Comparison of Southern blot hybridization and polymerase chain reaction methods for the detection of human papillomavirus DNA.

A methodologic study was performed to compare the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern blot hybridization, two commonly used testing strategies for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Three laboratories tested masked aliquots of exfoliated cervical cell specimens obtained from 120 women by cervicovaginal lavage. The study population included 32 women with condylomatous atypia or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and 88 control women with no known history of cervical neoplasia. Two laboratories used PCR with different sets of consensus primers for HPV detection. The third laboratory used low-stringency Southern blot hybridization to identify all HPV types, followed by high-stringency Southern and/or dot blot hybridization to confirm specific HPV types. One of the PCR primer sets detected HPV types with a differential efficiency that was not predicted by analysis of DNA sequences or direct testing of HPV-containing plasmids. In contrast, the second PCR primer set was shown to be a much broader consensus system, detecting the same HPV types as Southern blotting, though requiring much less clinical specimen. Over 80% of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or condylomatous atypia were found to be HPV infected both by Southern blotting and by the second PCR primer set. Among the control women, 11% were HPV positive by Southern blotting, while 31% were positive with the second set of primers. Most of the HPV infections found only by PCR were not due to HPV type 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, or 45. These known HPV types were uncommon among normal women in the study population, even as determined by the PCR method.     

Nonisotopic Detection and Typing of Human Papillomavirus DNA in Genital Samples by the Line Blot Assay

The line blot assay, a gene amplification method that combines PCR with nonisotopic detection of amplified DNA, was evaluated for its ability to detect human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in genital specimens. Processed samples were amplified with biotin-labeled primers for HPV detection (primers MY09, MY11, and HMB01) and for beta-globin detection (primers PC03 and PC04). Amplified DNA products were hybridized by a reverse blot method with oligonucleotide probe mixtures fixed on a strip that allowed the identification of 27 HPV genotypes. The line blot assay was compared to a standard consensus PCR test in which HPV amplicons were detected with radiolabeled probes in a dot blot assay. Two hundred fifty-five cervicovaginal lavage specimens and cervical scrapings were tested in parallel by both PCR tests. The line blot assay consistently detected 25 copies of HPV type 18 per run. The overall positivity for the DNA of HPV types detectable by both methods was 37.7% (96 of 255 samples) by the line blot assay, whereas it was 43. 5% (111 of 255 samples) by the standard consensus PCR assay. The sensitivity and specificity of the line blot assay reached 84.7% (94 of 111 samples) and 98.6% (142 of 144 samples), respectively. The agreement for HPV typing between the two PCR assays reached 83.9% (214 of 255 samples). Of the 37 samples with discrepant results, 33 (89%) were resolved by avoiding coamplification of beta-globin and modifying the amplification parameters. With these modifications, the line blot assay compared favorably to an assay that used radiolabeled probes. Its convenience allows the faster analysis of samples for large-scale epidemiological studies. Also, the increased probe spectrum in this single hybridization assay permits more complete type discrimination.     

Detection and typing of human papillomavirus using the Vira Type "in situ" kit: comparison with a conventional dot blot technique

A new commercial kit (Vira Type "in situ", Life Technologies, Inc., Molecular Diagnostics Division, Guithersburg, Maryland, USA) for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33 and 35 in routinely processed human anogenital tissue was compared with a conventional dot blot assay for HPV 6, 11, 16 and 18. Both systems use double-stranded genomic DNA probes for the detection of type specific HPV DNA. The probes used on the dot blots were labelled with 32P and visualised autoradiographically. The Vira Type probes were labelled with biotin and visualised using a streptavidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate with NBT-BCIP substrate. Biopsy specimens from the cervix, vagina, and vulva of 46 women were processed by both methods and compared. The histological diagnoses ranged from benign changes, to dysplasia, and invasive carcinoma. Overall, 50% of biopsy specimens were positive for HPV DNA by dot blot hybridisation; only 39% were positive by Vira Type in situ hybridisation. Three of the specimens positive by the Vira Type "in situ" kit showed no cross hybridisation and were the same HPV type as the dot blot. A further 13 showed hybridisation, but the showed cross hybridisation, but the to the dot blot results. One biopsy specimen was positive for different HPV types by the two tests and one was positive by Vira Type and negative by dot blot. Six biopsy specimens were negative by Vira Type but positive by dot blot. It is concluded that the Vira Type "in situ" kit has a similar specificity but lower sensitivity than the dot blot hybridisation method for the detection of HPV DNA.     

