Ligation of huge spontaneous porto-systemic collaterals to avoid portal inflow steal in adult living donor liver transplantation: A case-report

IntroductionIn adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), maintenance of adequate portal inflow is essential for the graft regeneration. Portal inflow steal (PFS) may occur due to presence of huge spontaneous porto-systemic collaterals. A surgical procedure to increase the portal inflow is rarely necessary in adult LDLT.PresentationA 52 years male patient with end-stage liver disease due to chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Preoperative portography showed marked attenuated portal vein and its two main branches, patent tortuous splenic vein, multiple splenic hilar collaterals, and large lieno-renal collateral. He received a right hemi-liver graft from his nephew. Exploration revealed markedly cirrhotic liver, moderate splenomegaly with multiple collaterals and large lieno-renal collateral. Upon dissection of the hepato-duodenal ligament, a well-developed portal vein could be identified with a small mural thrombus.The recipient portal vein stump was anastomosed, in end to end fashion, to the graft portal vein. Doppler US showed reduced portal vein flow, so ligation of the huge lieno-renal collateral that allows steal of the portal inflow. After ligation of the lieno-renal collateral, improvement of the portal vein flow was observed in Doppler US.DiscussionThere is no accepted algorithm for managing spontaneous lieno-renal shunts before, during, or after liver transplantation, and evidence for efficacy of treatments remains limited. We report a case of surgical interruption of spontaneous huge porto-systemic collateral to prevent PFS during adult LDLT.ConclusionComplete interruption of large collateral vessels might be needed as a part of adult LDLT procedure to avoid devastating postoperative PFS.     

Ligation of Left Renal Vein as a Salvage Procedure for Splenorenal Shunt After Living Donor Liver Transplantation: A Case Report

We describe a case of recovered portal flow by ligation of the left renal vein (LRV) as a salvage procedure for a spontaneous splenorenal shunt (SRS) occurring the next day after right liver living donor transplantation (LDLT). Doppler ultrasonography showed normal graft portal venous flow immediately after LDLT, but nearly total diversion of portal flow into the existing splenorenal shunt was observed on the next day. Portal flow normalized after ligation of the LRV by relaparotomy. The patient recovered fully without complication and was discharged on the 17th postoperative day. He remains well at 14 months after the operation, returning to his previous occupation. This case was neither associated with acute rejection nor with small-for-size graft, which may increase intrahepatic vascular resistance, causing portal flow steal through shunts. Even though patients with preoperative SRS show normal portal flow immediately after transplantation, close monitoring is necessary for a possible decrease or loss of portal flow. If portal flow becomes insufficient, ligation of LRV as a salvage procedure is an important option that can be considered even after transplantation.     

Living-related liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis for a patient with large spontaneous splenorenal collateral

BACKGROUND: A large splenorenal collateral must be interrupted during liver transplantation to secure adequate portal perfusion. However, this process increases the complexity of the operative procedure and may cause hazardous bleeding. Recently, renoportal anastomosis in portal reconstruction was reported in cadaveric liver transplantation for patients with surgically created splenorenal shunts. We used this technique in a living-related liver transplantation. METHODS: A 29-year-old female with a large spontaneous splenorenal collateral and a portal venous thrombus underwent a living-related liver transplantation. At surgery, the left renal vein was divided and the distal stump was anastomosed to the portal vein of the graft without interrupting collaterals. RESULTS: Adequate portal venous blood flow was maintained throughout the postoperative course. The patient was discharged 9 weeks after transplantation and remains well. CONCLUSION: The renoportal anastomosis could be used for portal reconstruction in living-related liver transplantation for patients with a large splenorenal collateral. It provides adequate portal perfusion without interrupting collateral circulation.     

