Variants of hepatitis B virus surface antigen observed during therapy with nucleic acid polymer REP 2139‐Ca have no influence on treatment outcome and its detection by diagnostic assays

The treatment of patients suffering from HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B with REP 2139‐Ca resulted in potent reductions in HBsAg and HBV DNA, seroconversion to anti‐HBs and the establishment of functional control of infection. In this cohort of 12 patients, we investigated whether differences between HBsAg sequences might explain the lack of response to REP 2139‐Ca observed in 3 of 12 patients. We also assessed if the reduction or complete loss of HBsAg in serum observed during therapy were caused by mutations in the “a” determinant preventing the detection of HBsAg by standard diagnostic assays. The complete pre‐S/S open reading frame (ORF) was sequenced and pre‐S1, pre‐S2 and S amino acid sequences were analysed. We found no major differences between pre‐S1, pre‐S2 and S sequences in responders and nonresponders correlated with low reduction in HBsAg. In addition, we found no mutations in the “a” determinant that would significantly affect the reactivity of HBsAg in diagnostic assays. These results demonstrate that the amino acid sequence of complete pre‐S/S ORF has no direct influence on response to REP 2139‐Ca therapy.     

T‐ and B‐cell responses and previous exposure to hepatitis B virus in ‘anti‐HBc alone’ patients

A serologic response to hepatitis B virus (HBV) defined as ‘anti‐HBc alone’ is commonly observed, but its significance remains unclear. This study aimed to define the relationship between ‘anti‐HBc alone’ serostatus and HBV infection, including HBV‐specific T‐ and B‐cell memory responses. We enrolled 31 ‘anti‐HBc alone’ patients. Total HBV DNA and cccDNA were tested by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis in liver samples from 22 ‘anti‐HBc alone’ patients vs controls (chronic or resolved HBV infection), followed by HBsAg/HBcAg immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. IFN‐γ secretion by HBV‐specific T cells was compared in individuals who were ‘anti‐HBc alone’ (n = 27), resolved HBV (n = 21), chronic HBV (n = 24) and 12 healthy controls using enzyme‐linked immunospot (ELISpot) assays. An HBsAg‐IgG B‐cell ELISpot assay was performed in ‘anti‐HBc alone’ patients before and after one dose of recombinant HBsAg vaccine. The majority (23/31, 74.2%) of the ‘anti‐HBc alone’ individuals were co‐infected with HCV. Infrequent intrahepatic total HBV DNA (2/22, 9.1%) and cccDNA (1/22, 4.5%) were detected in biopsies; HBsAg and HBcAg IHC staining was negative. HBV‐specific T‐cell responses were similar between ‘anti‐HBc alone’ individuals and HBV resolvers. Circulating HBV‐memory B‐cell responses were detected in all ‘anti‐HBc alone’ individuals, consistent with an HBsAg‐specific memory pool. After one HBV vaccine dose, increased anti‐HBs antibody levels were observed, accompanied by an expansion of HBsAg‐specific memory B cells (P = 0.0226). ‘Anti‐HBc alone’ individuals showed HBV‐specific T‐cell and memory B‐cell responses typical of previous viral exposure and protective memory, suggesting a resolved infection.     

Hepatitis B reactivation in HBsAg‐negative/HBcAb‐positive patients receiving rituximab for lymphoma: a meta‐analysis

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (HBsAg‐positive) are at risk of viral reactivation if rituximab is administered without antiviral treatment, a potentially fatal complication of treatment. Patients with so‐called ‘resolved hepatitis B virus infection’ (HBsAg‐negative/cAb‐positive) may also be at risk. We performed a systematic review of the English and Chinese language literature to estimate the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBsAg‐negative/cAb‐positive patients receiving rituximab for lymphoma. A pooled risk estimate was calculated for HBV reactivation. The impact of HBsAb status and study design on reactivation rates was explored. Data from 578 patients in 15 studies were included. ‘Clinical HBV reactivation’, (ALT >3 × normal and either an increase in HBV DNA from baseline or HBsAg seroreversion), was estimated at 6.3% (I² = 63%, P = 0.006). Significant heterogeneity was detected. Reactivation rates were higher in prospective vs retrospective studies (14.2% vs 3.8%; OR = 4.39, 95% CI 0.83–23.28). Exploratory analyses found no effect of HBsAb status on reactivation risk (OR = 0.083; P = 0.151). Our meta‐analysis confirms a measurable and potentially substantial risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg‐negative/cAb‐positive patients exposed to rituximab. However, heterogeneity in the existing literature limits the generalizability of our findings. Large, prospective studies, with uniform definitions of HBV reactivation, are needed to clarify the risk of HBV reactivation in HBsAg‐negative/cAb‐positive patients.     

