An international confirmatory study of the prognostic value of early PET/CT in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: comparison between Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax

Purpose

The role of interim PET/CT in guiding therapeutic strategies in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is debated, mainly because interpretation rules vary among centres. This study aimed to explore the reproducibility and confirm the prognostic value of early PET/CT using the Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax.

Methods

This international confirmatory study retrospectively evaluated 114 patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL treated with a rituximab-containing regimen. All patients underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT at baseline (PET0) and after two cycles (PET2), with no therapy change based on the latter. Scans were interpreted by three observers using the Deauville five-point scale and ΔSUVmax between PET0 and PET2 was calculated. Interpretations were evaluated for interobserver agreement and for progression-free survival (PFS) prediction.

Results

Median follow-up was 39 months. Early PET/CT was predictive of outcome when interpreted with the Deauville criteria and ΔSUVmax. Using the five-point scale, the overall kappa value was 0.66 with the reference background set in the liver (score ≥4) and interobserver agreement was even better using a 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off (κ?=?0.83). Moreover, the prognostic value of interim PET was slightly inferior when using a Deauville score ≥4 than when using a 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off: for the Deauville score the 3-year PFS estimate was 59 % (45–73 %) in PET2-positive patients vs. 81 % (71–91 %) in PET2-negative patients (P?=?0.003); for the 66 % ΔSUVmax cut-off the 3-year PFS estimate was 44 % (23–65 %) in PET2-positive patients vs. 79 % (70–88 %) in PET2-negative patients (P?=?0.0002).

Conclusion

Although the Deauville criteria are valid for assessing the prognostic value of early PET/CT in DLBCL, computation of the ΔSUVmax leads to better performance and interobserver reproducibility, and should be preferred when a baseline scan is available.     

Combined use of 18F-FDG PET/CT and MRI for response monitoring of breast cancer during neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Purpose

To explore the potential complementary value of PET/CT and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of breast cancer and the dependency on breast cancer subtype.

Methods

We performed ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and MRI examinations before and during NAC. The imaging features evaluated on both examinations included baseline and changes in ¹⁸F-FDG maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) on PET/CT, and tumour morphology and contrast uptake kinetics on MRI. The outcome measure was a (near) pathological complete response ((near-)pCR) after surgery. Receiver operating characteristic curves with area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the relationships between patient, tumour and imaging characteristics and tumour responses.

Results

Of 93 patients, 43 achieved a (near-)pCR. The responses varied among the different breast cancer subtypes. On univariate analysis the following variables were significantly associated with (near-)pCR: age (p?=?0.033), breast cancer subtype (p?<?0.001), relative change in SUVmax on PET/CT (p?<?0.001) and relative change in largest tumour diameter on MRI (p?<?0.001). The AUC for the relative reduction in SUVmax on PET/CT was 0.78 (95 % CI 0.68–0.88), and for the relative reduction in tumour diameter at late enhancement on MRI was 0.79 (95 % CI 0.70–0.89). The AUC increased to 0.90 (95 % CI 0.83–0.96) in the final multivariate model with PET/CT, MRI and breast cancer subtype combined (p?=?0.012).

Conclusion

PET/CT and MRI showed comparable value for monitoring response during NAC. Combined use of PET/CT and MRI had complementary potential. Research with more patients is required to further elucidate the dependency on breast cancer subtype.     

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET/CT to evaluate tumor, nodal disease, and gross tumor volume of oropharyngeal and oral cavity cancer: comparison with MR imaging and validation with surgical specimen

Introduction

The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the impact of adding combined ¹⁸F-PET/CT to MRI for T and N staging of the oral and oropharyngeal cancer and calculation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) having histopathology as reference standard.

Methods

PET/CT and MRI were performed in 66 patients with suspected oral and oropharyngeal cancer (41 primary tumors/25 recurrent tumors) and nodal disease (114 nodes). Statistical analysis included the McNemar test, sensitivity, specificity for the diagnostic modalities as well as regression analysis, and Bland–Altman graphs for calculated tumor volumes.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two modalities compared to pathological findings regarding detection of disease (P?≥?0.72). The sensitivity/specificity for tumor detection were 100/80% and 96.72/60% for MRI and PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity/specificity for nodal metastases were 88.46/75% and 83.81/73.91% for MRI and PET/CT, respectively. In 18% of cases, the MRI-based T staging resulted in an overestimation of the pathologic tumor stage. The corresponding rate for PET/CT was 22%. Regarding the treated necks, both modalities showed 100% sensitivity for detection of the recurrent lesions. In necks with histologically N0 staging, MRI and PET/CT gave 22% and 26% false positive findings, respectively. The mean tumor volume in the pathologic specimen was 16.6?±?18.6 ml, the mean volume derived by the MR imaging was 17.6?±?19.1 ml while the estimated by PET/CT volume was 18.8?±?18.1 ml (P?≤?0.007 between the three methods). The Bland–Altman analysis showed a better agreement between PET/CT and MRI.

