Endoscopic management of a large choledochocele associated with choledocholithiasis

Choledochocele or type III choledochal cyst is a very rare lesion, defined as a cystic dilatation of the distal common bile duct protruding into the duodenal lumen. Abdominal pain, biliary disorders, and acute pancreatitis are frequently observed but malignant degeneration is rare. A 70-year-old man had a history of epigastralgia associated with abnormal liver function tests suggesting gallstones. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intraoperative cholangiography showed a 40-mm-diameter choledochocele associated with choledocholithiasis. A transcystic drain was placed after cholecystectomy had been completed. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography confirmed the diagnosis and a 45-mm-long endoscopic sphincterotomy successfully treated both lesions as confirmed by a transcystic cholangiogram showing a thin-walled common bile duct with no residual stones. This case illustrates that the diagnosis of choledochocele remains difficult in clinical practice and confirms that endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is the best available diagnostic tool. Coexistent choledocholithiasis is observed in about 20% of choledochocele. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is feasible and effectively treats both lesions even in larger choledochoceles.     

Non-invasive assessment of choledocholithiasis in patients with gallstones and abnormal liver function

AIM:To find a non-invasive strategy for detecting choledocholithiasis before cholecystectomy,with an acceptable negative rate of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.METHODS:All patients with symptomatic gallstones were included in the study.Patients with abnormal liver functions and common bile duct abnormalities on ultrasound were referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.Patients with normal ultrasoundwere referred to magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.All those who had a negative magnetic resonance or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography.RESULTS:Seventy-eight point five percent of patients had laparoscopic cholecystectomy directly with no further investigations.Twenty-one point five percent had abnormal liver function tests,of which 52.8%had normal ultrasound results.This strategy avoided unnecessary magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in 47.2%of patients with abnormal liver function tests with a negative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography rate of 10%.It also avoided un-necessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in 35.2%of patients with abnormal liver function.CONCLUSION:This strategy reduces the cost of the routine use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography,in the diagnosis and treatment of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Pre-operative endoscopic ultrasonography can optimise the management of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests as the sole risk factor for choledocholithiasis: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Pre-operative endosonography has been proposed as a cost-effective procedure in the management of patients who undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy having an intermediate risk of common bile duct stones. We prospectively evaluated the impact of pre-operative endosonography on the management of patients facing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests as the sole risk factor for choledocolithiasis. METHODS: Among 587 consecutive patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 47 (8%) patients having one or more abnormal liver function tests but a normal appearance of common bile duct at abdominal ultrasound, underwent pre-operative endosonography. In patients with endosonography-detected common bile duct stones, a pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was performed, or an intra-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was scheduled. In all endosonography-negative patients, an intra-operative trans-cystic cholangiography was performed. RESULTS: Endosonography detected common bile duct stones in nine patients (19%) but only in five of them stones were radiologically confirmed (PPV 0.55). Endosonography-detected stones were confirmed in four of four (100%) patients in whom cholangiography was performed within 1 week, but only in one of five (20%) patients in whom radiology was further delayed (P < 0.05). In three of four cases (75%), stones detected at endosonography but not confirmed at X-rays, were smaller than 2.0 mm. Among 38 patients with negative endosonography, common bile duct stones were found in two patients (NPV 0.95), whereas unplanned endoscopic stone extraction was needed only in one patient (NPV 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Pre-operative endosonography can spare unnecessary pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as well as inappropriate scheduling of intra-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests. To maximise the impact of endosonography on the management of these patients, the procedure should be performed immediately before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Diagnosis of common bile duct calculi with intraductal ultrasonography during endoscopic biliary cannulation

