Effects of H1 antagonists on the cutaneous vascular response to histamine and bradykinin: a study using scanning laser Doppler imaging

Histamine plays an important part in the cutaneous weal and flare response which underlies many allergic skin conditions. It has a direct effect on the local vasculature to promote vasodilatation and increase microvascular permeability and may also initiate the more widely spread neurogenic flare. Quantification of these responses and studies of the mediator mechanisms underlying them have been limited by the lack of appropriate techniques to investigate them. To address this we have used two relatively new techniques, scanning laser Doppler imaging (LDI) and dermal microdialysis to measure changes in skin blood flow and the release of histamine within the weal and flare, following intradermal injection of histamine or bradykinin. These measurements have been made both in the absence and presence of the H₁ receptor blockers cetirizine and loratadine. Scanning LDI of the inflammatory response revealed marked differences in both the development and steady state responses to the intradermal injection of histamine (1–3 μmol/L) and bradykinin (1 μmol/L). The development of the flare and the weal response to both histamine and bradykinin was significantly reduced by cetirizine but not by loratadine. The histamine-induced flare area fell by 57 ± 4% (mean ± SEM, n = 10, P < 0.001) after cetirizine and the area of the weal fell by 73 ± 11% (P < 0.009). Bradykinin-induced inflammatory responses were similarly reduced by cetirizine, the weal by 60 ± 16% (P < 0.02) and the flare by 61 ± 4% (P < 0.005). Measurement of histamine concentration in skin using microdialysis, in six subjects, confirmed that histamine levels rose in the dialysate collected from the weal to 310 ± 16 nmol/L following injection of histamine. Histamine levels also rose following bradykinin injection in some subjects (mean 147 ± 46 nmol/L, range 18–336). Little increase in histamine concentration was seen in the dialysate from the flare following injection of either histamine or bradykinin. The histamine concentration in dialysate from unprovoked skin was 4.19 ± 0.75 nmol/L. These data reveal differences in the dermal responses to different mediators when assessed using scanning LDI. They confirm that histamine is released within the weal but not the flare response to the intradermal injection of both histamine and bradykinin and that its effects on the local vasculature to cause the oedematous weal and the axon reflex-mediated flare are significantly attenuated by the H₁ antagonist cetirizine and to a lesser extent by the H₁ antagonist loratadine.     

The effects of astemizole, cetirizine and loratadine on the time course of weal and flare reactions to histamine, codeine and antigen

An open cross-over study was performed to assess the effects of astemizole, cetirizine and loratadine on weal and flare reactions to intradermal histamine, codeine and house dust mite antigen. Percentage inhibition of weal area, flare area and weal volume was greatest for cetirizine, then astemizole and smallest for loratadine. Wealing due to mast-cell degranulation with either codeine or antigen was less inhibited by all three antihistamines than that due to histamine itself. Time-course studies revealed similarities between wealing provoked by codeine and histamine but different characteristics to that induced by antigen.     

Effects of histamine receptor antagonists on histamine-induced responses in human skin.

The effects of intradermally administered histamine H1- and H2-receptor antagonists on the cutaneous responses--redness, weal, flare and itch--induced by intradermal injection of histamine were studied in man. Weal and redness were studied after blockade of the axon reflex by local infiltration with lidocaine. All responses were significantly inhibited by the H1-receptor antagonist mepyramine. The H2-antagonists cimetidine and metiamide reduced flare and itch significantly but not to the same extenet as mepyramine and not in a clearly dose-related manner. The size of weal and redness was not significantly reduced by cimetidine. No further reduction of flare, itch or weal was obtained by adding metiamide or cimetidine to mepyramine. After blockade of the axon reflex with lidocaine the histamine-induced weals turned white at the centre. This blanching was more prominent when histamine was injected in combination with cimetidine. Substituting mepyramine for cimetidine resulted in small weals with an intense red colour. It is concluded that, apart from being engaged in the direct vasodilatory response to histamine, H2-receptors do not seem to be involved in the other cutaneous responses to histamine studied.     

