCr与GFR的相关性,并应用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)评价两者在诊断移植肾功能轻度损伤(GFR＜1 ml/s)中的效果.结果 随访的肾移植受者中,SCys C和SCr与GFR均呈负相关,相关系数分别为-0.82和-0.66(P＜0.01).SCys C用于诊断移植肾功能轻度损伤的敏感度、特异度和阳性预测值(PPV)均高于SCr.SCys C的ROC曲线下面积高于SCr(分别为0.935和0.877),但两者比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 在肾移植术后的随访中,受者SCys C与GFR的相关性比SCr更高,可作为评估移植肾功能的较理想指标.     

Correlation between cystatin C- and renal scan-determined glomerular filtration rate in children with spina bifida

We report on the relationships between serum cystatin C level, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated from a cystatin C-based prediction equation (that of Filler and Lepage), GFR calculated by the Schwartz formula and technetium 99m-diethylene triamine penta-acetic acid (⁹⁹Tc-DTPA)-determined GFR in 28 children with spina bifida. All children underwent measurement of height, weight, serum cystatin C level, and serum creatinine level at the time of their renal scan. The relationship between variables was assessed by Pearson correlation. Pearson correlation for the relationship between ⁹⁹Tc-DTPA GFR and GFR calculated by the cystatin C-based equation was significant and higher than that of the relationship between ⁹⁹Tc-DTPA GFR and GFR calculated by the Schwartz equation, which was not statistically significant. The correlation for Filler GFR was 0.42 (P = 0.03) and for Schwartz GFR was 0.21 (P = 0.28). Although we use renal scan determination of GFR as the best measure, and a creatinine-based formula as the most practical measure, perhaps a formula such as that published by Filler and Lepage, which is not dependent on anthropometric data, might be a more useful (and accurate) tool for establishing GFR in children with spina bifida.     

Estimating glomerular filtration rate in kidney transplantation: a comparison between serum creatinine and cystatin C-based methods

Accurate measurement of GFR is critical for the evaluation of new therapies and the care of renal transplant recipients. Although not accurate in renal transplantation, GFR is often estimated using creatinine-based equations. Cystatin C is a marker of GFR that seems to be more accurate than creatinine. Equations to predict GFR based on the serum cystatin C concentration have been developed, but their accuracy in transplantation is unknown. GFR was estimated using four equations (Filler, Le Bricon, Larsson, and Hoek) that are based on serum cystatin C and seven equations that are based on serum creatinine in 117 adult renal transplant recipients. GFR was measured using radiolabeled diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA), and the bias, precision, and accuracy of each equation were determined. The mean (99m)Tc-DTPA GFR was 58 +/- 23 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). The cystatin C-based equations of Filler and Le Bricon had the lowest bias (-1.7 and -3.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), greatest precision (11.4 and 11.8 ml/min per 1.73 m2), and highest accuracy (87 and 89% within 30% of measured GFR, respectively). The cystatin C equations remained accurate even when the measured GFR was >60 ml/min per 1.73 m2. The creatinine-based equations were not as accurate, with only 53 to 80% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR. Cystatin C-based equations are more accurate at predicting GFR in renal transplant recipients than traditional creatinine-based equations. Further prospective studies with repetitive measurement of cystatin C are needed to determine whether cystatin C-based estimates of GFR will be sufficiently accurate to monitor long-term allograft function.     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function.

BACKGROUND: Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, serum cystatin C was proposed as a new endogenous marker of GFR and in our study its diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of other markers of GFR. METHODS: In this study, 164 patients with CKD stages 2-3 (GFR 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m2), who had performed 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid clearance, were enrolled. In each patient, serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were determined. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault (C&G) and the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formulas. RESULTS: The mean 51CrEDTA clearance was 57 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean serum creatinine 149 micromol/l and the mean serum cystatin C 1.74 mg/l. We found significant correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum creatinine (R = -0.666), serum cystatin C (R = -0.792), reciprocal of serum creatinine (R = 0.628), reciprocal of serum cystatin C (R = 0.753) and calculated creatinine clearance from the formulas C&G (R = 0.515) and MDRD formulas (R = 0.716). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (cut-off for GFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) showed that serum cystatin C had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine (P = 0.04) and calculated creatinine clearance from the C&G formula (P < 0.0001), though only in female patients. No difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between serum cystatin C and creatinine clearance calculated from the MDRD formula. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that serum cystatin C is a reliable marker of GFR in patients with mildly to moderately impaired kidney function and has a higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine and calculated creatinine clearance from the C&G formula in female patients.     

