Total laparoscopic infrarenal aortic aneurysm repair: preliminary results

OBJECTIVES: We describe our initial experience of total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between February 2002 and September 2003, we performed 30 total laparoscopic AAA repairs in 27 men and 3 women. Median age was 71.5 years (range, 46-85 years). Median aneurysm size was 51.5 mm (range, 30-79 mm). American Society of Anesthesiologists class of patients was II, III and IV in 10, 19, and 1 cases, respectively. We performed total laparoscopic endoaneurysmorrhaphy and aneurysm exclusion in 27 and 3 patients, respectively. We used the laparoscopic transperitoneal left retrocolic approach in 27 patients. We operated on 2 patients via a tranperitoneal left retrorenal approach and 1 patient via a retroperitoneoscopic approach. RESULTS: We implanted tube grafts and bifurcated grafts in 11 and 19 patients, respectively. Two minilaparotomies were performed. In 1 case, exposure via a retroperitoneal approach was difficult and, in another case, distal aorta was extremely calcified. Median operative time was 290 minutes (range, 160-420 minutes). Median aortic clamping time was 78 minutes (range, 35-230 minutes). Median blood loss was 1680 cc (range, 300-6900 cc). In our early experience, 2 patients died of myocardial infarction. Ten major nonlethal postoperative complications were observed in 8 patients: 4 transcient renal insufficiencies, 2 cases of lung atelectasis, 1 bowel obstruction, 1 spleen rupture, 1 external iliac artery dissection, and 1 iliac hematoma. Others patients had an excellent recovery with rapid return to general diet and ambulation. Median hospital stay was 9 days (range, 8-37 days). With a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 0.5-20 months), patients had a complete recovery and all grafts were patent. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results show that total laparoscopic AAA repair is feasible and worthwhile for patients once the learning curve is overcome. However, prior training and experience in laparoscopic aortic surgery are needed to perform total laparoscopic AAA repair. Despite these encouraging results, a greater experience and further evaluation are required to ensure the real benefit of this technique compared with open AAA repair.     

Total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysms repair

AIM: The aim of the study was to describe our experience of total laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. METHODS: Between February 2002 and September 2004, we performed 49 total laparoscopic AAA repair in 45 men and 4 women. Median age was 73 years (range, 46-85 years). Median aneurysm size was 52 mm (range, 30-95 mm). ASA class of patients was II, III and IV in 16, 32 and 1 cases, respectively. We used the laparoscopic transperitoneal left retrocolic approach in 47 patients. Seven patients were operated via a tranperitoneal left retrorenal approach and one patient via a retroperitoneoscopic approach. RESULTS: We implanted tube grafts and bifurcated grafts in 19 and 30 patients, respectively. Median operative time was 290 min (range, 160-420 min). Median clamping time was 81.5 min (range, 35-230 min). Median blood loss was 1800 cc (range, 300-6900 cc). Mortality was 6.1% (3 patients). In our early experience, two patients died of myocardial infarction. The 3rd death was due to a multiple organ failure. Thirteen major non lethal postoperative complications were observed in 9 patients (18%). Four patients had local/vascular complications, which required reintervention (8%). Nasogastric tube is now removed at the end of procedure. Median duration of ileus, return to general diet, ambulation and hospital stay were 2, 3, 3 and 10 days. With a median follow-up of 19 months (range, 8-39 months), complete recovery with patent graft was observed in 44 patients. Two patients needed a crossover femoral graft for one iliac dissection and one graft limb occlusion. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that total laparoscopic AAA repair is feasible and worthwhile for patients once the learning curve is overcome. It remains technically demanding and a previous training in videoscopic sutures is essential. Initial learning curve in laparoscopic aortic surgery with aortoiliac occlusive lesions is preferable before to begin laparoscopic AAA repair.     

Total laparoscopic aortic repair for occlusive and aneurysmal disease: first 95 cases.

