Clinical usefulness of electrophysiologic study (EPS)-guided risk stratification for life-threatening arrhythmia in patients with heart failure

BACKGROUND: Ventricular tachyarrhythmia is one of the most important factors determining the prognosis of patients with heart failure and sudden death can be observed even during stable therapy controlling clinical heart failure. In this study, the usefulness of electrophysiologic study (EPS) for the prediction of a future arrhythmic event was evaluated in patients with heart failure. METHODS AND RESULTS: The patient population consisted of 474 patients with a history of clinical heart failure but without an episode of spontaneous sustained ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation (VT/VF). A Holter ECG was performed in all patients, and 177 of the 474 patients underwent EPS because of a recording of nonsustained VT (NSVT, > 5 beats). When sustained VT/VF was inducible in EPS, the patient was assigned to implantation of a defibrillation device. The patients were divided into 3 groups, ie, 1) no NSVT (n = 297), 2) NSVT + no inducible VT/VF (n = 134), and 3) NSVT + inducible VT/VF (n = 43), and were followed-up for > 12 months. All patients were followed-up under standard therapy for heart failure. There were no significant differences in basic clinical characteristics and therapies among the 3 groups. During the follow-up period of 32 +/- 18 months, 56/474 patients suffered a VT/VF episode, ie, 21/297 in no NSVT, 14/134 in NSVT + no inducible VT/VF, and 21/43 in NSVT + inducible VT/VF patients (P = 0.032). All patients were rescued from sudden death among patients with an implanted defibrillator, but 11 patients without a defibrillator died. CONCLUSION: In patients with heart failure, future arrhythmic events could be predicted by EPS and Holter ECG. EPS-guided risk stratification seems to be useful in managing patients with heart failure.     

Clinical significance of the electrophysiologic study (EPS)-guided therapy for the secondary prevention of ventricular tachycardia.

BACKGROUND: Although electrophysiologic study (EPS) is one of the most reliable methods for selecting preventive therapy for patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), VT may recur during EPS-guided effective therapy; therefore, the importance of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) has been emphasized. In this study, the prognoses of VT patients were evaluated to clarify the importance of EPS-guided therapy for the secondary prevention of VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 99 consecutive patients with a history of sustained VT, which was inducible in EPS. The VT induction protocol used 1-3 extrastimuli and rapid ventricular pacing at 2 right ventricular sites and included additional isoproterenol infusion. ICD implantation was applied to all patients with an episode of hemodynamically unstable VT, regardless of the result of preventive therapy. For preventive therapy, an antiarrhythmic drug and/or catheter ablation were selected, and they were defined as being effective in the EPS-guided therapy when the induction of VT was completely prevented. When no therapy was effective for prevention, an antiarrhythmic drug was prescribed under ICD implantation. During the follow-up period of 19+/-20 months, VT recurred in 17 of 32 patients (53%) in the ineffective group and in 10 of 67 patients (15%) in the effective group (p=0.0001). The therapies used in the effective group were class I antiarrhythmic drug in 9, class III in 15, and catheter ablation in 35 patients. Between the patients with and without VT recurrence, there were no significant differences in the left ventricular ejection fraction and the maximum number of repetitive ventricular responses that remained in VT induction in EPS. CONCLUSIONS: Although VT may recur in up to 15% of patients with EPS-guided effective therapy, the recurrence rate was significantly reduced in comparison to that in the ineffective group. EPS-guided therapy may be useful to reduce the clinical recurrence of VT, as well as the action of ICD.     