The Use of Recipient Superficial Femoral Vein as a Venous Graft for Portal Vein Reconstruction in Right Lobe Living Donor Liver Transplantation

In living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), portal vein thrombosis (PVT) in the recipient is frequently regarded as a contraindication. To reconstruct the PV of a right-lobe liver graft (RLG) using an interposition or jump graft from the splenomesenteric junction, various vein grafts and technical modifications have been introduced. The internal jugular, external iliac, or great saphenous veins have been utilized in such reconstructive procedures. However, the superficial femoral vein (SFV) is preferable to the autologous vein grafts in terms of caliber, wall thickness, and length. We employed the recipient SFV to reconstruct PVT among 40 adult LDLT using RLG. Thirty-three were reconstructed by single end-to-end anastomosis with the right or left recipient PV. Three patients were transplanted with a RLG using 2 separated PVs reconstructed by double anastomoses with both the right and left PVs of the recipient. The remaining 4 patients required venous grafting for portal reconstruction. We used the recipient SFV as an interposition or jump graft from the splenomesenteric junction to the graft PV. There were 2 cases of anastomotic PV stenosis; 1 in portal reconstruction without a venous graft and the other with a SFV graft. Both were treated successfully by balloon angioplasty. The recipient SFV is an excellent size match for the PV reconstruction as a long interposition or jump conduit when the venous system from the deceased donor is not available. The indication for LDLT in patients with complete PVT should be carefully decided before transplantation in terms of portal reconstruction.     

Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Congenital Absence of the Portal Vein

The congenital absence of the portal vein (CAPV) is a rare venous malformation in which mesenteric venous blood drains directly into the systemic circulation. Liver transplantation (OLT) may be indicated for patients with symptomatic CAPV refractory to medical treatment, especially due to hyperammonemia, portosystemic encephalopathy, hepatopulmonary syndrome, or hepatic tumors. Because portal hypertension and collateral circulation do not occur with CAPV, significant splanchnic congestion may occur when the portocaval shunt is totally clamped during portal vein (PV) reconstruction in OLT. This phenomenon results in severe bowel edema and hemodynamic instability, which negatively impact the patient's condition and postoperative recovery. We have successfully reconstructed the PV in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using a venous interposition graft, which was anastomosed end-to-side to the portocaval shunt by a partial side-clamp, using a patent round ligament of the liver, which was anastomosed end-to-end to the graft PV with preservation of both the portal and caval blood flows. Owing to the differences in anatomy among patients, at LDLT for CAPV liver transplant surgeons should seek to preserve both portal and caval blood flows.     

Branching Patterns and Drainage Territories of the Middle Hepatic Vein in Computer-Simulated Right Living-Donor Hepatectomies

Full right hepatic grafts are most frequently used for adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). One of the major problems is venous drainage of segments 5 and 8. Thus, this study was designed to provide information on venous drainage of right liver lobes for operation-planning. Fifty-six CT data sets from routine clinical imaging were evaluated retrospectively using a liver operation-planning system. We defined and analyzed venous drainage segments and the impact of anatomic variations of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) on venous outflow from segments 5 and 8. MHV variations led to significant shifts of segment 5 drainage between the middle and right hepatic vein. In cases with the most frequent MHV branching pattern (n = 33), a virtual hepatectomy closely right to the MHV intersected drainage vessels that provided drainage for 30% of the potential graft, not taking into account potential veno-venous shunts. In individuals with inferior MHV branches that extend far into segments 5 and 6 (n = 10), the overall graft volume at risk of impaired venous drainage increased by 5% (p < 0.001). If this is confirmed in clinical trials and correlated with intraoperative findings, the use of liver operation-planning systems would be beneficial to improve overall outcome after right lobe LDLT.     

Optimal portal venous circulation for liver graft function after living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown poor outcome after living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) as a result of excessive portal venous pressure (PVP), excessive portal venous flow (PVF), or inadequate PVF. We investigated optimal portal venous circulation for liver graft function after LDLT in adult recipients retrospectively. METHODS: Between June 2003 and November 2004, 28 adult patients underwent LDLT in our institution. We modulated PVP under 20 mmHg in these 28 cases by performing a splenectomy (n=4) or splenorenal shunt (n=1). The PVF and PVP were measured at the end of the operation. Compliance was calculated by dividing PVF by PVP. RESULTS: PVF and compliance showed a significant inverse correlation with peak billirubin levels after LDLT (r = -0.63: r=-0.60, P<0.01), and with peak international normalized ratio after LDLT (r=-0.41: r=-0.51, P<0.05). Compliance was higher in right-lobe graft with middle hepatic vein cases (148+/-27 ml/min/mmHg), and lower in left-lobe graft cases (119+/-50 ml/min/mmHg). CONCLUSIONS: Liver graft function was better when PVF and graft compliance were higher and PVP was maintained under 20 mmHg.     