OBJECTIVES: To analyze the outcome of our preliminary experience with total laparoscopic aortic repair in patients with occlusive or aneurysmal disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From September 2002 to April 2005, we performed 95 consecutive total laparoscopic aortic repair procedures including 72 for aortic occlusive disease (group A) and 23 for abdominal aortic aneurysm (group B). RESULTS: In group A, mean operating time was 216+/-50 min with a mean clamp time of 57+/-21 min and surgical conversion was required in two cases (2.7%). No postoperative death occurred but there were three postoperative complications necessitating re-intervention (retroperitoneal hematoma, embolic ischemia, and early prosthetic infection). Mean duration of hospitalization was 8 days (range, 5-42 days). All grafts were patent at 2 months. In group B, mean operating time was 251+/-57 min with a mean clamp time of 101+/-15 min and surgical conversion was required in seven cases (30%). There was one postoperative death (4.3%) due to pulmonary embolism and one non-fatal complication (retroperitoneal hematoma). Mean duration of hospitalization was 6.4 days (range, 4-12 days). All grafts were patent at 2 months. CONCLUSION: Total laparoscopic repair is feasible and safe for occlusive and aneurysmal aortic disease. Operators must acquire technical skills using simulators.     

Totally laparoscopic juxtarenal aortic anastomosis: an experimental study

The surgical management of juxtarenal aneurysms necessitates suprarenal aortic clamping and control of the renal arteries. We attempted to reproduce this procedure laparoscopically. Five female piglets were submitted to a totally laparoscopic approach of the aortoiliac segment. After laparoscopic control of the renal arteries and suprarenal clamping, a 6-mm Dacron tube graft was anastomosed to the juxtarenal aorta. After the procedure, a midline laparotomy allowed verification of the patency of the renal arteries and the quality of the anastomosis. Mean operative time was 198 minutes (range, 170-240 minutes). The dissection took an average of 92 minutes (range, 75-110 minutes). The mean suprarenal aortic cross-clamp time was 46.3 minutes (range, 29.1-81.5 minutes), and the mean anastomotic time was 28.9 minutes (range, 16.5-68.1 minutes). This study demonstrates in this animal model the feasibility of juxtarenal aortic anastomosis using a laparoscopic technique. Newly designed instruments should allow a shorter clamping time in the future.     

Total laparoscopic versus conventional abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a case-control study

PURPOSE: This study was designed to identify differences in the per- and postoperative outcomes between total laparoscopic and open surgical repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). METHODS: We reviewed 30 patients who underwent total laparoscopic AAA repair between July 2003 and December 2004 (group I). This group was matched in a case-control fashion by AAA morphology and American Society of Anesthesiologists class with a group of 30 patients who underwent conventional AAA repair between April 1997 and May 2004 (group II). Proportions and categoric data were compared with a chi(2) test. Continuous data were compared with a Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: The two groups had comparable characteristics of age and cardiovascular risk factors. The number of tube and bifurcated grafts was 13 for group I and 17 for group II. Median operative time was 255 minutes (range, 170 to 410 minutes) in group I and 200 minutes (range, 130 to 410) in group II (P <.001). Median aortic clamping time was 80 minutes (range, 35 to 110 minutes) in group I and 50 minutes (range, 24 to 150 minutes) in group II (P < .0001). Total blood loss was 1600 mL (range, 400 to 4000 mL) for group I vd 1000 mL (range, 100 to 2900) for group II (P < .01). The mortality rate was 3.3% for group I (1 patient) vs 6.6% (2 patients) for group II (NS). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of postoperative systemic complications (23.3% vs 30%, NS) and local and vascular complications (10% vs 3.3%). Duration of ileus (2 vs 3 days, P < .05), return to normal diet (4 vs 8 days, P < .0001), day of ambulation (3 vs 4 days, P < .05) and dose of narcotics (3.5 mg vs 28.5 mg, P < .05) were significantly lower in group I. Median length of intensive care unit stay was similar between the two groups (48 hours). Median hospital stay was lower in group I but without significant differences with group II (9 vs 11 days, NS). CONCLUSION: This case-control study provides preliminary results that short-term outcomes of total laparoscopic AAA repair are comparable with those of open surgery. Peroperative data demonstrate that laparoscopy is more technically demanding than open repair. However, the technical challenge of laparoscopy does not worsen the postoperative course.     

Robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction: A review of 30 cases

OBJECTIVE: The feasibility of laparoscopic aortic surgery with robotic assistance has been sufficiently demonstrated. Reported is the clinical experience of robot-assisted aortoiliac reconstruction for occlusive disease and aneurysm performed using the da Vinci system. METHODS: Between November 2005 and June 2006, 30 robot-assisted laparoscopic aortoiliac procedures were performed. Twenty-seven patients were prospectively evaluated for occlusive disease, two patients for abdominal aortic aneurysm, and one for common iliac artery aneurysm. Dissections of the aorta and iliac arteries were performed laparoscopically using a transperitoneal direct approach technique, a modification of the Stádler method. The robotic system was used to construct anastomoses, to perform thromboendarterectomies and, in most of the cases, for posterior peritoneal suturing. RESULTS: Robot-assisted procedures were successfully performed in all patients. The robot was used to perform both the abdominal aortic and common iliac artery aneurysm anastomoses, the aortoiliac reconstruction with patch, and to complete the central, end-to-side anastomosis in another operation. Median operating time was 236 minutes (range, 180 to 360 minutes), with a median clamp time of 54 minutes (range, 40 to 120 minutes). Operative time is defined as the time elapsed from the initial incision to final skin closure. Median anastomosis time was 27 minutes (range, 20 to 60 minutes), and median blood loss was 320 mL (range, 100 to 1500 mL). No conversion was necessary, 30-day survival was 100%, median intensive care unit stay was 1.8 days, and median hospital stay was 5.3 days. A regular oral diet was resumed after a mean time of 2.5 days. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery is a feasible technique for aortoiliac surgery. The da Vinci robotic system facilitated the creation of the aortic anastomosis and shortened aortic clamp time in comparison with our laparoscopic techniques.     

Total laparoscopically and robotically assisted aortic aneurysm surgery: a critical evaluation

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopically assisted aortic aneurysm resection requiring a minilaparotomy can be performed as a routine procedure. It was the purpose of our study to evaluate whether a total laparoscopic operation can be offered to aneurysm patients as a minimally invasive alternative. We also wanted to test whether a master-slave robot could facilitate the total laparoscopic procedure. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive number of 50 patients was evaluated. A transperitoneal left retrocolic access was used to expose the aorta. If possible, a tube graft repair was performed. The aortic anastomosis was sutured totally laparoscopically, with the surgeon standing on the right side of the operating table. In 10 consecutive patients, the anastomosis was sutured with the help of the Zeus robot. RESULTS: After excluding 3 cases that required suprarenal cross-clamping, 47 patients were operated using a total laparoscopic approach. A totally laparoscopic operation could be performed successfully in 39 patients with aneurysms. In 8 patients (17%), conversion to a laparoscopic hand-assisted operation with a 7-cm minilaparotomy was required. The robot was used to perform the aortic anastomosis in 10 patients. In 8 patients, a tube graft repair could successfully be performed totally laparoscopically. In the remaining patients, a bifurcated graft was implanted laparoscopically. The mean operating time was 227 minutes in the laparoscopy group and was 242 minutes in those patients in whom the anastomosis was sutured with the help of the Zeus Robot. Mean cross-clamping time, +/- SD, was 81.4 + 31 minutes. None of the patients died perioperatively. Major complications occurred in three patients (6.3%). The overall morbidity was 14.8%, including one patient who required temporary hemodialysis postoperatively. The time to suture the aortic anastomosis was significantly shorter in the robotic-assistance group (40.8 +/- 4 minutes), yet total operating time was longer in this group because of the technical complexity of the robotic device. Patients with a total laparoscopic procedure asked for significantly fewer analgesics and could regain full mobility earlier compared with those patients for whom a minilaparotomy after conversion to the laparoscopic hand-assist procedure was required. CONCLUSIONS: Total laparoscopic aneurysm resection can be offered to the majority of patients in our institution. The robot still requires further refinements to reduce operating times and the aortic cross-clamping period. We now have the technique and the instrumentation to offer laparoscopic aneurysm surgery as a minimally invasive alternative for patients whose conditions are unsuitable for endovascular aneurysm repair.     

