Clinical experience with transdermal clonidine in African-American and Hispanic-American patients with hypertension: evaluation from a 12-week prospective, open-label clinical trial in community-based clinics.

The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of transdermal clonidine in inner-city African-American and Hispanic-American patients with essential hypertension. A multiclinic open-label, prospective trial for 12 weeks was used. Dose titration was based on office blood pressure (BP) measurements of > 140/90 mm Hg. Clinical sites were community-based primary care centers. Untreated and treated hypertensive patients whose diastolic BP exceeded 90 mm Hg were administered transdermal clonidine at 0.1 mg or 0.2 mg delivery daily. The drug was titrated after 1 month if diastolic BP was greater than 90 mm Hg. At 12 weeks of treatment, change in blood pressure from baseline as well as adverse effects and patient satisfaction were assessed. A total of 357 patients entered the treatment phase of the study, and 315 patients (244 African-Americans, 67 Hispanic-Americans) had evaluable data. Transdermal clonidine significantly (P <.001) lowered BP in all patients by 15.7/12.8 +/- 18.1/9.6 mm Hg, and heart rate was reduced by 3 +/- 9 beats/min (P <.001). There were no differences in BP reduction according to race and ethnicity, gender, or age. The most common adverse effects were pruritus or discomfort at the patch site, dizziness, dry mouth, and fatigue. Eleven percent of the patients discontinued treatment because of one of these adverse effects. A large proportion of patients (67%) reported that transdermal clonidine was more convenient to use than oral therapy. Transdermal clonidine, alone or in combination with other antihypertensive therapies, significantly lowered BP and heart rate in inner-city hypertensive patients. The drug was generally well tolerated, with 89% of the patients remaining in the trial. Patient acceptability was high with the once-weekly treatment, which is an important feature for this particular hypertensive population.     

Heart remodeling in case of isolated systolic arterial hypertension

Examination of 32 patients with isolated systolic arterial hypertension (office blood pressure 171.9 = -3.3/79.7 +/- 0.2 mm Hg) and 54 ones with systolic/diastolic hypertension) 179.8 +/- 3.9/114.8 +/- 1.9 mm Hg) showed that the former are characterized by isolated hypertrophy of interventricular septum, the latter by symmetric hypertrophy of the septum and free left ventricular wall. Septal hypertrophy affects the initial phase of diastolic filling of the left ventricle as appears from longer time of isovolume relaxation and low peak rate of early transmitral blood flow; it does not influence diastolic function of the right ventricle. Hypertrophy of the free left ventricular wall disturbs the final stage of early diastolic filling of both right and left ventricles manifest as increased duration of their slowed early filling.     

Labetalol infusion in hypertensive emergencies

The antihypertensive effects of labetalol infusion (2 mg/min; maximal dose 150 mg) were evaluated in 22 subjects requiring rapid lowering of blood pressure because of severe hypertension, a hypertensive crisis after surgery, or before angiographic examination. Overall systolic and diastolic blood pressures were reduced from 201 +/- 4 to 164 +/- 4 mm Hg and from 123 +/- 3 to 107 +/- 3 mm Hg, respectively. By the end of the infusion, diastolic blood pressure in 16 (73%) subjects was lowered to less than or equal to 110 mm Hg. No adverse effects were encountered, but one subject had a transitory hypotensive episode that did not require treatment. Intravenous labetalol appears effective and well tolerated in the control of blood pressure in hypertensive emergencies.     

Effects of delapril in combination with indapamide on blood pressure and left ventricular mass in elderly hypertensive patients