Effect of cetirizine on cutaneous reactions to PAF, kallikrein and serum in patients with chronic urticaria

The effects of oral administration of the antihistamine cetirizine on the weal and flare caused by intradermal injection of platelet activating factor (PAF-acether), kallikrein, histamine and the patient's own serum were investigated in 10 patients with chronic urticaria. Cetirizine markedly reduced the weal and flare induced by all these agents as measured 12 min after the injections. The delayed reactions observed after injection of PAF, kallikrein and serum were also inhibited by cetirizine at 6 hours. In addition, reactions which were present 20 h after injection of the agent before administration of cetirizine were found to be inhibited at the same point in time after cetirizine treatment. These effects might explain the good inhibitory clinical effect of cetirizine on the patients' urticaria. No side-effects were noted during the treatment.     

Effects of capsaicin, bradykinin and prostaglandin E2 in the human skin

The actions and interactions of putative mediators of inflammation, such as substance P (SP), histamine, bradykinin and prostaglandins (PGE2) were studied in human skin. In addition, the effects of capsaicin were examined as it is known to release (and to deplete) SP and calcitonin gene-related peptide from C-fibres. The flare evoked by bradykinin was abolished by pretreatment with lignocaine (local anesthetic), compound 48/80 (mast-cell histamine liberator), mepyramine (H1-receptor antagonist) and indomethacin (cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor) but was unaffected by atropine and ketanserin (serotonin antagonist). The weal response was not reduced by any of the drugs. The flare evoked by capsaicin was abolished by lignocaine and indomethacin but was unaffected by compound 48/80, mepyramine, atropine and ketanserin. The weal response was reduced by indomethacin. The flare response to bradykinin seems to reflect the activation of C-fibres and associated mast cells, while the flare response to capsaicin seems to reflect the activation of C-fibres only. Repeated injections of capsaicin and bradykinin produced tachyphylaxis (and cross-tachyphylaxis) and greatly reduced the SP-evoked flare. Capsaicin produced tachyphylaxis also after treatment of the skin with a local anaesthetic, suggesting that it develops independently of C-fibre impulse flow. The tachyphylaxis produced by bradykinin and capsaicin seems to reflect the depletion of messenger peptides from the C-fibres. The flare response to SP following capsaicin- or bradykinin-induced desensitization gradually returned to normal after 5-8 weeks. The erythema evoked by PGE2 was reduced by 30% following pretreatment with lignocaine, mepyramine or compound 48/80.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mast cell mediators other than histamine induce pruritus in atopic dermatitis patients: a dermal microdialysis study

While histamine is the crucial mediator of pruritus in type 1 allergic reactions, its role in atopic dermatitis (AD) is unclear. In this study, the role of mast cell mediators in protein extravasation and pruritus was evaluated using intradermal microdialysis. The microdialysis capillaries were used to apply the mast cell degranulating substance compound 48/80 (C48/80; 0.05%) or histamine (0.01%) and also to deliver H1-blockers (cetirizine, 200 microg mL-1) in nine AD patients and nine controls. Large pore size membranes (3000 kDa) enabled simultaneous analysis of protein extravasation. Itch sensation was measured psychophysically and weal and flare reaction were evaluated planimetrically. Protein extravasation induced by histamine and C48/80 was significantly reduced in AD patients. Blockade of H1-receptors by cetirizine significantly reduced C48/80-induced protein extravasation in AD patients and controls to an identical level. C48/80-induced pruritus was abolished by cetirizine in controls, whereas pruritus in AD patients was unchanged after H1 blockade. We conclude that mast cell mediators others than histamine are involved in C48/80-induced pruritus in AD patients. Whether the reduced capacity of AD patients to induce protein extravasation is of pathophysiological relevance for pruritus remains to be established.     

The effect of UV irradiation and photochemotherapy (PUVA) on histamine weal and flare in human skin

It is recognized that ultraviolet light has a beneficial effect in various inflammatory disorders of the skin. We have used histamine weal and flare as a model testing the effect of ultraviolet light on vascular response. No difference in weal and flare reaction following intradermal injection of 0·01-10·0 μg of hisiamine was found between covered and exposed skin following UV radiation or photochemotherapy (PUVA).     

Effects of antihistamines on cutaneous reactions and influx of eosinophils after local injection of PAF, kallikrein, compound 48/80 and histamine in patients with chronic urticaria and healthy subjects.