Role of triple extrastimuli during electrophysiologic study of patients with documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in 172 consecutive patients for evaluation of documented sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. One hundred thirteen patients presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia that was hemodynamically stable, and 59 patients presented with cardiac arrest. Seventy-one patients without previously documented or suspected ventricular arrhythmias were also studied to determine the specificity of our electrophysiologic study protocol. The stimulation protocol included single, double, and triple right ventricular extrastimuli and rapid ventricular pacing at multiple cycle lengths performed at one or more right ventricular sites. Stimulation was performed at one or more left ventricular sites in patients with documented spontaneous arrhythmias when right ventricular programmed stimulation failed to induce sustained ventricular tachycardia. Ventricular tachyarrhythmias were induced in 110 (97%) of the patients who presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia, in 48 (81%) of the patients who presented with cardiac arrest, and in 28 (40%) of the patients without documented spontaneous arrhythmias. Right ventricular triple extrastimuli induced tachycardia in 22% of patients who presented with sustained ventricular tachycardia vs 46% of those who presented with cardiac arrest (p less than .001). Left ventricular stimulation was required for tachycardia induction in 3% of patients with stable tachycardia vs 19% of those with cardiac arrest (p less than .01). Triple extrastimuli induced 57% of tachycardias in the 28 patients without spontaneous arrhythmias, and virtually all of these tachycardias were polymorphic and nonsustained. The cycle lengths of tachycardias induced in each group by double and triple extrastimuli were similar, but the tachycardias induced in patients with cardiac arrest were significantly faster than those induced in the ventricular tachycardia group (mean cycle length 218 vs 291 msec, p less than .001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Determinants of the outcome of electrophysiologic study in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias

To determine those factors predictive of the ability to both initiate and suppress ventricular tachyarrhythmias during electrophysiologic study, the results of programmed cardiac stimulation were evaluated in 261 patients: 66 presenting with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia, 91 with sustained ventricular tachycardia and 104 with ventricular fibrillation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presenting arrhythmia was a potent and independent predictor of the ability to provoke ventricular arrhythmias at electrophysiologic study; a history of myocardial infarction and male sex were also significant independent predictors. Of patients presenting with sustained ventricular tachycardia, 89% (81 of 91) had inducible ventricular arrhythmias compared with 61 (40 of 66) and 66% (69 of 104) of patients with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, respectively. Complete suppression of inducible arrhythmias could be achieved in only 52% (34 of 66) of patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia, compared with 73 (24 of 33) and 75% (46 of 61) of patients presenting with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the major independent determinants of the ability to suppress inducible arrhythmias were the number of drug trials performed before electrophysiologic study (inversely correlated) and the nature of the induced arrhythmia. The nature of the presenting clinical arrhythmia is, therefore, a highly significant and independent predictor of the ability to induce ventricular arrhythmias during electrophysiologic testing and an important determinant of the ability to suppress induced arrhythmias in patients with spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Is a baseline electrophysiologic study mandatory for the management of patients with spontaneous, sustained, ventricular tachyarrhythmias?

Should the patient being treated for spontaneous, sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) routinely undergo a baseline, diagnostic, catheter electrophysiologic (EP) study? The potential patient advantages of such a policy include identification of the tachyarrhythmia-initiating episodes of presumed VT or VF, prediction of the subsequent risk of VT/VF recurrences, identification of VT mechanisms amenable to cure by catheter ablation, assessment of the response of a patient's VT to attempts at pace termination, evaluation of the patient's candidacy for some of the approaches to VT/VF therapy selection, and enhancement of our understanding of the mechanisms and therapeutics of VT/VF. Disadvantages of such a policy include patient discomfort, patient risks, and cost. Recognizing that the decision to perform a baseline catheter EP study in a patient with VT/VF must be based on an individualized, patient-based, risk-benefit analysis; this review details each of the advantages and disadvantages of doing so to identify patient populations for whom a baseline catheter EP study is or is not usually indicated.     

Enhanced survival in patients with heart failure and life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Previous reports have suggested that patients with heart failure and coexistent ventricular tachyarrhythmias have a 1-year mortality of 40% to 60%. To assess whether an antiarrhythmic management program could reduce mortality, we studied 20 consecutive patients with ventricular fibrillation (12) or ventricular tachycardia (eight) and heart failure. Coronary disease was the most common underlying cardiac disorder (85%). Heart failure was managed with digoxin (16), diuretics (16), and vasodilators (seven). All patients received antiarrhythmic drug therapy guided by both noninvasive and invasive studies. This included single (10) or combination drug therapy (10). Beta blockers were used alone or in combination for arrhythmia control in 11 patients. One-year survival was 89%. We conclude that an effective program can be developed for patients with life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias and heart failure. Combination antiarrhythmic drug therapy is often required. Despite impaired left ventricular function, beta-blocking drugs can be used, and may be important.     