We present a single-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of the effects on blood pressure and left ventricular mass and of the safety of a combined antihypertensive treatment with delapril, a new nonsulfhydryl angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, and indapamide, a sulfonamide diuretic. We studied 28 elderly patients aged 65-85 years (mean age, 69 +/- 1) with sitting systolic/diastolic blood pressure of 160-200/95-115 mm Hg (at the end of the placebo period). After a 2-week placebo run-in, patients took 30 mg delapril in combination with 1.25 mg indapamide once daily for 24 weeks. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory blood pressure was monitored and M- and B-mode echocardiography were performed before and after 24 weeks of treatment. Blood pressure decreased from 156 +/- 1.5/101 +/- 1 mm Hg before treatment to 133 +/- 1/73 +/- 1 mm Hg after treatment. The total blood pressure burden also decreased; the percentage of measurements with a systolic blood pressure > or = 140 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure > or = 90 mm Hg decreased from 48.7% +/- 5%/31.5% +/- 4.3% to 23.5% +/- 4%/20.5% +/- 2.9% (p < 0.0005 and p < 0.05). The area under the curve of the 24-hour blood pressure decreased from 250 +/- 41/103 +/- 21 mm Hg to 97 +/- 21/37 +/- 8.5 mm Hg (p < 0.001 and p < 0.005). The left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in the 15 patients with pretreatment left ventricular hypertrophy was reduced after therapy from 167.5 +/- 8.5 g/m 2 to 152.2 +/- 7.6 g/m 2 (p < 0.05). A positive correlation was observed between percent changes of the area under the curve of the 24-hour diastolic blood pressure and percent changes of LVMI (r = 0.6; p < 0. 05) in the 15 patients with left ventricular hypertrophy. Only 2 patients reported side effects: 1 developed skin rash and 1 developed headache. The safety of the treatment was confirmed by laboratory tests. In elderly hypertensive patients, the combination of delapril and indapamide at low doses reduced blood pressure and had favorable effects on LVMI with few side effects.     

Usefulness of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide in moderately severe essential hypertension.

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor moexipril alone and in combination with hydrochlorothiazide versus hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with stage II and III essential hypertension. This was a double-blind, randomized, multicenter trial that evaluated moexipril (15 and 30 mg once daily), hydrochlorothiazide (25 and 50 mg once daily), and combinations of the drugs (15 mg moexipril/25 mg hydrochlorothiazide and 30 mg moexipril/50 mg hydrochlorothiazide) in 272 hypertensive patients whose seated diastolic blood pressure (BP) was 100 to 114 mm Hg. The primary efficacy variable was the mean change from baseline in seated diastolic BP at the end of the dosing period. Secondary efficacy measures included changes in systolic BP and standing BP. The lower doses of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide reduced diastolic BP similarly (-8.0 +/- 1.4 versus -8.1 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; p = NS) as did higher doses of the monotherapeutic regimens (moexipril, -9.7 +/- 1.2 mm Hg versus hydrochlorothiazide, -11.0 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, p = NS). Combinations of moexipril and hydrochlorothiazide reduced diastolic BP significantly more than either monotherapy (lower doses, -16.0 +/- 1.4 mm Hg; p < 0.001; higher doses, -17.9 +/- 1.2 mm Hg; p < 0.001). Similar trends were observed for the systolic BP. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 0% for the moexipril monotherapy patients and 3% to 5% in patients on diuretic or combination treatment. These data demonstrate that 15 and 30 mg moexipril once daily lower BP similarly to hydrochlorothiazide in patients with stage II and III hypertension. There is also an additive effect when combining the two agents that lowers BP more significantly than either monotherapy.     

Clonidine and guanfacine in hypertension

Guanfacine, 1 to 3 mg/day, and clonidine, 0.1 to 0.3 mg twice a day, were compared in a 24-week double-blind, randomized, parallel study of 42 patients with hypertension that was inadequately treated by chlorthalidone, 25 mg/day. Mean reduction of blood pressure was 18/9 mm Hg after guanfacine and 14/8 mm Hg after clonidine. To determine the incidence of rebound hypertension, subjects were hospitalized for 7 days during chlorthalidone therapy for collection of baseline data and once again immediately after abrupt withdrawal of the alpha-agonist after 24 weeks of dosing. Although blood pressure and heart rate rose significantly in both groups, the changes after clonidine withdrawal were greater and occurred earlier (day 2) than those after guanfacine withdrawal (day 4). Forty percent of the subjects receiving guanfacine and 64% of subjects receiving clonidine had diastolic blood pressure elevations greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg from baseline. There were increases in urinary norepinephrine levels in both groups after drug withdrawal, but these correlated poorly with blood pressure rise. Side effects after guanfacine were much the same as those after clonidine. Guanfacine taken once a day provides an effective and safe alternative to clonidine in the management of essential hypertension.     

