Mortality in retroperitoneal hematoma

Eighty-one patients sustained retroperitoneal hematoma (RH) from blunt (70%) and penetrating (30%) trauma. Retroperitoneal hematomas were classified into 10 centro-medial Zone I, 25 lateral Zone II, and 46 pelvic Zone III hematomas. The mean injury Severity Score (ISS) for the entire series was 26.4 +/- 14. The mean ISS of nonsurvivors was 37.6 +/- 12. Overall mortality was 20%; if head injury deaths are excluded (six), mortality was 13%. Retroperitoneal hematoma associated with pelvic fracture had a mortality of 19%. Incidence of respiratory failure for entire series, excluding head trauma, was 29%. Respiratory failure occurred in 37% of patients with Zone III injuries. A requirement for ventilatory support greater than 48 hours was associated with a mortality of 35%. PaO2/FIO2 at 48 hours in intubated patients was significantly decreased in nonsurvivors compared to survivors, whereas the mean ISS of this subset of patients did not differentiate between survivors and nonsurvivors.     

Intraoperative decision-making in renal trauma surgery

Surgery for renal trauma requires three intraoperative decisions: Should the kidney be explored? Is pedicle control necessary? What procedure should be performed? In 85 explorations for penetrating (66) and blunt (19) trauma, we found that penetrating injuries, active hemorrhage, or major tissue destruction are reasons for mandatory renal exploration. This resulted in 26 nephrectomies, 9 partial nephrectomies, and 4 major renorrhaphies. Forty-six patients underwent minor renorrhaphy or needless exploration without complications. Formal pedicle control was carried out 33 times (39%), but it was never necessary to control parenchymal hemorrhage. Unless a wound overlies the great vessels, perirenal hematomas can be safely entered laterally without prior pedicle control using manual pedicle or parenchymal control if needed.     

Approach to major abdominal vascular injury

Abdominal vascular injuries account for 25% to 30% of all vascular injuries seen in urban trauma centers where penetrating wounds are the most common cause of trauma. Patients have moderate hypotension if contained hematomas are present and present in extremis with massive abdominal distension, if hemorrhage into the peritoneal cavity is occurring. Injuries occur in five areas, each containing its own vessels and techniques of exposure and vascular repair. Included are the midline supramesocolic, midline inframesocolic, lateral perirenal, lateral pelvic, and portal areas. In these areas, arterial repair is essentially always attempted, whereas ligation of major veins, if necessary, is well tolerated in many instances. Survival depends on the number and magnitude of associated vascular and visceral injuries. If an operation can be performed soon after injury, survival with most major abdominal arterial injuries ranges from 35% to 85%. When major abdominal venous injuries are considered, the survival rate ranges from 50% to 95%. Postoperative complications include thrombosis of repairs, dehiscence of suture lines, and infection. Second-look operations may be beneficial to evaluate tenuous repairs, whereas various techniques are helpful in avoiding suture line breakdowns as a result of infection.     

Retroperitoneal haematoma and related organ injury--management approach

Retroperitoneal haematoma following blunt or penetrating trauma may arise from injuries to bone, major vascular structures, hollow viscera or solid organs. Clinical significance varies from inconsequential to fatal. Although the guidelines for exploration are clear-cut during laparotomy for associated intra-abdominal injuries, this is not the case with isolated retroperitoneal haematoma. Lateral and pelvic haematomas may be selectively explored and central haematomas always need exploration. All penetrating wound tracts should be explored, irrespective of the site of the haematoma, to exclude vital structural injury.     

