Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is a distinct entity characterized by papillary proliferations of mucin-producing epithelial cells with excessive mucus production and cystic dilatation of the pancreatic ducts. IPMNs have malignant potential and exhibit a broad histologic spectrum, ranging from adenoma to invasive carcinoma. IPMNs are classified into main duct and branch duct types, based on the site of tumor involvement. IPMN patients have a favorable prognosis if appropriately treated. The postoperative 5-year survival rate is nearly 100% for benign tumors and noninvasive carcinoma, and approximately 60% for invasive carcinoma. A main duct type IPMN should be resected. Surgical treatment is indicated for a branch duct IPMN with suspected malignancy (tumor diameter ≥ 30 mm, mural nodules, dilated main pancreatic duct, or positive cytology) or positive symptoms. Malignant IPMNs necessitate lymph node dissection (D1). IPMNs are associated with a high incidence of extrapancreatic malignancies and pancreatic ductal carcinoma.     

Clinicopathological features and medical management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMN) are a clinicopathological entity that is being diagnosed with increasing frequency. However, the best approach to medical management of IPMN needs to be clarified. The aim of the present study was to identify preoperative features that may be predictors of malignant IPMN, and to define the medical management of IPMN of the pancreas. METHODS: A total of 23 patients who underwent surgical resection for IPMN of the pancreas at Kochi Medical School between 1982 and 2004 were examined. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with IPM carcinoma. RESULTS: Among the 23 patients, 12 had IPMN adenoma, three had borderline IPMN, four had IPMN with carcinoma in situ, and four had IPMN with invasive carcinoma. In multivariate analysis, elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels were found to be preoperative predictors of malignant IPMN. These results suggest that the following IPMN of the pancreas should be resected: (i) IPMN of the pancreas situated in the main duct; (ii) IPMN located in the branch duct if the size of the cystic lesion is >30 mm and the mural nodules are >5 mm in height by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS); and (iii) the diameter of the main pancreatic duct is >10 mm by endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP). Careful observation of patients with branch-type IPMN with small cysts and/or without mural nodules is recommended as a management strategy. CONCLUSION: The present study reinforces the need for immediate surgical resection of malignant IPMN and suggests indicators for IPMN that should assist physicians in making decisions on treatment options.     

Outcome of the pancreatic remnant following segmental pancreatectomy for non-invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

ObjectivesIntraductual papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are often multifocal and involve the entire pancreas. Because of the morbidity associated with total pancreatectomy, surgeons will perform segmental pancreatectomy, resecting only the most ‘threatening’ IPMN lesion(s). We sought to determine whether the presence of residual IPMN following segmental pancreatectomy for non-invasive IPMN increases the risk for subsequent development of invasive pancreatic cancer and decreases survival.MethodsData on patients undergoing segmental resection of non-invasive IPMN during the period 1991–2010 at a high-volume academic institution were prospectively accrued.ResultsOf 243 patients who underwent segmental resection for IPMN, 191 (79%) demonstrated non-invasive pathology. Of these, 153 (80%) showed the absence and 38 (20%) the presence of residual IPMN at the initial operation. Of the 38 patients with residual IPMN, eight had positive IPMN margins, 23 had radiographic evidence of IPMN, and seven had both. During a mean follow-up of 73 months, 31 (20%) of 153 patients without residual IPMN developed a new radiographic lesion consistent with IPMN and, of these, three (10%) were found to represent invasive cancer. One (3%) of 38 patients with residual IPMN developed invasive cancer. In summary, in 191 initially non-invasive cases of IPMN, four invasive cancers (2%) developed during follow-up. The mean progression-free interval in these four patients was 54 months (range: 20–99 months).ConclusionsCompared with patients undergoing complete operative IPMN clearance, patients with residual IPMN after segmental pancreatectomy do not demonstrate increased risk for the development of invasive disease or reduced survival. In patients without residual IPMN who later develop new IPMN, the risk for invasive IPMN is increased.     