Enalaprilat, an intravenous angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, in hypertensive crises

The effect of enalaprilat (MK-422), a newly synthesized, intravenous, nonsulfhydryl, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, was studied in seven patients with either severe or malignant hypertension. All subjects initially received a 1 mg bolus injection of enalaprilat followed in 30 minutes by 10 mg. Five subjects received an additional 40 mg. Mean (+/- SE) pretreatment blood pressure for the group was 226 +/- 9/141 +/- 7 mm Hg. Five minutes after the 1 mg enalaprilat dose, blood pressure decreased to 211 +/- 10/131 +/- 9 mm Hg and further fell to 201 +/- 14/123 +/- 11 mm Hg at 30 minutes. The maximal reduction in blood pressure to 169 +/- 14/112 +/- 10 mm Hg occurred 30 minutes after the 10 mg dose. No further blood pressure reduction was observed in those subjects who received the additional 40 mg dose. Within the entire group, five subjects exhibited sustained blood pressure reduction. No adverse side effects or symptomatic hypotension occurred in any subject.     

The central hypotensive effect of clonidine. Studies in tetraplegic subjects.

A single oral dose of 300 microng of clonidine lowered systolic blood pressure by 20 +/- 4 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure by 13 +/- 4 mm Hg in five healthy normotensive subjects (controls). Heart rate fell from 56 +/- 2 to 52 +/- 2 beats/min. In six tetraplegic subjects with physiologically complete chronic cervical spinal cord transection above the level of the sympathetic outflow, the same dose of clonidine did not significantly lower either systolic or diastolic blood pressure. Heart rate fell from 67 +/- 4 to 53 +/- 2 beats/min. Peak plasma concentrations of clonidine, measured by mass fragmentography, and elimination of the drug from plasma were similar in tetraplegic and control subjects and there was no difference in the incidence of the principal side effects of clonidine--sedation and dry mouth. Although the number of subjects studied is small, the absence of a fall in blood pressure after clonidine in the tetraplegic subjects suggests that the hypotensive action of clonidine in man is dependent on intact descending bulbospinal pathways and is mediated by withdrawal of sympathetic tone and provides direct evidence that some antihypertensive drugs may lower blood pressure in man by a direct action on the brain.     

Effects of combination therapy with captopril and nifedipine in severe or resistant hypertension

To assess the effect of potent vasodilator therapy in patients with severe or resistant hypertension, 10 patients underwent therapy with captopril and nifedipine alone and in combination. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate, and blood chemistry values were monitored for 4 weeks during captopril monotherapy and after 8 weeks during combination therapy with captopril and nifedipine. Compared with baseline, the BP decreased during captopril monotherapy (180 +/- 11/98 +/- 7 vs. 209 +/- 16/118 +/- 12 mm Hg; P less than 0.005). After the addition of nifedipine, the BP was further reduced (148 +/- 23/85 +/- 16 mm Hg), but there was no change in heart rate. In three patients not achieving the diastolic BP goal during combination therapy with dosing every 8 hours, automatic 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring demonstrated lack of antihypertensive control for only the last 2 to 3 hours of the dosing interval. These data demonstrate that combination therapy with captopril and nifedipine is effective in patients with severe hypertension, but frequent dosing intervals are necessary for adequate antihypertensive control.     

Comparative study of spirapril (quadropril) and amlodipine efficacy. Results of randomized trial in patients with mild to moderate arterial hypertension