The effects of one week's daily treatment with dexchlorpheniramine (3 + 3 mg x 2) and loratadine (10 mg x 2) on the cutaneous reactions to putative mediators of urticarial reactions were studied in healthy subjects and in patients with chronic urticaria. Biopsy specimens were taken from skin with delayed reactions and studied immunohistochemically for the presence of eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP). In healthy subjects both antihistamines significantly decreased the weal and flare induced by histamine and the histamine releaser compound 48/80. They also reduced the flare seen after injection of PAF (platelet activating factor) and kallikrein. In patients with chronic urticaria the delayed reactions to PAF and kallikrein were larger than in healthy subjects. The immediate flare seen after injection of histamine, 48/80 and PAF, and the delayed reaction to 48/80, were significantly decreased by treatment with loratadine. No correlation was found between the clinical response and test reactions. In the group of healthy subjects, eosinophils were increased in the skin of all subjects after intradermal injection of 100 micrograms of PAF and in 50% after 1 microgram of PAF, but no eosinophils were seen after injection of 1 ng of PAF. In patients with chronic urticaria the eosinophils were increased at all sites where 1 ng of PAF had been injected and also at a limited number of sites of injection of histamine, 48/80, kallikrein and saline. Treatment with the antihistamines had no effect on the influx of eosinophils in the skin.     

Histamine is released following aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy of human skin and mediates an aminolevulinic acid dose-related immediate inflammatory response

Acute skin inflammation occurs following topical aminolevulinic acid-photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT), but its nature and mediation are ill defined. As we observed an urticarial response, a potential role for histamine was explored. In 13 healthy volunteers, we assessed the time course and dose-response of the acute cutaneous response(s) to ALA-PDT, the impact of H(1) antihistamine blockade, and measured dermal histamine release. An ALA dose series was iontophoresed into ventral forearm skin and exposed to red light. All participants exhibited an immediate urticarial response, both wheal and flare correlating with log ALA dose. Subsequently, a dose-related erythema developed at treatment sites by 3 hours and persisted at 24 hours. H(1) blockade with oral cetirizine doubled the median minimal urticating dose of ALA and reduced the slope of dose-response for wheal and flare, whereas at the highest ALA dose, mean wheal and flare areas reduced by 68 and 60%, respectively. In contrast, cetirizine did not influence the 24 hour minimal phototoxic dose or erythema dose-response. Histamine release after ALA-PDT mirrored the urticarial response, levels peaking within 30 minutes and returning to baseline by 24 hours. Thus, two discrete acute inflammatory responses to topical ALA-PDT occur in human skin; histamine mediates the immediate response, but does not appear involved in the delayed phototoxicity.     

Skin reactivity to neuropeptides in atopic dermatitis

Adults with atopic dermatitis (AD), with respiratory atopy only and healthy non-atopic controls were given intradermal injections of substance P (SP), neurokinin A (NKA), neurotensin (NT), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and histamine into the normal-appearing skin on the back. The weal and flare responses were evaluated after 3, 5 and 15 min and the areas calculated using an automatic image analyser. With the three different concentrations used (1, 3 and 30 pmols) a statistically significant (P less than 0.05) reduction in both the weal and flare response to SP, NKA, NT and histamine and a reduced flare to CGRP was observed only in AD patients. Among those with AD there was no uniformity of response to the individual neuropeptide and in general the more severely affected showed a lower reactivity. Dose-response relationships were evaluated for SP and NT (10-320 pmols) in AD and healthy controls. In AD dose-response curves and time-course relationships were similar to controls, but at significantly reduced levels. The itch response to the neuropeptides and histamine was not different in atopics and controls. We suggest that this hyporesponsiveness in AD is the result of natural tachyphylaxis of the target structures (mast cells and blood vessels) and possibly due to a higher availability of neuropeptides in the skin or to a primary abnormal sensitivity of the blood vessels and mast cells to these peptides.     

Skin response to histamine. Reproducibility study of the dry skin prick test method and of the evaluation of microvascular changes with laser Doppler flowmetry.