Usefulness of electrophysiologic testing in evaluation of amiodarone therapy for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with coronary heart disease

The prognostic importance of electrophysiologic studies in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with amiodarone was prospectively studied in 100 consecutive patients. Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) was inducible in all patients before amiodarone therapy. After amiodarone administration 2 groups of patients were identified. In group 1 patients the ventricular tachyarrhythmia was no longer inducible and in group 2 patients the arrhythmia remained inducible. In group 1, no recurrent arrhythmia occurred during a follow-up of 18 +/- 10 months. In group 2, 38 of 80 patients (48%) had arrhythmia recurrence during a follow-up of 12 +/- 9 months. The difference between group 1 and 2 could not be explained by clinical variables, amiodarone doses or plasma concentrations, or electrocardiographic variables. In patients in whom cardiovascular collapse or other severe symptoms where noted during electrophysiologic study after amiodarone treatment, recurrences caused sudden death (n = 12). However, in patients in whom the induced arrhythmia produced moderate symptoms, the recurrent arrhythmia was nonfatal VT (n = 26). Electrophysiologic testing provides clinical guidance and predicts prognosis in patients treated with amiodarone as it does for the evaluation of other antiarrhythmic agents.     

The role of the transvenous catheter electrophysiologic study in the evaluation and management of ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with ischemic heart disease

The transvenous-catheter electrophysiologic (EP) study has occupied a central position in the investigation and management of patients with ischemic heart disease and a propensity to ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF) for more than 25 years. However, demonstration of the superiority of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) compared to other approaches to the management of VT/VF has resulted in a decrease in the frequency of use of the EP study in these patients. Nevertheless, the EP study remains a value-added procedure for many patients in this setting. These advantages include demonstration that the clinical arrhythmia is VT/VF when the diagnosis is uncertain, identification of those patients whose VT/VF is actually the result of a supraventricular tachyarrhythmia, identification of VT mechanisms readily amenable to catheter ablation, assessment of the response of a patient's VT to attempts at pace-termination, evaluation of candidacy for ablative VT therapy, prediction of the efficacy of approaches to prevention of VT/VF episodes, risk stratification of patients who have not yet experienced a sustained episode of VT/VF, and continued enhancement of our understanding of the mechanisms and therapeutics of VT/VF. The purpose of this review is to outline our present understanding of the techniques and indications for an EP study in patients with ischemic heart disease.     

Role of orthotopic heart transplantation in the management of patients with recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias following myocardial infarction

Objective—To report the outcome of an intention to treat by heart transplantation strategy in two groups of patients after infarction, one with both left ventricular failure (LVF) and ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTA) (group A) and the other with progressive LVF following antiarrhythmic surgery for VTA (group B).
Patients and methods—Group A comprised 17 consecutive patients for whom transplantation was considered the best primary non-pharmacological treatment; group B comprised five consecutive patients assessed and planned for transplantation after antiarrhythmic surgery.
Results—In group A, eight patients underwent transplantation and all survived the first 30 day period. At median follow up of 55 months (range 11 to 109) seven of this subgroup were still alive. Five patients died of recurrent VTA before transplantation, despite circulatory support. In the face of uncontrollable VTA, four of these underwent "high risk" antiarrhythmic surgery while awaiting transplantation: three died of LVF within 30 days and one was saved by heart transplantation two days after arrhythmia surgery. Mortality for the transplantation strategy in group A patients was 47% by intention to treat analysis. Quality of life in the eight actually transplanted, however, was good and only one died during median follow up of 56 months. The five patients in group B were accepted for transplantation for progressive LVF at a median of 21 months (range 12 to 28) after antiarrhythmic surgery. One died of LVF before transplantation, 22 months after initial surgery; another died of high output LVF three days after transplantation. Thus mortality of the intended strategy was 40%. The three transplanted patients are alive and well at 8-86 months.
Conclusions—Although the short and medium term outcome in category A or B patients who undergo transplantation is good, the overall success of the transplantation strategy in category A patients is limited by lack of donors in the short time frame in which they are required.