Conclusion

The diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/CT in the local staging of oral cancer is not superior to MRI.     

Evaluation of <Superscript>68</Superscript>Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI for whole-body staging of neuroendocrine tumours in comparison with <Superscript>68</Superscript>Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT

Objectives

To compare the diagnostic performance of ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in the whole-body staging of patients with neuroendocrine tumours (NET).

Methods

Thirty patients with histopathologically confirmed NET underwent PET/CT and PET/MRI in a single-injection protocol. PET/CT and PET/MRI scans were prospectively evaluated with regard to lesion count, localization, nature (NET/non-NET), and conspicuity (four-point scale). Histopathology and follow-up imaging served as the reference standards. The proportions of NET and non-NET lesions rated correctly were compared using McNemar’s chi-squared test. The Wilcoxon test was used to assess differences in SUVmax and lesion conspicuity. The correlation between the SUVmax for the same lesions from each modality was analysed using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r).

Results

According to the reference standard, there were 197 lesions (142 NET, 55 non-NET). Lesion-based analysis showed a higher proportion of correctly rated NET lesions on PET/MRI than on PET/CT (90.8% vs. 86.7%, p?=?0.031), whereas on PET/CT there was a higher proportion of correctly rated non-NET lesions (94.5% vs. 83.6%, p?=?0.031). SUVmax was strongly correlated (r?=?0.86; p?<?0.001) and did not differ significantly (p?=?0.35) between the modalities. Overall conspicuity and NET lesion conspicuity were higher on PET/MRI (both p?<?0.01).

Conclusions

Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI yielded a higher proportion of correctly rated NET lesions and should be regarded as a valuable alternative to ⁶⁸Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT in whole-body staging of NET patients.

Key Points

? ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI correctly identified more NET lesions than ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. ? ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATOC PET/MRI provides better NET lesion conspicuity than ⁶⁸ Ga-DOTATOC PET/CT. ? SUVmax values from the two modalities are strongly correlated and do not differ significantly.

     

18F-FDG PET/CT imaging versus dynamic contrast-enhanced CT for staging and prognosis of inflammatory breast cancer

Purpose

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is the most aggressive type of breast cancer with a poor prognosis. Locoregional staging is based on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) CT or MRI. The aim of this study was to compare the performances of FDG PET/CT and DCE CT in locoregional staging of IBC and to assess their respective prognostic values.

Methods

The study group comprised 50 women (median age: 51?±?11 years) followed in our institution for IBC who underwent FDG PET/CT and DCE CT scans (median interval 5?±?9 days). CT enhancement parameters were net maximal enhancement, net early enhancement and perfusion.

Results

The PET/CT scans showed intense FDG uptake in all primary tumours. Concordance rate between PET/CT and DCE CT for breast tumour localization was 92 %. No significant correlation was found between SUVmax and CT enhancement parameters in primary tumours (p?>?0.6). PET/CT and DCE CT results were poorly correlated for skin infiltration (kappa?=?0.19). Ipsilateral foci of increased axillary FDG uptake were found in 47 patients (median SUV: 7.9?±?5.4), whereas enlarged axillary lymph nodes were observed on DCE CT in 43 patients. Results for axillary node involvement were fairly well correlated (kappa?=?0.55). Nineteen patients (38 %) were found to be metastatic on PET/CT scan with a significant shorter progression-free survival than patients without distant lesions (p?=?0.01). In the primary tumour, no statistically significant difference was observed between high and moderate tumour FDG uptake on survival, using an SUVmax cut-off of 5 (p?=?0.7 and 0.9), or between high and low tumour enhancement on DCE CT (p?>?0.8).

Conclusion

FDG PET/CT imaging provided additional information concerning locoregional involvement to that provided by DCE CT on and allowed detection of distant metastases in the same whole-body procedure. Tumour FDG uptake or CT enhancement parameters were not correlated and were not found to have any prognostic value.     

Preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer: prospective comparison of PET/MR and PET/CT

Objectives

To prospectively compare the accuracies of PET/MR and PET/CT in the preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Institutional review board approval and patients’ informed consents were obtained. 45 patients with proven or radiologically suspected lung cancer which appeared to be resectable on CT were enrolled. PET/MR was performed for the preoperative staging of NSCLC followed by PET/CT without contrast enhancement on the same day. Dedicated MR images including diffusion weighted images were obtained. Readers assessed PET/MR and PET/CT with contrast-enhanced CT. Accuracies of PET/MR and PET/CT for NSCLC staging were compared.