AIM: To compare in the non-blind randomised parallel study the efficiency of quadropril and amlodipine in the treatment of mild to moderate arterial hypertension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 80 patients (57.6 +/- 1.0 years) were included in this study. The patients were randomised in two groups, 40 patients each. Patients of group 1 received monotherapy with quadropril, while those of group 2 were treated with amlodipine. The treatment duration was 8 weeks in both groups. Quadropril was given in a fixed dose of 6 mg once daily. The initial dose of amlodipine was 5 mg/day. In case of insufficient effect the dose was elevated to 10 mg/day. The efficacy was evaluated by changes in blood pressure (BP) measured at rest. Moreover, in 50 randomly chosen patients 24-h monitoring of BP was performed at the start and end of the treatment. RESULTS: In the quadropril group baseline systolic BP reached 158.6 +/- 2.1 mm Hg, diastolic BP--101.8 +/- 0.8 mm Hg, heart rate was 74.3 +/- 1.6 beats/min. In the amlodipine group baseline systolic BP was 159.9 +/- 2.4 mm Hg, diastolic BP--101.8 +/- 1.0 mm Hg, heart rate was 71.3 +/- 1.0 beats/min. Systolic BP decreased at the end of quadropril therapy to 138.5 +/- 2.2 mm Hg, diastolic BP to 88.1 +/- 1.4 mm Hg. No significant change of the heart rate was observed. Under 5 mg of amlodipine systolic BP decreased to 137.9 +/- 2.5 mm Hg and diastolic BP to 87.1 +/- 1.6 mm Hg. Heart rate increased to 73.3 +/- 2.2 beats/min. Under therapy with 10 mg amlodipine systolic BP decreased to 145.9 +/- 3.8 mm Hg, diastolic BP to 89.7 +/- 3.4 mm Hg. Heart rate increased to 77.3 +/- 4.0 beats/min (p < 0.01). The hypotensive effect of quadropril remained stable while the effect of amlodipine decreased by the 8th week of therapy (p < 0.01). Side effects were observed significantly more often in the amlodipine group, then in the quadropril group. The main quadropril side effect was cough. Side effects observed in the amlodipine group were edemas, tachycardia, weakness. CONCLUSION: Both quadropril and amlodipine demonstrated a comparable antihypertensive effect although in 11 of 40 patients in the amlodipine group a dose increase was necessary and tolerability of quadropril was better.     

Blood pressure elevation in a patient treated with salsalate

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of increased blood pressure associated with the use of salsalate in an elderly patient with no prior history of hypertension. CASE SUMMARY: A 78-year-old white man with no prior history of hypertension initiated salsalate therapy for low-back pain. Over the 15 months prior to the initiation of salsalate, his blood pressure averaged 127 +/- 7 mm Hg systolic and 84 +/- 6 mm Hg diastolic (mean +/- SD). After initiation of salsalate, he experienced significant elevations in blood pressure, which led to a preliminary diagnosis of hypertension. Blood pressure after initiation of salsalate averaged 150 +/- 13 mm Hg systolic and 95 +/- 5 mm Hg diastolic. No changes in medications or medication doses (with the exception of warfarin) occurred in the 18 months prior to or during salsalate therapy. His weight remained stable. A detailed review of his medical records and history revealed no other causes for these elevations in blood pressure. Salsalate therapy was discontinued and his blood pressure returned to normotensive levels (119 +/- 2 mm Hg systolic and 81 +/- 2 mm Hg diastolic). DISCUSSION: Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced elevations in blood pressure have been well documented in patients receiving antihypertensive medications. Due to its relative weak inhibition of cyclooxygenase and lack of published literature in hypertensive patients, salsalate is considered to have little or no effect on blood pressure. Our report documents a possible case of salsalate-induced hypertension in a previously normotensive elderly man. Observational studies suggest that NSAID use may increase the risk of developing hypertension in older patients. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should be aware of the possible effects of NSAIDs on blood pressure. Blood pressure monitoring following the initiation of salsalate may be warranted, particularly in older patients.     

Atenolol and chlorthalidone therapy for hypertension: a double-blind comparison

In a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of 31 patients with mild to moderate hypertension, we compared a placebo regimen with a regimen of atenolol and chlorthalidone (Tenoretic). The study, which lasted seven weeks, began with a single-blind two-week placebo lead-in period, followed by a four-week double-blind treatment phase, and concluded with a one-week single-blind placebo washout period. Of 24 patients included in the analysis of efficacy, seven received one Tenoretic 50 tablet per day (atenolol, 50 mg; chlorthalidone, 25 mg), nine received one Tenoretic 100 tablet per day (atenolol, 100 mg; chlorthalidone, 25 mg), and eight received placebo. Supine systolic/diastolic blood pressure (mean +/- SD) decreased from 154 +/- 15.2/102 +/- 4.6 mm Hg during the baseline period to 128 +/- 8.5/85 +/- 4.0 mm Hg during treatment in the group receiving Tenoretic 100, from 153 +/- 12.6/104 +/- 5.4 mm Hg to 137 +/- 4.5/91 +/- 4.4 mm Hg in the group receiving Tenoretic 50, and from 150 +/- 11.9/101 +/- 1.6 mm Hg to 145 +/- 11.6/93 +/- 5.1 mm Hg in the group receiving placebo. Reductions in systolic and diastolic blood pressures in the active treatment groups were significantly greater than the pressure reductions in the group receiving placebo (P less than .05 to .1). The combination of atenolol and chlorthalidone was well tolerated, and in no case was treatment discontinued because of side effects. This study showed that one tablet per day of either Tenoretic 50 or Tenoretic 100 is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.     