Explanted portal vein grafts for middle hepatic vein tributaries in living-donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: The availability of a venous graft is limited in the setting of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), and the management of the middle hepatic vein middle hepatic vein tributaries in right lobe LDLT still remains controversial. METHODS: Twenty-three right lobe LDLT grafts, with the reconstruction of middle hepatic vein tributaries using the explanted portal veins from the explanted livers, were evaluated for the patency, postLDLT liver function tests, and graft survival. RESULTS: The methods of outflow reconstruction were classified into three types: the interposition of the graft to the middle/left hepatic vein (n=12), to the vena cava (n=9), and to the vena cava as a co-orifice with the graft right hepatic vein (n=2). The 1- and 3-year patency rates were 76.7% and 76.7% respectively, with the graft occlusion in five cases. The occluded cases (n=5) had significantly higher aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase levels as compared with those of patent cases (n=18) at 4 weeks after transplantation (P<0.01). However, there was no significant difference in the total bilirubin and prothrombin time in either group during the observation periods. The 1- and 3-year graft survival rates were 91.1% and 91.1%, respectively. In addition, there was no graft loss due to occlusion. CONCLUSION: The use of the recipient's explanted full-length hilar portal vein for the reconstruction of the middle hepatic vein tributaries is thus considered to be a feasible and valuable strategy in the setting of a right lobe LDLT, where appropriate vascular grafts are not always available.     

How to handle a huge portosystemic shunt in adult living donor liver transplantation with a small-for-size graft: Report of a case

Little attention has been paid to a ligation of the spontaneous portosystemic shunt in adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). A 33-year-old Japanese man with cryptogenic liver cirrhosis accompanied by a huge splenorenal shunt underwent LDLT. Acute cellular rejection produced “to and fro” portal venous flow on postoperative day (POD) 10. Steroid bolus therapy reversed the rejection, but the recovery of the portal venous flow was incomplete and the recipient subsequently started to have episodes of encephalopathy. Angiography showed portal hypoperfusion and portal flow steal via a huge splenorenal shunt. The patient underwent a shunt occlusion on POD 58. Portography showed marked improvement of the portal hypoperfusion. The encephalopathy thereafter dramatically reversed and the patient was discharged with no complications related to shunt ligation on POD 110. This case suggested that a ligation of a huge portosystemic shunt should therefore be considered at the time of transplantation, even when a relatively small graft is implanted.     

Usefulness of three-dimensional computed tomography in a living-donor extended right lobe liver transplantation

Although living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) of right lobe graft is becoming a popular option for adult patients, management of venous outflow remains controversial. We report a successful extended-right lobe liver transplantation using a recipient's left portal vein as a graft from the middle hepatic vein. Preoperative three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT) of the donor revealed a small right hepatic vein (RHV) without inferior RHV and a large middle hepatic vein (MHV) draining segments 5 and 8. During the donor operation, right lobe graft was harvested with the MHV, preserving the drainage vein from segment 4. The donor recovered uneventfully except for mild transient hyperbilirubinemia. The recipient's condition rapidly improved, and was discharged from hospital 49 days postoperation. A 3D-CT after LDLT also clearly revealed successful vascular anastomosis. Preoperative and postoperative 3D-CT was useful for determination of the vascular anatomy and the decision about the line of transection in the donor hepatectomy, as well as for evaluation of the vascular anastomoses after transplantation. (Liver Transpl 2002;8:1076-1079.)     

