Should insertion of intramedullary nails for tibial fractures be with or without reaming? A prospective, randomized study with 3.8 years' follow-up

OBJECTIVE: To determine if any differences exist in healing and complications between reamed and unreamed nailing in patients with tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized. SETTING: Level 1 trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-five patients with displaced closed and open Gustilo type I-IIIA fractures of the central two thirds of the tibia. INTERVENTION: Stabilization of tibial fractures either with a slotted, stainless steel reamed nail or a solid, titanium unreamed nail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Nonunions, time to fracture healing, and rate of malunions. RESULTS: The average time to fracture healing was 16.7 weeks in the reamed group and 25.7 weeks in the unreamed group. The difference was statistically significant (P = 0.004). There were three nonunions, all in the unreamed nail group. Two of these fractures healed after dynamization by removing static interlocking screws. The third nonunion did not heal despite exchange reamed nailing 2 years after the primary surgery and dynamization with a fibular osteotomy after an additional 1 year. There were two malunions in the reamed group and four malunions in the unreamed group. There were no differences for all other outcome measurements. CONCLUSION: Unreamed nailing in patients with tibial shaft fractures may be associated with higher rates of secondary operations and malunions compared with reamed nailing. The time to fracture healing was significantly longer with unreamed nails.     

Effect of acute reamed versus unreamed intramedullary nailing on compartment pressure when treating closed tibial shaft fractures: a randomized prospective study

OBJECTIVE: To compare anterior and deep posterior compartment pressures during reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of displaced, closed tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Randomized prospective study. SETTING: University Hospital/Level I trauma center. PATIENTS: Forty-eight adults with forty-nine fractures treated with intramedullary nailing within three days of injury. INTERVENTION: After intraoperative placement of compartment pressure monitors, the tibia fractures were treated by either unreamed intramedullary nailing or reamed intramedullary nailing. A fracture table and skeletal traction were not used in any of these procedures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Compartment pressures and deltaP ([diastolic blood pressure] - [compartment pressure]) were measured immediately preoperatively, intraoperatively, and for twenty-four hours postoperatively. RESULTS: Compartment syndrome did not occur in any patient. Peak average pressures were obtained during reaming in the reamed group (30.0 millimeters of mercury anterior compartment, 34.7 millimeters of mercury deep posterior compartment) and during nail insertion in the unreamed group (33.9 millimeters of mercury anterior compartment, 35.2 millimeters of mercury deep posterior compartment). The average pressures quickly returned to less than thirty millimeters of mercury and remained there for the duration of the study. The deep posterior compartment pressures were lower in the reamed group than in the unreamed group at ten, twelve, fourteen, sixteen, eighteen, twenty, twenty-two, and twenty-four hours postoperatively (p < 0.05 at each of these times. A statistically significant difference between anterior compartment pressures could not be shown with the numbers available. The deltaP values were greater than thirty millimeters of mercury at all times after nail insertion in both the reamed and unreamed groups. CONCLUSION: These data support acute (within three days of injury) reamed intramedullary nailing of closed, displaced tibial shaft fractures without the use of a fracture table.     

Current management of tibial shaft fractures: A survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons

Background and purpose?Strategies to manage tibial fractures include nonoperative and operative approaches. Strategies to enhance healing include a variety of bone stimulators. It is not known what forms of management for tibial fractures predominate among Canadian orthopedic surgeons. We therefore asked a representative sample of orthopedic trauma surgeons about their management of tibial fracture patients.

Methods?This was a cross-sectional survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons. We inquired about demographic variables and current tibial shaft fracture management strategies.

Results?268 surgeons completed the survey, a response rate of 60%. Most respondents (80%) managed closed tibial shaft fracture operatively; 47% preferred reamed intramedullary nailing and 40% preferred unreamed. For open tibial shaft fractures, 59% of surgeons preferred reamed intramedullary nailing. Some surgeons (16%) reported use of bone stimulators for management of uncomplicated open and closed tibial shaft fractures, and almost half (45%) made use of this adjunctive modality for complicated tibial shaft fractures. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound and electrical stimulation proved equally popular (21% each) and 80% of respondents felt that a reduction in healing time of 6 weeks or more, attributed to a bone stimulator, would be clinically important.