Effects of celiprolol on cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory stressors in patients with hypertension.

An ideal antihypertensive drug should reduce blood pressure not only at rest but also during stressful situations. To test whether this criterion is fulfilled by celiprolol, a new beta 1-selective adrenergic blocker drug with peripheral vasodilating activity, we examined the effects of its oral administration on cardiovascular reactivity to laboratory stressors in 18 patients with essential hypertension, according to a placebo-controlled crossover design. In the 12 patients classified as "responders," celiprolol significantly reduced resting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (p less than 0.05 for both). Compared with placebo, celiprolol induced a blood pressure reduction from 179.4 +/- 16.9/119.5 +/- 12.4 mm Hg to 160.7 +/- 12.6/109.4 +/- 3.1 mm Hg during mental arithmetic; from 200.9 +/- 20.7/139.2 +/- 11.9 mm Hg to 184.1 +/- 16.4/127.6 +/- 12.1 mm Hg during handgrip test; from 212.8 +/- 18.5/126.2 +/- 14.2 mm Hg to 185.9 +/- 18.2/117.1 +/- 15.2 mm Hg during cycle ergometry. Our data suggest that in the majority of treated patients celiprolol is effective in reducing blood pressure not only at rest but also during a variety of stressful events, thereby ameliorating the impact of recurring stress-induced increases of blood pressure on the cardiovascular system.     

Evaluation of isradipine (PN 200-110) in mild to moderate hypertension

The efficacy and safety of isradipine (PN 200-110), a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, was evaluated in 87 hypertensive patients in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized multicenter trial. After a 3-week single-blind washout phase, isradipine (or matching placebo) was administered for 4 weeks, beginning at 2.5 mg b.i.d. with increments of 2.5 mg b.i.d. at weekly intervals if supine diastolic blood pressure remained greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg. At the end of 1 week average supine blood pressure in the isradipine group (n = 45) fell from a baseline of 156 +/- 13/104 +/- 4 mm Hg to 146 +/- 14/97 +/- 7 mm Hg. By week 4 blood pressure was reduced by 19/14 mm Hg compared with 4/5 mm Hg in the placebo group (P less than 0.001 between groups). Supine and standing pulse rates were slightly increased initially with isradipine therapy but returned to baseline with increasing isradipine doses. Blood pressure responses at week 4 were good or excellent (supine diastolic less than or equal to 90 mm Hg or greater than or equal to 10 mm Hg decrease from baseline) in 87% of isradipine-treated patients and in 26% of placebo-treated patients. Headache, edema, abdominal discomfort, and constipation occurred slightly more frequently in isradipine-treated patients than in placebo-treated control subjects. The results indicate that isradipine, administered as monotherapy in doses of 2.5 to 10 mg b.i.d., is safe and effective in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.     

The effect of changes in perfusion pressure on uteroplacental blood flow in the pregnant rabbit.