Prevalence,Diagnosis and Management of Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Current Status and Future Directions

Cystic neoplasms of the pancreas are found with increasing prevalence, especially in elderly asymptomatic individuals. Although the overall risk of malignancy is very low, the presence of these pancreatic cysts is associated with a large degree of anxiety and further medical investigation due to concerns about malignancy. This review discusses the different cystic neoplasms of the pancreas and reports diagnostic strategies based on clinical features and imaging data. Surgical and nonsurgical management of the most common cystic neoplasms, based on the recently revised Sendai guidelines, is also discussed, with special reference to intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN; particularly the branch duct variant), which is the lesion most frequently identified incidentally. IPMN pathology, its risk for development into pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, the pros and cons of current guidelines for management, and the potential role of endoscopic ultrasound in determining cancer risk are discussed. Finally, surgical treatment, strategies for surveillance of pancreatic cysts, and possible future directions are discussed.     

Invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm: predictors of survival and role of adjuvant therapy

Background

Adjuvant treatment for pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been shown to improve survival. An increasingly recognized ‘subtype’ of pancreatic adenocarcinoma is invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). It is unclear whether adjuvant treatment for invasive IPMN improves survival. This study aimed to determine the impact of adjuvant treatment in invasive IPMN.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of merged clinical databases including 412 patients undergoing resection for IPMN at two academic institutions between 1989 and 2006.

Results

Of 412 patients with IPMN who underwent pancreatectomy, 98 had invasive carcinoma. Median survival in invasive IPMN was 32 months. Adjuvant treatment did not affect median survival in node-positive or node-negative invasive IPMN. Biopsy-proven recurrence of invasive IPMN occurred in 45 patients (46%). The median disease-free interval from resection to recurrence was 27 months. Treatment of recurrences with chemotherapy or radiation therapy was not associated with a difference in survival; however, a subgroup of patients with recurrence in the remnant pancreas who underwent re-resection appeared to have more favourable outcomes.

Conclusions

An invasive component measuring >2 cm and lymph node involvement are associated with poorer prognosis. Adjuvant therapy in invasive IPMN appears to confer no survival benefit. In selected patients with recurrence of invasive IPMN in the remnant pancreas, re-resection should be considered.     

Pancreatic juice cytology in IPMN of the pancreas.

BACKGROUND: Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is a disease ranging from adenoma to borderline (with moderate dysplasia) and further to carcinoma (noninvasive and invasive) and surgical strategy is different by the grades of dysplasia. METHODS: Preoperative pancreatic juice cytology in IPMN was reviewed in 71 patients with IPMN who underwent surgical resection. RESULTS: The IPMN was adenoma in 48 patients, borderline in 13 and carcinoma (invasive) in 10. The sensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology in malignant IPMN was 40% (4/10). In 4 patients with the 48 IPM adenomas, diagnosis of pancreatic juice cytology was class IV or V. One of the 4 cases was considered to be an overdiagnosis of cytology, but the other 3 cases were considered to be a consequence of accompanying carcinoma in situ (or PanIN-3) (2 patients) or invasive ductal adenocarcinoma (1 patient) apart from IPMN. Sensitivity of pancreatic juice cytology was higher in IPMN of the main duct type with mucin hypersecretion and with mural nodules. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that pancreatic juice cytology in IPMN is useful especially in the main duct type with mucin hypersecretion and mural nodules. When the diagnosis of pancreatic juice cytology is malignant in otherwise benign-looking IPMNs, coexistence of pancreatic carcinoma should be suspected.     

A case of minimal invasive carcinoma from intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas]

A 69-year-old man was referred to our hospital for epigastralgia. He was found to have elevation of serum amylase and CA19-9. Ultrasonography, abdominal CT, MRCP, ERCP and EUS showed the cystic lesion and a possibility of an other tumor. There was a stenosis of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) at the pancreas head and dilatation of the MPD from the body to the tail. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the branch pancreatic duct was diagnosed, and there was a likelihood of ductal carcinoma of the pancreas. We therefore performed pancreatoduodenectomy. Pathological finding showed invasive carcinoma from an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm with invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas.     

Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas: A systematic review

BackgroundIntraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasm of the pancreas (IOPN–P) is a rare subtype of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). This study was performed to summarize the clinicopathological features and management of IOPN-P.MethodsEnglish-language articles were searched from MEDLINE and EMBASE from the first report of IOPN-P in 1996 until 1 May 2019 following the methodology in the PRISMA guidelines.ResultsIn total, 66 patients from 24 full articles were included in the final data analysis. The patients’ average age was 61 years, and the male/female ratio was 1. Most lesions were large (average size, 5.50 cm), located in the pancreatic head, and found either incidentally or by uncharacteristic abdominal symptoms. IOPN-P was usually a cystic and solid lesion with or without mural nodules on radiological examination. A definitive diagnosis was often acquired from fine needle aspiration biopsy or postoperative pathology. All tumors were diagnosed as carcinoma in situ or minimally invasive carcinoma, necessitating surgical resection. The prognosis of IOPN-P was better than that of other IPMN subtypes, even when metastasis occurred. Recurrence after surgical resection of IOPN-P was rare.ConclusionsIOPN-P is rare among IPMN subtypes with unique pathological characteristics. Because of the nontypical symptoms and radiological findings, a definitive preoperative diagnosis usually depends on multimodal examinations. Management and surveillance of IOPN-P after surgical resection should be differentiated from those of other pancreatic benign cystic lesions because of its relative malignancy, but IOPN-P should also be differentiated from other IPMN subtypes and malignant cystic tumors because of its favorable prognosis.     

Mode of progression of intraductal papillary-mucinous tumor of the pancreas: analysis of patients with follow-up by EUS

Background We investigated the mode of progression of intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas (IPMN) in patients who underwent follow-up in order to elucidate the characteristics of malignancy and to establish an effective treatment strategy.Methods Fifty-one patients with IPMN (branch-duct type, 47; main-duct type, 4) who had undergone follow-up study by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) were included (mean follow-up duration, 41.0 ± 32.3 months; average number of EUS examinations performed during follow-up, 4.4). Chronological changes in EUS findings and histological findings of resected specimens were evaluated.Results Of the patients with the branch-duct type, only 2% showed enlargement of the dilated branches. In the main-duct-type group, an increase in size of the main pancreatic duct (MPD) was observed in 75% of the patients. In 14 patients with papillary protrusions, an increase in size and lateral spread was observed in 71% and 43%, respectively. No patients developed invasive cancer. In 15 patients who had thick septum-like structures (TSS), the development of papillary protrusions and that of invasive cancer were observed in 53% and 13%, respectively. Twenty-nine patients who had thin septum-like structures showed no change. Two patients with dense multilocular large cysts and TSS developed invasive cancer without change in the cystic lesions. One patient developed carcinoma with multifocal stromal invasion.Conclusions Patients with branch-duct type IPMNs without papillary protrusions or TSS are not immediate candidates for surgery. Those who have small papillary protrusions have a benign course. It is recommended that patients with the large branch-duct type with TSS should undergo surgery. Attention should be paid to the entire pancreas when performing follow-up examinations in patients with branch-duct type IPMN, as invasive ductal adenocarcinoma can develop at a site in the pancreas different from that of the IPMN.     

A case of metachronous invasive ductal carcinoma concomitant with intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas, which could not be detected in contrast-enhanced CT scan performed 3 months ago

A 61-year-old man had been followed up in another hospital under diagnosis of branch duct type IPMN for 4 years. Contrast-enhanced CT scan for regular check performed 3 months ago revealed no increase of IPMN and no pancreatic tumor. However, he complained of back pain after that, MRI was performed. It revealed a solid tumor in size of 25mm diameter at the head of pancreas. The tumor was apparent from IPMN in several imaging modalities. Pancreatoduodenectomy was performed under diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma concomitant with IPMN. Post-operative pathological findings revealed IPMN was adenoma with mild atypia, and solid tumor was diagnosed invasive ductal carcinoma with solitary minute liver metastasis.     