Viral determinants predicting hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance in HIV‐/HBV‐coinfected patients

The aim of this retrospective study was the identification of clinically useful viral determinants for the prediction of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance and sustained virological response in hepatitis B virus/human immunodeficiency virus (HBV‐/HIV)‐coinfected patients receiving HBV‐active combined antiretroviral therapy (cART). Quantification of HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA before and after initiation of HBV‐active cART in a cohort of 59 HIV‐/HBV‐coinfected patients was performed. Calculations of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and Kaplan–Meier analysis were used for the identification of predictors of HBsAg seroclearance for HBeAg‐positive [HBeAg(+); n = 36] and HBeAg‐negative [HBeAg(−);n = 23] patients. HBeAg(+) patients with an HBsAg on‐treatment decline ≥1 log IU/mL per year achieved higher HBsAg loss rates (P = 0.0294), whereas the quantification of HBeAg had no predictive value for HBsAg seroclearance. Among HBeAg(−) patients, a pretreatment baseline cut‐off level of HBsAg ≤100 IU/mL was highly predictive for HBsAg seroclearance. No significant influence of the HBV genotype on HBsAg seroclearance was observed among the entire cohort. Quantitative determination of HBsAg provides a clinically useful viral parameter for the prediction of HBsAg seroclearance both in HBeAg(+) and HBeAg(−) HIV‐/HBV‐coinfected patients receiving HBV‐active cART.     

HBsAg plasma level kinetics: a new role for an old marker as a therapy response predictor in vertically infected children on combination therapy

We aimed to investigate the ability of HBsAg plasma level kinetics to predict therapy response by studying 23 children with infancy‐acquired chronic hepatitis B (CHB) during combination sequential therapy with lead‐in lamivudine (LAM) and add‐on interferon‐α (IFN‐α) [5 responders (R = anti‐HBs seroconversion) and 18 nonresponders (NR)] and to assess their relationship with pretreatment intrahepatic HBV‐DNA and cccDNA and HBsAg and HBcAg liver expression. Plasma HBsAg levels were measured in samples before (treatment week 0 = TW0), during (TW9, TW28, TW52) and after (follow‐up week = FUW24) therapy by Abbott ARCHITECT^® assay [log₁₀IU/mL]. Baseline liver HBV‐DNA and cccDNA were quantified by real‐time TaqMan PCR [log₁₀copies/ng genomic DNA]. HBsAg and HBcAg liver expression was evaluated by immunostaining of formalin‐fixed, paraffin‐embedded specimens [number of positive cells/1000 hepatocytes]. All results are presented as medians. Plasma: at baseline, on‐treatment and during follow‐up, HBsAg levels were lower in R than NR (TW0: 4.36 vs 4.75;TW28: 2.44 vs 4.35;TW52: 0 vs 4.08 and FUW24: 0.17 vs 4.35, all P < 0.05). Liver: baseline HBV‐DNA (3.82 vs 4.71, P = 0.16) and cccDNA (1.98 vs 2.26, P = 0.18) tended to be lower in R than NR, HBsAg expression was lower in R than NR (0.5 vs 4.7, P = 0.03), and HBcAg expression was similar between R and NR. There were positive correlations between plasma HBsAg levels and liver HBV‐DNA (r = 0.44, P = 0.04), cccDNA (r = 0.41, P = 0.04) and HBsAg liver expression (r = 0.38, P = 0.05). Lower baseline HBsAg plasma levels, lower HBsAg expression in liver and on‐treatment decline of plasma HBsAg levels heralds HBsAg clearance and response to treatment in tolerant children with CHB.     

