Peginterferon add‐on results in more HBsAg decline compared to monotherapy in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients

It is unknown whether peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) add‐on to entecavir (ETV) leads to more HBsAg decline compared to PEG‐IFN monotherapy or combination therapy, and whether ETV therapy may prevent HBsAg increase after PEG‐IFN cessation. We performed a post hoc analysis of 396 HBeAg‐positive patients treated for 72 weeks with ETV + 24 weeks PEG‐IFN add‐on from week 24 to 48 (add‐on, n = 85), 72 weeks with ETV monotherapy (n = 90), 52 weeks with PEG‐IFN monotherapy (n = 111) and 52 weeks PEG‐IFN + lamivudine (combination, n = 110) within 2 randomized trials. HBsAg decline was assessed at the end of PEG‐IFN (EOP) and 6 months after PEG‐IFN (EOF) discontinuation. Differences in baseline characteristics were accounted for using inversed probability of treatment weights. At EOP, a HBsAg reduction of ≥1log₁₀ IU/mL was more frequently achieved for patients in the add‐on or combination therapy arms (both 36%), compared to PEG‐IFN mono (20%) or ETV (8%) (add‐on vs PEG‐IFN mono P = 0.050). At EOF, the HBsAg reduction ≥1log₁₀ IU/mL was only sustained in patients treated with ETV consolidation (add‐on vs combination and PEG‐IFN mono: 40% vs 23% and 18%, P = 0.029 and P = 0.003, respectively). For add‐on, combination, PEG‐IFN mono and ETV, the mean HBsAg‐level change at EOF was ?0.84, ?0.81, ?0.68 and ?0.33 log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively (P > 0.05 for PEG‐IFN arms). HBeAg loss at EOF was 36%, 31%, 33% and 20%, respectively (P > 0.05). PEG‐IFN add‐on for 24 weeks results in more on‐treatment HBsAg decline than does 52 weeks of PEG‐IFN monotherapy. ETV therapy may maintain the HBsAg reduction achieved with PEG‐IFN.     

IFNL3 (IL28B) polymorphism does not predict long‐term response to interferon therapy in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients

The impact of IFNL3 (IL28B) polymorphism on response to interferon (IFN) treatment in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is controversial. We aimed to investigate whether IFNL3 polymorphism (rs12979860) influences the long‐term response of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment to conventional IFN. Design: Ninety‐seven HBeAg‐positive patients treated with IFN were evaluated in this study. Associations were investigated between IFNL3 genotypes and (i) HBeAg seroconversion at the end of treatment (EOT), (ii) sustained virological response (SVR) and (iii) HBsAg seroconversion through long‐term follow‐up (LTFU). Patients were followed for a median of 14 years. The majority of patients were infected with HBV genotype A (69.6%) and were Caucasian (77.9%). Ninety‐five patients were genotyped at rs12979860. Similar IFNL3 distribution was observed among the different ethnicities (P = 0.62) or across HBV genotypes A through G (P = 0.70). Thirty‐six patients experienced HBeAg seroconversion at EOT; HBeAg seroconversion rates were 37.0 and 35.5% in patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes, respectively (P = 0.82). Among the 44 patients (45%) who achieved a SVR, SVR rates were 48.9 and 39.6% in patients with CC and CT/TT IL28B genotypes, respectively (P = 0.80). HBsAg seroconversion occurred through LTFU in 28 patients. HBsAg seroconversion rates were 25.5 and 31.2% in patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes, respectively (P = 0.51). No significant relationship between IFNL3 rs12979860 and fibrosis stage was observed (P = 0.85). IFNL3 genotype was neither associated with SVR, nor with HBeAg seroconversion and long‐term HBsAg seroconversion in HBeAg‐positive CHB patients responding to IFN therapy.     