The author presents original data obtained when using the dry skin prick test method to introduce histamine into the skin and by non-invasive evaluation of the skin blood flow changes at various sites/times during the development of the weal and flare reaction. The test method (1-second prick test duration and evaluation with laser Doppler flowmetry) generated reproducible responses when repeated in the same group of subjects (n = 10). At predefined fixed skin locations within the histamine-induced flare reaction area increased volumes of skin blood flow were recorded. When similar locations were explored after the control prick test, there were only minimal changes in skin blood flow. Pooled data recorded at four different sites located 1 cm from prick sites showed minimal variation and skin perfusion volumes were greater than basal values. The development of the histamine-dependent weal in its early phase (9th min) was associated with slightly smaller numbers of skin blood perfusion units, compared with recordings made during the 15th min. The control prick tests showed slightly higher levels at 9 min than at 15 min. This inverse relationship might be useful to quantify the histamine-specific changes in skin blood flow. These data also clearly illustrate that it is mandatory to state the precise place of measurement and time after challenge when reporting on instrumental evaluation of the skin response to histamine.     

Quantitative time course study of the skin response to histamine and the effect of H1 blockers. A 3-week crossover double-blind comparative trial of cetirizine and terfenadine

A controlled, randomized, double-blind, crossover study was performed in 10 healthy volunteers to compare changes of cutaneous blood flow values (CBFV) determined by laser Doppler flowmetry before and after intake of a capsule containing either 10 mg cetirizine or 60 mg terfenadine. After the determination of the initial response to the anti-H1 agents, drugs were taken daily (cetirizine 10 mg, terfenadine 120 mg) over a 3-week period and the cutaneous response to histamine and saline was evaluated weekly, exactly 4 h after the last drug intake. The following significant variations were observed (analysis of variance for repeated measurements, p less than 0.05): (1) there is a decrease of histamine-induced wheal and flare under antihistamines (anti-H1), cetirizine being more potent than terfenadine; (2) CBFV, measured on the usual flare area, i.e. at 1 cm of the site of agonist injection, decreased after drug intake. There was a gradual increase of the CBFV inhibition over the 3-week follow-up, cetirizine being more effective than terfenadine, and (3) at the site of agonist injection, reduction of the edematous wheal was associated with significant increases of CBFV after drug intake. This quantitative pharmacologic in vivo assay on the agonist action indicates that at lower doses, cetirizine has a significantly higher anti-H1 activity than terfenadine and that this effect is maintained over a 3-week period. There was no tachyphylaxis.     

Comparison of weal and flare responses to platelet activating factor (PAF) and histamine, and the ultrastructural effects of PAF in the skin of atopic and normal subjects

Weal volume and flare area responses to intradermal platelet activating factor (PAF) and histamine, both in the presence and absence of the protein carrier, human serum albumin (HSA), were measured in the skin of normal subjects, atopics without dermatitis, and in the normal-appearing skin of patients with atopic dermatitis. The ultrastructural effects of intradermal PAF were also studied in the same groups of subjects. Weal and flare dose-responses to PAF were enhanced by the presence of human serum albumin, HSA itself producing a significantly greater mean weal response in each group than lyso-PAF (P < 0.01). However, comparison of normal subjects, atopics without dermatitis and patients with atopic dermatitis, showed the differences in dose-response effects of PAF and histamine on weal volume and flare area to be nonsignificant. The cellular response to PAF in normal subjects and atopics consisted predominantly of neutrophil extravasation; eosinophils were noted in the normal-appearing skin of atopics and patients with atopic dermatitis 30 min and 4 h after injection. At an ultrastructural level PAF induced opening of endothelial gaps and extravasation of neutrophils in each group.     

Effects of loratadine and cetirizine on serum levels of neuropeptides in patients with chronic urticaria

H1‐receptor inhibiting drugs, namely loratadine and cetirizine, were frequently used in treatment of chronic urticaria. Urticarial weal and flare reactions, a neurogenic reflex due to neuropeptides, were reported to be more effectively inhibited by cetirizine than loratadine. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the effects of systemic loratadine and cetirizine treatments on serum levels of selected neuropeptides in chronic urticaria. Treatment groups of either systemic loratadine or cetirizine (10 mg/d), consisting of 16 and 22 patients, respectively, were included. Serum levels of stem cell factor (SCF), neuropeptide Y (NPY), calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP), nerve growth factor (NGF), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), and substance P (SP) were detected before and after one week of treatment with antihistamines. Serum NPY and VIP levels were significantly decreased when compared before and after treatment with antihistamines (P < 0.001 and P < 0.01, respectively). SCF and NGF values were also decreased after antihistamine treatment (P < 0.05). Post‐treatment levels of CGRP were significantly higher compared with pretreatment values, while no significant difference was detected between pre and post treatment levels of SP. Cetirizine was significantly more effective than loratadine on lowering serum levels of SCF among the other neuropeptides. Systemic loratadine and cetirizine treatments in patients with chronic urticaria precisely caused variations in serum levels of neuropeptides. The predominant effect of cetirizine compared to loratadine on reducing serum SCF levels might be explained with anti‐inflammatory properties of cetirizine.     