Results

Primary tumour stages (n?=?40) were correctly diagnosed in 32 patients (80.0 %) on PET/MR and in 32 patients (80.0 %) on PET/CT (P?=?1.0). Node stages (n?=?42) were correctly determined in 24 patients (57.1 %) on PET/MR and in 22 patients (52.4 %) on PET/CT (P?=?0.683). Metastatic lesions in the brain, bone, liver, and pleura were detected in 6 patients (13.3 %). PET/MR missed one patient with pleural metastasis while PET/CT missed one patient with solitary brain metastasis and two patients with pleural metastases (P?=?0.480).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that PET/MR in combination with contrast-enhanced CT was comparable to PET/CT in the preoperative staging of NSCLC while reducing radiation exposure.

Key points

? PET/MR can be comparable to PET/CT for preoperative NSCLC staging.? PET/MR and PET/CT show excellent correlation in measuring SUVmax of primary lesions.? Using PET/MR, estimated radiation dose can decrease by 31.1?% compared with PET/CT.

     

Comparison of the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo)

Purpose

To compare the clinical performance of upper abdominal PET/DCE-MRI with and without concurrent respiratory motion correction (MoCo).

Methods

MoCo PET/DCE-MRI of the upper abdomen was acquired in 44 consecutive oncologic patients and compared with non-MoCo PET/MRI. SUVmax and MTV of FDG-avid upper abdominal malignant lesions were assessed on MoCo and non-MoCo PET images. Image quality was compared between MoCo DCE-MRI and non-MoCo CE-MRI, and between fused MoCo PET/MRI and fused non-MoCo PET/MRI images.

Results

MoCo PET resulted in higher SUVmax (10.8?±?5.45) than non-MoCo PET (9.62?±?5.42) and lower MTV (35.55?±?141.95 cm³) than non-MoCo PET (38.11?±?198.14 cm³; p?<?0.005 for both). The quality of MoCo DCE-MRI images (4.73?±?0.5) was higher than that of non-MoCo CE-MRI images (4.53±0.71; p?=?0.037). The quality of fused MoCo-PET/MRI images (4.96?±?0.16) was higher than that of fused non-MoCo PET/MRI images (4.39?±?0.66; p?<?0.005).

Conclusion

MoCo PET/MRI provided qualitatively better images than non-MoCo PET/MRI, and upper abdominal malignant lesions demonstrated higher SUVmax and lower MTV on MoCo PET/MRI.

     

Standardized uptake values for [F] FDG in normal organ tissues: Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI

Purpose

To compare maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax/mean) of normal organ tissues derived from [¹⁸F]-fluoro-desoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (PET/MRI) using MR attenuation correction (MRAC) (DIXON-based 4-segment μ-map) with [¹⁸F]-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using CT-based attenuation correction (CTAC).

Methods and materials

In 25 oncologic patients (15 men, 10 women; age 57 ± 13 years) after routine whole-body FDG-PET/CT (60 min after injection of 290 ± 40 MBq [¹⁸F]-FDG) a whole-body PET/MRI was performed (Magnetom Biograph mMR™, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). Volumes of interest of 1.0 cm³ were drawn in 7 physiological organ sites in MRAC-PET and the corresponding CTAC-PET images manually. Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated to compare MRAC- and CTAC based SUV values; Wilcoxon-Matched-Pairs signed ranks test was performed to test for potential differences.

Results

The mean delay between FDG-PET/CT and PET/MRI was 92 ± 18 min. Excellent correlations of SUV values were found for the heart muscle (SUVmax/mean: R = 0.97/0.97); reasonably good correlations were found for the liver (R = 0.65/0.72), bone marrow (R = 0.42/0.41) and the SUVmax of the psoas muscle (R = 0.41). For subcutaneous fat, the correlation coefficient was 0.66 for SUVmean (p < 0.05). Correlations between MRAC and CTAC were non-significant for SUVmean of the psoas muscle, SUVmax of subcutaneous fat, SUVmax and SUVmean of the lungs, SUVmax and SUVmean of the blood-pool. The median SUVmax and SUVmean in MRAC-PET were lower than the respective CTAC values in all organs (p < 0.05) but heart (SUVmax) and the bone marrow (SUVmean).