HBsAg loss after peginterferon‐nucleotide combination treatment in chronic hepatitis B patients: 5 years of follow‐up

Combining peginterferon‐alfa‐2a (pegIFN) with a nucleotide analogue can result in higher rates of HBsAg loss than either therapy given alone. Here, we investigated the durability of the response to combination therapy in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients after 5 years of follow‐up. In the initial study, 92 CHB patients (44 HBeAg‐positive, 48 HBeAg‐negative) with HBV DNA >100 000 c/mL (~20 000 IU/mL) and active hepatitis were treated for 48 weeks with pegIFN 180 μg/week and 10 mg adefovir dipivoxil daily. For the long‐term follow‐up (LTFU) study, patients were followed up for 5 years after the end of treatment. At year 5, 70 (32 HBeAg‐positive, 38 HBeAg‐negative) patients remained in the study. At year 5, 19% (6/32) of HBeAg‐positive patients and 16% (6/38) of HBeAg‐negative patients lost HBsAg, and no HBsAg seroreversion was observed. The 5‐year cumulative Kaplan‐Meier estimate for HBsAg loss was 17.2% for HBeAg‐positive patients and 19.3% for HBeAg‐negative patients. Fourteen of sixteen patients who lost HBsAg at any time point during follow‐up developed anti‐HBs antibodies (>10 IU/L). At year 5, in total 63% (20/32) of HBeAg‐positive and 71% (27/38) of HBeAg‐negative patients were retreated with nucleos(t)ide analogues during follow‐up. The cumulative Kaplan‐Meier estimate for retreatment was 60% of patients at year 5. At year 5 of follow‐up, 18% of CHB patients treated with pegIFN/nucleotide analogue combination therapy had durable HBsAg loss and 88% of these had developed anti‐HBs antibodies.     

Long‐term follow‐up of clinical trial patients treated for chronic HCV infection with daclatasvir‐based regimens

Background & Aims

Daclatasvir has achieved high sustained virologic response (SVR) rates in diverse hepatitis C virus (HCV) populations. This study evaluated the long‐term efficacy and safety of daclatasvir‐based regimens administered during clinical studies.

Methods

Patients enrolled within 6 months of parent study completion or protocol availability at the study sites. The primary objective was durability of SVR at follow‐up Week 12 (SVR12). Secondary objectives included analysing HCV sequences in non‐responders or responders who relapsed, and characterization of liver disease progression.

Results

Between 24 February 2012 and 17 July 2015, this study enrolled and began following 1503 recipients of daclatasvir‐based regimens (follow‐up cut‐off, 13 October 2015); 60% were male, 18% aged ≥65 years, 87% had genotype‐1a (42%) or ‐1b (45%) infection, and 18% had cirrhosis. Median follow‐up from parent study follow‐up Week 12 was 111 (range, 11‐246) weeks. 1329/1489 evaluable patients were SVR12 responders; 1316/1329 maintained SVR until their latest visit. Twelve responders relapsed by (n = 9) or after (n = 3) parent study follow‐up Week 24; one was reinfected. Relapse occurred in 3/842 (0.4%) and 9/487 (2%) responders treated with interferon‐free or interferon‐containing regimens, respectively. Hepatic disease progression and new hepatocellular carcinoma were diagnosed in 15 and 23 patients, respectively. Among non‐responders, emergent non‐structural protein‐5A (NS5A) and ‐3 (NS3) substitutions were replaced by wild‐type sequences in 27/157 (17%) and 35/47 (74%) patients, respectively.

Conclusions

SVR12 was durable in 99% of recipients of daclatasvir‐based regimens. Hepatic disease progression and new hepatocellular carcinoma were infrequent. Emergent NS5A substitutions persisted longer than NS3 substitutions among non‐responders.     

