Use of air in double contrast barium enema--is it still acceptable?

There is conflicting evidence regarding the benefit of using carbon dioxide in a double contrast barium enema. In a double blind prospective study, 200 patients undergoing out-patient double contrast barium enemas (DCBE) were randomly allocated to receive either air or carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation. After 24 h they were requested to complete and return a questionnaire regarding abdominal pain and distension experienced following the examination. The use of CO2 reduced the incidence of severe post-DCBE pain from 27% to 7%. There was a higher incidence of severe pain in younger patients, regardless of which gas was used. The incidence of severe pain following DCBE was unrelated to the presence or absence of abdominal pain as part of the patient's symptomatology. In the light of these findings we advocate the routine use of CO2 in DCBE.     

Comparative roentgen study of the small intestine with single and double contrast

The experiences from a total of 303 small intestine examinations of different techniques show that especially the double-contrast representation using barium sulfate and air achieves the best diagnostical findings. The double-contrast representation can be achieved by an antegrade small intestine enema (enteroclysis) or within the conventional small intestine passage by retrograde air insufflation. These examination techniques make optimal fine diagnostics especially of the lower ileum possible. The indications for the different methods are explained.     

Postendoscopy barium enema examinations

A study was designed to evaluate whether sigmoidoscopy performed on the same day as barium enema examination interferes with quality or interpretation of the barium study. The study included 295 patients who had either single- or double-contrast barium enema examinations subsequent to sigmoidoscopy performed either on a prior day or the same day. Luminal air, spasm, colonic fluid, and mucosal coating were assessed, as was the resultant diagnostic quality of each barium examination. The results suggest that rigid or fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy can be performed the same day as single- or double-contrast barium enema examinations without adversely affecting the quality or interpretation of the barium study.     

What happens to patients after upper and lower gastrointestinal tract barium studies?

We investigated the occurrence of new constipation, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, visible blood in stool, abdominal pain, black stools, belching, and flatus in 324 outpatients following upper or lower gastrointestinal tract barium procedures. We also evaluated the roles of age, sex, patient mobility, and types of barium enema (single- or double-contrast). At least one new symptom was reported after 51% of all examinations. Constipation was the most frequently reported single symptom after barium meal or small bowel examinations. Fifty percent of all constipation occurred following upper gastrointestinal examinations. Abdominal pain was common in patients of the seventh decade, especially following barium enema. Nausea typically followed barium swallow or upper gastrointestinal series. Belching and passage of flatus were the most frequently reported symptoms after barium enema, both single- and double-contrast. No significant relationship between the frequency of symptoms and patient age, sex, or the type of barium enema was established.     

早期结肠癌低张气钡双对比造影检查与纤维结肠镜对比分析

目的:对于早期结肠癌的检查,通过低张气钡双对比造影(DCBE)图像与纤维结肠镜检查图像对比观察,分析气钡双对比结肠造影在检出早期结肠癌中的价值。方法:20例经病理证实早期结肠癌病例,采用低张气钡双对比造影方法,实时点片。常规纤维结肠镜检查。结果:Ⅰ型11例,Ⅱa型6例,混合型1例,LST型2例,对比观察造影像及内镜像表现。结论:正确运用气钡双对比造影检查,对早期结肠癌的显示有较大价值。     

Pain in knee arthrography: comparison of air vs. CO2 and reaspiration vs. no reaspiration

A prospective study of 255 patients undergoing double-contrast arthrography of the knee was performed to evaluate postexamination knee pain after two procedural modifications: (1) intraarticular carbon dioxide versus room air and (2) postprocedural joint reaspiration versus no reaspiration. A moderate or severe increase in pain during the 24 hr after the examination was experienced by 20% of patients. Carbon dioxide resulted in slightly greater patient pain immediately after the procedure than did room air. However, there was no difference in morbidity in these two groups at 24 hr. Aspiration of the knee joint had no immediate or delayed effect on patient pain. Older patients, women, and patients with abnormal arthrograms, reported more baseline discomfort but, allowing for this, they tolerated the procedure as well as younger patients, men, and patients with normal arthrograms. It is recommended that double contrast arthrography of the knee be performed using intraarticular air without reaspiration of the joint.     