Conclusion

In conclusion, in oncologic patients examined with PET/CT and PET/MRI SUVmax and SUVmean values generally correlate well in normal organ tissues, except the lung, subcutaneous fat and the blood pool. SUVmax and SUVmean derived from PET/MRI can be used reliably in clinical routine.     

Contrast medium injection protocol adjusted for body surface area in combined PET/CT

Objectives

To evaluate the effect of contrast medium dose adjustment for body surface area (BSA) compared with a fixed-dose protocol in combined positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT).

Methods

One hundred and twenty patients were prospectively included for ¹⁸F-2-deoxy-fluor-glucose (¹⁸F-FDG)-PET/CT consisting of a non-enhanced and a venous contrast-enhanced CT, both used for PET attenuation correction. The first 60 consecutive patients received a fixed 148-ml contrast medium dose. The second 60 patients received a dose that was based on their calculated BSA. Mean and maximum standardised FDG uptake (SUVmean and SUVmax) and contrast enhancement (HU) were measured at multiple anatomical sites and PET reconstructions were evaluated visually for image quality.

Results

A decrease in the variance of contrast enhancement in the BSA group compared with the fixed-dose group was seen at all anatomical sites. Comparison of tracer uptake SUVmean and SUVmax between the fixed and the BSA group revealed no significant differences at all anatomical sites (all P?>?0.05). Comparison of the overall image quality scores between the fixed and the BSA group showed no significant difference (P?=?0.753).

Conclusions

BSA adjustment results in increased interpatient homogeneity of contrast enhancement without affecting PET values. In combined PET/CT, a BSA adjusted contrast medium protocol should be used preferably.

Key Points

? Intravenous contrast medium is essential for many applications of PET/CT ? Body surface area adjustment of contrast medium helps standardise contrast enhancement ? Underdosing or overdosing of contrast medium will be reduced ? PET image quality is not influenced ? BSA adjusted contrast medium protocol should be used preferably in combined PET/CT     

Accuracy and predictive features of FDG-PET/CT and CT for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis of T1 non-small-cell lung cancer manifesting as a subsolid nodule

Objectives

To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and predictive features of F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) and CT in lymph node (LN) staging of T1 non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) manifesting as subsolid nodules.

Methods

From January 2005 to May 2011, 160 patients with pathologically proven T1 subsolid NSCLCs with LN staging were included in this study. Diagnostic accuracies of FDG-PET/CT and CT for LN staging were evaluated. Maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) and CT features of primary tumours were evaluated to investigate predictive factors for LN metastasis.

Results

LN metastases were found in nine of the 160 patients (5.6%). No LN metastasis was present in patients with a solid proportion ≤50%. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of FDG-PET/CT for LN staging on a per-patient basis were 11.1%, 86.1% and 81.9%; those of CT were 11.1%, 96.7% and 91.9%. Among patients with a solid proportion >50%, there were significant differences in SUVmax, solid portion size, solid proportion and lesion location between patients with and without LN metastasis. Multivariate analysis revealed that higher SUVmax, a larger solid proportion and central location were independent predictors of LN metastasis.

Conclusions

FDG-PET/CT adds little value to CT in the lymph node staging of T1 subsolid NSCLCs.

Key Points

? Lymph node (LN) metastases are important in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ? Positron emission tomography (PET) helps to stage solid NSCLCs. ? FDG-PET/CT adds little to the LN staging of T1 subsolid NSCLCs. ? No LN metastasis in patients with a solid proportion ≤50%. ? LN metastasis is more common in solid and/or centrally sited tumours.     

Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: Lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues

Purpose

To compare the performance of PET/MRI imaging using MR attenuation correction (MRAC) (DIXON-based 4-segment -map) in breast cancer patients with that of PET/CT using CT-based attenuation correction and to compare the quantification accuracy in lesions and in normal organ tissues.

Methods

A total of 36 patients underwent a whole-body PET/CT scan 1 h after injection and an average of 62 min later a second scan using a hybrid PET/MRI system. PET/MRI and PET/CT were compared visually by rating anatomic allocation and image contrast. Regional tracer uptake in lesions was quantified using volumes of interest, and maximal and mean standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively) were calculated. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of each lesion was computed on PET/MRI and PET/CT. Tracer uptake in normal organ tissue was assessed as SUVmax and SUVmean in liver, spleen, left ventricular myocardium, lung, and muscle.