Human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping using paired exfoliated cervicovaginal cells and paraffin-embedded tissues to highlight difficulties in attributing HPV types to specific lesions

Defining type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) infections within cervical tissues is important for understanding the pathogenesis of cervical neoplasia and assessing the effectiveness of prophylactic vaccines with limited type-specific spectra. We compared HPV DNA-testing results from 146 matched exfoliated-cell and formalin-fixed-tissue specimens collected by cervicovaginal lavage (CVL) within 90 days of each other from women with histologically confirmed cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN). The CVL specimens were HPV typed using a MY09/11 L1 consensus primer PCR method followed by dot blot hybridization. The tissue specimens were HPV typed using an SPF(10) line probe assay HPV detection system. Of the 146 specimen pairs with evidence of CIN in the tissue, 91.8% were positive for one or more HPV types in both the tissue and cellular specimens. Tissue sections were more likely to be HPV negative (P < 0.01). Typing directly from tissue sections resolved multiple infections detected in exfoliated cells to a single HPV type in only 46.9% of cases. Combined use of both specimen types to attribute lesions to HPV type 16 (HPV-16) and/or -18 led to 43.1% attributed to HPV-16 and/or -18 by both specimen types and 19.9% attributed to HPV-16 and/or -18 by one, but not both, specimen types. Unambiguous attribution of cervical lesions to a single, specific HPV type remains a difficult proposition. Use of multiple specimen types or the development of highly sensitive and robust in situ hybridization HPV-testing methods to evaluate the certainty of attribution of lesions to HPV types might provide insights in future efforts, including HPV vaccine trials.     

Detection of multiple human papillomavirus types in the lower genital tract correlates with cervical dysplasia

Some human papillomavirus (HPV) types, such as HPV 16, are clearly associated with cervical dysplasia; however, the role played by other HPV types occasionally found in dysplasia is less certain. In addition, most methods used to detect HPV in clinical specimens cannot easily distinguish among more than two or three HPV types in a single specimen. Therefore, the significance of infection with multiple HPV types is not known. To address this question, we analyzed cervicovaginal lavage specimens from three cohorts of women for HPV DNA using a PCR/reverse blot assay system that permits the detection and partial quantitation of 26 genital HPV types. As expected, 94.1% of women who had dysplasia (n = 34) and 71.4% of women who had atypical squamous cells of uncertain significance (ASCUS) (n = 21) on cytology had HPV DNA detected compared to 54.5% of age matched women with normal cytology. HPV 16 DNA was detected in 35% of dysplasia patients compared to 9% of cytologic normals (P = 0.0044). Dysplasia patients had a mean of 3.29 (range 0-10) different HPV types detected compared to 1.04 (range 0-7) HPV types among those with normal cytology (P < 0.0001). These data support a possible role for multiple HPV types in the development or progression of cervical dysplasia.     

Comparison of the hybrid capture tube test and PCR for detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cervical specimens.