Effect of intradermal injection of methionine-enkephalin on human skin

Methionine-enkephalin (met-enk) detected in monocytes in psoriatic skin can modulate inflammatory processes and keratinocyte differentiation/proliferation in vitro. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of intradermal injection of met-enk on normal human skin and on the development of a delayed type skin hypersensitivity reaction. In 6 healthy volunteers, 50 microl of met-enk (16, 30, and 45 nmol) was injected once in the forearm and the reaction was evaluated clinically and by video-optical recording for 120 min. Compared to vehicle (0.9% saline), met-enk induced a time- and dose-dependent flare reaction, but no significant stimulation of a weal reaction. The flare reaction was maximal after 1 min and disappeared within 45 min. Pre-treatment with the antihistamine cetirizine reduced the flare reaction. Furthermore, the effect of met-enk on lymphocyte/monocyte infiltration and epidermal proliferation in normal skin and on a delayed type skin hypersensitivity reaction was assessed. Met-enk (45 nmol/ 50 microl) was injected at 0, 24 and 48 h. In normal skin, met-enk increased the number of dermal lymphocytes/monocytes (CD3/CD68 positive cells) and the degree of epidermal proliferation (MIBI-Ki67). In a delayed type hypersensitivity reaction induced by tuberculin (PPD), the degree of epidermal proliferation and the number of infiltrating lymphocytes/monocytes were reduced compared to PPD alone. Our study suggests that intradermal injection of met-enk in normal human skin induces an inflammatory reaction that may involve the release of histamine. In contrast, met-enk seems to down-regulate the development of a delayed type skin hypersensitivity reaction. These results may indicate that the direction of the effect of the opioid peptide met-enk on human skin depends on the rate of epidermal proliferation and the activity of immunocompetent cells.     

The intradermal effects of the H3 receptor agonist R α methylhistamine in human skin

We have investigated the possible existence of the H₃ histamine receptor in human skin with the highly selective ligands R α methylhistamine (RAMHA) (H₃ agonist) and thioperamide (H₃ antagonist). We compared the intradermal effects of RAMHA with histamine, and studied their potential modulation by the H₁ antagonist terfenadine, and H₂ antagonist cimetidine. The effects of RAMHA and thioperamide on codeine phosphate-, substance P- and histamine-induced weal and flare responses were also studied. RAMHA produced dose-related weal and flare responses that were approximately 10- and fivefold less, respectively, than responses to histamine. Flare responses to RAMHA were significantly inhibited by oral terfenadine ( P  < 0.05). Weal and flare responses to histamine after oral cimetidine showed much intersubject variation, and cimetidine did not significantly alter either RAMHA- or histamine-induced weal and flare responses. Codeine phosphate-, substance P- and histamine-induced responses were not significantly affected by concurrent administration of RAMHA. Thioperamide was not found to influence codeine phosphate-, substance P-, RAMHA- or histamine-induced effects. RAMHA induces vascular (weal and flare) responses in human skin, and these responses are partially inhibited by terfenadine. There is a trend for RAMHA to have an additive effect to the weal induced by substance P and histamine, although our results largely do not reach statistical significance. Thioperamide does not affect the vascular responses to RAMHA, codeine phosphate, histamine or substance P. We cannot conclude that the effects of RAMHA are induced by H₃ receptors on cutaneous endothelial or mast cells.     

