N-acetylcysteine for the prevention of kidney injury in abdominal aortic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

In this prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial we studied the effects of IV N-acetylcysteine for prevention of renal injury in patients undergoing abdominal aortic surgery. Seventy patients without previously documented renal dysfunction were randomly allocated to receive either N-acetylcysteine (150 mg/kg mixed in 250 mL of 5% dextrose infused in 20 min, followed by an infusion of 150 mg/kg in 250 mL of 5% dextrose over 24 h) or placebo. The infusion was started after the induction of anesthesia. The primary outcome measure was renal injury as measured by the increases in urinary N-acetyl-beta-d-glucosaminidase (NAG)/creatinine ratio (indicator of renal tubular injury) and urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (indicator of glomerular injury). Renal function was assessed by measuring plasma creatinine and serum cystatin C concentrations. The urinary NAG/creatinine ratio increased significantly from baseline to before crossclamp and remained increased on day 5 in both groups. The urinary albumin/creatinine ratio increased significantly from baseline to 6 h after declamping in the N-acetylcysteine group. However, the changes in the NAG/creatinine ratio and the albumin/creatinine ratio were not significantly different between the two groups. Plasma creatinine and serum cystatin C values remained unchanged during the study period in both groups. In conclusion, N-acetylcysteine did not offer any significant protection from renal injury during elective aortic operation in patients with normal preoperative renal function, and some degree of tubular injury seems to occur before aortic crossclamp.     

Improved estimation of glomerular filtration rate by serum cystatin C in preventing contrast induced nephropathy by N-acetylcysteine or zinc--preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Prevention of contrast media (CM) induced nephropathy (CIN) by prophylaxis (e.g. N-acetylcysteine; NAC) is controversially discussed. Up to now, assessment of kidney function has been based on measurements of serum creatinine, although this biomarker has several limitations. We investigated NAC and zinc (Zn) for the prevention of CIN by monitoring creatinine and cystatin C. METHODS: In a prospective, placebo-controlled, double blind trial, patients with moderately impaired kidney function receiving low-osmolar, non-ionic CM were randomly assigned to an oral treatment for 2 days with 1.2 g/day of NAC (n = 19), for 1 day with 60 mg/day of Zn (n = 18) or placebo (n = 17). All patients received peri-procedurally 1 ml/kg/h of 0.45% saline for 24 h. At baseline, prior to exposure of CM, 2 and 6 days after CM, creatinine and cystatin C were measured. RESULTS: There was no difference in the incidence of CIN, but a significant drop in creatinine (P < 0.05) was observed in all patients during volume expansion. Creatinine showed no increase after CM and it was normalized to the baseline values in all groups at the study end. In contrast, 2 days after CM there was a significant rise in cystatin C in the Zn (P = 0.012) and the placebo (P = 0.041) group, whereas NAC prevented this deterioration of kidney function. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C seems to reflect CM-induced changes in kidney function better than creatinine. NAC and Zn have no effect in preventing CIN by the standard definition, but based on cystatin C we can confirm a preventive effect of NAC. It appears mandatory to assess kidney function by cystatin C in CIN intervention trials, because relying on creatinine can be misleading.     

The value of N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of radiocontrast agent-induced nephropathy seems questionable

Prevention of contrast agent-induced nephropathy is of crucial importance for a number of diagnostic studies. N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) was recently reported to decrease serum creatinine levels in this setting, and its administration before radiocontrast medium administration has been widely recommended. The objective of this prospective study was to investigate whether there are effects of NAC on serum creatinine levels that are independent of alterations in GFR. Volunteers with normal renal function who did not receive radiocontrast medium were studied. Fifty healthy volunteers completed the study protocol. NAC was administered orally at a dose of 600 mg every 12 h, for a total of four doses. Surrogate markers of renal function, such as serum creatinine, urea, albumin, and cystatin C levels, were measured and estimated GFR (eGFR) was assessed immediately before the administration of NAC and 4 and 48 h after the last dose. There was a significant decrease in the mean serum creatinine concentration (P < 0.05) and a significant increase in the eGFR (P < 0.02) 4 h after the last dose of NAC. The cystatin C concentrations did not change significantly. In several studies, a protective effect of NAC on renal function after radiocontrast medium administration has been postulated. This is the first study to demonstrate an effect of NAC on creatinine levels and eGFR, surrogate markers of renal injury, without any effect on cystatin C levels. Before renoprotective effects of NAC against contrast agent-induced nephropathy are considered, the direct effects of NAC on creatinine levels, urea levels, and eGFR should be assessed.     