Laparoscopy-assisted abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: early and middle-term results of a consecutive series of 122 cases

BACKGROUND: Endoaneurysmorrhaphy with intraluminal graft placement, described by Creech, is the gold standard for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. Endovascular aneurysm repair has gained popularity for its minimal invasiveness and satisfying short-term results, but there are still many concerns about the long-term success of the procedure. Since 1998, laparoscopic surgery has been proposed for AAA treatment. The potential benefits of a minimally invasive procedure reproducing the endoaneurysmorrhaphy results over time have been advocated. In our experience, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) has been routinely used for the open-surgery transperitoneal/retroperitoneal approach and for endovascular aneurysm repair. After 4 years, we are able to define the early and middle-term results of such laparoscopic-assisted treatment. METHODS: From October 2000 to March 2004, 604 consecutive nonurgent AAAs were treated at our institution. Of these, 122 (20.2%) were treated by HALS. Exclusion criteria for HALS were hostile abdomen (previous major abdominal or aortic surgery), bilateral diffuse common iliac and/or hypogastric aneurysms, massive aortoiliac calcifications, and severe cardiac (ejection fraction <35%) and respiratory (P(O2) <60 mm Hg or carbon dioxide >50 mm Hg) insufficiency. Juxtarenal and proximal iliac aneurysms were not a contraindication, nor was obesity. In all patients, we performed a minilaparotomy (7-8 cm) both for laparoscopic hand-assisted dissection and for endoaneurysmorrhaphy. All perioperative data were prospectively recorded. Follow-up consisted of ultrasonography and clinical evaluation after 6 and 12 months and then every year after surgery. RESULTS: The mean laparoscopic and total operative times were respectively 64 +/- 32 minutes and 257 +/- 70 minutes, the mean aortic cross-clamping time was 76 +/- 26 minutes, and the mean autotransfused blood volume was 1136 +/- 711 mL. The overall mortality and morbidity were respectively 0% and 12.2%. Morbidity was surgery related in only two cases (bleeding from an ipogastric artery lesion and a leg graft thrombosis). The mean intensive care unit stay was 14.3 +/- 13 hours. Oral food intake was resumed after 27.4 +/- 15 hours, and patients were discharged after a mean of 4.4 +/- 1.7 days. Operative times were not affected by obesity, suprarenal aortic cross-clamping, or aneurysm size. Both concomitant iliac aneurysms and bifurcated graft implantation (related to longer vascular reconstruction) involved significantly longer operative times. The learning curve of the procedure (comparing the first 30 patients with the last 92 patients) led to significantly shorter endoscopic, cross-clamping, and total operative times (P = .000). The mean follow-up was 28.6 +/- 16 months. Three incisional hernias and one case of bowel occlusion were detected. All these cases (3.4%) required laparoscopic treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The HALS technique is a safe and minimally invasive treatment for AAA; it is useful for limiting the need for conventional open surgery and reducing the length of hospital stay. Despite the lack of randomized studies, HALS seems to be associated with a better postoperative course than standard open surgery. HALS can also be considered as an equivalent of a well-established procedure and as a bridge between open and total laparoscopic surgery.     

Aortic clamping during elective operations for infrarenal disease: The influence of clamping time on renal function