Serum hepatitis B virus RNA predicts response to peginterferon treatment in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA in serum is a novel biomarker that reflects cccDNA activity. We investigated whether HBV RNA can predict serological response to peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) treatment. Serum HBV RNA levels were retrospectively measured at weeks 0, 12, 24 and 52 of therapy and after treatment discontinuation (week 78) in 266 HBeAg‐positive chronic HBV patients who had participated in a global randomized controlled trial (HBV99‐01 study). Patients received 52 weeks PEG‐IFN monotherapy (n = 136) or PEG‐IFN and lamivudine (n = 130). The primary end point was HBeAg loss 24 weeks after PEG‐IFN discontinuation. At baseline, the mean serum level of HBV RNA was 6.8 (SD 1.2) log c/mL. HBV RNA levels declined to 4.7 (1.7) log c/mL after one year of PEG‐IFN therapy alone and to 3.3 (1.2)log c/mL after combination therapy. From week 12 onward, HBV RNA level was significantly lower in patients who achieved HBeAg loss at the end of follow‐up as compared to those who did not, regardless of treatment allocation (week 12:4.4 vs 5.1 log c/mL, P = .01; week 24:3.7 vs 4.9 log c/mL, P < .001). The performance of a multivariable model based on HBV RNA level was comparable at week 12 (AUC 0.68) and 24 (AUC 0.72) of therapy. HBV RNA level above 5.5 log c/mL at week 12 showed negative predictive values of 93/67/90/64% for HBV genotypes A/B/C/D for the prediction of HBeAg loss. In conclusion, HBV RNA in serum declines profoundly during PEG‐IFN treatment. Early on‐treatment HBV RNA level may be used to predict nonresponse.     

Pegylated interferon alfa for chronic hepatitis B: systematic review and meta‐analysis

Conventional interferon alfa and nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as lamivudine, are frequently used for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment, but are associated with adverse effects and viral resistance. Here we performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluating all studies of pegylated interferon alfa (PEG‐IFNα) treatment in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients with CHB. We searched electronic databases – PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and LILACS – for randomized controlled trials evaluating PEG‐IFNα therapy between 1999 and September 2014. Virological response was the primary outcome. We identified 14 studies involving 2829 patients. Our analysis revealed that PEG‐IFNα + lamivudine combination therapy produced better virological and biochemical responses than PEG‐IFNα monotherapy in HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients at the end of treatment. PEG‐IFNα + adefovir dipivoxil achieved better seroconversion rate than PEG‐IFNα in HBeAg‐positive patients at the end of treatment. The present findings demonstrated a beneficial response rate following PEG‐IFNα combination therapy with nucelos(t)ides among HBeAg‐positive and HBeAg‐negative patients with CHB. Further trials are needed to investigate simultaneous and sequential therapy strategies.     

Hepatitis B core‐related antigen monitoring during peginterferon alfa treatment for HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B

Serum Hepatitis B core‐related antigen (HBcrAg) level moderately correlates with cccDNA. We examined whether HBcrAg can add value in monitoring the effect of peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) therapy for HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Thus, serum HBcrAg level was measured in 133 HBeAg‐negative, mainly Caucasian CHB patients, treated with 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN alfa‐2a. We assessed its association with response (ALT normalization & HBV DNA < 2000 IU/mL) at week 72. HBcrAg level strongly correlated with HBV DNA level (r = 0.8, P < 0.001) and weakly with qHBsAg and ALT (both r = 0.2, P = 0.01). At week 48, mean HBcrAg decline was ?3.3 log U/mL. Baseline levels were comparable for patients with and without response at week 72 (5.0 vs 4.9 log U/mL, P = 0.59). HBcrAg decline at week 72 differed between patients with and without response (?2.4 vs ?1.0 log U/mL, P = 0.001), but no cut‐off could be determined. The pattern of decline in responders resembled that of HBV DNA, but HBcrAg decline was weaker (HBcrAg ?2.5 log U/mL; HBV DNA: ?4.0 log IU/mL, P < 0.001). For early identification of nonresponse, diagnostic accuracy of HBV DNA and qHBsAg decline at week 12 (AUC 0.742, CI‐95% [0.0.629‐0.855], P < 0.001) did not improve by adding HBcrAg decline (AUC 0.747, CI‐95% [0.629‐0.855] P < 0.001), nor by replacing HBV DNA decline by HBcrAg decline (AUC 0.754, CI‐95% [0.641‐0.867], P < 0.001). In conclusion, in Caucasian patients with HBeAg‐negative CHB, decline of HBcrAg during PEG‐IFN treatment was stronger in patients with treatment response. However, HBcrAg was not superior to HBV DNA and qHBsAg in predicting response during PEG‐IFN treatment.     