The effect of N-acetylcysteine on renal function, nitric oxide, and oxidative stress after angiography

BACKGROUND: Renal failure induced by radiographic contrast agents is a known complication of coronary angiography, especially among patients with chronic renal failure. Recently, treatment with N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to have a protective effect but the mechanisms are unknown. We examined the hypothesis that NAC protected against contrast-induced renal impairment through effects on nitric oxide metabolism and oxidative stress. METHODS: Patients with a serum creatinine concentration above 10(6) micromol/L undergoing coronary angiography were randomly assigned to receive either NAC 1 g (N= 24) or placebo (N= 29) twice daily 24 hours before and after angiography with 0.45% saline hydration in a double-blind study. Creatinine clearance was calculated and urinary nitric oxide and F2-isoprostane excretion were measured at baseline, 24 and 96 hours after angiography. RESULTS: Treatment with NAC significantly improved the effect of contrast media on creatinine clearance, and maximal beneficial effect was observed 24 hours after angiography. Creatinine clearance (mL/min) was 59.5 +/- 4.4, 64.7 +/- 5.8, and 58.7 + 3.9 at baseline, 24, and 96 hours after angiography in the NAC group, respectively, and 65.2 +/- 3.2, 51.5 +/- 3.7, and 53.6 +/- 3.9 in the placebo group, respectively (P < 0.0001). NAC treatment prevented the reduction in urinary nitric oxide after angiography. The urinary nitric oxide/creatinine ratio (micromol/mg) was 0.0058 +/- 0.0004, 0.0057 +/- 0.0004, and 0.0052 +/- 0.0004 at baseline, 24, and 96 hours after angiography in NAC group, respectively, and 0.0057 +/- 0.0007, 0.0031 +/- 0.0005, and 0.0039 +/- 0.0005 in the placebo group, respectively (P= 0.013). NAC had no significant effect on urinary F2-isoprostanes. CONCLUSION: NAC treatment has renoprotective effect in patients with mild chronic renal failure undergoing coronary angiography that may be mediated in part by an increase in nitric oxide production.     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous marker of renal function in patients with mild to moderate impairment of kidney function.

BACKGROUND: Estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is essential for the evaluation of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Recently, serum cystatin C was proposed as a new endogenous marker of GFR and in our study its diagnostic accuracy was compared with that of other markers of GFR. METHODS: In this study, 164 patients with CKD stages 2-3 (GFR 30-89 ml/min/1.73 m2), who had performed 51Cr-labelled ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid clearance, were enrolled. In each patient, serum creatinine and serum cystatin C were determined. Creatinine clearance was calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault (C&G) and the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) formulas. RESULTS: The mean 51CrEDTA clearance was 57 ml/min/1.73 m2, the mean serum creatinine 149 micromol/l and the mean serum cystatin C 1.74 mg/l. We found significant correlation between 51CrEDTA clearance and serum creatinine (R = -0.666), serum cystatin C (R = -0.792), reciprocal of serum creatinine (R = 0.628), reciprocal of serum cystatin C (R = 0.753) and calculated creatinine clearance from the formulas C&G (R = 0.515) and MDRD formulas (R = 0.716). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (cut-off for GFR 60 ml/min/1.73 m2) showed that serum cystatin C had a significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine (P = 0.04) and calculated creatinine clearance from the C&G formula (P < 0.0001), though only in female patients. No difference in diagnostic accuracy was found between serum cystatin C and creatinine clearance calculated from the MDRD formula. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that serum cystatin C is a reliable marker of GFR in patients with mildly to moderately impaired kidney function and has a higher diagnostic accuracy than serum creatinine and calculated creatinine clearance from the C&G formula in female patients.     