Keywords: heart transplantation;  ventricular arrhythmias;  myocardial infarction     

Cardiac resynchronization therapy for the treatment of heart failure in patients with intraventricular conduction delay and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to assess the safety and effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) when combined with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). BACKGROUND: Long-term outcome of CRT was measured in patients with symptomatic heart failure (HF), intraventricular conduction delay, and malignant ventricular tachyarrhythmias (ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation [VT/VF]) requiring therapy from an ICD. METHODS: Patients (n = 490) were implanted with a device capable of providing both CRT and ICD therapy and randomized to CRT (n = 245) or control (no CRT, n = 245) for up to six months. The primary end point was progression of HF, defined as all-cause mortality, hospitalization for HF, and VT/VF requiring device intervention. Secondary end points included peak oxygen consumption (VO(2)), 6-min walk (6 MW), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life (QOL), and echocardiographic analysis. RESULTS: A 15% reduction in HF progression was observed, but this was statistically insignificant (p = 0.35). The CRT, however, significantly improved peak VO(2) (0.8 ml/kg/min vs. 0.0 ml/kg/min, p = 0.030) and 6 MW (35 m vs. 15 m, p = 0.043). Changes in NYHA class (p = 0.10) and QOL (p = 0.40) were not statistically significant. The CRT demonstrated significant reductions in ventricular dimensions (left ventricular internal diameter in diastole = -3.4 mm vs. -0.3 mm, p < 0.001 and left ventricular internal diameter in systole = -4.0 mm vs. -0.7 mm, p < 0.001) and improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (5.1% vs. 2.8%, p = 0.020). A subgroup of patients with advanced HF (NYHA class III/IV) consistently demonstrated improvement across all functional status end points. CONCLUSIONS: The CRT improved functional status in patients indicated for an ICD who also have symptomatic HF and intraventricular conduction delay.     

The electrophysiologic effects of enoximone in patients with preexisting ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Electrophysiologic and hemodynamic effects of intravenous enoximone were studied in 15 male patients, mean age 62.2 years, with New York Heart Association classes II to IV congestive heart failure (coronary artery disease in 10 and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in five patients; mean ejection fraction, 0.19). All patients had spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias; eight had sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT), one had ventricular fibrillation, and six had nonsustained VT. Hemodynamic and electrophysiologic parameters including VT induction were determined before and during an intravenous infusion of enoximone. The cardiac index increased (2.49 +/- 0.89 to 2.96 +/- 0.78), and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased (22.4 +/- 13.2 to 10.0 +/- 9.0) after enoximone per predefined protocol endpoints. There was a significant decrease in spontaneous sinus cycle length, corrected sinus nodal recovery time, AH interval during atrial pacing, shortest cycle length at which 1:1 atrioventricular nodal conduction occurred, and refractory periods of the atrium, ventricle, and atrioventricular node. Enoximone did not alter the cycle length of induced VT, and there was no consistent change in the number of extrastimuli required for VT induction. A baseline 24-hour ECG recording was obtained on 14 patients (while receiving a long-term antiarrhythmic drug regimen, if needed) and repeated after 1 week and 1 month of oral enoximone therapy. There was no significant increase in the number of premature ventricular complexes per hour or VT episodes per 24 hours after 1 week or 1 month of therapy with enoximone. However, if four patients who received amiodarone and may not yet have reached steady state were excluded from analysis, there was a significant increase in the frequency of premature ventricular complexes per hour 1 month after initiation of enoximone. We conclude that intravenous enoximone reduces pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and increases cardiac output in most patients. Intravenous enoximone in doses sufficient to have hemodynamic effects shortens atrial, ventricular, and atrioventricular nodal refractoriness and decreases AV nodal conduction time but has no consistent effect on VT induction or VT cycle length. The frequency of spontaneous ventricular ectopy may increase in some patients after oral enoximone, but its clinical significance is undefined. Enoximone may be administered cautiously to patients with congestive heart failure and preexisting ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Impact of synchronized left ventricular pacing rate on risk for ventricular tachyarrhythmias after cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure

Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology - The adaptive cardiac resynchronization therapy (aCRT) algorithm automatically produces synchronized left ventricular pacing (sLVP) with...     

