Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Lamotrigine in Treatment-Resistant Generalised Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : Lamotrigine (LTG) is recognised as effective add-on therapy for focal epilepsies, but this is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study in treatmentresistant generalised epilepsy.
Methods: The study consisted of 2 × 8-week treatment periods followed by a 4-week washout period. Patients received doses of either 75 or 150 mg daily, depending on their concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Long-term continuation was offered at the end of the study with open-label LTG.
Results: Five centres in Australia recruited 26 patients who were having absence, myoclonic, or generalized tonic-clonic seizures or a combination of these. Twenty-two patients completed the study. There was a significant reduction in frequency of both tonic-clonic and absence seizure types with LTG. A 250% decrease in seizures was observed for tonic-clonic seizures in 50% of cases and for absence seizures in 33% of evaluable cases. Rash was the only adverse effect causing discontinuation. Twenty-three of 26 opted for open-label LTG, with 20 still receiving LTG for a mean of 26 months. In these 20, 80% had 250% seizure reduction and five (25%) were seizure free.
Conclusions: This study shows that LTG is effective add-on therapy in patients with refractory generalised epilepsies. Statistically significant reduction in seizures in both absence and tonic-clonic seizure types was seen even with low doses of LTG.     

Open, Double-Blind and Long-Term Study of Vigabatrin in Chronic Epilepsy

We performed an open, double-blind, and long-term study of vigabatrin (gamma-vinyl-GABA, GVG) in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy who were receiving only one or at most two standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The novel design included a parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase that minimized the number of patients receiving placebo and allowed determination of the optimum dose of GVG for each patient before initiation of the double-blind phase. The study was divided into four phases. The first phase was a 6-week period of baseline observation. In the second phase, GVG was added openly to previous AEDs for 8 weeks. During the first 2 weeks of this phase, the dose of GVG was increased weekly and then, in the absence of adverse effects, was held constant for the next 6 weeks. At the end of this open phase, seizure frequency during the 6 weeks of constant treatment was compared with the baseline seizure frequency for each patient. Patients who experienced reduction greater than 50% in the frequency of any seizure type during the open phase were defined as responders. These responders were then entered into the third and double-blind phase, in which they were randomly allocated wither to continue active GVG treatment or placebo for 8 weeks. Thirty-three patients entered the study; 31 of 33 patients completed the initial open phase. Twenty patients achieved a reduction greater than or equal to 50% in the frequency of one or more seizure types and were eligible for the double-blind phase; 10 were randomized to continue GVG and 10 were randomized to placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Lamotrigine: A Review of Antiepileptic Efficacy

Summary: Lamotrigine (LTG) is a chemically novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) that blocks voltage-sensitive sodium channels, leading to inhibition of neurotransmitter release, principally glutamate. LTG is active in a wide range of pharmacologic models of epilepsy, demonstrating a potency and duration of action generally superior to currently available AEDs. Preliminary evidence of efficacy was provided by single-dose studies showing effects on reducing interictal spike activity and photoconvulsive response. A total of eight randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trials have established the efficacy of LTG in patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Literature reports suggest LTG also is effective in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy, including absence seizures, and in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Other reports suggest that LTG is useful in the pediatric population, and an interim report of an open monotherapy trial suggests that the efficacy of LTG was comparable to that of carbamazepine (CBZ) but the adverse experiences leading to discontinuation were less frequent.     

Lamictal (Lamotrigine) Monotherapy for Typical Absence Seizures in Children

PURPOSE: To investigate whether lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy is effective and safe for newly diagnosed typical absence seizures in children and adolescents (aged 3-15 years, n = 45). METHODS: A "responder-enriched" study design was used: open-label dose escalation was followed by placebo-controlled, double-blind testing of LTG. Conventional hyperventilation testing with EEG recording was used to confirm diagnoses and assess treatment success defined as complete freedom from seizures. Ambulatory 24-h EEG recordings provided supporting evidence of effectiveness. Safety was assessed by evaluation of adverse events, vital signs, and physical, neurologic, and laboratory examinations. Plasma samples were taken to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of LTG. RESULTS: During initial open-label dose escalation, 71.4% of patients (intent-to-treat) or 82% (per protocol analysis) became seizure free; individual patients responded at doses ranging from 2 to 15 mg/kg/day (median, 5.0). In the placebo-controlled, double-blind phase of the study, statistically significantly more patients remained seizure free when treated with LTG (62%) than with placebo (21%; p < 0.02; for the intent-to-treat analysis). Mean plasma concentrations of LTG, were linearly related to dose, although there was substantial interindividual variation. No patients were withdrawn from the study for any safety-related reason. CONCLUSIONS: LTG monotherapy is effective for typical absence seizures in children and is generally well tolerated.     