Interpretation?Current practice regarding orthopedic management of tibial shaft fractures in Canada strongly favors operative treatment with intramedullary nailing, although respondents were divided in their preference for reamed and unreamed nailing. Use of bone stimulators is common as an adjunctive modality in this injury population. Large randomized trials are needed to provide better evidence to guide clinical decision making regarding the choice of reamed or unreamed nailing for tibial shaft fractures, and to inform surgeons about the actual effect of bone stimulators.     

Systematic review shows lowered risk of nonunion after reamed nailing in patients with closed tibial shaft fractures

Nonunion after intramedullary nailing (IMN) in patients with tibial shaft fractures occurs up to 16%. There is no agreement whether reaming prior to IMN insertion would reduce the nonunion rate. We aimed to compare the nonunion rate between reamed and unreamed IMN in patients with tibial shaft fractures.A systematic search was conducted in Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. The selected publications were: (1) randomised controlled trials; (2) comparing the nonunion rate; (3) in patients with tibial shaft fractures; (4) treated with either reamed or unreamed IMN.Seven studies that satisfied the criteria were identified. They showed that reamed IMN led to reduction of nonunion rate compared to unreamed IMN in closed tibial shaft fractures (risk difference ranging 7.0-20%, number needed to treat ranging 5-14), while the difference between compared treatments for open tibial shaft fractures was not clinically relevant.The evidence showed a consistent trend of reduced nonunion rate in closed tibial shaft fracture treated with reamed compared to unreamed IMN.     

Exchange nailing for failure of initially rodded tibial shaft fractures

This retrospective study evaluated 32 patients who underwent exchange nailing for initially rodded nonunited tibial shaft fractures during a 5-year period. High-energy trauma accounted for 22 fractures; 19 fractures were open. An unreamed nail was initially used to stabilize all but 2 fractures. Implant failure occurred in 31% of fractures, mostly in distal-third fractures, with a failure rate of 34%. Average time from injury to exchange nailing was 36 weeks (range: 6-148 weeks) and consisted of closed reamed nailing and fibulectomy in 27 cases. Healing occurred an average of 20 weeks (range: 6-47 weeks) after postexchange nailing in 27 (84%) fractures. Four (12.5%) fractures healed after additional procedures. There was 1 persistent nonunion. Factors leading to delay in union time included comminution, healed fibula, and proximal location. Multiple regression analysis using survival data at P<.05 showed a significant correlation between fracture configuration and fixation method (locked, dynamic, and unlocked) on time to union. Exchange nailing with closed reaming and fibulectomy is a viable option for treating failures of primarily nailed tibial fractures. Increased stability and stimulation of arrested bone healing may account for the good outcome. The advantages of repeat reamed nailings should be weighed against the possible adverse effect of reaming on bone vascularity.     

Safe surgical technique: intramedullary nail fixation of tibial shaft fractures

Statically locked, reamed intramedullary nailing remains the standard treatment for displaced tibial shaft fractures. Establishing an appropriate starting point is a crucial part of the surgical procedure. Recently, suprapatellar nailing in the semi-extended position has been suggested as a safe and effective surgical technique. Numerous reduction techiques are available to achieve an anatomic fracture alignment and the treating surgeon should be familiar with these maneuvers. Open reduction techniques should be considered if anatomic fracture alignment cannot be achieved by closed means. Favorable union rates above 90 % can be achieved by both reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing. Despite favorable union rates, patients continue to have functional long-term impairments. In particular, anterior knee pain remains a common complaint following intramedullary tibial nailing. Malrotation remains a commonly reported complication after tibial nailing. The effect of postoperative tibial malalignment on the clinical and radiographic outcome requires further investigation.     