BACKGROUND: Choledocholithiasis can be difficult to diagnose, even with direct cholangiography. We examined the role of biliary intraductal ultrasonography in detecting common bile duct stones that had been overlooked during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. METHODS: Eighty consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for suspected choledocholithiasis with negative results were evaluated with intraductal ultrasonography (20 MHz) for the presence of biliary concrements. The diagnostic criterion for stones was a strong-echo structure with acoustic shadowing. Materials of low amplitude echoes without acoustic shadowing were considered sludge. RESULTS: Intrabile duct scanning was successful in all patients. Of the 80 patients, 20 (25%) had ultrasonic evidence of common bile duct stones. The stones measured 5 mm or less on ultrasound and their presence was confirmed macroscopically during endoscopic (17 patients) or laparoscopic (three patients) bile duct clearance. Another 37 patients (46%) had biliary sludge alone and have been followed up uneventfully. CONCLUSIONS: Biliary intraductal ultrasonography may become a useful adjunct to establish the diagnosis of occult bile duct concrements and a guide to appropriate therapeutic selection during endoscopic biliary cannulation.     

Gallensteine

In Germany, 15–20% of individuals develop gallstones, and more than 190,000 cholecystectomies are performed for symptomatic stones annually. Overall, 90% of gallstones are cholesterol stones, which are due to increased hepatic cholesterol secretion and gallbladder hypomotility. Cholesterol hypersecretion is attributed to exogenous risk factors, such as a hypercaloric carbohydrate-rich diet and physical inactivity, as well as to lithogenic genes, such as common gene variants of the hepatic cholesterol transporter ABCG5/G8. Of stone carriers, 1–3% per year develop symptoms (biliary colic), and the rate of complications (cholecystitis, cholangitis, pancreatitis) ranges from 0.1% to 0.3% per year. Today laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents the standard of care for most symptomatic stones with and without complications because it leads to shorter hospital stays and recovery times than open cholecystectomy but has similar complication rates. The recently updated German S3 guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of gallstones recommends preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and stone extraction in cases of simultaneous bile duct and gallbladder stones; if the probability of bile duct stones is moderate, endoscopic ultrasound – or magnetic resonance cholangiography – should precede cholecystectomy.     

Catheter probe extraductal EUS reliably detects distal common bile duct abnormalities

BACKGROUND: This prospective study evaluated whether extraductal catheter probe EUS as an adjunct to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography can detect or rule out choledocholithiasis and other pathologic conditions of the distal common bile duct. METHODS: A total of 119 patients referred because of suspected choledocholithiasis or other bile flow obstruction for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and papillotomy were included in this prospective study. Extraductal EUS of the distal common bile duct with a radial-scanning catheter probe was followed immediately by endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and papillotomy by a second examiner who was blinded to the EUS findings. Extraductal EUS and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography findings were compared. RESULTS: Extraductal EUS detected 33/34 bile duct stones and all papillary adenomas (16 patients). In 8/34 patients, stones were missed on cholangiography but were seen after papillotomy and stone extraction. Extraductal EUS missed 10 peripheral lesions, one pancreatic tumor, and two distal bile duct stenoses. Overall, the sensitivity of EDUS was 78% and specificity was 98%. CONCLUSIONS: Extraductal EUS accurately detects abnormalities involving the distal common bile duct, especially small stones. The use of catheter probe EUS imaging during interventional endoscopy can help to avoid unnecessary papillotomy and can influence therapeutic strategy.     

Role of Preoperative Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiography in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Abstract: An endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) was performed in 303 patients before laparoscopic cholecystectory. The ERC was successful in 275 patients (90.8%). Common bile duct stones were diagnosed in 9 of 275 patients (3.3%). These had not been suspected on the basis of the clinical and laboratory data or ultrasonography results in 8 of them. An endoscopic papilotomy (EPT) was successful in all 9 patients with choledocholithiasis before laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Anatomical variations, such as origin of the cystic duct from the right or left hepatic duct and an accessory bile duct, were detected in 6 patients (2.2%). Preoperative ERC proved useful in determining the biliary anatomy or detecting unsuspected stones. (Dig Endosc 1994; 6 : 24–27)     

Sphincterotomy in patients with gallstones, elevated LFTs and a normal CBD on ERCP