Feasibility of instructing radiology technologists in the performance of gastrointestinal fluoroscopy

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine if dedicated gastrointestinal technologists could be trained to properly perform esophagography and double-contrast barium enema examinations. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients undergoing double-contrast barium enema examinations and 123 patients undergoing esophagographic examinations were included in the study. The study was conducted over a 4-month period, with examinations performed by eight gastrointestinal technologists, 10 radiology residents, and four staff radiologists. Four random lists were generated for each set of examinations. Each staff gastrointestinal radiologist, who was unaware of who had performed the examination, independently scored the representative radiographs. RESULTS: For the double-contrast barium enema examinations, no statistically significant differences were found between the technologists and residents for amount of barium used, degree of distention, cecal opacification, and quality of spot radiographs. The technologist-performed examinations had a statistically significant lower mean fluoroscopy time (3.2 min, compared with 4.0 min for staff radiologists and 5.7 min for residents). For the esophagrams, no statistically significant differences between technologists and residents were found for single-contrast esophagrams; radiographs of the gastric cardia; assessment of motility, reflux, and transit of a solid bolus; and fluoroscopy time. Double-contrast esophagrams obtained by technologists received a better mean score than did those of the residents. CONCLUSION: Radiology technologists can be trained to perform high-quality esophagography and double-contrast barium enema examinations without an unacceptably high radiation dose.     

Performance of barium examinations after acute myocardial infarction: report of a survey

A survey of members of the Society of Gastrointestinal Radiologists was conducted to ascertain the standards of practice and timing for elective barium studies of the gastrointestinal tract in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction. Sixty-two percent of respondents do not have cardiac monitoring apparatus readily available in the fluoroscopy suite. When readily available, such equipment is rarely (42%) or never (58%) used during routine barium examinations. Twenty-four percent of respondents take special precautions when performing examinations on these patients by reducing patient movement, the length of the examination, and the number of radiographs exposed, and by employing cardiac monitoring. Seventy-two (89%) of 81 respondents noted at least one adverse cardiovascular reaction. This was most often chest pain, but there were 10 deaths from cardiac causes. Two-thirds of respondents delay elective barium examinations of any kind for at least 4 weeks after acute myocardial infarction. The remaining one-third perform these studies earlier than 4 weeks. The latter typically limit their studies to the upper gastrointestinal tract (82%), 42% of which are single-contrast; the rest are equally divided between double-contrast and biphasic studies. This minority of radiologists is twice as likely to perform a single-contrast barium enema than a double-contrast barium enema during this period. No such preference for single-contrast (47%) over double-contrast (53%) barium enema is revealed by the majority who delay their elective barium enemas 4 or more weeks. The data indicate a strong preference to defer elective barium examinations a minimum of 4 weeks after acute myocardial infarction. A sizable minority (one-third) of radiologists, however, feel comfortable performing a single-contrast upper gastrointestinal examination at an earlier time.     

Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare patient acceptance of multidetector CT colonography, total colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema to ascertain any overall preference. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent CT colonography followed by either flexible sigmoidoscopy (n = 59) or colonoscopy (n = 109). A 25-point questionnaire with principal components relating to satisfaction, worry, and physical discomfort was administered after CT colonography and after endoscopy, and a follow-up questionnaire was administered 1 week after the procedures. Questionnaires were also completed by 140 patients undergoing double-contrast barium enema examinations. Responses were compared using Wilcoxon's matched pairs test and the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Overall satisfaction was greater with colonoscopy (p = 0.01), but CT colonography caused less discomfort (p = 0.002), was better tolerated (p = 0.005), and was the preferred follow-up investigation of those expressing a preference (p = 0.003). Compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography caused less pain (p = 0.004), was more acceptable (p = 0.04), and was preferred as the follow-up investigation (p < 0.001). Tolerance of colonoscopy was significantly less in women (p = 0.03), but such was not the case for CT colonography (p = 0.58). Patients undergoing CT colonography were less worried (p < 0.001), were more satisfied (p = 0.001), and suffered less discomfort (p < 0.001) than those having barium enema. CONCLUSION: Patients' experiences with barium enema examinations were significantly worse than with any other test. Although patients were most satisfied with colonoscopy, they reported more pain during both colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy than during CT colonography, and they also found CT more acceptable. In patients expressing a preference, CT colonography was the preferred follow-up investigation.     