Results

Overall 74 FDG positive lesions were visualized by both PET/CT and PET/MRI. No significant differences in anatomic allocation scores were found between PET/CT and PERT/MRI, while contrast score of lesions on PET/MRI was significantly higher. Both SUVmax and SUVmean of lesions were significantly higher on PET/MRI than on PET/CT, with strong correlations between PET/MRI and PET/CT data (ρ = 0.71–0.88). MTVs of all lesions were 4% lower on PET/MRI than on PET/CT, but no statistically significant difference was observed, and an excellent correlation between measurements of MTV with PET/MRI and PET/CT was found (ρ = 0.95–0.97; p < 0.0001). Both SUVmax and SUVmean were significantly lower by PET/MRI than by PET/CT for lung, liver and muscle, no significant difference was observed for spleen, while either SUVmax and SUVmean of myocardium were significantly higher by PET/MRI. High correlations were found between PET/MRI and PET/CT for both SUVmax and SUVmean of the left ventricular myocardium (ρ = 0.91; p < 0.0001), while moderate correlations were found for the other normal organ tissues (ρ = 0.36–0.61; p < 0.05).

Conclusions

PET/MRI showed equivalent performance in terms of qualitative lesion detection to PET/CT. Despite significant differences in tracer uptake quantification, due to either methodological and biological factors, PET/MRI and PET/CT measurements in lesions and normal organ tissues correlated well. This study demonstrates that integrated whole-body PET/MRI is feasible in a clinical setting with high quality and in a short examination time.     

Increased FDG uptake in breast cancer is associated with prognostic factors

Purpose

To evaluate the relationship between FDG uptake and prognostic factors of breast cancer such as hormone receptors (estrogen and progesterone), expression of c-erbB-2, axillary lymph node status, tumor histology, grade and size.

Materials and methods

Between May 2009 and February 2011; 79 patients (mean age?±?SD: 52.9?±?13.9?years) with biopsy proven breast cancer underwent F-18 FDG PET/CT scanning for staging. Patients with excisional biopsy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded from the study. Histological types included were invasive ductal carcinoma (n?=?68), invasive lobular carcinoma (n?=?2), and invasive ductal plus lobular mixed carcinoma (n?=?9). Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) were compared with estrogen (ER) and progesterone receptors (PR), expression of c-erbB-2, as well as tumor grade and tumor size. For the evaluation of relationship between tumor SUVmax values and prognosticators such as hormone receptors, tumor histologic grade, and tumor size, statistical analyses were performed using Student t test, Mann?CWhitney U Test and Pearson correlation coefficient and p values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistically significant differences.

Results

All primary breast neoplasms were detected by PET/CT scanner. The mean SUVmax values and breast cancer tumor sizes ranged from 2.09 to 39.0 and 0.7 to 10?cm, respectively. Tumors with negative ER [(n?=?19); SUVmax median (min?Cmax): 15 (2.09?C39.0)] were associated with higher SUVmax values (p?=?0.01). Tumors with overexpression of C-erbB-2 [(n?=?28); SUVmax median (min?Cmax): 16.0 (5.0-39.0)]; tumor grade 3 [(n?=?25); SUVmax median (min?Cmax): 15 (6.43?C39)]; axillary lymph node involvement [(n?=?60); SUVmax median (min?Cmax): 13.61 (4.0?C39.0)]; tumor histopathology and increased tumor size were associated with higher maximum standardized uptake values. However, PR did not show any relationship with SUVmax values.

Conclusion

In the present report, strong relationships were detected between the negativity of ER, overexpression of c-erbB-2, tumor grade, tumor size, histopathology, axillary lymph node involvement and SUVmax values. Accordingly, we believe that SUVmax values obtained with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may provide some information about tumor biology of breast cancer.     

A proposal for combined MRI and PET/CT interpretation criteria for preoperative nodal staging in non-small-cell lung cancer

Objectives

To determine the positive reading criteria for malignant nodes when interpreting combined MRI and PET/CT images for preoperative nodal staging in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Forty-nine patients with biopsy-proven NSCLC underwent both PET/CT and thoracic MRI [diffusion weighted imaging (DWI)]. Each nodal station was evaluated for the presence of metastasis by applying either inclusive (positive if either one read positive) or exclusive (positive if both read positive) criteria in the combined interpretation of PET/CT and MRI. Nodal stage was confirmed pathologically. The combined diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT and MRI was determined on per-nodal station and per-patient bases and compared with that of PET/CT alone.

Results

In 49 patients, 39 (19%) of 206 nodal stations harboured malignant cells. Out of 206 nodal stations, 186 (90%) had concordant readings, while the rest (10%) had discordant readings. Inclusive criteria of combined PET/CT and MRI helped increase sensitivity for detecting nodal metastasis (69%) compared with PET/CT alone (46%; P?=?0.003), while specificity was not significantly decreased.