Transumbilical portal venous catheterization: a useful adjunct in left lobe living donor liver transplantation

To improve the processes used for perfusion of the explanted graft and measuring the portal venous pressure (PVP) in adult living donor transplantation (LDLT), we performed transumbilical portal venous catheterization (TPVC) to reopen the umbilical vein and insert the catheter for seven adult patients undergoing left lobe LDLT. There were no major complications as a result of this procedure. This procedure prior to implanting the graft was derived from our experience and is a classic diagnostic technique used during liver surgery. It is a simple and effective procedure for perfusion and washout of the graft and for the safe monitoring of the intraoperative PVP. We hope that this technique for left lobe LDLT will be helpful to others using postoperative PVP monitoring, administration of therapeutic drugs through the portal vein, and temporal portal decompression by preparation of extracorporeal shunting in patients with a small‐for‐size graft.     

Living Donor Liver Transplantation with Left Liver Graft

Small-for-size syndrome in LDLT is associated with graft exposure to excessive portal perfusion. Prevention of graft overperfusion in LDLT can be achieved through intraoperative modulation of portal graft inflow. We report a successful LDLT utilising the left lobe with a GV/SLV of only 20%. A 43 year-old patient underwent to LDLT at our institution. During the anhepatic phase a porto-systemic shunt utilizing an interposition vein graft anastomosed between the right portal branch and the right hepatic vein was performed. After graft reperfusion splenectomy was also performed. Portal vein pressure, portal vein flow and hepatic artery flow were recorded. A decrease of portal vein pressure and flow was achieved, and the shunt was left in place. The recipient post-operative course was characterized by good graft function. Small-for-size syndrome by graft overperfusion can be successfully prevented by utilizing inflow modulation of the transplanted graft. This strategy can permit the use of left lobe in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.     

Evaluation of hepatic venous congestion: proposed indication criteria for hepatic vein reconstruction

OBJECTIVE: To establish criteria for venous reconstruction of middle hepatic vein (MHV) tributaries of the right liver graft in adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: In adult LDLT using the right hemiliver, the MHV is usually separated from the graft, which results in potential venous congestion in the major part of the right paramedian sector (segments 5 and 8). It is controversial whether MHV tributaries should be reconstructed. METHODS: Thirty-nine donors for LDLT were enrolled in the study. After liver transection, temporary arterial clamping was carried out to visualize congestion in the right paramedian sector by occlusion of MHV tributaries. Intra- and postoperative (on postoperative days 3 and 7) Doppler ultrasonography was performed to check the hepatic venous and portal flow in the veno-occlusive area. RESULTS: In 29 of 37 donors (78%), the liver surface of the veno-occlusive area was discolored with temporary arterial clamping. The discolored area was calculated to represent approximately two thirds of the right paramedian sector on computed tomography volumetry. All of the cases with discoloration exhibited absent venous flow and regurgitated portal flow in the discolored area by intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography. These ultrasonographic findings resolved by postoperative day 7 in 6 of 14 cases (43%). CONCLUSIONS: The state of venous congestion in the right liver graft can be correctly assessed by the temporary arterial clamping method and intraoperative Doppler ultrasonography. If the venocongestive area is demonstrated to be so large that the graft volume excluding this area is thought to be insufficient for postoperative metabolic demand, venous reconstruction is recommended.     

Living-donor liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis for patients with large spontaneous splenorenal shunts

BACKGROUND: End-stage liver disease is often accompanied by large spontaneous splenorenal shunts and thrombosed portal vein. Renoportal anastomosis for spontaneous splenorenal shunts in living-donor liver transplantations is one of the solutions for the treatment of these patients. However, the long-term outcome, portal venous hemodynamics after liver transplantation, and the effects of altering the renal venous drainage remained unknown. METHODS: We performed three living-donor liver transplantations with renoportal anastomosis for the treatment of spontaneous splenorenal shunts between 1999 and 2004. We then evaluated the outcome of this procedure using short- and long-term follow-ups in which the postoperative graft function, renal function, radiological images and portal hemodynamics were examined. RESULTS: All three patients who underwent a living-donor liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis are alive with normal graft function and a patent renoportal anastomosis. The portal hemodynamics were similar to those in conventional living-donor liver transplantation recipients, and had no harmful effect on allograft function. Left renal function returned to normal after the temporal impairment in two cases, and remained slightly impaired in one, although it was negligible clinically. CONCLUSIONS: Living-donor liver transplantation with renoportal anastomosis for the treatment of spontaneous splenorenal shunts in patients with end-stage liver disease is a life-saving and safe technique and should be discussed as a treatment option for patients with splenorenal shunts.     