Rescue therapy for lamivudine‐resistant chronic hepatitis B: Comparison between entecavir 1.0 mg monotherapy,adefovir monotherapy and adefovir add‐on lamivudine combination therapy

Background and Aim: There have been no reports comparing the therapeutic results of adefovir (ADV) and entecavir (ETV) rescue therapy for patients with lamivudine (LAM)‐resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to compare the cumulative efficacy and resistance of ETV 1.0 mg monotherapy, ADV monotherapy and ADV add‐on LAM combination therapy in LAM‐refractory patients. Methods: One hundred and four patients were included in the following three treatment groups; group 1 (n = 24), LAM was switched to ETV (1.0 mg once a day); group 2 (n = 44), LAM was switched to ADV (10 mg once a day); and group 3 (n = 36), ADV was added to LAM (10 mg once a day). Results: After 6 months of rescue treatment, alanine aminotransferase normalization was observed in 75.0%, 65.9% and 74.3% of patients receiving ETV monotherapy, ADV monotherapy and ADV add‐on therapy, respectively. A significantly higher log₁₀HBV‐DNA drop at 6 months occurred in the ADV add‐on group compared with the ETV group. The rate of HBV‐DNA polymerase chain reaction undetectability (<300 copies/mL) 6 months after initiation of ETV monotherapy, ADV monotherapy and ADV add‐on therapy was 33.3%, 27.3% and 68.6%, respectively (P = 0.003). The cumulative HBeAg seroconversion rate was significantly higher in ADV add‐on/ADV monotherapy groups compared with the ETV monotherapy group (P = 0.022). Viral breakthrough and genotypic resistance were detected in six (25.0%) and six (13.6%) patients in the ETV and ADV monotherapy groups, whereas no cases of genotypic resistance were detected in ADV add‐on group 24 months after initiation of antiviral treatment (P < 0.01). Conclusion: Adefovir add‐on treatment in patients with LAM‐resistant CHB suppresses HBV replication more effectively than ETV or ADV monotherapy. Additionally, no genotypic resistance was detected in the ADV add‐on group.     

Hepatitis B surface antigen reduction by switching from long‐term nucleoside/nucleotide analogue administration to pegylated interferon

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) reduction during nucleoside/nucleotide analogue (NA) therapy is slow and an alternative strategy for patients receiving ongoing NA to facilitate HBsAg reduction is required. We investigated whether switching to pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) after long‐term NA administration enhances HBsAg reduction. Forty‐nine patients who switched from long‐term NA to 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN alfa‐2a were studied. The mean duration of previous NA was 48 months (sequential group). A total of 147 patients who continued NA and matched for baseline characteristics were analysed for comparison (NA continuation group). The treatment response was defined as HBsAg reduction ≥1.0 logIU/mL at the end of PEG‐IFN. HBsAg reduction at week 48 was 0.81±1.1 logIU/mL in the sequential group, which was significantly higher than that in the NA continuation group (0.11±0.3 logIU/mL, P < .001). The treatment response was achieved in 29% and 2% of the sequential group and NA continuation group (P < .001), and the odds ratio of sequential therapy for the treatment response was 19 compared with the NA continuation (P < .001). In patients tested positive for hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), HBeAg seroconversion was higher in the sequential group (44% vs 8%, P < .001). In HBeAg‐negative patients, only patients in the sequential group achieved HBsAg loss. No patient needed to resume NA administration because of HBV DNA increase accompanied by alanine aminotransferase flares. In summary, sequential therapy with PEG‐IFN after long‐term NA enhances the reduction of HBsAg and may represent a treatment option to promote HBsAg loss.     