Lack of renoprotective effect of i.v. N-acetylcysteine in patients with chronic renal failure undergoing cardiac surgery

Background. Pre-existing chronic renal failure is a significantrisk factor for acute renal failure (ARF) after cardiac surgery.N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been shown to prevent contrast media-inducedARF. Our objective was to evaluate whether i.v. NAC has renoprotectiveeffects in patients with mild renal failure undergoing cardiacsurgery. Methods. In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study,80 patients with mild to moderate renal failure undergoing electiveheart surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass were recruited. Allreceived either i.v. NAC (n=38) or placebo (n=39) at inductionof anaesthesia and then up to 20 h. Urine N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase(NAG) and urine creatinine ratio, plasma creatinine, and serumcystatin C levels indicated renal function. Results. Levels of urinary NAG/creatinine ratio, plasma creatinineand serum cystatin C did not significantly differ between NACand placebo groups during five postoperative days. Urine NAG/creatinineratio increased over 30% in 100% of patients in the NAC groupvs 92.3% in the placebo group (P=0.081). Plasma creatinine increasedby 25% from baseline or over 44 µmol litre^–1 in42.1% in NAC group vs 48.7% in placebo group (P=0.560). Serumcystatin C exceeded 1.4 mg litre^–1 in 78.9% in NAC groupvs 61.5% in placebo group (P=0.096). Conclusions. Prophylactic treatment with i.v. N-acetylcysteinehad no renoprotective effect in patients with pre-existing renalfailure undergoing cardiac surgery.     

右美托咪定对肝移植手术中肾功能的影响

目的评价右美托咪定对肝移植术中患者肾功能的影响。方法选择本院拟行原位肝移植术患者40例,男31例,女9例,年龄40~60岁,ASAⅡ或Ⅲ级。随机分为两组:右美托咪定组(D组)和生理盐水组(C组),每组20例。D组患者诱导前以右美托咪定负荷剂量0.5μg/kg,10min内泵注,随后以0.4μg·kg-1·h-1持续泵注直至手术结束;C组患者按同等方案泵注生理盐水。两组患者在麻醉诱导后(T1)、无肝期30min(T2)、新肝期30min(T3)、新肝期6h(T4)、术后24h(T5)及术后1周(T6)抽取中心静脉血检测胱抑素C、内生肌酐清除率、血尿素氮、血肌酐,收集尿液检测尿微量蛋白、尿红细胞,记录术中升压药和利尿剂的使用量;记录术中出血量、液体输注量、尿量和输血量(包括悬浮红细胞、新鲜冰冻血浆和血小板)。结果与T1时比较,T3、T4时D组胱抑素C、血尿素氮、血肌酐明显升高,内生肌酐清除率明显降低(P0.05),T3~T5时D组尿微量蛋白明显升高(P0.05),T3~T5时C组胱抑素C、血尿素氮、血肌酐、尿微量蛋白明显升高,内生肌酐清除率明显降低(P0.05);D组T3~T5时的胱抑素C、血尿素氮、血肌酐明显低于C组(P0.05);D组T4、T5时的内生肌酐清除率明显高于,尿微量蛋白明显低于C组(P0.05);围术期D组多巴胺、去甲肾上腺素、去氧肾上腺素的使用量和尿量明显多于C组,呋塞米的使用量明显少于C组(P0.05)。两组术中出血量、输液量及输血量(悬浮红细胞、新鲜冰冻血浆、血小板)差异无统计学意义。结论肝移植围术期持续泵注右美托咪定虽然会增加升压药的使用,但能有效减轻术中急性肾损伤,减少利尿剂的使用。     