Lamotrigine Adjunctive Therapy in Childhood Epileptic Encephalopathy (the Lennox Gastaut Syndrome)

Summary: Purpose : We assessed efficacy and safety of adjunctive lamotrigine (LTG) therapy in patients with the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS).
Methods : The study was a single-center, retrospective chart review of open-label adjunctive LTG therapy in patients with LGS. Initial LTG dose and titration was dependent on concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Efficacy was based on the change in seizure frequency between the initiation of LTG therapy and December 1, 1995 (or LTG discontinuation). Seizure diaries were used to count patient seizures. A secondary evaluation of efficacy was a parental or guardian assessment of the patient's global status. The evaluation of safety involved chart review for treatment-emergent adverse events (AE).
Results : Data from 16 LGS patients were analyzed. Fifty-three percent (8 of 15) had a >50% reduction in seizure frequency with LTG adjunctive therapy. Tonic, atonic, generalized tonic-clonic (GTCS), and atypical absence seizure frequency but not myoclonic seizure frequency decreased significantly during LTG therapy. Fifty-three percent of the patient's parents (8 of 15) reported that their child's quality of life (QOL) was much or very much improved during the study. The major treatment-emergent AE were infection (50%, 8 of 16) and sleep disturbance (19%, 3 of 16). A rash was noted in 13% (2 of 16) of the patients and resulted in LTG discontinuation in 1. No clinically significant changes were noted in neurologic examination or laboratory tests during the study.
Conclusions : Our results indicate that LTG adjunctive therapy is effective and well tolerated in patients with LGS.     

Role of Vigabatrin and Lamotrigine in Treatment of Childhood Epileptic Syndromes

Summary: Purpose: Vigabatrin (VGB) and lamotrigine (LTG) are two new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with different mechanisms of action for treatment of refractory epilepsies. Previous reports have indicated efficacy of both drugs in a number of epileptic syndromes.
Methods: We compared these new AEDs drugs to determine their respective efficacy against different types of epileptic syndrome and to develop a rational approach to their use. We reviewed the charts of 105 children, with partial and generalized epilepsies.
Results: VGB was to be significantly more effective in children with partial epilepsies, and LTG was more effective in those with generalized epilepsies.
Conclusions: VGB and LTG have different therapeutic profiles. Combination treatment with the two drugs may represent rational polytherapy for patients with epilepsy resistant to treatment with either drug alone or as add-on to other AED treatment.     

Controlled Trial of Lamotrigine (Lamictar) for Refractory Partial Seizures

The antiepileptic effect of lamotrigine (LTG) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 24 adult patients with refractory partial seizures. LTG or placebo was added to existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The dose of LTG varied from 75 to 400 mg daily. Three patients did not complete the trial. One was withdrawn from the trial with ataxia, tiredness, dyspnea, and diplopia while receiving LTG and died 18 days later of invasive carcinoma involving the liver. A second patient was withdrawn during baseline for contravening admission criteria, and a third received LTG in error during both treatment periods. Twenty-one patients (12 men and 9 women) completed the trial. An analysis of seizure counts in the 12-week treatment period with LTG showed a statistically significant reduction in seizures as compared with placebo for total seizures (p less than 0.002), partial seizures (p less than 0.002), and secondarily generalized seizures (p less than 0.05). The analysis of total seizure days showed a significant reduction during LTG treatment (p less than 0.002). There were no statistically significant changes in plasma concentrations of phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), primidone (PRM), or phenobarbital (PB) between the two treatment periods. The most common adverse events reported during the trial were diplopia, drowsiness, tiredness, ataxia, and headache, but although these were more frequent during LTG treatment, the differences from placebo were not statistically significant. No hematological or biochemical changes were noted.     