Sustained virologic response after therapy with the HCV protease inhibitor narlaprevir in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin is durable through long‐term follow‐up

Achievement of a sustained virologic response (SVR) after peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) treatment is considered to be a marker for the cure of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Long‐term follow‐up of patients with SVR after treatment with a direct acting antiviral has not yet been described. We used a randomized placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, two‐period phase 1b trial that was conducted in 40 HCV genotype 1 (treatment‐naïve and treatment‐experienced)‐infected patients. Nineteen patients achieved SVR after treatment with the HCV protease inhibitor narlaprevir followed by PEG‐IFN/RBV. In these patients, HCV‐RNA tests were scheduled at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after end of treatment. Patients were followed for a median of 27 months (range 15–32) after end of treatment with a median number of follow‐up visits of 4 (range 3–8). All patients remained HCV‐RNA negative over time. SVR achieved following narlaprevir and PEG‐IFN/RBV‐therapy was durable up to 32 months after the end of treatment.     

Tenofovir‐based alternate therapies for chronic hepatitis B patients with partial virological response to entecavir

Entecavir (ETV) is a first‐line antiviral therapy for treating chronic hepatitis B (CHB); however, some patients have suboptimal response to ETV. Currently, there are limited data on how to approach these patients. Therefore, our aim was to compare the effectiveness of two alternate therapies – tenofovir (TDF) monotherapy and combination therapy of ETV+TDF – in CHB patients with ETV partial virological response. We conducted a retrospective study of 68 patients who had partial virological response to ETV, defined as having detectable HBV DNA following at least 12 months of ETV, and were switched to TDF monotherapy (n = 25) or ETV+TDF (n = 43). Patients were seen in seven US liver/community‐based clinics and started on ETV between 2005 and 2009. The majority of patients were male; the vast majority were Asian and had positive hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Patients in both groups had similar pretreatment characteristics. Complete viral suppression (CVS) rates with TDF monotherapy and ETV+TDF were similar after 6 months (71% vs 83%, P = 0.23) and 12 months (86% vs 84%, P = 0.85), and there was no statistically significant difference in CVS rates even when only patients with higher HBV DNA levels at switch (>1000 IU/mL) were evaluated. Multivariate analysis indicated that ETV+TDF was not an independent predictor of CVS compared to TDF monotherapy (OR = 1.19, P = 0.63). In conclusion, TDF monotherapy and ETV+TDF are comparable in achieving CVS in CHB patients with partial virological response to ETV. Long‐term alternate therapy with one pill (TDF monotherapy) vs two pills (ETV+TDF) could lead to lower nonadherence rates and better treatment outcomes.     

A randomized clinical trial of peginterferon alpha‐2b with or without entecavir in patients with HBeAg‐negative chronic hepatitis B: Role of host and viral factors associated with treatment response

Combining peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) and a potent nucleoside/nucleotide analogue might improve treatment response in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). The aims of this study were to compare the efficacy of PEG‐IFN alpha‐2b with or without entecavir in HBeAg‐negative CHB and to investigate predictors of response. A total of 126 treatment‐naïve patients were randomly assigned to receive monotherapy (n = 63) or combination therapy (n = 63) for 48 weeks. Virological response (VR) was defined as HBV DNA level <2000 IU/mL at week 96. Baseline factors including polymorphisms in the IFNL3 (rs12979860) and HLA‐DPA1 (rs3077) genes and on‐treatment viral kinetics were determined. At week 48, rates of undetectable HBV DNA were lower in the monotherapy than combination groups, but rates of HBsAg clearance and decline were comparable. At week 96, there was no difference between the corresponding groups regarding virological response (41.3% vs 38.1%, P = 0.856), HBsAg clearance (9.5% vs 4.8%, P = 0.491) and HBsAg decline. Baseline HBsAg level [odds ratio (OR): 3.14 (1.34–7.69), P = 0.012] and rs3077 polymorphism [OR: 2.78 (1.27–6.11), P = 0.011] were independent predictors of response. Patients carried GG genotype of rs3077 with low baseline HBV (<1000 IU/mL) had high probability of achieving VR (76.5%) and HBsAg clearance (29.4%). None of the patients without decrease in HBsAg combined with <2 log₁₀ HBV DNA decline at week 12 achieved a virological response. In conclusion, the combination therapy lead to greater on‐treatment HBV DNA suppression but did not improve virological response and HBsAg clearance/decline over monotherapy. Host and viral factors could help optimize decision‐making at baseline and during PEG‐IFN‐based therapy.     