The strong association of human papillomavirus (HPV) and cervical cancer makes it important to study HPV detection methods that may play a role in cervical cancer screening. We compared two DNA methods that are commonly used for HPV research in the United States: the MY09/MY11 L1 consensus primer PCR-based test and the first-generation Hybrid Capture tube method (HCT). Laboratory assays by each method were performed with 596 cervicovaginal specimens collected from participants in a large cohort study conducted in Portland, Oreg. Included were 499 specimens from women whose cytology was normal and 97 specimens from women with squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs). The overall HPV DNA positivity for known types was 22.5% by PCR compared to 13.6% by HCT. When the analysis was restricted to the 14 HPV types detectable by both methods, the sensitivity of HCT, with PCR used as the standard for HPV status, was higher for specimens from women with concurrent SILs (81.0%) than for specimens from women with normal cytology (46.7%). Among specimens testing positive by both methods, 97.2% of the time the two methods agreed on whether specimens were positive for cancer-associated HPV types. Both of these HPV test methods provide information that supplements the information provided by the Pap smear. The PCR method has higher analytic sensitivity than HCT in detecting HPV, but HCT may be helpful in identifying women with concurrent SILs.     

Comparison of Southern transfer hybridization and dot filter hybridization for detection of cervical human papillomavirus infection with types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35

A commercial dot filter hybridization kit (Virapap Kit) was compared with Southern transfer hybridization for the detection of seven types of human papillomavirus (HPV) in cervical specimens from 450 consecutive females attending a sexually transmitted diseases clinic. In comparison with Southern transfer hybridization, performed with the same probes used in the dot filter kit, the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of dot filter hybridization were 90%, 94%, 74%, and 98%, respectively. Among patients with cervical cytologic dysplasia, HPV DNA was detected in 44% by dot filter hybridization and in 35% by Southern transfer hybridization. Although 26% of specimens positive by dot filter hybridization were not confirmed by Southern transfer hybridization, cervical dysplasia was detected in 5 (25%) of 20 with HPV DNA detected by dot filter hybridization alone, compared with 25 (8%) of those with no definitive evidence of HPV by either method (P = 0.009) and with 16 (30%) of 53 with HPV DNA detected by both methods (P = 0.7). The kappa statistic for interobserver and intraobserver reproducibility for interpretation of blots was similar for the two methods. The dot filter hybridization method evaluated appears to be a satisfactory alternative to Southern transfer hybridization for detection of HPV DNA.     

Diagnosis of community-acquired pertussis infection: comparison of both culture and fluorescent-antibody assays with PCR detection using electrophoresis or dot blot hybridization

Diagnosis of Bordetella pertussis infection has been difficult due to the low sensitivity of culture. PCR tests have been shown to be more sensitive than culture, but the reported sensitivity of PCR is variable. We evaluated PCR product detection by using either agarose gel electrophoresis (PCR-gel) or dot blot hybridization with (32)P-labeled oligonucleotide probes, and we compared these methods to both culture and direct fluorescent-antibody (DFA) assays with microscopy for the detection of pertussis. This was done with 225 nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected in community clinic settings. The multiplexed PCR amplified the multiply repeated IS481 B. pertussis sequence and a sequence from the human globin gene as a positive control for specimen adequacy. Of 225 specimens, 179 were judged to be adequate for PCR analysis. Among the adequate specimens, 9, 4, and 10 were culture, DFA, and PCR-gel positive, respectively. The sensitivity of PCR-gel versus culture was 89% while the sensitivity of culture versus PCR-gel was 80%. DFA had the lowest sensitivity. Thirty specimens were positive by PCR with dot blot hybridization; no negative control specimens showed a signal above the background. Among the 79 (44%) adequate specimens with clinical data available, the rates of reported cough or persistent cough were similar for persons who were pertussis positive by each assay. The IS481 PCR, with either electrophoresis or dot blot hybridization, is a sensitive assay; however, at this time it cannot completely replace culture without an overall loss in sensitivity for the detection of pertussis. Further study is required to understand the clinical significance of B. pertussis PCR products detected by dot blot hybridization alone.     