Frequent delayed spontaneous seroclearance of hepatitis B virus after incident HBV infection among adult high‐risk groups

High rates (~25%) of developing chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection (hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐positive for > 6 months following infection) have been observed in people who use drugs (PWUD) and men who have sex with men (MSM). We aimed to estimate the frequency of delayed HBsAg seroclearance, along with its determinants, and time to delayed HBsAg seroclearance. Data were used from MSM and PWUD enrolled in the Amsterdam Cohort Studies (1985‐2002) who had anti‐hepatitis B core antibody seroconversion. Potential determinants for standard HBsAg seroclearance, delayed HBsAg seroclearance and chronic HBV were examined using multinominal logistic regression. Time to HBsAg seroclearance was estimated using Kaplan‐Meier curves. A total of 147 incident HBV infections occurred during follow‐up. On initial HBsAg testing after infection (6‐12 months), 42 (29%) were HBsAg‐positive and 105 (71%) were HBsAg‐negative (‘standard HBsAg seroclearance’). Of the 42 initially HBsAg‐positive individuals, 22 subsequently tested HBsAg‐negative (of whom 7 (31.8%) were HBV DNA positive at last visit, suggesting occult HBV). Overall, 15 became HBsAg‐negative and HBV DNA‐negative (‘delayed HBsAg seroclearance’), while 27 remained HBsAg and/or HBV DNA‐positive (‘chronic HBV’). The 5‐year cumulative probability of delayed HBsAg seroclearance was 41.6% for initially HBsAg‐positive individuals. Delayed HBsAg seroclearance and remaining chronically infected were associated with younger age and HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV)‐co‐infection. In conclusion, delayed HBsAg seroclearance is common in these key adult populations at‐risk for HBV, while proportion developing HBV chronicity (18%) is still higher compared to the general population (~5%). Given the proportion of individuals with occult HBV infection and that HCV direct‐acting antivirals can lead to HBV reactivation, HBV DNA testing in HCV co‐infected MSM/PWUD are warranted prior to treatment initiation.     

Antiviral prophylaxis for hepatitis B carriers improves the prognosis of diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma in Taiwan – a population‐based study

The prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during rituximab treatment for diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is important in the HBV‐endemic area. This population‐based study examines the impact of antiviral prophylaxis for DLBCL patients with HBV infections. We identified 3702 adult patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL between 2011 and 2015 receiving R‐CHOP, R‐CVP, CHOP or CVP from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. We further stratified them into three groups: HBsAg‐negative patients (HBV‐negative, N = 2921), HBV carriers who received antiviral prophylaxis (HBV + Px, N = 711), and HBV carriers who did not receive antiviral prophylaxis (HBV + No Px, N = 70). HBV + Px patients were the youngest, and 69·4% received entecavir for antiviral prophylaxis. The median overall survival (mOS) of HBV‐negative and HBV + Px patients was similar (74·23 months and not reached, respectively). However, the mOS of HBV + No Px patients was only 35·61 months (P = 0·0028 compared with HBV + Px patients), indicating that antiviral prophylaxis improves OS in HBsAg‐positive DLBCL patients. The multivariate analysis showed that the HBV status and antiviral prophylaxis was an independent prognostic factor. In conclusion, our population‐based study illustrates the importance of antiviral prophylaxis in HBsAg‐positive DLBCL patients. Under antiviral prophylaxis, the survival of DLBCL patients with HBV infections was comparable to that of HBV‐negative patients.     

Precore G1896A mutation is associated with reduced rates of HBsAg seroclearance in treated HIV hepatitis B virus co‐infected patients from Western Africa

The nucleotide substitution G1896A on the precore (pc) region has been implicated in virological and serological responses during treatment in hepatitis B virus (HBV)‐infected patients. Whether this mutation affects the therapeutic course of HIV‐HBV co‐infected patients, especially from Western Africa, is unknown. In this prospective cohort study, 86 antiretroviral (ARV)‐naïve HIV‐HBV co‐infected patients from Côte d'Ivoire, initiating ARV‐treatment containing lamivudine (n = 53) or tenofovir (n = 33), had available baseline pc sequences. Association of the pcG1896A mutation with time to undetectable HBV‐DNA, hepatitis B “e” antigen (HBeAg) seroclearance (in HBeAg‐positive patients), and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroclearance was evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. At ARV‐initiation, median HBV‐DNA was 6.04 log₁₀ copies/mL (IQR = 3.70‐7.93) with 97.7% harbouring HBV genotype E. Baseline pcG1896A mutation was identified in 51 (59.3%) patients, who were more commonly HBeAg‐negative (P < .001) and had basal core promotor A1762T/G1764A mutations (P < .001). Patients were followed for a median 36 months (IQR = 24‐36). Cumulative proportion of undetectable HBV‐DNA was significantly higher in patients with baseline mutation (pcG1896A = 86.6% vs no pcG1896A = 66.9%, P = .04), but not after adjusting for baseline HBV‐DNA levels and anti‐HBV agent (P = .2). No difference in cumulative proportion of HBeAg seroclearance was observed between mutation groups (pcG1896A = 57.1% vs no pcG1896A = 54.3%, P = .7). Significantly higher cumulative proportion of HBsAg seroclearance was observed in patients without this mutation (pcG1896A = 0% vs no pcG1896A = 36.9%, P < .001), even after adjusting for baseline HBsAg quantification and anti‐HBV agent (P < .001). In conclusion, lacking the pcG1896A mutation before ARV initiation appeared to increase HBsAg seroclearance rates during treatment. The therapeutic implications of this mutation need further exploration in this setting.     