Elevated serum levels of soluble CD14 in HBeAg‐positive chronic HBV patients upon Peginterferon treatment are associated with treatment response

Pegylated IFNα (PEG‐IFN) is one of the treatment options for chronic HBV (CHB) patients. However, the high patient treatment burden and limited response rate together clearly ask for biomarkers to predict PEG‐IFN response. Soluble CD14 (sCD14) is considered a marker for immune activation and has been shown to predict clinical outcome of HIV infection. However, studies on sCD14 in CHB infection are inconclusive, and its relationship with clinical outcome is largely unknown. Here, we measured sCD14 levels in CHB patients and investigated whether changes in sCD14 level related to PEG‐IFN response. Serum sCD14 levels were determined in 15 healthy controls, 15 acute self‐limited HBV, 60 CHB patients in different disease phases and 94 HBeAg+ CHB patients at week 0 and week 12 of a 52‐week PEG‐IFN treatment. Response to PEG‐IFN treatment was defined as HBeAg seroconversion or HBeAg loss at 26 weeks post‐treatment. The mean sCD14 level in acute HBV patients (3.0 µg/mL) was significantly higher than in CHB patients (2.4 µg/mL) and healthy controls (2.4 µg/mL). In CHB patients receiving PEG‐IFN, a significant increase in sCD14 was found after 12‐week treatment (median week 0:2.1 µg/mL; week 12:3.7 µg/mL). After 12‐week treatment, the fold change (FC = w12/w0) in sCD14 was significantly higher in responders compared to nonresponders (HBeAg seroconversion: median FC_responder = 2.1 vs FC_nonresponder = 1.6; HBeAg loss: median FC_responder = 2.2 vs FC_nonresponder = 1.5). Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated that FC‐sCD14_wk12/wk0 levels can be of significant value as a stopping rule to select patients at week 12 who are not likely to benefit from further PEG‐IFN treatment.     

Sequential therapy with entecavir and PEG‐INF in patients affected by chronic hepatitis B and high levels of HBV‐DNA with non‐D genotypes

Complete eradication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is rarely achieved. Treatment options include currently available nucleos(t)ide analogues and pegylated interferon. The aim of our exploratory study was to assess the effectiveness of sequential therapy for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) vs the current standard of care. We evaluated an association with entecavir and pegylated interferon alfa‐2a (PEG‐IFN) in 20 patients with hepatitis B, high HBV viremia and genotypes A, B, C and E. Patients received entecavir alone for 12 weeks, then entecavir and PEG‐IFN for 12 weeks, lastly PEG‐IFN alone for 36 weeks. The results were compared with 20 patients (control group) treated in the past with 48 weeks of PEG‐IFN monotherapy. Our results show that complete sustained virological response (SVR) and partial SVR were, respectively, 60% and 80% in the study group and 10% and 30% in the control group; anti‐HBe seroconversion rate were 76.9% vs 15%, and anti‐HBs seroconversion were 20% vs 0%, respectively. We found a correlation among different genotypes and virological and serological outcomes – genotype C has a better virological response, while genotype A had a better serological response, and E genotype had a poor response. These results show that a sequential approach is a promising strategy of treatment in patients with CHB and high viremia in comparison with PEG‐IFN monotherapy. The E genotype seems to have the worse rate of response and requires other treatment strategies.     