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To determine whether an endoscopic sphincterotomy affects outcome in patients with symptomatic gallstones, elevated liver function tests and a normal common bile duct on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram. METHODOLOGY: A total of 163 patients with symptomatic gallstones and elevated liver function tests, and found to have a normal common bile duct on endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram were included in the study. Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed in 78 (47.8%) patients, while 85 (52.1%) patients did not have an endoscopic sphincterotomy. The two groups were compared for detection of small unseen common bile duct stones/debris, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complications, and biliary complications after cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Small common bile duct stones/debris were recovered in 11/43 (25.5%) patients who had instrumentation of the common bile duct performed after endoscopic sphincterotomy. Common bile duct instrumentation was not performed in any of the patients without endoscopic sphincterotomy. No patient had any biliary complication after cholecystectomy, both in the immediate postoperative period and on a follow-up of 37.5 +/- 13.6 months (range 17-66). Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complications occurred in 8 patients who had an endoscopic sphincterotomy and in 2 without endoscopic sphincterotomy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Performing an endoscopic sphincterotomy in these patients increases the detection of small unseen common bile duct stones/debris without changing the clinical outcome after cholecystectomy. It also increases the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatogram related complication rate, and therefore may not be necessary.     

Acute suppurative obstructive cholangitis due to stones: treatment by urgent endoscopic sphincterotomy

Endoscopic sphincterotomy is an accepted treatment for retained common bile duct stones, but there is little specific information available regarding its application in acute suppurative obstructive cholangitis with sepsis due to choledocholithiasis. Thirteen patients with this condition were referred to the authors for consideration of urgent endoscopic common bile duct decompression. All had been judged to be poor surgical candidates. Pus was released from the common bile duct by sphincterotomy within 24 hours of admission in all 13. Stones were removed endoscopically in 10 patients (77%) without complications. After endoscopic stone removal, symptoms, signs, and abnormal laboratory values returned to normal rapidly; follow-up endoscopic retrograde cholangiography did not show retained stones. Three patients whose large stones precluded endoscopic removal underwent operative choledocholithotomy. Urgent endoscopic sphincterotomy offers an important alternative in the treatment of acute suppurative obstructive cholangitis secondary to choledocholithiasis.     

Biliary stones and stenoses: diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiography.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiography for detection of bile duct calculi and stenosis. METHODS: Half-Fourier single-shot rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement sequence magnetic resonance cholangiography was performed prospectively in 68 patients who were suspected of having choledocholithiasis or biliary tree stenosis. On the basis of findings at ultrasound, computed tomography, endoscopic retrograde or percutaneous cholangiography, intraoperative cholangiography or choledocoscopy and exploration, final diagnoses were normal bile ducts (n=8), choledocholithiasis (n=28), benign or malignant stenosis (n=32). RESULTS: Choledocholithiasis was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 96% and a specificity of 98%. False negative readings occurred due to stones less than two mm at in size at the distal common bile duct. A false diagnosis of choledocholithiasis (single impacted stone) by magnetic resonance cholangiography occurred in only one case for whom the final diagnosis was main bile duct adenocarcinoma, suspected on endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and confirmed at surgery. Bile duct stenosis was diagnosed with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 94%. CONCLUSIONS: With magnetic resonance cholangiography, bile duct calculi and stenosis can be diagnosed with high accuracy. It is a fast, accurate and noninvasive alternative to endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in the evaluation of biliary tract disease.     

ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY OF THE PAPILLA OF VATER: AN ANALYSIS OF 300 CASES

Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed on 300 patients with biliary and/or pancreatic disease during the period 1978–1983. The most frequent indications were choledocholithiasis after cholecystectomy (59%), choledocholithiasis without cholecystectomy (17%) and presumed motility disorders of the sphincter of Oddi (15%). In choledocholithiasis, stones passed spontaneously or were extracted from the bile duct in 147 of 164 patients (90%) in whom the outcome was determined by cholangiography immediately after stone extraction or by a second retrograde cholangiogram. In presumed motility disorders, only 51% of patients have shown sustained improvement in symptoms. Complications were uncommon (5%) but included bleeding from the margins of the incision, pancreatitis, cholangitis and an entrapped Dormia basket; no patient died. Duodenal diverticula were more frequent (p<0.005) in patients with bile duct stones after cholecystectomy (28%) than in patients in whom retrograde cholangiography did not reveal stones (9%) but the presence of diverticula did not influence the outcome of the procedure. Endoscopic sphincterotomy is a safe and effective procedure of particular relevance to elderly patients with choledocholithiasis after cholecystectomy and to high-risk patients with choledocholithiasis without cholecystectomy.     

The case for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration

The modern surgeon's approach to choledocholithiasis depends his or her view of cholangiography. During the early 1990 there was a swing away from cholangiography, which had previously been common practice. This was because of perceptions of difficulty with the technique, the time it took, and perhaps an implied increase in costs because of the time factor. There was no evidence on which to base this decision. This led to a marked upswing in the use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There were a large number of ERCPs with normal results performed prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This paper states the case for intraoperative cholangiography and common bile duct clearance at the time of cholecystectomy. It is hoped that this technique will be adopted so patients can undergo a single procedure to remove their gallstones and common bile duct stones if they exist and to decrease the incidence of normal preoperative ERCPs and the need for a second procedure postoperatively to clear stones if they are found.     

Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 100 patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: ultrasound evaluation

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of the study was to determine to what extent ultrasonography may monitor the process of sphincterotomy and its effectiveness. The study also aimed at determining the sensitivity and specificity of ultrasonography in detecting choledocholithiasis, in comparison with the results of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. METHODOLOGY: Between January 1995 and June 2001, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed on 100 patients with suspected synchronous choledocholithiasis in preparation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The main parameters evaluated in the ultrasonography image included the breadth of the common bile duct and absence or presence of concrements in bile ducts before and after sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Applied before the endoscopic operation, ultrasonography revealed choledocholithiasis in 58 patients and dilatation of the common bile duct in 95 patients. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography confirmed choledocholithiasis in 74 patients, after sphincterotomy concrements were removed in 63 persons. In 26 patients sphincterotomy was performed for stenosis of Vater's papilla. Patients with the breadth of the duct > 10 mm, were referred to a check-up examination. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, ultrasonography correctly specifies the breadth of the bile duct and properly monitors the process of endoscopic sphincterotomy, but is less accurate in determining the occurrence of choledocholithiasis, and sensitivity in the test amounted to 73%, and specificity of the examination--84.5%.     

Fortuitous discovery of common bile duct stones: results of a conservative strategy

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of fortuitously discovered stones in the common bile duct is about 5%. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate of spontaneous clearance of asymptomatic stones in the common bile duct discovered fortuitously during cholecystectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Intraoperative cholangiography was performed in all patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder stones. If a filling defect of the common bile duct was discovered, a transcystic drain was inserted. Surgical or endoscopic extraction was not proposed initially. A control cholangiogram was performed on the second postoperative day then during the sixth postoperative week. If a stone persisted at the sixth week, endoscopic extraction was undertaken. RESULTS: Cholecystectomy was performed in 124 patients with symptomatic gallstones and no signs predictive of stones in the common bile duct. A stone was found fortuitously in the common bile duct in 12 patients. The control cholangiogram was normal in two of these patients on day two (16.7%) and in six others (50%) at the six-week control. All 12 patients remained free of symptoms suggesting the presence of a stone in the common duct. Presence of the drain had no impact on quality-of-life. Endoscopic extraction was finally performed for four patients (33.3%) to remove a stone from the common bile duct. CONCLUSION: Early surgical or endoscopic extraction of stones in the common bile duct should not be undertaken systematically in asymptomatic patients. Spontaneous asymptomatic clearance of the common bile duct is observed in about half of patients.     