Acute unreamed intramedullary nailing and soft tissue reconstruction with muscle flaps for the treatment of severe open tibial shaft fractures

BACKGROUND: The treatment of open tibial shaft fractures remains controversial. Important considerations in surgical management include surgical timing, fixation technique and soft tissue coverage. This study was performed to evaluate the results of acute surgical debridement, unreamed nailing and soft tissue reconstruction in the treatment of severe open tibial shaft fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: During a 10-year period between January 1993 and July 2002, 927 tibial shaft fractures were treated with interlocking intramedullary nails. Among them, there were 19 consecutive patients with Gustilo type IIIB to IIIC open tibial shaft fractures with extensive soft tissue injury needing a muscle flap coverage and being suitable for intramedullary nailing. All 19 patients were called for a late follow-up which was conducted with a physical examination and a radiographic and functional outcome assessment. The radiographs were reviewed to determine the fracture healing time and the final alignment. RESULTS: All 19 open fractures with severe soft tissue injury healed without any infection complications. The fractures united in a mean of 8 months. Nine patients had delayed fracture healing (union time over 24 weeks). One of these patients needed exchange nailing, one patient autogenous bone grafting and dynamisation on the nail and seven patients needed dynamisation of the nail before the final fracture healing. In all patients, the alignment was well maintained. However, seven patients had shortening of the tibia by 1-2 cm and two of them also external rotation of 10 degrees . The functional outcome was good in 18/19 patients. INTERPRETATION: Acute surgical debridement, unreamed interlocking intramedullary nailing and soft tissue reconstruction with a muscle flap appear to be a safe and effective method of treatment for Gustilo type IIIB open tibial shaft fractures.     

Closed tibial shaft fractures: management and treatment complications. A review of the prospective literature.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the results and complications of the various modalities for treating closed fractures of the tibial shaft described in the prospective literature. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE search of the English language literature from 1966 to 1999 was conducted using the MeSH heading "tibial fractures." Studies pertaining to the management of closed tibial shaft fractures were reviewed, and their reference lists were searched for additional articles. STUDY SELECTION: An analysis of the relevant prospective, randomized controlled trials was performed. Studies including confounding data on open fractures or fractures in children were excluded. The 13 remaining studies were reviewed. DATA EXTRACTION: Raw data were extracted and pooled for each method of treatment. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 13 studies described 895 tibial shaft fractures treated by application of a plaster cast, fixation with plate and screws, and reamed or unreamed intramedullary nailing. Although definitions varied, the combined incidence of delayed and nonunion was lower with operative treatment (2.6% with plate fixation, 8.0% with reamed nailing and 16.7% with unreamed nailing) than with closed treatment (17.2%). The incidence of malunion was similarly lower with operative treatment (0% with plate fixation, 3.2% with reamed nailing and 11.8% with unreamed nailing) than with closed treatment (31.7%). Superficial infection was most common with plate fixation (9.0%) compared with 2.9% for reamed nailing, 0.5% for unreamed nailing and 0% for closed treatment. The incidence of osteomyelitis was similar for all groups. Rates of reoperation ranged from 4.7% to 23.1%. CONCLUSIONS: All forms of treatment for tibial shaft fractures are associated with complications. A knowledge of the incidence of each complication facilitates the consent process. To fully resolve the controversy as to the best method of treatment, a large, randomized, controlled trial is required. This review more precisely predicts the expected incidence of complications, allowing the numbers of required patients to be more accurately determined for future randomized controlled studies.     