Interferon‐α treatment in children and young adults with chronic hepatitis B: a long‐term follow‐up study in Taiwan

Background/Aims: The short‐ and long‐term benefits of interferon (IFN)‐α therapy in young patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) acquiring infection perinatally or during early childhood have been questioned. Methods: Twenty‐one Taiwanese hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)‐positive CHB patients aged 1.8–21.8 years (median 14.0 years) with alanine aminotransferase (ALT)>80 IU/L at entry were enrolled for IFN‐α therapy. They received IFN‐α therapy with a dose of 3 MU/m²/day three times a week for 24 weeks. A control group included untreated 21 CHB patients closely matched for gender, age, duration of ALT >80 IU/L and HBeAg status. All 42 patients were prospectively followed for 6.5–12.5 years after the end of therapy. Results: The cumulative rate of virological response [anti‐HBe seroconversion and serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐DNA <10⁵ copies/ml] was not different between the IFN‐treated patients and control patients at 1 year (41 vs 44%) and at 6 years (88 vs 89%) after stopping treatment. Serum hepatitis B surface antigen loss occurred in two (9.5%) treated patients and in one (4.8%) control patient. Patients with a successful treatment response (anti‐HBe seroconversion, HBV‐DNA <10² copies/ml and ALT normalization at 1 year after stopping treatment) were younger than those without a successful response (P=0.03). A lower pretreatment serum HBV‐DNA level (<2 × 10⁸ copies/ml) is not only a significant factor to predict successful treatment response (P=0.008) but also has a beneficial effect on the long‐term cumulative rate of virological response in IFN‐treated patients (P=0.021), but not in control patients. Genotype difference or emergence of a precore stop codon mutant before treatment was not predictive for HBeAg clearance. Conclusion: For young CHB patients in Taiwan with infection occurring perinatally or in early childhood, the real advantage of IFN‐α therapy was not observed. IFN‐α therapy showed a beneficial effect on short‐ and long‐term virological outcomes only in those with a lower pretreatment serum HBV‐DNA level.     

Histological responses of peginterferon alpha add‐on therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B with advanced liver fibrosis after long‐term nucleos(t)ide analog treatment

Although long‐term antiviral treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) can lead to histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), a substantial proportion of patients still fail to achieve regression of fibrosis. Here, we investigated whether peginterferon alpha (Peg‐IFNα） add‐on therapy had benefits on fibrosis regression in patients with sustained severe fibrosis even after long‐term NA treatment. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 50 patients with CHB receiving 48 weeks of Peg‐IFNα add‐on therapy. All enrolled patients had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (S score ≥ 3) at baseline and underwent NA treatment for at least 1 year before Peg‐IFNα addition. Paired liver biopsies before and after Peg‐IFNα add‐on treatment and laboratory tests at baseline, 24 weeks of treatment, 48 weeks of treatment and long‐term follow‐up were analysed. Of the 50 patients enrolled in this study, 34 patients (68.0%) had significant regression of fibrosis, and 42 (84.0%) showed significant remission of inflammation after Peg‐IFNα add‐on treatment. Compared with nonresponders, patients with significant histological improvement showed faster hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline and tended to have higher cumulative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBsAg loss rates during long‐term follow‐up. Peg‐IFNα add‐on therapy led to significant regression of fibrosis and resolution of inflammation in patients with advanced fibrosis after long‐term NA treatment.     