Preliminary Observations on Topiramate in Pediatric Epilepsies

Summary: Preliminary results of studies of topiramate (TPM) in children are now available. In a pharmacokinetic study among 18 male and female children, target daily dosages of up to 9 mg/kg/day were evaluated. TPM pharmacokinetics in children were linear. Mean TPM oral clearance (CL/F) was 44–54% higher in children [depending on concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs)] compared with historical data from adults, and steady-state plasma TPM concentrations for the same mg/kg dose were 33% lower in children compared with historical adult data. In a long-term, open-label pilot study of adjunctive TPM therapy in 18 patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, six of the eight patients (75%) still receiving TPM report a greater than 50% reduction in total seizures, with the best results observed in tonic-atonic, atypical absence, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Subsequent large double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive TPM therapy in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and refractory partial-onset pediatric epilepsy are ongoing, with high percentages of enrolled patients in both studies completing double-blind treatment and entering long-term TPM open extension trials. A small TPM monotherapy substitution trial in children with well controlled partial onset seizures showed that TPM monotherapeutic substitution can be achieved successfully with an acceptable amount of adverse experiences with a weekly increase of 1 mg/kg/day to a maximal dose of 3 mg/kg/day. These preliminary results suggest that TPM may be a useful new AED in pediatric patients with a variety of seizure disorders.     

The use of lamotrigine, vigabatrin and gabapentin as add-on therapy in intractable epilepsy of childhood.

PURPOSE: Lamotrigine (LTG), vigabatrin (VGB) and gabapentin (GBP) are three anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) used in the treatment of children with epilepsy for which long-term retention rates are not currently well known. This study examines the efficacy, long-term survival and adverse event profile of these three agents used as add-on therapy in children with refractory epilepsy over a 10-year period. METHODS: Three separate audits were conducted between February 1996 and September 2000. All children studied had epilepsy refractory to other AEDs. Efficacy was confirmed if a patient became seizure free or achieved >50% reduction in seizure frequency for 6 months or more after starting therapy. Adverse events and patient survival for each drug were recorded at the end of the study period. RESULTS: Between September 1990 and February 1996, 132 children received LTG, 80 VGB and 39 GBP. At the 10-year follow-up audit, 33% of the children on LTG had a sustained beneficial effect on their seizure frequency in contrast to 19% for VGB and 15% for GBP. No significant difference in efficacy was found in children with partial seizures. Children with epileptic encephalopathy (EE) including myoclonic-astatic epilepsy and Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) achieved a more favorable response to LTG. The main reasons for drug withdrawal were lack of efficacy for VGB, apparent worsening of seizures for GBP and the development of a rash for LTG. CONCLUSIONS: Lamotrigine is a useful add-on therapy in treating children with epilepsy. It has a low adverse event profile and a sustained beneficial effect in children with intractable epilepsy.     

Adjunctive therapy with oxcarbazepine in children with partial seizures. The Oxcarbazepine Pediatric Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as adjunctive therapy in children with inadequately controlled partial seizures on one or two concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). BACKGROUND: OXC has shown antiepileptic activity in several comparative monotherapy trials in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy, and in a placebo-controlled monotherapy trial in hospitalized patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. DESIGN: A total of 267 patients were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of three phases: 1) a 56-day baseline phase (patients maintained on their current AEDs); 2) a 112-day double-blind treatment phase (patients received either OXC 30-46 mg/kg/day orally or placebo); and 3) an open-label extension phase. Data are reported only from the double-blind treatment phase; the open-label extension phase is ongoing. METHODS: Children (3 to 17 years old) with inadequately controlled partial seizures (simple, complex, and partial seizures evolving to secondarily generalized seizures) were enrolled. RESULTS: Patients treated with OXC experienced a significantly greater median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency than patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0001; 35% versus 9%, respectively). Forty-one percent of patients treated with OXC experienced a > or =50% reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency per 28 days compared with 22% of patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0005). Ninety-one percent of the group treated with OXC and 82% of the group treated with placebo reported > or =1 adverse event; vomiting, somnolence, dizziness, and nausea occurred more frequently (twofold or greater) in the group treated with OXC. CONCLUSION: OXC adjunctive therapy administered in a dose range of 6 to 51 mg/kg/day (median 31.4 mg/kg/day) is safe, effective, and well tolerated in children with partial seizures.     