Successful super-small-for-size graft liver transplantation by decompression of portal hypertension via splenectomy and construction of a mesocaval shunt: a case report

We performed a successful super-small-for-size graft liver transplantation by decompressing portal hypertension via splenectomy and a mesocaval shunt. A 46-year-old woman with Child-Pugh class C liver cirrhosis associated with Wilson's disease underwent a living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). The donor had an anomalous portal vein, hepatic vein, and bile duct, so we had to use the right lateral segment for the graft. Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) volumetry showed the volume of this area to be 433 mL; graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) was 0.72; and graft-to-standard liver volume (GV/SLV) was 39.0%. However, the real volume of the resected right lateral segment was 281 g; GRWR was 0.47; and GV/SLV was 25.3%--a super-small-for-size graft. After implantation, congestion of the small graft was severe due to excessive portal hypertension. Therefore, we tried decompressing the portal vein. First, we performed splenectomy which reduced the portal pressure which remained excessive. Second, a mesocaval shunt was constructed decreasing the portal pressure from 38 to 30 cm H2O. Additionally, we initiated continuous portal injection of prostaglandin E1. The postoperative course was not smooth, but the general status slowly recovered. Over 25 cm H2O of portal hypertension was observed until postoperative day 21 when it improved. At last, the recipient was discharged on postoperative day 156. Accurate preoperative CT volumetry is important to obtain sufficient graft volume. Our case may be one of the smallest-for-size grafts that was successfully transplanted. Management of excessive portal hypertension is important for LDLT, especially using a small-for-size graft. Splenectomy and construction of a mesocaval shunt may be useful strategies to decompress the portal vein.     

Evaluation of graft stiffness using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging after living donor liver transplantation

Acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging is an ultrasound‐based modality to evaluate tissue stiffness using short‐duration acoustic pulses in the region of interest. Virtual touch tissue quantification (VTTQ), which is an implementation of ARFI, allows quantitative assessment of tissue stiffness. Twenty recipients who underwent living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for chronic liver diseases were enrolled. Graft types included left lobes with the middle hepatic vein and caudate lobes (n = 11), right lobes (n = 7), and right posterior segments (n = 2). They underwent measurement of graft VTTQ during the early post‐LDLT period. The VTTQ value level rose after LDLT, reaching a maximum level on postoperative day 4. There were no significant differences in the VTTQ values between the left and right lobe graft types. Significant correlations were observed between the postoperative maximum value of VTTQ and graft volume‐to‐recipient standard liver volume ratio, portal venous flow to graft volume ratio, and post‐LDLT portal venous pressure. The postoperative maximum serum alanine aminotransferase level and ascites fluid production were also significantly correlated with VTTQ. ARFI may be a useful diagnostic tool for the noninvasive and quantitative evaluation of the severity of graft dysfunction after LDLT.     

The outcome of living donor liver transplantation with prior spontaneous large portasystemic shunts.

We investigated the outcome of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) with prior spontaneous large portasystemic shunts. Thirty-three patients of 155 patients (21.2%) undergoing LDLT had spontaneous large portasystemic shunts. Portal venous hemodynamics, surgical procedures for shunts, and morbidity and mortality rates were investigated in three types of shunts: splenorenal shunt (SRS group; n = 11), shunt derived from coronary vein (CVS group; n = 6) and umbilical vein shunt (UVS group; n = 15). The two groups of patients (SRS/CVS) received prophylactic surgical repair of shunts during LDLT except for one patient in the SRS group. The flow direction of main portal vein and grade of steal of superior mesenteric vein flow by shunt were significantly different among three groups. No significant differences were observed among three groups in operative parameters, hospitalization and morbidity except for postoperative portal complication. There was no significant difference in the actuarial survival rate among three groups of SRS, CVS and UVS (81.8% vs. 83.3% vs. 86.6% at 1 year respectively). In the SRS group, two patients had postoperative steal of graft portal venous flow by residual SRS that needed further treatment. The outcome of LDLT with prior spontaneous large portasystemic shunts is satisfactory, despite the complexity of the transplant procedures.     