Long‐term entecavir or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy in treatment‐naïve chronic hepatitis B patients in the real‐world setting

The aim of this study was to determine the long‐term efficacy of entecavir (ETV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on the natural course of disease in chronic hepatitis B patients (CHB) with/without cirrhosis in clinical practice. A total of 355 treatment‐naïve CHB patients were enrolled into the study. The primary outcome measure was viral suppression as defined by serum HBV DNA level <20 IU/mL. A secondary outcome measure was to determine the development of Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Virological and biochemical responses were similar between the two treatment groups over time. The presence of cirrhosis and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity did not appear to impact viral suppression. The cumulative probability of HBeAg loss was 41% at 4 years of therapy. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss occurred in four patients. Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score was significantly improved from baseline to week 48 and 96 under antiviral therapy (P = 0.013, P = 0.01). HCC was diagnosed in 17 patients (4.8%). The cumulative probability of the development of HCC was 3.3% at 1 year and 7.3% at 4 years of therapy. The development of HCC was independently associated with older age (P = 0.031) and the presence of cirrhosis (P = 0.004). Serum creatinine levels and creatinine clearance remained stable over time. ETV and TDF effectively maintained virological and biochemical responses in long‐term follow‐up of CHB patients with/without cirrhosis. HCC may still develop, although at a lower rate, and is more likely to develop in patients with cirrhosis, especially in older patients.     

Boceprevir and telaprevir‐based triple therapy for chronic hepatitis C: virological efficacy and impact on kidney function and model for end‐stage liver disease score

Triple therapy using telaprevir or boceprevir [hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐NS3/NS4A protease inhibitors (PI)] in association with PEG‐IFN/ribavirin has recently become the new standard of care (SOC) for treatment of HCV genotype 1 patients. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and tolerance of triple therapy in routine clinical practice. A total of 186 consecutive HCV patients initiating triple therapy were enrolled in a single centre study. Clinical, biological and virological data were collected at baseline and during follow‐up as well as tolerance and side effect details. Among 186 HCV patients initiating triple therapy, 69% received telaprevir and 31% boceprevir. Sixty‐one per cent of patients had cirrhosis. The overall extended rapid virological response (eRVR) rate and sustained virological response (SVR) rate were 57.0% and 59.7%, respectively. IL28B CC phenotype was associated with increased probability of achieving eRVR and SVR, whereas previous non‐response was associated with low eRVR and SVR rates. The SVR rate increased from 30.8% in previously non‐responders to 59.1% in partial non‐responders and 75% in relapsers. SVR rate in naive patients was 62.5%. Glomerular filtration rate assessed by MDRD after 12 weeks of therapy was significantly reduced for both PI (P < 0.001). The model for end‐stage liver disease (MELD) score was significantly increased at W12 for telaprevir (P = 0.008) and at W24 for boceprevir (P = 0.027). PI‐based triple therapy leads to high rates of virological response even in previously non‐responder patients. Renal function after triple therapy is impaired as well as MELD score in all patients. Cautious clinical monitoring should focus not only on haematological and dermatological side effects but also on renal function.     

Long‐term clearance of hepatitis C virus following interferon α‐2b or peginterferon α‐2b,alone or in combination with ribavirin

Sustained virologic response (SVR) is the standard measure for evaluating response to therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The aim of this study was to prospectively assess the durability of SVR in the pivotal studies of peginterferon (PEG‐IFN) α‐2b or IFN α‐2b. We conducted two phase 3b long‐term follow‐up studies of patients previously treated for CHC in eight prospective randomized studies of IFN α‐2b and/or PEG‐IFN α‐2b. Patients who achieved SVR [undetectable hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA 24 weeks after completion of treatment] were eligible for inclusion in these follow‐up studies. In total, 636 patients with SVR following treatment with IFN α‐2b and 366 with SVR following treatment with PEG‐IFN α‐2b were enrolled. Definite relapse (quantifiable serum HCV RNA with no subsequent undetectable HCV RNA) was reported in six patients treated with IFN α‐2b and three patients treated with PEG‐IFN α‐2b. Based on these relapses, the point estimate for the likelihood of maintaining response after 5 years was 99.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 98.1–99.7%] for IFN α‐2b and 99.4% (95% CI, 97.7–99.9%) for PEG‐IFN α‐2b. Successful treatment of hepatitis C with PEG‐IFN α‐2b or IFN α‐2b leads to clinical cure of hepatitis C in the vast majority of cases.