Imaging tests for accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis

Gallstones represent the most frequent aetiology of acute pancreatitis in many statistics all over the world, estimated between 40%-60%. Accurate diagnosis of acute biliary pancreatitis(ABP) is of outmost importance because clearance of lithiasis [gallbladder and common bile duct(CBD)] rules out recurrences. Confirmation of biliary lithiasis is done by imaging. The sensitivity of the ultrasonography(US) in the detection of gallstones is over 95% in uncomplicated cases, but in ABP, sensitivity for gallstone detection is lower, being less than 80% due to the ileus and bowel distension. Sensitivity of transabdominal ultrasonography(TUS) for choledocolithiasis varies between 50%-80%, but the specificity is high, reaching 95%. Diameter of the bile duct may be orientative for diagnosis. Endoscopic ultrasonography(EUS) seems to be a more effectivetool to diagnose ABP rather than endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography(ERCP),which should be performed only for therapeutic purposes.As the sensitivity and specificity of computerized tomography are lower as compared to state-of-the-art magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography(MRCP)or EUS,especially for small stones and small diameter of CBD,the later techniques are nowadays preferred for the evaluation of ABP patients.ERCP has the highest accuracy for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis and is used as a reference standard in many studies,especially after sphincterotomy and balloon extraction of CBD stones.Laparoscopic ultrasonography is a useful tool for the intraoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis.Routine exploration of the CBD in cases of patients scheduled for cholecystectomy after an attack of ABP was not proven useful.A significant rate of the so-called idiopathic pancreatitis is actually caused by microlithiasis and/or biliary sludge.In conclusion,the general algorithm for CBD stone detection starts with anamnesis,serum biochemistry and then TUS,followed by EUS or MRCP.In the end,bile duct microscopic analysis may be performed by bile harvested during ERCP in case of recurrent attacks of ABP and these should be followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy.     

Selective use of perioperative ERCP in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Management of common bile duct stones in the era of laparoscopic surgery is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to investigate the safety, feasibility, success rate and short-term results of the selective use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. METHODOLOGY: A prospective study comprising 300 consecutive patients with either symptomatic or complicated gallbladder stones was performed between January 1994 and November 1996. Depending on clinical, laboratory and ultrasonographic criteria, 73 patients (24.3%) underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy. The procedure was successful in 71 patients (97%) either preoperatively in 62 patients (21%) or postoperatively in 9 patients (3%). RESULTS: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was positive in 37 cases (52%), endoscopic sphincterotomy and stone extraction was performed in 35 cases and endoscopic sphincterotomy alone was performed in 2 cases for benign papillary stenosis. The overall predictive value for the presence of common bile duct stone was 52%, the predictive value for patients with jaundice, dilated common bile duct together with elevated liver enzymes was 73.3%. Complications of perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were encountered in 4 patients (5.5%) with no mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the combination of perioperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a useful approach for the management of choledochocholelithiasis.     

Prospective evaluation of early endoscopic ultrasonography for triage in suspected choledocholithiasis: Results from a large single centre series

BackgroundEndoscopic ultrasonography is accurate, safe, and cost-effective in diagnosing common bile duct stones, thus suggesting the possibility to avoid invasive endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.AimTo prospectively evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of early endoscopic ultrasonography in suspected choledocholithiasis.Patients and methodsAll consecutive patients presenting to the Emergency Department with suspicion of choledocholithiasis between January 2010 and January 2012 were evaluated and categorized as low, moderate, or high probability of choledocholithiasis, according to accepted criteria. Endoscopic endosonography was carried out within 48 h from the admission and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed soon in case of confirmed choledocholithiasis.ResultsOverall 179 patients were included: 48 (26.8%) were classified as low, 65 (36.3%) as moderate, and 66 (36.9%) as high probability of choledocholithiasis. Of the 86 patients with common bile duct stones at endoscopic endosonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography confirmed the finding in 79 (92%). By multivariate analysis only the common bile duct diameter proved an independent predictor of common bile duct stones.ConclusionsEarly endoscopic endosonography is accurate in identifying choledocholithiasis allowing immediate endoscopic treatment and significant spare of unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. This approach can be useful as a triage test to select patients not needing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, allowing, in selected cases, their early discharge.     