Role of drug therapy for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy, broadly defined, is the mainstay of treatment and prevention of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF), which can lead to sudden death. This article evaluates the evidence for and appropriate use of class I antiarrhythmic drugs, class III antiarrhythmic drugs, beta-blockers, nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers, statins, angiotensin enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, aldosterone blockers, and digoxin for antiarrhythmic benefits in patients who have a propensity for VT/VF and therefore are at risk of sudden death.     

Clustering of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in heart failure patients implanted with a biventricular cardioverter defibrillator

Background: Temporal patterns of ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VT/VF) have been studied only in patients who have received implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) for secondary prevention of sudden death, and mainly in ischemic patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate VT/VF recurrence patterns in heart failure (HF) patients with biventricular ICD and to stratify results according to HF etiology and ICD indication.
Methods and Results: We studied 421 patients (91% male, 66 ± 9 years). HF etiology was ischemic in 292 patients and nonischemic in 129. ICD indication was for primary prevention in 227 patients and secondary prevention in 194. Baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 26 ± 7%, QRS duration 168 ± 32 msec, and NYHA class 2.9 ± 0.6. In a follow-up of 19 ± 11 months, 1,838 VT/VF in 110 patients were appropriately detected. In 59 patients who had ≥4 episodes, we tried to determine whether VT/VF occurred randomly or rather tended to cluster by fitting the frequency distribution of tachycardia interdetection intervals with exponential functions: VT/VF clusters were observed in 46 patients (78% of the subgroup of patients with ≥4 episodes and 11% of the overall population). On multivariate logistic analysis, VT/VF clusters were significantly (P < 0.01) associated with ICD indication for secondary prevention (odds ratio [OR]= 3.12; confidence interval [CI]= 1.56–6.92), nonischemic HF etiology (OR = 4.34; CI = 2.02–9.32), monomorphic VT (OR = 4.96; CI = 2.28–10.8), and LVEF < 25% (OR = 3.34; CI = 1.54–7.23). Cardiovascular hospitalizations and deaths occurred more frequently in cluster (21/46 [46%]) than in noncluster patients (63/375 (17%), P < 0.0001).
Conclusions: In HF patients with biventricular ICDs, VT/VF clusters may be regarded as the epiphenomenon of HF deterioration or as a marker of suboptimal response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.     

心力衰竭与室性心律失常

各种心血管疾病发展到一定阶段,常常出现慢性心力衰竭(CHF)和心律失常,这两种情况常同时出现又互相恶化.在心力衰竭合并心律失常中,室性心律失常多见且危害性大,室性心律失常可以是无症状的、良性的,也可以是有症状的、恶性的和致命性的.     

Sensitivity of an automatic external defibrillator for ventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients undergoing electrophysiologic studies

An automatic advisory external defibrillator (AED) was activated during all arrhythmias occurring at the time of 77 electrophysiologic studies in 45 patients. Sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) occurred during 55 studies in 31 patients and nonsustained VT was induced during 10 studies in 9 patients. Ventricular fibrillation was induced 5 times in 5 patients and atrial arrhythmias with a rapid ventricular response occurred during 7 studies in 4 patients. The AED detection algorithm advised "shock" during 36 of 55 (65%) episodes of sustained VT and all 5 episodes of ventricular fibrillation. The device correctly advised "shock" for all 6 episodes of nonsustained VT that spontaneously terminated after analysis was complete. Thus, the sensitivity of the device for all ventricular arrhythmias analyzed was 47 of 66 (71%). The device recommended "shock" for all 31 episodes of rapid VT and 1 of 2 episodes of atrial fibrillation associated with systemic hypotension (32 of 33, 97%). The 19 episodes of VT for which "no shock" was advised were comparatively slow and were hemodynamically well tolerated. The device recommended "no shock" during all 21 episodes of normal sinus rhythm and all 20 episodes of rapid atrial pacing (cycle length 400 ms) analyzed. "No shock" was advised during 4 episodes of sustained narrow QRS complex supraventricular tachycardia and 4 brief episodes of nonsustained VT that terminated before analysis was complete. Thus, in this study the specificity of the AED for wide complex tachycardias was 100%.     