Detection of human papillomavirus in reprocessed routine Papanicolaou smears by DNA hybridization

DNA dot blot hybridization was used for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) types 6, 11, 16, and 18 in reprocessed routinely collected Papanicolaou smears. DNA was extracted from the smears with alkaline lysis and applied onto a nitrocellulose filter. The specificity and sensitivity of the dot blot hybridization on reprocessed Papanicolaou smears were confirmed by Southern blot analysis of selected samples, using CaSki, SiHa cell lines as positive controls and HF 32 as negative controls. From 42 normal smears and 44 abnormal smears with koilocytosis present, 9 (21%) and 43 (98%), respectively, were positive for HPV 6/11/16 or 18. These results show that reprocessed Papanicolaou smears in combination with DNA hybridization have potential application in retrospective studies on the prevalence and distribution of HPV infection.     

Detection of human papillomavirus on Papanicolaou-stained cervical smears using indirect in situ polymerase chain reaction hybridization

OBJECTIVE: Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and indirect in situ hybridization were combined to detect human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA on Papanicolaou (PAP)-stained cervical smears. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an experiment using indirect in situ PCR (IS-PCR) on PAP-stained cervical smears. DESIGN: We collected native cell specimens from cervicovaginal lavage of 162 patients with squamous intraepithelial lesions. Solution-phase PCR (SP-PCR) was performed as the reference method in the detection of HPV DNA. Indirect IS-PCR was carried out for the same patients to detect the HPV DNA types 6/11 and 16/18 after the PAP-stained smears had been decolorized. Low-risk and high-risk HPV DNA types were also detected by both SP-PCR and indirect IS-PCR. RESULTS: In the evaluation by indirect IS-PCR, 48 of 81 PAP-stained cell smears of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions were positive for HPV DNA, as compared to 40 positive cell smears determined by indirect SP-PCR (sensitivity of indirect IS-PCR compared to SP-PCR, 98.1%). Forty-two of 42 high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion samples were positive for HPV DNA, as determined by both methods (sensitivity of IS-PCR, 100%). Cell lines investigated in this study as positive or negative controls for HPV DNA were confirmed by indirect IS-PCR and SP-PCR. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that in comparison to SP-PCR, indirect IS-PCR is a highly sensitive method to detect HPV DNA in cell smears from the uterine cervix. The advantages of indirect IS-PCR are (a) low numbers of cells needed, (b) the possibility of using PAP-stained specimens, and (c) cytologic details of smears can be preserved.     

Detection of adeno-associated virus DNA in female genital samples by PCR-ELISA

Adeno-associated viruses (AAV) are human parvoviruses that require helper function for their replication. Several studies have demonstrated that AAV DNA sequences can be found in the female genital tract but the incidence of infection seems very variable. A PCR-ELISA method detecting AAV DNA was developed for combining the specificity and the sensitivity of conventional PCR with an objective interpretation of the results. In the PCR-ELISA, a defined number of cells from cervical specimens were digested and amplified with concomitant digoxigenin labeling. Digoxigenin-labeled amplified products hybridized to a specific biotinylated probe were captured in streptavidin-coated microtiter wells by a biotin-streptavidin binding and were visualized by colorimetric immunoenzymatic reaction. PCR-ELISA was carried out in 110 cervical cytological specimens of women with or without the concomitant detectable presence of papillomavirus (HPV) DNA and the results were compared with those obtained by conventional PCR followed by dot blot hybridization. When compared to conventional PCR considered as reference standard, PCR-ELISA was found to be 98% sensitive and 96% specific. Out of the total 110 samples examined, 52.7% were positive for AAV DNA by both techniques, demonstrating a high prevalence of AAV infection in the uterine cervix. When analyzing samples with or without the presence of HPV DNA, 63.2 % of the samples were positive for HPV DNA and 41.5% of the samples were negative for HPV proved positive for AAV DNA by both PCR-ELISA and conventional PCR. Hence, PCR-ELISA, which can be completed in 1 day, proved to be a reliable method for an objective detection of AAV DNA in clinical samples. The present study showed a frequent infection of the cervical epithelium with AAV both in the presence and absence of HPV infection.     