Intra-abdominal and retroperitoneal organ injuries diagnosed on dynamic computed tomograms obtained for assessment of renal trauma

The efficacy of dynamic computed tomography in assessment of renal, intra-abdominal, and retroperitoneal organ injuries is analyzed in some 444 patients. This technique contributed most valuable information toward the diagnosis of such coexistent injuries in patients who sustained blunt trauma. CT identified associated abdominal or retroperitoneal organ injuries in 85% of the patients (277 of 324), clinical examination in only 26%. CT proved invaluable for assessment of injury to bowel and mesentery, pancreas, and retroperitoneal vascular structures, giving rise to hematomas. CT diagnosed all such injuries, clinical examination from 0% (pancreas) to 11% (retroperitoneal hematomas). In patients with penetrating injury, dynamic CTs added valuable information on the status of viability of the injured organs. A relatively high number of false positive diagnoses resulted in only four unnecessary explorations. In all other patients, the erroneous diagnosis was revealed on repeat CTs undertaken because of inconsistency of the clinical course and clinical findings with the initially suggested CT diagnosis or at time of exploration undertaken for correction of other confirmed injuries. Discovery of associated intra- or retroperitoneal organ injuries, particularly in patients who sustained blunt trauma, has resulted in modification of treatment which prevented late sequelae and complications and thereby substantially reduced hospitalization time.     

Traumatic lesions of the duodenum

Injuries of the duodenum are relatively uncommon on account of the organ's size and position. Since most of it is retroperitoneal, lesions involving it give rise to such subtle physical and radiological signs that the diagnosis is often overlooked in the early phase after injury. Twenty-six cases of duodenal injury are reviewed, 18 of which were due to penetrating wounds and the remaining 8 to blunt trauma. Anterior penetrating wounds were usually associated with other intraperitoneal lesions which caused more obvious physical signs and thus drew attention to the necessity for exploration. On the other hand, both blunt trauma and posterior stab wounds frequently caused isolated retroperitoneal duodenal lesions where the diagnosis was not evident on admission, but in which the insidious and progressive development of symptoms and signs drew attention to the need for laparotomy. Early repair combined with drainage of the retroperitoneal space resulted in a good result in 23 of 26 cases, 4 of whom, however, developed a temporary lateral duodenal fistula. Two of the 3 deaths were in patients who presented late and had associated pancreatic injuries while the third was due to an abdominal vascular injury.     

Radiographic assessment of renal trauma: a 10-year prospective study of patient selection

To develop criteria to determine which patients require radiographic assessment after blunt renal trauma, we studied prospectively 1,146 consecutive patients with either blunt (1,007) or penetrating (139) renal trauma between 1977 and 1987. Based on our preliminary results from 1977 to 1983, in which none of the 221 patients with blunt trauma and microscopic hematuria without shock had significant renal injuries, we designed a prospective study to determine if such patients could be managed safely without radiographic staging. During the last 10 years significant renal injuries were found in 44 patients (4.4 per cent) with blunt trauma and gross hematuria or microscopic hematuria associated with shock, and in 88 patients (63 per cent) with penetrating trauma. No significant injuries occurred in the 812 patients with blunt trauma and microscopic hematuria without shock, 404 of whom had complete radiographic assessment and 408 of whom did not. There were no delayed operations or significant sequelae related to the renal injury in these patients. We conclude that complete radiographic staging is mandatory in patients with penetrating trauma to the flank or abdomen and in patients with blunt trauma associated with either gross hematuria or microscopic hematuria and shock. However, patients with blunt trauma, microscopic hematuria and no shock who do not have associated major intra-abdominal injuries can be managed safely without excretory urography.     

Management of traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma

Traumatic retroperitoneal hematoma (RPH) may arise from injury to bony structures, major blood vessels, and intestinal or retroperitoneal viscera. To categorize the management of RPH, the retroperitoneum may be divided into three zones. Zone 1 (central) extends from the esophageal hiatus to the sacral promontory. Zone 2 (lateral) extends from the lateral diaphragm to the iliac crest. Zone 3 (pelvic) is confined to the retroperitoneal space of the pelvic bowl. For the traumatized patient with RPH, laparotomy is mandated by persistent hemodynamic instability despite intensive volume replacement. The judgment of whether and when to explore the retroperitoneal hematoma is guided by the mechanism of injury (blunt or penetrating) and the location of the RPH. RPH localized to the upper central area (Zone 1) after penetrating trauma implies injury to the great vessels and always requires urgent surgical exploration. RPH in other zones should be evaluated by CT and/or angiography; ongoing hemorrhage may respond to therapeutic embolization.     