Postoperative recurrence of an IPMN of the pancreas with a fistula to the stomach

We report on a case of a 74 year old man who was diagnosed with a recurrence of non-invasive carcinoma of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (non-invasive IPMN) by postoperative gastroscopy (GS). A pylorus preserving pancreatico duodenectomy for IPMN in the pancreatic head was performed. A histopathological study revealed non-invasive adenocarcinoma. At first, the local recurrence of the tumor around the superior mesenteric artery circumference was diagnosed and disappeared with gemcitabine. Later, the GS showed the elevated lesion with mucin hypersecretion in the remnant stomach. The lesion had a central dip and a fistula common to the pancreas was confirmed on fisterography. We diagnosed a recurrence of IPMN and administered chemotherapy again. However, he died of his original illness. There are no reports of postoperative recurrence of IPMN checked by GS. It should be remembered that the elevated lesion of the remnant stomach is considered as one of the recurrent patterns of IPMN.     

Pylorus-preserving total pancreatectomy for an intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas

Background/Purpose

Total pancreatectomy (TP) is rarely performed to treat invasive ductal carcinoma of the pancreas, due to the associated markedly impaired quality of life and poor prognosis after the resection. Intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas is characterized by extensive intraductal spread and a favorable outcome even when presenting at an invasive stage. We herein reappraise the role of pylorus-preserving total pancreatectomy (PPTP) as a viable alternative pancreatic resection modality for borderline and malignant IPMN.

Methods

A total of five patients with IPMN underwent PPTP and their clinical follow-up data were reviewed.

Results

TP was performed due to recurrent IPMN in the remnant pancreas after distal pancreatectomy in three patients and due to massive involvement of the entire pancreas in the others. All patients were treated by the pylorus-preserving method, while the spleen was also preserved in one patient. The surgical margins were negative and no metastasis to the resected lymph nodes was evident, based on histological examinations. One patient underwent a re-operation due to postoperative intraabdominal bleeding, while another patient required tubedrainage for left pleural effusion. Three of the four patients who underwent PPTP with a splenectomy experienced postoperative gastric ulcer, which were controlled by medication. One patient died due to suicide 16 months after the PPTP. All the others were doing well without recurrence at periods of 62 to 127 months after the PPTP.

Conclusions

PPTP is therefore considered to be indicated as an effective treatment for borderline or malignant IPMN with extensive involvement, when the patient's condition permits, in order to achieve complete resection of the IPMN.     

Frequency of Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm in Patients with and without Pancreas Cancer

Purpose: To determine the frequency of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) in patients with and without invasive ductal adenocarcinoma (IDAC). Methods: 82 patients underwent pancreatectomy for pancreas adenocarcinoma. 68/82 subjects underwent at least one preoperative imaging study including CT (n = 43), MRI (n = 25), or both (n = 12). Imaging studies were retrospectively evaluated to determine if IPMN was present in the gland at a location distant from IDAC. In 183 different adult patients undergoing MRI for renal mass, images were evaluated to determine the frequency of IPMN. Fisher's exact test was used to test whether the prevalence of IPMN was greater among patients with pancreas cancer than those without. Results: Five of 68 (7.3%) patients who underwent pancreatic resection for IDAC had IPMN at a site distant from the cancer. Two of 182 (1.1%) patients undergoing MRI for renal cancer had imaging evidence of IPMN. There was a significant difference (p = 0.017) in the prevalence of IPMN between patients with and without IDAC. The odds ratio for IPMN as a predictor of pancreas cancer was estimated as 7.18. Conclusion: IPMN occurs with increased frequency in patients with pancreas cancer as opposed to those without pancreas cancer.     