A double-blind, randomized trial of topiramate in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Topiramate YL Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of topiramate as adjunctive therapy for Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BACKGROUND: Conventional antiepileptic drugs are frequently ineffective against multiple-seizure types of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients >1 year to <30 years of age, with slow spike-and-wave patterns on EEG, seizure types including drop attacks, and either a history of or active atypical absence seizures, were assigned to an 11-week, double-blind treatment phase with either topiramate or placebo. Topiramate was titrated to target doses of approximately 6 mg/kg/d. RESULTS: For drop attacks, the most severe seizures associated with this syndrome, the median percentage reduction from baseline in average monthly seizure rate was 14.8% for the topiramate group and -5.1% (an increase) for the placebo group (p = 0.041). Topiramate-treated patients demonstrated greater improvement in seizure severity than did placebo-treated patients based on parental global evaluations (p = 0.037). The percentage of patients with a > or = 50% reduction from baseline in major seizures (drop attacks and tonic-clonic seizures) was greater in the topiramate group (15/46 or 33%) than in the control group (4/50 or 8%; p = 0.002). The most common adverse events in both groups were CNS related; there were no discontinuations from topiramate therapy due to adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Topiramate adjunctive therapy was effective in reducing the number of drop attacks and major motor seizures and in improving seizure severity as determined by parental global evaluation.     

Tiagabine: Efficacy and Safety in Adjunctive Treatment of Partial Seizures

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of tiagabine (TGB), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), as add-on therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: This response-dependent study used an open-label screening phase (in which patients were titrated to their optimal TGB dose, < or =64 mg/day) followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover phase. Initial eligibility criteria included (a) seizures inadequately controlled by existing AEDs, and (b) six or more partial seizures during an 8-week baseline period. Patients showing benefit from TGB (> or =25% reduction in total seizure rate relative to baseline) were eligible for randomization into the double-blind phase, which comprised two 7-week assessment periods separated by a 3-week crossover period. RESULTS: Forty-four (50%) of the 88 enrolled patients entered the double-blind phase of the study during which there were significant reductions compared with placebo in all partial (p < 0.01), complex partial (p < 0.001), and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizure rates (p < 0.05). Thirty-three percent of patients experienced a reduction of > or =50% in the all partial seizure rate. Eight (22%) patients receiving TGB during the double-blind phase reported adverse events, of which dizziness and incoordination were the most frequent. Three patients withdrew from treatment during the double-blind phase because of adverse events; two during treatment with TGB and one during treatment with placebo. TGB did not affect plasma concentrations of other coadministered AEDs. CONCLUSIONS: TGB was significantly better than placebo in terms of seizure rate reduction and was generally well-tolerated in patients with difficult to control seizures.     

Human Safety of Lamotrigine

Summary: The clinical safety of lamotrigine (LTG), assessed in four completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials and an interim analysis of 27 12-month open studies, is discussed. LTG was added to existing anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) of adult patients with refractory epilepsy, using a twice-daily regimen. In the pooled data from the four double-blind studies ( n = 92), the incidence of adverse experiences with LTG and placebo did not differ significantly. Two patients were withdrawn on LTG due to adverse experiences (one rash, one nausea and vomiting). In the open studies (pooled data; n = 572) the most commonly reported adverse experiences were dizziness, diplopia, somnolence, headache, ataxia, and asthenia (10–14% incidence). Forty-nine patients (8.6%) were withdrawn with adverse events, most commonly for rash (2.3%). No patients were withdrawn from any of the studies with physical, neurological, or ECG abnormalities thought attributable to LTG treatment. Laboratory measures, vital signs, and weight did not show any consistent changes of clinical significance, and no significant changes in plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs after the addition of LTG were observed.     