Effects of acrivastine, loratadine and cetirizine on histamine-induced wheal and flare responses

It is accepted that studies evaluating histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions in the skin represent a simple and reliable method for demonstrating pharmacodynamic activity and pharmacokinetics of the H1-receptor antagonists. In this study, the effects of single oral doses of acrivastine (8 mg), loratadine (10 mg) and cetirizine (10 mg) on the histamine-induced wheal and flare reactions were compared in 60 healthy volunteers. The wheal and flare responses were produced by prick test using 1% histamine solution. Measurements were performed before the ingestion of antihistamines (baseline values) and afterwards at 15, 30, 90, 240, 360 min and 24 h. The values obtained for each antihistamine were compared with each other and with baseline values. Cetirizine was found to be superior to acrivastine and loratadine for the suppression of wheal and flare responses at 240, 360 min and 24 h (P < 0.05) and acrivastine was superior to the other two antihistamines for the suppression of flare response at 30 min (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that a single dose of cetirizine provides a more effective and long acting suppression on wheal and flare reactions in urticaria when compared to acrivastine and loratadine.     

Comparison of the actions of kallidin and bradykinin in the skin of normal and psoriatic subjects

With the recent development of selective drugs acting on the kinin system and the identification of a kallikrein-like enzyme from psoriatic blister fluid, there is now much interest in the possible role of kinins in psoriasis. We have examined the time-course of the inflammatory (weal and flare) responses to intradermal kallidin (lysbradykinin) and hradykinin in normal volunteers, and have compared the dose–response effect of these agents in normal volunteers and patients with psoriasis. Initially, normal subjects (n= 5) received coded intradermal injections of 50μl normal saline containing kallidin or bradykinin (0.1, 0.5, 1.0 and 5.0μg). Weal volume, weal area and flare area were calculated at 5, 15, 30 and 60min by measuring two perpendicular diameters and change in skinfold thickness. Weal and flare measurements were subsequently made at 15 and 5 min, respectively. Patients with psoriasis (n= 9) and normal subjects (n= 10) were given intradermal injections of kallidin (0.1 and 1.0μg) and bradykinin (0.1, 0.5 and 1.0 μg) in clinically normal forearm skin, using histamine and normal saline as controls. The dose–response effects of kallidin on weal and dare responses in human skin were established in the study and compared with those of bradykinin. There was wide inter-individual variability for both agents and, although mean responses to the highest doses of kallidin and bradykinin were decreased in psoriatic skin, no significant differences were found between the psoriatic and normal group for kallidin, bradykinin or histamine. Hence, there do not appear to be any obvious altered vascular responses to kallidin or bradykinin in patients with psoriasis, despite the fact that kinins may be generated in psoriatic tissue.     

Cutaneous reactions to substance P and histamine in atopic dermatitis

The flare and weal reactions to intradermal injections of histamine and the peptide substance P were measured in a group of patients with atopic dermatitis and compared to reactions in a non-atopic control group. There was no significant difference in the flare areas between the controls and atopics with either reagent. The weal volumes after injection of substance P and histamine were significantly larger in the atopic group. As substance P causes mast cell histamine release, the increased weal volumes produced by substance P in the atopics may be entirely due to the exaggerated atopic weal reaction to histamine.     

The autologous serum skin test: a screening test for autoantibodies in chronic idiopathic urticaria

One-third of patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU) have circulating functional autoantibodies against the high affinity IgE receptor FcepsilonRI, or IgE. The intradermal injection of autologous serum causes a weal and flare reaction in many patients with CIU, and this reaction forms the basis of the autologous serum skin test (ASST). We have determined the parameters of the ASST which define the optimal sensitivity and specificity for the identification of patients with autoantibodies. Two physicians (R.A. S. and C.E.H.G.) performed ASSTs in a total of 155 patients with CIU, 40 healthy control subjects, 15 patients with dermographism, nine with cholinergic urticaria and 10 with atopic eczema. Patients were classified as having functional autoantibodies by demonstrating in vitro serum-evoked histamine release from the basophils of two healthy donors. There were significant differences (P < 0.001) in the mean weal diameter, weal volume, weal redness and flare area of the intradermal serum-induced cutaneous responses at 30 min between patients with CIU with autoantibodies and either those without autoantibodies or control subjects. The optimum combined sensitivity and specificity of the ASST was obtained if a positive test was defined as a red serum-induced weal with a diameter of >/= 1.5 mm than the saline-induced response at 30 min. For R.A.S. and C.E.H.G., the ASST sensitivity was 65% and 71% and specificity was 81% and 78%, respectively. Using these criteria, the following subjects had positive ASSTs: none of 15 dermographics, none of 10 atopics, one of nine cholinergics and one of 40 controls.