可膨胀髓内钉和交锁髓内钉在胫骨干骨折治疗中的比较

目的 对可膨胀髓内钉和交锁髓内钉在胫骨骨折治疗中的相关因素进行比较分析。方法 2004年6月至2005年10月间，收治胫骨干骨折57例，42例行交锁髓内钉固定，15例行可膨胀髓内钉固定。对两组病例的手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视时间、术后并发症、骨折愈合时间进行比较。结果 两组在手术时间、术中出血量、术中透视时间、骨折愈合时间等方面差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05），在术后并发症上无显著性差异（P〉0．05）。因此可膨胀髓内钉组在多方面均优于交锁髓内钉组。结论 可膨胀髓内钉具有操作方便、创伤小、愈合快等优点，但费用昂贵，适应症较窄。     

Expandable nailing system for tibial shaft fractures

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and present our current clinical experience in the treatment of closed and open tibial shaft fractures using the expandable intramedullary nailing system. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: One level-1 trauma centre. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-six patients with acute tibial shaft fractures with at least 10 cm of intact cortex on both sides of the fracture. INTERVENTION: Internal fixation using the Fixion expandable intramedullary nail (Disc-O-Tech Medical Technologies Ltd., Herzliya, Israel). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Operative and fluoroscopy time, healing time and perioperative complications were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-six tibial fractures were treated (OTA classification: 3 type A1, 8 A2, 8 A3, 3 B1, 3 B2, and 1 B3), six of which were open. All fractures healed by week 18.5 with an mean of 12.8+/-3.8 weeks. The operating time ranged from 20 to 50 min with an mean of 40+/-12.17 min. The fluoroscopy time ranged from 6 to 22s with a mean of 10+/-5s. In one case the nail failed to expand, as detected by X-ray control, and had to be exchanged intraoperatively. Two patients reported anterior knee pain during the follow up, but did not wish any further treatment. In a low demanding patient rotational malalignment was noted and no further action needed. CONCLUSION: According to the results of this study, the use of the Fixion nailing system, where indicated, is associated with minimal complications and very good functional outcomes in fractures OTA types A and B. The advantages of the expandable nail include the decrease in the operating and fluoroscopy time and the simplicity of its application.     

Prospective study of the clinico-radiological outcome of interlocked nailing in proximal third tibial shaft fractures

BACKGROUND: Almost 9% of tibial shaft fractures occur in the proximal third of the bone. In order to address the problems of mal-alignment and late loss of fixation, all the specific surgical techniques described in the literature were used in nailing these fractures in our study. METHODS: From December 2001 to December 2003, 45 consecutive patients with fracture of the proximal third of the tibial shaft underwent nailing. The clinico-radiological outcome of these cases and the complications encountered were analysed. RESULTS: The average time to knee mobilisation and partial weight-bearing walking was 3.2 days. The fractures had united at an average of 4.3 months. At the last follow up, the average lower extremity functional score was 96%. There were seven cases of malunion (15.56%), with three valgus and four apex anterior angulations. Delayed union necessitated open bone grafting in three cases, at an average of 6.3 months. At 8 months, one patient with delayed union experienced nail breakage across the weakest point, i.e. the dynamic screw hole. He underwent reamed exchange nailing and, 3 months later, the fracture had united. CONCLUSION: Meticulous intramedullary nailing of fractures of the proximal third of the tibial shaft, using all current surgical principles and techniques, has excellent clinico-radiological outcome and is relatively safe. We recommend a nail similar to a Sirus nail, but with a more proximal bend of the nail and no dynamic interlocking screw hole.     

Expandable intramedullary nailing for tibial and femoral fractures: a preliminary analysis of perioperative complications