Evaluation of plasma cystatin C as a marker for glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM: To evaluate plasma cystatin C as a marker of the glomerular filtration rate in patients with type 2 diabetes and their age and sex-matched controls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with one decade of type 2 diabetes and 51 non-diabetic control subjects were studied. Plasma cystatin C was measured by particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay in a new application for the Hitachi 704 analyzer. For comparison, plasma creatinine and creatinine clearance were measured. The plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA by the single injection method was utilized as reference. RESULTS: In patients with type 2 diabetes the correlation coefficient between plasma cystatin C and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA was 0.774 (Spearman's coefficient) and that between plasma creatinine and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA was 0.556 (p = 0.001 for the difference). The correlation between creatinine clearance and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA was 0.411. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis the diagnostic accuracy of plasma cystatin C was significantly better than that of plasma creatinine (p = 0.047) or creatinine clearance (p = 0.001). The best diagnostic efficiency (98%) for cystatin C was obtained when the cut-off limit was set at 1.32 mg/l. In the control group the correlation coefficients were: between cystatin C and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA 0.627, between creatinine and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA 0.466 and between creatinine clearance and the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA 0.416. The area under the ROC plot curve of cystatin C was also greatest in the control group, but the diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C was marginally better than that of either plasma creatinine (p = 0.05) or creatinine clearance (p = 0.08). Among the control subjects various non-renal causes may have interfered with cystatin C concentrations reducing the correlations. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C measurement is a more sensitive and specific test for GFR in patients with type 2 diabetes than plasma creatinine or its clearance, when GFR is normal or only slightly reduced. If an elevated cystatin C concentration is found, non-renal factors have to be excluded. The turbidimetric application described here can easily be applied for most clinical chemistry analyzers and is therefore useful in daily clinical practice.     

Time course of serial cystatin C levels in comparison with serum creatinine after application of radiocontrast media

BACKGROUND: The delayed increase of creatinine after radiocontrast application is a potential reason for overlooking radiocontrast nephrotoxicity. Cystatin C may be more useful to rapidly assess a decrease in glomerular filtration rate (GFR). We compared cystatin C and creatinine to examine their kinetics after application of radiocontrast media. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients (60.8 +/- 8.8 years, 68% males) with normal to subnormal GFR scheduled for coronary angiography (27% with angioplasty), were studied for serum cystatin C and creatinine levels before, 5 h, 24 h and 48 h after angiography. Furthermore, alpha1-microglobulin was checked for evidence of tubular damage. RESULTS: At 5 hours after angiography, there was no significant change compared to baseline in either serum creatinine nor cystatin C. In comparison with the value immediately before coronary angiography, the increase of cystatin C achieved a maximum at 24 h after the application of the contrast agent (+7.2%). Within 48 h, cystatin C decreased to the level before angiography. Serum creatinine increased at 24 h (+7.7%) and continued to increase at 48 h (+11.3%). CONCLUSION: Cystatin C increases earlier after radiocontrast application compared with creatinine. Therefore, cystatin C needs to be investigated as a potential early marker for nephrotoxicity, especially in the upcoming setting of short-time hospitalizations for coronary angiographies and interventions. Thus, further studies in patients with renal failure undergoing radiocontrast application are warranted to assess the usefulness of cystatin C in respect of an earlier detection of radiocontrast nephrotoxicity.     

Cystatin C is a more sensitive marker than creatinine for the estimation of GFR in type 2 diabetic patients