Long‐term follow‐up of patients treated with entecavir and peginterferon add‐on therapy for HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B infection: ARES long‐term follow‐up

Addition of peginterferon alpha (PEG‐IFN add‐on) to entecavir (ETV) treatment after a short lead‐in phase results in more response than ETV monotherapy in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B infection (CHB). This study is the first to assess long‐term efficacy of this treatment strategy. Patients who received ETV ± 24 weeks of PEG‐IFN add‐on in a global trial (ARES study) and completed follow‐up were eligible to participate in this observational LTFU study if they had at least one combined HBeAg and HBV DNA measurement beyond week 96 of the ARES study. The primary endpoint was combined response (HBeAg loss and HBV DNA <200 IU/mL) at LTFU. In total, 48 patients treated with PEG‐IFN add‐on and 48 patients treated with ETV monotherapy were included. The median follow‐up duration was 226 (IQR 51) weeks, and 86/96 (90%) patients were initial non‐responders. At LTFU, combined response was present in 13 (27%) vs 11 (23%) patients (P = 0.81), and 1 log₁₀ HBsAg decline in 59% vs 28% (P = 0.02) for PEG‐IFN add‐on and ETV monotherapy, respectively. In 41 initial non‐responders who continued ETV therapy, combined response at LTFU was present in 9 patients (PEG‐IFN add‐on: 5/22 [23%]; ETV monotherapy: 4/19 [21%]). Beyond week 96 of follow‐up, rates of serological response became comparable between PEG‐IFN add‐on and ETV monotherapy. Although in this LTFU study initial non‐responders were overrepresented in the add‐on arm, PEG‐IFN add‐on possibly leads rather to accelerated HBeAg loss than to increased long‐term HBeAg loss rates.     

Long‐term entecavir therapy results in falls in serum hepatitis B surface antigen levels and seroclearance in nucleos(t)ide‐naïve chronic hepatitis B patients

Entecavir (ETV) is reported to result in suppression of hepatitis B virus DNA (HBV DNA) replication with minimal drug resistance. However, information on the long‐term effect of such therapy on serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) level and elimination of HBsAg is not available. ETV therapy was started in 553 nucleos(t)ide‐naïve patients with chronic hepatitis B infection (HBeAg positive: 45%) in our hospital. Serum HBsAg levels were measured serially by the Architect assay. The median baseline HBsAg was 2180 IU/mL (0.12–243 000 IU/mL), and median follow‐up period was 3.0 years, with 529, 475, 355, 247 and 163 patients followed‐up for 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years, respectively. At year 5, the mean log HBsAg decline from baseline was −0.48 log IU/mL, and the cumulative HBsAg clearance rate was 3.5%. Multivariate analysis identified HBV DNA level at baseline (<3.0 log copies IU/mL, odd ratio = 10.2; 95% confidence interval = 1.87–55.5, P = 0.007) and HBsAg level (<500 IU/mL, odd ratio = 29.4; 95% confidence interval = 2.80–333, P = 0.005) as independent predictors of HBsAg seroclearance. These results indicate that although serum HBsAg level declines gradually during ETV therapy, HBsAg seroclearance remains a rare event.     