Diagnostic modalities in abdominal trauma. Peritoneal lavage, ultrasonography, computed tomography scanning, and arteriography

Numerous algorithms encompassing the diagnostic studies described above have been published in recent years. For practical purposes, diagnostic peritoneal lavage and CT scanning are the diagnostic studies most commonly used in patients without obvious indications for celiotomy after blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma. Diagnostic peritoneal lavage is invasive, rapidly performed, cheap, and accurate and has a primary role in documenting intra-abdominal bleeding or contamination in hypotensive patients with blunt trauma or selected stable patients with penetrating stab wounds. It misses small and large injuries to the diaphragm and cannot rule out injury to retroperitoneal structures. Computed tomography is noninvasive, time consuming to perform, expensive, and accurate and has a primary role in defining the location and magnitude of intra-abdominal injuries in stable patients with blunt trauma or with penetrating trauma to the flank or back. In many hospitals, it misses gastrointestinal perforations or ruptures. Both studies may be needed in the same stable patient, and both should be available and used in a complementary fashion in the modern trauma center.     

Management of pancreatic trauma.

Since 1950, 300 patients sustaining pancreatic injuries have been managed. Three-fourths of the injuries were due to penetrating trauma with a 20% mortality and one-fourth due to blunt trauma resulting in an 18% mortality. The pancreatic injury was responsible for death in only 3% of patients. Early onset of shock resulted in 38% mortality whereas only 4% of normotensive patients died. No patient died of an isolated pancreatic injury. Sepsis was the second most common cause of death following hemorrhage. Preoperative serum amylase was elevated more frequently following blunt trauma than penetrating trauma, but did not correlate with injury. There has been a tendency toward more frequent use of distal pancreatectomy for simple penetrating injuries without obvious ductal violation which increases operative time, blood loss and possible intra-abdominal abscess since resection usually requires splenectomy. Patients considered for an 80% distal resection are better managed with a Roux-en-Y limb to the distal pancreas since three patients developed diabetes following an 80% or greater resection. A conservative approach consisting of Penrose and sump drainage is adequate for most injuries.     

Angiographic Embolization for Intraperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Injuries

Angiographic embolization (AE) has been used extensively for bleeding control after injuries to the face and neck. Its role in abdominal trauma requires further exploration. We reviewed the medical records of 137 consecutive patients who underwent angiography with the intent to embolize bleeding sites within the abdomen. Of them, 97 (71%) had blunt and 40 (29%) had penetrating trauma. AE was performed for hemorrhage associated with pelvic fractures (97 patients), liver lacerations (n= 26), renal lacerations (n= 12), splenic lacerations (n= 5), other injuries (n= 9), and multiple injuries (n= 12). On angiography, 102 patients were found to have bleeding sites and underwent AE, with angiographic and clinical bleeding control in 93 (91%). The rate of successful hemostasis by AE was identical in blunt and penetrating trauma patients. There was no major morbidity after AE. No factors predicted patients with a high likelihood to have a positive angiogram. Patients who had AE before or after a period of attempted hemodynamic stabilization in the intensive care unit were no different with respect to hemodynamic parameters immediately before AE or effectiveness of AE for bleeding control. AE is a safe and effective method for controlling bleeding after blunt and penetrating intra- and retroperitoneal injuries. Early AE may be used in selected patients as a front-line therapeutic intervention that offers expeditious hemostasis and prevents delays in definitive bleeding control.     

Management of isolated duodenal rupture due to blunt abdominal trauma: case series and literature review

Introduction  

Duodenal injuries are uncommon and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality due to delayed diagnosis (in the case of blunt trauma) or associated major vascular injuries (in the case of penetrating trauma). Isolated blunt injuries may have a subtle clinical presentation, and are particularly difficult to diagnose when the perforation is located in the retroperitoneal part of the duodenum.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of rectal trauma. Blunt versus penetrating