Development of congestive heart failure and alterations in left ventricular function in patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with amiodarone

The interaction between the efficacy and tolerance of amiodarone and the degree of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction was assessed in 126 patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias. In all patients radionuclide angiographic LV ejection fraction (EF) was measured before and after 8 to 12 months of amiodarone therapy. At baseline mean EF was 25 +/- 13% and 86 patients had an EF of 30% or less. In patients receiving amiodarone at steady state, there was a small but significant increase in EF (23 to 26%, p less than 0.05). Congestive heart failure (CHF) was present in 43 patients before amiodarone therapy. In 16 patients new (9 patients) or worsened (7 patients) CHF developed during the first year of amiodarone therapy. Development of CHF was not consistently related to a change in EF or heart rate. The clinical efficacy and tolerance of amiodarone were affected by the baseline EF and development of CHF. Efficacy and tolerance was 80% in patients with an EF of more than 30% and 60% in those with an EF of 30% or less. Among the 16 patients in whom new or worsened CHF developed, 6 (38%) died and 9 (56%) had recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Both baseline EF and development of CHF during amiodarone treatment significantly affect the prognosis in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Prospective comparison of Holter monitoring and electrophysiologic study in patients with coronary artery disease and sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias

Baseline 24-hour Holter monitoring (HM) and electrophysiologic study (EPS) were compared in 43 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease who had sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias to determine the fraction of patients in whom each could be performed and the fraction in whom each could be used to guide therapy. Patients were excluded from HM if sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) requiring termination occurred and from EPS if heart failure was sufficiently severe to cause excessive risk. More patients completed EPS than HM (90% vs 71%), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.12). Overall, HM detected arrhythmias suitable for antiarrhythmic drug assessment in 50% of patients: 30 or more ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) per hour in 50%, 10 or more VPC pairs in 44%, 5 or more runs in 19%, and 10 or more pairs and runs in 44%. Sustained monomorphic VT suitable for electropharmacologic testing was induced at EPS in 82% (p = 0.003 vs HM). Drug efficacy could be assessed in 70% of patients evaluated by HM, compared with 96% evaluated by EPS (p = 0.02). Thus, in consecutive coronary patients with sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmias, EPS could be used to guide therapy more frequently than HM.     

Beta-blocker therapy in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the setting of left ventricular dysfunction

Although several studies suggest beta blockers (BB) are effective in suppressing ventricular arrhythmias, less is known about their role in the treatment of patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias associated with impaired left ventricular function. To assess the tolerance and efficacy of these agents, 32 patients presenting with either ventricular fibrillation (18) or sustained ventricular tachycardia (14) were studied during BB therapy. Left ventricular dysfunction (mean ejection fraction 29%) was present as a consequence of coronary artery disease (26) or cardiomyopathy (6). Baseline arrhythmia assessment revealed recurrent ventricular tachycardia in all patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy including BB was guided by programmed stimulation (10), exercise testing (8), ambulatory monitoring (12), or was given empirically (2). Beta blockers were well tolerated, as measured by exercise duration, which improved significantly, and by long-term maintenance, which continued in 23 of 32 (72%) patients. Over a mean follow-up of 668 days, patients treated with BB had a relatively low incidence of both sudden (3%) and nonsudden (9%) death. Thus, BB can be effective and well tolerated adjunct therapy in patients with a history of ventricular tachyarrhythmias in the setting of impaired left ventricular function.