Outcomes of Add-on Treatment with Lamotrigine in Partial Epilepsy

Summary: The need for new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and more sensitive methods of assessing their efficacy is well recognized. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG), a potential new AED and to develop and test new outcome measures. A health-related quality of life (HRQL) model was developed which contains previously validated measures of anxiety, depression, happiness, overall mood, self-esteem, and mastery and a specifically designed seizure severity scale with patient- and caregiver-based components. This HRQL model was used in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, cross-over study of LTG in 81 patients with refractory partial seizures. Seizure frequency was the primary measure and seizure severity and the HRQL were secondary measures of efficacy. The reduction in seizure frequency with LTG, relative to placebo, was 29.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 17.8%, 39.9%] for total seizure count, 33.4% (95% CI 14.8%, 47.9%) for complex partial seizures (CPS) and 20.3% (95% CI 0.3%, 36.2%) for secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). However, although 41 patients elected to continue with LTG, only 11 experienced at least 50% reduction in total seizures, indicating that other factors influenced their decision. The score with LTG, relative to placebo, was significantly lower for the ictal (p = 0.017) and caregivers (p = 0.035) subscales of the seizure severity scale and significantly higher for happiness (p = 0.003) and mastery (p = 0.003). Simple correlation and multiple-regression analyses indicate that the effects on seizure frequency, seizure severity, and psychological variables appear to be independent of each other. This study indicates that LTG is effective in reducing seizure frequency and has additional favorable effects on seizure severity, mood, and perceived internal control. Some of the scales used indicate the potential of secondary measures of efficacy to enhance the sensitivity of trials of new AEDs.     

Rufinamide for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults and adolescents: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Purpose:   To evaluate efficacy and safety of adjunctive treatment with rufinamide 1600 mg twice daily in subjects aged ≥16 years with refractory partial seizures.
Methods:   This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial included an 8-week baseline phase and a 13-week double-blind phase. Treatment was initiated with rufinamide 400 mg twice daily or placebo; rufinamide was titrated to 1600 mg twice daily. Percentage change in partial seizure frequency was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included total partial seizure frequency and the percentage of subjects experiencing a ≥50% reduction in partial seizure frequency.
Results:   Three hundred thirteen subjects were randomized; 156 subjects received rufinamide and 157 received placebo. Rufinamide-treated subjects experienced a 20.4% median reduction in partial seizure frequency relative to baseline, while placebo-treated subjects had an increase of 1.6% (p = 0.02). Exclusion of subjects taking carbamazepine in a post hoc analysis resulted in a reduction of 29.2% versus 0.7% in the placebo group (p = 0.05), whereas the treatment difference in subjects taking carbamazepine was not significant. Of rufinamide-treated subjects, 28.2% experienced a ≥50% decrease in partial seizure frequency versus 18.6% of placebo-treated subjects (p = 0.04). The most common adverse events associated with rufinamide treatment were dizziness, nausea, diplopia, and ataxia; they occurred primarily during the titration phase.
Discussion:   Adjunctive therapy with rufinamide 3200 mg/day compared with matching placebo demonstrated efficacy and was generally well tolerated in adults with partial seizures. Further study of this agent in adults with partial seizures taking a range of baseline AEDs is warranted.     

Topiramate as Adjunctive Therapy in Refractory Partial Epilepsy: Pooled Analysis of Data from Five Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trials

Summary: A pooled analysis of data from five similarly designed double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of topiramate (TPM) as add-on therapy in patients with partial epilepsy was performed. The pooled analysis allowed evaluation of efficacy end points and response to treatment for a number of study subgroups not statistically evaluable in the individual study analyses due to limited sample sizes. The five trials included 534 patients, 360 who received TPM at target dosages of 200-1,000 mg daily and 174 who received placebo. In the intent-to-treat pooled analysis, TPM was significantly ( p ≤ 0.01) superior to placebo in reducing total seizures by ≥ 75% or by 100%. When seizure types were evaluated independently, TPM significantly ( p ≤ 0.001) reduced the frequency of simple partial, complex partial, and secondarily generalized seizures. TPM was significantly ( p ≤ 0.001) better than placebo regardless of gender, patient age, baseline seizure rate, and concomitant AEDs. The efficacy of TPM in partial epilepsy is consistent across efficacy end points and across strata defined by study population characteristics.     