In the last 6 years, nine patients with blunt and 16 with penetrating rectal injuries were treated at University Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida. Blunt trauma was caused by vehicular accidents in seven patients and crush injuries in two. Penetrating rectal trauma was due to gunshot wounds in ten patients and foreign body insertion in six. All patients with blunt injury had bright red rectal bleeding, which led to diagnostic sigmoidoscopy. Rectal injury was identified at sigmoidoscopy in 12 patients who had penetrating wounds and at laparotomy in four patients. Thirteen patients who had penetrating rectal trauma had injury to only the rectum or to one additional organ. In contrast, all patients who had blunt rectal trauma had at least three associated injuries. In the penetrating group, 13 patients were treated by colostomy and mucus fistula; three patients with mucosal injury were managed nonoperatively. The only death occurred in a patient whose rectal injury was initially missed. Patients who had blunt rectal trauma were managed with colostomy and mucus fistula. Three patients died postoperatively, two of pelvic bleeding and one of head injury. Hemodynamic stabilization, colostomy and mucus fistula, presacral drainage, and rectal washout constitute proper treatment of patients with blunt or penetrating rectal trauma. Because of the greater number and severity of associated injuries, morbidity and mortality are higher after blunt rectal trauma.     

Ureteral trauma: Patterns and mechanisms of injury of an uncommon condition

Background

Traumatic ureteral injuries are uncommon, thus large series are lacking.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (2002-2006).

Results

Of the 22,706 genitourinary injuries, 582 ureteral injury patients were identified (38.5% blunt, 61.5% penetrating). Patients were 84% male, 38% white, and 37% black (mean age, 31 y). Blunt trauma patients had a median Injury Severity Score of 21.5 versus 16.0 for penetrating injury (P < .001). Mortality rates were 9% blunt, and 6% penetrating (P = .166). Penetrating trauma patients had a higher incidence of bowel injuries (small bowel, 46%; large bowel, 44%) and vascular injuries (38%), whereas blunt trauma patients had a higher incidence of bony pelvic injuries (20%) (P < .001).

Conclusions

Ureteral injuries are uncommon, seen in approximately 3 per 10,000 trauma admissions, and occur more in penetrating than in blunt trauma. The most common associated injury for blunt ureteral trauma is pelvic bone fracture, whereas penetrating ureteral trauma patients have more hollow viscus and vascular injuries.     

Thoracotomy for blunt trauma: traditional indications may not apply

The indications for performing as urgent thoractomy after trauma are based on the criteria used for penetrating injuries. However, few data are available on the use of these indications for patients with blunt injuries. In a retrospective study (June 1996 to July 2001), we compared the indications of urgent thoracotomy after blunt injury and penetrating injury in patients who underwent thoracotomy within 24 hours of hospital admission at our institution. Patients with blunt aortic injuries or emergency department thoracotomies were excluded from evaluation. Fifty-nine patients were identified (37 penetrating injuries, 22 blunt injuries). Blunt trauma victims had a higher mortality rate than penetrating trauma victims (73% vs. 22%). Chest tube output was the indication for nontherapuetic thoracotomy in 5 patients with blunt injuries whereas this occurred in only 1 penetrating injury victim (P = 0.04). All 5 blunt injury patients underwent a prior procedure and were coagulopathic when thoracotomy was performed. In conclusion, thoracotomy following blunt trauma is associated with a high rate of mortality. The rate of nontherapeutic exploration is increased when chest tube output is the indication for thoracotomy after blunt trauma. Since the majority of such patients have multicavitary injuries that require prior operation and are commonly coagulopathic, caution should be exercised when deciding whether to proceed with thoracotomy based solely on chest tube output.     

Efficacy of emergency room thoracotomy in pediatric trauma

With improved rapid transportation systems, an increasing number of children may arrive at the emergency room (ER) without detectable vital signs and may undergo vigorous resuscitation, including emergency room thoracotomy, aortic cross clamping, and open cardiac massage. Of 1,287 pediatric trauma admissions between 1980 and 1985, 101 deaths were recorded. Fifty (50%) of the deaths occurred in the ER. Thirty-three of the patients were pronounced dead with obvious irreversible injuries, while 17 (34%) with suspected thoracoabdominal injuries underwent ER thoracotomy during resuscitation. None of the 17 patients had detectable vital signs upon arrival to the ER. Fifteen patients had multisystem injuries associated with blunt trauma and two with isolated penetrating injuries. Despite maximal conventional resuscitation and ER thoracotomy, none of the 17 patients survived. In this group of pediatric blunt trauma victims who appear initially salvageable, and present in the ER with no detectable vital signs, ER resuscitative thoracotomy did not influence survival. ER thoracotomy in children, therefore, should be reserved for patients presenting with penetrating thoracic injuries or blunt injuries associated with detectable vital signs and deterioration despite maximal conventional therapy.     