Human papillomavirus detection by hybrid capture in paired cervicovaginal lavage and cervical biopsy specimens

Infection of the uterine cervix with human papillomavirus (HPV) is associated with dysplastic lesions that may progress to malignancy. Certain HPV types are associated with higher risk of cervical cancer than other genital HPVs. The goal of this study was to determine if cells obtained by cervicovaginal lavage contain similar HPV types as paired cervical biopsy in women referred because of abnormal cervical cytology. Thirty-four paired lavage and biopsy samples were analyzed for HPV DNA by hybrid capture, using “low risk” (HPV types 6. 11, and related types and “high risk” group (HPV types 16, 18, and related types) HPV. HPV was detected in 24 lavage samples and 18 biopsies. High risk types were predominant. In 14 of 18 HPV-positive biopsies, the paired lavage was also positive for the same HPV group. Four biopsies were HPV-positive at low levels, and the paired lavage was HPV-negative. The mean viral copy numbers of the biopsies from patients with positive and negative lavage samples were 2.7 and 0.1, respectively (P = .02). Ten low level HPV infections were detected by lavage that were not detected by biopsy. HPV detection by hybrid capture in cells obtained by cervicovaginal lavage reflects the results of HPV testing in cervical biopsies. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Primary screening for high risk HPV by home obtained cervicovaginal lavage is an alternative screening tool for unscreened women

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Self sampling is considered an adjuvant tool to facilitate the participation of women in cervical cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to evaluate whether cervicovaginal lavage could be an alternative for the cervical smear in cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and to assess the acceptance of the self sampling device by women. METHODS: Fifty six women with abnormal cervical cytology (very mild dyskaryosis or worse) and 15 women with normal cervical cytology obtained a self collected cervicovaginal lavage at home and filled in a questionnaire on the use of the device. At the colposcopy clinic the gynaecologist performed the same procedure followed by a cervical smear for cytology and HPV DNA testing. RESULTS: The self sampling device was acceptable to 88% of the women. The concordance between the cytology results in the smear and the lavage by the doctor and the patient was 54% and 41%, respectively (kappa = 0.28 and 0.14). The concordance between high risk HPV detection in the smear and the lavage by the doctor and the patient was 93% and 78%, respectively (kappa = 0.82 and 0.53). Ninety one per cent of the women with high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) had a high risk HPV positive test in the smear, compared with 91% and 81% in the lavages taken by the doctor and the patient, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: HPV DNA testing by home obtained samples is useful as a screening tool for cervical cancer, whereas cervical cytology by self sampling is not. Although the sensitivity for high grade CIN by high risk HPV testing in the lavage by the patient is not significantly lower than that in the cervical smear, self sampling for HPV DNA is a feasible alternative method in women who decline to participate in population based cervical cancer screening programmes. However, participation in the screening programme remains the best option.     

Detection of HPV-16 in cell lines and cervical lavage specimens by a polymerase chain reaction-enzyme immunoassay assay.

A gene amplification method that combines the polymerase chain reaction with detection of amplified DNA in a solution hybridization/enzyme immunoassay (PCR-EIA) was developed for HPV-16 DNA. Samples were amplified with primers for the E7-E1 region of HPV-16. Amplified DNA products were identified and quantitated by hybridization in solution with a biotinylated RNA probe. Labeled DNA/RNA hybrids were measured semiquantitatively in an enzyme immunoassay using solid phase anti-biotin antibody and liquid phase B-d-galactosidase labeled monoclonal antibody against DNA-RNA hybrids. Enzyme bound to the solid phase was quantitated with a fluorogenic substrate. The assay was linear over 2 log10 dilutions of SiHa cells and the detection limit was three copies of HPV-16 genome. The sensitivity of PCR-EIA for detection of PCR amplified products compared favorably with slot and Southern blots using a 32P-labeled RNA probe. The assay was used to assess HPV-16 infection of uterine cervix in women attending a clinic for sexually transmitted diseases. Twenty-one of the 81 specimens (25.9%), obtained by cervicovaginal lavage, were positive for HPV-16 by PCR-EIA. The assay provides a convenient means to objectively measure HPV DNA amplified with PCR.     