Single-step treatment of gallbladder and bile duct stones: a combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique

BACKGROUND: The introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has given rise to a debate as to whether endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) should be performed before or after cholecystectomy in patients with bile duct stones. METHODS: This study evaluated the efficacy of treatment of cholecystocholedocholithiasis in a single step by performing ERCP during surgery in 52 patients (35 women, 17 men; mean age 57.0 years; age range 20 to 89 years). Laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiography via the cystic duct was carried out to confirm the presence of duct stones. A soft-tipped guidewire was passed through the cystic duct and papilla into the duodenum. A papillotome was inserted endoscopically over the guidewire. Endoscopic sphincterectomy was performed and the stones removed with balloon and basket catheters. RESULTS: Endoscopic stone removal was successful in 94% of cases without complications related to ERCP or surgery. Although operative time was lengthened by about 20 minutes, the hospital stay was as short and equal to that for simple laparoscopic cholecystectomy (3 days on average). CONCLUSIONS: The single-step combined endoscopic-laparoscopic technique is safe and effective for treatment of patients with gallbladder and bile duct stones.     

Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis

Background: Choledocholithiasis is a major source of morbidity among patients undergoing cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstones. There is no consensus on the best approach to diagnosing bile duct stones. We compared the safety, accuracy, diagnostic yield, and cost of EUS- and ERCP-based approaches. Methods: Sixty-four consecutive pre- and post-cholecystectomy patients referred for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for suspected choledocholithiasis were prospectively evaluated in a blinded fashion. All were stratified into risk groups using predefined criteria. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and ERCP were sequentially performed by two endoscopists. Results: The success rates of EUS and ERCP were 98% and 94%, respectively. The accuracy of EUS for diagnosing choledocholithiasis was 94%. EUS provided an additional or alternative diagnosis to bile duct stones in 21% of patients. The complication rate of EUS was significantly lower than diagnostic ERCP. An EUS-based strategy costs less than diagnostic ERCP in patients with low, moderate, or intermediate risk. Conclusions: EUS is comparably accurate, but safer and less costly than ERCP for evaluating patients with suspected choledocholithiasis. It is useful in patients with an increased risk of having common bile duct stones based on clinical criteria and those with contraindications for or prior unsuccessful ERCP. EUS may enable selective performance of ERCP and improve the cost-effectiveness of diagnosing choledocholithiasis. (Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:439-48.)     

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: A single-stage minimally invasive procedure would be optimal for management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Two alternative strategies are available: management by laparoscopy alone or a combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach. This study evaluates the results of the latter procedure. METHODS: From June 1993 to September 1997, 1400 patients with symptomatic biliary stone disease were evaluated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed on the basis of a preoperative suspicion of bile duct stones; bile duct stone treatment was by intraoperative endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Intraoperative cholangiography was performed because of a preoperative suspicion of a bile duct abnormality in 141 of 1400 patients (10%) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of biliary stone disease. Of those 141 patients, 54 (38.3%) presented with pathologic findings (bile duct stone [52] and papillary stenosis [2]); all 54 underwent intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. Complete clearance of the ductal stones was achieved in 43 patients (82.7%) by intraoperative sphincterotomy, and in 9 patients by an additional postoperative endoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out in all cases. There were no conversions to an open operation. Postoperative course in the uncomplicated cases was comparable to that for laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone. The postoperative complication rate was 5.6% and mortality 1.8%. Mean hospital stay was 3.3 days (range 2 to 16). At a mean 38 months follow-up, no complications related to the laparoscopic-endoscopic procedure were observed. CONCLUSION: The intraoperative combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach seems to be a feasible and effective management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis, saving patients a subsequent invasive procedure.