Efficacy of antepartum administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in preventing mother‐to‐child transmission of hepatitis B virus

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of antepartum administration of three doses of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in interrupting mother‐to‐child transmission (MTCT) of hepatitis B virus (HBV). In this trial, a total of 728 HBeAg‐positive pregnant women with chronic HBV infection who had an HBV DNA level higher than 6log₁₀ copies/mL were enrolled. They were divided into three groups based on individual preference. Subjects in group A and group B received 200 IU (unit) HBIG and 400 IU (unit) HBIG intramuscularly once a month at the third, second and first month before delivery, respectively. Subjects in the control group (C) received no special treatment. All the infants received passive‐active immunoprophylaxis. The HBsAg‐positive rate of all infants at 7‐12 months of age was 5.1% (37/728). Specifically, the HBsAg‐positive rate of infants was comparable in all three groups (5.3% vs 5.1% vs 5%, P = 0.988). No significant difference was found in anti‐HBs levels between the infants aged 7‐12 months in the three groups (P = 0.469). HBV DNA levels of the umbilical cord blood in the HBV‐infected group were higher than those in the uninfected group (5.2 vs 3.4log₁₀ copies/mL, P < 0.001), and these with family history of HBV infection were also higher (45.9% vs 28.5%, P = 0.034). To conclude, administration of passive‐active immunoprophylaxis to infants contributed to effective prevention of the MTCT of HBV; extra antepartum administration of HBIG during pregnancy could not decrease the rate of MTCT or increase the anti‐HBs levels of infants born to HBsAg‐positive mothers with HBV DNA higher than 6log₁₀ copies/mL.     

Identified OAS3 gene variants associated with coexistence of HBsAg and anti‐HBs in chronic HBV infection

The underlying mechanism of coexistence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis B surface antigen antibody (anti‐HBs) is still controversial. To identify the host genetic factors related to this unusual clinical phenomenon, a two‐stage study was conducted in the Chinese Han population. In the first stage, we performed a case‐control (1:1) age‐ and gender‐matched study of 101 cases with concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs and 102 controls with negative HBsAg and positive anti‐HBs using whole exome sequencing. In the second validation stage, we directly sequence the 16 exons on the OAS3 gene in two dependent cohorts of 48 cases and 200 controls. Although, in the first stage, a genome‐wide association study of 58,563 polymorphism variants in 101 cases and 102 controls found no significant loci (P‐value ≤ .05/58563), and neither locus achieved a conservative genome‐wide significance threshold (P‐value ≤ 5e‐08), gene‐based burden analysis showed that OAS3 gene rare variants were associated with the coexistence of HBsAg and anti‐HBs. (P‐value = 4.127e‐06 ≤ 0.05/6994). A total of 16 rare variants were screened out from 21 cases and 3 controls. In the second validation stage, one case with a stop‐gained rare variant was identified. Fisher’s exact test of all 149 cases and 302 controls showed that the rare coding sequence mutations were more frequent in cases vs controls (P‐value = 7.299e‐09, OR = 17.27, 95% CI [5.01‐58.72]). Protein‐coding rare variations on the OAS3 gene are associated with the coexistence of HBsAg and anti‐HBs in patients with chronic HBV infection in Chinese Han population.     

Predictors of sustained functional cure in hepatitis B envelope antigen‐negative patients achieving hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance with interferon‐alpha–based therapy

Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss is considered a functional cure in chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, the durability of HBsAg loss after stopping treatment remains unknown. This study aimed to assess the sustained functional cure achieved by interferon therapy in hepatitis B envelope antigen (HBeAg)‐negative CHB patients. In this prospective study, 176 HBeAg‐negative CHB patients with functional cure were enrolled for 12 weeks of cessation treatment, and treatment information and baseline data were collected. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) biomarkers and clinical biochemical indicators were evaluated every 3 months; liver imaging examinations were performed every 3‐6 months during the 48‐week follow‐up. The sustained functional cure was evaluated. After the 48‐week follow‐up, the sustained functional cure rate was 86.63%. The cumulative rates of HBsAg reversion and HBV DNA reversion were 12.79% and 2.33%, respectively. Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks after HBsAg loss achieved a significantly higher rate of sustained functional cure and significantly lower rate of HBsAg reversion than consolidation treatment < 12 weeks (76.19% vs 90.00%, P = 0.022 and 23.81% vs 9.23%, P = 0.014, respectively). Patients with hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) had higher rate of sustained functional cure than patients achieving HBsAg loss but without HBsAb (89.86% vs 73.53%, P = 0.012). Consolidation treatment ≥ 12 weeks (odds ratio [OR] 16.478; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.135‐127.151; P = 0.007) and high HBsAb levels (OR 8.312; 95% CI, 1.824‐37.881; P = 0.006) were independent predictors of sustained functional cure. Results suggested that 12 weeks of consolidation therapy after HBsAg clearance and elevated HBsAb levels help to improve functional cure.     