Conclusion

Inclusive criteria in combined MRI and PET/CT readings help improve significantly the sensitivity for detecting nodal metastasis compared with PET/CT alone and may decrease unnecessary open thoracotomy. Key Points ? Combined interpretation of MRI and PET/CT enhances the detection of nodal metastasis. ? Inclusive criteria of combined MRI/PET/CT improved the sensitivity for detecting nodal metastasis. ? Combined interpretation of MRI and PET/CT may reduce unnecessary open thoracotomies.     

Evaluation of the PET component of simultaneous [18F]choline PET/MRI in prostate cancer: comparison with [18F]choline PET/CT

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the positron emission tomography (PET) component of [¹⁸F]choline PET/MRI and compare it with the PET component of [¹⁸F]choline PET/CT in patients with histologically proven prostate cancer and suspected recurrent prostate cancer.

Methods

Thirty-six patients were examined with simultaneous [¹⁸F]choline PET/MRI following combined [¹⁸F]choline PET/CT. Fifty-eight PET-positive lesions in PET/CT and PET/MRI were evaluated by measuring the maximum and mean standardized uptake values (SUV_max and SUV_mean) using volume of interest (VOI) analysis. A scoring system was applied to determine the quality of the PET images of both PET/CT and PET/MRI. Agreement between PET/CT and PET/MRI regarding SUV_max and SUV_mean was tested using Pearson’s product-moment correlation and Bland-Altman analysis.

Results

All PET-positive lesions that were visible on PET/CT were also detectable on PET/MRI. The quality of the PET images was comparable in both groups. Median SUV_max and SUV_mean of all lesions were significantly lower in PET/MRI than in PET/CT (5.2 vs 6.1, p?<?0.05 and 2.0 vs 2.6, p?<?0.001, respectively). Pearson’s product-moment correlation indicated highly significant correlations between SUV_max of PET/CT and PET/MRI (R?=?0.86, p?<?0.001) as well as between SUV_mean of PET/CT and PET/MRI (R?=?0.81, p?<?0.001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed lower and upper limits of agreement of ?2.77 to 3.64 between SUV_max of PET/CT vs PET/MRI and ?1.12 to +2.23 between SUV_mean of PET/CT vs PET/MRI.

Conclusion

PET image quality of PET/MRI was comparable to that of PET/CT. A highly significant correlation between SUV_max and SUV_mean was found. Both SUV_max and SUV_mean were significantly lower in [¹⁸F]choline PET/MRI than in [¹⁸F]choline PET/CT. Differences of SUV_max and SUV_mean might be caused by different techniques of attenuation correction. Furthermore, differences in biodistribution and biokinetics of [¹⁸F]choline between the subsequent examinations and in the respective organ systems have to be taken into account.     

The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the assessment of active idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis

Purpose

The different stages in idiopathic retroperitoneal fibrosis (IRF) are generally assessed by assay of inflammatory markers and analysis of contrast-enhanced CT images of the retroperitoneal mass. We investigated the potential role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in this clinical setting.

Methods

¹⁸F-FDG uptake was assessed visually and semiquantitatively (using maximum standardized uptake values, SUVmax) in images of the abdominal mass in 22 patients prospectively enrolled from June 2008 to December 2010 who underwent a total of 33 PET/CT studies. The accuracy in discriminating active from inactive disease was calculated assuming as reference a biochemical instrumental evaluation of patients with IRF mostly based on the level of inflammatory indices and contrast enhancement (CE) of the mass at the time of each PET study. In particular, the relationship between SUVmax and CE, the latter calculated from the change in radiodensity (Hounsfield units) between the basal and postcontrast venous portal phases, was evaluated on a three-point scale (0 <20?HU, 1 20–30?HU, 2 ≥30?HU). SUVmax and CE scores were correlated with the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. The value of PET/CT in assessing the variation of disease activity over time was also investigated by analysing the changes in metabolic volume (MV) of the retroperitoneal lesion between repeat patient studies.

Results

PET/CT accurately discriminated (93.9?%) active from inactive disease. Significant agreement (p?<?0.01) was observed between visual and semiquantitative analysis of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake, and CE score. A significant correlation (p?<?0.01) was found among SUVmax, CRP levels (rho?=?0.54) and ESR (rho?=?0.55). Corresponding variations in MV and CE score were observed in patients with multiple studies (p?<?0.01; rho?=?0.68).

Conclusion

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may be considered an alternative imaging method for the assessment of different stages of IRF.     

Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy with 111In-octreotide in pulmonary carcinoid tumours correlated with pathological and 18FDG PET/CT findings

Purpose

Pulmonary carcinoid (PC) tumors are rare neoplasms of the lung with good prognosis but diagnosis may be demanding since there is no exclusive modality alone to clearly differentiate a PC tumor. The purpose of this study is to establish the diagnostic features of somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS), comparatively (where available) with ¹⁸FDG PET/CT (PET/CT) correlated with histopathologic findings.

Methods

Twenty-one patients who underwent SRS with ¹¹¹In-octreotide and were diagnosed as having PC tumors were retrospectively studied. Thirteen patients were performed PET/CT. Primary tumour size, Ki-67 indexes, image analysis data of SRS and PET/CT including maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) together with false negative, false positive, true positive and true negative lesions were documented and discussed.

Results

Eleven (52.4?%) patients were typical (TC) and 10 (47.6?%) were atypical carcinoids (AC) with mean Ki-67 indexes of 2.1 and 24?%, respectively. Patients underwent SRS for solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) characterization (n?=?12) and determination of disease extension (n?=?9). Overall sensitivity and specificity of SRS in the detection of primary tumour, lymph nodes (LN) and distant metastasis (DM) were 76 and 97?%, respectively, whereas, positive and negative predictive values were 95 and 86?%. PET/CT was performed for determining disease spread (n?=?3) and metabolic characterization (n?=?10) of SPNs. Mean SUVmax in the primary pulmonary lesion in TCs and ACs were 2.9?±?0.8 and 7.9?±?5.4, respectively. Nodal involvement (n?=?5) and DM (n?=?3) were also detected. Sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT in the detection of primary tumour, LNs and DM were 85 and 89.4?%, respectively.

Conclusion

SRS is useful in the diagnosis and monitoring of PC tumors when incorporated with ¹⁸FDG PET/CT as a primary staging tool particularly in the determination of disease spread.     

Value of a Dixon-based MR/PET attenuation correction sequence for the localization and evaluation of PET-positive lesions

Purpose

In this study, the potential contribution of Dixon-based MR imaging with a rapid low-resolution breath-hold sequence, which is a technique used for MR-based attenuation correction (AC) for MR/positron emission tomography (PET), was evaluated for anatomical correlation of PET-positive lesions on a 3T clinical scanner compared to low-dose CT. This technique is also used in a recently installed fully integrated whole-body MR/PET system.

Methods

Thirty-five patients routinely scheduled for oncological staging underwent ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT and a 2-point Dixon 3-D volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination (VIBE) T1-weighted MR sequence on the same day. Two PET data sets reconstructed using attenuation maps from low-dose CT (PET_{AC_CT}) or simulated MR-based segmentation (PET_{AC_MR}) were evaluated for focal PET-positive lesions. The certainty for the correlation with anatomical structures was judged in the low-dose CT and Dixon-based MRI on a 4-point scale (0?C3). In addition, the standardized uptake values (SUVs) for PET_{AC_CT} and PET_{AC_MR} were compared.

Results

Statistically, no significant difference could be found concerning anatomical localization for all 81 PET-positive lesions in low-dose CT compared to Dixon-based MR (mean 2.51?±?0.85 and 2.37?±?0.87, respectively; p?=?0.1909). CT tended to be superior for small lymph nodes, bone metastases and pulmonary nodules, while Dixon-based MR proved advantageous for soft tissue pathologies like head/neck tumours and liver metastases. For the PET_{AC_CT}- and PET_{AC_MR}-based SUVs (mean 6.36?±?4.47 and 6.31?±?4.52, respectively) a nearly complete concordance with a highly significant correlation was found (r?=?0.9975, p?Conclusion Dixon-based MR imaging for MR AC allows for anatomical allocation of PET-positive lesions similar to low-dose CT in conventional PET/CT. Thus, this approach appears to be useful for future MR/PET for body regions not fully covered by diagnostic MRI due to potential time constraints.     

Diagnostic performance of 18F-fluorothymidine PET/CT for primary colorectal cancer and its lymph node metastasis: comparison with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT

Purpose

To examine the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-fluorothymidine (FLT) PET/CT in primary and metastatic lymph node colorectal cancer foci in comparison with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT.

Methods

The study population comprised 28 patients with 30 newly diagnosed colorectal cancers who underwent surgical resection of the primary lesion and regional lymph nodes after both FLT and FDG PET/CT. The associations between SUVmax levels and pathological factors were evaluated using the Mann-Whitney U or Kruskal-Wallis test. Differences in diagnostic indexes for detecting nodal metastasis between the two tracers were estimated using the McNemar exact or χ ² test.