Allopurinol as Add-on Therapy in Refractory Epilepsy: A Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Randomized Study Italy, on his retirement.

Summary: The antiepileptic effect of allopurinol was assessed in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial in 84 patients with epileptic seizures refractory to standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). During a retrospective baseline period, patients experienced at least four seizures of any type per month. The effects of allopurinol and matching placebo were examined for 4-month periods. Allopurinol dosage was 150 mg daily for children weighing <20 kg and 300 mg daily for other patients. Efficacy analysis based on the Wilcoxon rank-sum test was conducted for the 80 patients who completed the study. No significant period effect or treatment-period interaction was noted. Allopurinol significantly reduced total seizures (p = 0.00S), and secondarily generalized seizures (p = 0.0015). Median seizure reduction for total seizures was 10.5 and 27.9% for secondarily generalized seizures. Subjective preferences by clinicians evaluated blindly significantly favored allopurinol. No significant change occurred in the plasma concentration of concomitant AEDs between treatment periods, but serum urate decreased by 32% during allopurinol treatment. No clinically relevant side effects or changes in routine laboratory clinical chemistry or hematology were ascribed to allopurinol.     

Lamotrigine Therapy for Partial Seizures: A Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Cross-Over Trial

Summary: The efficacy and safety of lamotrigine (LTG), a new antiepileptic drug (AED), were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study of 98 patients with refractory partial seizures. Each treatment period lasted 14 weeks. Most patients were titrated to a LTG maintenance dose of 400 mglday. Seizure frequency with LTG decreased by ≥50%, as compared with placebo, in one fifth of patients. Overall median seizure frequency decreased by 25% with LTG as compared with placebo (p < 0.001). With LTG, the number of seizure days decreased by 18% as compared with placebo (p < 0.01), and investigator global evaluation of overall patient clinical status favored LTG by 2: 1 (p = 0.013). Plasma LTG concentrations appeared to be linearly related to dosage. LTG had no clinically important effects on the plasma concentrations of concomitant AEds. Adverse experiences were generally minor and most frequently were CNS-related (e.g., ataxia, dizziness, diplopia, headache). Most were transient and resolved without discontinuing treatment. Five patients withdrew as a result of adverse experiences while receiving LTG, including 3 patients with rash. One placebo patient was also withdrawn because of rash. The addition of twice-daily LTG to an existing AED regimen was safe, effective, and well tolerated in these medically refractory partial seizure patients.     

Trial of antiepilepsirine (AES) in children with epilepsy

Antieplepsirine (AES) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) which was originally extracted from a Chinese folk remedy, and is now chemically characterized and synthesized. Its chemical structure is different from those of other available AEDs. Animal experiments involving AES demonstrated significant antiepileptic activity. Only a few clinical studies of AES with open trial have been resorted, none of which were on children. A 6.5 month, add-on, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, cross-over study on AES (10 mg/kg per day) was conducted on epileptic children (aged 1-14 years) refractory to treatment with standard AEDs. The seizure frequency was recorded, and the blood levels of AES and other co-medicated AEDs (phenobarbital, phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproate) were determined. Although not planned, patients or parents were allowed to refuse to cross-over to the alternate therapy. The results were compared to the children who crossed-over as well as for the entire group during the first 3 months of randomized treatment. A total of 58 children entered, but only 34/58 children completed the cross-over study. The 24 children whose parents refused to let them be crossed-over continued the original study treatment (AES or placebo) for the entire 6 months. There was no statistically significant difference in seizure control when the entire group of 58 patients was compared to a parallel study group for the first 3 months of therapy (P = 0.178). There was a significant difference (P<0.01) in seizure control between AES and placebo treatment for the 34 patients who completed the entire cross-over study. No significant changes were seen in the blood level of other AEDs, and no serious acute side effects were observed. The results of the present study indicate the efficacy of AES for epileptic children with refractory seizures.