Nucleic acid sandwich hybridization in detection of HPV 16 DNA: technique and its clinical application

Nucleic acid sandwich hybridization technique was used for detection of HPV 16 specific DNA in cervical scrapes. Alternating HPV 16-PstI fragments were cloned into plasmid pBR322 and phage M13mp10. pBR322-clones were used as 32P-labelled probe reagents and the M13mp10 clones as catching reagents in the assay. The detection limit of the test proved to be 1-5 X 10(5) HPV 16 molecules per test. A weak cross reaction was seen with HPV 31 DNA but not with the other types tested, e.g. HPV 6, 11, 18 and 33. Cervical scrapings obtained from 163 consecutive patients included in a prospective follow up study were analyzed for HPV 16 DNA with the sandwich hybridization method, dot-blot hybridization being used as a reference method. Sandwich hybridization assay detected 25 positive cases out of 163 specimens (15.3%). Of these 6 and 3 additional specimens were positive in dot-blot hybridization assay. HPV 16 DNA was related to higher PAP grades, and HPV 16 appeared more frequently in HPV CIN than HPV NCIN lesions. None of the infections caused by HPV 16 regressed, and 24% progressed during the follow up.     

Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 and 52b in cervical cancer tissues by Southern blot hybridization and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)

DNA samples from cancer tissues diagnosed histologically as squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were examined for the presence of human papillomavirus (HPV) genome DNA by Southern blot hybridization. Of 63 specimens, 32 were found to hybridize with HPV DNA probes; 23 specimens (35%) with HPV type 16 (HPV16), one (2%) with HPV type 18 (HPV18), four (7%) with HPV type 52b (HPV52b), and four others (7%) weakly with HPV52b. Specimens negative for HPV DNA with Southern blot hybridization were subjected to polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to determine the presence of HPV DNA under more sensitive conditions. After PCR using one set of primers specific for HPV16 and HPV52b, 7 out of 31 specimens were found to have HPV16 DNA. None was positive for HPV52b DNA. Our results indicate that HPV52b, as well as HPV16 and HPV18, is associated with squamous cell carcinoma of uterine cervix, and more sensitive determination of HPV infection can be made by amplification of the viral genome by PCR.     

Human papillomavirus genomes in male urethral cells.

Sixty-four samples of urethral cells from male sexual partners of women with genital human papillomavirus (HPV) infection were analyzed for the presence of HPV types 6, 11, 16, and 18 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) followed by slot blot hybridization. Additional samples from 37 of these subjects were analyzed for the presence of viral cytopathic effects by conventional cytology. By PCR, HPV DNA was detected in 21% (14/64) of samples. By cytology, 16% (6/37) of the samples showed cellular changes consistent with HPV infection. Polymerase chain reaction and cytology results were concordant for presence and absence of HPV in 5 and 28 cases, respectively. Three additional HPV-positive cases were obtained with PCR in the cytologically negative samples. The cytologic abnormalities were found to be associated with the presence of both low-risk HPV types and meatal acetoreactivity. On the contrary, HPV DNA positivity by PCR was unrelated to viral type and peniscopic findings. Urethral HPV infection was detected by PCR in 30% of males with visible penile lesions and in 18% of those without. These results indicate that PCR analysis of urethral samples is a helpful adjunct to cytology for the detection of HPV DNA in absence of cytologic evidence of infection.     

Use of PGMY primers in L1 consensus PCR improves detection of human papillomavirus DNA in genital samples