BACKGROUND: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best overall index of renal function in health and disease. Inulin and 51Cr-EDTA plasma clearances are considered the gold standard methods for estimating GFR. Unfortunately, these methods require specialized technical personnel over a period of several hours and high costs. In clinical practice, serum creatinine is the most widely used index for the noninvasive assessment of GFR. Despite its specificity, serum creatinine demonstrates an inadequate sensitivity, particularly in the early stages of renal impairment. Recently, cystatin C, a low molecular mass plasma protein freely filtered through the glomerulus and almost completely reabsorbed and catabolized by tubular cells, has been proposed as a new and very sensitive serum marker of changes in GFR. This study was designed to test whether serum cystatin C can replace serum creatinine for the early assessment of nephropathy in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: The study was performed on 52 Caucasian type 2 diabetic patients. Patients with an abnormal albumin excretion rate (AER) were carefully examined to rule out non-diabetic renal diseases by ultrasonography, urine bacteriology, microscopic urine analysis, and kidney biopsy. Serum creatinine, serum cystatin C, AER, serum lipids, and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were measured. GFR was estimated by the plasma clearance of 51Cr-EDTA. In addition the Cockcroft and Gault formula (Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR) was calculated. RESULTS: Cystatin C serum concentration progressively increased as GFR decreased. The overall relationship between the reciprocal cystatin C and GFR was significantly stronger (r = 0.84) than those between serum creatinine and GFR (r = 0.65) and between Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR and GFR (r = 0.70). As GFR decreased from 120 to 20 mL/min/1.73 m2, cystatin C increased more significantly that serum creatinine, giving a stronger signal in comparison to that of creatinine over the range of the measured GFR. The maximum diagnostic accuracy of serum cystatin C (90%) was significantly better than those of serum creatinine (77%) and Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR (85%) in discriminating between type 2 diabetic patients with normal GFR (>80 mL/min per 1.73 m2) and those with reduced GFR (<80 mL/min/1.73 m2). In particular, the cystatin C cut-off limit of 0.93 mg/L corresponded to a false-positive rate of 7.7% and to a false-negative rate of 1.9%; the serum creatinine cut-off limit of 87.5 micromol/L corresponded to a false-positive rate of 5.8% and to a false-negative rate of 17.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C may be considered as an alternative and more accurate serum marker than serum creatinine or the Cockcroft and Gault estimated GFR in discriminating type 2 diabetic patients with reduced GFR from those with normal GFR.     

A genome-wide linkage scan for genes controlling variation in renal function estimated by serum cystatin C levels in extended families with type 2 diabetes

We performed a variance components linkage analysis of renal function, measured as glomerular filtration rate (GFR), in 63 extended families with multiple members with type 2 diabetes. GFR was estimated from serum concentrations of cystatin C and creatinine in 406 diabetic and 428 nondiabetic relatives. Results for cystatin C were summarized because they are superior to creatinine results. GFR aggregates in families with significant heritability (h(2)) in diabetic (h(2) = 0.45, P < 1 x 10(-5)) and nondiabetic (h(2) = 0.36, P < 1 x 10(-3)) relatives. Genetic correlation (r(G) = 0.35) between the GFR of diabetic and nondiabetic relatives was less than one (P = 0.01), suggesting that genes controlling GFR variation in these groups are different. Linkage results supported this interpretation. In diabetic relatives, linkage was strong on chromosome 2q (logarithm of odds [LOD] = 4.1) and suggestive on 10q (LOD = 3.1) and 18p (LOD = 2.2). In nondiabetic relatives, linkage was suggestive on 3q (LOD = 2.2) and 11p (LOD = 2.1). When diabetic and nondiabetic relatives were combined, strong evidence for linkage was found only on 7p (LOD = 4.0). In conclusion, partially distinct sets of genes control GFR variation in relatives with and without diabetes on chromosome 2q, possibly on 10q and 18p in the former, and on 7p in both. None of these genes overlaps with genes controlling variation in urinary albumin excretion.     

Inaccuracy of GFR predictions by plasma cystatin C in patients without kidney dysfunction and in advanced kidney disease

BACKGROUND: In clinical practice there is need for a simple and reliable test for determination of impaired renal function. With reductions in GFR, the plasma cystatin C concentration (C, mg/l) will increase earlier than serum creatinine, and it is generally agreed that plasma cystatin C is only little affected by body weight, age or sex. However, some reports indicate that cystatin C may be influenced not only by GFR, but also by malignancy, inflammation and high doses of corticosteroids. The aim of the present study was to investigate how plasma cystatin C predicts GFR in distinct subcategories of patients with various disorders as well as in organ transplant patients. METHODS: Plasma cystatin C was measured in 536 patients (age range 0.3-96 years, 262 females, 274 males), consecutively referred to our hospital for determination of GFR by iohexol clearance. Correlations of log GFR vs. log cystatin C were used to compare plasma cystatin C and measured GFR for the following categories: individuals with no known kidney disease (No-KD), malignant patients with (mostly) normal GFR, solid organ-transplanted patients, and patients with native chronic kidney disease (CKD). RESULTS: In patients with normal kidney function and cystatin C level GFR>30 ml/min(-1) (1.73 m2)(-1)) or solid organ transplantation (GFR=84.55 C(1.7666) and GFR=83.95(C-1.5968), respectively). CONCLUSION: Therefore, for these categories, a common equation for all patients with increased cystatin C, irrespective of cause of renal impairment, could be used, namely that presented by Grubb et al. [2005] (GFR=83.93(C-1.676)). However, at marked reductions of renal function (GFR<30 or cystatin C>2), i.e. for CKD Stages 4 and 5, the Grubb prediction equation is less accurate. Based on our data, we suggest the equation GFR=50.52 C(-1.26) for this category of patients.     