Results

All 30 primary cancers (43.0?±?20.0 mm, range 14 – 85 mm) were visualized by both tracers, but none of the FLT SUVmax values exceeded the FDG SUVmax values in any of the primary cancers (6.6?±?2.4 vs. 13.6?±?5.8, p?<?0.001). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for detecting nodal metastasis were 41 % (15/37), 98.8 % (493/499) and 94.8 % (508/536) for FDG PET/CT, and 32 % (12/37), 98.8 % (493/499) and 94.2 % (505/536) for FLT PET/CT, respectively. The sensitivity (p?=?0.45), specificity (p?=?0.68) and accuracy (p?=?0.58) were not different between the tracers. Nodal uptake of FLT and FDG was discordant in 7 (19 %) of 37 metastatic nodes. There were ten concordant true-positive nodes of which six showed higher FDG SUVmax and four showed higher FLT SUVmax, but the difference between FDG and FLT SUVmax was not significant (5.56?±?3.55 and 3.62?±?1.45, respectively; p?=?0.22).

Conclusion

FLT has the same potential as FDG in PET/CT for the diagnosis of primary and nodal foci of colorectal cancer despite significantly lower FLT uptake in primary foci.     

Discrimination and anatomical mapping of PET-positive lesions: comparison of CT attenuation-corrected PET images with coregistered MR and CT images in the abdomen

Purpose

PET/MR has the potential to become a powerful tool in clinical oncological imaging. The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the performance of a single T1-weighted (T1w) fat-suppressed unenhanced MR pulse sequence of the abdomen in comparison with unenhanced low-dose CT images to characterize PET-positive lesions.

Methods

A total of 100 oncological patients underwent sequential whole-body ¹⁸F-FDG PET with CT-based attenuation correction (AC), 40?mAs low-dose CT and two-point Dixon-based T1w 3D MRI of the abdomen in a trimodality PET/CT-MR system. PET-positive lesions were assessed by CT and MRI with regard to their anatomical location, conspicuity and additional relevant information for characterization.

Results

From among 66 patients with at least one PET-positive lesion, 147 lesions were evaluated. No significant difference between MRI and CT was found regarding anatomical lesion localization. The MR pulse sequence used performed significantly better than CT regarding conspicuity of liver lesions (p?<?0.001, Wilcoxon signed ranks test), whereas no difference was noted for extrahepatic lesions. For overall lesion characterization, MRI was considered superior to CT in 40?% of lesions, equal to CT in 49?%, and inferior to CT in 11?%.

Conclusion

Fast Dixon-based T1w MRI outperformed low-dose CT in terms of conspicuity and characterization of PET-positive liver lesions and performed similarly in extrahepatic tumour manifestations. Hence, under the assumption that the technical issue of MR AC for whole-body PET examinations is solved, in abdominal PET/MR imaging the replacement of low-dose CT by a single Dixon-based MR pulse sequence for anatomical lesion correlation appears to be valid and robust.     

Diagnostic value of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) compared to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging

Purpose

The aim of the study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic value of whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and FDG PET/CT for breast cancer (BC) staging.

Methods

Twenty BC patients underwent whole-body FDG PET/CT and 1.5-T DWI. Lesions with qualitatively elevated signal intensity on DW images (b?=?800 s/mm²) were rated as suspicious for tumour and mapped to individual lesions and different compartments (overall 552 lesions). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value was determined for quantitative evaluation. Histopathology, MRI findings, bone scan findings, concordant findings between FDG PET/CT and DWI, CT follow-up scans and plausibility served as the standards of reference defining malignancy.

Results

According to the standards of reference, breasts harboured malignancy in 11, regional lymph nodes in 4, M1 lymph nodes in 3, bone in 7, lung in 2, liver in 3 and other tissues in 3 patients. On a compartment basis, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for the detection of malignancies were 94, 99, 98, 97 and 98% for FDG PET/CT and 91, 72, 76, 50 and 96% for DWI, respectively. Of the lesions seen on DWI only, 348 (82%) turned out to be false-positive compared to 23 (11%) on FDG PET/CT. The average lesion ADC was 820?±?300 with true-positive lesions having 929?±?252 vs 713?±?305 in false-positive lesions (p?<?0.0001).

Conclusion

Based on these initial data DWI seems to be a sensitive but unspecific modality for the detection of locoregional or metastatic BC disease. There was no possibility to quantitatively distinguish lesions using ADC. DWI alone may not be recommended as a whole-body staging alternative to FDG PET(/CT). Further studies are necessary addressing the question of whether full-body MRI including DWI may become an alternative to FDG PET/CT for whole-body breast cancer staging.