OBJECTIVE: Aortic clamping proximal to the renal arteries is sometimes necessitated during infrarenal and juxtarenal aortic surgery and may be associated with an increased risk of renal ischemia and its consequences. The aim of the study was to estimate this risk and possibly identify a "safe" duration of renal ischemia. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for 60 consecutive patients (from 1987 to 1994) with abdominal aortic aneurysm (n = 43) and occlusive disease (n = 17) confined to the infrarenal or juxtarenal aorta who underwent infrarenal aortic reconstruction with temporary suprarenal clamping. The data obtained included risk factors, preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine level, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) value, proteinuria before surgery, and suprarenal clamping times. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 64.4 years (+/- 11.4 years), and 74% were men. Concomitant cardiac disease was present in 41% of the patients, and 9% had diabetes. The preoperative creatinine level was 1.21 mg/dL (+/- 0.54 mg/dL), and the BUN value was 16.6 mg/dL (+/- 7.8 mg/dL). During surgery, blood flow to the renal arteries was interrupted for 32.0 minutes (+/- 17 minutes). None of the surviving patients needed dialysis or had signs of acute renal failure after the operations, but transient azotemia (rise in creatinine level) occurred in 23% of the patients. Risk factors for this condition were high preoperative creatinine values and hypotension during surgery, but the main determinant was total renal ischemia time. Odds ratios for such transient renal dysfunction showed as much as a 10-fold risk when suprarenal aortic clamping was greater than 50 minutes as compared with 30 minutes or less. CONCLUSION: Postoperative renal function impairment is rare in this group of patients. If suprarenal clamp duration (renal ischemia time) is brief, patients with normal preoperative creatinine levels exhibit no increase or a marginal increase in BUN or creatinine levels after surgery. Accordingly, suprarenal aortic clamping less than 50 minutes in this patient group appears safe and well tolerated.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Hand-assisted laparoscopic aneurysm resection enables the surgeon to use his tactile senses while performing a laparoscopic aneurysm repair. Even more complex procedures that involve suprarenal clamping of the aorta can be performed by using this laparoscopically assisted approach. Twenty-nine laparoscopic patients were compared with a control group of 19 patients who were operated on conventionally. Transperitoneal hand-assisted laparoscopic aneurysm resection with a tube graft or a bifurcated graft was performed. The anastomosis was sutured with conventional instruments using the mini-incision as an access. The time for laparoscopy did not exceed 40 minutes. The incidence of complications did not vary between groups. The mean operating time was 135 minutes in the conventional group versus 180 minutes in the minimal invasive group. Intensive care stay and postoperative hospital stay were significantly shorter after the laparoscopic procedure. An oral diet was resumed significantly earlier, and the time until complete recovery was shortened in the miniaccess group. Hand-assisted laparoscopic aneurysm resection can be performed safely with operating times almost as expeditiously as in open surgery. Because it can be offered to the majority of patients with aortic disease, the technique described has distinct advantages over a total laparoscopic approach and a less steep learning curve.     

Impact of endovascular repair on open aortic aneurysm surgical training.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of an endovascular stent-graft program on vascular training in open aortic aneurysm surgery. METHODS: The institutional and vascular surgery fellow experience in aortic aneurysm repair during a 6-year period was reviewed. The 3-year period before introduction of endovascular repair was compared with the 3-year period after introduction of endovascular repair. All patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) or thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs were entered prospectively into a vascular registry and retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the changing patterns in aortic aneurysm treatment and surgical training. RESULTS: Between July 1994 and June 2000, a total of 588 patients with AAA or thoracoabdominal aneurysms were treated at Stanford University Medical Center. There were 296 (50%) open infrarenal AAA repairs, 87 (15%) suprarenal AAA repairs, 47 (8%) thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs, and 153 (26%) endovascular stent-grafts. The total number of aneurysms repaired per year by vascular fellows before the endovascular program was 71.3 +/- 4.9 (range, 68-77) and increased to 124.7 +/- 35.6 (range, 91-162) after introduction of endovascular repair (P <.05). This increase was primarily caused by the addition of endovascular stent-graft repairs by vascular fellows (51.0 +/- 29.0/year [range, 23-81]). There was no change in the number of open infrarenal aortic aneurysm repairs per year, 53.0 +/- 6.6 (range, 48-56) before endovascular repair versus 47.0 +/- 1.7 (range, 46-49) after (P = not significant). There was a significant increase in the number of suprarenal AAA repairs per year by vascular fellows, 10.0 +/- 1.0 (range, 9-11) before endovascular repair compared with 19.0 +/- 6.5 (range, 13-26) after (P <.05). There was no change in the number of thoracoabdominal aneurysm repairs per year between the two groups, 8.0 +/- 3.0 (range, 4-11) before endovascular repair compared with 7.6 +/- 2.3 (range, 5-9) after. CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of an endovascular aneurysm stent-graft program significantly increased the total number of aneurysms treated. Although the number of open aneurysm repairs has remained the same, the complexity of the open aneurysm experience has increased significantly for vascular fellows in training.     