The effect of perfusion pressure on uteroplacental blood flow was determined in pregnant rabbits utilizing the radioactive microsphere method. Control mean arterial pressure, 93 mm Hg +/- 2.6 SEM, was raised by carotid ligation to 109 +/- 4.1 mm Hg and then reduced with antihypertensive drugs to 74 +/- 1.3 mm Hg. Over this range of pressure there was no significant change in cardiac output, 605 +/- 36, 523 +/- 37, and 540 +/- 39 ml/min; or uteroplacental blood flow, 30 +/- 3.2, 27 +/- 5.2, and 29 +/- 4.5 ml/min, respectively. When prostaglandin synthesis was inhibited with either indomethacin or meclofenamate (2 mg/kg), uterine vascular resistance was higher but maintenance of uteroplacental flow occurred over a perfusion pressure of 89 +/- 6.7-115 +/- 9.3 mm Hg. With more severe hypotension induced with trimethaphan, control arterial pressure fell from 92 +/- 2.4 to 39 +/- 0.9 mm Hg, cardiac output fell from 514 +/- 17 to 407 +/- 22 ml/min (P less than 0.025) and uteroplacental blood flow fell from 6.1 +/- 0.9 to 2.5 +/- 0.9% of cardiac output (P less than 0.05), which represented an absolute fall from 32.4 +/- 5 to 10.6 +/- 3 ml/min (P less than 0.025). There was no significant change in renal blood flow expressed as percentage of cardiac output, 14.9 +/- 2 and 13 +/- 1.5%, or in absolute flow, 75 +/- 7.7 and 54 +/- 7 ml/min with trimethaphan-induced hypotension. These studies indicate that uteroplacental blood flow is maintained relatively constant over a range of perfusion pressure of 60-140 mm Hg in both normal and prostaglandin-inhibited pregnant rabbits. However, with reduction in pressure to 36-42 mm Hg, uteroplacental blood flow falls, expressed as a percentage of cardiac output and in absolute flow.     

Antihypertensive effects of parenteral nicardipine alone and in combination with captopril

We studied the safety and efficacy of intravenous nicardipine alone and in combination with oral captopril. Sixteen patients with essential hypertension received a single oral dose of captopril, 50 mg, to be certain that excessive hypotension would not occur. Nicardipine was given intravenously as a 2 mg bolus, followed by an infusion at a rate designed to lower the supine diastolic blood pressure at least 10 mm Hg; then oral captopril, 50 mg, or placebo was given. The next week, nicardipine was again infused, but the alternate oral treatment was given. Intravenous nicardipine reduced blood pressure from 156 +/- 15/101 +/- 5 mm Hg (mean arterial blood pressure 120 +/- 6 mm Hg) to 140 +/- 11/88 +/- 4 mm Hg (mean arterial blood pressure 105 +/- 5 mm Hg). When captopril was added to nicardipine, the mean arterial blood pressure fell an additional 8 mm Hg but the heart rate did not increase. The combination of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition and calcium channel blockage produces additive antihypertensive effects without additional reflex tachycardia.     

Prevalence of elevated blood pressure in 563,704 adult patients with stroke presenting to the ED in the United States

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of elevated blood pressure in adult patients with acute stroke in the United States (US). METHODS: Patients with stroke were classified by initial systolic blood pressure (SBP) into 4 categories using demographic, clinical, and treatment data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, the largest study of use and provision of emergency department (ED) services in the United States. We also compared the age-, sex-, and ethnicity-adjusted rates of elevated blood pressure strata, comparable with stages 1 and 2 hypertension in the US population. RESULTS: Of the 563704 patients with stroke evaluated, initial SBP was below 140 mm Hg in 173120 patients (31%), 140 to 184 mm Hg in 315207 (56%), 185 to 219 mm Hg in 74586 (13%), and 220 mm Hg or higher in 791 (0.1%). The mean time interval between presentation and evaluation was 40 +/- 55, 33 +/- 39, 25 +/- 27, and 5 +/- 1 minutes for increasing SBP strata (P = .009). A 3- and 8-fold higher rate of elevated blood pressure strata was observed in acute stroke than the existing rates of stages 1 and 2 hypertension in the US population. Labetalol and hydralazine were used in 6126 (1%) and 2262 (0.4%) patients, respectively. Thrombolytics were used in 1283 patients (0.4%), but only in those with SBP of 140 to 184 mm Hg. CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative large data set, elevated blood pressure was observed in over 60% of the patients presenting with stroke to the ED. Elevated blood pressure was associated with an earlier evaluation; however, the use of thrombolytics was restricted to patients with ischemic stroke with SBP below 185 mm Hg.     