To what extent estimated or measured GFR could predict subclinical graft fibrosis: a comparative prospective study with protocol biopsies

Monitoring of allograft function entails methods more accurate than serum creatinine and creatinine‐based GFR equations (eGFR). This prospective trial aimed at investigating the diagnostic accuracy of creatinine‐ and cystatin C‐based eGFR with measured GFR (mGFR) and compared them with graft fibrosis detected by protocol biopsies (PBx). Forty‐four kidney transplant recipients were enrolled. PBx were obtained postengraftment and at 6th and 12th months. GFR was measured by Tc‐99m DTPA at 3th, 6th, and 12th months after transplantation. Significant correlation existed between eGFR and mGFR at 3, 6, and 12 months (P < 0.0001). Cystatin C‐based Hoek and Larsson equations had the lowest bias and highest accuracy. The sum of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy score increased from implantation to 6th and 12th months (0.52 ± 0.79, 0.84 ± 0.88, 1.50 ± 1.35). This was accompanied by reduction of mGFR from 54.1 ± 15.2 to 49.9 ± 15.2 and 46.8 ± 16.5 ml/min/1.73 m², while serum creatinine, cystatin C, and eGFR remained stable. Neither creatinine‐ nor cystatin C‐based GFR equations are reliable for detecting insidious graft fibrosis. In the first year after transplantation, mGFR, with its best proximity to histopathology, can be used to monitor allograft function and insidious graft fibrosis.     

Cystatin C,creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration,and long-term mortality in stroke patients

Renal dysfunction is associated with mortality in patients after ischemic stroke. Cystatin C is a potentially superior marker of renal function compared to creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In our observational cohort study, 390 Caucasian patients suffered from acute ischemic stroke (mean age 70.9 years; 183 women and 207 men) were included and prospectively followed up to maximal 56 months. Serum creatinine and cystatin C were measured at admission to the hospital; GFR was estimated according to CKD-EPI creatinine and CKD-EPI creatinine/cystatin equations. According to values of serum creatinine, estimated GFR and serum cystatin C patients were divided into quintiles. In the follow-up period, 191 (49%) patients died. For serum cystatin C and estimated GFR based on creatinine and cystatin C, the mortality and the hazard ratios for long-term mortality increased from the first to the fifth quintile nearly linearly. The associations of serum creatinine and estimated GFR categories based on creatinine with long-term mortality were J-shaped. As compared with lowest quintile of serum cystatin C, the fifth quintile was associated with long-term mortality significantly also after multivariate adjustment (age, gender, initial stroke severity, known risk factors for stroke mortality). In contrast, in adjusted analysis serum creatinine and estimated GFR (CKD-EPI creatinine and CKD-EPI creatinine/cystatin) were not associated with long-term mortality. In summary, serum cystatin C was independently and better associated with the risk of long-term mortality in patients suffering from ischemic stroke than were creatinine and estimated GFR using both CKD-EPI equations.     

Correlation of the Glomerular Filtration Rate Measured With the Use of DTPA-Tc99m in Live Kidney Donors With Equations Based on Creatinine and Cystatin C

Background

Renal donation leads to a risk of developing chronic kidney disease, with an incidence of 0.47%. To evaluate for its presence, formulas based on serum creatinine are used, but up to 80% of these formulas underestimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in donors. The aim of this work was to confirm the highest correlation of the GFR as measured with the use of DTPA-Tc99m with the GFR as estimated by means of the formula based on serum cystatin C (CKD-EPI creatinine–cystatin C) in healthy kidney donors.

Performance of cystatin C-based equations in a pediatric cohort at high risk of kidney injury

Background

Limited data exist on the performance of cystatin C-based glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equations in pediatric transplant recipients and other high-risk patients. The aim of our study was therefore to evaluate the performance of current cystatin C-based equations in this population.

Methods

This was a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 141 consecutive patients (58 % post-transplant) who received a nuclear medicine GFR (NucGFR) examination using ^99mTc- diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid at our institution. Subjects included children receiving liver, kidney or hematopoietic stem cell transplants and patients with oncologic or urologic disease. GFR estimates using published GFR estimating equations, including those based on cystatin C (Filler, Zappitelli, Larsson, Hoek, Rule and Le Bricon equations, respectively) and on both cystatin C and creatinine (Zappitelli, Bouvet and Schwartz equations, respectively), were evaluated and compared to the NucGFR measurement using Bland–Altman analysis.

Results

The mean NucGFR was 95 (interquartile range 76–111)  ml/min/1.73 m². Of the cystatin C-based equations, the Rule, Hoek, Zappitelli and Schwartz (2009 CKiD equation) formulas provided the closest agreement to the NucGFR estimate. All other formulas overestimated the GFR in our cohort.