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of using the expandable nailing system in the treatment of femoral and tibial shaft fractures. DESIGN: Prospective, cohort series. SETTING: Two level-1 university trauma centers. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-eight patients with acute, traumatic diaphyseal fractures of the tibia or femur. INTERVENTION: Internal fixation of lower extremity long bone fractures using expandable intramedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Perioperative complications and time to healing. RESULTS: Forty-nine long bone fractures were treated: 22 femoral fractures (OTA classification: 4 type A1, 6 A2, 7 A3, 1 B1, and 4 B2) and 27 tibial fractures (OTA classification: 4 type A1, 11 A2, 9 A3, 0 B1, and 3 B2). There were 13 open fractures and 37 closed fractures. Healing occurred in 37 (75%) fractures without additional interventions. There were 2 tibial delayed unions and 1 femoral and 1 tibial nonunion. Five tibial shaft fractures and 6 femoral fractures shortened by 1.0 cm or more postoperatively. In 3 tibias and 4 femurs, shortening occurred after fractures judged to be length-stable became unstable because of fracture propagation during nail expansion. Five tibias and 3 femurs were converted to standard locked nails because of shortening. The average time to healing, excluding nonunion, was 15 weeks in the tibia and 16 weeks in the femur. The expandable nail resulted in an unplanned reoperation in 12 cases (25%). CONCLUSION: We found a high complication rate because of shortening, which was independent of fracture classification. Consequently, we cannot recommend the use of an unlocked, expandable nail in diaphyseal fractures of the femur or tibia.     

Prospective randomized study of reamed versus unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing: an assessment of procedures

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the procedure of unreamed femoral nailing is simpler, faster, and safer than reamed femoral intramedullary nailing. DESIGN: Prospective randomized. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred femoral shaft fractures without significant concomitant injuries admitted to an academic Level 1 urban trauma center. INTERVENTION: Stabilization of the femoral shaft fracture using a reamed or unreamed technique. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The surgical time, estimated blood loss, fluoroscopy time, and perioperative complications were prospectively recorded. RESULTS: One hundred patients with 100 femoral shaft fractures were correctly prospectively randomized to the study. Thirty-seven patients received reamed and sixty-three patients received unreamed nails. All nails were interlocked proximally and distally. The average surgical time for the reamed nail group was 138 minutes and for unreamed nail group was 108 minutes (p = 0.012). The estimated blood loss for the reamed nail group was 278 milliliters and for the unreamed nail group 186 milliliters (p = 0.034). Reamed intramedullary nailing required an average of 4.72 minutes, whereas unreamed nailing required 4.29 minutes of fluoroscopy time. Seven perioperative complications occurred in the reamed nail group and eighteen in the unreamed nail group. Two patients in the unreamed group required an early secondary procedure. Iatrogenic comminution of the fracture site occurred during three reamed and six unreamed intramedullary nailings. Reaming of the canal was required before the successful placement of three nails in the unreamed group because of canal/nail diameter mismatch. CONCLUSIONS: Unreamed femoral intramedullary nailing involves fewer steps and is significantly faster with less intraoperative blood loss than reamed intramedullary nailing. The unreamed technique, however, was associated with a higher incidence of perioperative complications, although the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.5).     

"Biorigid" interlocking after unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures

Between April 1996 and December 1999, 76 tibial shaft fractures were treated at the Department of Trauma Surgery of the Justus-Liebig-University in Giessen, Germany and the Department of Orthopedic Surgery of the University of Louisville, USA with a newly developed, unreamed, solid, small diameter tibial nail interlocked "biorigidly" with screws in grooves of the nail. 69 Patients were reviewed with a minimal follow-up period of 16 months. In 65 patients, the fractures united without exchange nailing, although four of these fractures showed a delay of healing. In further four cases, non-union occurred, one of which was associated with the only break of a nail located at a distal interlocking groove of the nail. In one patient, a late medullary infection so far has not recurred following treatment. In 358 implanted interlocking screws, no implant failure was observed. First clinical experience suggests that, especially due to the low rate of material fatigue, the biorigid nail is an alternative to other implants for unreamed intramedullary nailing of the tibia.     

Intramedullary nailing in femoral shaft fractures. Evaluation of a group of 101 cases

The Authors analyse the results of intramedullary nailing in a group of 101 femoral shaft fractures. Used nails: Universal Synthes (62 cases), Russel-Taylor (14), Gamma long (10), uncannulated femoral nail (9), cannulated femoral nail (4) and proximal femoral nail (2). Stabilisation of the femoral shaft fracture was possible using a reamed technique in 91 cases, unreamed in 10. All nails were locked. Dynamisation was performed in 35 cases and was not in 66. The fracture heal was faster with the reaming and dynamisation technique. Ten fractures were open (5 Gustilo I, 5 Gustilo II) and stabilisation with Universal Synthes nail (8 cases), Russel-Taylor nail (1) and Gamma long nail (1) was performed. No infection was detected. Lung embolism (6) and deep vein thrombosis (3) occurred only in the case of reamed nails. All results confirm the locking nail system as the best treatment in the shaft fractures, especially with new-generation nails.     