Techniques of reconstruction of hepatic veins in living-donor liver transplantation, especially for right hepatic vein and major short hepatic veins of right-lobe graft

Living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is now widely accepted as a therapeutic option for adult patients with acute and chronic end-stage liver disease. In the early period, the left lobe was the major liver graft used in adult LDLT to ensure donor safety, especially in Eastern countries. However, the frequent extremes of graft-size insufficiency in left-lobe LDLT represented a greater risk of small-for-size graft syndrome in the recipient, which has focused attention on transplantation of the right lobe from a living donor. The major concern of right-lobe LDLT has focused on its safety for the donor and the necessity for including the middle hepatic vein (MHV) in the graft to avoid congestion of the right anterior segment. The MHV carries out important venous drainage for the right anterior segment and is essential for perfect graft function. The decision of whether to take the MHV with the liver graft (extended right lobe graft) or whether to retain it in the donor, with reconstruction of the MHV tributaries in the liver graft (modified right lobe graft) has been extensively discussed in numerous studies. However, adequate right hepatic vein and major short hepatic vein (middle and inferior right hepatic vein [RHV]) drainage of the liver graft is perhaps equally important as MHV outflow drainage for the integrity of right-lobe graft function. Herein, the author describes various techniques of venoplasty of the right hepatic vein (RHV) and the major short hepatic veins to obviate venous outflow obstruction in these veins.     

Right liver adult-to-adult live donor liver transplantation in Hong Kong

The extension of live donor liver transplantation (LDLT) from children to adults went in parallel with the shift from using the left-liver graft to the right. Donor right hepatectomy, being a more major procedure, only intensifies the ethical controversy, which is central to LDLT. Since its debut in 1996, right-liver adult-to-adult LDLT has gone through a number of technical innovations and refinements based on constant review of outcomes and study of the relevant pathophysiology. To achieve unimpeded graft venous outflow, the middle hepatic vein was universally included and underwent venoplasty with the right hepatic vein before anastomosis with the recipient inferior vena cava. Donor safety was never compromised and was acquired by preservation of segment 4b hepatic vein in the remnant left lobe. Venovenous bypass, which was associated with adverse outcomes, is no longer used. Early restoration of the circulation through the inferior vena cava was made possible by release of the clamps to the latter before portal vein anastomosis. Through judicious use of the procedure, which was executed with a high degree of precision, using right-liver grafts more than 35% of the estimated liver mass, a 1-year recipient survival of more than 90% is achievable in our series.     

A Single-Center Experience in Portal Flow Augmentation in Liver Transplantation With Prior Large Spontaneous Splenorenal Shunt

Large portosystemic shunts may cause portal steal syndrome in liver transplantation (LT). Because of the possible devastating consequences of the syndrome, the authors recommend perioperative management of these large shunts. Fourteen adult recipients who underwent portal flow augmentation, including left renal vein ligation (LRVL), renoportal anastomosis (RPA), shunt ligation (SL), and splenic vein ligation (SVL) for large spontaneous splenorenal shunt (SSRS), are included in this study, and the results were analyzed. A total of 13 patients had a large SSRS, and in 1 patient, the large shunt was placed between the superior mesenteric vein and the right renal vein. LDLT was performed in 13 patients. LRVL (n = 5), SVL (n = 6), RPA (n = 2), SL (n = 1) were performed to the patients as graft inflow augmentation. The graft-recipient weight ratios (GRWR) were less than 0.8% in 5 patients (35.7%): 2 had LRVL, and 3 had SVL. Small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) occurred only in these 2 patients with LRVL (GRWR ≤0.8%) and, splenic artery ligation was performed for graft inflow modulation. No mortality or serious complications were reported during follow-up. We consider that in patients with large SSRS and small-for-size grafts, SVL can be performed safely and with satisfactory outcomes.