Cure for immune‐tolerant hepatitis B in children: is it an achievable target with sequential combo therapy with lamivudine and interferon?

We prospectively studied the HBsAg seroconversion with sequential combination therapy of lamivudine (LAM) and interferon (IFN) in hitherto untreatable ‘immune‐tolerant’ chronic hepatitis B in children. In this case–control study, 28 children with immune‐tolerant hepatitis B [HBsAg positive for >6 months with near normal aminotransferase level, minimal/no inflammation in liver histology and high viral load (HBV DNA>10⁷ copies/mL)] were treated with LAM alone at 3 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks followed by LAM plus IFN alpha (5 MU/m² three times a week) for another 44 weeks. They were compared with 34 untreated children. HBV markers (HBsAg, HBeAg, anti‐HBe, quantitative HBV DNA) were carried out at baseline, at the end of therapy and 6 monthly thereafter. The mean age was 5.9 ± 3.2 years and 24 were boys. End therapy response: HBe seroconversion was achieved in 11, and of these, five had complete response (HBsAg clearance), 11 did not respond and six had virologic response (DNA undetectable but no HBe seroconversion). Six months after therapy, 10 of the 11 (91%) originally seroconverted children remained seroconverted while one seroreverted. Six of the 28 (21.4%) children lost HBsAg and they remained HBsAg negative and anti‐HBs positive on follow‐up. After a mean follow‐up of 21.1 ± 11.9 months, the status remained same in the responders but one of the nonresponders HBe seroconverted (39.3%). There were no serious side effects of therapy. It is possible to achieve a cure in more than one‐fifth of immune‐tolerant children with hepatitis B with the sequential combination of LAM and IFN.     

IFNL3 (IL28B) polymorphism does not predict long‐term response to interferon therapy in HBeAg‐positive chronic hepatitis B patients

The impact of IFNL3 (IL28B) polymorphism on response to interferon (IFN) treatment in patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) is controversial. We aimed to investigate whether IFNL3 polymorphism (rs12979860) influences the long‐term response of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) treatment to conventional IFN. Design: Ninety‐seven HBeAg‐positive patients treated with IFN were evaluated in this study. Associations were investigated between IFNL3 genotypes and (i) HBeAg seroconversion at the end of treatment (EOT), (ii) sustained virological response (SVR) and (iii) HBsAg seroconversion through long‐term follow‐up (LTFU). Patients were followed for a median of 14 years. The majority of patients were infected with HBV genotype A (69.6%) and were Caucasian (77.9%). Ninety‐five patients were genotyped at rs12979860. Similar IFNL3 distribution was observed among the different ethnicities (P = 0.62) or across HBV genotypes A through G (P = 0.70). Thirty‐six patients experienced HBeAg seroconversion at EOT; HBeAg seroconversion rates were 37.0 and 35.5% in patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes, respectively (P = 0.82). Among the 44 patients (45%) who achieved a SVR, SVR rates were 48.9 and 39.6% in patients with CC and CT/TT IL28B genotypes, respectively (P = 0.80). HBsAg seroconversion occurred through LTFU in 28 patients. HBsAg seroconversion rates were 25.5 and 31.2% in patients with CC and CT/TT genotypes, respectively (P = 0.51). No significant relationship between IFNL3 rs12979860 and fibrosis stage was observed (P = 0.85). IFNL3 genotype was neither associated with SVR, nor with HBeAg seroconversion and long‐term HBsAg seroconversion in HBeAg‐positive CHB patients responding to IFN therapy.     