Ileocecal valve: spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination

PURPOSE: To characterize the spectrum of normal findings of the ileocecal valve at double-contrast barium enema examination to allow differentiation between a normal valve and one infiltrated by tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of radiology and endoscopy files showed 106 patients who underwent double-contrast barium enema examination and colonoscopy. The radiographic images were reviewed by two authors to determine the morphology of the ileocecal valve and to evaluate whether it appeared normal or abnormal. The radiographic data were then correlated with endoscopic and pathologic findings. RESULTS: The ileocecal valve was visible in 91 (86%) of 106 patients. It was round or ovoid in 71 patients (78%) and triangular in 20 (22%). In the 88 patients with a normal valve at colonoscopy, mean valve height was 1.7 cm, and mean width was 2.8 cm. The valve was smooth in 75 patients (85%) and smoothly lobulated in 13 (15%). The lips of the valve were symmetric in 77 patients (88%) and asymmetric in 11 (12%). All 87 patients with a normal valve at double-contrast barium enema examination had a normal valve at colonoscopy, whereas the two patients with a valve suspicious for tumor at barium enema examination had neoplasms (one carcinoma and one villous adenoma) at colonoscopy. CONCLUSION: The ileocecal valve may show a spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination and may appear as a round, ovoid, or triangular structure with a maximal height of nearly 4 cm. The valve may be large, asymmetric, or smoothly lobulated, even in the absence of tumor.     

Carbon dioxide or air in double-contrast enemas: a study of the pain and discomfort during and after examination

This prospective randomized double-blind study was done to assess the difference between carbon dioxide (CO₂) and air regarding pain and discomfort during and after double-contrast enemas, and to find a possible explanation of why prior investigations have come to different conclusions regarding the usefulness of CO₂. Using a questionnaire opinions regarding pain and discomfort during and 30 mins, 2 h and 8 h after a double-contrast enema with either CO₂ or air were collected from 142 and 120 patients, respectively. The study has shown less pain and discomfort 30 min and 2 h after the enema when CO₂ was used, whereas there is no significant difference during the examinations and after 8 h. Together with the fact that there are patients reporting worsening pain after the exam, this might explain the differences between earlier investigations. Because CO₂ gives less pain than air it is recommended as a negative contrast medium in double-contrast enemas, although the distension of the bowel is not as good as with air.This study was supported by a grant from the Swedish Society of Medical Radiology.     

Effect of glucagon on the diagnostic accuracy of double-contrast barium enema examinations

The effect of glucagon-induced hypotonicity on the diagnostic accuracy of double-contrast barium enema examinations was determined in 133 consecutive patients in a double-blind crossover study. All patients underwent colonoscopy and served as their own controls by undergoing a double-contrast study after intravenous injection of 1 mg of glucagon and another after intravenous injection of 1 ml of saline placebo, in randomized order. The frequencies of good/excellent hypotonicity and quality of examinations after first doses of glucagon (55.3% and 80.8%) were not significantly different from the frequencies of good/excellent results after first doses of saline (51.3% and 86.5%). The sensitivity was 72.6% after glucagon and 64.5% after placebo; the specificity was 88.7% after glucagon and 77.9% after placebo; and the respective accuracies were 81.2% and 71.9%. These percentages should be used only to compare results with and without glucagon and, by study design, do not represent results of a complete double-contrast study. The variation among these percentages was not statistically significant, but diverticulitis was more accurately diagnosed after glucagon. It was concluded that glucagon does not significantly improve the sensitivity and specificity of the double-contrast barium enema examination and should be used only in selected instances.     