Comparison of unreamed nailing and external fixation of tibial diastases--mechanical conditions during healing and biological outcome.

Locked intramedullary nailing and external fixation are alternatives for the stabilization of tibial shaft fractures. The goal of this study was to determine to what extent the mechanical conditions at the fracture site influence the healing process after unreamed tibial nailing compared to external fixation. A standardized tibial diastasis was stabilized with either a locked unreamed tibial nail or a monolateral fixator in a sheep model. Interfragmentary movements and ground reaction parameters were monitored in vivo throughout the healing period. After sacrifice, the tibiae were examined mechanically and histologically. Bending angles and axial torsion at the fracture site were larger in the nail group within the first five weeks post-operatively. Unlike the fixator group, the operated limb in the nail group did not return to full weight bearing during the treatment period. Mechanical and histomorphometrical observations showed significantly inferior bone healing in the nail group compared to the fixator group. In this study, unreamed nailing of a tibial diastasis did not provide rotational stability of the osteosynthesis and resulted in a significant delay in bone healing.     

A prospective, randomized study of intramedullary nails inserted with and without reaming for the treatment of open and closed fractures of the tibial shaft

OBJECTIVES: To determine if there are differences in healing, complications, or number of procedures required to obtain union among open and closed tibia fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nails inserted with and without reaming. DESIGN: Prospective, surgeon-randomized comparative study. SETTING: Level One trauma center. PATIENTS: Ninety-four consecutive patients with unstable closed and open (excluding Gustilo Grade IIIB and IIIC) fractures of the tibial shaft treated with IM nail insertion between November 1, 1994, and June 30, 1997. INTERVENTION: Interlocked IM nail insertion with and without medullary canal reaming. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Time to union, type and incidence of complications, and number of secondary procedures performed to obtain union. RESULTS: For open fractures, there were no significant differences in the time to union or number of additional procedures performed to obtain union in patients with reamed nail insertion compared with those without reamed insertion. A higher percentage of closed fractures were healed at four months after reamed nail insertion compared with unreamed insertion (p = 0.040), but there was not a difference at six and twelve months. More secondary procedures were needed to obtain union after unreamed nail insertion for the treatment of closed tibia fractures, but the difference was not statistically significant given the limited power of our study (p = 0.155). Broken screws were seen only in patients treated with smaller-diameter nails inserted without reaming, and the majority occurred in patients who were noncompliant with weight-bearing restrictions. There were no differences in rates of infection or compartment syndrome. CONCLUSION: Our findings support the use of reamed insertion of IM nails for the treatment of closed tibia fractures, which led to earlier time to union without increased complications. In addition, canal reaming did not increase the risk of complications in open tibia fractures.     

Reamed versus minimally reamed nailing: a prospectively randomised study of 100 patients with closed fractures of the tibia