N-acetylcysteine reduces urinary albumin excretion following contrast administration: evidence of biological effect.

BACKGROUND: There are conflicting results regarding the effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine (NAC) in attenuating contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). NAC administration independently reduces serum creatinine, potentially confounding studies utilizing creatinine-based endpoints. Albuminuria is a marker of renal injury and spot urine albumin: creatinine ratios (ACR) reflect 24-h urine albumin excretion. We performed a pre-specified secondary analysis from our published negative randomized control trial of NAC for prevention of CIN, to determine if NAC administration reduces albuminuria after contrast exposure following cardiac catheterization. METHODS: We included study patients who had paired urine specimens obtained pre- and post-cardiac catheterization. Baseline characteristics were compared using the chi square test or Mann-Whitney U-test, as appropriate. Changes in ACR were evaluated using binomial exact test. The effect of NAC on post-cardiac catheterization changes in ACR ratio was evaluated by ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients met inclusion criteria (pre- and post-catheterization urinalysis within 7 days). Baseline characteristics neither differ between NAC and placebo groups, nor were they different from those who were excluded. Among the patients receiving NAC, 10.7% improved their ACR ratio and 7.1% worsened; in contrast, in patients on placebo only 4.3% improved, while 21.7% worsened (P=0.015). Change in ACR ratio was not associated with change in kidney function as measured by calculated creatinine clearance or GFR. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this analysis suggest NAC may attenuate contrast-induced glomerular or tubular injury, as defined by albumin excretion, and appears to be independent of any effect on creatinine-derived measures of kidney function. Larger studies are required to confirm this observation.     

Microalbuminuria, but not cystatin C, is associated with carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged adults.

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C, a marker of renal function, has been shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in older adults, but few data are available in middle-aged adults. Moreover, no study has compared cystatin C and microalbuminuria as risk factors for CVD outcomes in middle-aged adults, and it is not known whether cystatin C is related to an early stage of atherosclerosis. METHODS: We evaluated the relationships between serum creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR), serum cystatin C (all divided into tertiles), microalbuminuria and carotid atherosclerosis in a population-based random sample of 523 adults aged 35-64 years from the Seychelles (Indian Ocean). GFR was estimated using the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) equation. Intima-media thickness (IMT) was assessed by B-mode ultrasound. RESULTS: The mean age of the study sample was 52 years, and 55% were women. Carotid IMT was higher in participants with microalbuminuria (802 vs 732 microm, P<0.001) and was inversely associated with GFR tertiles (from 728 to 809 microm, P for trend=0.002). IMT was not associated with cystatin C or creatinine (P for trend=0.10 and 0.16, respectively). In multivariate analyses adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors, the association between microalbuminuria and IMT remained (P=0.047), while the association between GFR and IMT disappeared (P for trend=0.33). CONCLUSIONS: Microalbuminuria, but not cystatin C, is associated with carotid atherosclerosis beyond traditional cardiovascular risk factors among middle-aged adults. Cystatin C does not have a stronger relationship with carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged adults than creatinine.     