Hand-assisted laparoscopic aorto-aortic bypass: initial experience in a porcine model

Videoscopic surgical techniques have been developed to reduce morbidity of open aortic reconstructions. The advantage of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) technique is the introduction of the surgeon's hand into the peritoneal cavity. The aims of this study were to assess the feasibility and to examine the learning curve, limitations, and pitfalls of the HALS technique to perform aortic reconstruction in a porcine model for training purposes. HALS aorto-aortic 8 mm polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) interposition grafts were placed in 12 pigs. Proficiency was judged by measuring operative time points, satisfactory completion of the operation, and the need to convert to open procedure. The strength of the relationship between order number in which a procedure was performed and the various surgical time point measures was described with the Spearman rank correlation. HALS aortic grafting was successful in the last 8 pigs. The first 2 pigs required conversion to open repair, and the graft of the third and fourth animals occluded early. Median operative time was 115 minutes (range: 75 to 205), median intestinal retraction time was 28 minutes (range: 10 to 40), median aortoiliac dissection time was 30 minutes (range: 20 to 60), and median aortic cross-clamp time was 48 minutes (range: 35 to 82). The Spearman rank correlations and p values between the order of the procedure and the intestinal retraction time, aortoiliac dissection time, clamping time, and total operative time were -0.62 (0.06), -0.47 (0.17), -0.69 (0.03), and -0.83 (0.03), respectively. HALS facilitates intestinal retraction and completion of laparoscopic aortoiliac dissection. It offers adequate exposure in pigs for aortic grafting and allows open sutured aortic anastomosis. The learning curve for HALS aortic surgery in a porcine model is short and within reach of surgeons with standard laparoscopic surgery skills, since no laparoscopic suturing is required. Training on this porcine model may be an efficient and safe way to introduce surgeons to HALS for aortoiliac reconstruction.     

Fenestrated and branched stent-grafting after previous surgery provides a good alternative to open redo surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To present our experience using fenestrated and branched endoluminal grafts for Para-anastomotic aneurysms (PAA) following prior open aneurysm surgery, and after previous endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) complicated by proximal type I endoleak. METHODS: Fenestrated and/or branched EVAR was performed on eleven patients. Indications included proximal type I endoleak after EVAR and short infrarenal neck (n=4), suprarenal aneurysm after open AAA (n=4), distal type I endoleak after endovascular TAA (n=1), proximal anastomotic aneurysm after open AAA (n=1), and an aborted open AAA repair due to bleeding around a short infrarenal neck. RESULTS: The operative target vessel success rate was 100% (28/28) with aneurysm exclusion in all patients. Mean hospital stay was 6.0 days (range 2-12 days, SD 3.5 days). Thirty day mortality was 0%. All cause mortality during 18 months mean follow-up (range 5-44 months, SD 16.7 months) was 18% (2/11) with no deaths from aneurysm rupture. Cumulative visceral branch patency was 96% (27/28) at 42 months. Average renal function remained unchanged during the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Our report highlights the potential of fenestrated and branched technology to improve re-operative aortic surgical outcomes. The unique difficulties of increased graft on graft friction hindering placement, short working distance, and increased patient co-morbidities should be recognized.     

Collective experience with hybrid procedures for suprarenal and thoracoabdominal aneurysms

Not every patient is fit for open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) repair, nor is every TAAA or juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm suitable for branched or fenestrated endovascular exclusion. The hybrid procedure consists of debranching of the renal and visceral arteries followed by endovascular exclusion of the aneurysm and might be an alternative in these patients. Between May 2004 and March 2006, 16 patients were treated with a hybrid procedure. The indications were recurrent suprarenal or thoracoabdominal aneurysms after previous abdominal and/or thoracic aortic surgery (n = 8), type I to III TAAAs (n = 3), proximal type I endoleak after endovascular repair (n = 2), penetrating ulcer of the juxtarenal aorta (n = 1), visceral patch aneurysm after type IV open repair (n = 1), and primary suprarenal aneurysm (n = 1). Eight (50%) of 16 patients were judged to be unfit for open TAAA repair. The hospital mortality rate was 31% (5 of 16). Four of five deceased patients were unfit for thoracophrenic laparotomy. Two patients died from cardiac complications and three from visceral ischemia. No spinal cord ischemia was detected, and temporary renal failure occurred in four patients (25%). The mean follow-up was 13 months (range 6-28 months). During follow-up, no additional grafts occluded and no patients died. Hybrid procedures are technically feasible but have substantial mortality (31%), especially in patients unfit for open repair (80%). They might be indicated when urgent TAAA surgery is required or when vascular anatomy is unfavorable for fenestrated endografts in patients with extensive previous open aortic surgery.     