Injuries of the stomach. An analysis of 95 cases

In this series the stomach was involved in 8% of patients undergoing surgical exploration for abdominal injuries (most commonly by penetrating trauma). The stomach has strong walls and these are not torn by blunt trauma unless it is severe. Such trauma commonly involves adjacent vascular organs such as the liver, spleen and pancreas, resulting in dangerous haemorrhage. Careful search of both walls of the stomach and the diaphragm, especially after penetrating blunt trauma, is mandatory if complications are to be avoided. The mortality in this series was mostly caused by associated injuries.     

Excess mortality, length of stay, and costs associated with serious hemorrhage among trauma patients: findings from the National Trauma Data Bank

Trauma is a serious injury or shock to the body from violence or crash and is an important and growing global health risk. Using 2000 to 2004 data from a comprehensive trauma registry, we estimated the prevalence of serious blunt and penetrating trauma-related hemorrhage among patients admitted to U.S. trauma centers along with excess in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay, and inpatient costs. There were 65,750 patients with blunt trauma and 12,992 patients with penetrating trauma included in our analyses. Of patients sustaining blunt trauma, 7.6 per cent had serious hemorrhage; 18.8 per cent of patients sustaining penetrating trauma had serious hemorrhage. In-hospital mortality rates were significantly (P < 0.05) higher for patients with serious hemorrhage than for patients without (24.9 per cent versus 8.4 per cent for blunt; 23.4 per cent versus 4.2 per cent for penetrating). Patients with serious hemorrhage had adjusted mean excess lengths of stay of 0.4 days for blunt trauma and 2.7 days for penetrating trauma (P < 0.05); adjusted excess costs were $296 per day for patients sustaining blunt trauma and $637 per day for patients sustaining penetrating trauma (P < 0.05). In both blunt and penetrating trauma cases, serious hemorrhage is significantly associated with excess mortality, longer hospital stays, and higher costs.     

Management of injuries to the superior mesenteric artery

From 1978 through 1984, 22 patients with 20 penetrating and two blunt injuries to the proximal superior mesenteric artery were treated. Patients presented with exsanguinating hemorrhage (19), midline hematomas (two), or 'black bowel' (one). Two other patients developed 'black bowel' during operation. Direct cutdown through the mesentery was the approach in 11 patients, and three survived; a Mattox maneuver was used in ten patients, and five survived. Complex bypass or grafting procedures were performed in nine patients, and two survived. Ten of 15 deaths were secondary to hemorrhagic shock; two of five late deaths were related to problems with the vascular repair in patients with multiple injuries. Interposition grafting near a major pancreatic injury may lead to catastrophic postoperative problems. Bypass grafts from the distal aorta should have retroperitoneal tissue coverage of the suture line.     

Percutaneous transcatheter embolization for massive bleeding from pelvic fractures

The effectiveness of transcatheter embolization was studied prospectively from January 1977 through July 1984 in 31 patients with extensive pelvic fractures, hypotension, and large retroperitoneal hematomas. The indications for angiography in patients with pelvic fractures included: four or more units of blood transfusion within 24 hours, six or more units of blood transfusion within 48 hours, negative or borderline peritoneal tap and lavage in an unstable patient, or large pelvic retroperitoneal hematoma discovered at time of celiotomy. Successful embolization with complete control of hemorrhage was achieved in 27 patients (87.1%). Overall mortality was 35.5%, but was primarily due to associated injuries. Percutaneous transcatheter embolization was the procedure of choice for controlling massive pelvic retroperitoneal hemorrhage. Early embolization was imperative in reducing transfusion requirements and associated complications.