It is generally accepted that in tibial fractures the results of reamed intramedullary nailing are better than those of unreamed. However, it is not known whether the clinical effects of reaming are cumulative or if minimal reaming would induce the same beneficial effects as more extensive reaming. This international multicentre study has investigated the effects of different degrees of reaming. 100 patients with closed diaphyseal tibial fractures were prospectively randomised in two centres. Method of treatment was reamed nailing up to 12 mm inserting an 11 mm tibial nail (n: 50), and minimally reamed nailing up to 10 mm inserting a 9 mm tibial nail (n: 50). All patients included in the study had follow-up studies at 4,8,12,16,26 and 52 weeks after trauma. Sixty-six male and thirty-four female patients with an average age of 37.5 years were included in the study. Gender, age, and injury side were identical in both groups. There was no significant difference of complications in the two methods. The rate of deep wound infections was higher in the reamed group (n: 3) versus the minimally reamed group (n: 1). Union occurred earlier in the reamed group (17 wks) compared to patients with minimally reamed nailing (19 wks), and there were more patients with reamed nails in whom the fracture had healed by 16 weeks (57%) versus the minimally reamed group (43%), however, this was not statistically significant. Pain scales were similar for both groups from week 4 to week 52. A considerable number of outcome parameters including knee and ankle function, as well as the comparison of time intervals to restart certain activities, and return to work showed no significant statistical difference between the two groups. However, patients of the extensive reamed group returned earlier to running, training, and normal sports activities. This study found no significant evidence that more extensive reaming gave better results, however there seemed to be a tendency of more aggressive reaming to induce earlier fracture healing with a tendency of faster recovery times.     

Contributing factors affecting initial bony healing in interlocking nailings for femoral shaft fractures

The objective of this study was to evaluate bony healing and predict factors affecting bony healing of femoral fractures treated with interlocking nailing (ILN) in static or dynamic conditions, and in reamed or unreamed procedures. Seventy-four femoral fractures (69 patients) were initially stabilized with ILNs in static condition. Among these fractures, ten static ILNs were dynamized after approximately 6 (median 6.4, range 1–13) months because of poor fracture healing. Reamed ILNs were performed for 55 fractures and unreamed ILNs for 19 fractures. Clinical and roentgenograhic processes were analyzed with emphasis on whether or not ILNs were dynamized. To evaluate any significant contributing factors affecting the nonunion of femoral shaft fractures treated with ILNs, logistic regression analysis was done. The union rates of static ILNs and dynamized ILNs were 92% (59/64) and 70% (7/10) respectively, but there was no significant difference between them. Five nonunions were seen in reamed ILNs and three in unreamed ILNs. The predictive logistic regression equation for nonunion was as follows: Log 1-p/p=1.05 -1.20 × AO/ASIF fracture grade in the femur -3.07 × existence of multiskeletal trauma in lower extremity + 0.06 × age -1.11 × smoking history -0.3 × existence of polytrauma -0.626 × the severity of soft tissue injury ( p=0.002; each variable in the above equation was arranged according to the significant order). Among the variables, AO fracture grade (type C) in the femur and existence of multiskeletal trauma in lower extremity were significantly related to nonunion. Static ILN in most femoral shaft fractures does not inhibit the process of fracture healing. The following associated skeletal lesions were our concerns for nonunion and broken nail in static or dynamic ILNs: (1) C-type femoral fracture; and (2) existence of multiskeletal trauma, such as double lesions in the ipsilateral femur, floating knee injury, and bilateral femoral fractures.     

Ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fractures: complications and their treatment

An ipsilateral femoral neck fracture occurs in approximately 6% to 9% of all femoral shaft fractures. Despite this relatively common presentation, decision-making often is difficult. Furthermore, the risk for complications is greater in the treatment of this combination injury pattern than for single-level fractures. A retrospective review of the authors' large trauma database revealed 13 patients who had healing complications develop after their index surgical procedure. Six of the eight (75%) femoral neck nonunions occurring in these 13 patients developed after the use of a second generation, reconstruction-type intramedullary nail. Factors contributing to nonunion of the femoral shaft were the presence of an open fracture, use of an unreamed, small diameter intramedullary nail, and prolonged delay to weightbearing. The femoral neck nonunions healed after either valgus intertrochanteric osteotomy (seven patients) or compression hip screw fixation (one patient). The femoral shaft nonunion proved more difficult than expected to treat with some patients with femoral shaft nonunions requiring more than one operative procedure to achieve union. Lag screw fixation of the femoral neck fracture and reamed intramedullary nailing for shaft fracture stabilization were associated with the fewest complications. Therefore, this approach is recommended as the treatment of choice.