Totally laparoscopic explantation of migrated stent graft after endovascular aneurysm repair: a report of two cases

This report describes the removal of two migrated stent grafts and the repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms by laparoscopic technique. In these two cases, endovascular treatment was not indicated because of device migration into the aneurysm and the presence of thrombus within the endografts. Operative times were 245 and 230 minutes, with aortic clamp times of 95 and 66 minutes. The patients were extubated immediately after the procedure, resumed a normal diet on postoperative day 2, and were discharged home on postoperative days 5 and 6. We believe these are the first reported cases of laparoscopic explantation of migrated aortic stent grafts in the literature.     

Laparoscopic inferior mesenteric artery ligation: an alternative for the treatment of type II endoleaks

One of the complications of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is endoleak from a patent inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). Between 1995 and 2002, of 213 patients who had endografts placed for abdominal aortic aneurysm, 4 (1.8%) had enlarging aneurysms from type II endoleaks involving a patent IMA and underwent a secondary procedure. Two patients had endovascular embolizations through the superior mesenteric artery, and two patients underwent laparoscopic inferior mesenteric artery ligation. In the laparoscopic group, operative time was 85 minutes (range, 35-136 minutes). One laparoscopic procedure had to be redone due to a missed IMA branch. Length of stay was 0 and 3 days. At mean followup at 16 months (range, 2-42 months), all patients had had successful resolution of endoleaks. Laparoscopic ligation is a minimally invasive treatment for IMA-mediated type II endoleaks.     

Long-term results after open repair of inflammatory infrarenal aortic aneurysms

Objective

The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term outcome after open repair of inflammatory infrarenal aortic aneurysms.

Open repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JAA) remains a safe option in the era of fenestrated endografts

OBJECTIVES: Widespread application of infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has resulted in a proportionate increase in open juxtarenal aortic aneurysm (JAA) repairs. Fenestrated endograft technology for JAA is developing rapidly, but only limited outcomes are known. The aim of this study was to review our open JAA experience in an era of fenestrated endograft technology, identify factors associated with increased surgical risk, determine early and midterm outcome, and provide a basis for comparison for future endovascular procedures. METHODS: Data from 126 consecutive patients who underwent elective JAA repair requiring suprarenal aortic clamping from 2001 to 2006 were analyzed retrospectively. Electronic medical chart reviews were used to record 30-day complication rates. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with surgical morbidity. Mail-out questionnaires and telephone surveys were conducted to determine long-term follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety-eight males and 28 females (median age 74 years; range 55 to 93) were included in the study. Preoperative risk factors included: coronary artery disease (CAD) 58%, pulmonary disease 41%, renal insufficiency (serum creatinine [Cr] > 1.5mg/dL) 17%, and diabetes 9%. Fifteen patients underwent concomitant renal artery revascularization. Mean operative time was 319 minutes (range 91 to 648). Thirty-day mortality was 1/126 (0.8%). Median hospital length of stay was 7 days (range 3 to 85); median intensive care unit length of stay was 2 days (1 to 64). Complications included renal insufficiency (Cr increase > 0.5 mg/dL) in 22 (18%), cardiac in 17 (13%), and pulmonary in 14 (11%). Five patients required temporary hemodialysis; only one after hospital dismissal. Mean follow-up was 48 months (range 9-80). On multivariate analysis, age > or = 78 years (P = .001), male gender (P = .04), hypertension (P =.01), previous myocardial infarction (P = .047), and diabetes (P =.009) were predictive of cardiac complications. Renal artery revascularization (P = .01) and prior MI (P = .04) were multivariate predictors of pulmonary complications. Both prolonged operative (> or =351 minutes, P = .02) and renal ischemia (> or =23 minutes, P =.004) times predicted postoperative renal insufficiency. One, 3, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 93.9%, 78.3%, and 63.8%, respectively and were not significantly different than an age- and gender-matched sample of the US population (P = .16). Mortality was not predicted by any specific risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Open surgical repair of JAA is associated with low mortality and remains the gold standard. Although 18% had renal complications, only one patient had permanent renal failure. Patients with a combination of physiologic and anatomic risk factors identified on multivariate analysis may benefit from fenestrated endograft repair.     