Intraductal papillary-mucinous adenocarcinoma in the remnant pancreas after pancreatoduodenectomy for cancer of Vater's papilla associated with intraductal papillary-mucinous adenoma

A 72-year-old woman, who had undergone pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy 3 years before for cancer of Vater's papilla associated with a branch-type intraductal papillary-mucinous adenoma (IPMA), developed dilatation of the main duct and a nodular lesion in the remnant pancreas. Total pancreatectomy was performed, which revealed that the lesion was intraductal papillary-mucinous adenocarcinoma (IPMC) with minimal invasion, suggesting the metachronous multicentric occurrence of this intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). Because there were no malignant cells at the pancreaticojejunostomy, and because the histological appearance of the main-duct IPMC was different from that of the IPMA in the primary specimen, the main-duct IPMC was thought to be of different origin from the IPMA. These findings suggest that careful surveillance of the gastrointestinal tract and careful follow up are necessary for IPMN, because an IPMN could be associated with other gastrointestinal tract malignancies.     

What is the risk factor for metachronous colorectal carcinoma?

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for developing metachronous colorectal carcinoma and to determine an adequate postoperative colonoscopic surveillance. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-four patients, examined by routine colonoscopy after resection for colorectal carcinoma, were reviewed. Clinical and pathologic factors were assessed by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three patients with synchronous adenoma or carcinoma at the initial operation had a significantly higher incidence of both metachronous adenoma and carcinoma than the 101 patients without a synchronous lesion. Other clinical factors including age, gender, tumor stage, tumor site, and tumor grade were not significant for an increased incidence of metachronous carcinoma. The presence of synchronous lesions proved to be the only risk factor (relative risk, 3.293;P=0.0155) for developing metachronous carcinoma. Metachronous carcinoma was detected in 30 patients (10.6 percent) and completely removed from all patients. Mucosal carcinoma was found in 25 patients (8.8 percent) and invasive carcinoma in 5 patients (1.8 percent). All five invasive carcinomas were detected in asymptomatic patients having synchronous lesion. Four patients required a second operation for metachronous carcinoma more than 13 months following the first. CONCLUSION: The risk factor for developing metachronous carcinoma is the presence of synchronous adenoma or carcinoma at the initial operation. To detect metachronous carcinoma at a curable stage, annual colonoscopic surveillance should be performed for highrisk patients.Read at the meeting of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka, Japan, February 22 to 23, 1996.     

Lower serum PRL is associated with the development of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a retrospective cohort study

Background

When monitoring patients with an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), it is important to consider both IPMN-derived carcinoma and concomitant ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The latter is thought to have a poorer prognosis. We retrospectively analyzed the risk factors for concomitant PDAC in IPMN.

Methods

In total, 547 patients with pancreatic cysts, including IPMNs inappropriate for surgery on initial diagnosis, encountered from April 2005 to June 2019, were reviewed. We performed surveillance by imaging examination once or twice a year.

Results

Five IPMNs with high-grade dysplasia and one IPMN associated with invasive carcinoma were encountered. In comparison, 14 concomitant PDACs were encountered. The prognosis was very poor for concomitant PDACs. All 14 PDAC patients had IPMNs. In patients with IPMNs, long-standing diabetes mellitus was the only significant risk factor for concomitant PDAC in both univariate and multivariate analyses (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). Furthermore, patients with IPMNs and diabetes mellitus had a high frequency of concomitant PDACs (9.5%, 9/95) in a median 48-month surveillance period.

Conclusions

When monitoring IPMNs, the development of not only IPMN-derived carcinomas but also concomitant PDACs should be considered. During this period, it may be prudent to concentrate on patients with other risk factors for PDAC, such as long-standing diabetes mellitus.

     

Pancreatic CT density is an optimal imaging biomarker for earlier detection of malignancy in the pancreas with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

BackgroundIntraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) are typically detected as incidental findings by computed tomography (CT); however, the conventional surveillance is not valid for the early detection of concomitant pancreatic cancer. The pancreas of IPMN is often accompanied by fatty infiltration in the parenchyma, and pancreatic fatty infiltration could be evaluated by pancreatic CT density (pancreatic index, PI). We aimed to investigate whether PI could be an imaging biomarker for the early prediction of malignancies in the pancreas with IPMN.MethodsTwo different cohorts were investigated. (Investigation cohort): A total of 1137 patients with initially low-risk IPMN were compensated by initial IPMN findings, and 2 groups (malignancy/possible benign, 50 cases each) were investigated for yearly changes in PI and for the cutoff value of PI indicating the development of malignancies. (Validation cohort): To validate the cutoff value, 256 patients radiologically suspected of having IPMNs were investigated.Results(Investigation-cohort): The malignancy group showed a gradual decrease in PI every year, and PI significantly differed among the 2 groups 1 year prior to the last investigation. The cutoff value of PI was set at 0.65. (Validation-cohort): A total of 55% of the patients with a PI below the cutoff value had malignancy in the pancreas, including concomitant pancreatic cancer, and the cutoff value was the most significant risk factors for the development of malignancies in the pancreas compared to the conventional risk factors for IPMN.ConclusionsDecreasing PI would be an optimal imaging biomarker for earlier detection of malignancies in the pancreas with IPMN.     

Current understanding of precursors to pancreatic cancer

Precursors to pancreatic cancer have been investigated for a century. Previous studies have revealed three distinct precursors,i.e. mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN), intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), and pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN), harboring identical or similar genetic alterations as does invasive pancreatic carcinoma. The current understanding of precursors to pancreatic cancer can be illustrated by progressive pathways from noninvasive MCN, IPMN, and PanIN toward invasive carcinoma. MCNs consist of ovarian‐type stroma and epithelial lining with varying grades of atypia, and are occasionally associated with invasive adenocarcinoma. The epithelium of noninvasive IPMNs shows a variety of different directions of differentiation, including gastric, intestinal, pancreatobiliary (PB), and oncocytic types. IPMNs can also harbor varying grades of architectural and cytologic atypia. IPMNs confined to branch ducts are mostly the gastric type, and IPMNs involving the main ducts are often intestinal type, while PB and oncocytic types are rare. Small (<1 cm) IPMNs of the gastric type are not always morphologically distinguishable from low‐grade PanINs. Mucin expression profiles suggest intestinal‐type IPMNs progress to mucinous noncystic (colloid) carcinoma, while PB‐type IPMNs progress toward ductal adenocarcinoma. It is a well‐described paradigm that PanIN lesions progress toward ductal adenocarcinoma through step‐wise genetic alterations. The activation of Hedgehog and Notch signaling pathways in PanIN lesions as well as in pancreatic adenocarcinoma suggest that developmental pathways may be disregulated during carcinogenesis of the pancreas. Further study is needed to elucidate the pathways from precursors toward invasive carcinoma of the pancreas.     

The distance of tumor spread in the main pancreatic duct of an intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm: where to resect and how to predict it

Background

The surgical decision regarding where to resect the pancreas is an important judgement that is directly linked to the surgical procedure. An appropriate surgical margin to resect intraductal papillary-mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of the pancreas based on the distance of tumor spread (DTS) in the main pancreatic duct has not been adequately documented. We analyzed the appropriate surgical margin based on the DTS in the main pancreatic duct of IPMN and the positive rate at the pancreatic cut end margin.

Methods

Forty patients with main duct- or mixed-type IPMN diagnosed histopathologically who underwent surgery at Tokai University Hospital between 1991 and 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. The resection line was determined to achieve a 2-cm surgical margin in patients with main duct- or mixed-type IPMN and as limited a resection as possible to remove the dilated branch duct in patients with branch duct-type IPMN according to macroscopic type. The dysplastic state of the epithelium was judged as positive for carcinoma in situ (high-grade dysplasia) or adenoma (very low to moderate dysplasia) and judged as negative for hyperplasia or normal.

Results

The mean DTS in the main pancreatic duct was 41.6 ± 30.0 mm, and that of the distance of tumor absence was 13.6 ± 12.4 mm. The positive rate at the pancreatic cut end margin in frozen sections was 29.7%. The final positive rate at the pancreatic cut end margin was 26.2%. There has been no evidence of local recurrence in the remnant pancreas. DTS in the main pancreatic duct of IPMN was correlated with the maximum diameter of the duct (R = 0.678).

Conclusion

Distance of tumor spread offered important insights about the appropriate site to resect the pancreas and the positive rate at the cut end margin in IPMN.