Prevalence and clinical features of patients with concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs: Evaluation of the hepatitis B research network cohort

The prevalence of concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs in plasma of persons with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is variable and its clinical significance enigmatic. We examined the prevalence and clinical and virological features of concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs in children and adults with chronic HBV infection living in North America. A total of 1462 HBsAg positive participants in the Hepatitis B Research Network paediatric and adult cohorts were included (median age 41 (range 4‐80) years, 48% female, 11% white, 13% black, 73% Asians). Only 18 (1.2%) were found to be anti‐HBs positive (≥10 mIU/mL) at initial study evaluation. Distributions of sex, race, HBV genotype and ALT were similar between participants with and without concurrent anti‐HBs. Those who were anti‐HBs positive appeared to be older (median age 50 vs 41 years, P = .06), have lower platelet counts (median 197 vs 222 × 103/mm³, P = .07) and have higher prevalence of HBeAg (44% vs 26%, P = .10). They also had lower HBsAg levels (median 2.0 vs 3.5 log₁₀ IU/mL, P = .02). Testing of follow‐up samples after a median of 4 years (range 1‐6) in 12 of the 18 participants with initial concurrent anti‐HBs showed anti‐HBs became undetectable in 6, decreased to <10 mIU/mL in 1 and remained positive in 5 participants. Two patients lost HBsAg during follow‐up. In conclusion, prevalence of concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs was low at 1.2%, with anti‐HBs disappearing in some during follow‐up, in this large cohort of racially diverse children and adults with chronic HBV infection living in North America. Presence of concurrent HBsAg and anti‐HBs did not identify a specific phenotype of chronic hepatitis B, nor did it appear to affect clinical outcomes.     

Do we need an ‘in‐house’ neutralization assay for confirmation of hepatitis B surface antigen? Answers from a tertiary care hospital in India

Background and Aims: Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) is an important serological marker for diagnosis of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Commercial kits for detection of HBsAg emphasize confirmation by neutralization assays. In this study, we have standardized an ‘in‐house’ neutralization test for HBsAg confirmation. Methods: Among 6684 HBsAg‐positive samples, 615 were subjected to an ‘in‐house’ HBsAg neutralization test (NT). Of these, 91 (100%) high‐reactive samples (optical density [OD] 1.000–3.000) and 286 (93%) of 289 low‐reactive samples (OD < 1.000) were neutralized, and 235 (100%) grey‐zone reactive samples were ‘in‐house’ NT negative. Eighty‐four samples of varying reactivities that were tested by the ‘in‐house’ NT were compared with a commercial NT (AxSYM, Abbott). Results: The ‘in‐house’ NT showed an excellent agreement (κ = 0.83, P < 0.001) with the commercial confirmatory assay. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 90%, 94%, 96% and 87%, respectively. Conclusion: The enzyme immunoassay‐based ‘in‐house’ HBsAg neutralization assay is a feasible alternative to the commercial HBsAg confirmatory assay. This technique is easily adaptable, cost‐effective and reliable for the confirmation of HBsAg in a low resource setting, enhancing the overall quality of HBsAg screening.     

Viral activity and outcome of hepatitis B surface antigen‐positive grafts in deceased liver transplantation

Indications of liver transplantation are extensive, but deceased donation does not meet the demand. Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐positive grafts used to be discarded in the past. The aim of this study was to examine viral activity and outcome of HBsAg‐positive deceased grafts transplanted to HBsAg‐positive recipients. Eleven HBsAg‐positive deceased grafts were transplanted to HBsAg‐positive patients with acute liver failure (3 patients), hepatocellular carcinoma (6 patients) and repeatedly bleeding varices (2 patients). Postoperatively, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was treated by a combination of antiviral nucleoside and nucleotide analogues. HBV DNA and HBsAg were measured periodically. The median (interquartile) model of end‐stage liver disease score for the recipients was 19 (16‐32) with a range from 11 to 40. HBV DNA was detected in 6 patients with a range from 61 to 1083 IU/mL before transplantation. After transplantation, HBV DNA was detected in 4 patients in the first month and 2 patients in the 6th month and became undetectable for all patients at end of the first year. The quantitative HBsAg ranged from 0.86 to 241.1 IU/mL at 6 months and 0.34 to 238.5 IU/mL at 24 months (P = .135). Three of the patients died in the early phase, and the other patients were followed up for 40.0 ± 19.2 months with normal liver function. In conclusion, HBsAg‐positive deceased liver grafts function well with minimal viral activity under treatment of combined antiviral nucleoside and nucleotide analogues. Use of HBsAg‐positive deceased grafts is feasible and increases the donor pool to rescue dying patients.