Laparoscopic assisted aortic surgery. A review

We give an overview of different laparoscopic assisted techniques to perform aortic surgery. In a meta-analysis the paper describes the combined experience of two vascular surgical centers who together have performed more than 524 laparoscopic assisted aortic procedures. Basically the following techniques can be used to perform a laparoscopic assisted procedure: 1) transperitoneal approach (the Alimi procedure); 2) hand assisted laparoscopy (the Ferrari technique); 3) left retrocolic laparoscopic assisted; 4) combining laparoscopic assisted and total laparoscopy techniques. In all cases a transperitoneal approach was chosen to dissect the aorta. This was either accomplished directly or using a left retrocolic access originally described by Dion as the apron technique. In some cases a hand assist device was used, which permits the surgeon to introduce the non dominant hand while maintaining the pneumoperitoneum. The mortality in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) patients in either center did not exceed 1.8%. ICU stay, postoperative ileus and length of stay were significantly shorter compared to patients with a full length incision. The Pisa group showed that there is still a significant reduction of operating time as well as aortic cross clamping time beyond the learning curve of the first 30 patients. The analysis of the pooled data shows that even in AAA patients the laparoscopic assisted procedure can be performed with operating times of less than 3 h and hospital stays up to 4 days, which we only know from endovascular aneurysm exclusion. This is the first publication of hand assisted laparoscopic endoaneurysm repair involving a large number of patients. The operations can be performed with expediency and safety. We can use these laparoscopic procedures to perform even complex aortic operations including suprarenal aneurysms with revascularization of the renal and visceral arteries. An outlook of future developments including stapling technology is given.     

Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery of the infrarenal aorta

Background Recently introduced robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) facilitates endoscopic surgical manipulation and thereby reduces the learning curve for (advanced) laparoscopic surgery. We present our learning curve with RALS for aortobifemoral bypass grafting as a treatment for aortoiliac occlusive disease. Methods Between February 2002 and May 2005, 17 patients were treated in our institution with robot-assisted laparoscopic aorto-bifemoral bypasses. Dissection was performed laparoscopically and the robot was used to make the aortic anastomosis. Operative time, clamping time, and anastomosis time, as well as blood loss and hospital stay, were used as parameters to evaluate the results and to compare the first eight (group 1) and the last nine patients (group2). Results Total median operative, clamping, and anastomosis times were 365 min (range: 225–589 min), 86 min (range: 25–205 min), and 41 min (range: 22–110 min), respectively. Total median blood loss was 1,000 ml (range: 100–5,800 ml). Median hospital stay was 4 days (range: 3–57 days). In this series 16/18 anastomoses were completed with the use of the robotic system. Three patients were converted (two in group 1, one in group 2), and one patient died postoperatively (group 1). Median clamping and anastomosis times were significantly different between groups 1 and 2 (111 min [range: 85–205 min] versus 57.5 min [range: 25–130 min], p < 0.01 and 74 min [range: 40–110 min] versus 36 min [range: 22–69 min], p < 0.01, respectively) Total operative time, blood loss, and hospital stay showed no significant difference between groups 1 and 2. Conclusions Robot-assisted aortic anastomosis was shown to have a steep learning curve with considerable reduction of clamping and anastomosis times. However, due to a longer learning curve for laparoscopic dissection of the abdominal aorta, operation times were not significantly shortened. Even with robotic assistance, laparoscopic aortoiliac surgery remains a complex procedure. Presented at SAGES 2006, April 26–29 2006, Dallas, Texas, USA An erratum to this article can be found at