Evaluation of cystatin C with iohexol clearance in cardiac surgery

Background: Post‐operative renal dysfunction after cardiac surgery is not uncommon and can lead to adverse outcome. The ability to accurately monitor renal function is therefore important. Cystatin C is known to be a sensitive marker of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but it has not been fully evaluated in cardiac surgery. Iohexol clearance is considered a reliable reference method for the determination of GFR. The aim of this study is to, for the first time, evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of plasma cystatin C compared with iohexol clearance in cardiac surgery. Methods: Twenty‐one patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass grafting were prospectively enrolled in the study. Before surgery and on the second post‐operative day, an iohexol clearance was performed. Plasma cystatin C, plasma creatinine and plasma C‐reactive protein were determined before surgery and on the first, second, third and fifth post‐operative day. Estimated creatinine and cystatin C clearances were determined. Results: Post‐operative cystatin C and 1/cystatin C correlated strongly to iohexol clearance (r=?0.90 and 0.86) and so did creatinine and 1/creatinine (r=?0.83 and 0.78). Estimated creatinine clearance differed from iohexol clearance (P<0.01), whereas estimated cystatin C clearance did not differ from iohexol clearance (P=0.81). No correlation was found between C‐reactive protein and cystatin C. Conclusion: This study indicates that clearance estimations based on cystatin C are more accurate compared with estimations based on creatinine in determining GFR in cardiac surgery. Cystatin C has, in this study population, a stronger correlation to iohexol clearance than creatinine.     

Association of cystatin C and estimated GFR with inflammatory biomarkers: the Heart and Soul Study.

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C is a marker of kidney function that may also be associated with inflammation. In this study, we compared the relative strengths of association of cystatin C and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with inflammatory biomarkers. METHODS: We measured serum cystatin C and creatinine in 990 outpatients with coronary artery disease enrolled in the Heart and Soul Study. GFR was estimated (eGFR) by the abbreviated Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation. We compared the associations of serum cystatin C and eGFR with C-reactive protein (CRP) and fibrinogen, after adjustment for 24 h creatinine clearance. RESULTS: Cystatin C concentrations had moderate correlations with CRP (r=0.15, P<0.001) and fibrinogen (r=0.26, P<0.0001); eGFR had similar correlations with CRP (r=-0.17, P=0.01) and fibrinogen (r=-0.25, P<0.001) among persons with eGFR60 ml/min (r=0.04, P=0.32; r=-0.03, P=0.38). Quartiles of cystatin C were strongly and directly associated with CRP (P=0.02) and fibrinogen (P<0.007) after multivariate adjustment. However, these associations disappeared after adjustment for creatinine clearance (P=0.26 and 0.23, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C concentrations have moderate associations with CRP and fibrinogen that are not independent of creatinine clearance. Although a gold standard of kidney function is lacking, this analysis suggests that cystatin C captures an association of mildly impaired kidney function with increased inflammation.     

Serum cystatin C as an endogenous parameter of the renal function in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C is a proteinase inhibitor with a low molecular weight. The serum levels of cystatin C are mainly dependent on glomerular filtration rate (GFR) making cystatin C an endogenous parameter of GFR. The aim of the study was to elucidate the applicability of serum cystatin C as a parameter of GFR in patients with normal to moderately impaired kidney function and to estimate a reference interval for serum cystatin C. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-six patients (25 males and 21 females) aged 22 to 83 years with various kidney diseases and 250 blood donors (164 males and 86 females) aged 19 to 64 years were included. Cystatin C was measured by an automated particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay, serum creatinine by an enzymatic and by Jaffé method, urine creatinine by an enzymatic method, and GFR by 99mTc-DTPA clearance. RESULTS: Serum levels ofcystatin C and creatinine showed increments with decreasing values of 99mTc-DTPA clearance and a linear relationship was found between 99mTc-DTPA clearance and l/serum cystatin C, l/serum creatinine (enzymatic method), and creatinine clearance. Comparison of the non-parametric receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots for serum cystatin C (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.996; SE = 0.005), serum creatinine (enzymatic method) (AUC = 0.899; SE = 0.044), serum creatinine (Jaffé method) (AUC = 0.870; SE = 0.051), measured creatinine clearance (AUC = 0.959; SE = 0.025), and estimated creatinine clearance (0.950; SE = 0.029) revealed significant differences for serum cystatin C and serum creatinine (enzymatic and Jaffé method) (p values: 0.03 and 0.01). No significant differences were demonstrated between serum cystatin C and measured and estimated creatinine clearance (p value: 0.14 and 0.12). The non-parametric reference interval for serum cystatin C was calculated to be 0.51-1.02 mg/l (median: 0.79 mg/l; range: 0.33 - 1.07 mg/l). CONCLUSION: Serum cystatin C seems to be a better parameter of GFR than serum creatinine in adults with various types of kidney disease with normal to moderately impaired kidney function.     