胃肠系统淋巴瘤的X线与CT诊断(附20例分析)

目的分析胃肠系统淋巴瘤的CT、胃肠造影表现。材料与方法回顾性分析了20例胃肠系统淋巴瘤的胃肠道造影及CT影像资料，其中男16例，女4例，年龄25～71岁。20例均行胃肠道造影检查，15例行腹部CT检查。所有病例均经病理证实。结果1．胃肠道气钡造影检查①浸润型胃8例，小肠1例；②肿块型胃5例；③溃疡型胃2例；④息肉型近端空肠1例，末端回肠及盲肠3例。2．CT表现向心性壁厚20～25mm局限性肿块，脾大，脾内低密度灶2例；淋巴结增大。结论1．气钡双重造影是诊断胃肠系统淋巴瘤的首选方法，CT检查可以补充其他器官及淋巴结情况。2．胃肠系统淋巴瘤应与其他疾病相鉴别。     

Single-contrast vs double-contrast barium enema in the detection of colonic polyps

Radiographic and colonoscopic correlation in 139 patients with 234 colonic polyps compared the sensitivity of single- and double-contrast barium enema. Single-contrast barium enema detected 68 (80%) of polyps, with 72% of polyps under 1 cm and 94% of those 1 cm or over detected. Double-contrast barium enema detected 135 (91%) of 149 polyps, with 88% of polyps under 1 cm and 96% of larger polyps detected. Thus, the double-contrast barium enema was more effective than the single-contrast examination only for detection of polyps under 1 cm. The single-contrast barium enema was more likely performed on patients in poor physical condition and in those over 70 years old. The results suggest that for elderly patients, who may have difficulty in cooperating for a double-contrast enema, a properly performed single-contrast examination is an acceptable option.     

Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter

PURPOSE: To evaluate radiologic findings of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) of the colon at double-contrast barium enema examination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Double-contrast barium enema findings in six patients with pathologically proved PTCL of the colon were retrospectively evaluated and compared with colonoscopic and histopathologic findings. RESULTS: There was a diffuse involvement of almost all segments of the colon in four patients and a focal segmental involvement in two. Frequent findings at double-contrast barium enema examination included geographic ulcerations (n = 6), aphthous ulcerations (n = 4), pseudopolyps (n = 4), circumferential luminal narrowing (n = 4), and ileocecal deformity (n = 4). CONCLUSION: PTCL of the colon manifested as either a diffuse or a focal segmental lesion and showed extensive mucosal ulceration at double-contrast barium enema examination. These findings are similar to those of inflammatory bowel disease and are different from those of colorectal lymphoma with the B-cell phenotype.     

Is carbon dioxide as an insufflation agent for double contrast barium enema still worthwhile after a same-day flexible sigmoidoscopy?

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of a double-contrast barium enema (DCBE) with CO(2) as a distending gas after a screening flexible sigmoidoscopy for reducing abdominal distension after an examination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 165 DCBEs for patients with positive faecal occult blood tests were randomly allocated to a CO(2) group (n = 83) and a control group (n = 82) using air. Abdominal radiograph were taken before the DCBE, immediately following it, and 30 minutes later to determine residual bowel gas. The degree of abdominal discomfort was recorded using a scoring system. RESULTS: The patients in the CO(2) group had significantly smaller amounts of residual gas 30 minutes after the DCBE than did the control group, both in the colon (P < 0.02) and in the small intestine (P < 0.001). There was significantly less abdominal distension after the DCBE in the CO(2) group compared to the control group (P < 0.001). The abdominal discomfort score at 30 minutes after CO(2) correlated with the residual gas in the small intestine (r = 0.390,P = 0.003) but not in the colon (r = 0.155, P = 0.15). The quality of the images and the number of polyps detected did not differ between two groups. CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that using CO(2) when administering a DCBE after a screening sigmoidoscopy was useful for relieving abdominal discomfort following the examination; furthermore, it did not impair the diagnostic ability of the DCBE.     