The novel PGMY L1 consensus primer pair is more sensitive than the MY09 and MY11 primer mix for detection and typing with PCR of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in genital specimens. We assessed the diagnostic yield of PGMY primers for the detection and typing of HPV by comparing the results obtained with PGMY09/PGMY11 and MY09/MY11/HMB01 on 299 genital samples. Amplicons generated with PGMY primers were typed with the line blot assay (PGMY-line blot), while HPV amplicons obtained with the degenerate primer pool MY09/MY11/HMB01 were detected with type-specific radiolabeled probes in a dot blot assay (standard consensus PCR test). Cervicovaginal lavage samples (N = 272) and cervical scrape samples (N = 27) were tested in parallel with both PCR tests. The PGMY-line blot test detected the presence of HPV DNA more frequently than the standard consensus PCR assay. The concordance for HPV typing between the two assays was 84.3% (214 of 255 samples), for a good kappa value of 0.69. Of the 177 samples containing HPV DNA by at least one method, 40 samples contained at least one HPV type detected only with PGMY-line blot, whereas positivity exclusively with the standard consensus PCR test was found for only 7 samples (P < 0.001). HPV types 45 and 52 were especially more frequently detected with PGMY than MY primers. However, most HPV types were better amplified with PGMY primers, including HPV-16. Samples with discordant results between the two PCR assays more frequently contained multiple HPV types. Studies using PGMY instead of MY primers have the potential to report higher detection rates of HPV infection not only for newer HPV types but also for well-known genital types.     

Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes in cervico-vaginal scrapes of women with normal and abnormal cytology

Background   Certain types of human papillomavirus (HPV) are associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical carcinoma. The study addressed the expression and detection of HPV genotypes in cervical and vaginal specimens of women with normal and abnormal cytology by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), each woman serving as her own control.
Methods   Study participants (127) were subgrouped into CIN-positive and CIN-negative, based on cytology screening, and endocervical and vaginal scrapes were collected by a gynecologist and placed immediately in saline. HPV DNA was assessed by PCR, and HPV genotypes were determined by hybridization of PCR products with type-specific biotinylated probes.
Results   Of the 127 participants, 55 tested positive and 72 tested negative for HPV DNA. While there was no difference between the two groups with regards to age or to number of pregnancies, higher numbers of smokers and of women with multiple sexual partners and abnormal cytology were seen in the HPV-positive group ( P  < 0.001). HPV DNA was detected in the vaginal scrapes of all HPV-positive, but in none of the HPV-negative women (sensitivity and specificity = 1.0). Furthermore, the HPV genotype was the same in vaginal and endocervical specimens in all the HPV-positive women.
Conclusion   HPV detection by PCR, using endocervical or vaginal sampling, is a sensitive and highly specific test for the identification of HPV infection, in particular in women with cytomorphologically normal cervices.     

Diagnostic sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction and Southern blot hybridization for the detection of human papillomavirus DNA in biopsy specimens from cervical lesions.

Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are associated with benign and malignant neoplasms of the cervix. One of the criteria for their etiologic role requires an assessment of whether virtually all or only a small fraction of lesions contain viral genomes. DNA preparations from colposcopically directed punch biopsies of cervical lesions were analyzed by Southern blot hybridization and the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for the presence of HPV DNA. The biopsy specimens represented different pathologic entities (koilocytosis, condyloma, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, and invasive carcinoma). In Southern blot hybridization with radioactive probes for HPV 11, 16, 18, 31, and 33, HPV DNA was detected in 74% of the biopsy specimens (42 of 57 cases), with the predominant types being HPV 16 and HPV 18. In contrast, after PCR amplification with primers yielding fragments of characteristic size for HPV 11, 16, and 18, the analysis of the same 57 biopsy specimens revealed that all samples were positive for at least one HPV type. To exclude false-positive PCR results, controls without HPV DNA were interspersed at regular intervals, and results were evaluated only if these controls remained HPV negative. To exclude false-negative results due to failure of the reaction, a target sequence within the c-Ha-ras-1 gene was used as an internal control. All HPV typing results obtained by Southern blot hybridization were in agreement with HPV typing by PCR. The higher number of positive samples in the latter analysis stems from the increased sensitivity of PCR, which was which was effective in identifying as few as 10-100 HPV DNA molecules; in contrast, the sensitivity of Southern blot hybridization was 1 pg, or approximately 10(5) molecules of HPV DNA. The authors conclude that, with sufficiently sensitive diagnostic methods, HPV DNA can be detected in most, if not all, neoplastic cervical lesions.