Cystatin C--a marker for assessment of the glomerular filtration rate in patients with cisplatin chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Cystatin C has recently been proposed as an ideal marker for glomerular filtration rate (GFR). In this study, cystatin C serum levels were evaluated in comparison to serum creatinine concentrations and inulin clearances in patients with normal kidney function receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy to assess the validity of cystatin C as an alternative endogenous marker of GFR. METHODS: Blood samples for the assessment of cystatin C, creatinine and inulin clearances were collected in patients before and after application of cisplatin in a clinical trial. Overall, 41 patients were included in the study, 35 of them were eligible receiving cisplatin in two different cisplatin-based chemotherapy schedules. RESULTS: A 21% increase of cystatin C serum levels was demonstrated in the placebo group after application of cisplatin. Analysis of inulin clearances revealed a 23% loss of inulin clearance in patients of the placebo arm. In contrast, significant changes could not be detected by analysis of serum creatinine levels. CONCLUSIONS: Cystatin C represents a more sensitive clinical marker than serum creatinine for the early assessment of GFR damage caused by cisplatin. Changes in cystatin C serum concentrations correlate well to GFR decrease as measured by inulin clearance.     

The ratio of urinary cystatin C to urinary creatinine for detecting decreased GFR

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and urine and serum concentrations of cystatin C and creatinine were measured in 40 boys and 42 girls. The fractional excretion of cystatin C (FE Cyst C) increased in proportion to the decrease in GFR. Since serum creatinine concentration (S-Creatinine) in the numerator of the fractional excretion equation and serum cystatin C concentration (S-Cystatin C) in the denominator have similar numerical values, they cancel out. The result is an equation in which the FE Cyst C is equal to the ratio of urinary cystatin C to urinary creatinine (u[cystatin-C/Cr]). The ratio of u[cystatin C/Cr] was compared with GFR. Using a receiving operating characteristic (ROC) plot, the data showed that a ratio of u[cystatin C/Cr]*100 that is 0.100 has a sensitivity of 90.0% for identification of children with GFR 60 ml/min per 1.73 m². The false-positive rate is 16.1%. The u[cystatin C/Cr] ratio is a reliable screening tool for detecting decreased GFR that does not require a serum sample.     

Glomerular filtration rate estimated by cystatin C among different clinical presentations

Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates from serum creatinine has not been generalizable across all populations. Cystatin C has been proposed as an alternative marker for estimating GFR. The objective of this study was to compare cystatin C with serum creatinine for estimating GFR among different clinical presentations. Cystatin C and serum creatinine levels were obtained from adult patients (n=460) during an evaluation that included a GFR measurement by iothalamate clearance. Medical records were abstracted for clinical presentation (healthy, native chronic kidney disease or transplant recipient) at the time of GFR measurement. GFR was modeled using the following variables: cystatin C (or serum creatinine), age, gender and clinical presentation. The relationship between cystatin C and GFR differed across clinical presentations. At the same cystatin C level, GFR was 19% higher in transplant recipients than in patients with native kidney disease (P<0.001). The association between cystatin C and GFR was stronger among native kidney disease patients than in healthy persons (P<0.001 for statistical interaction). Thus, a cystatin C equation was derived using only patients with native kidney disease (n=204). The correlation with GFR (r(2)=0.853) was slightly higher than a serum creatinine equation using the same sample (r(2)=0.827), the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation (r(2)=0.825) or the Cockcroft-Gault equation (r(2)=0.796). Averaged estimates between cystatin C and serum creatinine equations further improved correlation (r(2)=0.891). Cystatin C should not be interpreted as purely a marker of GFR. Other factors, possibly inflammation or immunosuppression therapy, affect cystatin C levels. While recognizing this limitation, cystatin C may improve GFR estimates in chronic kidney disease patients.