Air-contrast barium enema studies after flexible proctosigmoidoscopy: randomized controlled clinical trial

The authors performed a randomized clinical trial to determine the effect of flexible proctosigmoidoscopy (FPS) on the quality of air-contrast barium enema (ACBE) studies performed on the same day and whether it mattered if air or carbon dioxide was used for endoscopic insufflation. One hundred twenty-one patients were randomly assigned to one of the following groups: Same-day studies were performed, with air used for insufflation, in group 1; same-day studies, with carbon dioxide, in group 2; and separate-day studies in group 3. Scout images obtained before the ACBE study were graded for the amount of air seen, and ACBE studies were graded for overall quality; each was graded on a scale of 0-3 in a blinded fashion. The air score was significantly greater in group 1 (2.69) than in group 2 (2.01) (P less than .001), which in turn was significantly greater than in group 3 (1.53) (P less than .01). The ACBE quality scores in the three groups were not significantly different. The authors conclude that FPS can be done before ACBE examination without impairing the quality of the ACBE study. Although carbon dioxide insufflation results in less intestinal air after FPS, the quality of the ACBE study is not affected.     

The effect of timing of intravenous muscle relaxant on the quality of double-contrast barium enema

AIM: To determine whether the timing of buscopan administration during double-contrast barium enema examination (DCBE) affects diagnostic quality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective setting, 100 consecutive adult out-patients referred for DCBE received 20 mg buscopan (hyoscine-N-butylbromide) intravenously, either before infusion of barium suspension (Group A) or after barium infusion and gas insufflation (Group B). A subjective assessment of ease of contrast medium infusion was made at the time of examination and the films subsequently analysed by two radiologists unaware of the mode of relaxant administration, who noted the quality of mucosal coating and made subjective and objective measurements of segmental distension. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in screening times, infusion difficulty or colonic contrast medium coating between the two groups. Subjective assessment of distension of the caecum, ascending colon, transverse colon and rectum were not significantly different. Patients receiving intravenous relaxant after barium and gas infusion had less subjective descending (P = 0. 05) and sigmoid (P = 0.04) colon distension, but there was no significant difference with respect to maximal bowel diameter in any of the segments measured. CONCLUSION: The timing of intravenous administration during DCBE is likely to have no significant effect on the diagnostic quality of the study.     

Double-contrast magnetic resonance examination of ulcerative colitis

The aim of our work was to propose a double-contrast magnetic resonance examination (DCMRE) in the follow-up of ulcerative colitis (UC), comparing this new technique with X-ray double-contrast barium enema (DCBE). After preparation with colon-cleansing regimen used for DCBE, six UC patients and six control subjects underwent a 1.5-T examination: supine position, coronal and axial fat-spectral-saturation breath-hold gradient-echo T1-weighted sequences after intravenous hypotonization and 1500–2000 cc air insufflation. Without evacuating the primarily insufflated air, the same images were acquired after endorectal administration of negative superparamagnetic contrast agent (600 cc) and intravenous administration of positive paramagnetic contrast agent (0.2 mmol/kg). All patients had undergone DCBE in the four preceding weeks. We found significant increase in wall thickness of UC affected vs apparently unaffected segments (p = 0.0425) and vs CG (p = 0.0447), significant increase in enhancement percent of UC affected vs apparently unaffected segments (p = 0.0161) and vs CG (p = 0.0185), and no significant difference for enhancement percent of UC unaffected segments vs CG. DCMRE and DCBE localized the UC extension at the same sites in all patients. Double-contrast MR examination time was 20–30 min. This new method could be used in follow-up of UC patients. Received: 23 April 1998; Revision received: 17 June 1998; Accepted: 22 July 1998