Conclusion

Cystatin C-based GFR formulas can provide an accurate estimation of NucGFR in a pediatric population with a high proportion of transplant recipients and oncology patients.     

Serum cystatin C as an index of renal function in kidney transplant patients

Management of renal transplant patients requires periodic measurement of renal function, which is usually assessed by measuring the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The most commonly used marker for GFR is serum creatinine, although muscle wasting and tubular secretion may lead to overestimation of the actual GFR. Serum concentrations of the low-molecular-weight proteins, cystatin C and beta(2)-microglobulin (B(2)M), may afford useful markers to determine a reduced GFR. We investigated whether these molecules provide reliable indicators of renal function in 75 renal transplant patients. Cystatin C and B(2)M correlated significantly with creatinine (r =.648, P <.05 and r =.578, P <.05, respectively). Inverse serum creatinine was superior to inverse cystatin C and inverse B(2)M when renal function equations were used (r =.95, P <.05, according to MDRD; r =.87, P <.05, according to Cockroft-Gault). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to quantitate the accuracy of the different markers to detect reduced GFR using a cutoff value of 70 mL/min. No significant difference between the areas under the ROC curves comparing cystatin C and B(2)M was observed; however, serum creatinine demonstrated a significantly greater value than cystatin C (.981 vs.724, P =.001). We conclude that serum creatinine is a more efficacious marker than serum cystatin C to assess renal function.     

Glomerular filtration rate and prevalence of chronic kidney disease in Wilms�� tumour survivors

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was evaluated in 32 Wilms' tumour survivors (WTs) in a cross-sectional study using 99 Tc-diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (99 Tc-DTPA) clearance, the Schwartz formula, the new Schwartz equation for chronic kidney disease (CKD), cystatin C serum concentration and the Filler formula. Kidney damage was established by beta-2-microglobulin (B-2-M) and albumin urine excretion, urine sediment and ultrasound examination. Blood pressure was measured. No differences were found between the mean GFR in 99 Tc-DTPA and the new Schwartz equation for CKD (91.8 ± 11.3 vs. 94.3 ± 10.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2) [p?=?0.55] respectively). No differences were observed between estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) using the Schwartz formula and the Filler formula either (122.3 ± 19.9 vs. 129.8 ± 23.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2) [p = 0.28] respectively). Increased urine albumin and B-2-M excretion, which are signs of kidney damage, were found in 7 (22%) and 3 (9.4%) WTs respectively. Ultrasound signs of kidney damage were found in 14 patients (43%). Five patients (15.6%) had more than one sign of kidney damage. Eighteen individuals (56.25%) had CKD stage I (10 with signs of kidney damage; 8 without). Fourteen individuals (43.75%) had CKD stage II (6 with signs of kidney damage; 8 without). The new Schwartz equation for CKD better estimated GFR in comparison to the Schwartz formula and the Filler formula. Furthermore, the WT survivors had signs of kidney damage despite the fact that GFR was not decreased below 90 ml/min/1.73 m(2) with 99 Tc- DTPA.     

Time course of serial cystatin C levels in comparison with serum creatinine after application of radiocontrast media

BACKGROUND: The delayed increase of creatinine after radiocontrast application is a potential reason for overlooking radiocontrast nephrotoxicity. Cystatin C may be more useful to rapidly assess a decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We compared cystatin C and creatinine to examine their kinetics after application of radiocontrast media. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients (60.8 +/- 8.8 years, 68% males) with normal to subnormal GFR scheduled for coronary angiography (27% with angioplasty), were studied for serum cystatin C and creatinine levels before, 5 h, 24 h and 48 h after angiography. Furthermore, alpha1-microglobulin was checked for evidence of tubular damage. RESULTS: At 5 hours after angiography, there was no significant change compared to baseline in either serum creatinine nor cystatin C. In comparison with the value immediately before coronary angiography, the increase of cystatin C achieved a maximum at 24 h after the application of the contrast agent (+7.2%). Within 48 h, cystatin C decreased to the level before angiography. Serum creatinine increased at 24 h (+7.7%) and continued to increase at 48 h (+11.3%). CONCLUSION: Cystatin C increases earlier after radiocontrast application compared with creatinine. Therefore, cystatin C needs to be investigated as a potential early marker for nephrotoxicity, especially in the upcoming setting of short-time hospitalizations for coronary angiographies and interventions. Thus, further studies in patients with renal failure undergoing radiocontrast application are warranted to assess the usefulness of cystatin C in respect of an earlier detection of radiocontrast nephrotoxicity.