Blood pressure load--a better determinant of hypertension

Noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring was used to evaluate the diagnosis of hypertension in 168 untreated patients with essential hypertension. On the basis of overall office blood pressure--the mean of 12 measurements, 2 in each of three positions (supine, sitting, and standing) on 2 consecutive days--133 patients were diagnosed as having hypertension (diastolic blood pressure of 90 mm Hg or higher) and 35 as having borderline hypertension (diastolic blood pressure of less than 90 mm Hg). The mean blood pressures for those with hypertension and borderline hypertension were 149/99 and 135/87 mm Hg, respectively. The mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure was 90 mm Hg or higher in 123 patients during awake hours and in 91 patients during 24 hours. The diastolic blood pressure loads (percentage of ambulatory diastolic blood pressures more than 90 mm Hg) in patients with hypertension and borderline hypertension, respectively, were 69% and 43% during awake hours and 59% and 35% during 24 hours. The systolic blood pressure loads (percentage of systolic readings more than 140 mm Hg) during awake and 24 hours were 56% and 48%, respectively, in patients with established hypertension and 31% and 26%, respectively, in those with borderline hypertension. Thus, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring and blood pressure load provide useful information for diagnosing hypertension.     

Evaluation of drug therapy for treatment of hypertensive urgencies in the emergency department

Oral nifedipine (N) and clonidine (C) are often used in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies; however, until recently, there were no comparative studies using the same patient population. The authors reviewed the records of hypertensive patients treated in the emergency department between October 1, 1987 and September 30, 1988. Selected patients had a diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of greater than 115 mm Hg without evidence of acute end organ damage. Patients were stratified into three treatment groups: N, C, and group 3 (G3). G3 received a variety of drug therapies but not exclusively N or C. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), DBP, mean arterial pressure (MAP), percent decrease in MAP (%MAP), time to lower blood pressure, admissions, and discharges were evaluated. Efficacy and safety were defined as reaching a DBP less than 110 mm Hg but %MAP of no greater than either 25% or 40%, respectively. Thirty-five N, 32 C, and 27 G3 patients were identified with no statistical difference between groups in race, gender, pretreatment SBP, DBP, or MAP. N, C, and G3 significantly reduced SBP, DBP, and MAP (P less than .01). Comparing N, C, and G3, no differences were observed in %MAP, admissions, discharges, efficacy, or safety. Time required to decrease blood pressure differed between all three groups (44 +/- 32 N v 77 +/- 57 C v 152 +/- 94 min G3) (p less than .05). These results indicate that N, C, and a variety of drug therapies are equally effective and safe in the treatment of hypertensive urgencies.     

Spirapril - a new long-acting ACE inhibitor: efficacy and safety in patients with arterial hypertension in combination with diabetes mellitus and impaired kidney function

AIM: To examine effectiveness and safety of quadropril. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Changes in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), levels of glucose, potassium and creatinine, creatinine clearance were studied in 120 patients (48 males and 72 females, mean age 60.6 +/- 0.7 years) with mild to moderate arterial hypertension (AH) with average duration 13.8 +/- 0.7 years. The patients were divided into 3 groups: with AH (n = 40), AH + noninsulindependent diabetes mellitus (DM) (n = 43), AH and nephropathy (n = 37). 8-week treatment was performed with a standard dose of 6 mg/day (1 tablet of quadropril). Control examinations were made 2, 4 and 8 weeks after the treatment. RESULTS: After 8 weeks of treatment a decrease in systolic blood pressure in AH group was 24.0 +/- 3.0 mm Hg and in diastolic blood pressure 16.3 +/- 1.3 mm Hg (P < 0.001). In the group with DM this decrease was 22.4 +/- 2.8 mm Hg and 15.7 +/- 1.4 mm Hg (p < 0.001), respectively. In the group with nephropathy this decrease was 26.4 +/- 2.4 and 16.5 +/- 1.3 mm Hg (p < 0.001), respectively. Heart rate changed significantly only in diabetics: from 75.1 +/- 1.7 to 72.9 +/- 1.3 beats/min. Biochemical parameters in the hypertensive and diabetic patients did not change significantly. In the nephropathy group there was a significant decrease in creatinine and increase in creatinine clearance. Their level of glucose and potassium changed insignificantly. CONCLUSION: The treatment with quadropril results in a significant decrease in blood pressure, does not influence parameters of carbohydrate metabolism, improves nitrogen eliminating function of the kidneys.